226302001-KM-03 Learner Manual
226302001-KM-03 Learner Manual
                                                                              1
  KT0304 EXPLAIN WHERE THE THRESHOLD LIMITS FOR THE VARIOUS OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE
  MEASUREMENTS CAN BE OBTAINED__________________________________________________111
KM-03-KT04: PRINCIPLES OF SAFE WORKING PRACTICES IN AND AROUND THE PLACE OF
WORK (INTERMEDIATE)_______________________________________________________127
 KT0401 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE SAFETY PRACTICES REQUIRED FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENTS.
 ________________________________________________________________________________128
  KT0402 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICES RELEVANT TO THE
  MACHINERY, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT USED IN WORK ENVIRONMENTS._____________________130
  KT0403 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE SPECIFIC SAFETY PRACTICES REQUIRED FOR THE RANGE OF
  WORK ACTIVITIES RELEVANT TO A SPECIFIC WORK AREA._________________________________141
  KT0404 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE RELEVANT TO
  WORK AREAS.____________________________________________________________________145
KM-03-KT05: CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR EFFECTIVE DOCUMENTATION AND DOCUMENT
CONTROL___________________________________________________________________155
  KT0501 EXPLAIN THE DOCUMENT AND RECORD CLASSIFICATION PROCESS FOR OCCUPATIONAL
  HEALTH AND STATUTORY DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS (LONG RETENTION PERIOD________156
  KT0502 DESCRIBE THE PRINCIPLES FOR RECORD KEEPING AND ARCHIVING DOCUMENTS._______160
  KT0503 DESCRIBE THE PRINCIPLES FOR BACKUP AND RETENTION OF CRITICAL DOCUMENTS AND
  RECORDS________________________________________________________________________164
  KT0504. EXPLAIN THE PRINCIPLES OF DOCUMENT AND RECORD SECURITY___________________176
  KT0505 DESCRIBE THE CRITERIA FOR THE QUALITY OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
  DOCUMENTATION_________________________________________________________________186
KM-03-KT06: CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES OF CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS AND HOW THIS
APPLIES TO OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT AND INCIDENT
AND ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION_________________________________________________190
  KT0601 DEFINE WHAT IS MEANT BY CAUSE AND EFFECT AND GIVE EXAMPLES OF HOW THIS APPLIES
  TO HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT AND ACCIDENT/INCIDENT INVESTIGATION_____191
  KT0602 EXPLAIN HOW A CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS WORKS AND HOW IT APPLIES TO RISK
  ASSESSMENT, HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND INCIDENT/ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION.___________195
  KT0603 EXPLAIN WHAT IS MEANT BY PREVENTATIVE, CORRECTIVE AND CONTINGENCY ACTIONS
  AND GIVE EXAMPLES OF HOW THIS IS APPLIED IN HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT AND
  ACCIDENT/INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS.________________________________________________200
KM-03-KT07: PRINCIPLES, CONCEPTS AND PROCESSES OF HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL____________________________________________________214
KM-03-KT08: CONCEPTS, PRINCIPLES AND LEADING PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT__________________________________________________215
  KT0801 DESCRIBE WHAT IS MEANT BY CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AND HOW IT MANIFESTS IN
  THE PLAN, DO, CHECK, ACT CYCLE_____________________________________________________216
                                                                             2
 KT0802 GIVE EXAMPLES OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES IN VARIOUS WORK PLACES.
 ________________________________________________________________________________229
 KT0803 DESCRIBE THE ADVANTAGES AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE EFFECTIVE USE OF CONTINUOUS
 IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES._________________________________________________________236
 KT0804 EXPLAIN THE TYPICAL PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
 PROCESSES_______________________________________________________________________242
 KT0805 EXPLAIN THE IMPORTANCE OF STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS IN ENSURING
 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT._______________________________________________________256
KM-03-KT09: CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT AND HOW TO APPLY
THESE PRINCIPLES WHEN IMPLEMENTING NEW SYSTEMS____________________________257
 KT0901DEFINE CHANGE AND GIVE REASONS WHY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES IN AN
 ORGANISATION MUST BE MANAGED__________________________________________________258
 KT0902 EXPLAIN THE TYPICAL RESPONSES OF PEOPLE TO CHANGE AND HOW THEY IMPACT ON THE
 EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTING CHANGES IN ORGANISATIONS._________________________263
 KT0903 DESCRIBE A TYPICAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND GIVE EXAMPLES OF WHAT
 MUST BE DONE TO HELP PEOPLE UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT CHANGE.______________________269
 KT0904 GIVE EXAMPLES OF THE USE OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT IN RELATION TO OCCUPATIONAL
 HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES.________________________________________________________271
                                                                          3
© COPYRIGHT
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
Transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise, without the prior written permission of:
This manual was compiled by SM Support o9n behalf of the training provider.
                                                                                       4
HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE
This workbook belongs to you. It is designed to serve as a guide for the duration of your
training programme.     It contains readings, activities, and application aids that will assist you
in developing the knowledge and skills stipulated in the specific outcomes and assessment
criteria. Follow along in the guide as the facilitator takes you through the material, and feel
free to make notes and diagrams that will help you to clarify or retain information. Jot down
things that work well or ideas that come from the group. Also, note any points you would like
to explore further. Participate actively in the skill practice activities, as they will give you an
opportunity to gain insights from other people’s experiences and to practice the skills. Do not
forget to share your own experiences so that others can learn from you too.
ICONS
Learner Manual
PROGRAMME OVERVIEW
PURPOSE
The main focus of the learning in this knowledge module is to build an understanding of the
9key theories, concepts and principles required to process the required data and provide
Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene services in the capacity as a Safety and Health
Officer
LEARNING ASSUMPTIONS
This programme has been aligned to registered unit standards. You will be assessed against
the outcomes of the unit standards by completing a knowledge assignment that covers the
essential embedded knowledge stipulated in the unit standards. When you are assessed as
competent against the unit standards, you will receive a certificate of competence and be
awarded 17 credits towards a National Qualification.
     1. Physical Requirements:
            Training venue/classroom, chairs, desks and tables
            Training material and resources
           The trainer must have an NQF Level 4 or higher Early Childhood Development
           Qualification or equivalent
           Registered Assessor with ETDP SETA is a recommendation
           The trainer with facilitation skills is a recommendation
           Trainer to learner ratio: 1:30 (Maximum)
3. Legal Requirements
           Legal Entity
           Accredited skills development provider with ETDP SETA
           Compliant with Occupational Health and Safety legislation and requirements
   On completion of this section you will be able to understand the principles, concepts and
   processes of hazard identification, risk assessment and control
The most important legal duty imposed on employers by the Occupational Health and Safety
Act, 1993 and incorporated Regulations is the one requiring of employers to conduct Risk
Assessments (HIRA – Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment). Based on the outcome of
the Risk Assessments decisions should be taken as to preventative measures to be
implemented as to ensure a safe workplace is provided to employees, contractors and
visitors to the workplace
Risk assessments to be conducted could be divided into the following three types;
The frequency at which these Risk Assessment reports should be reviewed is not prescribed.
It is however common that annual reviews are required;
   ii.      After an incident - During the incident investigation process weaknesses with internal
            policies or procedures could have been identified. The incident investigation may also
            show additional precautionary measures are required as to prevent a re-occurrence;
            and or
  iii.      When new legislation was promulgated – New legislation may prescribe requirements
            which are currently not being complied with. Assessing the contents of the legislation
            will show these non-conformances and will allow employers to ensure compliance;
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                                   11
Learner Manual
A step-by-step process
A safe and healthy workplace does not happen by chance or guesswork. You have to think
about what could go wrong at your workplace and what the consequences could be. Then
you must do whatever you can (whatever is ‘reasonably practicable’) to eliminate or minimise
health and safety risks arising from your business or undertaking.
Risk management is a proactive process that helps respond to change and facilitate
continuous improvement. It will be planned, systematic and cover all reasonably foreseeable
hazards and associated risks
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                           12
Learner Manual
A piece of plant, substance or a work process may have many different hazards. Each of
these hazards needs to be identified. For example, a production line may have dangerous
moving parts, noise, hazards associated with manual tasks and psychological hazards due to
the pace of work.
Hazards are not always obvious. Some hazards can affect health over a long period of time
or may result in stress (such as bullying) or fatigue (such as long working hours). Also think
about hazards that we may bring into your workplace as such as new, used or hired goods.
As you walk around, you may spot straightforward problems and action should be taken on
these immediately, for example cleaning up a spill, putting away items into their correct place.
If you find a situation where there is immediate or significant danger to people, move those
persons to a safer location first and attend to the hazard urgently.
Make a list of all the hazards you can find, including the ones you know are already being
dealt with, to ensure that nothing is missed.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                                  14
Learner Manual
Consult workers Ask other workers about any health and safety problems they have
encountered in doing their work and any near misses or incidents that have not been
reported.
Worker surveys may also be undertaken to obtain information about matters such as
workplace bullying, as well as muscular aches and pains that can signal potential hazards.
Physical Hazards
          Flammable gases
          Flammable aerosols
          Oxidizing gases
          Gases under pressure
          Flammable liquids
          Flammable solids
          Self-reactive substances and mixtures
          Pyrophoric liquids
          Pyrophoric solids
          Self-heating substances and mixtures
          Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases
          Oxidizing liquids
          Oxidizing solids
          Organic peroxides
          Corrosive to metals
          Combustible dusts
          Simple asphyxiants
          Pyrophoric gases
          Physical hazards not otherwise classified
Health Hazards
          Acute toxicity
          Skin corrosion/irritation
          Serious eye damage/eye irritation
          Respiratory or skin sensitization
          Germ cell mutagenicity
          Carcinogenicity
          Reproductive toxicity
          Specific target organ toxicity – single exposure
          Specific target organ toxicity – repeated exposure
          Aspiration hazard
          Biohazardous infectious materials
          Health hazards not otherwise classified
Each hazard class contains at least one category. The hazard categories are assigned a
number (e.g., 1, 2, etc.) Categories may also be called "types". Types are assigned an
alphabetical letter (e.g., A, B, etc.). In a few cases, sub-categories are also specified.
Subcategories are identified with a number and a letter (e.g., 1A and 1B).
Some hazard classes have only one category (e.g., corrosive to metals), others may have
two categories (e.g., carcinogenicity (cancer)) or three categories (e.g., oxidizing liquids).
There are a few hazard classes with five or more categories (e.g., organic peroxides).
The category tells you about how hazardous the product is (that is, the severity of hazard).
          Category 1 is always the greatest level of hazard (that is, it is the most hazardous
           within that class). If Category 1 is further divided, Category 1A within the same hazard
           class is a greater hazard than category 1B.
          Category 2 within the same hazard class is more hazardous than category 3, and so
           on.
There are a few exceptions to this rule. For example, for the Gases under pressure hazard
class, the hazard categories are "Compressed gas", "Liquefied gas", "Refrigerated liquefied
gas" and "Dissolved gas". These classes relate to the physical state of the gas when
packaged and do not describe the degree of hazard.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          16
Learner Manual
In addition, the Reproductive Toxicity hazard class has a separate category called "Effects on
or via lactation". "Effects on or via lactation" was not assigned a specific numbered category.
Reproductive toxicity also has Categories 1 and 2 which relate to effects on fertility and/or the
unborn child. Effects on or via lactation is considered a different, but related hazard within the
Reproductive toxicity class
How will I know what hazard class or category is assigned to a hazardous product?
Suppliers must evaluate products that are covered by the Hazardous Products Act against
specific criteria as required by the Hazardous Products Regulations. If the product meets any
of the criteria for a hazard class, it is known as a hazardous product. All hazardous products
must be labelled according to the regulations and must have a corresponding Safety Data
Sheet (SDS).
Each hazard class or category must use specific pictograms and other label elements to
indicate the hazard that is present, and what precautionary measures must be taken. Use the
information provided by the label and SDS to be informed and to know how to safely use,
handle, store and dispose of the hazardous product Suppliers must evaluate products that
are covered by the Hazardous Products Act against specific criteria as required by the
Hazardous Products Regulations. If the product meets any of the criteria for a hazard class, it
is known as a hazardous product.
All hazardous products must be labelled according to the regulations and must have a
corresponding Safety Data Sheet (SDS). The hazard class and category will be provided in
Section 2 (Hazard Identification) of the SDS. Each hazard class or category must use specific
pictograms and other label elements to indicate the hazard that is present, and what
precautionary measures must be taken. Use the information provided by the label and SDS to
be informed and to know how to safely use, handle, store and dispose of the hazardous
product
Risk identification is the first step in the proactive risk management process. It provides the
opportunities, indicators, and information that allows an organization to raise major risks
before they adversely affect operations and hence the business.
Risk Statements
Before a risk can be managed, the operations staff must clearly and consistently express it in
the form of a risk statement.
The second part of the risk statement is a second natural language statement called the
consequence and describes the undesirable attribute or state of affairs. The two statements
are linked by a term such as "therefore" or "and as a result" that implies an uncertain (less
than 100 percent) but causal relationship. The two-part formulation process for risk
statements has the advantage of coupling the risk consequences with observable (and
potentially controllable) risk conditions early in the risk identification stage.
Root Cause
When formulating a risk statement, the operations staff should consider the root cause or
originating source, of the risk condition. Understanding root causes can help to identify
additional, related risks. There are four main sources of risk in IT operations:
          People - Even if a group's processes and technology are flawless, human actions
           (whether accidental or deliberate) can put the business at risk.
          Process - Flawed or badly documented processes can put the business at risk even if
           they are followed perfectly.
          Technology - The IT staff may precisely follow a perfectly designed process yet fail to
           meet business goals because of problems with the hardware, software, and so on.
          Environment - Some factors are beyond the IT group's control but can still affect the
           infrastructure in a way that harms the business. Natural events such as earthquakes
           and floods fall into this category, as do externally generated, man-made problems,
           such as civil unrest or changes to government regulations
Downstream Effect
The risk identification process results in the identification of the outcome, or downstream
effect, of the risk. Understanding downstream effects (total loss or opportunity cost) can help
in correctly evaluating the impact that the consequence will have on an organization. There
are four main ways in which operational risk consequences can affect the business:
          Cost - The infrastructure can work properly, but at too high a cost, causing too little
           return on investment (ROI).
          Performance - The infrastructure can fail to meet users' expectations, either because
           the expectations were unrealistic, or because the infrastructure performs incorrectly.
           The reliability of a system can also affect the users' perceptions of the service's
           performance.
          Capability - The infrastructure can fail to provide the platform or the components
           needed for end-to-end services to function properly or even function at all. For
           example, consider an enterprise e-mail system that relies upon mail servers, storage
           servers, gateways or message transfer agents (MTAs), network components, and
           desktop components. A failure in any one of these components would affect the e-
           mail service and hence impact the business' capability to communicate effectively.
          Security - The infrastructure can harm the business by not providing enough
           protection for data and resources, or by enforcing so much security that legitimate
           users cannot access data and resources.
Understanding the characteristics of downstream effect is critical later in the risk identification
process when ranking risks to ensure that the most important ones get the attention they
deserve since a risk may have a high operational consequence but a low downstream effect,
or vice versa.
The following figure schematically depicts the risk identification process along with an
example
Risks List
The minimum output from risk identification activities is a clear, unambiguous, consensus
statement of the risks being faced by the IT operations staff, which is recorded as a risks list.
The risk identification step frequently generates a large amount of other useful information,
including the identification of root causes and downstream effects, affected service, owner,
and so forth.
An example of a risks list produced during the identification step is depicted in the following
table. The risks list in tabular form is the main input for the next stage (analysis) of the risk
management process and will become the master risks list used during the subsequent
management process steps.
Best Practices
These best practices will be beneficial during the risk identification step.
A great deal can be learned from reviewing risk databases from similar tasks, talking to
process owners about risk management activities in their areas, and reading case studies
that identify risks to services or processes. An optimized and mature risk management
discipline involves capturing knowledge and best practices from operational activities through
the application of such basic knowledge management techniques as consistent taxonomy,
risk classification, document management, and advanced search capabilities.
Continual Identification
When a group adopts risk management, the first step is often a brainstorming session to
identify risks. Identification does not end with this meeting. Identification happens as often as
changes are able to affect the IT infrastructure-which is to say, identification happens every
day.
Discussions
Identification discussions are very important. A key to their success is to represent all relevant
viewpoints, including stakeholders as well as different segments of the operations staff. This
is a powerful way to expose assumptions and differing viewpoints. The ultimate goal of the
identification discussion is to improve the organization's risk management capability.
Cause-Effect Matrix
The set of all possible conditions is nearly infinite, and the sheer volume can make it difficult
for the operations staff to focus on one at a time, especially during brainstorming. An effective
solution, and one that has benefits later in the process, is to subdivide all of the possible
conditions into a table with one row for each of the four causes of risk and one column for
each of the four types of downstream effect
It is now much easier to focus on one cell of the table at a time. For example, IT operations
staff might ask themselves, "How might people in the operations group make mistakes that
would cause us to do the right work at too high a cost?" Or they might ask, "How could our
technology fail to meet customers' performance expectations?" Or more specifically, "How
might hardware problems cause the sales group's order entry system to bog down?"
A helpful way to present the information gathered during this step is through a risk statement
form, which may add information that will be valuable later during the risk tracking step. In
addition to the four parts of the risk statement (root cause, condition, consequence, and
downstream effect), a statement form including the following can be very useful:
          Role or function - The service management function (SMF) most directly involved with
           the risk situation.
          Related service - Service most affected by the risk.
          Context - A paragraph containing additional background information that helps to
           clarify the risk situation.
          Related risks and dependencies among risks - Identify where the consequences of a
           risk may also be the root cause of or have a direct impact on other risks
The purpose of the classification of risks is to show the risks identified in a structured manner,
for example, in relation to their origin, as set out in the following graph
SECTOR:
 A risk that external factors independent from the entrepreneur’s management could directly
or indirectly influence the achievement of his or her objectives and strategies to a significant
extent.
Examples:
          Strong exposure to regulatory changes
          Business fragmentation
          Appearance of new markets
OPERATIONAL:
The operational risks are associated with the entrepreneur’s ability to convert the strategy
chosen into specific plans, by means of an effective allocation of resources. Examples: Need
for making an advertising effort High staffing costs Lack of operational and financial planning
Tendency toward subcontracting. Tendency towards concentration
TECHNOLOGY:
This measures the entrepreneur’s exposure to the technological risks derived from the need
to undertake heavy investment in order to ensure the feasibility of his or her business project
within a specific period of time or the need for training the company’s employees in the use of
the technology.
Examples:
          Significant investments
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                      27
Learner Manual
          Low level of implementation
          Low level of technological training
COMPETITORS:
The size, the financial and operational capacity of the agents in a sector determine the
degree of rivalry in that sector and set the rules of the game that any new agent has to
consider in order to operate in the marketplace; this can involve risks for the entrepreneur.
Examples:
          Appearance of new competitors
          Intense competition
          Specialized competition
SUPPLIERS:
The role played by the suppliers in the sector could generate risks for an entrepreneur due to
variations in the price of raw materials, to the availability of a variety in the supply and for a
continuous period of time, as well as the degree of concentration of the suppliers, which will
determine the method of payment traditionally accepted in the sector.
Examples:
          Exposure to changes in the price of goods
          Dispersion in the supply
          Non-determination of the quality of the service provided Increase in power of
           negotiation
CUSTOMERS:
The customer can be a crucial focal point of risk for an entrepreneur, since they are the
generators of revenues; the risk can stem from changes in their tastes and needs, from
generating pressures forcing prices down or from lengthening the payment period, among
other factors, in such a way that the entrepreneur’s value proposal must always be customer-
oriented.
Examples:
          Increase in power of negotiation
          Lack of loyalty
          Social and demographic changes
          Seasonality and decline in the demand
Examples:
          Long-term financial incapacity
          Exposure to interest rate changes
          Lack of knowledge of advantageous sources of financing, subsidies, etc.
Risk Description
     Being able to describe and understand risks is of fundamental importance to:
          Assigning risk ownership
          Making risk estimates •Developing effective risk responses
          Structuring risk information e.g. breaking down composite risks or identifying parent-
           child relationships
          Reporting and explaining the implications of risks
Technique
There are a number of risk description techniques. The approach recommended on this sheet
has been proven in practice and supports both qualitative and quantitative risk analysis
techniques. The given example is simple. However, the approach is sufficiently flexible to
describe more complex situations.
Recommended approach
Risks can be described in three parts: context, sources of uncertainty and impact
Context: summarise the relevant background facts. These may include prior decisions,
assumptions, dependencies and relevant objectives. Example: “It is assumed that the
subcontractor will have received all drawings by 1st March.”
Source(s) of uncertainty:
summarise or list the factor(s) that may cause the risk to occur and/or influence the extent of
its effect. Example: “Drawings could be delayed by late changes to the specification or a lack
of design resources.” Note – lack of certainty is a common property of all risks.
Risk Responses
Using a sound risk description approach aids the identification of risk responses. The figure
below shows how different risk response strategies target different aspects of the way in
which risk is understood
It’s also important to scan the environment from time to time to identify new and emerging
risks, as the department’s exposure to risk may be constantly changing.
There is no easy scientific method that will guarantee you will identify all risks. Some
additional better practice approaches to and sources for identifying risks include:
Identifying risks involves considering what, when, why, where and how things can happen.
More specifically:
          What are the sources of risk or threat – the things which have the inherent potential to
           harm or facilitate harm.
          What could happen – events or incidents that could occur whereby the source of risk
           or threat has an impact on the achievement of objectives.
          Where – the physical locations/assets where the event could occur or where the direct
           or indirect consequences may be experienced.
          When – specific times or time periods when the event is likely to occur and/or the
           consequences realised.
          How – the manner or method in which the risk event or incident could occur.
          Causes – what are the direct and indirect factors that create the source of risk or
           threat.
          Business consequences – what would be the impact on objectives if the risk was
           realised.
          Business areas/stakeholders affected – what parts of the organisation and what
           stakeholders might be involved or impacted?
          Existing controls – a preliminary review of existing controls should be undertaken to
           identify
          What controls currently exist to minimise the likelihood and consequences of each
           risk?
          What vulnerabilities exist that could undermine the effectiveness of the controls?
Other considerations
Risk statements
It is important to express the identified risks as specifically as possible in relation to the
objective. Otherwise the ability to assess and manage the risk will be less than effective.
In stating risks, avoid:
                 •    stating impacts which may arise as being the risks themselves • including risks
                      which do not impact on objectives
                 •    including risks which are simply the converse of the objectives.
To avoid poor expressions of the risk, the risk statement should encompass the uncertain
event (or uncertainty), the cause or event that trigger the risk and its consequence/impact.
Risk ownership
Once risks are identified, they should be assigned a risk owner who has responsibility for
ensuring that the risk is being managed and monitored.
Risk categories
Risks during this initial phase of the process should also be allocated a risk category.
First, look at what you’re already doing, think about what controls you have in place and how
it is organised. Then compare this with the good practice and see if there’s more you should
be doing to bring yourself up to standard. In asking yourself this, consider:
          Can I get rid of the hazard altogether?
          If not, how can I control the risks so that harm is unlikely?
When controlling risks, apply the principles below, if possible in the following order:
          try a less risky option (e.g. switch to using a less hazardous chemical)
          prevent access to the hazard (e.g. by guarding)
          organise work to reduce exposure to the hazard (e.g. put barriers between
           pedestrians and traffic)
          issue personal protective equipment (e.g. clothing, footwear, goggles etc.); and
           provide welfare facilities (e.g. first aid and washing facilities for removal of
           contamination).
Improving health and safety need not cost a lot. For instance, placing a mirror on a
dangerous blind corner to help prevent vehicle accidents is a low-cost precaution considering
the risks. Failure to take simple precautions can cost you a lot more if an accident does
happen.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                           35
    Learner Manual
    Things are likely to change between first conducting your risk assessment and your
    fundraising event. It makes sense therefore; to review what you are doing on an ongoing
    basis.
    Look at your risk assessment and think about whether there have been any changes? Are
    there improvements you still need to make? Have other people spotted a problem? Have you
    learnt anything from accidents or near misses? Make sure your risk assessment stays up to
    date.
Implementation steps
    In addition to ensuring everyone is competent to carry out their work safely, and that there is
    adequate supervision to make sure arrangements are followed, workplace precautions will be
    easier to implement if:
      risk control systems and management arrangements have been well designed
      those systems and arrangements recognise existing business practice and human
       capabilities and limitations
      Decide on the preventive and protective measures needed and put them in place
      Provide the right tools and equipment to do the job and keep them maintained
      Train and instruct, to ensure everyone is competent to carry out their work
      Supervise to make sure that arrangements are followed
    Documentation
    Documentation on health and safety should be functional and concise, with the emphasis on
    its effectiveness rather than sheer volume of paperwork.
    Focusing too much on the formal documentation of a health and safety management system
    will distract you from addressing the human elements of its implementation - the focus
    becomes the process of the system itself rather than actually controlling risks.
    In some cases, the law requires suitable records to be maintained, e.g. a record of risk
    assessments under the and the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations
    2002 .
    The control of more hazardous activities may need more detailed risk control systems. The
    control of high-hazard activities may demand detailed workplace precautions and a risk
    control system that needs to be strictly followed, such as a permit-to-work system.
    The type, frequency and depth of maintenance activities should reflect the extent and nature
    of the hazards and risks revealed by risk assessment. The balance of resources devoted to
    the various risk control systems will also reflect your risk profile.
         •     Decide on the preventive and protective measures needed and put them in place
         •     Provide the right tools and equipment to do the job and keep them maintained
         •     Train and instruct, to ensure everyone is competent to carry out their work
         •     Supervise to make sure that arrangements are followed
A risk management program is never finished. New risks will emerge and existing risks will
disappear. You have to stay on top of it.
This is vital because risk is not static. New risks will emerge and existing risks will disappear.
Risks that you have already acknowledged may become more or less frequent, severe or
relevant to your organisation. Your risk management strategy should be a fluid document that
is regularly updated to take account of changes in your organisation.
Changes to your risk profile will result from changes in your organisation (your focus may shift
from outdoor to indoor activities, for example, or your membership might become older), and
from changes in the outside world that you have no control over (changes in the law, new
technology and changes in society
What is Monitoring?
Monitoring is the continuous assessment of the risk management actions. It takes place at
all levels of management and uses both formal reporting and informal communications.
Monitoring of risk management actions involves collecting information that will help you
answer questions about the effectiveness of your project. It is important that this information
is collected and reported in a planned, organized and routine way.
This process may apply both to particular risk management projects or programs and to
government-wide sector strategies or multi-sector strategies. It includes both day-to-day and
less frequent progress reviews.
There are a number of useful ways to ensure effective monitoring and reviewing of your risk
management strategy
Set timelines
You need to set timelines and deadlines for ensuring risks are managed and treated. Make
sure the most urgent risks are dealt with first.
Write down when things need to be checked and tick them off your risk register when they've
been completed.
You will also need to make a note of when that area should be reviewed again.
The regularity of your review will depend on the activity in question. For example, smoke
detectors may only need to be checked once a year but the surface of a basketball court may
need to be inspected before and after each game.
Keep records
It's important that you investigate and record any accidents or near-misses. This will provide
you with a document trail in case you need to justify your actions, but it will also help you to
avoid similar incidents happening again.
Investigate the incident - what went wrong? Why? What could have prevented it? Document
the details of the incident and the answers to those questions for future reference. And act on
the information.
        Minutes of meetings - noting important decisions and the reasons for them
        File notes - a record of important conversations in person or on the phone
        Training records - documenting any training undertaken by staff or volunteers
        Incident records - notes taken or forms completed in the event of any injury or
         incident.
Your records should also include regular reviews of the effectiveness of the risk management
strategy itself. Ask questions such as:
The process of monitoring and reviewing your risk management strategy may result in
documented administrative procedures such as policies, guidelines, codes of practice and
rules.
Your risk management guide should include sections that invite feedback from your members
on whether the risk management strategy is working.
Often it will be people "on the ground" who are best able to see what works and what doesn't,
and who will be the first to notice any changes in the nature of risks faced by your
organisation - new risks arising, existing risks disappearing or changing.
"Good policies and procedures, always followed" should be the risk management mantra for
any not-for-profit organisation.
You should also have a process in place for dealing with complaints, suggestions and other
feedback from your staff, volunteers, members and the general public.
It's is important that the monitoring and reviewing of your risk management strategy is open
and inclusive so that everyone connected with your organisation feels a part of the continual
process of risk management, in its development, implementation and evaluation. This goes
hand in hand with effective communication, which you should be working on through every
step of the risk management process.
KT0102 EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE AND INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HAZARDS AND RISKS
Workplace hazards can come from a wide range of sources. General examples include any
substance, material, process, practice, etc. that has the ability to cause harm or adverse
health effect to a person or property. See Table 1.
 Table 1
 Examples of Hazards and Their Effects
 Workplace Hazard                    Example of Hazard Example         Example of Harm Caused
                                     of Hazard
 Thing                               Knife                             Cut
 Substance                           Benzene                           Leukemia
 Material                            Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tuberculosis
                                     Mycobacterium tuberculosis
 Source of energy                    Electricity                       Shock, electrocution
 Condition                           Wet floor                         Shock, electrocution Shock,
                                                                       electrocution
 Process                             welding                           Metal fume fever
 Practice                            Hard rock mining                  Silicosis
 Behaviour                           Bulling                           Anxiety, fear, depression
Workplace hazards also include practices or conditions that release uncontrolled energy like:
B. DEFINITION OF A RISK
Risk is the chance or probability that a person will be harmed or experience an adverse
health effect if exposed to a hazard. It may also apply to situations with property or equipment
loss, or harmful effects on the environment
Risk – the combination of the likelihood of the occurrence of a harm and the severity of that
harm.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                            42
Learner Manual
Likelihood – the chance of something happening.
Note: In risk assessment terminology, the word “likelihood” is used to refer to the chance of
something happening, whether defined, measured, or determined objectively or subjectively,
qualitatively or quantitatively, and described using general terms or mathematically (e.g., a
probability or a frequency over a given time period).
