IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, AT BENGALURU
(MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISCLANEOUS APPLICATION
FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIKA
SURAKSHA SANHITA)
IN THE COURT OF THE 29th ADDL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, MAYOHALL, AT BENGALURU
CRIME.No.113/2025
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE , AT BENGALURU
CRL.MISC.NO. /2025
BETWEEN RANK OF THE
PARTY
LOWER COURT
THIS COURT
1.SRI.HIRJI NARAYAN PATEL
C/o Narayan,
Aged about 50 years,
Residing at,
Flat No.1403 B Zenith Residences,
Opposite to Lumbini Garden,
Nagawara Village,
Arabic College PO,
Bengaluru 560 045 ACCUSED No.1
PETITIONER No.1
2.SRI.HIMANSHU KISHORE NAIK
C/o Kishore Naik,
Aged about 51years,
Residing at,
No.A1103, Aishwarya Excellency,
Old Madras Road,
Opp Tin Factory,
Vijina pura/ Dooravaninagar,
Bengaluru 560 016 ACCUSED No.2
PETITIONER No.2
3.SONVANE HIREN
S/O Rajesh Kumar,
Aged about 35 years,
Currently Residing at,
No.1403 B Zenith Residences,
Nagawara Village,
Bengaluru 560 045
Native of
No.29, Jhulelal Colony,
New Airport Road,
Sardarnagar, Ahmedabad City,
Sardarnagar,
Gujarat 382 475 ACCUSED No.3
PETITIONER No.3
AND
STATE BY
MAHADEVAPURA.P.S.
Represented by P.P
Mayohall Court-Complex,
Bengaluru COMPLAINANT
RESPONDENT
THE PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED, THROUGH APPLICATION
UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIKA SURAKSHA
SANHITA, MOST HUMBLY BEGS TO STATE AS FOLLOWS:
1. For the service of Court Notices, Summons, etc., the
Addresses of the petitioners is clearly furnished in the above
cause title for the emergency purpose it may also serve to their
counsel Sri.HARISH PRABHU.S AND ASSOCIATES, Advocates,
No.25, 2nd Floor, 40Feet Road, SVG Nagar, Mudalapalya,
Bangalore-560072. For Similar Purpose the Address of the
Respondent is also correctly furnished in the above cause title.
2. The Respondent Police have registered a case for the
offences Punishable under Section 126(2), 132, 221, 3(5), 351(2),
352 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE
3. The brief facts of the case is that on 17-02-2025, the
Complainant Sri.Mayank Istwal, Sub Inspector, Kalyan Puri Police
Station, East Delhi has registered a Complaint in Mahadevpura
Police Station alleging that, Proprietor of M/s Balaji Paper and
Stationary Mart Sri.Vikas Narula had registered a case in
FIR.No.85/2021 under section 420, 406, 120B of Indian Penal
Code against owners of Benir E Store, that is Hirji Narayan Patel.
During the course of investigation sections under 467, 468, 471,
192, 201, 409 of Indian Penal Code were also implicated into the
present case, it is stated that, in the meantime, the Accused
persons had approached the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi seeking
aniticipatory bail which is granted and also seeking quash and
the Complainant had approached the Hon’ble court seeking
cancellation of bail, during the hearing the Hon’ble court through
its orders dated 15-10-2024 directed that, “ the investigating
officer is at liberty to access such computers and to make copy of
the data for forensic examination as he may want” , the
Complainant alleges that, in compliance of the directions passed
by the Hon’ble High court of Delhi, he had clarifications were
sought from FSL, to arrange a crime team to visit the spot for
necessary assistance and thereafter on their suggestion, in order
to carry out investigation the Complainant along with the IO SI
Maya Shankar reached Mahadevpura Police station, Bengaluru
and sought for police assistance to collect the evidences in the
present case at Benier Pvt Ltd at ITPL Road, Bengaluru.
Thereafter on 27-09-2024, the Complainant along with IO SI Maya
Shankar, Local Police and Female Staff accompanied by the De
facto Complainant in FIR.No.85/2021 and his brother Tarun Gupta
to identify the second office of the Accused Hirji Narayan Patel
reached Benir Pvt Ltd to seize the alleged Computers/Laptops
containing true copy of the forged documents data. The Co
accused Hemanshu Naik with his employees was present who
joined investigation, when he was asked to provide the numbers
of the Computers present in the office containing the alleged
data, he had told them 40-45 computers/laptops are present in
the office right now, further the Complainant states that, the
Accused person was given an opportunity to retriev/take out data
of their use as the hard disk of the Computers and laptops were
required to be seized for further investigation at FSL, Delhi.
