0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views22 pages

Selection Methods

The document discusses various selection methods in human resource management, focusing on reliability, validity, utility, and legality. It emphasizes the importance of reliable and valid tests for effective hiring, while also addressing issues like similarity bias and social desirability in interviews. Additionally, it highlights the legal framework surrounding discrimination in the hiring process.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views22 pages

Selection Methods

The document discusses various selection methods in human resource management, focusing on reliability, validity, utility, and legality. It emphasizes the importance of reliable and valid tests for effective hiring, while also addressing issues like similarity bias and social desirability in interviews. Additionally, it highlights the legal framework surrounding discrimination in the hiring process.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods

1
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods
Reliability Validity

Utility Legality

2
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Reliability


Reliability refers to consistency of measurement, usually across time but also
across judges

Examples:
• Zero reliability: You step on a weighing scale three times in a row right now and
each time it showed: 80kg, 100kg, 45kg
• Perfect reliability: The IQ test you did gives the same score every time you take
it
• Perfect inter-judge reliability: 5 different interviewers all judged you to have the
same level of social skill

Methods always contain some error or “noise”


3 or unreliability
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Validity


Validity is the extent to which the technique measures the intended knowledge,
skill, ability or other requirements (KSAOs).
Methods that are not valid are useless!
Content validity - degree to which the content of the selection method is
representative of job content.

4
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Validity


Criterion-related validity: How well performance on a selection method
predicts actual job performance
Predictive validity – whether scores on a selection measure correlate with
future job performance

5
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Validity


Concurrent validity – whether scores on a selection measure are related to
job performance levels, when both are measured at roughly the same time

6
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Validity


Concurrent validity –is easy and quick to determine
• But can be problematic to apply if the current workers don’t represent
current job applicants

7
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods
Reliability and validity are two different things
• Tests that are not reliable cannot be valid
• Test that are reliable may not be valid

Example:
Think about IQ test example with perfect reliability. Let’s say that we are looking
to hire some musicians. Using the IQ test, instead of their proficiency in playing a
number of instruments, to select is not valid.

8
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Utility


Utility – refers to the practical economic value of a selection method
• Depends on its validity; but not only… Also:
• Cost of the selection method to develop and to administer

9
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Utility


Variability of job performance – the more variability, the more utility a selection
tool has

10
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Legality


Legality
EU Anti-discrimination Law: Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex,
race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or
belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national
minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be
prohibited.

11
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Selection Methods - Legality

12
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Tests
Tests assess some “s” to
measure “g”
• Test-taking ability matters
(e.g. reading skill, educational
background, practice effects)
• Correlation with job
performance = +0.51

13
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Personality – Big Five Personality


Inventory

14
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Personality – Big Five Personality


Inventory

15
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Personality – MBTI (Myers-


Briggs Type Indicator)
Want to take the
test ?:
https://www.16p
ersonalities.com
/free-
personality-test

16
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Personality – MBTI (Myers-


Briggs Type Indicator)
• Reliability: After 5 weeks, 50% of people’s type changes (Pittenger, 1993; 2005)
• Predictive validity: Reviewing other research, the evidence that MBTI predicts
managerial effectiveness is mixed and inconsistent (Gardner and Martinko, 1996)

17
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Work Sample Tests


• Applicants are asked to perform the exact same tasks that they will be
performing on the job.

• High reliability and validity


• Correlation with job performance = +0.54

Example:
One of Levi Strauss’s work sample tests asks applicants for maintenance and repair
positions to disassemble and reassemble a sewing machine component

18
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Interviews
Social desirability – we say what we think
people want to hear
• Male applicants tend to have higher social
desirability than female applicants (Ones &
Viswesvaran, 1998)
• Older applicants tend to have higher social
desirability than younger applicants (Ones &
Viswesvaran, 1998)
• Knowing this, supplement evaluations with
due diligence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGLal9
wkbYo
19
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Similarity bias
• Similarity bias, or affinity bias, is the phenomenon of preferring individuals whom
we see as similar to ourselves in some way.
• Humans naturally and unconsciously create an “in group” and an “out group” based on
who we think has the same interests, experiences, the same background, or even the
same ethnicity as us. It can subtly influence your hiring decisions, lead you to give
preferential treatment to similar people to yourself and overlook other qualified
candidates.
• It can lead to preferential treatment of certain types of candidates and create an unfair
recruitment process.
• Continuously perpetuating the similar-to-me effect over time leads to reduced company
diversity, a culture of conformity, and one-dimensional thinking and problem-solving.
• Introducing measures like screening candidates with skills tests, anonymous or diverse
panel interviews, inclusive job descriptions, and regular unconscious bias training can go
a long way to reduce all kinds of unconscious biases.
20
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Similarity bias

21
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Similarity
bias

22

You might also like