a) Write a short essay on the Restoration Comedy of Manners with special reference to any two

playwrights. (The Way of the World -William Congreve, George Etherege)/18TH Century drama/
Sentimental Comedy)

The Restoration Comedy of Manners is a distinct genre of drama that emerged in England during the late
17th century, after the restoration of the monarchy in 1660. This period, often referred to as the Restoration,
saw the return of Charles II to the throne, leading to a cultural shift marked by greater openness and social
freedom. The Comedy of Manners is characterized by sharp dialogue, satirical depictions of society, and a
focus on the manners and morals of the upper class. The genre reflects the sophistication, hypocrisy, and
superficiality of aristocratic society, and two of the most notable playwrights of this tradition are William
Congreve and George Etherege.

William Congreve’s The Way of the World is often regarded as the epitome of Restoration Comedy. The
play examines the complexities of love, marriage, and social intrigue in a society where appearances and
status often take precedence over genuine emotion. The central characters, Mirabell and Millamant, are
witty, sophisticated, and often manipulative. They navigate a world where social conventions, money, and
power shape relationships. The famous “proviso scene,” in which Mirabell and Millamant negotiate the
terms of their marriage, illustrates the transactional nature of relationships within the upper class. This scene
is a striking example of how Congreve uses sharp dialogue and clever wordplay to reveal the artificial
nature of these social arrangements. The scene also highlights the play’s central theme: the idea that love
and marriage are often treated as business deals rather than matters of affection.

Through The Way of the World, Congreve critiques the moral corruption of the aristocracy while
simultaneously entertaining the audience with humor and wit. The characters’ manipulation of each other,
their scheming, and their pursuit of social advancement expose the shallow values of Restoration society.
Congreve’s portrayal of the characters is both humorous and satirical, highlighting the pretensions of the
upper class. The play's sharp dialogue and sophisticated wit make it one of the greatest examples of
Restoration Comedy, providing a biting commentary on the moral and social values of the time.

George Etherege’s The Man of Mode is another significant work within the Restoration Comedy of
Manners. Written in the late 17th century, it also satirizes the superficial nature of high society. The
protagonist, Dorimant, is a charming, witty, and self-serving young man who engages in various romantic
entanglements. Through Dorimant and other characters, Etherege explores themes of vanity, desire, and
social maneuvering. The characters in The Man of Mode are often more concerned with appearances than
with true feelings, using their charm and wit to manipulate others for personal gain. The play is filled with
humorous dialogue and situations that underscore the artificiality of social conventions.

Etherege’s The Man of Mode offers a sharp critique of the moral decay of the upper class, much like
Congreve’s work. However, Etherege’s style is somewhat lighter, and his characters tend to be more
focused on wit and seduction than on the complexities of marriage and social maneuvering seen in The Way
of the World. Despite this difference in focus, both playwrights use their works to expose the hypocrisy,
greed, and pretensions of the aristocracy. The characters in both plays often embody exaggerated traits,
serving as vehicles for social satire. Through these exaggerated portrayals, the plays offer a mirror to the
moral flaws and foolishness of human nature, making the audience reflect on the social order of the time.

The Restoration Comedy of Manners also represents a shift from earlier forms of comedy, particularly
sentimental comedy, which became popular in the 18th century. Sentimental comedies typically focused on
moral lessons, virtuous characters, and emotional appeal. In contrast, the Comedy of Manners relied heavily
on wit, irony, and satire, placing less emphasis on moral instruction and more on exposing the flaws and
 pretensions of society. The plays were more concerned with mocking the artificiality of social conventions
than with providing moral guidance. This made the Comedy of Manners a more sophisticated and
intellectually stimulating form of drama, appealing to a more refined audience that enjoyed the sharp humor
and social critique of the plays.

Both Congreve and Etherege use their works to explore the social and moral issues of their time, particularly
the hypocrisy and superficiality of the upper class. The characters they create are often exaggerated versions
of real people, and their actions serve to highlight the flaws in society. Through clever dialogue, dramatic
irony, and humorous situations, both playwrights engage their audiences, entertaining them while also
making them think critically about the world around them.

In conclusion, the Restoration Comedy of Manners is a significant genre of drama that emerged during a
time of great social change in England. Playwrights like William Congreve and George Etherege used wit,
satire, and clever dialogue to critique the moral and social values of their era. Their plays, such as The Way
of the World and The Man of Mode, provide both entertainment and sharp social commentary, exposing the
hypocrisy, vanity, and superficiality of the aristocratic society. The genre remains influential today, offering
a timeless insight into the manners and morals of the past. The Restoration Comedy of Manners continues to
be celebrated for its witty characters, clever wordplay, and satirical examination of society.