For example: the risk of developing cancer from smoking cigarettes could be expressed as:
     •     "cigarette smokers are 12 times (for example) more likely to die of lung cancer than
           non-smokers", or
     •     "the number per 100,000 smokers who will develop lung cancer" (actual number
           depends on factors such as their age and how many years they have been smoking).
           These risks are expressed as a probability or likelihood of developing a disease or
           getting injured, whereas hazard refers to the agent responsible (i.e. smoking).
     •     the nature of the exposure: how much a person is exposed to a hazardous thing or
           condition (e.g., several times a day or once a year),
     •     how the person is exposed (e.g., breathing in a vapour, skin contact), and
     •     the severity of the effect. For example, one substance may cause skin cancer, while
           another may cause skin irritation. Cancer is a much more serious effect than irritation.
Safe Exposure
            •    Control of exposure should ensure that exposure is kept below a “safe” level
            •    “Safe” exposure levels such as the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI - see slide 10) are
                 determined by establishing the dose-response curve, determining a threshold
                 dose below which no harm occurs in an exposed population and extrapolating
                 from this to a “safe” exposure by dividing by an uncertainty factor (UF), normally
                 100 or more.
            •    The threshold dose may be approximated by a NOAEL (No Observed Adverse
                 Effect Level) or a LOAEL (Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level)
Dose-Response Curve
     •     A dose response curve records the percentage of a population showing a given
           quantal (all or nothing) response such as death when each individual member of the
           population is subjected to the same dose of toxicant (reflecting a given exposure)
     •     •The LD 50 is the median dose associated with the death of 50% of the population
Dose-Effect Curves
           •     The relationship between dose and effect illustrates what happens in an individual
                 as dose increases
           •     The curves are similar to dose-response curves •Note the curve for an essential
                 nutrient –For such substances there is an optimum range of dose required for
                 good health
           •     Note the curve for no threshold toxicants –Carcinogens are believed to have no
                 safe threshold of exposure
A hazard control program consists of all steps necessary to protect workers from exposure to
a substance or system, the training and the procedures required to monitor worker exposure
and their health to hazards such as chemicals, materials or substance, or other types of
hazards such as noise and vibration. A written workplace hazard control program should
outline which methods are being used to control the exposure and how these controls will be
monitored for effectiveness.
Selecting an appropriate control is not always easy. It often involves doing a risk assessment
to evaluate and prioritize the hazards and risks. In addition, both "normal" and any potential
or unusual situations must be studied. Each program should be specially designed to suit the
needs of the individual workplace. Hence, no two programs will be exactly alike.
For example, in the case of a noise hazard, temporary measures might require workers to
use hearing protection. Long term, permanent controls might use engineering methods to
remove or isolate the noise source.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          48
Learner Manual
Why should a workplace implement hazard controls?
Some hazards and their controls will be specifically outlined in legislation. In all cases, the
employer has a duty of due diligence and is responsible for 'taking all reasonable
precautions, under the particular circumstances, to prevent injuries or accidents in the
workplace'.
In situations where there is not a clear way to control a hazard, or if legislation does not
impose a limit or guideline, you should seek guidance from occupational health professionals
such as an occupational hygienist or safety professional about what is the "best practice" or
"standard practice" when working in that situation.
These methods are also known as the "hierarchy of control". Some sources may use a
variation of this hierarchy. For example, the CSA Standard 1002-12: Occupational health and
safety – Hazard identification and elimination and risk assessment and control includes a
level called "systems that increase awareness of potential hazards". This systems level is
placed in between engineering controls and administrative controls.
However, regardless of the number of levels included, the hierarchy should be considered in
the order presented (it is always best to try to eliminate the hazard first, etc).
Control at the source and control along the path are sometimes also known as engineering
controls (see below for more details)
KT0104 EXPLAIN THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
What are the legal requirements for businesses with regard to Hazard Management?
The Health & Safety in Employment Act 1992 requires employers to identify and assess all
workplace hazards, apply appropriate controls, and communicate all hazards to employees,
contractors and members of the public. Hazards and controls must be periodically reviewed
to ensure their ongoing effectiveness, and employees must be informed and trained in
procedures to minimise harm and how to use emergency equipment. In addition, employers
must give employees an opportunity to be involved in development of hazard management
and emergency response procedures
Hazards can be broadly grouped based on their nature. This is shown below
 Hazard                                          Example
 Physical hazards                                Wet floors
                                                 Loose electrical cables Objects protruding in
                                                 walkways or doorways
 Ergonomic hazards                               Lifting heavy objects Stretching the body
                                                 Twisting the body
                                                 Poor desk seating
 Psychological hazards                           Heights
                                                 Loud sounds
                                                 Tunnels
                                                 Bright lights
 Environmental hazards                           Room                             temperature
                                                 Ventilation         Contaminated            air
                                                 Photocopiers
                                                 Some office plants Acids
 Hazardous substances                            Alkalis Solvents
 Biological hazards                              Hepatitis                                    B
What Are the Effects of a Slip and Fall Accident? What Are the Effects of a Slip and Fall
Accident?
A slip and fall accident may seem like a very simple thing. After all, most of us do not suffer
from any lasting effects because of a minor thing like this. However, there is some danger to
this type of accident. If you landed the wrong way, you could easily end up suffering from
more than just a sore bottom.
The most common cause of slip and fall accidents is wet, slippery floor. This could happen
anywhere, at a restaurant, mall, hospital, sidewalks, stairs, etc. When the floor is wet and
depending upon the type of shoes you’re wearing, your foot could easily slide out from under
you, causing you to fall and land on your bottom.
While many people only suffer from a bruised ego, there are also those who experience
severe pain. They’re not able to sit for prolonged periods of time or walk straight for days
because of the pain and discomfort, and they also have to miss days at work, causing them
to lose income.
These are not the only effects of slip and fall accidents though. Say for example that you
landed on your seat and you’re suffering from weak bones, then it could easily cause a
fracture of your tail bone. This can result to extreme pain in the coccygeal region of the spine,
causing difficulty in sitting and walking. This could also result to lower back pain.
If, for example, you landed on your buttocks and outstretched hand, then it could also cause
a stress fracture in the upper extremities. Again, this will result to pain in the affected areas. If
the fracture is severe, it could impingement of the nerves as well as blood vessels,
complicating the injuries further.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                           52
Learner Manual
Injuries to the head and neck are also not uncommon. When you fall, your head could easily
hit the hard floor if you landed the wrong way, or your neck could hit a hard surface. Injuries
such as these can lead to concussion, brain injury as well as spinal cord injury. These are not
minor injuries since it’s affected the brain and spinal cord.
Simple slip and fall accidents can also result to injuries of the back musculature such as the
back muscles, ligaments, and tendons. It could cause muscle strain and ligament sprain, and
it could also cause fracture of the vertebras. If these happen, there is the risk for spinal cord
injury, slipped disk, nerve impingement, etc.
1. Organ damage
Forget about backaches, what you should really be worried about is the impact of sitting on
your internal organs. When you sit for a long period of time your muscles burn less fat and
your blood begins to flow slowly, allowing fatty acids to easily clog your heart. Sitting has
been linked to high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, and cardiovascular disease. In
addition, your pancreas may over produce insulin, which can lead to diabetes, and studies
have linked sitting to a greater risk for developing colon, breast, and endometrial cancers.
Muscle degeneration
You know those rock-hard abs you’ve been working towards? Keep in mind that sitting does
nothing to help that six-pack peek through. When you’re standing your abdominal muscles
are tensed and tightened, but when you sit, those muscles go unused, ultimately leading to a
weak mid-section. Sitting can also impact the mobility of your hips and the strength of your
glutes. Sitting in a chair all day will make your hips tight with a more limited degree of motion
because they are rarely extended. Your glutes can weaken with lack of use affecting your
stability and power when walking and jumping.
3. Weight gain
This one is fairly obvious. No one who sits for nine or more hours a day is disillusioned
enough to believe that sitting down is great for the waistline. Obese people typically sit for two
and a half more hours per day than thin people. Between 1980 and 2000 while exercise rates
remained the same, obesity doubled as time spent sitting increased by 8%
When you sit at your desk you may be solving all sorts of problems, organizing tasks, and
using plenty of critical thinking skills, but even in the most stimulating of jobs your brain can
become foggy from sitting for long periods of time. Moving muscles pump fresh blood and
oxygen to the brain, which triggers the release of brain and mood enhancing chemicals. Your
brain function will actually slow when you’re sedentary for long periods of time.
One of the most common and very physical symptoms of living much of your life in a seated
position is the presence of back and neck pain. Cradling a phone to your ear and jutting your
neck and head forward while working at a computer leads to strains in your cervical vertebrae
which causes neck strain, sore shoulders, and back pain. The very act of sitting puts added
pressure on your spine and compresses the disks that make up your back.
IAC0101
Given various scenarios of work situations with different hazards and potential risks. Be
able to: Without reference to the learning material: a. Identify the various hazards; b.
Classify the hazards in terms of the potential for causing injury or damage; c. Describe the
associated risks and d. Indicate the relevant controls that can be put in place.
   On completion of this section you will be able to understand Techniques of accident and
   incident investigation
The word accident has a negative implication and could result in loss of life, or damage to
goods. It means mishap, an unforeseen event or an unplanned circumstance that occur, with
a most common negative outcome. The word has also been started to use in positive
manner, where something that happens unexpectedly can also lead to go things.
Accident and incident are two different words that are often confused and used
interchangeably, however, these words are different from each other and have different
implications.
Key Difference: The word accident has a negative implication and could result in loss of life,
or damage to goods. An incident on the other hand can refer to any even that happens; it
could be positive or negative.
Examples:
    •     There was huge accident, which cost many lives on the bridge.
    •     Mike was injured in an accident at work.
    •     I accidently lost my keys.
    •     Running into Molly was a happy accident. (Positive implication)
An incident on the other hand can refer to any even that happens; it could be positive or
negative. In many times, incident is often interchanged with accident, if it has a most positive
implication. It is used to describe any incidents in general. Incidents usually have adjectives
before the word, in order to explain the type of incident it is.
Examples:
    •     There was huge accident, which cost many lives on the bridge.
    •     Mike was injured in an accident at work.
    •     I accidently lost my keys.
    •     Running into Molly was a happy accident. (Positive implication)
An incident on the other hand can refer to any even that happens; it could be positive or
negative. In many times, incident is often interchanged with accident, if it has a most positive
implication. It is used to describe any incidents in general. Incidents usually have adjectives
before the word, in order to explain the type of incident it is.
Examples:
KT0202 USE EXAMPLES TO EXPLAIN THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF ACCIDENTS AND INCIDENTS GIVING THE TYPICAL
A major concern of safety at work is preventing accidents at work. An accident at work can be
defined in different ways depending of the context in which it is used. Often also the word
incident is used, sometimes as a broader term encompassing ‘an accident' as a specific type
of incident, but sometimes the words accidents and incidents refer to two different types of
events.
           6. The fact that occupational accidents are fortuitous, sudden, unexpected external
                 events allows making a distinction between accidents and diseases. Diseases are
                 usually caused by a process extended over a longer period of time and not by a
                 sudden event. Although this distinction seems straightforward it is not always the
                 case. For instance, back problems can be the result from continuous exposure or
                 be linked to a sudden event.
           7. Occupational accidents occur during working hours and/or on the way to and from
                 the workplace. In a broad sense occupational accident also include commuting
                 accidents. However, some Workers' Compensation Systems exclude this type of
                 accidents.
           8. The definition of an occupational accident also includes the fact that the accident
                 has to arise out of work performed in the course and the scope of employment.
                 This criterion often leads to discussions about accidents during activities in the
                 workplace where the link with the scope of employment is somewhat questionable
                 e.g. during excursions, doing private work or business at the workplace, etc. The
An accident at work is defined as a discrete occurrence in the course of work which leads to
physical or mental harm. This includes cases of acute poisoning and willful acts of other
persons, as well as accidents occurring during work but off the company’s premises, even
those caused by third parties. It excludes deliberate self-inflicted injuries, accidents on the
way to and from work (commuting accidents), accidents having only a medical origin and
occupational diseases.
The phrase in the course of work means whilst engaged in an occupational activity or during
the time spent at work. This includes cases of road traffic accidents in the course of work.
A fatal accident is defined in ESAW as an accident leading to the death of a victim within one
year of the accident. A commuting accident is defined as an accident that occurs during the
normal journey between the home, the place of work and the usual place where meals are
taken. Only accidents at work with an absence of more than three calendar days are included
in the ESAW data. This means that an accident at work is included in the ESAW database if
the person is unfit for work for more than three days, including Saturdays, Sundays or other
days where the person is not usually working.
Other models have been developed since, for instance the Swiss cheese model of James
Reason (figure 2)]. The Swiss cheese model shows several layers or barriers between
management decision-making and accidents and incidents. Each of the barriers has holes
and accidents or incidents occur when the holes in these layers align. Reason makes a
distinction between active and latent failures. Latent failures find their origin in fallible
decisions by high-level decision makers (and designers). Active failures are a mere symptom
of latent failures.
There are short overview of models and their impact on accident investigation methods The
choice of model and method has consequences for the factors and causes that are
associated with accidents and incidents at work
Data on accidents at work are available through national reporting systems (e.g. accident
insurers) or through surveys. The European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) asks
respondents how many days off work due to health problems could be attributed to an
accident. Therefore, only accidents with absence from work are reported in this survey. The
Labour Force Survey (LFS) ad hoc module 1999 and 2007 provides data on self-reported
occupational accidents in the year preceding to the administration of the survey, irrespective
of whether these accidents resulted in absence from work.
ESAW, the European Statistics on Accidents at Work, only include data on accidents at work
with more than three days of absence from work and fatal accidents. The ESAW data are
provided by national reporting systems. A report from Eurostat brings the data on accidents at
work from these three sources together[7]. The data below are based on this report.
According to the LFS ad hoc module 2007 3.2% of the persons in the EU-27 of 15-64 years
that worked or had worked during the past year had one or more accidents at work in the past
12 months. This percentage corresponds to 6.9 million persons in the EU-27. Road traffic
accidents during work or in the course of work (excluding commuting accidents) were
reported in the LFS ad hoc module 2007 by 0.3% of the persons, corresponding to 0.67
million persons in the EU-27. Road traffic accidents constituted 9.6% of all accidents at work.
According to ESAW, 5580 workers in the EU-27 died in a fatal accident at work in 2007 and
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       63
Learner Manual
approximately 2.9 % of the workers had an accident at work with more than 3 days of
absence.
Trends seem to indicate that accidents at work are decreasing. This trend can be linked to
changes in the world of work. More women are working and accident rates are lower among
women than men. Also the fact that Europe is facing an ageing workforce explains (partially)
this decreasing trend since fewer accidents occur among older workers compared to young
ones.
Men are more often victim of an accident at work than women. The LFS data from 2007 show
4.0% of the male workers had an accident in comparison with 2.1% of the female workers.
Young workers have more accidents than older ones. Figure 3 shows the occurrence of
accidents at work in different age groups[
 Occurrence of one or more accidental injuries at work or in the course of work in the past 12
months in the EU-27 in different age groups (%)
Figure 4 shows that accidents at work most occur in the sectors ‘agriculture, hunting and
forestry’, ‘manufacturing’, and ‘construction’, particularly among men. Women in the sectors
‘health and social work’ and ‘hotels and restaurants’ had more often one or more accidents
than women working in other sectors.
Comparable data can be found in the ESAW 2007 data (EU-15 without Greece). Accidents at
work with more than three days of absence occurred most often in the sectors ‘mining and
quarrying’ (10.0%), ‘construction’ (51%), ‘fishing’ (4.1%) and ‘agriculture’ (3.9%). The lowest
occurrence was found in ‘financial intermediation’ (<1%), ‘real estate, renting and business
activities’ and ‘electricity, gas and water supply’ (both 1.7%).
Figure 4: Workers in the EU-27 reporting one or more accidental injuries at work or in the
course of work in the past 12 months in their main job in different sectors (%
Information on the type of accident at work and the chain of events that resulted in an
accident can be found in the ESAW data. Figure 5 shows the events leading to fatal and non-
fatal accidents. About 70% of nonfatal accidents at work result from loss of control, fall or
The most obvious consequence of accidents is the fact that they result in absence from work.
Statistics show that in the EU-27 of all persons aged 15-64 years that work or worked during
the past 12 months 2.3% was on sick leave for at least one day due to an accident at work.
This corresponds to approximately 5.0 million persons in the EU-27. Prolonged sick leave (for
one month or more) was reported by 22.0%, which corresponds to 0.7% of the persons that
work or worked during the past 12 months, and to 1.5 million persons in the EU-27. Older
workers with accidents more often experience prolonged absence from work than younger
workers.
The most common types of injury that result from accidents are wounds and superficial
injuries, and dislocations, sprains and strains (figure 6)[7]. Injuries are most often located on
the upper extremities, followed by the lower extremities.
Figure 6: Occurrence of accidents at work with more than 3 days of absence by type of injury
(%)
Data on accidents at work are available through national reporting systems (e.g. accident
insurers) or through surveys. The European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) asks
respondents how many days off work due to health problems could be attributed to an
accident. Therefore, only accidents with absence from work are reported in this survey. The
Labour Force Survey (LFS) ad hoc module 1999 and 2007 provides data on self-reported
occupational accidents in the year preceding to the administration of the survey, irrespective
of whether these accidents resulted in absence from work.
ESAW, the European Statistics on Accidents at Work, only include data on accidents at work
with more than three days of absence from work and fatal accidents. The ESAW data are
According to the LFS ad hoc module 2007 3.2% of the persons in the EU-27 of 15-64 years
that worked or had worked during the past year had one or more accidents at work in the past
12 months. This percentage corresponds to 6.9 million persons in the EU-27. Road traffic
accidents during work or in the course of work (excluding commuting accidents) were
reported in the LFS ad hoc module 2007 by 0.3% of the persons, corresponding to 0.67
million persons in the EU-27. Road traffic accidents constituted 9.6% of all accidents at work.
According to ESAW, 5580 workers in the EU-27 died in a fatal accident at work in 2007 and
approximately 2.9 % of the workers had an accident at work with more than 3 days of
absence.
Trends seem to indicate that accidents at work are decreasing. This trend can be linked to
changes in the world of work. More women are working and accident rates are lower among
women than men. Also the fact that Europe is facing an ageing workforce explains (partially)
this decreasing trend since fewer accidents occur among older workers compared to young
ones.
Men are more often victim of an accident at work than women. The LFS data from 2007 show
4.0% of the male workers had an accident in comparison with 2.1% of the female workers.
Young workers have more accidents than older ones. Figure 3 shows the occurrence of
accidents at work in different age groups[
 Occurrence of one or more accidental injuries at work or in the course of work in the past 12
months in the EU-27 in different age groups (%)
Figure 4 shows that accidents at work most occur in the sectors ‘agriculture, hunting and
forestry’, ‘manufacturing’, and ‘construction’, particularly among men. Women in the sectors
‘health and social work’ and ‘hotels and restaurants’ had more often one or more accidents
than women working in other sectors.
Comparable data can be found in the ESAW 2007 data (EU-15 without Greece). Accidents at
work with more than three days of absence occurred most often in the sectors ‘mining and
quarrying’ (10.0%), ‘construction’ (51%), ‘fishing’ (4.1%) and ‘agriculture’ (3.9%). The lowest
Figure 4: Workers in the EU-27 reporting one or more accidental injuries at work or in the
course of work in the past 12 months in their main job in different sectors (%
Information on the type of accident at work and the chain of events that resulted in an
accident can be found in the ESAW data. Figure 5 shows the events leading to fatal and non-
fatal accidents. About 70% of nonfatal accidents at work result from loss of control, fall or
physical stress. More than 40% of the fatal accidents result from loss of control. Many of
these fatal injuries arise by contact with or collision with an object. In non-fatal accidents,
injury was most often caused by horizontal/vertical impact with or against a stationary object
(victim in motion), physical or mental stress, contact with sharp, pointed, rough or coarse
material agent and struck by or collision with an object in motion.
The most obvious consequence of accidents is the fact that they result in absence from work.
Statistics show that in the EU-27 of all persons aged 15-64 years that work or worked during
the past 12 months 2.3% was on sick leave for at least one day due to an accident at work.
This corresponds to approximately 5.0 million persons in the EU-27. Prolonged sick leave (for
one month or more) was reported by 22.0%, which corresponds to 0.7% of the persons that
work or worked during the past 12 months, and to 1.5 million persons in the EU-27. Older
workers with accidents more often experience prolonged absence from work than younger
workers.
The most common types of injury that result from accidents are wounds and superficial
injuries, and dislocations, sprains and strains (figure 6)[7]. Injuries are most often located on
the upper extremities, followed by the lower extremities.
Figure 6: Occurrence of accidents at work with more than 3 days of absence by type of injury
(%)
Data on accidents at work are available through national reporting systems (e.g. accident
insurers) or through surveys. The European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) asks
respondents how many days off work due to health problems could be attributed to an
accident. Therefore, only accidents with absence from work are reported in this survey. The
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       67
Learner Manual
Labour Force Survey (LFS) ad hoc module 1999 and 2007 provides data on self-reported
occupational accidents in the year preceding to the administration of the survey, irrespective
of whether these accidents resulted in absence from work.
ESAW, the European Statistics on Accidents at Work, only include data on accidents at work
with more than three days of absence from work and fatal accidents. The ESAW data are
provided by national reporting systems. A report from Eurostat brings the data on accidents at
work from these three sources together[7]. The data below are based on this report.
According to the LFS ad hoc module 2007 3.2% of the persons in the EU-27 of 15-64 years
that worked or had worked during the past year had one or more accidents at work in the past
12 months. This percentage corresponds to 6.9 million persons in the EU-27. Road traffic
accidents during work or in the course of work (excluding commuting accidents) were
reported in the LFS ad hoc module 2007 by 0.3% of the persons, corresponding to 0.67
million persons in the EU-27. Road traffic accidents constituted 9.6% of all accidents at work.
According to ESAW, 5580 workers in the EU-27 died in a fatal accident at work in 2007 and
approximately 2.9 % of the workers had an accident at work with more than 3 days of
absence.
Trends seem to indicate that accidents at work are decreasing. This trend can be linked to
changes in the world of work. More women are working and accident rates are lower among
women than men. Also the fact that Europe is facing an ageing workforce explains (partially)
this decreasing trend since fewer accidents occur among older workers compared to young
ones.
Young workers have more accidents than older ones. Figure 3 shows the occurrence of
accidents at work in different age groups[
Figure 4 shows that accidents at work most occur in the sectors ‘agriculture, hunting and
forestry’, ‘manufacturing’, and ‘construction’, particularly among men. Women in the sectors
‘health and social work’ and ‘hotels and restaurants’ had more often one or more accidents
than women working in other sectors.
Comparable data can be found in the ESAW 2007 data (EU-15 without Greece). Accidents at
work with more than three days of absence occurred most often in the sectors ‘mining and
quarrying’ (10.0%), ‘construction’ (51%), ‘fishing’ (4.1%) and ‘agriculture’ (3.9%). The lowest
occurrence was found in ‘financial intermediation’ (<1%), ‘real estate, renting and business
activities’ and ‘electricity, gas and water supply’ (both 1.7%).
Figure 4: Workers in the EU-27 reporting one or more accidental injuries at work or in the
course of work in the past 12 months in their main job in different sectors (%
The most common types of injury that result from accidents are wounds and superficial
injuries, and dislocations, sprains and strains (figure 6)[7]. Injuries are most often located on
the upper extremities, followed by the lower extremities.
Figure 6: Occurrence of accidents at work with more than 3 days of absence by type of injury
(%)
KT0203 DESCRIBE THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING THE NEED TO INVESTIGATE AND REPORT ON ALL ACCIDENTS AND
INCIDENTS
All near misses, incidents and accidents should be reported no matter how slight they may
appear. Accidents happen for a reason, it could be machine failure, unsafe work practices or
poor housekeeping, but reporting these occurrences can help identify the cause and help
prevent this accident reoccurring.
All reports should be submitted to management as soon as possible so the incident can be
investigated. Reasons for workplace accident investigation are
     •     most importantly to find out the cause of accidents and to prevent similar accidents in
           the future
     •     to fulfill the legal requirement
     •     to determine the cost of an accident
     •     to determine compliance with applicable safety regulations
     •     to process workers' compensation claims Incidents that involve no injury or property
           damage should still be investigated to determine the hazards that should be
           corrected.
The advantage is that this person is likely to know most about the work and persons involved
and the current conditions. Furthermore, the supervisor can usually take immediate remedial
action. The counter argument is that there may be an attempt to gloss over the supervisors’
shortcomings in the accident. This situation should not arise if the accident is investigated by
a team of people, and if the worker representative(s) and the management members review
all accident investigation reports thoroughly.
Why look for the "root cause"? An investigator who believes that accidents are caused by
unsafe conditions will likely try to uncover conditions as causes. On the other hand, one who
believes they are caused by unsafe acts will attempt to find the human errors that are causes.
Therefore, it is necessary to examine some underlying factors in a chain of events that ends
in an accident. The important point is that even in the most seemingly straightforward
accidents, seldom, if ever, is there only a single cause. For example, an "investigation" which
concludes that an accident was due to worker carelessness, and goes no further, fails to seek
answers to several important questions such as:
          Was the worker distracted? If yes, why was the worker distracted?
          Was a safe work procedure being followed? If not, why not?
          Were safety devices in order? If not, why not?
          Was the worker trained? If not, why not?
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       72
Learner Manual
An inquiry that answers these and related questions will probably reveal conditions that are
more open to correction than attempts to prevent "carelessness".
Accident Investigation
Accident reporting alone is not enough to prevent a reoccurrence, once reported an accident
must be investigated as soon as possible.
The investigation process should carefully examine all aspects and failures that occurred in
order to establish the root cause of the incident. This is vital to ensure effective and
appropriate controls are put in place to prevent reoccurrence.
All controls implemented should be monitored to ensure they remain effective and are being
followed.
                     Any accident which results in an employee to miss regular work for 3 or more
                      consecutive days must be reported to the HSA.
                     Also, any fatal accident must be immediately reported to the HSA.
                     Any accident involving a member of public.
                     A dangerous occurrence, a list of which is available on the HSA website.
                     While workplaces can never be 100% safe, effective reporting and thorough
                      investigation of all accidents/incidents can go a long way in preventing injury
                      and even death.
What Types of Accidents Must be Notified to the Health and Safety Authority?
KT0204 DESCRIBE THE TYPICAL PROCESS FOR INVESTIGATING ACCIDENTS AND INCIDENTS
1. FORMAL INVESTIGATIONS
a. Formal investigations are conducted for serious accidents. Both Safety and the
Department involved are participants in the investigation. The following incidents are the ones
normally investigated in a formal investigation:
              I.      Lost time accidents (Lost time is missing the next tour of duty/work day.)
             II.      Serious accidents or near misses without lost time such as explosions, fires,
                      chemical spills, and electrical accidents
b. The supervisor’s first duty is to assist the injured with obtaining medical attention.
Supervisors are required to accompany the person to the physician if possible to explain to
the physician the employee's job duties to allow proper determination as to the return to work
restrictions. After this, the supervisor carries out the following steps:
As little time as possible should be lost between the moment of an accident or near miss and
the beginning of the investigation. In this way, one is most likely to be able to observe the
conditions as they were at the time, prevent disturbance of evidence, and identify witnesses.
The tools that members of the investigating team may need (pencil, paper, camera, film,
camera flash, tape measure, etc.) should be immediately available so that no time is wasted.
KT0205 DESCRIBE THE CRITERIA FOR EFFECTIVE ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT INVESTIGATION
There are many tools and criteria for structuring the investigation, analysing adverse events,
and identifying root causes. There is no one criteria– it is for you to choose which criteria suit
your company. These criteria are simply tools, not an end in themselves. For large, complex
or technically demanding investigations, these techniques maybe essential in determining not
only how the adverse event happened, but also what were the root causes.
The table below will assist you in determining the level of investigation which is appropriate
for the adverse event. Remember you must consider the worst potential consequences of the
adverse event (e.g. a scaffold collapse may not have caused any injuries, but had the
potential to cause major or fatal injuries).
The definitions of ‘consequence’ and ‘likelihood’ are set out in the section on ‘Understanding
the language of investigation’)
          In a minimal level investigation, the relevant supervisor will look into the
           circumstances of the event and try to learn any lessons which will prevent future
           occurrences.
          A low-level investigation will involve a short investigation by the relevant supervisor or
           line manager into the circumstances and immediate, underlying and root causes of
           the adverse event, to try to prevent a recurrence and to learn any general lessons.
          A medium level investigation will involve a more detailed investigation by the relevant
           supervisor or line manager, the health and safety adviser and employee
           representatives and will look for the immediate, underlying and root causes.
          A high-level investigation will involve a team-based investigation, involving
           supervisors            or   line   managers,   health   and   safety   advisers   and     employee
           representatives. It will be carried out under the supervision of senior management or
           directors and will look for the immediate, underlying, and root causes
The investigation
The four steps include a series of numbered questions. These set out in detail the information
that should be entered onto the adverse event investigation form. The question numbers
correspond to those on the form.
It is important to capture information as soon as possible. This stops it being corrupted, e.g.
items moved, guards replaced etc. If necessary, work must stop and unauthorised access be
prevented. Talk to everyone who was close by when the adverse event happened, especially
those who saw what happened or know anything about the conditions that led to it.
The amount of time and effort spent on information gathering should be proportionate to the
level of investigation. Collect all available and relevant information. That includes opinions,
experiences, observations, sketches, measurements, photographs, check sheets, permits-to-
work and details of the environmental conditions at the time etc. This information can be
recorded initially in note form, with a formal report being completed later. These notes should
be kept at least until the investigation is complete
How did the adverse event happen? Note any equipment involved.
Describe the chain of events leading up to, and immediately after, the adverse event. Very
often, a number of chance occurrences and coincidences combine to create the
circumstances in which an adverse event can happen. All these factors should be recorded
here in chronological order, if possible.
