HIV Risk Reduction for PWID in China
HIV Risk Reduction for PWID in China
Abstract
Background: HIV transmission among people who inject drugs (PWID) is high in Yunnan and Guangxi provinces in
southwest China. To address this epidemic, Population Services International (PSI) and four cooperating agencies
implemented a comprehensive harm reduction model delivered through community-based drop-incenters (DiC)
and peer-led outreach to reduce HIV risk among PWID.
Methods: We used 2012 behavioral survey data to evaluate the effectiveness of this model for achieving changes
in HIV risk, including never sharing needles or syringes, always keeping a clean needle on hand, HIV testing and
counseling (HTC), and consistent condom use. We used respondent-driven sampling to recruit respondents. We
then used coarsened exact matching (CEM) to match respondents during analysis to improve estimation of the
effects of exposure to both DiC and outreach, only DiC, and only outreach, modeled using multivariable logistic
regression.
Results: We found a significant relationship between participating in both peer-led DiC-based activities and
outreach and having a new needle on hand (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, p < .05) and consistent condom use (OR 3.31,
p < .001). We also found a significant relationship between exposure to DiC activities and outreach and HIV testing
in Kunming (OR 2.92, p < .01) and exposure to peer-led outreach and HIV testing through referrals in Gejiu, Nanning,
and Luzhai (OR 3.63, p < .05).
Conclusions: A comprehensive harm reduction model delivered through peer-led and community-based strategies
reduced HIV risk among PWID in China. Both DiC activities and outreach were effective in providing PWID behavior
change communications (BCC) and HTC. HTC is best offered in settings like DiCs, where there is privacy for testing
and receiving results. Outreach coverage was low, especially in Guangxi province where the implementation model
required building the technical capacity of government partners and grassroot organizations. Outreach appears to
be most effective for referring PWID into HTC, especially when DiC-based HTC is not available and increasing
awareness of DiCs where PWID can receive more intensive BCC interventions.
Keywords: Social marketing, Drop-in center, Community-based outreach, Behavior change communication (BCC),
People who inject drugs (PWID), Respondent-driven sampling (RDS), Needle-syringe exchange program (NSP),
Condom use, HIV testing and counseling (HTC), Coarsened exact matching (CEM)
* Correspondence: uangkai@gmail.com
1
PSI/China, 909-9 F, M2 Building, Harmonious Society, Xiaokang Rd,
Hongyun Community, Wuhua District, Kunming 650000, China
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2014 Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
Wang et al. Harm Reduction Journal 2014, 11:15 Page 2 of 9
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/11/1/15
regarding safe injecting practices and overdose prevention; sampling method used to recruit hard-to-reach popula-
and (5) promotion of ARV and MMT adherence. Addition- tions, including PWID [15-17]. RDS relies on the as-
ally, project partners conducted a set of essential ‘enabling sumption that, given sufficiently long referral chains (i.e.,
environment’ interventions that aimed to improve policies 3–6 waves of respondents), the sample composition be-
through advocacy, reduce stigma and discrimination, sup- comes stable or reaches ‘equilibrium’, which results in a
port community mobilization, build capacity of local orga- sample that has the characteristics of a probability sam-
nizations, support income generation for PWID, and use ple. We then used sampling weights to account for the
strategic information for decision-making. social networks used in chain referral recruiting.
In Yunnan province, PSI implemented the Huxianghao We started by recruiting 4–8 seeds in each study city.
(HXH, ‘Good for you good for me’) program in Kunming We gave each seed three coupons and asked him/her to
city, which included DiC and outreach activities to de- recruit three peers from his/her social network to partici-
liver a wide range of services for PWID. PSI also pro- pate in the study. We diversified seeds based on age, sex,
moted the replication of the established HXH program exposure to program interventions, current MMT use,
model in Kunming through technical assistance (TA) to and current injecting status (current or former PWID).
community rehabilitation programs. In Gejiu city, PSI The recruitment coupons were uniquely numbered, which
and project partners provided TA and funding support allowed us to link seeds to their referrals and track the
to PWID-led community-based organizations to conduct length of recruitment chains. Participants included in the
DiC and outreach activities. study were those who were aged 18 to 49, intravenous
In Guangxi province, PSI-implemented outreach activ- drug users in the past 12 months, residing in one of the
ities in Nanning city and provided TA to the local CDC, study cities for a minimum of 1 month, able to speak and
community rehabilitation programs, and community- comprehend Mandarin Chinese enough to respond to sur-
based organizations in Nanning and Luzhai City to con- vey questions, and not under the influence of drugs or al-
duct DiC and outreach activities. Project partners also cohol at the time of the survey.
supported community-based organizations by working We collected data through face-to-face interviews in
on MMT and ARV adherence with PWID and with the locations where respondents' privacy could be protected.