2. OLD ANSWERS CORRECTION, William Congreve, George Etherege)/

The Restoration Comedy of Manners emerged in England during the late 17th century, following the
Restoration of Charles II in 1660. This genre is characterized by its focus on the behaviors, values, and intrigues
of the upper classes, often employing wit, irony, and social commentary. Playwrights such as William Congreve
and George Etherege were instrumental in shaping this theatrical form, using humor and satire to critique
societal norms and explore the complexities of love and relationships.

William Congreve is perhaps the most celebrated playwright of Restoration comedy, and his work The Way of
the World serves as a quintessential example of the genre. In this play, Congreve masterfully weaves a plot
filled with deception, romance, and social maneuvering. The central characters, Mirabell and Millamant,
navigate the intricacies of love and societal expectations in a world governed by appearances and cunning.
Their sharp banter reflects not only their intelligence but also the intricacies of courtship in their society.

Congreve’s characters are often defined by their wit and sophistication, embodying the ideals and follies of the
upper classes. The play’s exploration of themes such as marriage, gender roles, and the hypocrisy of social
conventions showcases Congreve’s keen observation of human behavior. Through the interplay of clever
dialogue and intricate plotting, he critiques the superficiality of societal norms while celebrating the potential
for genuine connection. The Way of the World stands out for its nuanced portrayal of relationships, allowing
audiences to see the complexities behind the seemingly glamorous lives of the elite.

In contrast, George Etherege took a different approach in his comedy. His play The Man of Mode focuses more
on the moral dilemmas and emotional depth of its characters. While still embodying elements of Restoration
comedy, Etherege introduces a sense of sincerity and genuine emotion that sets his work apart. The plot centers
around the character of Dorimant, a witty, charming, and self-interested man who navigates the complexities of
love, lust, and social ambition in Restoration London.

Etherege’s characters, like those in Congreve’s works, are concerned with appearances and personal
advancement, but Etherege’s tone is often more lighthearted and focused on witty banter. The Man of Mode
satirizes the behavior of Restoration society while exploring themes of vanity, desire, and the manipulation of
others for personal gain. The characters are often portrayed as self-serving, using their charm and social skills to
secure their positions in a world ruled by fashion and social stratification. Etherege’s work highlights the
performative nature of relationships in his society, where appearances are often more important than genuine
emotional connection.

Both Congreve and Etherege used their plays to critique the moral and social values of their time. They
highlight the hypocrisy, greed, and superficiality of the upper class, while also entertaining the audience with
clever dialogue and humorous situations. The characters in these plays are often exaggerated and larger-than-
life, but they reflect the real flaws and follies of human nature. Through witty banter, dramatic irony, and satire,
both playwrights expose the excesses and pretensions of Restoration society.

The Restoration Comedy of Manners also reflected the cultural and social changes of the period. With the
reopening of the theatres and the influence of the French court, there was a newfound interest in urban life,
fashion, and the complexities of social interaction. The comedies often served as mirrors to contemporary
society, highlighting the follies and pretensions of the upper classes. This self-reflexive quality allowed
audiences to engage critically with their own values and behaviors, making the theatre a site for both
entertainment and social commentary.

In conclusion, the Restoration Comedy of Manners played a crucial role in the evolution of English theatre,
with playwrights like William Congreve and George Etherege offering distinct yet complementary perspectives
on love and society. Congreve’s witty and intricate plots expose the superficiality of upper-class life, while
Etherege’s exploration of vanity and desire in a world of social ambition highlights the moral complexities of
his characters. Together, their works illustrate the richness of Restoration comedy, highlighting its capacity to
entertain while simultaneously challenging social norms. This genre laid the groundwork for subsequent
developments in English theatre, influencing future playwrights and shaping the trajectory of comedic drama.
 Harlem
MARKS-15

1.Bringout the significance of images in Langston Hughes poem “Harlem” / Comment on the poetic
style of Langston Hughes with reference to “Harlem”./ Comment on the fution of theme and style in
Langston Hughes poem “Harlem”

+
2. Langston Hughes poem “Harlem to be Answered” uses poetry to explore racial
discrimination.Discuss / The poem “Harlem” deals with the “black experience” of the 1920’s . Discuss /
Langston Hughes poem “Harlem” is an intensely personal utterance . Do you agree? Justify your
answers / Show how in 'Harlem' Langton Hughes underscores the unsolved tensions that characterised the
African-American experience during his time

Langston Hughes, one of the most influential figures of the Harlem Renaissance, is known for his powerful
exploration of race, identity, and social issues. His poem "Harlem" delves deep into the theme of racial
discrimination, using poetic style and vivid imagery to convey the struggles of African Americans in a society
plagued by inequality. Through the poem, Hughes poses important questions about the consequences of
unfulfilled dreams and how racial discrimination creates barriers to progress. By employing simple language
and striking imagery, Hughes captures the emotional weight of discrimination and gives a voice to those who
have been oppressed.