Work out the chain of events by talking to the injured person, eye witnesses, line managers,
health and safety representatives and fellow workers to find out what happened and who did
what. In particular, note the position of those injured, both immediately before and after the
adverse event. Be objective and, as far as possible, avoid apportioning guilt, assigning
responsibility or making snap judgements on the probable causes.
Plant and equipment that had a direct bearing on the adverse event must be identified clearly.
This information can usually be obtained from a nameplate attached to the equipment. Note
all the details available, the manufacturer, model type, model number, machine number and
year of manufacture and any modifications made to the equipment. Note the position of the
machinery controls immediately after the adverse event.
This information may help you to spot trends and identify risk control measures. You should
consider approaching the supplier if the same machine has been implicated in a number of
adverse events. Be precise. Shop floor process and layout changes are a regular occurrence.
Unless you precisely identify plant and equipment, you will not detect, eg that a machine or
particular piece of equipment has been moved around and caused injuries on separate
occasions, in different locations.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       79
Learner Manual
The work that was being done just before the adverse event happened can often cast light on
the conditions and circumstances that caused something to go wrong. Provide a good
description, including all the relevant details, e.g. the surroundings, the equipment/materials
being used, the number of employees engaged in the various activities, the way they were
positioned and any details about the way they were behaving etc.
Was there anything unusual or different about the working conditions?
Adverse events often happen when something is different. When faced with a new situation,
employees may find it difficult to adapt, particularly if the sources of danger are unknown to
them, or if they have not been adequately prepared to deal with the new situation. If working
conditions or processes were significantly different to normal, why was this?
Describe what was new or different in the situation. Was there a safe working method in
place for this situation, were operatives aware of it, and was it being followed? If not, why
not? Learning how people deal with unfamiliar situations will enable similar situations to be
better handled in the future.
Was the way the changes, temporary or otherwise, were introduced a factor?
Were the workers and supervisors aware that things were different? Were workers and
supervisors sufficiently trained/experienced to recognise and adapt to changing
circumstances?
Were there adequate safe working procedures and were they followed?
Adverse events often happen when there are no safe working procedures or where
procedures are inadequate or are not followed. Comments such as ‘…we’ve been doing it
that way for years and nothing has ever gone wrong before…’ or ‘…he has been working on
that machine for years and knows what to do…’ often lead to the injured person getting the
blame, irrespective of what part procedures, training and supervision – or the lack of them –
had to play in the adverse event. What was it about normal practice that proved inadequate?
Was a safe working method in place and being followed? If not, why not? Was there
adequate supervision and were the supervisors themselves sufficiently trained and
experienced? Again, it is important to pose these questions without attempting to apportion
blame, assign responsibility or stipulate cause.
It is important to note which parts of the body have been injured and the nature of the injury -
i.e. bruising, crushing, a burn, a cut, a broken bone etc. Be as precise as you are able. If the
site of the injury is the right upper arm, midway between the elbow and the shoulder joint, say
so. Precise descriptions will enable you to spot trends and take prompt remedial action. For
example, it could be that what appears to be a safe piece of equipment, due to the standard
of its guarding, is actually causing a number of inadvertent cut injuries due to the sharp edges
on the guards themselves.
Facts such as whether the injured person was given first aid or taken to hospital (by
ambulance, a colleague etc) should also be recorded here 8 If there was an injury, how did it
occur and what caused it?
The object that inflicted the injury may be a hand-held tool like a knife, or a chemical, a
machine, or a vehicle etc. The way in which it happened might, e.g., be that the employee cut
themselves or spilt chemicals on their skin.
Was the risk known? If so, why wasn’t it controlled? If not, why not?
You need to find out whether the source of the danger and its potential consequences were
known, and whether this information was communicated to those who needed to know. You
should note what is said and who said it, so that potential gaps in the communication flow
may be identified and remedied.
The aim is to find out why the sources of danger may have been ignored, not fully
appreciated or not understood. Remember you are investigating the processes and systems,
not the person.
The existence of a written risk assessment for the process or task that led to the adverse
event will help to reveal what was known of the associated risks. A judgement can be made
as to whether the risk assessment was ’suitable and sufficient’, as required by law and
Did the organisation and arrangement of the work influence the adverseevent?
The organisational arrangement sets the framework within which the work is done.
Here are some examples; there are many more:
          Standards of supervision and on-site monitoring of working practices may be less than
           adequate;
          Lack of skills or knowledge may mean that nobody intervenes in the event of
           procedural errors;
          Inappropriate working procedures may mean certain steps in the procedures are
           omitted, because they are too difficult and time-consuming;
          Lack of planning may mean that some tasks are not done, are done too late or are
           done in the wrong order;
          Employees’ actions and priorities may be a consequence of the way in which they are
           paid or otherwise rewarded;
          High production targets and piecework may result in safety measures being degraded
           and employees working at too fast a pace.
Lack of maintenance and poor housekeeping are common causes of adverse events. Was
the state of repair and condition of the workplace, plant and equipment such that they
contributed to or caused the adverse event? Were the brakes on the forklift truck in good
working order? Were spills dealt with immediately? Was the site so cluttered and untidy that it
created a slipping or tripping hazard? Was there a programme of preventative maintenance?
What are the instructions concerning good housekeeping in the workplace?
You should observe the location of the adverse event as soon as possible and judge whether
the general condition or state of repair of the premises, plant or equipment was adequate.
Those working in the area, together with witnesses, and any injured parties, should also be
asked for their opinion. Working in the area, they will have a good idea of what is acceptable
and whether conditions had deteriorated over time. Consider the role the following factors
may play:
          A badly maintained machine or tool may mean an employee is exposed to excessive
           vibration or noise and has to use increased force, or tamper with the machine to get
           the work done;
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       82
Learner Manual
          A noisy environment may prevent employees hearing instructions correctly as well as
           being a possible cause of noise-induced hearing loss;
          Uneven floors may make movement around the workplace, especially vehicle
           movements, hazardous;
          Badly maintained lighting may make carrying out the task more difficult;
          Poorly stored materials on the floor in and around the work area will increasethe risk
           of tripping;
          Ice, dirt and other contaminants on stairs or walkways make it easier to slip and fall;
          Tools not in immediate use should be stored appropriately and not left lying around
           the work area.
Training should provide workers with the necessary knowledge, skills and hands-on work
experience to carry out their work efficiently and safely. The fact that someone has been
doing the same job for a long time does not necessarily mean that they have the necessary
skills or experience to do it safely. This is particularly the case when the normal routine is
changed, when any lack of understanding can become apparent. There is no substitute for
adequate health and safety training. Some of the problems that might arise follow:
          A lack of instruction and training may mean that tasks are not done properly;
          Misunderstandings, which arise more easily when employees lack understanding of
           the usual routines and procedures in the organisation;
          A lack of respect for the risks involved, due to ignorance of the potential
           consequences;
          Problems due to the immaturity, inexperience and lack of awareness of existing or
           potential risks among young people (under18).You must assess the risks to young
           people before they start work;
          Poor handling of dangerous materials or tools, due to employees not being properly
           informed about how things should be done correctly.
          People should also be matched to their work in terms of health, strength, mental
           ability and physical stature.
The physical layout and surroundings of the workplace can affect health and safety.
Injuries may be caused by sharp table edges. Hazardous or highly inflammable fumes may
be produced in areas where operatives work or where there are naked lights. Or, the
workplace may be organised in such a way that there is not enough circulation space. Or, it
may be impossible to see or hear warning signals, e.g. during fork lift truck movements.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                            83
Learner Manual
Employees should be able to see the whole of their work area and see what their immediate
colleagues are doing. The workplace should be organised in such a way that safe practices
are encouraged. In other words, workplace arrangements should discourage employees from
running risks, e.g. providing a clear walkway around machinery will discourage people from
crawling under or climbing over it.
Did the nature or shape of the materials influence the adverse event?
As well as being intrinsically hazardous, materials can pose a hazard simply by their design,
weight, quality or packaging, eg heavy and awkward materials, materials with sharp edges,
splinters, poisonous chemicals etc.
The choice of materials also influences work processes, eg a particularly hazardous material
may be required. Poor quality may also result in materials or equipment failing during normal
processing, causing malfunctions and accidents.
Did difficulties using the plant and equipment influence the adverse event?
Plant and equipment includes all the machinery, plant and tools used to organise and carry
out the work. All of these items should be designed to suit the people using them. This is
referred to as ergonomic design, where the focus is on the individual as well as the work task
the item is specifically designed to carry out. If the equipment meets the needs of the
individual user, it is more likely to be used as it is intended - ie safely. Consider user
instructions here. A machine that requires its operator to follow a complicated user manual is
a source of risk in itself.
An analysis involves examining all the facts, determining what happened and why?
All the detailed information gathered should be assembled and examined to identify what
information is relevant and what information is missing. The information gathering and
analysis are actually carried out side by side. As the analysis progresses, further lines of
enquiry requiring additional information will develop.
To be thorough and free from bias, the analysis must be carried out in a systematic way, so
all the possible causes and consequences of the adverse event are fully considered. A
number of formal methods have been developed to aid this approach.
One useful method for organising your information, identifying gaps and beginning
the analysis is Events and Causal Factor Analysis (ECFA), which is beyond the scope of this
guidance.
The analysis should be conducted with employee or trade union health and safety
representatives and other experts or specialists, as appropriate. This team approach can
often be highly productive in enabling all the relevant causal factors to emerge.
It is only by identifying all causes, and the root causes in particular, that you can learn from
past failures and prevent future repetitions.
The causes of adverse events often relate to one another in a complex way, sometimes only
influencing events and at other times having an overwhelming impact, due to their timing or
the way they interact. The analysis must consider all possible causes. Keep an open mind.
Do not reject a possible cause until you have given it serious consideration. The emphasis is
on a thorough, systematic and objective look at the evidence.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       85
Learner Manual
Analysis
There are many methods of analysing the information gathered in an investigation to find the
immediate, underlying and root causes and it is for you to choose whichever method suits
you best
The first step in understanding what happened and why is to organise the information you
have gathered. This guidance uses the simple technique of asking Why’ over and over, until
the answer is no longer meaningful. The starting point is the ‘event’, e.g. John has broken his
leg. On the line below, set out the reasons why this happened. This first line should identify:
          the vulnerable person, e.g. John on a ladder;
          the hazard, eg falling due to gravity;
          the circumstances that brought them together, e.g. John fell off the ladder.
For each of the reasons identified ask ‘Why?’ and set down the answers. Continue down the
page asking ‘Why’ until the answers are no longer meaningful. Do not be concerned at the
number of times you ask the question, ‘Why?’ because by doing so you will arrive at the real
causes of the adverse event.
Some lines of enquiry will quickly end, e.g. ‘Why was the hazard of falling present?’
Answer: ‘Gravity’. Having collected the relevant information and determined what happened
and why, you can now determine the causes of the adverse event systematically.
Not addressing the ‘human’ factors greatly reduces the value of the investigation.
The objective of an investigation is to learn the lessons and to act to prevent recurrences,
through suitable risk control measures. You will not be able to do that unless your workforce
trusts you enough to co-operate with you. Laying all the blame on one or more individuals is
counter-productive and runs the risk of alienating the workforce and undermining the safety
culture, crucial to creating and maintaining a safer working environment.
Speak to those involved and explain how you believe their action(s) contributed to the
adverse event. Invite them to explain why they did what they did. This may not only help you
better understand the reasons behind the immediate causes of the adverse event, but may
offer more pointers to the underlying causes: perhaps the production deadline was short, and
removing the guards saved valuable time; maybe the workload is too great for one person
etc.
Unless you discover a deliberate and malicious violation or sabotage of workplace safety
precautions, it may be counter-productive to take disciplinary action against those involved.
Will anyone be open and honest with you the next time an adverse event occurs? What you
should aim for is a fair and just system where people are held to account for their behaviour,
without being unduly blamed. In any event, your regime of supervision and monitoring of
performance should have detected and corrected these unsafe behaviours.
Human failings can be divided into three broad types and the action needed to prevent further
failings will depend on which type of human failing is involved
Training, comprehensive safe working procedures and equipment design are most important
in preventing mistakes.
When considering how to avoid human failings, bear in mind the fact they do not happen in
isolation. If human failings are identified as a cause of an adverse event, consider the
following factors that can influence human behaviour.
Job factors:
          how much attention is needed for the task (both too little and too much can
          lead to higher error rates)?
          divided attention or distractions are present;
          inadequate procedures;
          time available.
Human factors:
          physical ability (size and strength);
          competence (knowledge, skill and experience);
          fatigue, stress, morale, alcohol or drugs.
Organisational factors:
          work pressure, long hours;
          availability of sufficient resources;
          quality of supervision;
          management beliefs in health and safety (the safety culture).
Step three
Identifying suitable risk control measures
The methodical approach adopted in the analysis stage will enable failings and possible
solutions to be identified. These solutions need to be systematically evaluated and only the
optimum solution(s) should be considered for implementation. If several risk control measures
are identified, they should be carefully prioritised as a risk control action plan, which sets out
what needs to be done, when and by whom. Assign responsibility for this to ensure the
timetable for implementation is monitored.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          89
Learner Manual
Some of these measures will be more difficult to implement than others, but this must not
influence their listing as possible risk control measures. The time to consider these limitations
is later when choosing and prioritising which measures to implement.
Evaluate each of the possible risk control measures on the basis of their ability to prevent
recurrences and whether or not they can be successfully implemented.
In deciding which risk control measures to recommend and their priority, you should choose
measures in the following order, where possible:
          measures which eliminate the risk, e.g. use ‘inherently safe’ products, such as a
          water-based product rather than a hydrocarbon-based solvent;
          measures which combat the risk at source, e.g. provision of guarding;
          measures which minimise the risk by relying on human behaviour, eg safe working
           procedures, the use of personal protective equipment.
In general terms, measures that rely on engineering risk control measures are more reliable
than those that rely on people.
Adverse events might not have occurred at other locations yet, but make an evaluation as to
whether the risks are the same and the same or similar risk control measures are
appropriate.
If there have been similar adverse events in the past why have they been allowed to happen
again? The fact that such adverse events are still occurring should be a spur to ensure that
Which risk control measures should be implemented in the short and long term?
Deciding where to intervene requires a good knowledge of the organisation and the way it
carries out its work. For the risk control measures proposed to be SMART, management,
safety professionals, employees and their representatives should all contribute to a
constructive discussion on what should be in the action plan.
Not every risk control measure will be implemented, but the ones accorded the highest
priority should be implemented immediately. In deciding your priorities, you should be guided
by the magnitude of the risk (‘risk’ is the likelihood and severity of harm). Ask yourself ‘What
is essential to securing the health and safety of the workforce today?’ What cannot be left
until another day? How high is the risk to employees if this risk control measure is not
implemented immediately? If the risk is high, you should act immediately.
You will, no doubt, be subject to financial constraints, but failing to put in place measures to
control serious and imminent risks is totally unacceptable. You must either reduce the risks to
an acceptable level or stop the work.
For those risks that are not high and immediate, the risk control measures should be put into
your action plan in order of priority. Each risk control measure should be assigned a
timescale and a person made responsible for its implementation.
It is crucial that a specific person, preferably a director, partner or senior manager, is made
responsible for ensuring that the action plan as a whole is put into effect.
Which risk assessments and safe working procedures need to be reviewed and
updated?
All relevant risk assessments and safe working procedures should be reviewed after an
adverse event. The findings of your investigation should indicate areas of your risk
assessments that need improving. It is important that you take a step back and ask what the
findings of the investigation tell you about your risk assessments in general. Are they really
suitable and sufficient?
Failing to review relevant risk assessments after an adverse event could mean that you are
contravening the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 regulation
3(3).5
Have the details of adverse event and the investigation findings been recorded and
analysed?
 Are there any trends or common causes which suggest the need for further investigation?
What did the adverse event cost?
In addition to the prompt notification of reportable events to the regulatory authorities you
should ensure that you keep your own records of adverse events, their causes and the
remedial measures taken. This will enable you to monitor your health and safety performance
and detect trends, the common causes of adverse events and so improve your overall
understanding and management of risk.
It is also useful to estimate the cost of adverse events to fully appreciate the true cost of
accidents and ill health to your business. The step by step approach that is set out in this
guide is only one of a number of possible approaches. It is for you to decide which approach
suits your business best
 IAC0201
 Given various accident and incident investigation scenarios identify the extent to which the
 investigations were effective and the appropriate criteria for effective investigations was
 met and motivate the reasons why the criteria is important [20]
       1. KT0301 Explain the potential occupational health hazards and routes of entry into
            the body;
       2. KT0302 Identify the typical occupational hygiene measurements that is taken within
            industry
       3. KT0303 Identify the instruments that are used to take typical occupational hygiene
            measurements with regards to: a. Airborne pollutants; b. Biological agents; c.
            Dermal exposure and surface contamination; d. Physical agents; e. Ergonomics; f.
            Air velocity and pressure; g. Water quality; h. Chemical agents; etc
KT0301 EXPLAIN THE POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH HAZARDS AND ROUTES OF ENTRY INTO THE BODY
Working with chemicals always involves the risk of exposure. The health risk is dependent
upon the toxicity of the chemical, the types of effects and the various routes of entry.
Inhalation In the lung there are no similar mechanisms for selective uptake. Particles less
than 10 micron in diameter may reach the alveoli. If soluble, approximately 40% are then
absorbed. Insoluble chemicals are relatively safer, for example lead sulphide, whereas lead
carbonate is highly soluble and causes poisoning quickly.
Larger inhaled particles are less of a risk as absorption higher up the respiratory tract is less
efficient. It is important to remember that not only is the lung responsible for the uptake of
substances into the body it is also acted on as a target organ. Materials which are not
absorbed into the body can remain in the lungs and cause physical and/or chemical damage
to them. Inhalation accounts for 90% or so of industrial poisoning.
To prevent inhaling hazardous chemicals, you must select and use proper respiratory
protection.
Absorption through the skin is another route of entry. The skin is the largest organ of your
body and a common exposure site for liquid and airborne chemicals. Absorption through the
skin can occur quite rapidly if the skin is cut or abraded. Intact skin is an effective barrier to
many hazardous materials.
Ingestion
Ingestion is the least significant route of entry in industry while in environmental toxicology it
is the most. During evolution, mechanisms have developed in the gut to regulate the uptake
of essential elements. Toxic elements may have to compete so that generally only a fraction
of any ingested dose is absorbed into the body (often 10% or less). Possible causes of
ingestion in industry are mouth pipetting in laboratories, swallowing dust which has been
- toxic materials can be swallowed and enter the body through the gastrointestinal tract. In the
workplace, people can unknowingly ingest harmful chemicals when you eat, drink, or smoke
in a contaminated work area.
Injection occurs when a sharp object punctures the skin, allowing a chemical or infectious
agent to enter your body. For example, injection can occur when a contaminated object such
as a rusty nail punctures the skin.
KT0302 IDENTIFY THE TYPICAL OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE MEASUREMENTS THAT IS TAKEN WITHIN INDUSTRY
We have seen that most of the chemical and physical agents found in industry today are
potentially harmful if they are not handled correctly or are present in excessive quantities in
the workplace environment. The aim of occupational hygiene is to prevent or reduce
exposure to such agents
Hygiene standards or occupational exposure limits (OELs) are useful measures with which
exposures to chemical and physical agents in the workplace environment can be compared.
There are a few key points to remember about hygiene standards, namely:
          They are not an index of toxicity.
          They do not represent a fine demarcation between good and bad practice.
          They are based on the current best available information and are liable to change.
          If there is not a hygiene standard set for a chemical substance, it does not mean that
           substance is safe.
          Good occupational hygiene practice is to keep airborne contaminants to as low a level
           as possible, not to just below the relevant hygiene standard(s).
Setting of Hygiene Standards and Exposure Limits There are three main types of hygiene
standards, those for chemical agents such as gases, vapours, fumes, mists, dusts and
aerosols. Those for physical agents such as noise, vibration, heat, cold and radiation (ionising
and non-ionising) and finally biological exposure indices. When setting hygiene standards for
hazardous agents, the effects the agents might have on the body have to be considered
namely: -
          Contact
          Local toxic effects at the site of contact (skin, eye, respiratory tract etc.)
          Absorption
          Transport, Metabolism, Storage
          Systemic toxic effects, remote from the site of contact (any organ system e.g. blood,
           bone, nervous system, kidney etc.)
          Excretion
          Acute toxicity i.e. the adverse effects occur within a short time of exposure to a single
           dose, or to multiple doses over 24 hours or less e.g. irritation, asphyxiation, narcosis
          Chronic toxicity i.e. the adverse effects occur as a result of a repeated daily exposure
           over a long-time span (weeks, years) e.g. systemic poisons, lung fibrosis,
           (carcinogens) and noise induced hearing loss.
Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL) normally over a 15-minute period are used when
exposure for short periods of time occurs. Ceiling Limits are sometimes used and are
concentrations that should not be exceeded during any part of the working exposure.
"Skin" Notation
Substances that have been assigned a “Skin” notation can have a contributing exposure
effect by the cutaneous route (including mucous membranes and eyes) either by airborne, or
more particularly, by direct contact of the substance with the skin. The exposure limits for
such substances relate to exposure via inhalation only; they take no account of absorption via
skin contact.
It is then necessary to assess whether further control is needed to counteract any increased
risk from the substances acting in conjunction. Expert assessments for some particular mixed
exposures may be available and can be used as guidelines in similar cases. In other cases,
close examination of the toxicological data will be necessary to determine which of the main
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                     99
Learner Manual
types of interaction (if any) are likely for the particular combination of substances concerned;
the various types should be considered in the following order.
Synergistic substances: known cases of synergism are considerably less common than the
other types of behaviour in mixed exposures. However, they are the most serious in their
effects and require the strictest control. They are also the most difficult to assess and
wherever there is reason to suspect such interaction, specialist advice should be obtained.
Additive substances: where there is reason to believe that the effects of the constituents are
additive, and where the WELS are based on the same health effects, the mixed exposure
should be assessed by means of the formula;
C1 + C2 + C3............<1
L1 L2 L3
where C1 C2 etc. are the time weighted average (TWA) concentrations of constituents in air
and L1, L2 etc. are the corresponding Wels. Where the sum of the C/L fractions does not
exceed 1, the exposure is considered not to exceed the notional exposure limit. The use of
this formula is only applicable where L1, L2 etc relate to the same reference period in the
list of approved WELs. This formula is not applicable where the lead health effect is cancer or
respiratory sensitisation. For mixtures containing these substances the overriding duty is to
decrease exposure so far as is reasonably practicable.
Calculation of exposure with regard to the specified reference periods The 8-hour reference
period
The term "8-hour reference period" relates to the procedure whereby the occupational
exposures in any 24-hour period are treated as equivalent to a single uniform exposure for 8
hours (the 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exposure). The 8-hour TWA may be
represented mathematically by:
C1 x T1+ C2 x T2 +....................Cn x Tn
                             8
That is
5 x 150=50ppm
  15
In most cases limits for Biological Monitoring are not statutory and any biological monitoring
undertaken in needs to be conducted on a voluntary basis (i.e. with the fully informed consent
of all concerned). BMGVs are intended to be used as tools in meeting the employer’s primary
duty to ensure adequate control of exposure.
Where a BMGV is exceeded it does not necessarily mean that any corresponding airborne
standard has been exceeded nor that ill health will occur. It is intended that where they are
exceeded this will give an indication that investigation into current control measures and work
practices is necessary. It should also be noted that BMGVs are not an alternative or
replacement for airborne occupational exposure limits.
Health surveillance techniques should be highly sensitive and specific in their ability to detect
effects at an early and reversible stage. They should be safe, preferably non-invasive and
acceptable to the employee.
 Cost is also a consideration. Results of health surveillance should lead to some action of
benefit to the health of employees and the methods of recording and analysis of results and
criteria and options for action should be established before starting out. Biological monitoring
is an integral part of health surveillance and is the measurement of human tissues, fluids or
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                             102
Learner Manual
behaviour in comparison with what is considered to be a normal range of values.
Measurements on individuals must be treated as measurements made in clinical practice and
medical confidentiality applies.
In contrast to environmental monitoring biological monitoring can establish not only exposure
to a particular hazard, but also its effect on an individual or group of people. For example,
personal dose monitoring may give a good indication of exposure to a dust or toxic vapour
but cannot demonstrate its effect on the individual, given that work rate, lung and circulatory
efficiency, fitness, age, genetic variability, percentage fat, sex, medication and alcohol all
have an influence on how much is actually taken up and how it is later metabolised. The risks
to a worker from a toxic material are more directly related to his uptake of that material than
to its concentration in the working environment.
There can be a factor of 4 or so difference in people's uptake under the same conditions and
this justifies biological monitoring. The timing of biological monitoring will depend on the
expected absorption, metabolism and excretion rates and the known half-life of the substance
in question. Mean results of measurements for a number of individuals in a group provide a
better index of exposure than isolated measurements.
With scrupulous sampling techniques, analysis and quality control, biological monitoring can
show up susceptible individuals, uptake within or outside acceptable levels and high
exposure groups of people who may have been missed by environmental monitoring. Ideally
the two forms of monitoring should go hand in hand
KT0303 IDENTIFY THE INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE USED TO TAKE TYPICAL OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE MEASUREMENTS
Occupational hygiene measurements are divided into two parameter scopes; chemical and
physical factors. Some measurement parameters covered by the chemical factors are volatile
organic compounds, formaldehyde, inorganic acids and heavy metals. If we talk about
measurement parameters of physical factors, we can group them under noise, thermal
comfort, lighting, vibration, dust and aerosol measurements.
Measurements of the above-mentioned factors can be performed in two ways and are called
“personal exposure measurements” and “environmental measurements”. Personal exposure
measurements are taken based on the type of the work performed, the exposure factor, and
the exposure duration. Whereas environmental measurements are taken when the work is
not carried out and at a fixed point where the exposure is most likely to be the highest, to
assess the workers’ workplace exposure.
The employer conducts occupational hygiene measurements, tests and analysis based on
the risk assessment. When there is a difference in the workplace environment or the personal
exposures, the occupational physician or the occupational health and safety expert may ask
for the repetition of the occupational hygiene measurements, tests and analysis.
Biological agent
The skin can be prone to the effects of biological agents such as viral injections from animals,
yeast/fungal infections when prolonged contact with water occurs and anthrax infections
where animal products are handled.
Vapour - the gaseous state of a substance which is liquid at 25°C and 760 mm Hg (STP).
Mist - liquid particles, large size generally produced by bubbling, splashing or boiling of a
liquid.
Fume - Solid particles produced by condensation from a liquid or a reaction between two
gases. The particle size of a fume <1 micron (μm) diameter anything larger is considered a
dust particle.
Dust - particles of solid material in the broad size range of 1 micron to millimetre diameter.
Anything of a larger particle size is considered to be grit and will be too heavy to remain
airborne.
Aerosol - general term for the dispersions of solid or liquid particles of microscopic size in a
gaseous medium e.g. fog, smoke etc., although commonly used as a term for fine liquid spray
(e.g. „aerosol can‟).
Fibre - Solid particulate which are long and thin i.e. have a high aspect ratio of
length to breadth
Chemical agents
A wide variety of chemicals in gas, vapor or particle form can become airborne and have
potentially adverse health effects in certain individuals. In cases where exposures are known,
personal protective equipment is available to control contact. It is the unexpected exposure in
areas where risk is not normally assumed that causes concern.
Some common chemicals of special concern include, but are not limited to, lead, radon,
formaldehyde, environmental tobacco smoke and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). VOCs
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                         106
Learner Manual
are a broad class of chemicals containing carbon atoms that tend to give off high levels of
vapor even at room temperature. They typically are found in building materials, cleaners,
solvents, paints, gasoline and other substances.
Some solvents remove the sebum. Any direct skin effects can make the surface more
vulnerable to other agents and reduce the skin's entry defences. The other form of contact
dermatitis is allergic contact dermatitis. This results from sensitising the skin by initial contact
with a substance and subsequent re-contact. A sensitizer (allergen) is a substance that can
induce a specific immunological sensitivity to itself. The initial dose may need to be quite high
and leads to a delayed-type hypersensitivity response mediated by lymphocytes and
involving antibody production. The first dose produces no visible effects but subsequent,
often minute, exposures may lead to dermatitis.
Physical agents
Physical agents which can harm the skin include weather, friction and injury.
Cold, wind and rain cause dry chapped skin, and sunlight can burn or cause skin tumours, so
occupations exposed to the elements (fishing, farming) are at risk. Friction injuries are
common in heavy manual labouring (construction and mining), and sharp equipment used in
many occupations can lead to abrasions and lacerations.
Common irritants include detergents, soaps, organic solvents, acids and alkalis. Common
sensitizers are plants (gardening), antibiotics (pharmaceutical industry), dyes (paint and
cosmetic industry), metals (nickel (usually non-industrial), and chromates (cement industry)),
rubbers and resins. People working with cutting oils can have both irritant and allergic contact
dermatitis, being irritated by the oil itself and allergic to biocides within it.
How to measure?
In most cases, it is difficult to get an accurate picture of the extent of chemical contaminants
in the air using real-time data collection. It is more often a complex mix rather than individual
compounds that pose the difficult challenge. Consequently, sampling is an accepted practice
generally conducted using techniques such as filtration, absorption in another media, or
impaction.
Ergonomics
Ergonomics is about the interactions of people with the machines they operate and their
working environment. It aims to maximise human performance and to minimise discomfort,
dissatisfaction and the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Simply put, ergonomics is all about
fitting the task to the worker. If the match is poor, the best solution is to redesign the work
tasks to make them more compatible with human characteristics. It is less effective to try to
change employee characteristics, for example by improving selection and training;
These applications of ergonomics are discussed below in more detail. In addition, ergonomics
is closely associated with the study of human errors.
Errors tend to happen when the capacity of an individual to cope with the demands of a task
or situation is exceeded. This can be caused by a poorly defined man-machine interface, by
lack of training or competence, or by psychological factors such as stress or fatigue. Errors
can result in accidents, illness or lost productivity. For that reason, in the US, ergonomics is
often called "human factors"
Ergonomists have developed ways of measuring ergonomic strain and have predictive
models for dealing with physical tasks. It is often useful to video the task being performed so
that it can be played back for analysis.
