HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Selection Methods
                            1
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods
                            Reliability       Validity
                              Utility         Legality
                                          2
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Reliability
   Reliability refers to consistency of measurement, usually across time but also
   across judges
   Examples:
   • Zero reliability: You step on a weighing scale three times in a row right now and
   each time it showed: 80kg, 100kg, 45kg
   • Perfect reliability: The IQ test you did gives the same score every time you take
   it
   • Perfect inter-judge reliability: 5 different interviewers all judged you to have the
   same level of social skill
   Methods always contain some error or “noise”
                                          3     or unreliability
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Validity
   Validity is the extent to which the technique measures the intended knowledge,
   skill, ability or other requirements (KSAOs).
   Methods that are not valid are useless!
   Content validity - degree to which the content of the selection method is
   representative of job content.
                                          4
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Validity
   Criterion-related validity: How well performance on a selection method
   predicts actual job performance
   Predictive validity – whether scores on a selection measure correlate with
   future job performance
                                            5
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Validity
   Concurrent validity – whether scores on a selection measure are related to
   job performance levels, when both are measured at roughly the same time
                                           6
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Validity
   Concurrent validity –is easy and quick to determine
   • But can be problematic to apply if the current workers don’t represent
   current job applicants
                                            7
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods
   Reliability and validity are two different things
   • Tests that are not reliable cannot be valid
   • Test that are reliable may not be valid
   Example:
   Think about IQ test example with perfect reliability. Let’s say that we are looking
   to hire some musicians. Using the IQ test, instead of their proficiency in playing a
   number of instruments, to select is not valid.
                                               8
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Utility
   Utility – refers to the practical economic value of a selection method
   • Depends on its validity; but not only… Also:
   • Cost of the selection method to develop and to administer
                                             9
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Utility
   Variability of job performance – the more variability, the more utility a selection
   tool has
                                              10
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Legality
   Legality
   EU Anti-discrimination Law: Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex,
   race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or
   belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national
   minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be
   prohibited.
                                           11
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Selection Methods - Legality
                            12
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Tests
   Tests assess some “s” to
   measure “g”
   • Test-taking ability matters
   (e.g. reading skill, educational
   background, practice effects)
   • Correlation with job
   performance = +0.51
                                      13
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Personality – Big Five Personality
 Inventory
                            14
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Personality – Big Five Personality
 Inventory
                            15
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Personality – MBTI (Myers-
 Briggs Type Indicator)
                                 Want to take the
                                            test ?:
                                 https://www.16p
                                 ersonalities.com
                                            /free-
                                  personality-test
                            16
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Personality – MBTI (Myers-
 Briggs Type Indicator)
   • Reliability: After 5 weeks, 50% of people’s type changes (Pittenger, 1993; 2005)
   • Predictive validity: Reviewing other research, the evidence that MBTI predicts
   managerial effectiveness is mixed and inconsistent (Gardner and Martinko, 1996)
                                            17
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Work Sample Tests
   • Applicants are asked to perform the exact same tasks that they will be
   performing on the job.
   • High reliability and validity
   • Correlation with job performance = +0.54
   Example:
   One of Levi Strauss’s work sample tests asks applicants for maintenance and repair
   positions to disassemble and reassemble a sewing machine component
                                            18
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Interviews
 Social desirability – we say what we think
 people want to hear
 • Male applicants tend to have higher social
 desirability than female applicants (Ones &
 Viswesvaran, 1998)
 • Older applicants tend to have higher social
 desirability than younger applicants (Ones &
 Viswesvaran, 1998)
 • Knowing this, supplement evaluations with
 due diligence
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGLal9
 wkbYo
                                           19
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Similarity bias
 • Similarity bias, or affinity bias, is the phenomenon of preferring individuals whom
   we see as similar to ourselves in some way.
 • Humans naturally and unconsciously create an “in group” and an “out group” based on
   who we think has the same interests, experiences, the same background, or even the
   same ethnicity as us. It can subtly influence your hiring decisions, lead you to give
   preferential treatment to similar people to yourself and overlook other qualified
   candidates.
 • It can lead to preferential treatment of certain types of candidates and create an unfair
   recruitment process.
 • Continuously perpetuating the similar-to-me effect over time leads to reduced company
   diversity, a culture of conformity, and one-dimensional thinking and problem-solving.
 • Introducing measures like screening candidates with skills tests, anonymous or diverse
   panel interviews, inclusive job descriptions, and regular unconscious bias training can go
   a long way to reduce all kinds of unconscious biases.
                                                20
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Similarity bias
                            21
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Similarity
 bias
                            22