In "Harlem," Hughes uses a question-and-answer structure to introduce the main theme. The opening line,
"What happens to a dream deferred?" immediately engages the reader, inviting them to reflect on the fate of
dreams that are left unrealized. The word "deferred" implies something that is postponed or delayed, suggesting
that African Americans' dreams of equality and opportunity are constantly pushed aside due to racial
discrimination. By beginning the poem with a question, Hughes makes the reader feel the sense of uncertainty
and frustration experienced by those who face discrimination.

The structure of the poem is significant in conveying the sense of hopelessness that comes from discrimination.
Hughes does not provide an answer to the question directly, instead offering a series of possibilities about what
happens to a dream that is deferred. Each of these possibilities uses vivid imagery to convey the emotional and
physical toll of racial injustice. The second line, "Does it dry up / like a raisin in the sun?" compares a dream to
a raisin that shrivels and loses its vitality. This image suggests that dreams, when denied or ignored, lose their
power and beauty over time. It conveys the feeling that racial discrimination slowly drains the life out of hope,
leaving it shriveled and unimportant.

Hughes continues to explore the consequences of deferred dreams through other striking metaphors. In the third
line, he asks, "Or fester like a sore / And then run?" The image of a festering sore symbolizes how deep-rooted
racial discrimination causes pain and suffering that grows worse over time if left untreated. The word "run"
suggests that this pain can spread, infecting not only the individual but also society as a whole. Hughes is
warning that the longer racial discrimination continues unchecked, the more damaging and widespread its
effects will become.
In the following lines, Hughes offers another vivid metaphor: "Does it stink like rotten meat?" Here, the dream
is compared to something decaying and foul-smelling, which reflects the idea that dreams deferred by racism
become corrupted and tainted. The image of rotting meat evokes disgust, implying that racial discrimination not
only harms those directly affected but also poisons society’s moral fabric. The dream, once full of hope and
potential, becomes something unpleasant and repulsive, symbolizing how the oppression of African Americans
has degraded their humanity in the eyes of society.

The next question Hughes asks is, "Or crust and sugar over / like a syrupy sweet?" This image evokes the idea
of a dream that has been covered up or hidden beneath a sweet exterior. The crust and sugar suggest a false
sense of comfort or satisfaction, implying that society might try to mask the pain of racial discrimination with
superficial solutions. However, Hughes suggests that such attempts are ultimately shallow and fail to address
the deeper issues at hand. The sweetness of the syrupy exterior hides the bitterness underneath, symbolizing
how society may ignore or downplay the effects of racial discrimination.

In the final lines of the poem, Hughes offers the possibility that a dream deferred might "sag / like a heavy
load." This image evokes the weight of oppression and the burden that racial discrimination places on the
shoulders of African Americans. The dream, once a source of hope and motivation, has become a heavy and
overwhelming weight, making it harder for individuals to move forward or achieve their goals. The burden of
racism affects not only the individual but also the collective spirit of the community.

Hughes ends the poem with a powerful, unresolved statement: "Or does it explode?" The explosion suggests
that the pent-up frustration and anger from years of racial discrimination could eventually lead to violent
outbursts or social upheaval. It is a stark warning that the continued denial of dreams and rights can lead to
serious consequences, and society must address these issues before they reach a breaking point.

Through the use of simple yet powerful language and vivid imagery, Langston Hughes explores the damaging
effects of racial discrimination in "Harlem." By posing the question of what happens to deferred dreams, he
highlights the emotional and social consequences of racial inequality. The images of shriveled raisins, festering
sores, rotting meat, and heavy loads convey the deep sense of pain, frustration, and hopelessness that comes
from living in a society where racial discrimination holds people back from achieving their dreams. The poem
serves as a call to action, urging society to confront its injustices before it is too late.

alternative

Langston Hughes, a central figure of the Harlem Renaissance, was a poet who used his words to give voice
to the struggles, hopes, and dreams of African Americans. His poem "Harlem" (also known as "A Dream
Deferred") is a profound exploration of racial discrimination and its crushing impact on the lives of Black
individuals. Written in 1951, during a time of deep racial segregation and inequality in America, the poem
captures the frustration and despair of a community whose dreams were repeatedly denied. Through vivid
imagery and a simple yet powerful poetic style, Hughes invites readers to reflect on the consequences of
racial injustice, making the poem both timeless and universally relatable.