It is alleged that, Hirji Narayan Patel had reached the office and
caught hold of Tarun Gupta ( Brother of Complainant in
FIR.No.85/2021) and started to argue with him, it is alleged that,
when IO Maya Shankar tried to pacify the argument, it is alleged
that, he had abused the Police staff on duty and misbehaving
with them, it is alleged that, after repeated requests also both
the accused Hirji Patel and Hemanshu Kishore Nail did not co
operate in the investigation, however accused sought 1 day time
to copy the data and provide hard disk as well as Laptop for FSL
Examination. Hence they had served a notice upon them to
provide alleged Computer/Laptops.
It is further alleged that, on 28-09-2024 at around 16.38
( 4.38pm), when the IO with local police reached the office of the
Accused persons for seizing the property, Hirji Narayan Patel
along with his counsel and many other employees were present
there, upon reaching the counsel for the accused person had
started to question the IO and gave reply to notice dated 27-09-
2024, it is alleged even though he was shown the Documents eh
had stopped the investigation process. It is alleged that, even
after the Complainant had provided all the required documents
the Advocate and Accused did not co operate for investigation, it
was found that accused deliberately made many computers and
laptops to disappear from his office and Accused Vipul Patel and
Himanshu Kishore Naik also disappeared from the office with
laptops and the IO has recorded the same on his phone.
It is alleged that, when the IO Continued to carry out
investigation, accused Hirji Narayan Patel and his employee Hiren
Sonvane along with other employee present there intentionally
locked the main door of the crime scene premises, knowing that
the investigation officer with local staff are inside the office for
seizure of case property and again started creating chaos, it is
alleged that, after locking the gate, employees of Hirji Patel had
surrounded the IO and started to record video from their mobiles,
they were talking in Kannada language and made environment
tense and spoilt the atmosphere and alleged dispite repeated
directions from IO Hirji and his employees did not co operate in
the investigation and they flatly refused to give hard disks of the
computers. It is alleged that, the IO had directed local Police to
make a PCR Call and efforts made out by the IO to collect the
case property went in vain. Alleging this the Complainant has
registered a Complaint with the Mahadevpura Police station,
which came to be registered in Crime.No.113/2025 for the
offences punishable under section Section 126(2), 132, 221, 3(5),
351(2), 352 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. The Copy of
the FIR and Complaint is herewith produced as DOCUMENT No.1
and DOCUMENT No.2.
4. The Petitioner No.1 is the owner of Benir Pvt Ltd a pan India
Company having branches all over India and over 500
employees working, the Petitioner No.2 and Petitioner No.3 are
there employees in Bengaluru branch situated in ITPL. They are
projected as Accused in Crime.No.113/2025 registered for non
bailable offences, hence this petition.
GROUNDS
5. The Petitioner No.1,2 and 3 most humbly submit that, they
are innocent of commission of any offences alleged and this false
case is been registered with sole purpose of implicating the
Petitioners into false criminal case, project them in bad light and
also deter them from fighting for their right in the court of law.
6. It is most humbly submitted that, the a dispute arouse
between M/s Balaji Paper and Stationary Mart owned by Sri.Vikas
Narula and Benir E Store namely Hirji Narayan Patel over the
payment of defective masks supplied by M/s Balaji Paper and
Stationary Mart and Benir E store, even though it was a dispute of
civil nature, the owners of M/s Balaji Papers and stationary mart
had invoked the criminal law due to which FIR.No.85/2021 came
to be registered in Krishna Puri Police station.
7. It is most humbly submitted that, the Complaint is registered
on 17-02-2025 about an alleged incident that is said to have been
taken place on 27-09-2024 and 28-09-2024 after a delay of
143(almost 5 months), which clearly projects the malicious
intention behind the complaint registered.
8. The Petitioner No.1,2 and 3 most humbly submit that, the
Petitioner No.1 had approached the Hon’ble High court of Delhi in
FIR.No.85/2021 registered for offences punishable under section
420, 406, 120B, 467, 468, 471, 192, 201, 409 of Indian Penal
Code seeking anticipatory bail and the Hon’ble court was pleased
to grant him bail and is currently on bail.