Luzhai CDC to conduct outreach. In Yunnan, the DiC The questionnaire covered several topics, including
and outreach activities included HTC, whereas in demographic characteristics, injecting behaviors, sexual
Guangxi, clients were referred to hospital or government activity, condom use, STI testing, HIV testing, and ex-
centers for testing. posure to program activities. The Yunnan Institution for
Drug Abuse Institutional Review Board provided ethical
Objective review and approval. We obtained informed consent be-
Following several years of program implementation, we fore conducting interviews. All interviewers and others
aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this comprehen- associated with the study completed training on human
sive harm reduction model delivered through partici- subjects' protection.
pation in community-based DiCs and interpersonal
outreach for improving HIV risk behavior among PWID Measures
in southwestern China. Given the nature of the program, We assessed four outcomes of interest, all treated as binary
we considered harm reduction practices (never sharing variables: not sharing needles or syringes in the past
needles or syringes, always keeping a clean needle on 3 months, keeping a new needle on hand in the past
hand), consistent condom use with different types of 3 months, having received an HIV test in the past
sexual partners (including regular, casual, and commer- 12 months, and consistent condom use with any type of
cial partners), and use of HTC. Our evaluation is not de- sexual partner in the past 3 months. We created several
signed to compare implementation models but rather variables to assess exposure to the program model through
assess the effect of the overall package of CPP interven- its different delivery channels: participation in any pro-
tions on HIV risk among PWID. gram activity whether DiC-based or outreach in the past
12 months, participation in both DiC activities and out-
Methods reach in the past 12 months, participation in only DiC ac-
Study population and sampling tivities in the past 12 months, and participation in only
From March to April 2012, we used respondent-driven outreach in the past 12 months. Each variable was coded
sampling (RDS) to recruit 1,035 PWID from four cities as a dichotomous measure, indicating that some respon-
in Yunnan and Guangxi provinces for a behavioral sur- dents were not exposed to any program channel. Other
vey. Sample sizes were as follows: Kunming (n = 336) variables within the analysis included: age, sex, working
and Gejiu (n = 204) in Yunnan and Nanning (n = 355) hours, city of residence, ever use of MMT, ethnicity (Han
and Luzhai (n = 140) in Guangxi. RDS is a chain-referral Chinese or not), education (high school and higher vs. less
Wang et al. Harm Reduction Journal 2014, 11:15 Page 4 of 9
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/11/1/15
than high school), and number of sex acts in the past in MMT centers, PWID who ever used MMT services
3 months. would have had greater opportunity to access outreach
and know about DiCs. This match yielded an L1 distance
Analysis of 2.83E−16, indicating that the matched subsample had
This analysis was intended to be representative of PWID minimal imbalance between those exposed and not ex-
in Yunnan and Guangxi. We used RDSAT to estimate posed to the program.
sampling weights within each city [18]. We then pooled We calculated descriptive statistics for both the full,
the data across all cities and calculated weights for each pooled dataset, and the matched sample. We applied
city based on population size estimates provided by pro- combined RDS and city weights to analyze pooled data.
ject partners. These weights were used in all subsequent For analysis of the matched subsample, we applied one
analyses. combined weight derived from CEM weights, RDS
Because we aimed to test the effectiveness of the CPP weights, and city weights. We then created bivariate and
model, we next used a matching technique, coarsened multivariate logistic regression models, controlling for
exact matching (CEM), to create statistically equivalent ethnicity and education. After assessing the effects of
groups of exposed and nonexposed respondents. This any program participation (not shown), we tested the
quasi-experimental approach allowed us to designate a isolated effects of participation in both DiC and out-
counterfactual (no participation in either DiC or outreach reach, participation in DiC only and participation in out-
activities) when an experimental design was not feasible, reach only. Separate logistic regression models were
given that program implementation was ongoing and was constructed for each treatment variable to isolate the ef-
not designed or implemented with intervention and con- fects of each channel. All analyses were conducted in
trol populations [19-21]. Coarsened exact matching is a Stata 11.