The beauty of "Harlem" lies in its simplicity. Hughes uses short, direct lines and everyday language, making
the poem accessible to everyone. This simplicity mirrors the lived experiences of ordinary people,
emphasizing that racial discrimination is not an abstract concept but a harsh reality. The poem begins with a
question: "What happens to a dream deferred?" This opening line sets the tone for the entire poem, creating
a sense of curiosity and urgency. By framing the poem as a series of questions, Hughes draws readers into a
deeper reflection on the consequences of unfulfilled dreams.

The structure of the poem is open-ended, with no definitive answers provided. Instead, Hughes offers a
series of vivid images that suggest possible outcomes of a deferred dream. This approach allows readers to
interpret the poem in their own way, making it more personal and impactful. The lack of resolution also
reflects the uncertainty and anxiety felt by African Americans during this time, as they grappled with the
constant denial of their aspirations.

Hughes’ use of imagery in "Harlem" is both striking and thought-provoking. Each image represents a
different consequence of deferred dreams, ranging from frustration to despair. For instance, the line "Does it
dry up like a raisin in the sun?" uses the metaphor of a dried-up raisin to symbolize the loss of hope and
vitality. Just as a grape shrivels and loses its sweetness when exposed to the sun, the dreams of African
Americans wither under the harsh conditions of racism. This image captures the slow, painful erosion of
hope that comes with repeated disappointment.

Another powerful image is "Or fester like a sore—And then run?" Here, Hughes compares a deferred dream
to an untreated wound that becomes infected and painful. This metaphor conveys the idea that unaddressed
racial injustice can lead to deep emotional and psychological scars. The word "fester" suggests that the pain
is not only physical but also emotional, highlighting the long-term damage caused by discrimination. The
image of a running sore evokes a sense of urgency, as if the pain is spreading and becoming harder to
ignore.

The line "Does it stink like rotten meat?" introduces the idea of decay and neglect. A dream that is
constantly postponed becomes like spoiled food, emitting a foul odor that cannot be ignored. This image
reflects the frustration and anger felt by African Americans who are denied opportunities and forced to live
in poverty and hardship. The use of the word "stink" also implies that the consequences of racial
discrimination affect not only the oppressed but also society as a whole. The decay of dreams becomes a
shared burden, one that cannot be easily dismissed.

The tone of "Harlem" is reflective and somber, capturing the weight of racial discrimination. Hughes does
not shy away from addressing the harsh realities faced by African Americans, and his words carry a sense of
urgency and despair. The mood of the poem shifts from curiosity to frustration and finally to a sense of
hopelessness. This progression mirrors the emotional journey of African Americans who, despite their
efforts, are unable to achieve their dreams due to systemic barriers.

The final line of the poem, "Or does it explode?" is particularly striking. It suggests that the accumulated
frustration and anger caused by racial discrimination can lead to a violent outburst. This image of an
explosion serves as a warning about the potential consequences of ignoring racial injustice. It implies that if
society continues to oppress African Americans, the resulting anger and resentment could have devastating
effects. This line leaves readers with a sense of unease, urging them to consider the broader implications of
racial inequality.

While "Harlem" is rooted in the African American experience, its themes of discrimination and deferred
dreams resonate deeply with people across the world, including in India. In India, many marginalized
communities, such as Dalits, Adivasis, and religious minorities, face systemic discrimination that prevents
them from achieving their full potential. Hughes’ imagery of a dream deferred can be applied to the
struggles of these communities, who often face barriers in education, employment, and social mobility. The
poem serves as a reminder of the importance of addressing inequality and ensuring that everyone has the
opportunity to pursue their dreams.

In "Harlem," Langston Hughes uses simple yet powerful language, vivid imagery, and a reflective tone to
explore the impact of racial discrimination on African Americans. Through metaphors of decay, frustration,
and explosion, he conveys the emotional and psychological toll of deferred dreams. The poem’s universal
themes make it relevant not only to the African American experience but also to other communities facing
discrimination and inequality. By highlighting the consequences of racial injustice, Hughes calls for a more
just and equitable society where everyone has the opportunity to thrive. His work remains a timeless
reminder of the importance of fighting for equality and justice.