For the determination of the volatile organic compounds in the work environment, sample(s)
are collected by the authorized personnel with the aid of a sampling pump according to the
type of the measurement. The samples reaching our laboratory are analyzed by the Gas
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                        109
Learner Manual
Chromatograph device in accordance with the method specified in TS IS 16200-1 standard,
evaluated according to Annex-1 of the Regulation on Health and Safety Measures in Works
Related to Chemicals and reported in mg/m³ format.
The samples required for the analysis of dust in the workplace are collected by the authorized
personnel with sampling pumps on filters with different pore diameters. The samples reaching
our laboratory are analyzed with the gravimetric analysis method in accordance with the
MDHS 14/3 standard, evaluated based on the Regulation on Dust Control and reported in
mg/m³ format.
Lighting
Lighting is the application of light on the environment and the objects to make them visible.
One of the most important priorities in creating a healthy workplace and a safe working
environment for visual work is appropriate lighting. As the intensity of illumination increases,
the details of the work done are seen more accurately, and with a resulting decrease in the
error rate, there is a high increase in the worker’s performance.
The following parameters should be taken into account to ensure appropriate lighting
conditions for employee health:
Thermal Comfort
          Temperature
          Humidity
          Air flow
          Radiant heat
KT0304 EXPLAIN WHERE THE THRESHOLD LIMITS FOR THE VARIOUS OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE MEASUREMENTS CAN BE
OBTAINED
The threshold limit value ceiling is a guideline to assist with the control of health hazards. It is
the maximum level of exposure to a chemical substance day after day without suffering any
adverse effects.
a. Legal requirements
The Occupational Health and Safety Act places the onus on employers to ensure that the
working environment is safe and without risks to the health of their employees. In order to
accomplish this, employers must, through the services of a competent person, assess the
exposure of their employees to hazardous environmental conditions in the workplace.
The Department of Labour has deemed it unreasonable to expect employers or health and
safety representatives to be specialists in occupational hygiene. Therefore, provision was
made for Approved Inspection Authorities to assist them in complying with certain
requirements of the Act and to recommend steps that will assist in achieving compliance and
thus ensuring a working environment that is safe and free from health risks.
It should be noted that Occupational Hygiene Inspection Authorities (AIAs) are approved by
the Department of Labour for compliance monitoring of specific occupational health hazards.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                            112
Learner Manual
The definition of monitoring is given in Section 4.2 of this guideline. Only compliance
monitoring carried out under the Department of Labour approval certificate are required to be
included in the six-monthly returns referred to in Section 15 of this document.
     14. The AIA must keep a logbook which contains calibration and maintenance schedules
           and records for all relevant equipment for a period of five years
PERSONNEL
EXAMINATION ON LEGISLATION
                 1. All the Occupational Hygiene personnel within the AIA must be in possession
                      of a valid Legal Knowledge Certificate. The Department of Labour will only
ANALYTICAL SERVICES
The AIA will remain accountable for the results obtained from any analytical laboratory.
Therefore prior to using a laboratory for analytical services, the AIA must:
     1. Instruct the laboratory on the specific method of analysis required.
     2. Ensure the analytical laboratory has competent laboratory personnel and is making
           use of nationally/ internationally acceptable standards and is accredited by SANAS in
           terms of SANS 17025.
     3. Appropriate analytical equipment and facilities are available for the tests required. 7.4
           Ensure that an external proficiency testing scheme is used where available and where
           there is no scheme available, agree on the quality assurance procedures to be
           employed.
     4. Have a written agreement with the analytical laboratory.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                           115
Learner Manual
     5. Demand a certified statement from the laboratory that the given method was used and
           any deviation from the method was recorded and the reason for such deviation was
           motivated and the report provided shall reflect all the relevant signatories.
DOCUMENTATION
     1. Approved Inspection Authorities shall, before and after their approvals, have updated
           copies of the following documentation available at all times.
     2. Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993).
     3. Relevant regulations promulgated under the Occupational Health and Safety Act,
           1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993).
     4. Relevant health and safety standards incorporated in the regulations.
     5. Relevant health and safety standards not incorporated into the regulations, which will
           be used by the Approved Inspection Authority.
     6. Literature relating to occupational hygiene relevant to the services offered.
     7. Maintenance schedules and records of instruments.
     8. Valid calibration certificates and records of all relevant instrumentation.
     9. Documented quality management system in accordance with SANS 17020.
     10. The personnel of the AIA shall also be familiar with their contents.
The organisation’s executive board of directors or other senior management controlling body
needs to recognise its role in engaging the active participation of workers in improving safety
and health by:
                          tackling actual problems, rather than being consulted after decisions have
                           been made;
                          making workers aware of their safety and health re • actively promoting
                           and supporting worker participation in all aspects of the safety and health
                           management system;
                          ensuring a safety consultation, employee participation, and representation
                           programme is put in place in compliance with sections 25 and 26 of the
                           2005 Act;
                          promoting partnership for prevention, where workers and the safety
                           representative are involved in identifying hazards and responsibilities.
Consultation and participation arrangements and the extent of their usage will depend on the
size and complexity of the organisation. This may range from informal one-to one discussions
to a more formal safety committee which operates as set out in Schedule 4 of the 2005 Act.
At a minimum, they must address:
                          procedures    to   be   used   to   facilitate   effective   co-operation   and
                           communication on safety and health matters between employer and
                           employees;
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                                117
Learner Manual
                           preparation and revision of the Safety Statement with particular reference
                            to the written procedures covering the role of the Safety Representative,
                            the operation of safety committees, or informal safety discussions by work
                            crews, which might take place as necessary;
                           methods to be used for ensuring a balanced approach to consultation with
                            no one side trying to get the upper hand;
                           legal requirement for consultation to be in advance and in good time of any
                            work that can have a substantial effect on employee safety and health.
Safety Representatives and members of the safety committee, where it exists, must be
trained, in common with all employees, to enable them to make an informed contribution on
safety and health issues.
They should also have access to the positive benefits of an open communications policy and
be closely involved in supporting the safety and health effort through open discussion at
safety and health committee meetings. Effective safety committees should be involved in
planning, measuring and reviewing performance as well as in their more traditional reactive
role of considering the results of accident, ill-health, and incident investigations and other
concerns of the moment.
At all levels should be involved individually or in groups in a range of safety and health
activities. They may, for example, help set performance standards, devise operating systems,
procedures and instructions for risk control, and help in monitoring and auditing. Supervisors
and others with direct knowledge of how work is done can make important contributions to
the preparation of procedures.
Other examples of good co-operation include forming problem-solving teams from different
parts of the organisation to help solve specific problems such as issues arising from an
accident or a case of ill-health. Such initiatives should be supported by management, who
should ensure access to advice from safety and health specialists.
Opportunities to promote involvement also arise through the use of safety audit checklists,
suggestion schemes or safety discussion workgroups, where safety and health problems can
be identified and solved. These too can promote enthusiasm and draw on worker expertise. It
has to be recognised that involving employees may initially increase the potential for short-
term conflict and disagreement about what constitutes safe and healthy working. Such
conflict should be anticipated by supporting the activities of supervisors and managers with
procedures and training to establish when and how specialist advice should be obtained to
resolve problems and disputes.
It may also be helpful to identify when specific investigations should be carried out and any
circumstances in which work should be suspended. Potential conflict is likely to reduce over
time as participants develop more constructive working relationships and shared objectives.
Managers should know the relevant legislation and be able to manage safety and health
effectively. All employees need to be able to work in a safe and healthy manner. It is also
necessary to check the abilities of contractors where they work close to, or in collaboration
with, direct employees. Good arrangements should include:
    •    recruitment and placement procedures that ensure employees (including managers)
         have the necessary physical and mental abilities to do their jobs or can acquire them
         through training and experience; this may require individual fitness assessments by
         medical examination and tests of physical fitness or aptitudes and abilities where work-
         associated risks require it;
    •    systems to identify safety and health training needs arising from recruitment, changes
         in staff, plant, substances, technology, processes, or working practices;
    •    training documentation as appropriate to suit the size and activity of the organisation;
    •    refresher training to maintain or enhance competence, to include where necessary
         contractors’ employees, self-employed people, or temporary workers who are working
         in the organisation
    •    systems and resources to provide information, instruction, training and supporting
         communications
    •    arrangements to ensure competent cover for staff absences, especially for staff with
         critical safety and health responsibilities
    •    general health promotion and surveillance schemes that contribute to the maintenance
         of general health and fitness; this may include assessments of fitness for work,
         rehabilitation, job adaptation following injury or ill-health, or a policy on testing
         employees for drugs or alcohol abuse.
Proper supervision helps to ensure the development and maintenance of competence and is
particularly necessary for those new to a job or undergoing training. The organisation should
identify its training needs and implement a training programme that takes legal requirements
on safety and health training into account (section 10 of 2005 Act). Records of training should
be maintained.
Information Coming into the Organisation Good sources of safety and health intelligence are
as important in developing safety and health policy and performance as market information is
for business development. Organisations should monitor legal developments to ensure
continuing compliance with the law, technical developments relevant to risk control, and
developments in safety and health management practice.
c. Role of safety representatives and employees in ensuring that they work in safe and
healthy environments
Management should develop and incorporate into the Safety Statement a safety and health
policy that recognises that safety and health is an integral part of the organisation’s business
performance.
They should ensure that this safety and health policy:
    •    is appropriate to the hazards and risks of the organisation’s work activities and
         includes a commitment to protect, so far as is reasonably practicable, its employees
         and others, such as contractors and members of the public, from safety and health
         risks associated with its activities;
    •    includes a commitment to comply with relevant safety and health legislation, codes of
         practice and guidelines as a minimum;
    •    provides a framework for measuring performance and ensuring continuous
         improvement by setting, auditing, and reviewing safety and health objectives and
         targets.
    •    is documented, understood, implemented, and maintained at all levels in the
         organisation;
    •    clearly places the management of safety and health as a prime responsibility of line
         management from the most senior executive level to first-line supervisory level;
    •    covers employee safety and health consultation, safety committee meetings where
         they exist, worker participation; and safety representation and includes a commitment
         to provide appropriate resources to implement the policy;
    •    provides for employee co-operation and compliance with safety rules and procedures.
Effective safety and health management demands comprehensive safety and health policies
that fulfil the spirit and the letter of the law, are effectively implemented, and are considered in
all business practice and decision-making.
Organisations achieving high standards of safety and health develop policies that recognise:
Developing a Workplace Safety and Health Policy By law, employers are obliged to plan their
overall approach to managing safety and health and must commit the necessary resources to
implement the plan. As an initial step, employers must develop a safety and health policy
which should form part of the Safety Statement. It must be specific to their organisation and
be in a written format. The content of the safety and health policy of an organisation should
be based on the hazards and risks present in the organisation and should reflect the fact that
systematic hazard identification and risk assessment have been undertaken.
As a minimum, the policy should contain a commitment that safety and health legislation will
be complied with and should specify those responsible for implementing the policy at all
levels in the organisation, including senior managers, first-line managers, and supervisors. It
should also define their safety and health responsibilities. Employees’ responsibilities should
also be addressed.
The safety and health policy should specify the organisation’s commitment to ensuring it will
manage and conduct its work activities, so far as is reasonably practicable, so as to be safe
for employees and others in its workplace, and it will not allow improper conduct or behaviour
which is likely to put safety and health at risk.
In particular, it should specify that adequate resources will be provided for critical safety and
health issues such as the: design, provision and maintenance of a safe place of work for all
employees;
    •    design, provision and maintenance of safe means of access to and egress from each
         part of the workplace;
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       122
Learner Manual
    •    design, provision, and maintenance of any article, plant, equipment or machinery for
         use at work in a safe manner;
    •    provision of systems of work that are planned, organised, performed, maintained or
         revised, so as to be safe, particularly for safety-critical process operations or services;
         • performance of ongoing hazard identification and risk assessments, and compliance
         with the general principles of prevention as set out in the legislation;
    •    provision and maintenance of welfare facilities and PPE;
    •    preparation of emergency plans and the provision of first-aid training;
    •    reporting of accidents and dangerous occurrences to the Authority and their
         investigation;
    •    provision and dissemination of safety and health information, instruction, training and
         supervision as required;
    •    operation of safety and health consultation, employee participation and safety
         representation programmes;
    •    review and keeping up-to-date the safety and health policy in order to prevent adverse
         effects on the safety and health of employees from changing processes, procedures,
         and conditions in the workplace;
    •    appointment of people responsible for keeping safety and health control systems in
         place and making them aware of their responsibilities;
The above list is not exhaustive and the critical safety and health issues that could be
covered by the policy will depend on the risks in the organisation. If the above issues are
adequately covered elsewhere in the Safety Statement or in the safety and health
management system, they might need only to be referred to in the safety and health policy.
Backup documentation may also be referred to in the policy.
The executive board of directors or other senior management controlling body of the
organisation needs to accept formally the contents in the safety and health policy and publicly
acknowledge its collective role in providing safety and health leadership in its organisation by:
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                              123
Learner Manual
        •     committing to continuous improvement in safety and health;
        •     explaining the board’s expectations to senior managers and staff and how the
              organisation will deliver on them;
        •     ensuring the safety statement is a living document, is prepared in consultation with
              workers, is reviewed as conditions change, and is brought to the attention of all
              workers.
3.2 PLANNING
Planning is essential for the implementation of safety and health policies. Adequate control of
risks can be achieved only through co-ordinated action by all members of the organisation.
An effective planning system for safety and health requires a safety and health management
system that:
        •     controls risk and as a minimum complies with safety and health laws;
        •     reacts to changing circumstances and demands;
        •     promotes and sustains a positive safety and health culture and supports continual
              improvement in safety and health performance.
Safety and health objectives and targets should be based on legal and other requirements.
The next step is to formulate a plan to fulfil safety and health policy, objectives, and targets.
The plan should include the following:
    •       setting clear performance standards;
    •       defining work programmes – the plan for achieving each objective; • designating
            responsibilities;
    •       setting time frames for tasks to be completed.
A safety and health plan will help the organisation meet its legal obligations and improve its
performance. It should be reviewed and revised regularly to reflect changes in organisational
safety and health objectives
In addition, each director on the organisation’s board needs to accept their responsibilities in
providing safety and health commitment and leadership by:
    •       ensuring that each member’s actions and decisions at board level always reinforce the
            message in the organisation’s safety statement;
    •       preventing a mismatch between individual board members attitudes, behaviour or
            decisions and the organisation’s safety statement so as not to undermine workers
            belief in maintaining good safety and health standards.
Management Responsibilities Accidents, ill-health, and incidents are seldom random events.
They generally arise from failures of control and involve multiple contributory elements. The
immediate cause may be a human or technical failure, but such events usually arise from
organisational failings which are the responsibility of management. Successful safety and
health management systems aim to utilise the strengths of managers and other employees.
The organisation needs to understand how human factors affect safety and health
performance. Senior executive directors or other senior management controlling body
members and executive senior managers are primarily responsible for safety and health
management in the organisation.
These people need to ensure that all their decisions reflect their safety and health intentions,
as articulated in the Safety Statement which should cover:
    •       the appointment of someone at senior management level with executive responsibility,
            accountability and authority for the development, implementation, periodic review, and
            evaluation of their safety and health management system;
    •       the safety and health ramifications of investment in new plant, premises, processes or
            products. For example such changes could introduce: — new materials – are they
            toxic or flammable, do they pose new risks to employees, neighbours or the public,
            and how will any new risks be controlled? — new work practices – what are the new
            risks, and are managers and supervisors
competent to induct workers in the new practices? — new people – do they need safety and
health training and are they sufficiently competent to do the job safely?
        •    only engaging contractors to do new or ongoing projects that reinforce rather than
             damage the organisation’s safety and health policies;
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                        125
Learner Manual
      •     recognising their continuing responsibility for safety and health even when work is
            contracted out;
      •     providing their customers with the necessary safety and health precautions when
            supplying them with articles, substances, or services;
      •     being aware that although safety and health responsibilities can and should be
            delegated, legal responsibility for safety and health still rests with the employer.
      •     Senior managers’ responsibilities should include:
      •     preparing safety and health policies and consulting employees, including the safety
            committee where it exists, and the Safety Representative, as appropriate;
      •     devising safety and health strategies for key high risks;
      •     setting safety and health objectives and targets for employees;
      •     devising plans to implement the safety and health policy;
      •     ensuring that appropriate organisational structures are in place;
      •     identifying and allocating resources for safety and health;
      •     ensuring that the safety and health policy is effectively implemented, and checking
            whether objectives and targets have been met;
      •     reviewing the effectiveness of the safety and health management system;
      •     implementing any necessary improvements derived from carrying out risk
            assessments;
      •     giving all personnel the authority necessary to carry out individual safety and health
            responsibilities;
Devising appropriate arrangements whereby employees are held accountable for discharging
their responsibilities;
      •     establishing clear and unambiguous reporting relationships;
      •     devising job descriptions that include safety and health responsibilities;
      •     incorporating safety and health performance in the appraisal system where personal
            appraisal systems exist;
      •     Developing safety and health cultures in project teams and team working situations.
      •     Individual Responsibilities Managers and supervisors have direct responsibility for
            the safety and health of employees and activities under their control.
      •     Individual employees have responsibilities for ensuring their own safety as defined by
            the 2005 Act and other relevant safety and health legislation. These responsibilities
            should be clearly allocated and communicated to the various duty holders. Individual
            responsibilities should be stated in the organisation’s Safety Statement. They may
            include providing supervision and carrying out risk assessments.
IAC0301
 Given several occupational hygiene reports covering different stressors be able to:
 a. Determine the extent of legal compliance;       [10]
 b. Grounds for referral for professional inputs.   [12]
        On completion of this section you will be able to understand the principles of safe working
        practices in and around the place of work
1. KT0401 Identify and explain the safety practices required for working environments.
2. KT0402 Identify and explain the health and safety practices relevant to the
   machinery, tools and equipment used in work environments.
3. KT0403 Identify and explain the specific safety practices required for the range of
   work activities relevant to a specific work area
4. KT0404 Identify and explain the emergency preparedness and response relevant to
   work areas.
KT0401 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE SAFETY PRACTICES REQUIRED FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENTS.
     Companies should establish Safe Work Practices/Safe Job Procedures for addressing
     significant hazards or for dealing with circumstances that may present other significant
     risks/liabilities for the company. They should reflect your company's approach to controlling
     hazards.
All safe work practices should be kept in a location central to the work being performed and
readily available to the workforce. Some safe work practices will require specific job
procedures, which clearly set out in a chronological order each step in a process
Work places are to be clean, orderly and in a sanitary condition to the extent that the nature
of work allows
Responsibilities
 It is the Supervisors’ responsibility to train or schedule training on the aforementioned
subject, to note deficiencies and see that they are corrected ASAP. It is the employees’
responsibility to seek training on the aforementioned subject, report deficiencies and see that
they are corrected ASAP. Responsibilities
It is the Supervisors’ responsibility to train or schedule training on the aforementioned subject,
to note deficiencies and see that they are corrected ASAP. It is the employees’ responsibility
to seek training on the aforementioned subject, report deficiencies and see that they are
corrected ASAP.
KT0402 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICES RELEVANT TO THE MACHINERY, TOOLS AND
Only machinery and tools that comply with the relevant requirements and are suitable for the
job at hand may be used at work. The manufacturer’s instructions must always be followed
when operating machinery or using tools. Machinery and tools must be kept in good order
throughout their useful life. The operating of machinery must also be safe for employees
The Government Decree on the Safety of Machinery (or ‘Machinery Decree’) lays down
requirements for the manufacture and design of machinery so as to comply with safety and
health requirements. The Act on the Conformity of Certain Technical Devices to Relevant
Requirements regulates the design and manufacture of some machinery and the
requirements they must comply with.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       130
  Learner Manual
  In addition to the relevant requirements, the safety of all machinery and tools used at the
  workplace must be at least at the level specified in the Occupational Safety and Health Act
  and the Government Decree on the Safe Use and Inspection of Work Equipment, regardless
  of how old the machine or tool is. Old machines must be upgraded to improve their safety as
  technology evolves. Compliance with legislative requirements in fact mandates that many
  machines currently in use must be restructured to make them safer.
  The employer must ensure that employees are given tools that are safe and suitable for the
  job and work circumstances at hand. The selection of tools must also take into account the
  demands of the location and ergonomic requirements. The use of machinery and tools at the
  workplace is provided for in the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Government
  Decree on the Safe Use and Inspection of Work Equipment (the 'Safe Use Decree').
  The employer must ensure that the machinery and tools in use are serviced and maintained
  regularly in order to keep them in good and safe working order throughout their useful life.
  There must be procedures in place at the workplace to fulfil this requirement.
  The condition of machinery and tools must be continuously monitored through inspections,
  testing, measurement and other appropriate means. The employer must employ a competent
  person for managing these duties or outsource this function to an outside expert.
  The employer determines the means to be used for hazard investigation and assessment
  from time to time. For instance, if lifting equipment is used at a workplace, the intervals for
  regular inspections of that equipment must be based on how much of a strain use puts on
  each particular device. If someone at a workplace notices that the using of a particular tool
  creates a hazard or causes harm to any employee, the employer must take immediate action
  to remove the hazard.
  The seller of a machine is responsible for ensuring that operating instructions and any other
  instructions are supplied with the machine. The seller of a used machine must also supply its
  operating instructions to the buyer.
  Requirements concerning the content of operating instructions for machines may be found for
  instance in the appendix to the Machinery Decree. Operating instructions must include for
  instance the following items:
• instructions on how to introduce and use the machine and, if necessary, how to train its
    operators
  Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                     131
  Learner Manual
• information on any personal protective equipment required
• information on maintenance measures to be performed by the user
• instructions for installing, assembling and disassembling the machine.
  It is the employer’s responsibility to instruct you in how to use machinery and equipment
  safely. Always use machinery and equipment and their safety and protective features in
  accordance with the employer’s instructions.
  Ensure that you are aware of the hazards present in your workplace and all the risk factors
  due to equipment in your work environment, regardless of whether you actually use that
  equipment yourself.
Follow all instructions given and take all due care and diligence in using equipment.
If you do not know what to do or have not been instructed, ask the employer.
  The employer is responsible for ensuring that equipment given to employees to use at the
  workplace is safe if appropriately used, in compliance with the relevant requirements and
  suitable for the work and working conditions at hand.
  Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                     132
  Learner Manual
  In practical terms, this means that the employer must ensure of every machine that it is
  correctly installed and in working order before it is taken into production use.
  The employer must systematically investigate and assess the safety of machinery and
  equipment. Machinery safety must also always be assessed whenever production procedures
  or work practices are changed.
  Safety assessment should focus on hazards and harmful impacts in work and working
  conditions caused by:
  In the risk assessment of machinery and equipment, the employer may find it useful to
  consult the SFS-EN ISO 120100 standard (Safety of machinery) and the SFS-ISO/TR 14121-
  2 technical report (Safety of machinery – Risk assessment – Practical guidance and
  examples of methods).
  If, in the investigation and assessment of the hazards caused by a machine, it is found that
  using the machine creates a hazard or causes harm to any employee, the employer must
  take immediate action to eliminate the hazard or harmful impact.
  The employer must provide employees with training and guidance particularly in the use of
  machinery and equipment, specifically:
  The employer must ensure that employees know how to comply with the instructions given.
  The employer must also ensure that every machine is used for the purpose and under the
  conditions specified by the manufacturer.
  The employer must further ensure that the operating and maintenance instructions for each
  machine and piece of equipment are available to employees. The employer must constantly
  monitor the safety and working condition of the workplace and the machinery and equipment
  used there through inspections, testing, measurements and other appropriate means.
  The employer must ensure that every machine is in good working order throughout its useful
  life through regular maintenance and service and by ensuring the faultless operation of
  guidance systems and safety features.
  The employer must have a maintenance system that describes the procedures for keeping
  the machinery and equipment at the workplace in safe working order.
  The employer must also provide for the commissioning inspection, periodic inspections and
  comprehensive inspections of the machinery and equipment listed in the appendix to the Safe
  Use Decree. Such inspections may only be performed by an authorised expert or expert body
  Electricity supply
       1.     Where machinery has an electricity supply, it should be designed, constructed and
             equipped in such a way that all hazards of an electrical nature are or can be
             prevented, in accordance with national law and practice.
       2.     Static electricity
       3. Machinery should be designed and constructed to prevent or limit the build-up of
             potentially dangerous electrostatic charges and be fitted with a discharging system.
       4. Energy supply other than electricity
Effect of climate
. When machinery is used in very high ambient temperatures and/or humidity (such as in
tropical or subtropical regions) or in very low ambient temperatures, consideration in the
design of machinery should be given to the following aspects:
                                  (a) the effect of extreme heat, cold and humidity on machinery;
                                  (b) the acceptability of PPE and the effect of climate on the
                                      protection provided by such equipment;
                                  (c) the effect of high and low ambient temperatures on workers in
                                      terms of fatigue;
                                  (d) the effect of high levels of sunlight;
                                  (e) heat stress problems in non-acclimatized personnel, particularly
                                      when the use of PPE is necessary;
                                  (f) the effect of climate on the stability of chemical substances
                                      used for operating machinery; and
                                  (g) the effect of climate on equipment operation and maintenance
Fire
Machinery should be designed and constructed in such a way as to prevent any risk of fire or
overheating posed by the machinery itself or by gases, liquids, dust, vapours or other
substances produced or used by the machinery.
Explosion
Machinery should be designed and constructed in such a way as to prevent any risk of
explosion posed by the machinery itself or by gases, liquids, dust, vapours or other
substances produced or used by the machinery.
 6.8.2. Where machinery is intended for use in a potentially explosive atmosphere, it should
be designed and manufactured to exclude or minimize ignition sources and comply with any
national laws and standards applicable to explosive atmospheres.
Noise
       •     Machinery should be designed and constructed in such a way that risks resulting
             from the emission of airborne noise are eliminated or reduced to the lowest possible
             level, taking account of technical progress and the availability of means of reducing
             noise, in particular at source.
       •     Where applicable, information should be supplied with the machinery on noise
             emissions, as required by national laws and standards, and on any additional safety
             precautions required. If this advice Safety and health in the use of machinery is
             incomplete, the employer should seek further information from the supplier, and if
             necessary arrange for competent persons to undertake measurements in
             accordance with nationally and internationally recognized standards.
       •     The level of noise to which workers are exposed should not exceed the limits
             established by the competent authority or under internationally recognized
             standards. Noise measurements should be used to quantify the level of exposure of
             workers and compared to nationally or internationally agreed exposure limits.
As regards noise reduction, employers should give consideration to the following, normally
referred to as a hearing conservation programme:
                                  1. the appropriate choice of machinery which emits the least
                                     amount of noise, taking account of the work to be done;
                                  2. Noise reduction by technical means:
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          136
Learner Manual
   I.       Reducing airborne noise, for example with shields, enclosures or sound absorbent
            coverings;
  II.       Reducing structure-borne noise, for example with damping or isolation;
(c) Alternative working methods that require less exposure to noise;
(d) The design and layout of workplaces and workstations;
(e) Organization of work to reduce noise:
(i) Limitation of duration and intensity of exposure; and
(ii) Appropriate work schedules with adequate rest periods;
(f) Appropriate maintenance programmes for machinery, the workplace and workplace
systems
If the risks arising from worker exposure to noise cannot be prevented by other means such
as elimination or engineering control, appropriate, properly fitting personal hearing protectors
should be made available for workers to use at no cost. The provision and use of hearing
protection may be mandatory in conditions specified by national laws and standards.
            Vibration
           Machinery should be designed and constructed in such a way that risks resulting from
            whole-body and hand-transmitted vibration produced by the machinery are reduced to
            the lowest possible level, taking account of technical progress and the availability of
            means of reducing vibration, in particular at source.
           The level of vibration and duration of exposure should not exceed the limits
            established by national laws and standards or internationally recognized standards.
            Vibration measurements should be used to quantify the level of exposures of workers
            and compared to nationally or internationally agreed exposure limits.
           The manufacturer of the machinery should provide information in the relevant
            instruction handbook concerning vibration transmitted by the machinery to the
            operator’s hands, arms or whole body; the instructions should include information
            relating to the aspects of installation, assembly and use that can reduce exposure to
            vibration.
Laser equipment fitted on machinery should be protected in such a way that effective
radiation, radiation produced by reflection or diffusion, and secondary radiation do not
damage health; and optical equipment for the observation or adjustment of laser equipment
fitted on machinery should be designed and fitted so as to prevent any health risk arising from
the laser radiation.
Lightning
          Machinery in need of protection against the effects of lightning when in use should be
           fitted with a system for conducting the electrical charge to earth.
          Access to operating positions and servicing points
          Machinery should be designed and constructed in such a way as to allow safe access
           to all areas where intervention is necessary during operation, adjustment and
           maintenance.
          Isolation of energy sources
          Machinery should be fitted with a means to disconnect and isolate it from all energy
           sources. Such isolators should be clearly identified. They should be capable of being
           locked in the off position if reconnection could endanger workers. Isolators should also
           be capable of being locked in the off position if an operator is unable to check that the
           energy is still cut off because of inaccessibility of areas that require checking or
           because workers are unable to view them from a different Safety and health in the use
           of machinery part of the access area.
          The employer should identify and implement specific procedures for the control of
           hazardous energy. These procedures should include preparation for shut-down, lock-
           out or tag-out, a permit to-work system, and verification of isolation, as part of a formal
           management system. After the energy is cut off, it should be possible to dissipate
           normally any energy remaining or stored in the circuits of the machinery without risk to
           workers.
          As an exception to the requirement laid down in
          certain circuits may remain connected to their energy sources in order, for example, to
           hold parts, to protect information, and to light interiors. In this case, special steps
           should be taken to ensure worker safety.
          Worker intervention
          Machinery should be designed, constructed and equipped in such a way that the need
           for worker intervention is limited. If worker intervention cannot be avoided, it should be
           possible to carry it out easily and safely.