monotonic imbalance matching method designed to re-
duce imbalance between treatment and control groups in
observational data [22]. CEM assigns each case into one of Results
a specified set of strata in which members are exactly Population characteristics
matched on a set of coarsened, or categorized, variables. Table 1 shows the pooled and matched estimate for
Matched cases are then assigned a weight specific to that population characteristics; we only discuss matched
stratum and representative of the proportion of all cases results henceforth. The majority of respondents were
present in the stratum [19-21,23]. We chose CEM over male (67.4%), over 40 years old (51.6%), of Han ethnicity
other matching techniques, such as propensity score (83.3%), and had less than a high school education
matching, to achieve balanced groups, reduce the need for (68.9%). Only 31.1% of respondents were married: the
multiple iterations and re-matching, and maximize the majority had never been married or were widowed or
number of possible matches in our sample [22-24].
In the pooled dataset, we matched survey respondents Table 1 Population characteristics of people who inject
on age (continuous variable coarsened to <40 years, ≥40), drugs in four southwestern Chinese cities in 2012
sex, working hours (coded as end work before 5 p.m./start Population characteristics Pooled Matched
work after 5 p.m./not working vs. all other working hours), sample Sample
resident city, and ever used MMT. We selected these five (n = 1,035) (n = 975)
variables after consultation with program staff because (%) (%)
they were identified as having a substantial influence on Sex (male) 64.0 67.4
PWID's likelihood of participation in the interventions. Age (in years)
Controls were thus defined as people who did not partici- 18 to 30 4.8 7.2
pate in either DiC or outreach, but who were identified,
31 to 40 32.9 41.2
through matching, as having a similar probability of par-
41 to 49 62.3 51.6
ticipation as those who participated in any program activ-
ity. During routine data collection for the program, we Ethnicity (Han) 87.3 83.3
found that older people were more likely to use DiC ser- Education (High school education or above) 32.5 31.1
vices than youths. Peer educators reported that males were Marital status
more likely than females to use DiCs and MMT services. Never married 38.4 42.6
Respondents' working hours could affect their ability to
Currently married 29.9 31.1
visit DiCs during opening hours or participate in outreach.
Divorced or widowed 31.7 26.3
We matched on resident city account for variations in the
political environmental towards drug use and harm reduc- Ever received methadone maintenance 84.7 87.9
treatment (MMT)
tion in each city. Since peer educators conducted outreach
Wang et al. Harm Reduction Journal 2014, 11:15 Page 5 of 9
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/11/1/15
divorced. The use of MMT was very high: nearly 88% of Luzhai (12.9%). CPP staff report that low levels of out-
respondents had received MMT sometime in the past. reach in Nanning are explained by the size of the city
and that there are few qualified outreach workers to
Behavioral outcomes and exposure to DiC and outreach reach the PWID community. The model for outreach is
We present behavioral outcomes and program exposure also different in Guangxi than in Kunming; CPP staff fo-
in Table 2. More than 80% of respondents had injected cused more on TA to build the capacity of community
heroin in the past 3 months. Reported rates for needle rehabilitation centers, government partners, and grass-
and syringe sharing were only 6.2%, much lower than root organizations to conduct outreach. This is a slower
rates reported in the literature. However, less than a model to roll out because on-the-job training is inten-
third (32.3%) of respondents reported keeping clean nee- sive, and it requires a great deal of supervision. The out-
dles on hand. The majority of the respondents reported reach model in Guangxi also required more consensus
having an HIV test during the past year (71.6%). More building and agreement on program goals than the
than half of the respondents reported having sex in the Kunming model, which takes time and can slow down
past 3 months (54.6%), with an average of 13 sex acts program execution. The lack of correlation between ex-
over the course of 3 months. Among those who were posure to outreach and some of the behavioral outcomes
sexually active, 49.3% reported consistent condom use may be attributable to low levels of coverage in places
with all partners during the same period. like Nanning and Luzhai.