9. It is humbly submitted that, the during the proceedings quash
petition before the Hon’ble High court of Delhi, the Hon’ble court
had through its orders dated 11-07-2024 passed a direction that “
The Investigating officer is at liberty to access such
computers and to make copies of the data for forensic
examination, as he may want”, the above order was very
clear that the Investigating officer was at liberty to ACCESS
SUCH COMPUTER and make COPIES OF THE DATA for the
forensic examination, which was the point of dispute when the
Complainant herein visited the office of Benir E Store, belonging
to Petitioner No.1.
10. The Petitioners most humbly submits that, the
Complainant in the present case neither issued any prior
intimation or a notice to the Petitioners and had suddenly been
to their office in ITPL on 27-09-2024 and more so without any
person from the IT Department to deal with the Computers and
Laptops, they had taken the De facto Complainant in
FIR.No.85/2021 Mr.Vikas Narula and his brother Tarun Gupta,
wherein Mr.Tarun Gupta started to record videos of the
employees, due to which the few female employees of the
Petitioners were uncomfortable and when they requested him to
stop recording them, he had abused them Hindi, due to which the
atmosphere had turned bit tensed.
11. The Petitioner No.1,2 and 3 most humbly submits that,
the Petitioners had tried to explain the issue and also provided
access to the Investigation officer and the Complainant herein,
after which the Complainant had expressed his desire to seize all
the computers and Laptops and take their physical possession to
send it to FSL Examination.
12. It is submitted that, since the Computers and Laptops
in the office of Benir E Store contains several data which are not
related to the case in FIR.No.85/2021 and also entire data of the
business affairs of the Company, such as Proprietary Data, Non
Disclosure Agreements, Client List, Work Tenders, Budgeting,
salaries, statements softwares, licenses product keys, which
would completely halt the work process of Benir E Store, the
same was explained to the Complainant and the IO.
13. The Petitioners humbly submit that, even though the
Petitioners pleaded that, if they preferred to take the physical
possession of the Computer and laptops, they would incur losses
worth crores and it would end up in multiple litigations against
the company and would paralyses the business operations, the IO
was not inclined with the Petitioners, as he is hand in glove with
Vikas Narula who is harassing the Petitioner No.1 to heed to his
demands and the Complainant had issued him a notice dated 27-
09-2024 at 8pm directing the Petitioners to hand over all the
original hard disks on 28-09-2024. Which was an impossible task
as the time required to make copies of all computers would take
a minimum time of 5 to 6 days, this was done solely to pressure
the Petitioner No.1 to enter into a compromise with the Vikas
Narula and the same is an arbitrary act.
14. It is most humbly submits that, the Petitioner No.1 on
the next day had called upon their Advocate who represents
them before the Hon’ble High court of Delhi and he was also
present when the Complainant had been to the alleged place of
incident on 28-09-2024, he had tried to explain the order dated
11-07-2024 of Delhi High court, which required him to make only
copies of the Data and not physical possession, but the
Investigation officer who was under the influence of Vikas Narula
of M/s Balaji Mart was not in agreement with the Advocate and
the Advocate directed the Petitioner to give a reply notice to the
notice of the IO Dated 27-09-2024, thereafter since several
people had gathered there to see so many police in the office
space, only with a sole intention of preventing from getting
defamed in and around the office space, the Petitioners had
sought for permission of the Mahadevpura Police officials who
were present at the place of incident, they had then closed the
door of the office, there was no malafide intention of confining
any person inside the office, further they had co operated with
the Complainant, after accessing the Computers and Laptops for
a while, the Complainant had left the place along with the local
police. The Copy of the Reply Notice dated 28-09-2024 is
produced as DOCUMENT No.3.
15. The Petitioners humbly submit that, there are no
ingredients in the complaint that, would constitute offences under
section 126(2), 132, 221, 3(5), 351(2), 352 of The Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita 2023 even then the Complaint is been registered
solely to implicate the Petitioners in bad light and harass them, if
any such incident amounting to offence would have taken place,
the Local Mahadevapura Police who were present at the place of
incident would arrested the Petitioners at the very place, which
clearly projects that, the Petitioners neither wrongfully restrained
any person nor have they assaulted or used any criminal force to
deter any public servant from discharging his duties, neither did
they intimidate any person nor have they intentionally insulted
any person with intent to provoke breach of peace.