KT0403 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE SPECIFIC SAFETY PRACTICES REQUIRED FOR THE RANGE OF WORK ACTIVITIES
One of the biggest issues facing employers today is the safety of their employees. Workplace
accidents are increasingly common. Organizations have a moral responsibility to ensure the
safety and well-being of their members. Organizational practices that promote safety can also
help a company establish competitive advantage by reducing costs and complying with safety
laws.
Workplace safety can be quite expensive. Unintentional injuries alone cost more than R146.6
billion per year for medical and insurance costs, workers' compensation, survivor benefits,
lost wages, damaged equipment and materials, production delays, other workers' time
losses, selection and training costs for replacement workers, and accident reporting.
State and federal governments strictly regulate organizational safety practices. The
government views safety violations very seriously, and the penalties for violating safety laws
OSHA conducts inspections based on the following priority classifications, which are listed in
order of importance:
     1. Imminent danger. OSHA gives top priority to workplace situations that present an
           "imminent danger" of death or serious injury to employees. The company must take
           immediate corrective action.
     2. Fatality or catastrophe investigations. The second highest priority is given to sites that
           have experienced an accident that has caused at least one employee to die or three
           or more to be hospitalized. Employers must report these events within 8 hours. The
           inspection aims to determine the cause of the accident and whether any violation of
           OSHA standards contributed to it.
     3. Employee complaint investigations. OSHA responds third to employee complaints
           about hazards or violations. The speed with which OSHA responds depends on the
           seriousness of the complaint. Employees may request to remain anonymous.
     4. Referrals from other sources. Consideration is given to referrals of hazard information
           from federal, state and local agencies, individuals, organizations, and the media.
     5. Follow-ups. OSHA sometimes will return to verify that violations have been corrected.
     6. General programmed inspections. OSHA will also inspect an organization if it is a
           high-hazard industry or has a lost workday injury rate that is above the national norm
           for that industry.
SAFETY AUDITS
STEP 1: OBSERVATION.
Stop in the work area for a few moments and observe worker's activities, looking for both safe
and unsafe practices. Use the following guide:
These discussions should help employees recognize and correct their unsafe acts. When
engaging in them, adhere to the following advice:
          If you spot an unsafe act, be non-confrontational. Point out the violation and ask the
           worker to state what he or she was doing and what safety-related consequences may
           arise if such behavior continues. Your goal is to help, not blame. Audits should not
           result in disciplinary actions unless an individual consistently violates safety rules.
          As you observe your employees, encourage them to discuss any safety concerns they
           may have and ask them to offer any ideas for safety improvement.
          Commend any good performance that you observe.
Findings should be recorded in writing. Pursue any item discussed during the audit that
requires follow-up.
Accident investigations determine accident causes so that changes can be made to prevent
the future occurrence of similar accidents. "Near misses" should also be investigated so that
problems can be corrected before serious accidents occur. Supervisors always play a key
role in accident investigations. For minor accidents, investigation may be limited to the
supervisor meeting with the injured worker and filing a report. In large-scale investigations,
the supervisor is usually part of a team of experts, which may also include an engineer,
maintenance supervisor, upper-level manager, and/or safety professional.
          making sure the injured are cared for and receive medical attention, if necessary;
          guarding against a more dangerous secondary event by removing danger sources
           and evacuating other personnel from the area if necessary; and
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                            143
Learner Manual
          restricting access to the area so no one else will be harmed, and so the scene will not
           be disturbed.
You should then begin an investigation to identify both the immediate and underlying causes
of the accident. The immediate cause is the event that directly led to the accident, such as a
slippery floor, failure to wear safety gear, or failure to follow proper procedures.
Immediate causes, while easily found, are not always very helpful in suggesting how future
incidents of this nature can be avoided. To accomplish this aim, the investigator must
discover the underlying cause of the accident. For example, suppose a worker slips and falls
on spilled oil. The oil on the floor is the immediate cause of the accident, but you need to
know why it was not cleaned up and why a machine was leaking oil in the first place. Poor
training, lack of rule enforcement, low safety awareness, poor maintenance, or crowded work
areas commonly underlie accidents.
The investigator should ensure the accident scene is kept intact until the investigation is
finished, as this will be the only chance to view the scene exactly as it was at the time of the
accident. If a camera is available, photographs of the scene should be taken. Nothing related
to the incident should be destroyed or discarded. The investigator should inspect the location
(e.g., check for chemicals, broken pieces of machinery) and interview injured or affected
workers, eyewitnesses, and anyone else who may be familiar with the accident area.
Interviews should be conducted immediately, while the incident is still fresh in everyone's
mind. Individuals should give their own account of the incident; by letting them tell their
stories without interruption, the investigator can determine if the various responses
corroborate one another. Continue asking why until the underlying causes surface. Once the
causes are identified, the investigator should recommend any changes indicated by the
findings.
Safety in the workplace works most effectively with a combination of employer attentiveness
and employee responsibility. Costs, both financial and physical, can be decreased and
injuries reduced with proper training, employer involvement and company-wide adherence to
OSHA rules and guidelines. Ensuring safety is important for not only each individual company
and worksite, but for industries and national concerns as well.
KT0404 IDENTIFY AND EXPLAIN THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE RELEVANT TO WORK AREAS.
 The best way is to prepare to respond to an emergency before it happens. Few people can
think clearly and logically in a crisis, so it is important to do so in advance, when you have
time to be thorough.
Brainstorm the worst-case scenarios. Ask yourself what you would do if the worst
happened. What if a fire broke out in your boiler room? Or a hurricane hit your building head-
on? Or a train carrying hazardous waste derailed while passing your loading dock? Once you
have identified potential emergencies, consider how they would affect you and your workers
and how you would respond
An emergency action plan covers designated actions employers and employees must take to
ensure employee safety from fire and other emergencies. Not all employers are required to
establish an emergency action plan. See the flowchart on page 11 to determine if you are.
Even if you are not specifically required to do so, compiling an emergency action plan is a
good way to protect yourself, your employees, and your business during an emergency.
Putting together a comprehensive emergency action plan that deals with all types of issues
specific to your worksite is not difficult.
You may find it beneficial to include your management team and employees in the process.
Explain your goal of protecting lives and property in the event of an emergency, and ask for
their help in establishing and implementing your emergency action plan. Their commitment
and support are critical to the plan’s success
When developing your emergency action plan, it’s a good idea to look at a wide variety of
potential emergencies that could occur in your workplace. It should be tailored to your
worksite and include information about all potential sources of emergencies. Developing an
emergency action plan means you should do a hazard assessment to determine what, if any,
physical or chemical hazards in your workplaces could cause an emergency. If you have
more than one worksite, each site should have an emergency action plan.
                Names, titles, departments, and telephone numbers of individuals both within and
                 outside your company to contact for additional information or explanation of duties
                 and responsibilities under the emergency plan;
                Procedures for employees who remain to perform or shut down critical plant
                 operations, operate fire extinguishers, or perform other essential services that
                 cannot be shut down for every emergency alarm before evacuating; and
          Your plan must include a way to alert employees, including disabled workers, to
           evacuate or take other action, and how to report emergencies, as required. Among
           the steps you must take are the following:
          Make sure alarms are distinctive and recognized by all employees as a signal to
           evacuate the work area or perform actions identified in your plan;
          Make available an emergency communications system such as a public-address
           system, portable radio unit, or other means to notify employees of the emergency and
           to contact local law enforcement, the fire department, and others; and
          Stipulate that alarms must be able to be heard, seen, or otherwise perceived by
           everyone in the workplace. You might want to consider providing an auxiliary power
           supply in the event that electricity is shut off
         A disorganized evacuation can result in confusion, injury, and property damage. That
         is why when developing your emergency action plan, it is important to determine the
         following:
In the event of an emergency, local emergency officials may order you to evacuate your
premises. In some cases, they may instruct you to shut off the water, gas, and electricity. If
you have access to radio or television, listen to newscasts to keep informed and follow
whatever official orders you receive.
In other cases, a designated person within your business should be responsible for making
the decision to evacuate or shut down operations. Protecting the health and safety of
everyone in the facility should be the first priority. In the event of a fire, an immediate
evacuation to a predetermined area away from the facility is the best way to protect
employees. On the other hand, evacuating employees may not be the best response to an
emergency such as a toxic gas release at a facility across town from your business.
The type of building you work in may be a factor in your decision. Most buildings are
vulnerable to the effects of disasters such as tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, or explosions.
The extent of the damage depends on the type of emergency and the building’s construction.
Modern factories and office buildings, for example, are framed in steel and are structurally
more sound than neighbourhood business premises may be. In a disaster such as a major
earthquake or explosion, however, nearly every type of structure will be affected. Some
buildings will collapse and others will be left with weakened floors and walls.
           You also may find it beneficial to coordinate the action plan with other employers
           when several employers share the worksite, although OSHA standards do not
           specifically require this.
           If you prepare drawings that show evacuation routes and exits, post them prominently
           for all employees to see.
           If you have operations that take place in permit-required confined spaces, you may
           want your emergency action plan to include rescue procedures that specifically
           address entry into each confined space. (See also OSHA Publication 3138, Permit-
           Required Confined Spaces, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
           Health (NIOSH) Publication 80-106, Criteria for a Recommended Standard...Working
           in Confined Spaces.)
           If an infirmary, clinic, or hospital is not close to your workplace, ensure that onsite
           person(s) have adequate training in first aid. The         Red Cross, some insurance
           providers, local safety councils, fire departments, or other resources may be able to
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          151
Learner Manual
           provide this training. Treatment of a serious injury should begin within 3 to 4 minutes
           of the accident.
           The best emergency action plans include employees in the planning process, specify
           what employees should do during an emergency, and ensure that employees receive
           proper training for emergencies.
           When you include your employees in your planning, encourage them to offer
           suggestions about potential hazards, worst-case scenarios, and proper emergency
           responses. After you develop the plan, review it with your employees to make sure
           everyone knows what to do before, during and after an emergency.
           Keep a copy of your emergency action plan in a convenient location where employees
           can get to it or provide all employees a copy. If you have 10 or fewer employees, you
           may communicate your plan orally.
             You also may wish to train your employees in first-aid procedures, including protection
             against bloodborne pathogens; respiratory protection, including use of an escape-only
             respirator; and methods for preventing unauthorized access to the site.
             Once you have reviewed your emergency action plan with your employees and
             everyone has had the proper training, it is a good idea to hold practice drills as often
             as necessary to keep employees prepared. Include outside resources such as fire and
             police departments when possible. After each drill, gather management and
             employees to evaluate the effectiveness of the drill. Identify the strengths and
             weaknesses of your plan and work to improve it
Emergency Response
Emergency response team members should be thoroughly trained for potential crises and
physically capable of carrying out their duties. Team members need to know about toxic
hazards in the workplace and be able to judge when to evacuate personnel or when to rely on
outside help (e.g., when a fire is too large to handle). One or more teams must be trained in:
             Use of various types of fire extinguishers.
             First aid, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and self-contained
              breathing apparatus (SCBA).
             Requirements of the OSHA bloodborne pathogens standard. • Shutdown
              procedures.
             Chemical spill control procedures.
             Search and emergency rescue procedures.
             Hazardous materials emergency response.
unknown atmospheres with inadequate oxygen or toxic gases, fires, live electrical wiring, or
similar emergencies need appropriate personal protective equipment.
Medical Assistance First aid must be available within 3 to 4 minutes of an emergency.
Worksites more than 3 to 4 minutes from an infirmary, clinic, or hospital should have at least
one person on-site trained in first aid (available all shifts), have medical personnel readily
available for advice and consultation, and develop written emergency medical procedures.
It is essential that first aid supplies are available to the trained first aid providers, that
emergency phone numbers are placed in conspicuous places near or on telephones, and
prearranged ambulance services for any emergency are available. It may help to coordinate
an emergency action plan with the outsider responders such as the fire department, hospital
emergency room, EMS providers and local HAZMAT teams.
Review your plan with all your employees and consider requiring annual training in the plan.
Also offer training when you do the following:
                Develop your initial plan;
                Hire new employees;
                Introduce new equipment, materials, or processes into the workplace that affect
                 evacuation routes;
                Change the layout or design of the facility; and
                Revise or update your emergency procedures. No matter what kind of business
                 you run, you could potentially face an emergency involving hazardous materials
                 such as flammable, explosive, toxic, noxious, corrosive, biological, oxidizable, or
                 radioactive substances.
The source of the hazardous substances could be external, such as a local chemical plant
that catches on fire or an oil truck that overturns on a nearby freeway. The source may be
within your physical plant. Regardless of the source, these events could have a direct impact
on your employees and your business and should be addressed by your emergency action
plan.
If you use or store hazardous substances at your worksite, you face an increased risk of an
emergency involving hazardous materials and should address this possibility in your
emergency action plan. OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard requires employers who
use hazardous chemicals to inventory them, keep the manufacturer-supplied Material Safety
Data Sheets (MSDSs) for them in a place accessible to workers, label containers of these
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          154
Learner Manual
chemicals with their hazards, and train employees in ways to protect themselves against
those hazards.
 A good way to start is to determine from your hazardous chemical inventory what hazardous
chemicals you use and to gather the MSDSs for the chemicals. MSDSs describe the hazards
that a chemical may present, list the precautions to take when handling, storing, or using the
substance, and outline emergency and first-aid procedures
 IAC0401
 Given various scenarios of safe and unsafe acts and work conditions with different
 practices being applied be able to:
 a. Identify correct safe work practices
 b. identify equipment that is unsafe or defective
 c. Identify relevant emergency preparedness responses
   On completion of this section you will be able to understand the criteria and standards for
   effective documentation and document control
        1. KT0501 Explain the document and record classification process for Occupational
             Health and Statutory documentation and records (Long retention period); b.
             Confidential documents and records; c. Resources and reference material; d. Other
             media (manuals, DVDs drawings etc.)
        2. KT0502 Describe the principles for record keeping and archiving documents.
        3. KT0503 Describe the principles for backup and retention of critical documents and
             records. a. Retention periods; b. Review and updates; c. Disposals (NQF Level: 4)
        4. KT0504. Explain the principles of document and record security: a. Statutory
Copyright © All requirements;
                Rights Reserved   b. Classified documents; c. Unclassified documents. d. Access
                                                                                            156
KT0501 EXPLAIN THE DOCUMENT AND RECORD CLASSIFICATION PROCESS FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND STATUTORY
In order to comply with its legal obligations concerning the security of personal information
under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA), and to protect its interests in respect of business
sensitive information, Companies should ensure that documents and records containing such
information are kept appropriately.
Occupational health practitioners must make themselves aware of specific legislation that
covers employee rights when dealing with patient data
Occupational health advisers are required to keep a range of records in order to
          provide a baseline for the health status of staff and identify those with special health
           needs;
 identify patterns of ill health and work areas with specific risk;
          help management in its responsibility for the notification of accidents and ill health, as
           well as for medical examinations required by law;
          due to someone exercising statutory powers that enable him or her to receive such
           information.
           Occupational health records should be stored in a secure system and the confidential
           information should only be accessible by staff within the occupational health
           department.
           An employee can make a data subject access request (DSAR) in order to obtain
           personal data held about them by their employer under s.7 of the DPA, which can
           include data relating to their health or medical records. However, an employer will not
           be required to disclose such data in response to a DSAR if disclosure would be likely
           to cause serious harm to the physical or mental health of the employee or any other
           person.
Retention of records
Reference materials are various sources that provide background information or quick facts
on any given topic
OHS uses reference materials which includes interpretations and directives, white papers,
guidance documents, how-to guides, and more!
           The Media is the most used source of work health and safety information for
           employers and sole traders operating in the Agriculture, forestry and fishing and
           Accommodation and food services industries. The most common source from which
           something was learnt about work health and safety for South African business owners
           (employers and sole traders) was the Media. The most common sources for South
           African workers were
           Training courses have been a popular source of learning about work health and safety
           for workers overall over the past years. The Media has consistently been an important
           source of work health and safety information for all worker. Since 2010, the Internet
           has become an increasingly popular method of learning about work health and safety.
           In 2014 employers indicated that they either provided their workers with information or
           notified workers about work health and safety policies and procedures through walks
           around the workplace alone or with other managers through informal communication
           with workers and during meetings on work health and safety with management and
           through notice boards.
           employers most commonly provided to their workers or workers obtained work health
           and safety information during a walk around the workplace either alone or with
           managers and through informal communication with work mates about work health
           and safety. Employers commonly provided information about work health and safety
           to part-time/ casual workers and full-time workers. One third of employers indicated
           that they provided work health and safety information to contractors/ sub-contractors.
           Employers operating in Construction and Transport, postal and warehousing were
           more likely to provide information to contractors/ subcontractors and to apprentices/
           trainees than employers operating in the other priority industries.
KT0502 DESCRIBE THE PRINCIPLES FOR RECORD KEEPING AND ARCHIVING DOCUMENTS.
The overall principles of record-keeping, whether you are writing by hand or making entries to
electronic systems, can be summed up by saying that anything you write or enter must be
honest, accurate and non-offensive and must not breach patient confidentiality. If you follow
these four principles, your contribution to record-keeping will be valuable.
           When you’re writing, always follow the principles described in the section written
           communication and remember, if you find something you feel is significant when you
           are working with a patient/client, your first duty is to report it to the registered nurse in
           charge before you would consider writing it in the patient’s/client’s record. Always
           report first, record later.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                             161
Learner Manual
     1. Accountability - Assign a senior executive who will oversee and be accountable for
           record keeping program (aka information governance program, or IGP) and
           delegate program responsibility to appropriate individuals; adopt policies and
           procedures to guide personnel and ensure program auditability. Make all business
           managers accountable for information governance and the records management
           principles, policies, and costs.
     2. Integrity - Construct an IGP so that records generated or managed by or for the
           organization have a reasonable and suitable guarantee of authenticity and reliability.
           Identify technologies and processes that can provide suitable and reasonable
           guarantees. To do this of course requires an organization to first define and classify
           the difference between official records and business information.
     3. Protection - The IGP must ensure a reasonable level of protection to records and
           information that are private, confidential, privileged, secret, or essential to business
           continuity. These attributes are the core differentiators when comparing content
           management to records management systems.
     4. Compliance - The IGP must be established to comply with applicable and
           jurisdictional laws, regulations, and the organization’s policies. The challenge for most
           organizations is not developing policies but instead enforcing these policies across a
           vast number of information repositories and file systems.
     5. Availability - The IGP must maintain records in a manner that ensures timely,
           efficient, and accurate retrieval of needed information, as more and more
           organizations are turning to information governance and IGP to do more than meet
           compliance regulations.
     6. Retention - Maintain records and other information for an appropriate time (and for no
           longer), taking into account business, legal, regulatory, fiscal, operational, and
           historical requirements.
     7. Disposition - An IGP provides for the deletion for records that have no incremental
           business value or that create liability for the business.
     8. Transparency - The IGP must be implemented in a defensible, understandable, and
           efficient manner and be available and understood by internal and external business
           stakeholders.
Archival keeping
The document and records which are no longer current, but which are required to be
preserved for a specified period of time or permanently under the applicable laws/ rules/
regulations shall be archived by the Company.
     Documents and records which are no longer required or upon the expiration of the
     specified period of time for preservation may be destroyed in one of the following ways:
General
KT0503 DESCRIBE THE PRINCIPLES FOR BACKUP AND RETENTION OF CRITICAL DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS
Backing-up is a crucial process that everyone should do in order to have a fail-safe, for when
the inevitable happens. The principle is to make copies of particular data in order to use those
copies for restoring the information if a failure occurs (a data loss event due to deletion,
corruption, theft, viruses etc.).
You can perform the backup manually by copying the data to a different location, or
automatically using a backup program
Each program has its own approach in executing the backup, but there are four common
backup types implemented and generally used in most of these programs: full backup,
differential backup, incremental backup and mirror backup. A type of backup actually
defines how data is copied from source to destination and lays the grounds of a data
repository model (how the back-up is stored and structured).
RETENTION OF RECORDS
 Owing to various legislative requirements, documents must be retained for a certain number
of years, depending on the legislation.
This guide refers to the legislation and identifies the timeframe in which certain documents
have to be kept.
The guide does not attempt to include all legislation, but only refers to the general legislation
that impacts on a wide variety of entities.
The guide has been compiled to assist SAICA members to meet the legislative requirements
when they deal with clients.
The guide is structured to refer to the relevant Act and then to the documents that should be
kept and to the period of retention.
Where different legislation refers to the retention of the same records/information, business
must consider adhering to the most stringent of the legislative requirements. For example the
Value Added Tax Act states that invoices should be kept for 5 years from the submission of
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                             165
Learner Manual
the return. However, the Companies would require the financial records to be kept for a
minimum of 7 years and therefore the company should adhere to the most stringent
requirement of 7 years. Where legislation refers to different records (e.g. employment records
versus accounting records), then each requirement is specific to that legislation and should
be applied accordingly to the specific records.
It is important to note that the Companies Act, No 71 of 2008, has a general requirement, in
respect of any information that a company is required to keep (whether in terms of the
Companies Act or any other legislation), to retain such information for a period of at least
seven years (or the longer period specified in the applicable legislation). Therefore,
companies should ensure that company records and information are retained for no less than
seven years.
The Protection of Personal Information Bill (B9D) has been approved by Parliament, but at
the date of the publication of the guide had not yet been signed by the President. It is
important to be aware that section 14 of the Protection of Personal Information Bill states that
personal information must not be retained for any longer than is necessary to achieve the
purpose for its collection. If there is no legal requirement to keep the information, it should be
deleted. The Bill therefore places an obligation on the person collecting the data to delete or
remove it at a certain
After an entity ceases to exist, other legislation may require records to be retained, but
typically only for a period of time and no longer “indefinitely”. In the case of liquidation or
sequestration in terms of the Insolvency Act, No 24 of 1936, specific requirements apply to
the retention of documents, discussed under Section 10 “Insolvency and Liquidation” below.
As a company that has been deregistered can be re-registered, or litigation may follow in
respect of the deregistered company, we propose that the records of a deregistered company
be retained for a reasonable period after deregistration (we propose no less than three
years).
CRITERIA
Legal Factors One important factor to understand is that retention periods stated for any
regulatory or statutory purpose are considered minimum retention periods – the shortest
period of time a record must be held. Legally compliant retention schedules should be viewed
as the time when disposing of a record can first be considered, rather than when you must
dispose of a record. Decisions are frequently made to retain records longer than their
prescribed minimum due to other factors; an on-going business use, internal audit
requirements or historical value.
Whenever retention periods are lengthened, a determination must be made identifying the
potential risks and costs to the company.         It is also desirable to review pertinent statutes of
limitations when determining records retentions. Statutes of limitations define the time period
an organization can sue or be sued on a matter, or the time period in which a government
agency can conduct an investigation or audit. While statutes of limitations in themselves are
not required retention periods, they should be a factor in determining risk for a company when
deciding how long to retain records. A decision can also be made to eliminate
Records before the prescribed minimum retention period has run. Such a decision will have
its own set of risks that should be carefully considered. All decisions relating to extending or
shortening prescribed retention periods should be documented and retained.                       This
documentation will help others to understand why such decisions were made, which may be
pertinent in subsequent litigation to support the reasonableness of the records policies, as the
cases discussed below demonstrate.
Business Factors By understanding how a record is used within a company, better decisions
can be made about the retention of that record. The best method to determine a record’s
retention is using the team approach -- a team that includes the records manager, legal
counsel, business manager, technology manager and a representative from the area or
department that creates or uses the record. The collective knowledge of this team will enable
informed records retention decisions. Implementation
Once retention periods have been determined, agreed upon and signed off by management,
the next step is to develop the policies and procedures that will govern the implementation of
the schedules.            One of the most important policies relates to the suspension of records
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                           167
Learner Manual
destruction in the event of imminent or current litigation, receipt of subpoenas, government
inquiries, audits, or any other type of event that might warrant such action. When the records
may be needed beyond the defined retention period, a methodology should be in place which
immediately notifies all appropriate persons of these actions.    These persons might include
legal counsel, the records manager, a departmental manager and the IT manager, especially
to preserve electronic records.        Depending on the matter, such notification may include
everyone in the company.
ELECTRONIC RECORDS
Is There a Difference?
Electronic records compound the issues involved in the overall management of records
because there are frequently multiple copies in multiple locations. A business decision must
be made to identify who is the responsible party for retaining electronic records – is it the
creator or the user of the document, is it the sender or the recipient of e-mail? A widely
applied rule is that the creator of the document, either an e-mail or other electronic record,
has the responsibility for retaining that document in the “official” electronic file cabinet. As
many companies do not utilize record keeping software, there should be space on the
Company network aligned to the hard copy filing schema that permits saving the documents
for long-term use, which would include transferring pertinent e-mail records -- received or
sent -- from the e-mail system into the electronic filing cabinet. Ask the question -- if the
document were in paper format, what would be done? If it would be filed in the official file,
then the electronic version deserves the same respect and should be placed in the official
electronic file. If the paper version would be thrown away, the electronic version should be
deleted from the in-box.
Recipients of outside e-mail which has legitimate business content should file those e-mails in
the same manner. Rogue Copies Even when a policy is followed conscientiously for filing or
deleting the official electronic record, there may still be rogue copies – copies being held in
other work stations within the company and copies that were sent outside the company. Is it
possible to effectively destroy all copies of an electronic document when its retention period
expires? In most instances the answer is -- no.
A reasonable attempt should be made to remove unnecessary electronic records, per the
retention schedule in all identified electronic repositories. Employee education, together with
approved policies and procedures, will help reduce the number of copies being saved
individually.        The key is to have approved policies and procedures in place, employees
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                      168
Learner Manual
trained in their responsibilities, and program audits conducted on a regular basis to ensure
full compliance with the policies in the regular course of business.
Obsolescence Another critically important factor to be considered for electronic records is the
inevitability of hardware, software and media obsolescence.          These records must either be
migrated to new versions or the old hardware and software must be retained in order to read
the records. Migrating may also cause the records to change or lose their format, so good
quality control procedures must be in place when migrating to ensure all information retains
its original content, context and structure.
The language in the laws that directly impact electronic records should also be reviewed
when determining the retention method for electronic records.              The Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act (UETA) requires two elements for the retention of electronic records (See
Section 12) “(a) If a law requires that a record be retained, the requirement is satisfied by
retaining an electronic record of the information in the record which:
Retention period
2. STATE-OWNED ENTITIES
Public Finance Management Act State-owned entities have to apply the Public Finance
Management Act, No. 1 of 1999 (PFMA). Entities that fall under the definition of the PFMA
are National and Provincial Government, which would include entities such as The Human
Rights Commission, the Competition Board, Eskom, Denel, etc. The PFMA has a list of all the
entities that it applies to in the Schedules attached to the Act.
Paragraph 40(1)(a) of the PFMA states that: “The accounting officer for a department, trading
entity or constitutional institution must keep full and proper records of the financial affairs of
Accounting officers must retain all financial information in its original form as follows:
(1) Information relating to one financial year – should be retained for one year after the audit
report for the relevant financial year has been tabled in Parliament or the provincial
legislature. (2) Information relating to more than one financial year – should be retained for
one year after the audit report for the last of the financial years to which the information
relates.
If the retention period has expired the information may be stored in an alternative form that
still ensures the integrity and reliability of the information.
The Treasury Regulations section 17(2) to the PFMA provides the detailed guidance to this
section of the PFMA regarding the retention of documents.
State-owned entities that are registered companies must comply with the requirements that
are the most stringent between the companies act and PFMA.
Municipal Finance Management Act The Municipal Finance Management Act, No. 56 of
2003, (MFMA) applies to all municipalities and municipal entities and has as its goal to secure
sound and sustainable management of the financial affairs of municipalities and other
institutions in the local sphere of government.
Due to the absence of more specific guideline, we advise that the same periods as for the
PFMA are used, except where specific other regulations are available for use in the various
industries.
                     Document                                                        Retention
                                                                                     Period
       1.            Accounting records, including supporting scheduled to           15 Years
                     accounting records and ancillary accounting records
       2.            Amended Founding statements, including annual accounts          Indefinite
                     and the report of accounting officer
       3.            Annual financial statements, including annual accounts and      15 Years
                     the report of the accounting officer
       4.            Founding statement                                              indefinite
       5.            Microfilm image of any original record reproduced directly by   indefinite
                     the camera-“camera master’
       6.            Minutes books as well as resolution passed at meetings          indefinite
4. LABOUR RELATIONS
Employee relations are governed by a variety of legislation, including the Basic Conditions of
Employment Act and the Labour Relations Act.
The Basic Conditions of Employment Act, No. 75 of 1997, states that various documents
relating to employees should be kept for future reference
The Labour Relations Act, No. 66 of 1995, applies to employees, employers, trade unions
and employers’ organizations and provides a framework where the parties can collectively
bargain regarding remuneration, basic conditions of service and other matters of importance.
Various records relating to the structures created in this Act have to be kept for future
reference.
 In addition, the review may include process improvement from internal or external audits or
where risk control measures have failed to work as expected to determine whether the
process was inadequate, inappropriate or otherwise flawed. For some documents this may
need to be more frequent depending on changes in legislation, corrective actions arising from
incidents or to aid in continuous improvement. Such a need will be identified in the Review
section of the document.
 All document reviews will be communicated via the OHS Committee meeting minutes. On a
monthly basis the document control register will be reviewed to determine those documents
requiring review. Staff of the OHS Unit will be assigned for documents that require review.
The person allocated to the review will have sufficient skills, knowledge experience and
abilities in the subject matter and the document review process to fulfil these documented
requirements.            The review will be completed as per the requirements of the legislative
compliance review outlined in the OHS Legislative Compliance Guidelines. The documents
are assessed for their compliance to this guideline by internal OHS verification audits
           c.disposal
When a record is no longer required to be kept, it should be properly destroyed and the destr
uction should be documented. A sample Certificate of Records Destruction form is attached.
For example, information entered on the form could be:
Deleting data and emptying the “recycle” folder or “trash” bin from electronic storage media
such as CDs, hard drives, tapes, etc. does not permanently destroy the information. Some
printers and photocopiers with document memory capability may require data cleaning also
before sale or disposal. If data is not sensitive or private, simply overwriting the information
may be adequate. If computers and media are going to be reused or decommissioned, they
must be properly cleaned in order to prevent unauthorized retrieval and use of information,
especially if that data includes privacy or security related material such as personnel records,
financial data, or employee health information.