Just over half of the respondents reported attending ei- Tables 3, 4, and 5 present results for the pooled and
ther DiC-based activities or receiving outreach during matched samples and show the correlation between pro-
the past 12 months (51.0%). Participation in DiC-based gram exposure and the behavioral outcomes. We present
activities was higher than outreach (43.3% vs. 26.1%). bivariate and multivariate analyses to demonstrate how
About one fifth of the respondents reported attending the models were constructed, but we only focus on the
both DiC-based activities and receiving outreach during matched multivariate analyses here.
the past 12 months (18.4%). Exposure to DiC activities
was the highest in Gejiu (75.5%), approximately 48% for Effectiveness of DiC and outreach on safer injecting practices
both Luzhai and Kunming, and much lower in Nanning Table 3 presents associations between program exposure
(16.9%). Exposure to outreach was highest in Kunming and safer injecting practices. There was a statistically
(36.3%), followed by Gejiu (27.9%), Nanning (18.6%), and significant relationship between participating in both
Table 2 Behavioral outcomes and exposure to drop-in center and outreach activities
Kunming Gejiu Nanning Luzhai Pooled Matched
(n = 336) (n = 204) (n = 355) (n = 140) sample Sample
(n = 1,035) (n = 975)
% % % % % %
Behavioral outcomes
Injected heroin in the past 3 months 72.6 81.4 83.9 81.4 75.8 80.2
Ever shared needles/syringes with others in the past 3 months (among 5.0 0.6 8.6 10.0 5.2 6.2
those who used heroin in the past 3 months)
(n = 244) (n = 166) (n = 298) (n = 114) (n = 822) (n = 762)
Always kept a new needle on hand during the past 3 months (among 26.2 38.8 24.8 29.4 28.0 32.3
those who used heroin in the past 3 months)
Received an HIV test in the past 12 months 67.6 75.9 52.1 66.5 66.5 71.6
Had sexual intercourse in the past 3 months 61.6 46.1 52.4 55.0 57.8 54.6
Mean number of sex acts in the past 3 months 13 10 17 19 14 13
(n = 207) (n = 94) (n = 186) (n = 77) (n = 564) (n = 500)
Used condoms consistently with all partners in the past 3 months (among 38.5 67.0 30.2 45.6 41.4 49.3
those who had sexual intercourse in the past 3 months)
(n = 207) (n = 94) (n = 186) (n = 77) (n = 564) (n = 500)
Program exposure
Participated in either DiC activities or outreach in the past 12 months 58.3 78.4 25.6 51.4 55.9 51.0
Participated in DiC activities and outreach in the past 12 months 25.9 25.0 9.9 10.0 22.8 18.4
Participated in DiC activities only in the past 12 months 22.0 50.5 7.0 38.6 24.2 24.9
Participated in outreach only in the past 12 months 10.4 2.9 8.7 2.9 8.9 7.7
Wang et al. Harm Reduction Journal 2014, 11:15 Page 6 of 9
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/11/1/15
Table 3 Effectiveness of exposure to drop-in center and outreach activities on safer injecting practices
Never shared needles or syringes in the past Always kept a new needle on hand in the past
3 months 3 months
Program exposure Pooled sample (n = 823) Matched sample (n = 762) Pooled sample (n = 823) Matched sample (n = 762)
Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate
OR Adjusted OR Adjusted OR Adjusted OR Adjusted
(95% CI) OR (95% CI) (95% CI) OR (95% CI) (95% CI) OR (95% CI) (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Participated in DiC activities and 1.37 1.32 1.41 1.40 1.50* 1.49* 1.53* 1.53*
outreach in the past 12 months (0.61 to 3.09) (0.59 to 2.99) (0.58 to 3.42) (0.57 to 3.40) (1.05 to 2.14) (1.05 to 2.14) (1.07 to 2.19) (1.07 to 2.19)
Participated in DiC activities 0.80 0.80 0.53 0.55 1.01 1.03 1.27 1.28
only in the past 12 months (0.40 to 1.61) (0.40 to 1.62) (0.26 to 1.09) (0.27 to 1.13) (0.71 to 1.45) (0.71 to 1.47) (0.87 to 1.83) (0.88 to 1.85)
Participated in outreach only 0.53 0.56 0.48 0.53 1.07 1.08 1.03 1.06
in the past 12 months (0.22 to 1.33) (0.22 to 1.39) (0.19 to 1.23) (0.21 to 1.37) (0.62 to 1.85) (0.62 to 1.88) (0.59 to 1.79) (0.61 to 1.86)
*Significant at p < 0.05. Age, gender, respondents' working hours, resident city, and ever use of MMT were matched for the CEM model. Covariates were ethnicity
and education in the separated logistic regression models but not reported here.