16. It is submitted that, no incident of such gravity took
place on 28-09-2024 as alleged by the Complaint, the Advocate
of the Petitioner and the De facto complainant had different
interpretation on the order of the Hon’ble High court Delhi dated
11-07-2024, thereafter Complainant had accessed the
Computers and Laptops, thereafter left the place as they could
not handle the Computer and Laptop as they were without a any
person from IT Department, the Advocate and the Complainant
had discussed that, they would take clarity on the order of the
Hon’ble High court on the next date of hearing , after around 5
months this false case is been registered due to malafide
inducement form Mr.Vikas Narula who is the owner of M/s Balaji
Mart, with sole intention of deterring and harassing the
Petitioners.
17. The Petitioner No.1,2 and 3 humbly submits that,
during the hearing of Petition before the Hon’ble High court of
Delhi, submissions were made regarding the incident and the
Hon’ble High court of Delhi has directed the Petitioners to submit
the complete footage of the office with incidents on 27-09-2024
and 28-09-2024, thereafter the Complainant of Krishna Puri Police
station had been to the office of the Petitioner in January 2025
and also collected the physical possession of all the computers
and laptops in question.
18. The Petitioner No.1,2 and 3 most humbly beg to state
that, the Petitioners are submitting themselves before this
Hon’ble court and they are ready to co- operate with the
investigation agency, with suitable protection from this Hon’ble
court, if the Petitioners are not granted anticipatory bail, the
Mahadevpura Police would be permitted to abuse the process of
law and to harass the Petitioners, the very fact that, they
themselves approaching this Hon’ble court projects their
bonafide interest to abide by the law of land and there are no
chances of them evading law.
19. It is most humbly submitted that, the very purpose of
registering this criminal case on false allegations is to humiliate
the Petitioners by arresting them, the Petitioner No.1 and 2 are
aged about 50 years and the Petitioner No.3 is aged 35years, the
Petitioner No.1 is a prominent businessman in Indian, the
Petitioner No.2 and 3 are the employees of Benir E Store, they
have led a dignified life till date and if they are arrested in this
false case, they and their entire family would be put to great
humiliation at the hands of society.
20. The Petitioners have complied with the orders of the
Hon’ble High court of Delhi and the Complainant citing his
discretion has secured the physical possessions of the computers
and laptops, which has led to monetary loss and several
disagreements with customers, if the Petitioners are arrested
during the present situation of turmoil in the company, they will
be put to untold hardship and severe loss of goodwill.
21. The Petitioner No.1,2 and 3 humbly submit that, the
Petitioners apprehension is well founded on the documents
available as they are projected as accused in a crime registered
for non bailable offence, the present case is an independent case
registered within the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble court and there is
no embargo upon this court to grant anticipatory bail to the
Petitioners herein.
22. The Petitioners humbly submit that, they are ready and
willing to furnish adequate surety for their due appearance before
the Court. They undertake that, they will not tamper with the
prosecution witnesses and are ready and willing to abide by all
conditions imposed by this Hon’ble court.
23. The Petitioners humbly submit that, no petition of same
nature is pending before any other court of law and produce
additional documents at the time of hearing the main Petition.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner No.1,2 and 3named above pray that, this
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order, enlarging the
Petitioners on anticipatory bail in Crime.no.113/2025 registered by
Mahadevpura police station, Bengaluru for the offence punishable
under Section 126(2), 132, 221, 3(5), 351(2), 352 of The Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita 2023, pending before the Hon’ble 29 th Addl Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, at Bengaluru, to meet the ends of justice.
BENGALURU
DATE: 27-02-2025 ADVOCATE
FOR PETITIONERS
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, AT BENGALURU
CRL.MISC.NO. /2025
PETITIONER: 1.SRI.HIRJI
NARAYAN PATEL
2.SRI.HIMANSHU KISHORE NAIK
3.SONVANE
HIREN
V/s
RESPONDENT: STATE BY
MAHADEVPURA PS
INTERIM APPLICTION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE BHARATIYA
NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SANHITA, the Petitioners most humbly begs
to state as follows:
1. The Respondent Mahadevpura Police have registered a case in
Crime.No.113/2025 for the offences punishable under section
Section 126(2), 132, 221, 3(5), 351(2), 352 of The Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
2. The Contents of the Main Petition may be considered part and
parcel of this Application for the purpose of avoiding repetition,
the Madevpura Police have registered a Complaint for non
bailable offences.