To completely remove data or prevent its retrieval, the following methods should be used.
Hard drives, USB or flash drives, and other plugin type devices: Sanitize by running special
software programs or following the manufacturer’s instructions for full chip erasure.       For
Windows operating systems, Active Eraser is one product that erases files and hard drives.
It is available at http://www.active‐eraser.com/features.htm. Another is Eraser by Tolvanen at
http://www.tolvanen.com/eraser/.
Macintosh operating systems will need a third‐party utility such as Jiiva Auto Scrubber
(http://www.jiiva.com/) for version 10.2 file deletion and Jiiva Super Scrubber for hard drives.
Versions 10.3 and 10.4 have built in Secure Empty Trash options; however, 10.3 also needs
a third-party utility such as JiivaSuper Scrubber for hard drives. Version 10.4 also requires
Apple Disk Utility (Zero all data, 7‐ and 35Pass Erase) for empty space deletion and hard
drive cleaning. If the drive is no longer operational, cables should be cut and the drive
disassembled. Its platters should be damaged by drilling holes, hammering, or cutting with
metal snips.
Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), Blackberry, etc.: Clean data according to manufacturer’s
instructions and reset to factory defaults. Remove batteries for several hours. Alternatively,
wrap securely to prevent flying particles and hammer until the internal parts are destroyed.
Removable media:                  Special shredders are available that can shred optical media (CDs,
DVDs, etc.). Diskettes or other media not suitable for shredding should be disassembled and
the media mutilated by puncturing, cutting, or sanding.
Magnetic tape: Degaussing11 tailored for the type of tape and with proper coercivity.12
Alternatively, incineration, pulverization, or shredding may be used. If the data sanitizing
process is contracted to an outside party, the vendor should sign an agreement stating that
their practices conform to or exceed the guidelines stated here.
In exchange for the privilege of doing business within a state, a statutory entity, such as a
corporation or a limited liability company (LLC), must comply with a wide variety of state
requirements. Among them is the requirement that the entity maintain a statutorily prescribed
set of records related to that entity.
a. Statutory requirements
Each state’s business entity statutes specify the recordkeeping requirements for corporations
and limited liability companies. As is generally the case in state law, there is wide variation
regarding which documents must be kept. While most states impose more extensive
recordkeeping requirements on entities formed in that state, states may also require that
foreign entities maintain records of ownership at the entity’s home office or at its registered or
transfer office. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of the rules—not only for the entity’s
home state but for each state in which it operates
Ownership documents. These include shareholder lists for corporations and member lists
for LLCs. Most states require disclosure of the full name and address of each shareholder or
member.
Operating documents. These contain the entity’s internal rules. For corporations, the main
operating document is the by-laws. For LLCs, the operating agreement serves this purpose.
A significant number of states require that the LLC keep a copy of its operating agreement at
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       177
Learner Manual
its principal place of business. The bulk of the states also mandate keeping a copy of all
amendments made to the operating documents
Tax and financial records. A significant number of states require that some type of tax or
financial records be maintained. For LLCs, the requirement is frequently the three most
recent tax returns. For corporations, the most recent annual report or financial statement will
usually suffice
b. Classified documents
Imposing a classification system can also mitigate some organisational risks. AS ISO 15489
further explains the need for controlling titling and description, particularly in a large and
complex organisation:
The higher the level of accountability and/or public scrutiny, the greater the need for accuracy
and speed in locating individual records. The greater the risks in the business activity, for
example public safety concerning hazardous chemicals, the greater the need for precision
and control in retrieval
Classifying records and business information by functions and activities moves away from
traditional classification based on organisational structure or subject. Functions and activities
provide a more stable framework for classification than organisational structures that are
often subject to change through amalgamation, devolution and decentralisation. The structure
of an organisation may change many times, but the functions an organisation carries out
usually remain much the same over time. Within the government sector, administrative
change may periodically result in the loss or gain of functions between agencies. In these
instances, functional classification makes it much easier for agencies to identify records that
have to follow functions.
Classification by function is based on the context of a records creation and use, rather than
on the content of the record itself. This means the record will be classified according to why it
exists i.e., its function rather than what it is about i.e., its subject. Linking records to their
business context is a key requirement for making and capturing full and accurate records.
An analysis of business activity and processes will provide an understanding of the
relationship between an organisations business and its records
It is important to know the extent of a function, to ensure that business responsibilities are
met. Functions consist of component activities, which consist of component transactions.
These are supported by identifiable recordkeeping requirements. The sum of activities,
transactions and recordkeeping requirements provides the framework to ensure a function is
performed accountably
c. Unclassified documents
For the security of the state, many government secrets of the world are documented and then
marked as “classified”. But after many years, security threats fade and what was once
classed as top secret may become “declassified”. Some contain information that now seems
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       179
Learner Manual
mundane or trivial. Others have revealed secrets that have shocked nations to their very
core. We’ve compiled a list of the top 10 declassified documents that rocked the modern
world
d. Access control
Additionally, you will want to protect your research and sales information from rival
companies that may want to steal the information to help them get ahead.
Since you likely store information and documents in a number of ways, you need to have a
strategy in place to protect all of your information.
A solid strategy and following strict guidelines can protect your business
As a business, you have the responsibility to protect the private information of your
customers. You need to protect any credit card information that you collect from your
customers.
If you are a medical office, you need to follow HIPAA law and train your staff to protect the
information.
Although this may not be the first aspect of document management that you think of, it is a
very important aspect of successfully managing your business.
You do need to keep careful records for tax information and to protect yourself when you sign
contracts, but it is just as important that you keep this information secure.
When you operate on a paper system, you need to take careful steps to keep the information
safe and private. You should have a system that allows you to see who is accessing the files
on a regular basis.
The storage area where you keep files on customers should be locked at night. Additionally, it
should be in an area where the public cannot accidentally wander into it.
Although we have given you several tips to help secure your records at your office, you might
want to consider a secure offsite storage solution to help manage your records.
It’s perfect for records that haven’t passed their appropriate retention time but are no longer
useful in your day-to-day activities.
Not only will they be stored in a secure facility, a Records Management Company can give
you access to any of your stored records when you need them.
It is also important for you to protect the information that you store digitally.
As more and more businesses turn to digital records, it can become easier for thieves to hack
into your system and find the information that they need.
One common example is when a business is hacked, and credit card numbers for customers
are stolen.
You need to be sure to use a strong encryption system for all of your digital documents. It is
worth paying extra for this system because it is protecting your business and your business
relationships.
Digital documents and information can also be stolen from thumb drives and laptops- that’s
why it’s critical to encrypt them if you’re travelling.
Another important part of protecting sensitive business documents is learning how to dispose
of them properly. Many states require you to black out all personal information on documents
before you throw them away.
This information includes names, phone numbers, account numbers and social security
numbers. Another option to properly dispose of the document is to shred the documents so
that the information cannot be pieced back together.
If you are disposing of old computers and hard drives, you need to completely erase the hard
drives. You may also consider actually destroying the computer or drives physically if the
information on the drives is of a highly sensitive nature.
e. Physical security
Physical security covers all the devices, technologies and specialist materials for perimeter,
external and internal protection. This covers everything from sensors and closed-circuit
television to barriers, lighting and access controls
For many organizations there are added benefits from implementing IPS. During the risk and
threat assessment phases of developing an IPS, you frequently discover areas of
vulnerability that can be remedied and practices that can be improved. This can lead to
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                      182
Learner Manual
improved productivity and efficiency and has an ongoing impact on your bottom line. So by
implementing an IPS, you might also increase efficiency and profitability.
The biggest benefit, however, is in increased safety for everyone using that facility. It is
essential to effectively communicate the need for IPS to all those concerned and to get them
actively involved in the process. After all, one of the cheapest forms of physical security – and
among the most effective – is the eyes and ears of the people using the facility.
The goal of physical security is to protect facilities and buildings and the assets they contain.
The most important of these assets are, of course, the people who work in and visit the
facility. The first things you need to find out are:
          The assets to be protected
          The threat to those assets
          The vulnerability of those assets
          Your priorities
What Am I Protecting?
Protective systems should always be developed for specific assets. You have to know the
core functions of your facility because that will enable you to identify the specific critical
infrastructure that you need to protect to continue in business in the event of an attack.
The goal of security is to protect facilities and buildings and the assets contained inside.
Various layers of security may be necessary in different parts of the building depending on
the assets located there. For instance, there should be relatively free access to the office
kitchen but restricted access to the computer network control room.
Assets are anything that can be destroyed, damaged or stolen. The risk-analysis procedure is
used to identify assets – everything from the building itself to hazardous materials,
equipment, supplies, furniture, computers and, of course, people.
External threats range from vandalism and break-ins to acts of terrorism. You need to know
your adversaries and the various tactics they might use. You also need to know their
motivations and capabilities. Consult with your local police, the FBI and other agencies that
monitor these threats. They can advise on what threats you face, from whom and what
methods and weapons they might use against them.
          Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) to take into account the
           relationship between the physical environment and the users of that environment. It is
           one of the tried and trusted methodologies available to you and is a useful tool in
           identifying the “bad boys” and what crimes may affect your facility and personnel.
Where Am I Vulnerable?
 Until you discover your areas of vulnerability, you cannot develop the strategies needed to
protect them. A useful way of identifying threats is to conduct scenario-based assessments.
This is very analytical process because you must be able to identify all critical flaws and weak
points in your current physical protection. You have to come up with multiple “what if”
scenarios and work them through. By working through the various scenarios and determining
the probable actions and consequences, you can then develop plans to counter or mitigate
them.
What Are My Priorities? Risk assessment must take into account the effect on your business
or operation if assets are destroyed or damaged. Part of that assessment is to rate the impact
of the loss of those assets on a scale of low, medium or high. This will identify the critical
assets that need maximum protection.
How Do I Compare?
Once you have established the above, you are in a position to do your Gap Analysis to
identify what needs to be done to reduce risk, increase safety and provide the necessary
physical security for your building and people. How do you compare to the model facility,
what are your threats and vulnerabilities? And, having identified these threats and
– Gap Closure Having identified your shortfalls, you must then consider and evaluate all
available options to mitigate the threats. There is a vast array of external and internal systems
and devices available. You must determine which are the best options and combinations for
your particular circumstances. If you have questions, consult an independent security
consultant rather than a vendor with a vested interest in selling you its product.
The options are described in general terms in Step Three and in more detail in Security 101.
1) Perimeter Security Secure perimeter, perimeter surveillance, protection basics, defense
measures, stand-off distances and counter-measures to reduce security risks.
 2) Vehicles Protect approaches, control access and parking, install barriers, surveillance and
other monitoring equipment.
3) Internal Security Access controls, alarms and barriers, authentication devices and
screening, access biometrics, closed-circuit television (CCTV), hot site protection, safe mail
rooms, coping with hazards.
4)    Information          Technology      Integrate     IT   and   physical   security     planning,     provide
network/infrastructure protection and protect files, document and other critical resources. 5)
People
                            i. Security staff – needs/hiring/training, security programs and responses.
                            ii. Staff/visitors   –     screening/training/informing;      drills/evacuation/safe
                                  rooms; alarms/staging areas; communications and coping with and
                                  recovering from an event.
                           iii. Special needs – Americans with Disabilities Act requirements and
                                  special resources.
6) Building Design/Security Building Code laws; exits/fences/gates/doors/barriers/windows;
critical floor space/safe rooms/safe areas; devices/detectors; lighting; cameras; and
maintenance
7) Community Risk Assessment/Community Involvement Assess local risks and incorporate
into planning; work with fire/police/EMS; work with local businesses and the community.
8) Technology Solutions The handbook deals with the various security and defence devices
available to you. These are referred to in Security 101 and the Gap Analysis and Gap Closure
chapters, but not in as much technical detail as you may wish. References are provided
throughout the book to allow you to get more comprehensive information should you need it.
– Strategic Plan Having identified assets, adversaries, threats, vulnerabilities and determined
priorities and options, you are in a position to plan and strategize the security change
The strategic plan sets out Steps Two and Three above – documenting your gap analysis,
identifying critical assets, threats and weaknesses and all areas needing to be addressed.
The gap closure documents how you plan to close those gaps, the justification for the actions
to be taken, costs involved and timeframe for implementation.
The strategic plan serves two critical functions: It is the marketing tool you need to get
management approval and it is the blueprint for your physical security plan.
– Implementation Once your strategic plan has been approved, it must be implemented. This
includes project management, bid contracting and vendor selection, quality assurance and
quality control, and revising policy procedures.
Integrated physical security planning is also an ongoing requirement. Once your system is in
place you must continuously test it for weaknesses and vulnerabilities. You must ensure your
employees understand the measures in place and what they must do in the event of an
emergency.
Re-analyse your current situation. Ask yourself what has changed and what new threats have
emerged. By constantly tracking and monitoring your integrated physical security system you
can close any gaps and introduce enhancements.
 IAC0501
 Given a range of Occupational health and Safety media, reports and documents. Be able
 to: a. Classify the documents regarding the need for security and retention; b. Identify
 deficiencies in the document control systems used; c. Indicate appropriate actions to
KT0505 DESCRIBE THE CRITERIA FOR THE QUALITY OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY DOCUMENTATION
The most effective strategy for managing health and safety in the health services and for
providing health care is to incorporate occupational health and safety into an institution’s
managerial objectives. Handling health and safety objectives in the same way that objectives
dealing with finances, the services, or quality are handled will help attain a high-performance
standard in health and safety.
It is management’s responsibility to ensure that the health care facility under its responsibility
establishes adequate policies and programs supplied with sufficient human and financial
resources to provide a healthy and safe workplace.
The extent to which employee activities are channelled toward a common goal depends on
the extent of the administration’s commitment and participation. In addition to directed
activities carried out by the director or by persons specifically assigned to the health care
facility’s occupational health and safety management system, other top-management actions
(in various areas) will demonstrate the support of the leaders to the management of
occupational health and safety. For example:
          conduct regular worksite visits to communicate with workers and identify deficiencies
           to be resolved;
          promote and participate in regular meetings specifically held to discuss safety and
           health issues or introduce the discussion of these issues in regular daily meetings;
          observe if and how workers adopt work routines that could have serious
           consequences and set up a dialogue to discuss alternative ways of performing work;
          show an interest in the causes of occupational accidents and in how they have been
           taken care of. After an accident, assure workers that management cares for them,
           especially while victims are recovering;
          serve as an example by using personal protective equipment in work areas that
           require it and always respect existing prevention standards;
          adopt a participatory leadership and heed the opinions of the members of the
           organization as a way to establish the necessary confidence;
          establish and foster an organizational structure that supports activities of the risk
           prevention and risk control programs; and
          secure the necessary financial and human resources to ensure that the occupational
           health and safety system functions well.
develop, apply, and periodically monitor and evaluate the occupational health and safety
management system;
           periodically report on the operation of the occupational health and safety management
            system to the highest management level; and
           promote the participation of all members of the organization
           conduct regular worksite visits to communicate with workers and identify deficiencies
            to be resolved;
           promote and participate in regular meetings specifically held to discuss safety and
            health issues or introduce the discussion of these issues in regular daily meetings;
           observe if and how workers adopt work routines that could have serious
            consequences and set up a dialogue to discuss alternative ways of performing work;
           show an interest in the causes of occupational accidents and in how they have been
            taken care of. After an accident, assure workers that management cares for them,
            especially while victims are recovering;
           adopt a participatory leadership and heed the opinions of the members of the
            organization as a way to establish the necessary confidence;
           establish and foster an organizational structure that supports activities of the risk
            prevention and risk control programs; and
           secure the necessary financial and human resources to ensure that the occupational
            health and safety system functions well.
Some Requirements for the Proper Functioning of the Occupational Health and Safety
Unit
  •       The Occupational Health and Safety Unit must have adequate space to carry out its
          activities and so its staff can perform its administrative functions.
  •       The professional independence of the Unit’s members must be safeguarded in
          accordance with national laws and with standards agreed upon between management
          and workers.
  •       The Unit’s professionals must adhere to confidentiality standards concerning information
          they receive on employees while performing their functions. Professional confidentiality
          is subject to exceptions defined in the legislation and in national regulations.
The Committee is charged with issuing recommendations to solve occupational health and
safety problems but is not responsible for implementing those recommendations. The
ultimate responsibility for guaranteeing worker safety rests with the employer; in other words,
the management or administration of the health care facility. The Committee may collaborate
in implementing the recommendations, provided that management has established
favourable conditions for the collaboration to occur (clear delegation of responsibilities,
training, support personnel, etc.).
   On completion of this section you will be able to understand concepts and principles of
   cause and effect analysis and how this applies to occupational hazard identification and
   risk assessment and incident and accident investigation.
   1. KT0601 Define what is meant by cause and effect and give examples of how this
         applies to hazard identification, risk assessment and accident/incident investigation.
   2. KT0602 Explain how a cause and effect analysis works and how it applies to risk
         assessment, hazard identification and incident/accident investigation.
   3. KT0603 Explain what is meant by preventative, corrective and contingency actions and
         give examples of how this is applied in hazard identification, risk assessment and
         accident/incident investigations. a. Cover pre-contact, contact and post contact controls.
KT0601 DEFINE WHAT IS MEANT BY CAUSE AND EFFECT AND GIVE EXAMPLES OF HOW THIS APPLIES TO HAZARD
Risk factors need to be stated clearly and concisely to support effective management of risk.
Summarising risk identification and analysis in a statement is not a science and there is no
specific formula to get it right; The key to writing a good risk statement is having a
foundational understanding of risk components and their interrelationships. Understanding
key risk-related terms and their definitions, as well as the business and its objectives, will
result in more impactful risk articulation.
When two or more events occur in a way that one event is the result of another, they have a
cause-and-effect relationship
To illustrate the application of these definitions in practice, one can consider a fictional bank
with an objective to “keep confidential customer information secure” that is implementing a
change to a highly complex customer account management system that handles customer
information
            The consequence ideally needs to be quantified using industry research data, internal
           management information or known cause-and-effect relationships, such as known
           fixed fines levied by regulators or known customer impacts for instances of customer
           data leakage. A good example of this is the maximum fine of UK £500,000 that can be
           levied by the UK Information Commissioner’s Office for confidential customer data
           leakage incidents or alternatively customer churn of 6.4 percent derived from industry
           research reports.
in [consequence/s].
The latter version is better to use if the risk statement sentence would be too long and needs
to be broken up to improve clarity. This might happen, for example, if there are a large
number of key risk causes.
Taking the previous example to illustrate this, if the bank’s objective is to “keep confidential
customer information secure” and the event is customer data leakage, corruption or
unavailability caused by defective system changes, the risk statement could be:
Data leakage, corruption and unavailability are information security failure events. That is,
keeping information secure (the objective) has deviated from (the effect). The unauthorised,
defective or unfit changes are the causes of this effect on objectives, while the consequences
are defined in terms of what happens if the organisation fails to meet its objective.
IAC0601 Given descriptions of various accidents and incidents in different industries and work
environments. Be able to:
a. Indicate how these situations explain the concept of cause and effect[8]
b. Describe how a cause and effect analysis should be done in each of the given situations; [5]
c. Through examples explain each step in a typical cause and effect process. [10]
Business process improvements, the grail of any company’s operations, translate directly into
better profits by cutting costs and increasing competitiveness at the same time. In many
cases, business process improvements have accelerating cumulative effects on company
profits. If an insurance company, for example, can underwrite policies faster or settle claims
faster, it is providing better service and can do it at a lower cost; thus, competing better with
nimbler, smaller online competitors.
Unfortunately, any company has a limited amount of money to spend on business process
improvement, and that budget has to compete with many other priorities. If those in charge of
operations had the choice, they would put in new hardware and software, hire better qualified
people, provide them more training, and have a better work environment. However, practical
considerations force every company to pick and choose how much to spend on which
priorities. The question is – what are the right priorities? How does a company know that the
training course on people skills will actually make a difference in customer satisfaction? How
does the company know that the expensive CRM (customer relationship management)
system it is considering is going to make any difference? How does it know which one to do
first?
This is where cause-and-effect analysis, combined with careful design of experiments (DOE),
can provide a Six Sigma company with the data to make the most cost-effective decisions.
Many companies perform design of experiments without realizing it. For example, before
deciding whether to acquire a new CRM software application, a company may have a small
group of customer service agents try it out first. Or a company may decide to send a small
group of agents to a new training course to test whether the training makes any difference in
the quality of service they provide. A combination of cause-and-effect analysis and DOE is a
formal and more scientific approach to doing the same things a company may have been
doing informally.
A DOE is a structured, organized method for determining the relationship between factors
affecting a process and the output of that process. The output of the process is the
dependent variable that depends upon the independent variables to determine its outcome.
Cause-and-effect Analysis
A customer service business process is a good example. The company is trying to track
down the causes for poor customer service and fix them. A simple cause-and-effect analysis
could look something like Figure 1.
Here, the root causes that determine how good or how bad the end product of customer
service might be are hypothesized and sorted into a standard 3M&P model:
Methods: Methods are the processes and procedures used by customer service to deliver its
services. These could be:
          Call workflow – Poor customer service, real or perceived by the customer, could be an
           artifact of how call workflow is implemented within the organization. How annoying is it
           to wait on hold or be passed from person to person when calling for customer
           service?
          Call assignment – How are calls assigned? Does the customer reach the right person
           who can solve the problem, the very first time?
          Call escalation – If the first customer service person cannot solve the problem, who
           does the customer talk to next? Does that help?
Materials: In the context of customer service, these are the policies, work environment,
incentive and reward structures set up within the company for the customer service agents:
Machine: In the context of customer service, these are the tools available to the agents to do
their jobs:
          CRM application – These days, most customer service agents use a customer
           relationship management system to keep track of all customer interactions. How good
           customer service is depending upon how well the CRM system is set up and fulfills
           the precise needs of the agents when providing service.
          Problem knowledge base – Many organizations use a problem knowledge base to see
           if the same problem has been solved for another customer.
People: For customer service to be good, the agents must have certain skills:
           investing in a new CRM system? This is where DOE provides a way of measuring the
           relative efficacies of one cause over another.
Design of Experiments
The Pareto principle (the 80/20 rule) applies to customer service as much as to any other
process within a company. Thus, 80 percent of the improvement in customer service is likely
to come from 20 percent of the causes above. The question is, which 20 percent?
To address this question with an example DOE exercise, consider the quality of customer
service provided as the dependent variable and the factors identified in the cause-and-effect
analysis as the independent variables. The experiments which could be done include the
following:
using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to see how related quality of customer service is to any
of the above factors. One-way ANOVA relates one of the independent variables to the
dependent variable – in this case, quality of customer service. Sometimes in practice, the
combination of two factors is really worth more than just the two factors added up together.
For example, experienced customer service managers know that good problem-solving skills,
combined with a powerful knowledge base, can improve the quality of service dramatically.
Two-way ANOVA can help consider two factors together and analyze their effects on the
quality of service on the whole, with proof obtained from data collected when processes are
executed.
The key in the above analyses is collection of data. When collecting process execution data,
it is just a simple additional step to collect data that has details such as the agent, years of
experience, skill levels, which CRM system was used (older or the newer one being
considered), etc. When process execution data is collected this way, doing DOE becomes
just extracting subsets of data already in hand and analyzing them.
HOW THIS IS APPLIED IN HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT AND ACCIDENT/INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS.
Root Cause Corrective Action for non-conformances has long been a requirement for those
working in industries with critical processes. It is a process of determining the causes that led
to a nonconformance or event and implementing corrective actions to prevent a recurrence of
the event. Submitting full and complete responses will aid in acceptance of your responses,
shorten the cycle time for accreditation/approval, and provide you with a powerful continual
improvement tool.
Definition: Corrective Action “Corrective action” action to eliminate the cause of a detected
non-conformity or other undesirable situation.
           1. There can be more than one cause for a nonconformity.
           2. Corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence.
           3. There is a difference between correction and corrective action.
Corrective Action
Corrective action requests are the usual system companies use to fix problems when they
are found, whether they are discovered on the production line or by a customer. The goal is
to eliminate defective product and to take appropriate action to prevent the same problem
from recurring.
Most companies with quality management systems are pretty good with corrective action.
They have a system in place that tracks corrective actions needed, who is in charge of them,
and the deadline for action, and documents to track all of this. They have a system for doing
root cause analysis in place to get to the bottom of problems and truly solve them rather than
doing corrections on an ongoing basis.
Root cause analysis is what separates corrective actions from corrections (rework, refunds to
a dissatisfied customer, etc). Auditors will say that if your identified root cause is that an
employee needs more training, you probably haven’t found the root of the problem. Why
didn’t they have the training? What procedure or lay-out needs to be changed to prevent that
problem from occurring again? Done well, root cause analysis prevents more of the same
problems from recurring in the future, improving quality. One place companies can have
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                                  203
Learner Manual
trouble with corrective action is in verification of effectiveness. A corrective action doesn’t
actually correct the problem unless it is effective, and there is no way to know this without
checking on it later, usually 1-4 months after the change is implemented. A problem corrected
on the spot is not a closed corrective action because there is no time to verify effectiveness.
Preventive Action
Corrective action is easy in some ways because it is a reaction to a known problem.
Preventive action is harder because there isn’t a problem yet. Preventive action is hunting
down the problems before they occur, before anyone notices. It isn’t finding a method for
catch out of tolerance errors during final inspection, it is a procedure for checking machine
tolerances during production and catching them before they are out of spec.
Preventive action is related to risk analysis. It is asking, what could go wrong? And how do
we prevent it? Preventive actions can come from analysing data or from line worker
suggestions. Customer comments that aren’t really complaints are another useful source of
information. Analyse warranty data and look for trends. Analyse root causes of
nonconformances and look for trends. Do customer complaints seem to cluster around some
underlying issue? If so, then preventive action can be used to address the problem.
PRE-CONTACT METHOD
Elimination
Elimination of a specific hazard or hazardous work process, or preventing it from entering the
workplace, is the most effective method of control.
It is important to consider worker health and safety when work processes are still in the
planning stages. For example, when purchasing machines, safety should be the first concern,
not cost. Machines should conform to national safety standards — they should be designed
with the correct guard on them to eliminate the danger of a worker getting caught in the
machine while using it. Machines that are not produced with the proper guards on them may
cost less to purchase, but cost more in terms of accidents, loss of production, compensation,
etc. Unfortunately, many used machines that do not meet safety standards are exported to
developing countries, causing workers to pay the price with accidents, hearing loss from
noise, etc.
Once the need for preventive action has been decided on, and the benefit is analysed to be
sure it is worth the effort and cost of making the fix, the actions can go through the same kind
of system (frequently the same system) as corrective actions, including a review of the
effectiveness of the actions. Both corrective actions and preventive actions may require an
iterated process to finally resolve the problems.
Corrective action is usually more urgent for companies and is a good place to start. But
ignoring the potential for improvements driven by preventive action keeps a company from
having the highest quality it can achieve.
    Employ process and system analysis to determine how to build in safeguards and process
     changes to prevent nonconformance. For example, use a failure mode and effects
     analysis to identify risks and potential deficiencies and to set priorities for improvement.
    Contain a related series of actions, often separated by long periods so you can wait and
     see progress and results.
    Establish a means for communicating what has been done and what has to be done to
     facilitate communication about changes to project team members.
    Include a clear trail of actions taken and decisions made to substantiate the decision to
     proceed, document lessons learned and avoid needless reinvention on future similar
     projects.
Documenting and controlling corrective and preventive actions ensure appropriate action is
taken within a reasonable timeframe and the resulting changes work.
The response submitted must demonstrate compliance with each of these requirements.
Following the process described herein and documenting these steps will allow you to
demonstrate this compliance. All of these requirements are met within a corrective action
process that addresses:
          Containment
          Problem definition
          Analysis
          Solution
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                             206
Learner Manual
          Assessment
The process described here is “a” process for identifying the information required by industry
managed accreditation programs as well as meeting corrective action requirements. The
steps described here encompass essential elements of any corrective action system but may
be accomplished with different tools or called by different names. For our purposes we will
use the term “event” to mean any of the following: audit finding, product failure, customer
complaint, customer return, scrap, rework, SPC special cause, accident, etc. Whatever
process you use, whatever terms you use, make certain you understand how and where your
responses fit into the submittal requirements.
Containment Action
Containment action is the first step in this process. These are the actions taken immediately
after you become aware of the event to stop the event from occurring and preventing or
minimizing any impact from the event. You contain the problem and the effects prior to
beginning corrective action. While these actions may be called specific corrective action,
please note that there are no actions here to correct the problem, they are just damage
control:
          Put out the fire: This step is where you stop the event from occurring.
          Assess the damage: Once you have stopped the event from occurring, determine
           what and how much damage has been done.
          Contain all effects: Upon determination of the amount and extent of damage, prevent
           everything that was affected from escaping, and determine if anything has escaped.
          Notify as appropriate: If it is determined that product may have escaped, notify any
           impacted customers.
These steps are the actions taken to bring the noncompliance into compliance. This is the
immediate corrective action constituting the information to be supplied in the Immediate
Corrective Action. Each of these steps should be described in detail. Advise exactly what
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                      207
Learner Manual
steps you took to stop the event from occurring, what was the impact and how you
determined this. Describe in detail the steps you took to contain any effects (while we are
critically concerned with hardware, effects may go beyond product). If product has, or may
have, been shipped to a customer, advise who and how you notified customers.
Problem Definition
Corrective action begins with clearly defining the actual problem. While this may seem
simple, many repetitive non-conformances result because the wrong problem was solved,
only the outcome was fixed, or only one problem was corrected when there were really two or
more problems. The steps involved in problem definition are:
          Forming the team
          Identifying the problem
          Gathering and verifying data
Forming the Team Assigning the wrong personnel to corrective action projects is a common
problem. Many times, the projects are assigned to Quality, when Quality did not make the
error, or it may be assigned to employees in charge of the area where the problem or
noncompliance was discovered when the noncompliance resulted from a systemic problem
that goes far beyond the area where the noncompliance was discovered. A team of
stakeholders in the problem should be assembled. Who owns the problem?