DiC-based activities and outreach and having a new nee- different in the intervention sites, we segmented the ana-
dle on hand (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, p < .05). The relation- lysis by Kunming and the other three cities. In Kunming,
ship between exposure to only DiC or only outreach and the program has offered rapid HIV testing in the DiC
either of the two safer injecting practices was not statis- since 2005 and through outreach since 2009. In both set-
tically significant. There was also no relationship be- tings, test results are available in 10 min. In this analysis,
tween both DiC-based activities and outreach and we only found a statistically significant relationship be-
needle or syringe sharing, which was not surprising tween exposure to both DiC-related activities and out-
given the low levels of reported overall sharing (6.2%). reach and testing (OR 2.92, p < .01). There was no
There are several contextual factors that help explain association between exposure to only DiC in Kunming
these findings. The positive relationship between expos- and testing. There was a negative association between ex-
ure to both DiC-related activities and outreach and hav- posure to only outreach in Kunming and testing. An ex-
ing new injecting equipment on hand is likely due to planation for this may be that if referrals from outreach to
behavior change communication (BCC) in DiCs and out- DIC were specifically for testing, then those that did not
reach, especially in 2011 and 2012. There were also attend the DIC may have made a decision not to test.
needle-syringe exchange programs in the Kunming and Similarly, those that used the DIC but without referral
Geiju DiCs and the Nanning CDC, which means that in from an outreach worker may have used the facility for
some cases, BCC is supported by having new injecting services other than testing. Those that used the DIC as a
equipment to give to PWIDs. result of outreach contact, however, may have done so
specifically to be tested for HIV, having been referred to
Effectiveness of DiC and outreach on HIV testing the service by the outreach worker.
Table 4 presents associations between program exposure In Gejiu, Nanning, and Luzhai, only one DiC in Gejiu
and HIV testing. Because the model for testing was offered HIV testing. No immediate HIV testing was
Table 4 Effectiveness of exposure to drop-in center and outreach activities on HIV testing
Tested for HIV in the past 12 months Tested for HIV in the past 12 months
(Kunming) (Gejiu, Nanning, and Luzhai)
Program exposure Pooled sample (n = 335) Matched sample (n = 324) Pooled sample (n = 699) Matched sample (n = 650)
Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate
OR Adjusted OR Adjusted OR Adjusted OR Adjusted
(95% CI) OR (95% CI) (95% CI) OR (95% CI) (95% CI) OR (95% CI) (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Participated in DiC activities 3.51*** 3.50*** 2.79** 2.92** 2.96*** 2.74*** 1.82* 1.73
and outreach in the past (1.80 to 6.85) (1.79 to 6.86) (1.42 to 5.47) (1.47 to 5.78) (1.74 to 5.01) (1.67 to 4.86) (1.06 to 3.14) (1.00 to 2.99)
12 months
Participated in DiC activities 1.44 1.48 1.08 1.10 2.03*** 2.17*** 1.05 1.10
only in the past 12 months (0.82 to 2.54) (0.84 to 2.62) (0.61 to 1.93) (0.62 to 1.98) (1.39 to 2.95) (1.48 to 3.19) (0.71 to 1.56) (0.73 to 1.62)
Participated in outreach only 0.53 0.56 0.44* 0.47* 5.80** 5.78** 3.64* 3.63*
in the past 12 months (0.27 to 1.06) (0.28 to 1.12) (0.22 to 0.88) (0.23 to 0.95) (1.88 to 17.86) (1.87 to 17.89) (1.18 to 11.28) (1.17 to 11.28)
*Significant at p < 0.05; **significant at p < 0.01; ***significant at p < 0.001. Age, gender, respondents' working hours, resident city, and ever use of MMT were
matched for the CEM model. Covariates were ethnicity and education in the separated logistic regression models but not reported here.
Wang et al. Harm Reduction Journal 2014, 11:15 Page 7 of 9
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/11/1/15
Table 5 Effectiveness of exposure to drop-in center and outreach activities on consistent condom use
Consistent condom use with all partners in the past 3 months
Program exposure Pooled sample (n = 564) Matched sample (n = 500)
Bivariate Multivariate Bivariate Multivariate
OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Participated in DiC activities and outreach in the past 2.25*** (1.53 to 3.31) 3.32*** (1.55 to 3.48) 2.00*** (1.35 to 2.97) 3.31*** (1.52 to 3.50)
12 months
Participated in DiC activities only in the past 12 months 1.47* (1.02 to 2.14) 1.43 (0.98 to 2.10) 1.58 (1.06 to 2.33) 1.65* (1.10 to 2.47)
Participated in outreach only in the past 12 months 0.76 (0.42 to 1.39) 0.86 (0.46 to 1.60) 0.83 (0.43 to 1.58) 0.93 (0.48 to 1.80)
*Significant at p < 0.05; ***significant at p < 0.001. Age, gender, respondents' working hours, resident city, and ever use of MMT were matched for the CEM model.