3. It is most humbly submitted that, the Complainant in the present
case happens to be the Sub Inspector of Krishna Puri Police
station, Delhi, who has registered a Compliant on 17-02-2025
about an incident that is alleged to have taken place on 28-09-
2025, which prima facie projects that, the above complaint is
registered solely with a purpose of arresting the Petitioners and
humiliating them before the Society and Business class.
4. The Petitioners humbly submit that, the Petitioner No.1 is the
owner of Benir E store and the Petitioner No.2 and 3 are its
employees of Bengaluru, the said company is a Pan India
Company with several branches all over the country and
employing 500 individuals, further the Petitioners during the
proceedings before the Hon’ble High court of Delhi have agreed
to co operate with the investigation along with the IO in
FIR.No.85/2021, such being the case, if the interim bail is not
granted and the De factor Complainant being a Police officer,
there is every chance of the Respondent Police abusing the
process of law by arresting the Petitioners and humiliating them
before the society and business class.
5. It is most humbly submitted that, this false case is a result of the
Commercial dispute between Benir Pvt Ltd and M/S Balaji Papers
and Stationary Mart, the opposite party being financial, politically
strong have induced the De facto complainant register the above
case, eventhough no incident of such gravity took place on the
alleged date of incident, there is every chance of them wielding
their influence on Respondent Police also to humiliate and
defame the Petitioners.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner No.1,2 and 3 most humbly prays that, this
Hon’ble court be pleased to grant interim bail to the Petitioner in
Crime.no.113/2025 of the Mahadevpura Police station registered for
the offence under Section 126(2), 132, 221, 3(5), 351(2), 352 of The
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, till the disposal of the main petition
pending before this Hon’ble court, in the interest of justice.
BENGALURU
DATE: 27-02-2025 ADVOCATE FOR
PETITIONERS
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, AT BENGALURU
CRL.MISC.NO. /2025
PETITIONER: 1.SRI.HIRJI
NARAYAN PATEL
2.SRI.HIMANSHU KISHORE NAIK
3.SONVANE
HIREN
V/s
RESPONDENT: STATE BY
MAHADEVPURA PS
AFFIDAVIT
I, HIRJI NARAYAN PATEL S/O NARAYAN, aged about 50 years, residing
at No. Flat No.1403 B Zenith Residencies, Opposite to Lumbini Garden,
Nagawara Village, Arabic College PO, Bengaluru 560 045, do hereby
solemnly state on oath and affirm as follows:
1. I state that, I am the Petitioner No.1 in the present Petition filed
under section 482 of the BNSS and well aware of the facts and
circumstances of the case and I am swearing this Affidavit in
behalf of Petitioner No.2 and 3 who are my employees.
2. I state that, the Mahadevpura Police have on 17-02-2025
registered a Complaint for non bailable offences in
Crime.No.113/2025 on the basis of Complaint from De facto
Complainant Sri.Mayank Istwal, who is the Sub Inspector of
Krishna Puri Police station, Delhi.
3. I state that, I am the owner of Benir E Store Company and there
was a financial dispute between my company and M/s Balaji
Papers and Stationary Mart, as they had supplied defective
masks during the covid and we had stopped the payment as they
had not replaced the same after several reminders, even though
the entire issue is civil in nature, the Owners of M/s Balaji Papers
and Stationary Mart Mr.Vikas Narula had initiated a Criminal Case
in FIR.No.85/2021, in which I have been granted anticipatory bail
and I am on bail in the predicate case.
4. I had approached the Hon’ble High court of Delhi seeking quash
of proceedings in FIR.No.85/2021, the Hon’ble High court of Delhi
had through orders dated 11-07-2024 passed a direction that “
The Investigating officer is at liberty to access such
computers and to make copies of the data for forensic
examination, as he may want”, the above order was very
clear that the Investigating officer was at liberty to ACCESS
SUCH COMPUTER and make COPIES OF THE DATA for the
forensic examination, which was the point of dispute when the
Complainant herein visited the office of Benir E Store, belonging
to me.