Who has a stake in the outcome and the solution to the problem? Who are the vested owners
of both the problem and the solution? These are the people who know the process, have the
data and experience, and they are the ones will have to implement the corrective actions.
Without the full support of the stakeholders, long-term solutions are not likely. Once the
stakeholders are identified, consider if additional expertise is needed.
If so, the team may need to include qualified team members or ad-hoc members who, while
not stakeholders, can contribute information, technical expertise, management support, or
offer advice. Please note that the stakeholders and qualified members may change as the
team gains more information and data. Clarifying the problem or additional problems may
surface involving additional stakeholders or require additional expertise. As the process
evolves, continue to assure that your team includes stakeholders and necessary experts and
resources.
In order to fix a problem, it must be clearly and appropriately defined. Frequently, the
nonconformance identified is not really the problem, but the symptom of the problem. If you
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                 208
Learner Manual
have an expired gage, that is a symptom of a problem with your recall system. A flow-down
problem is generally a contract review or quality planning issue. Asking questions similar to
the following will help you to address the actual problem and not just the symptom that was
identified as the event.
          What is the scope of the problem?
          How many problems is it?
          What is affected by the problem?
          What is the impact on the company?
          How often does the problem occur?
Addressing these types of questions will assist you in clarifying and defining the problem(s).
“If you cannot say it simply, you do not understand the problem.”
 Once the problem is defined, it must be clearly stated in simple terms. While some problems
might be “the unique, inherent metallurgical properties”, you aren’t going to be able to fix that,
but certainly there is some process variability that contributed to this and can be fixed. Do not
allow yourself to hide behind the technical, state-of-the-art nature of industries with critical
processes. Very few of our problems are actually technical or high-tech. When the problem is
known, the event question to be answered can be formed. This event question begins the “5-
Why” process.
Initial data gathering starts at the scene. Data has a shelf life, the longer you wait the more
difficult it becomes to obtain good information. When possible, go to the scene and take note
of who was present, what is in place, when the event occurred and where the event
happened. If the event is in the form of an audit finding, try to recover as much of the scene
as possible.
Once gathered, verify the accuracy of the data. Cause analysis is performed based on fact.
Remember, if you don’t look, you will not find the problem. Make sure that gathered data is
correct and complete. Then go where the data takes you. Do not take the data where you
want it to go
Analysis
When the problem is identified, and preliminary data has been gathered and verified, the
analysis can begin. We will describe a “5-Why” process, but analysis may take other forms.
This process uses the Why – Why – etc. method to build a cause chain because it is a
natural, logical progression for thinking through a problem. The 5-Why process is called that
because, generally speaking, it takes 5 “whys” to get to the logical end of the cause chain.
Not all because chains will be complete in 5 whys, some will take 7 and others will reach their
end in 3.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          210
Learner Manual
Example of Why-
Why Method of Questioning
The Event: I didn’t get to work on time.
The answers to the “Why” questions form a chain of causes leading to the root cause. The
answer to the first Why is the direct cause. The logical end of each chain is a root cause
(each chain will have its own root) and the causes in between the direct cause and the root
cause are contributing causes. There may be no contributing causes, but there is always a
root cause – the best and logical place to stop as identified by the team. This place is where
continuing to ask Why adds no value to prevention of recurrence, variability reduction, or cost
savings.
Some formal method of prioritizing causes will need to be developed to aid in determining
when an identified cause should be worked, as a large number of causes will be generated
and not all are worthy of much investment to fix. The figure below demonstrates a complete
5-why analysis with grayed out boxes being either causes not supported by data or causes
not to be fixed by some formal prioritization method.
Using the 5-Why approach provides a structured approach to corrective action and can form
the basis for a broad-based continual improvement and preventive action plan. This formal
process should capture and prioritize causes and address them as the basis for continual
improvement efforts. The issues identified through this process are obstacles within the
organization that are costing time, money, and frustration. This cause identification process,
coupled with a structured prioritization process will also satisfy the requirements for:
The root cause of the chain with the highest priority should be identified as the Root Cause in
the format required. The contributing causes between the root cause and the direct cause
may be included to clarify your analysis process.
Impact
You should now re-examine your impact statement. While the impact and effects of the event
were addressed as part of your immediate corrective (or containment action), you have now
identified numerous causes that may also have impacted your products or processes.
Consider the effects that the entire cause chain has had and be certain that they get
addressed. If necessary, readdress the Impact statement. Be certain that this statement
addresses:
Solution
It is now time to begin problem solving, and if you have built a good cause chain, you know
what needs to be fixed. Some of the problems have been fixed as part of containment, but
now it is time for root cause preventive action. Preventive Corrective Action can also be
thought of as Sustaining, as you cannot prevent the event at this juncture, it has already
happened. Actions taken now are to prevent recurrence of the event. They focus on breaking
the cause chain completely by fixing the contributing causes and the root cause.
A contributing cause, if not addressed, could be a future root cause. Preventive Action is a
series of actions that positively change or modify system performance. It focuses on the
systemic change and the places in the process where the potential for failure exists.
Preventive Action does not focus on individual mistakes or personnel shortcomings.
Assessment
The assessment portion of the corrective action process includes both:
          Follow-Up: A review done by a team member to ensure all corrective actions are
           implemented as stated.
          Assessment: An independent review to determine if the corrective actions have been
           effective in preventing recurrence.
Follow-Up
Corrective actions must be accomplished as stated and someone is responsible to assure
that the actions were implemented. When verifying implementation, it is important to take
things literally. Was everything accomplished as you stated in the report? Were the tasks
accomplished according to the established timeline? Do not commit to actions that the team
cannot deliver. Be careful in use of terms, such as everyone or all. Remember, you have to
show you have done what you said you would do and be able to show objective evidence.
Assessment
Once the action has been implemented, you are required to determine that the actions taken
were effective. In order to determine effectiveness, you must define the criteria by which you
measure effectiveness and what is acceptable. Assessing effectiveness of actions taken will
be a significant step in reducing non-sustaining corrective actions.
Contingency Planning
Contingency planning is the act of preparing a plan, or a series of activities, should an
adverse risk occur. Having a contingency plan in place forces the project team to think in
advance as to a course of action if a risk event takes place.
          Identify the contingency plan tasks (or steps) that can be performed to implement the
           mitigation strategy.
          Identify the necessary resources such as money, equipment and labour.
          Develop a contingency plan schedule. Since the date the plan will be implemented is
           unknown, this schedule will be in the format of day 1, day 2, day 3, etc., rather than
           containing specific start and end dates.
          Define emergency notification and escalation procedures, if appropriate. • Develop
           contingency plan training materials, if appropriate.
          Review and update contingency plans if necessary.
          Publish the plan(s) and distribute the plan(s) to management and those directly
           involved in executing the plan(s).
Contingency may also be reflected in the project budget, as a line item to cover unexpected
expenses. The amount to budget for contingency may be limited to just the high probability
risks. This is normally determined by estimating the cost if a risk occurs and multiplying it by
the probability. For example, assume a risk is estimated to result in an additional cost of
R50,000, and the probability of occurring is 80%. The amount that should be included in the
budget for this one item is R40,000.
 Associated with a contingency plan, are start triggers and stop triggers. A start trigger is an
event that would activate the contingency plan, while a stop trigger is the criteria to resume
normal operations. Both should be identified in the Risk Register and can be embedded,
example; the stop trigger can be included in the contingency plan field.
Contingency plans that once approved and initiated will be added to the project work plan and
be tracked and reported along with all of the other project activities. Risk management is an
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       215
Learner Manual
ongoing activity that will continue throughout the life of the project. This process includes
continued activities of risk identification, risk assessment, planning for newly identified risks,
monitoring trigger conditions and contingency plans, and risk reporting on a regular basis.
Project status reporting contains a section on risk management, where new risks are
presented along with any status changes of existing risks. Some risk attributes, such as
probability and impact, could change during the life of a project and this should be reported
as well.
   On completion of this section you will be able to understand principles, concepts and
   processes of hazard identification, risk assessment and control.
    KT0701 Describe the process of hazard identification and risk assessment giving practical
    a. Steps for identifying hazards; b. Different processes of classifying hazards; c. Typical
    process for identifying the related risks; d. Methods of classifying and describing significant
    risks; e. Scope (stakeholders, techniques and area); f. Various process steps for conducting
    the assessment g. Implementation steps; h. Monitoring and reporting process. KT0702
    Explain the difference and interrelationship between hazards and risks: a. Definition of a
    Hazard; b. Definition of a Risk; c. The cause and effect relationship between hazards and
    risks; KT0703 Describe what is meant by controls and give examples of controls to prevent
    hazards from causing incidents as well as controls to mitigate the consequences when a
    hazard does cause an accident/incident. Explain the hierarchy of control of hazards and
    risks: a. Description as per the Health and safety regulations KT0704 Explain the legal
    requirements regarding hazard identification and risk assessment. Describe the various
    sources of hazards
   On completion of this section you will be able to understand concepts, principles and
   leading practices associated with continuous improvement
CYCLE
Although many quality improvement issues involve complex systems that impact numerous
processes, functions, and departments within an organization, managers must also
implement quality improvements at a much smaller scale within their work units. There are
numerous issues involving work flow, customer service, communication, data management,
and other matters that are solely within your team’s purview that can make a big difference in
enhancing the functioning of your team.
One tool you can use to implement continuous improvement in your team is the plan-do-
check-act model, also called the Deming Cycle or the Shewhart Cycle. This model is
described as:
          Plan: Identify an opportunity and plan for change.
          Do: Implement the change on a small scale.
          Check: Use data to analyze the results of the change and determine whether it made
           a difference.
          Act: If the change was successful, implement it on a wider scale and continuously
           assess the results. If unsuccessful, begin the cycle again.
To engage in a continuous improvement effort with your team, consider these basic steps:
      1. Assemble the team to identify a specific process issue requiring improvement.
      2. Engage in processes to identify root causes of the problem. Many of the tools listed
            in this chapter may assist you to do this.
      3. Chart the current process used. Typically, some form of flowcharting will assist you to
            do this. The most commonly used symbols in flowcharting are as follows:
     a) To illustrate the basic flowchart process, the diagram that follows provides a rather
           exaggerated process that a short-order cook at a delicatessen might go through to
           prepare an order for a pastrami sandwich on rye with potato chips to go. Though
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                             219
Learner Manual
           flowcharting systems in your work are undoubtedly more complex than this, this
           example illustrates the many seemingly simple steps that must be accounted for when
           flowcharting. You must be careful to chart each step-in order to identify whether each
           step is necessary or if some steps are redundant or otherwise unnecessary.
      4. Chart the ideal process that the team envisions will improve the process. Typically,
            when compared to the current process, this will reveal the opportunity to eliminate
            steps that are redundant, time-consuming, or inefficient in other ways.
      5. Agree on the ideal model and identify the barriers and bottlenecks that may prevent
            its implementation and discuss how to address them. Are there arbitrary policies,
            practices,and procedures that need to be corrected? Are there others outside the
            team who have some control or ownership over the current process with whom the
            team must negotiate? Are there impacts upstream or downstream that must also be
            addressed in order to realize this new model?
      6. Determine who will address the barriers and bottlenecks identified, the timeline and
            deadlines for addressing them, and then proceed to address them.
      7. Implement the change. Determine how you will measure the effectiveness of the
            change and evaluate the new process accordingly.
A manager’s primary challenge is to solve problems creatively. While drawing from a variety
of academic disciplines, and to help managers respond to the challenge of creative problem
solving, principles of management have long been categorized into the four major functions of
planning, organizing, leading, and controlling (the P-O-L-C framework). The four functions,
summarized in the P-O-L-C figure, are actually highly integrated when carried out in the day-
to-day realities of running an organization. Therefore, you should not get caught up in trying
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                            220
    Learner Manual
    to analyze and understand a complete, clear rationale for categorizing skills and practices
    that compose the whole of the P-O-L-C framework.
    It is important to note that this framework is not without criticism. Specifically, these criticisms
    stem from the observation that the P-O-L-C functions might be ideal but that they do not
    accurately depict the day-to-day actions of actual managers. The typical day in the life of a
    manager at any level can be fragmented and hectic, with the constant threat of having
    priorities dictated by the law of the trivial many and important few (i.e., the 80/20 rule).
    However, the general conclusion seems to be that the P-O-L-C functions of management still
    provide a very useful way of classifying the activities managers engage in as they attempt to
    achieve organizational goals.
Planning
    Planning is the function of management that involves setting objectives and determining a
    course of action for achieving those objectives. Planning requires that managers be aware of
    environmental conditions facing their organization and forecast future conditions. It also
    requires that managers be good decision makers.
    Planning is a process consisting of several steps. The process begins with environmental
    scanning which simply means that planners must be aware of the critical contingencies facing
    their organization in terms of economic conditions, their competitors, and their customers.
    Planners must then attempt to forecast future conditions. These forecasts form the basis for
    planning.
    Planners must establish objectives, which are statements of what needs to be achieved and
    when. Planners must then identify alternative courses of action for achieving objectives. After
evaluating the various alternatives, planners must make decisions about the best courses of
action for achieving objectives. They must then formulate necessary steps and ensure
effective implementation of plans. Finally, planners must constantly evaluate the success of
their plans and take corrective action when necessary.
Strategic planning involves analyzing competitive opportunities and threats, as well as the
strengths and weaknesses of the organization, and then determining how to position the
organization to compete effectively in their environment. Strategic planning has a long-time
frame, often three years or more. Strategic planning generally includes the entire organization
and includes formulation of objectives. Strategic planning is often based on the organization’s
mission, which is its fundamental reason for existence. An organization’s top management
most often conducts strategic planning.
Organizing
Organizing is the function of management that involves developing an organizational
structure and allocating human resources to ensure the accomplishment of objectives. The
structure of the organization is the framework within which effort is coordinated. The structure
is usually represented by an organization chart, which provides a graphic representation of
the chain of command within an organization. Decisions made about the structure of an
organization are generally referred to as organizational design decisions.
Organizing also involves the design of individual jobs within the organization. Decisions must
be made about the duties and responsibilities of individual jobs, as well as the manner in
which the duties should be carried out. Decisions made about the nature of jobs within the
organization are generally called “job design” decisions.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                      222
Learner Manual
Organizing at the level of the organization involves deciding how best to departmentalize, or
cluster, jobs into departments to coordinate effort effectively. There are many different ways
to departmentalize, including organizing by function, product, geography, or customer. Many
larger organizations use multiple methods of departmentalization.
Organizing at the level of a particular job involves how best to design individual jobs to most
effectively use human resources. Traditionally, job design was based on principles of division
of labor and specialization, which assumed that the more narrow the job content, the more
proficient the individual performing the job could become. However, experience has shown
that it is possible for jobs to become too narrow and specialized. For example, how would you
like to screw lids on jars one day after another, as you might have done many decades ago if
you worked in company that made and sold jellies and jams? When this happens, negative
outcomes result, including decreased job satisfaction and organizational commitment,
increased absenteeism, and turnover.
Recently, many organizations have attempted to strike a balance between the need for
worker specialization and the need for workers to have jobs that entail variety and autonomy.
Many jobs are now designed based on such principles as empowerment, job enrichment and
teamwork. For example, HUI Manufacturing, a custom sheet metal fabricator, has done away
with traditional “departments” to focus on listening and responding to customer needs.
Leading
Leading involves the social and informal sources of influence that you use to inspire action
taken by others. If managers are effective leaders, their subordinates will be enthusiastic
about exerting effort to attain organizational objectives.
The behavioral sciences have made many contributions to understanding this function of
management. Personality research and studies of job attitudes provide important information
as to how managers can most effectively lead subordinates. For example, this research tells
us that to become effective at leading, managers must first understand their subordinates’
personalities, values, attitudes, and emotions.
Studies of motivation and motivation theory provide important information about the ways in
which workers can be energized to put forth productive effort. Studies of communication
provide direction as to how managers can effectively and persuasively communicate. Studies
of leadership and leadership style provide information regarding questions, such as, “What
makes a manager a good leader?” and “In what situations are certain leadership styles most
appropriate and effective?”
Controlling
Controlling involves ensuring that performance does not deviate from standards. Controlling
consists of three steps, which include
(3) taking corrective action when necessary. Performance standards are often stated in
monetary terms such as revenue, costs, or profits but may also be stated in other terms, such
as units produced, number of defective products, or levels of quality or customer service.
The managerial function of controlling should not be confused with control in the behavioral or
manipulative sense. This function does not imply that managers should attempt to control or
to manipulate the personalities, values, attitudes, or emotions of their subordinates. Instead,
this function of management concerns the manager’s role in taking necessary actions to
ensure that the work-related activities of subordinates are consistent with and contributing
toward the accomplishment of organizational and departmental objectives.
Effective controlling requires the existence of plans, since planning provides the necessary
performance standards or objectives. Controlling also requires a clear understanding of
where responsibility for deviations from standards lies. Two traditional control techniques are
budget and performance audits.
processes, procedures for delivery of services, compliance with company policies, and many
other activities within the organization.
The management functions of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling are widely
considered to be the best means of describing the manager’s job, as well as the best way to
classify accumulated knowledge about the study of management. Although there have been
tremendous changes in the environment faced by managers and the tools used by managers
to perform their roles, managers still perform these essential functions.
The basic control process, wherever it is found and whatever it is found and whatever it
controls, involves three steps:
                 (1) establishing standards.
                 (2) measuring performance against these standards. and
                 (3) correcting deviations from standards and plans
If all personnel always did what was best for the organization, control — and even
management — would not be needed. But, obviously individuals are sometimes unable or
unwilling to act in the organization's best interest, and a set of controls must be implemented
to guard against undesirable behavior and to encourage desirable actions.
One important class of problems against which control systems guard may be called personal
limitations. People do not always understand what is expected of them nor how they can best
perform their jobs, as they may lack some requisite ability, training, or information. In addition,
human beings have a number of innate perceptual and cognitive biases, such as an inability
to process new information optimally or to make consistent decisions, and these biases can
reduce organizational effectiveness.4 Some of these personal limitations are correctable or
avoidable, but for others, controls are required to guard against their deleterious effects.
Even if employees are properly equipped to perform a job well, some choose not to do so,
because individual goals and organizational goals may not coincide perfectly. In other words,
there is a lack of goal congruence. Steps must often be taken either to increase goal
congruence or to prevent employees from acting in their own interest where goal
incongruence exists.
If nothing is done to protect the organization against the possible occurrence of undesirable
behavior or the omission of desirable behavior caused by these personal limitations and
motivational problems, severe repercussions may result. At a minimum, inadequate control
can result in lower performance or higher risk of poor performance. At the extreme, if
performance is not controlled on one or more critical performance dimensions, the outcome
could be organizational failure.
Perfect control, meaning complete assurance that actual accomplishment will proceed
according to plan, is never possible because of the likely occurrence of unforeseen events.
However, good control should mean that an informed person could be reasonably confident
that no major unpleasant surprises will occur. A high probability of forthcoming poor
Some important characteristics of this desirable state of good control should be highlighted.
First, control is future-oriented: the goal is to have no unpleasant surprises in the future. The
past is not relevant except as a guide to the future,
Second, control is multidimensional, and good control cannot be established over an activity
with multiple objectives unless performance on all significant dimensions has been
considered. Thus, for example, control of a production department cannot be considered
good unless all the major performance dimensions, including quality, efficiency, and asset
management, are well controlled.
Third, the assessment of whether good performance assurance has been achieved is difficult
and subjective. An informed expert might judge that the control system in place is adequate
because no major bad surprises are likely, but this judgment is subject to error because
adequacy must be measured against a future that can be very difficult to assess.
 Fourth, better control is not always economically desirable. Like any other economic good,
the control tools are costly and should be implemented only if the expected benefits exceed
the costs.
Effective control systems tend to have certain common characteristics. The importance of
these characteristics varies with the situation, but in general effective control systems have
following characteristics.
1. Accuracy
Effective controls generate accurate data and information. Accurate information is essential
for effective managerial decisions. Inaccurate controls would divert management efforts and
energies on problems that do not exist or have a low priority and would fail to alert managers
to serious problems that do require attention.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       227
Learner Manual
2. Timeliness:
There are many problems that require immediate attention. If information about such
problems does not reach management in a timely manner, then such information may
become useless and damage may occur. Accordingly, controls must ensure that information
reaches the decision makers when they need it so that a meaningful response can follow.
3. Flexibility:
The business and economic environment is highly dynamic in nature. Technological changes
occur very fast. A rigid control system would not be suitable for a changing environment.
These changes highlight the need for flexibility in planning as well as in control Strategic
planning must allow for adjustments for unanticipated threats and opportunities. Similarly,
managers must make modifications in controlling methods, techniques and systems as they
become necessary. An effective control system is one that can be updated quickly as the
need arises.
4. Acceptability:
Controls should be such that all people who are affected by it are able to understand them
fully and accept them. A control system that is difficult to understand can cause unnecessary
mistakes and frustration and may be resented by workers.
Accordingly, employees must agree that such controls are necessary and appropriate and will
not have any negative effects on their efforts to achieve their personal as well as
organizational goals.
5. Integration:
When the controls are consistent with corporate values and culture, they work in harmony
with organizational policies and hence are easier to enforce. These controls become an
integrated part of the organizational environment and thus become effective.
6. Economic feasibility:
The cost of a control system must be balanced against its benefits. The system must be
economically feasible and reasonable to operate. For example, a high security system to
safeguard nuclear secrets may be justified but the same system to safeguard office supplies
in a store would not be economically justified. Accordingly, the benefits received must
outweigh the cost of implementing a control system.
7. Strategic placement:
8. Corrective action:
An effective control system not only checks for and identifies deviation but also is
programmed to suggest solutions to correct such a deviation. For example, a computer
keeping a record of inventories can be programmed to establish “if-then” guidelines. For
example, if inventory of a particular item drops below five percent of maximum inventory at
hand, then the computer will signal for replenishment for such items.
9. Emphasis on exception:
A good system of control should work on the exception principle, so that only important
deviations are brought to the attention of management, In other words, management does not
have to bother with activities that are running smoothly. This will ensure that managerial
attention is directed towards error and not towards conformity. This would eliminate
unnecessary and uneconomic supervision, marginally beneficial reporting and a waste of
managerial time.
Control-Problem Avoidance
In most situations, managers can avoid some control problems by allowing no opportunities
for improper behavior. One possibility is automation. Computers and other means of
automation reduce the organization's exposure to control problems because they can be set
to perform appropriately (that is, as the organization desires), and they will perform more
consistently than do human beings. Consequently, control is improved.
Another avoidance possibility is centralization, such as that which takes place with very
critical decisions at most organization levels. If a manager makes all the decisions in certain
areas, those areas cease to be control problems in a managerial sense because no other
persons are involved.
If management cannot or chooses not to avoid the control problems caused by relying on
other individuals, they must address the problems by implementing one or more control
tactics. The large number of tactics that are available to help achieve good control can be
classified usefully into three main categories, according to the object of control; that is,
whether control is exercised over specific actions, results, or personnel. Table 1 shows many
common controls classified according to their control object; these controls are described in
the following sections.
The brutal reality is that the selling price for most products is set by the market. In many
applications, price erosion has been significant. But you can compete. Look at the diagram
below. What are the parameters you can control?
You usually can’t influence the selling price unless you have a unique product or a niche
application.         In order to increase profits, you must vigorously eliminate cost in your
manufacturing and business transaction processes. Time for a gut check. Do you have the
courage to commit some talented resources to reduce defects and eliminate non-value added
manufacturing operations? Are you willing to take a fresh look at how your customers place
an order or how customer service is handled? Or how invoices are processed and you
answer the phones? This won’t be an easy task, but the failure to act is even more painful.
Let’s look at the concept in the above figure in a different way. In Figure One, we show the
selling price and total cost as a function of time. There are two possible scenarios depicted in
Figure One. For both examples, the selling price decreases over time. The dashed line
shows the total cost over time. Without continuous improvement, the total cost will eventually
reach the selling price and subsequently exceed the selling price. Not a good situation.
Moving from left to right, the dashed-dot line shows the cost over time when the business
actively reduces both the manufacturing and business process costs.
The company that embarks on the continuous process improvement journey will always have
a profitable business unless the selling price decreases faster than the cost reduction curve.
In most cases, there is a point where the total costs cannot be reduced further. In this case, if
the price decrease does not stabilize, then the wise action is to get out of that product, or
have an improved new product ready where you can make a good profit again
The solution lies in the area of process management.          All work activities are a process
whether they are in manufacturing or in the office. The process can be graphically described
using a technique called a process map or flow diagram. For each individual process step or
for the overall process, the key input and output variables are identified
The controllable key process inputs are termed the X’s and the key process outputs are
termed the Y’s. The outputs (Y’s) are a function of the X’s. In mathematical terms, Y = f (X).
The process management approach is to identify and improve key Y’s.
                 a. Identify the key process outputs critical to customer satisfaction (find the key
                      Y’s)
                 b. Investigate how the input variables (the X’s) impact the critical Y’s
                 c. Prioritize the key X’s
                 d. Reduce variation and control the key process inputs (the X’s)
For example, in the manufacturing of a printed circuit board, the final thickness may be a key
output variable for a particular customer part. During the final lamination process, the key
input variables might be layer thickness, the amount of resin to bond the layers together, the
press heating rate, and lamination pressure. Design of Experiments (DOE’s) are typically
used to establish how the key input variables control or influence the key output variables.
In the printed circuit board case, the heating rate and pressure have a large influence on the
final part thickness. These variables can be controlled using a standard operating procedure
(SOP) such as a computer-controlled lamination process that is set for a given part number.
The key process variables are also measured and documented in a process log or traveller
that accompanies the order.
Noise variables are defined as inputs that will have an impact on the output variables but are
very difficult or very expensive to control. An example of a noise variable would be relative
humidity in the vicinity of a coating process. Moisture can affect the coating process by
changing the viscosity and impact the curing rate if moisture interacts with the catalyst. To
control noise variables, two approaches can be used:
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                             234
Learner Manual
Six Sigma is a systematic process and management method for improving, building, and
sustaining business performance. Six Sigma uses a structured approach and toolset focused
on reducing variation and delivering near defect-free products and services. The Six Sigma
toolkit can be used for a variety of applications, including manufacturing cost reductions,
developing new products (Design for Six Sigma), and business process improvements
(Transactional Six Sigma).
A balanced approach addresses both customer focused and internal process improvement
projects. To maximize the potential gains, the project portfolio should contain a balance of
both short-term and long-term improvement projects.
          Identify the key process outputs critical to customer satisfaction (find the key Y’s) 2.
           Investigate how the input variables (the X’s) impact the critical Y’s 3. Prioritize the key
           X’s 4. Reduce variation and control the key process inputs (the X’s)
For example, in the manufacturing of a printed circuit board, the final thickness may be a key
output variable for a particular customer part. During the final lamination process, the key
input variables might be layer thickness, the amount of resin to bond the layers together, the
press heating rate, and lamination pressure. Design of Experiments (DOE’s) are typically
used to establish how the key input variables control or influence the key output variables.
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                           235
Learner Manual
In the printed circuit board case, the heating rate and pressure have a large influence on the
final part thickness. These variables can be controlled using a standard operating procedure
(SOP) such as a computer-controlled lamination process that is set for a given part number.
The key process variables are also measured and documented in a process log or traveller
that accompanies the order.
Noise variables are defined as inputs that will have an impact on the output variables but are
very difficult or very expensive to control. An example of a noise variable would be relative
humidity in the vicinity of a coating process. Moisture can affect the coating process by
changing the viscosity and impact the curing rate if moisture interacts with the catalyst. To
control noise variables, two approaches can be used:
Six Sigma is a systematic process and management method for improving, building, and
sustaining business performance. Six Sigma uses a structured approach and toolset focused
on reducing variation and delivering near defect-free products and services. The Six Sigma
toolkit can be used for a variety of applications, including manufacturing cost reductions,
developing new products (Design for Six Sigma), and business process improvements
(Transactional Six Sigma).
A balanced approach addresses both customer focused and internal process improvement
projects. To maximize the potential gains, the project portfolio should contain a balance of
both short-term and long-term improvement projects.
The following is an example of a good Six Sigma project.               Acme Widgets Inc. is the
manufacturer of a really cool new toy. There is tremendous market demand. To keep up
with the customer demand, Acme installed two new molding machines. The engineers found
that for one part of a subassembly, a critical part dimension was changing in a random way.
This caused problems at final assembly, since the parts wouldn’t fit properly.
The part variation was traced back to the two new machines. There also was variability
between the two new machines.            Operators said that they had trouble keeping the new
machines running in spec and hated to run the new equipment. Scrap from the two new
machines is costing Acme $2,000 per day. Customers are upset because Acme can’t ship
enough of the cool new toys and some are defective.
Analysis:
Six Sigma Projects are led by Black Belts who are highly trained in all aspects of the DMAIC
process. Green belts are project team members and have training in most of the Six Sigma
tools and approaches.
Define: Select the appropriate customer-focused defect or problem. Document the business
impact and the project deliverables in the project charter. Form a multidisciplinary team.
Measure:          Develop a factual understanding of the current process and locate sources of
problems. Establish “as-is” process map, measure process capability, and collect data to
give a baseline of the current process.
Analyze: Identify potential root causes of defects or sources of variation. Investigate the
causes of defects using experiments (and statistical analysis). Verify the root cause(s) of the
problem.
Control: Implement methods to hold the gains such as standard operating procedures and
statistical process controls (SPC).
PROCESSES.
Small businesses often have difficulty competing with larger competitors that are able to
mass produce products at low costs. Continuous quality improvement is a business
management system that companies of all sizes can employ. Continuous quality
improvement focuses on identifying sub-optimal processes in a business and changing them
to reduce defects and improve quality.
Error Reduction
Continuous quality improvement can reduce the number errors your business makes.
Defective products and mistakes made when providing services are examples of errors that
can be costly. Because small companies cannot produce goods and services in mass like
larger companies, errors can be especially costly. Focusing on continuously identifying
potential sources of errors and fixing them can avoid problems that might
Increased Adaptability
A philosophy of continuous quality improvement can make a business better equipped to
adapt to changes in an industry, take advantage of opportunities and avoid threats.