Covariates were ethnicity and education in the separated logistic regression models but not reported here.
offered during outreach activities; referrals were given influence just not injecting practices but the use of HTC
for testing in hospitals and government testing sites. We along with condoms to prevent sexual transmission.
found a statistically significant relationship between ex-
posure to only outreach and testing in these three cities Limitations
(OR 3.63, p < .05). This model of only outreach with re- Our study has several limitations. Study respondents self-
ferrals for testing appears to be working and an appro- reported HIV risk behaviors, and results are subject to so-
priate strategy when testing is not available in DiCs or in cial desirability bias. A limitation of RDS was that it was
areas where there are no DiCs. However, participation in not possible to identify the nonresponse rate in the sample
DiC-based activities in Gejiu, Nanning, and Luzhai was [17,27,28]. For example, we do not know how many at-
not associated with referrals for testing, which suggests tempts were made before three coupons were distributed
that DiC staff did not sufficiently refer PWID to public successfully within PWID social networks. If particular
hospitals or government testing sites. profiles of PWID were more likely to refuse study partici-
pation, there may have been sampling bias. The other limi-
Effectiveness of DiC and outreach on consistent condom use tation of RDS is that although it has features of probability
Table 5 shows associations between program exposure sampling, we could not estimate the extent to which it
and consistent condom use. There was a statistically sig- was truly representative of PWID across the four study cit-
nificant relationship between participating both DiC ac- ies. However, we calculated and applied city weights to im-
tivities and outreach and consistent condom use (OR prove representativeness of the sample. All successful
3.31, p < 0.001), and a statistically significant relationship recruitment waves were between 5 and 12, which suggests
between participating in only DiC-based activities and that the study achieved equilibrium [15,29].
consistent condom use (OR 1.65, p < .05), likely ex- A further limitation is that we may not have fully
plained by the factors noted previously: intensive BCC accounted for factors that influenced selection into the
and the option of speaking with CPP staff in a private CPP program. We attempted to address risks of selection
setting. There was no association between exposure to bias through matching on age, sex, working hours, city resi-
only outreach and consistent condom use. These find- dence, and use of MMT. However, these findings still face
ings indicate that there is a subset of PWID at increased the possibility of omitted variable bias. We were not able to
risk for HIV infection through unprotected sex. account for other factors such as distance to DiCs or indi-
These findings are in line with evidence from else- vidual propensities to participate in health-promoting activ-
where in China that comprehensive, community-based ities. Finally, with the matching technique we used, we may
harm reduction programs can contribute to HIV preven- have increased the number of pairs to be matched at the
tion when designed with the needs of PWID in mind. expense of less exact matching. This is less of a concern
Social marketing of needles in Guangdong and Guangxi with categorical variables than continuous variables. We
has been demonstrated to increase access to clean nee- coarsened continuous variables based on programmatically
dles and safe injection practices [25]. HIV prevalence meaningful categories, and diagnostics of the matching
along the China-Vietnam border declined in the context procedure indicated a high quality match.
of peer outreach and distribution of safe injection equip-
ment [26]. Similarly, HIV and hepatitis B incidences were Conclusion
found to be on the decline among a cohort of PWID in Our analysis demonstrates that comprehensive peer-led
Sichuan providence who received community-based harm programs reduced HIV risk among PWID. Overall, both
reduction programs [2]. Findings from this study suggest DiC-based activities and outreach were successful at in-
how delivery channels for a comprehensive program can creasing safe injecting practices, HTC, and consistent
Wang et al. Harm Reduction Journal 2014, 11:15 Page 8 of 9
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/11/1/15
condom use. Outreach coverage was low, especially in Received: 27 May 2013 Accepted: 10 April 2014
Guangxi province where the implementation model re- Published: 6 May 2014
doi:10.1186/1477-7517-11-15
Cite this article as: Wang et al.: Do community-based strategies reduce
HIV risk among people who inject drugs in China? A quasi-experimental
study in Yunnan and Guangxi provinces. Harm Reduction Journal
2014 11:15.