5. I had questioned the De facto Complainant, the Sub Inspector of
Krishnapuri Police station as they had been to the Benir E Store
office without prior intimation or notice and without any person
from FSL or IT Department to handle the Computer, he was
accompanied by Vikas Narula and his brother, who had started to
make videos of the employees working and few female
employees felt awkward through their behavior.
6. I state that, the debate took place as the De facto Complainant
expressed his desire to seize the Computers and Laptops and he
had issued notice to deliver them in a period of day through his
notice dated 27-09-2024, thereafter I had called up my Advocate
who was present on 28-09-2024, he tried to explain that the
Hon’ble High court had only directed to access and extract copies
of the Data and not the physical possession as they contained
other documents of business, which would directly affect the
business of Benir E store, eventhough my Advocate explained to
the Sub Inspector and IO of Krishna puri Police, they were not
inclined and still demanded to seize the Computers and Laptop
physically.
7. I state that, since the De Facto Complainant insisted to seize, we
had then co operated with them, during this process, even
Mahadevpura Police were also present along with the Krishnapuri
Police officials, all the general public, employees of other
companies were gathering seeing several police officials in Benir
E Store office, then I had taken the permission of one of the
officers of Mahadevpura Police to close the door of the office as
they would be defamed near the office space and once they had
permitted we had closed the office doors and the same was not
done with any malafide intention.
8. I state that, after accessing the computers and Laptops for few
hours, since the De facto Complainant and his collegues
understood that, they required a IT Professional to secure the
Computer and Data, they had left the place and they had also
told the Advocate present that, both will get a clarification on the
Order dated 11-07-2024 on the next date of hearing.
9. I state that, after getting a clarification before the Honb’le High
court of Delhi, since the IO still embarked on securing physical
possession, on the directions of the Hon’ble High court, the De
Facto Complainant had been to the office of Benir E Stores in
January 2025 and seized all the computers and Laptops required.
10. I state that, no incident of such magnitude or gravity as
projected in Compliant dated 17-02-2025 took place on 28-09-
2024, it was a healthy debate between us and the IO of
Krishnapuri Police as we both had different interpretation of the
Order of the Hon’ble High court.
11. I State that, after a lapse of almost 5 months, on the
inducement of Mr.Vikas Narula, the De facto Complainant has
registered this false complaint and implicated me and my
employees as accused in a criminal case in Crime.No.113/2025
registered for non bailable offences.
12. I have serious apprehension of being arrested in Crime.No.
113/2025 registered for non bailable offence for the sole purpose
of humiliating me and my company officials before society and
friends and without protection from this Hon’ble court there is
every chance of the Respondent Police abuse the process of law.
WHATEVERE stated in Para No.1 to 12 are true and correct as per my
knowledge, belief and information.
WHEREFORE, I most humbly pray before this Ho’nble court, that this
Hon’ble court be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to me in
Crime.No.113/2025 registered by the Mahadevpura Police station for
offences punishable under Section 126(2), 132, 221, 3(5), 351(2), 352
of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, pending before the Hon’ble 29th
Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, in the interest of Justice.
BENGALURU
DATE: 27-02-2025 DEPONENT
IDENTIFIED BY ME:
ADVOCATE
NO. OF CORRECTIONS
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, AT BENGALURU
CRL.MISC.NO. /2025
PETITIONER: SRI.HIRJI NARAYAN
PATEL & OTHERS
V/s
RESPONDENT: STATE BY
MAHADEVPURA PS
INDEX
SL.N DESCRIPTION PAGE.N P.F
O O
1. MEMORANDUM OF APPLICATION UNDER
SECTION 482 OF THE BHARATIYA
NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SANHITA
2. THE COPY OF THE FIR AND COMPLAINT AS
DOCUMENT-1 AND DOCUMENT-2.
3. THE COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE DATED
28-09-2024 AS DOCUMENT-3
4. INTERIM APPLICATION UNDER SECTION
482 BNSS
5. AFFIDAVIT NO.1
6. VOKALATHNAMA
7 PROCESS MEMO WITH RESPONDENT
COPY.
BENGALURU
DATE: 27-02-2025 ADVOCATE FOR
PETITIONERS