Processes in a company pursuing continuous quality improvement continually undergo
incremental changes. Companies used to continually implement changes are better equipped
to adapt their businesses to changing markets than those that employ rigid processes, such
companies engaged in mass production.
Increased Productivity
Continuous quality improvement can result in hiccups in productivity in the short term as
businesses implement better processes, but it can lead to increased productivity in the long
term. For example, a small business that revises its production processes might have to shut
down production for a day to implement the improvements, resulting in a day of lost
production. After the changes take effect, though, the company might have fewer production
slowdowns and higher productivity.
Improved Morale
Continuous quality improvement focuses on improving business processes as a means to
improve a company rather than blaming workers for sources of inefficiency. According to the
Louisiana Department of Children & Family Services, one of the main benefits of continuous
quality improvement is that it can improve staff morale. Workers with high morale tend to be
more productive and less likely to quit their jobs than workers with low morale. Reducing
The fact is that most changes are either just made to the business or made through more
formal focused changes to IT systems. They are made to help the requester and to be fair, IT
applications changes are often analyzed to see if they will cause problems with the
application and to see if the change will impact other applications.
However, business changes are seldom analyzed for their impact on other business units or
to the way a company works with internal and external collaborative partners.
Unfortunately, time has shown that even small changes can each cause disruptions in the
way work is performed. These small changes are usually ignored. People just make do and
get by. But these individually insignificant disruptions add to create a growing imbalance in
the business operation – the way people work and in the way applications and data are used.
This imbalance can eventually seriously impair operational effectiveness and efficiency, and
compliance with regulation. It can also require the addition of manual work to make the
workflow function at an acceptable level of performance.
Any business operation will have some elasticity and be able to absorb a certain amount of
change. I find that this is generally related to the creativity of the business area’s managers
and the flexibility of staff in adjusting to changes. But there comes a point where elasticity is
exceeded and the operation starts to become ineffective and inefficient.
Works gets done, but it is a messy process. However, reaching this point happens slowly and
it is often not noticed until staff needs to be added or quality becomes an issue.
If this is allowed to happen, continuous improvement can yield less than favourable results
Every company is changing continuously. Like taxes, no one can avoid it for long. The issue
is that much of the change is unplanned, focused on a specific issue, and meant to get
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       240
Learner Manual
around problems caused by such things as other changes in the business unit, work volume
increase, IT support deficiencies, regulation changes, reporting requirements, and the effect
of changes in other parts of the business.
These changes just happen and they happen every day. Do they improve the operation?
Arguably they do since they get around problems. Do they introduce inefficiency and
ineffectiveness? Yes, they do. Are they destructive? Yes, they are. But, are they needed?
Yes, they are, since the company would have many more problems without them.
The real issue is that they are uncontrolled and while they are needed, they can introduce
quality problems into the operation. While these changes lead to operational issues, introduce
manual activity, and lead to error, they are necessary and they will be necessary until
technology finds a way to support very rapid, low cost, low impact business change.
Add to this somewhat chaotic change environment, the ripple effect of planned narrowly
focused improvements. While these small projects each provide some benefit, the project
teams usually pay little attention to upstream or downstream workflow or process impact. This
adds to an accumulating impact that will eventually ripple through the operation as a growing
inefficiency.
BPMS supported BPM is a step in the right direction, but it requires set up time and
investment. However, once in place it does deliver low cost rapid change. But even using
BPM, if changes are still focused on isolated issues they will still introduce minor
inconsistencies. When taken together, these inconsistencies will still eventually result in a
slow degradation of performance. I call this the "mediocrity cycle".
Unlike unplanned change, most planned and managed changes are the foundation for a
company’s continuous improvement effort. When applied in an ongoing manner, they are in
fact beneficial and continuous.
But - the infamous "but"! - when they are narrowly focused and fail to consider the real impact
of the changes on other parts of the work and on other parts of the business, they will begin
to change the work in unthought-of ways.
Scope is the king in these projects. Budgets are tight and only absolutely necessary work can
be applied included in the project – so as little as possible is really changed in any project.
That is the problem.
Scoping Consideration
This scope limitation issue can be a real problem. This is different than the inclusion of
additional "unnecessary" business areas or work to the scope needed to make the change. It
is also different from the "taboo" issue of "scope creep" – the constant addition of
requirements or considerations to a project once the scope has been agreed upon. But with
To avoid this scope creep, most improvement projects are performed in the same manner as
if the project manager had "blinders" on.
For younger readers, "blinders" were put on horses – those things we see on either side of
the horse’s eyes. Their purpose was to stop the horse from seeing anything but what is
straight ahead – they limit the field of vision or scope of vision. The horse cannot see to either
side so it just keeps moving forward. Project scope is the same idea. It limits what the project
manager can look at and stops him or her from straying to either side or outside their field of
vision – so they keep moving down the prescribed path.
But sometimes that causes problems. Without being able to see to either side, accidents
cannot be avoided and it is easy to set up conditions for problems that will happen in the
future. In doing this, they can drive unintended consequences in other areas – the ripple
effect.
The fact is that nothing in any company works in isolation. Everything is connected and every
change in one area can cause changes to work in other areas of the business. However,
these connections are not always apparent and finding them often requires an analysis of
workflow and connections across organization boundaries. This takes investigation and
analysis time – and time is one thing that is in short supply in most projects. So, this
investigation is one of the things that are often dropped from consideration.
Now please don’t misunderstand me. I am not saying that scope definition is a bad thing. I am
simply saying that the scope should be adjusted to include consideration for an analysis of
both upstream and downstream impact for any change in the process and its workflows.
Why? Because it is these impacts that introduce operational issues outside of scope as some
actions/input/rules/deliverables are changed. So, is this consideration of such a low value that
it should be optional?
The fact is that even small changes chip away at the validity of business rules/performance
standards, the ability to monitor compliance, and the ability to be both effective and efficient.
That is just a fact.
The reason is that a process is normally tens to hundreds of tasks long. Each process often
involves multiple business units and many are complex. Even many workflows within a
process can be long and complex. When anything changes, the change will impact the way
work is done – that is why the change is being made. You want a positive impact. But aside
That is why any consideration of increasing project scope to include an impact consideration
is not a trivial matter.
Controlling change
As noted above, unless the ripple impact of changes is controlled, sooner or later the result is
that the business operation will reach a point where it must undergo serious redesign. This
was recognized in the Business Process Reengineering move of the 1990s.
It was broadly recognized that work was inefficient and often ineffective. Much of it was
manual and the reason for many of the activities that were being performed had been lost.
The result was the call for "radical transformation". Some even said you needed to start with
a blank slate and redesign the business from scratch.
Of course, that didn’t work well for a lot of reasons, but it did recognize that change must
eventually be looked at from a broad and holistic perspective.
From recent history, we know that many who "reengineered" found that inefficiency was
creeping back into the operation or had already crept back into the operation. That was one
of the real reasons behind the recognition that companies needed to adopt continuous
improvement – trying to avoid this creeping degradation.
That was a great move and brought in a lot of advances – like Lean and Six Sigma. But we
are still seeing ineffectiveness and inefficiency creeping back in and we have to ask why it is
happening. Looking at that question is what this column is really all about.
So, while we have come a long way down the path to continuous improvement, I think we
have a long way yet to go. We need to find a way to get rid of the "mediocrity cycle".
One of the first steps may be to include ripple evaluation in all projects. (But that may be hard
to justify due to the time and resource cost.) A second step may be to revaluate the efficiency
and effectiveness of processes and workflows on a given cycle to "adjust" them and better
integrate all the business, legal, financial, and IT related changes that have been made over
the time of the cycle. This cycle, should not, however, be in years. It should be done at least
annually and every six months would be better.
Culture is key
Continuous Improvement is not simply an IT or process issue. All activity eventually comes
down to people. Any move to consider continuous improvement and the cultural changes
noted above requires that people from all areas and from senior officers to line managers to
factory workers, need to be engaged. It also requires that people be dedicated in different
aspects of a comprehensive program that evaluates ongoing change for its impact on other
parts of the business or IT operation.
This is the hardest part – just as dealing with culture is the hardest part of any program. Why?
Some people will accept, some will reject, some will fight, some will sabotage, and some will
just ignore.
As a general rule, most people resist change in some way. This is especially true when it
affects something they are evaluated on – everyone hates being evaluated. When people
have been successful with the way things are done, they will naturally be afraid of moving to
a different way – after all, they may not be successful in the new way.
For this reason, any move to include ripple impact evaluation in a project’s scope relies on
the participation of the people who will be involved. Control over the perception of this
evaluation is critical and will make or break this type of review. Formal human resource
change management is thus important and should be a long-term consideration in most
companies.
The fact is that if people perceive that they are being judged, they will be much less
cooperative. Culture thus plays a critical role in both continuous improvement and in any type
of operational ripple evaluation
KT0804 EXPLAIN THE TYPICAL PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES
Forward thinking companies are taking steps to successfully address this negative view of
performance management. They are implementing innovative solutions that ensure
processes deliver real results and improve performance. The purpose of this guide is to
provide concrete guidelines and practical steps that can be used to improve the performance
management processes at your organization. In addition, a new class of automated
performance management solutions has emerged to specifically address small- and medium-
sized businesses..
a. Occurrence management
A cycle of events reflects the process of occurrence management. When occurrences are
found, they must all be investigated to find the causes of the problem. The investigation will
help to identify the actions needed to correct the problem and to ensure that it does not occur
again. All necessary communication must take place, including informing any health care
providers whose clients are affected.
Detecting occurrences
occurrences
Occurrences are detected through a variety of investigative techniques.          Monitoring of
complaints and satisfaction surveys will yield much information. Once the laboratory
establishes and monitors quality indicators, deficits will be noted. The tools of external
assessment, such as proficiency testing, external quality assessment, accreditation and
certification processes, will be very useful in occurrence management. A very valuable tool is
the use of the internal audit, which can be performed at any time in the laboratory. The
laboratory’s process improvement efforts will identify opportunities for improvement.
It is the responsibility of management to review all the information that results from use of
these tools, to look for underlying patterns and potential causes for persistent or repeated
error.
Investigation involves gathering complete and detailed information about events that led to a
problem, and a thorough analysis to determine all the factors that contributed to the problem
occurrence
The most aggressive and complete approach to addressing occurrences is to seek the root
cause of the problem. This is more than just a thorough examination but is a planned and
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                     246
Learner Manual
organized approach toward finding not only the superficial causes of a problem, but also the
deeper, or core problems. With some occurrences, they are likely to occur and reoccur until
such time as the true root causes are discovered and addressed.
The example shown illustrates how root cause analysis was used to determine how a major
blood transfusion reaction could occur.
There are several levels of action that may be undertaken to rectify occurrences, including
the following.
  •    Preventive actions involve a planned and organized evaluation of processes and
       procedures to identify potential error points, so action can be taken to prevent the errors
       from ever occurring. Preventive actions require planning and team participation.
  •    Remedial action, or remediation, is the fixing of any consequences that result from an
       error.       For example, if an erroneous result has been reported, it is essential to
       immediately notify all persons concerned about this error, and to provide the correct
       result.
  •    Corrective actions address the cause of the error. If a test was done incorrectly,
       resulting in an incorrect result, corrective actions sort out why the test was not
       performed properly, and steps are taken so that the error does not happen again. As an
       example, a piece of equipment may have been malfunctioning, and the corrective
       actions would be to recalibrate, repair, or otherwise address the equipment problem.
The management process for dealing with errors or occurrences involves several steps. The
laboratory should develop a system for prompt investigation of every laboratory problem and
error.
                 a. Establish a process to detect all problems, using the tools that are available.
                      Remember that problems may go undetected unless there is an active system
                      for looking for them.
                 b. Keep a log of all problem events that records the error, any investigation
                      activities, and any actions taken.
                 c. Investigate the causes of any problem that is detected, and carefully analyze
                      the information that is available
                 d. Take the necessary action—remedial and corrective, and if the problem is
                      detected before the error actually occurs, preventive action.
                 e. Monitor and observe for any recurrence of the original problem, keeping in
                      mind that there may be a systemic problem.
                 f.   Provide information to all those who need it, and to those who are affected by
                      the error.
Responsibilities
The responsibility for monitoring for occurrence belongs to everyone in the laboratory. It is
important, however, that someone be designated as the person responsible for marshalling
the energies and activities of all staff into an effective management process. In many
instances, this is the responsibility of the laboratory director, or laboratory manager, or the
quality manager.
Nonconformance Types
          Method
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                          248
Learner Manual
           Manpower
           Machinery
           Materials
           Environment
Not reporting, or a delay in reporting an NC can severely impact processes and result in an
observation. If unsure, take the conservative approach and report it anyways!
Classification
Major Nonconformance
                 o    Moderate Risk of product impact to SISPQ (Safety, Identity, Strength, Purity,
                      Quality
                 o    Product impact requires additional testing and is not immediately known
                 o    Probability of future detection is MODERATE – HIGH
                 o    Controls and testing in place to detect this event, however did not detect this
                      event
                 o    Low - Medium probability of impact to Quality of subsequent lots
Critical Nonconformance
  •       High Risk of product impact to SISPQ (Safety, Identity, Strength, Purity, Quality
  •       Product impact requires additional testing and is not immediately known
  •       Probability of future detection is LOW
  •       Controls and testing in place to detect this event, however did not detect this event
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                           249
Learner Manual
  •    High probability of impact to Quality of subsequent lots
A Lessons Learned Process is one that crosses functional boundaries and allows an
organization to learn from both its mistakes and its successes. An effective Lessons Learned
process should prevent us from repeating our mistakes and allow us to repeat our successes.
It should be an instrumental part of any organization’s overall “continuous improvement”
process.
Leadership
“The lack of leadership involvement in and commitment to the learning process is the most
critical barrier.” An effective Lessons Learned process means having a disciplined procedure
that people are held accountable to follow. It means encouraging openness about making
mistakes or errors in judgment.
 It often means cultural or organizational change, which does not come easy in most
organizations. It means leading by example. If management is unwilling to learn from their
mistakes, it is unlikely that the rest of the organization will be willing to admit to mistakes. In
fact, management must reward people for being open and admitting to making mistakes, bad
decisions, judgment errors, etc. This, of course, flies in the face of many corporate cultures.
When something goes wrong on a project, there is someone accountable. One of the biggest
problems in implementing an effective Lessons Learned process is to separate the
“accountability” issue from the “process” issue. Accountability is important but is something to
be dealt with by management. Lessons Learned must deal with the process deficiency that
caused the problem (e.g., inadequate procedure, too much of a rush, inadequate training,
poor communications, etc.). Once a Lessons Learned process focuses on “blame” or “finger
pointing,” the process will soon fade into oblivion.
On small projects, one can often wait until the end to capture and document the Lessons
Learned. On larger, longer term projects, the Lessons Learned should be captured during or
at the end of each project stage (e.g., Planning, Detail Design, Construction, Start-up, etc.).
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                        250
Learner Manual
As time passes, memories fade, people leave the project and, if not captured in a timely
manner, significant lessons are likely to be lost. All projects should have a formal post-project
review.
The purpose of this review is to review the Lessons Learned on the project (i.e., confirm
those that have already been captured and/or add new ones). Post-project reviews can be
stressful, especially when the project failed to meet its stated objectives. On large projects
especially, it is essential that these reviews are effectively facilitated to ensure the focus is on
process improvement and not on “who to blame.” Norman Kerth expressed it well when he
stated, “.…we assume that everyone did the best job that they could, given what they knew at
the time. We are not here to pass judgment on what happened but to learn and grow from our
collective experience.”
Validation
For many problems, the root cause of the problem is not always apparent. Learning cannot
take place until the root cause(s) have been properly identified and appropriate corrective
action(s) taken. This requires that each Lesson Learned be analyzed and validated by a
subject matter expert (SME) before it is entered in the database. The validation process must
be simple and straight forward. “A major contributor to making things too complicated is
management’s insistence on a lengthy validation process. This discourages sustained,
meaningful contribution, because people quickly become frustrated with the formal system
and return to the simpler water-cooler method of knowledge sharing.”
Lessons Learned should be captured and placed in a database that is readily available to
everyone in the organization. Unfortunately, many well-meaning Lessons Learned databases
focus more on the problem than the solution, are difficult to search and provide little help to
future projects. Like any effective database, the Lessons Learned database must have an
administrator whose job is to ensure that:
Placing Lessons Learned in a database only means we have documented and communicated
the lessons. The “learning” part only comes when the lesson has been institutionalized (e.g.,
changing a policy, writing a procedure, revising a standard, issuing a new specification,
improving a work process, etc.). This is the tough part of Lessons Learned. As author Alvin
Toffler stated, “It is always easier to talk about change than to make it.” Until the learning has
become a part of the way we do business, we will always be prone to make the same
mistakes. The Lessons Learned database will contain many different types of learnings, but
the Lessons Learned process must ensure that the most significant lessons are
institutionalized.
In a survey of 36 owner and contractor companies, the Construction Industry Institute found
that a number of the companies had well-defined procedures for collecting Lessons Learned,
but most were considerably less effective in actually analysing and implementing solutions.
Since Lessons Learned mostly come from the things that didn’t go well and need
improvement, we tend to focus on these “negative” learnings. Many times, however, our
project teams come up with imaginative and creative ways to do things that save time, money
and improve performance. These “positive” learnings also need to be institutionalized and
repeated. We need to make sure these “positive” learnings get in our Lessons Learned
database and, this time, it’s also okay to “point fingers.”
Legal Issues
If you document your mistakes, publish them in a database and make the database virtually
accessible to everyone, are you opening yourself up for legal action? In today’s litigious
society, there is certainly some risk. The Construction Industry Institute indicates that “most
legal experts agree that the possible use of lessons learned documentation during discovery
has legal consequences such as failure to follow standard processes or not taking corrective
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       252
Learner Manual
actions due to past mistakes.” I’m afraid, though, that if you get your lawyers involved in the
validation process, nothing will ever make its way through to the database. I believe this is an
issue where management must decide on how to handle the trade-off between improving
project performance and risking legal action.
Is It Working?
d. Modification management
 Change projects result in new policies, processes, protocols, or systems to which staff must
become accustomed, and change management is used to facilitate the transition involves the
selection of strategies to facilitate the transition of individuals, teams, or organizations from a
current state of operation to the new, desired state. More specifically, it involves a process
and set of techniques to manage the feelings, perceptions, and reactions of the people
affected by the change being introduced. The impetus of any organizational change initiative
is to improve some aspect of operations or longer-term outcomes.
Change projects result in new policies, processes, protocols, or systems to which staff must
become accustomed, and change management is used to facilitate the transition Modification
management is essential to sustaining a culture of quality.
Quality improvement (QI) is about designing system and process changes that lead to
operational improvements, and an organizational culture of quality is one in which concepts of
quality are ingrained in organizational values, goals, practices, and processes. In the context
of quality, change could be something as discrete as a revised contracts approval process
resulting from a QI project, or it could be something as transformational as a complete shift to
an organizational strategy and culture that embraces quality. In both cases, structural and
process changes are introduced and change management is key to facilitate employee
transition to the new state
The “human” side of change involves strategies to help employees impacted by the change
understand and adopt it as a part of their jobs (e.g., alleviate staff resistance, meet training
needs, secure buy-in). In the contracting example, employees engaged in any aspect of
contracting must understand the urgency for a revised process, have input into the new
process, and be trained in the new process.
Both aspects of change should be integrated and occur simultaneously for successful
change, however, the change leader(s) may need to think of the “process” and “human”
changes distinctly when assessing and addressing roadblocks. For example, an organization
may have full employee buy-in for a particular change initiative but adequate resources and
planning efforts have not been put in place to support the change. Alternatively, appropriate
structures and processes may be in place but employees remain resistant to the initiative.
The change management process is the sequence of steps or activities that a change
management team or project leader follow to apply change management to a change in order
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                       254
Learner Manual
to drive individual transitions and ensure the project meets its intended outcomes. The below
elements have been identified from research as key elements of a successful change
management process.
READINESS ASSESSMENTS
  Assessments are tools used by a change management team or project leader to assess the
  organization's readiness to change. Readiness assessments can include organizational
  assessments,            culture   and   history   assessments,   employee   assessments,     sponsor
  assessments and change assessments. Each tool provides the project team with insights into
  the challenges and opportunities they may face during the change process. What to assess:
You will also need to assess the strengths of your change management team and change
sponsors, then take the first steps to enable them to effectively lead the change process.
  Many managers assume that if they communicate clearly with their employees, their job is
  done. However, there are many reasons why employees may not hear or understand what
  their managers are saying the first time around. In fact, you may have heard that messages
  need to be repeated five to seven times before they are cemented into the minds of
  employees.
        1. The audience
        2. What is communicated
When it is communicated
  For example, the first step in managing change is building awareness around the need for
  change and creating a desire among employees. Therefore, initial communications are
  typically designed to create awareness around the business reasons for change and the risk
  Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                        256
Learner Manual
of not changing. Likewise, at each step in the process, communications should be designed
to share the right messages at the right time.
Communication planning, therefore, begins with a careful analysis of the audiences, key
messages and the timing for those messages. The change management team or project
leaders must design a communication plan that addresses the needs of frontline employees,
supervisors and executives. Each audience has particular needs for information based on
their role in the implementation of the change.
RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT
Resistance from employees and managers is normal and can be proactively addressed.
Persistent resistance, however, can threaten a project. The change management team needs
to identify, understand and help leaders manage resistance throughout the organization.
Resistance management is the processes and tools used by managers and executives with
the support of the change team to manage employee resistance.
Early adoption, successes and long-term wins must be recognized and celebrated. Individual
and group recognition is a necessary component of change management in order to cement
and reinforce the change in the organization. Continued adoption needs to be monitored to
ensure employees do not slip back into their old ways of working.
AFTER-PROJECT REVIEW
The final step in the change management process is the after-action review. It is at this point
that you can stand back from the entire program, evaluate successes and failures, and
identify process changes for the next project. This is part of the ongoing, continuous
improvement of change management for your organization and ultimately leads to change
competency.
KT0805 EXPLAIN THE IMPORTANCE OF STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS IN ENSURING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
Refining processes at all levels of your federation is part of continuous improvement. The
most successful organisations in the world – business, non-profit, political, etc. – have
developed formal continuous improvement programmes that aim to make all organisational
functions and resources work better and more efficiently over time.
A solid definition of continuous improvement is: The belief that an organisation must
constantly measure the effectiveness of its processes and strive to meet more difficult
objectives to satisfy customers.
In other words, continuous improvement is about setting clear goals, having ways to measure
progress toward those goals, refining goals and strategies based on those measurements
and setting new goals over time to satisfy your customers.
So, what are the basics of continuous improvement? It is more than just being committed to
doing a better job over time – it is about involving employees at all levels to make doing a
better job an inherent aspect of the way your federation functions.
     On completion of this section you will be able to understand concepts and principles of
     change management and how to apply these principles when implementing new systems
KT0901 Define change and give reasons why the implementation of changes in an
organisation must be managed;
KT0902 Explain the typical responses of people to change and how they impact on the
effectiveness of implementing changes in organisations.
KT0903 Describe a typical change management process and give examples of what must
be done to help people understand and accept change.
MANAGED
Many examples of change are present in industry these days, from changing the way we
monitor condition of our equipment, to changing the way we manage and interact with our
people to changing the way we approach health and safety.
Determining what needs change is relatively easy – implementing that change, however, is
the difficult part. To be able to implement change, you need to manage it, and this
management is not as simple as sending the people on the training and showing them the
equipment that needs improvement. This management is required because a series of
complex interactions occur when we try and change something that is happening at our work
places.
Definition
Change is to make different in some particular: alter; to make radically different: transform
1. Rebirth – where a change to the way we do things needs to occur and the inertia to change
needs to be overcome. Performance may actually drop due to misunderstanding, mistrust or
even just the time it takes to get organized and train the personnel.
2. Stage 2 is the Growth when people start following the new processes and increasingly
come on board when they see that the changes implemented are effective or showing results.
 3. Maturity then occurs when the issues being addressed are no longer the major issues on
site. Benefit gained from the new processes will appear to slow down – this is an indicator
Not managing the introduction correctly can not only result in extended implementation time
but can seriously affect the total benefits from the initiative targeted. Issues contributing to
this lag in implementation (and possible initial deterioration) may include: Psychological
Work
            Workload increases with new tasks but headcount stays the same (or decreases
             with a new contract)
            Incorrect or inexperienced personnel allocated to initiative
            Learning curve for new method requires time
            Priority of task missing or wrong. Initiative either planned too early, or lower impact
             tasks allowed to take preference
Major tasks that need to be incorporated to address these issues include: Communication –
awareness of new process, business case for it, how it aligns with other current initiatives and
how this will affect the individual personnel.
Existing tasks should be evaluated and low impact tasks removed or postponed to make time
for the new initiative. The major objective for targeting this stage is to minimize the rebirth
disruption and duration and start getting the benefit from the initiative. In fig 2
Growth
Growth refers to the period where the site obtains the benefits the initiative is designed to
return (fig 3). By addressing Rebirth, the growth stage can occur earlier, but it is now
important to maximise the rate of growth so the site can achieve the results faster. Issues
contributing to a delay in gaining the full benefits are similar to the reasons behind the rebirth
lag:
Maturity
Maturity refers to the time when the majority of the results are achieved from the particular
initiative (fig 4). Caution must be exercised as if the project is stopped completely, a
performance drop or decline can be expected. By recognizing maturity, the site plan can be
adjusted for the next phase of work.
Major tasks which need to be addressed include: Organizational support – Review of KPIs to
ensure       they      are        appropriate,   accurate   and   have   no   unintended   consequences.
Communication
– Monitor and discuss KPIs regularly Renewal / Stagnation / Decline Monitoring performance
is important to identify the maturity period. What happens at this point is critical. If nothing
changes, results will stagnate and frustration will build up due to lack of progress. If the site
believes the project is complete and stops it completely, the issues causing the problems in
the first place will slowly be re-introduced to the site and the results will decline – the benefit
will be lost and the project will have to be re-initiated at a later date. The maturity time should
trigger two actions:
KT0902 EXPLAIN THE TYPICAL RESPONSES OF PEOPLE TO CHANGE AND HOW THEY IMPACT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
Change today is more complex, often more transformational and the pace of change is ever
increasing. This means we need to spend more time making sense of it all, learning about
things that go well and not so well –and more time as managers helping people cope When
change hits us, it disrupts the status quo and can really de-stabilise people, especially if it
means giving up things they hold dear
Responding to Change Anxiety and disorientation is a normal response, and people need
time to deal with what is happening. There are four main stages people go through
The length of time it takes to move between the stages depends on:
  •       The state of the individual
  •       The scale of the change
  •       The way change has been managed before
  •       How much change they have had to cope with recently
  •       The way this change is being managed
  •       Their level of involvement
Copyright © All Rights Reserved                                                             267
Learner Manual
  •    Support they get from others
If major change is needed its particularly important to contain (neither reject, nor reinforce
feelings and reactions). Anger, denial, anxiety, sadness and depression are all common.
As they are expressed and the realities of the situation are gradually absorbed more
considered responses and alternative proposals will emerge - that’s when it is time to offer
more detailed plans
Managers have a key role to play in helping people move through the stages
There are usually a small number who have learned to live through change programmes
without really changing at all
It’s saying:
            5% of people will lead the change
            20% get involved at the first opportunity
            50% wait and see what happens
            20% will when there is no other option
            5% will never change
Identify your early adopters, the people who are passionate, will lead and drive change-use
them to bring the rest on board. If you can win round someone who is known to be cynical/not
on board to the point where they champion change that can have a powerful impact on
others. Go around the 5% that will never change like water over a stone- or give them an exit
strategy!
(Bear in mind the reality is there are those who start off as enthusiasts who are suffering from
initiative overload and become jaded having had to cope with one initiative after another –
find ways to give them some stability however small)
Drivers are proactive, task-orientated types who are always willing to lead. They love change
and will throw themselves into new and untested areas because they live in the present
moment. What they lack in reflective skills they make up for in energy. Pushed to the brink
they become tyrants.
Expressive are proactive, people orientated types who have a lot of imagination, intuition and
creativity. They are good at looking at the world in fresh ways and look forward for their
inspiration rather than back. Their lack of task orientation however, means that they are more
likely to talk a good change story than to deliver a good change. At the extreme, they can
become so enamoured of change that they can’t function in a stable environment.
 Amiables are reactive, people orientated types, the kind everyone loves to have around.
They are nature’s diplomats. They resist change because they don't like what it does to
people. They are experts in maintaining relationships but their orientation is stability and
ensuring other people’s needs are met. When pushed, they cave in.
Analyticals are the reactive, task orientated types, perfectionists who want to bar entry to the
unknown until it is proven safe. Their change mode is denial. They are victims of their own
clarity of thinking. Their facts must be the right facts and the need for certainty causes havoc
with the need for experimentation during change programmes. They look backwards for
inspiration. At their worst, analyticals lose themselves in the task and lose perspective in the
process.
These four types are at the extremes and most of us can be plotted towards some other point
on the graph but it can be a useful pointer to help you work out how people on your team
might cope with change.
Radical change is a change that have an impact on the whole system of the organization and
fundamentally redefine what the organization is or change its basic framework, including
strategy, structure, people, processes and (in some cases) core values. Radical change or
approach is used to address more fundamental problems especially in some situations, such
as after a period of flux or unexpected rapid change in the environment
 communication is the key factor for a successful change. many people will resist change,
especially if they do not understand why the change is being introduced. The resistance to
change could prevent the employee from adapting and progressing within the organisation.
Organisational change, such as the implementation of a new IT system, usually has a
negative impact on employees, especially since they perceive that they do not have any say
in the matter, and therefore, believe that such organisational change is not of their own
making, and it should, therefore, be feared
Lessened Efficiency
When employees spend time focusing on resisting the changes taking place in the workplace,
they become less focused on doing the daily tasks associated with their jobs. This leads to a
reduced level of efficiency and output among staff, which can affect the company's bottom
line. In fact, a reduced level of efficiency may fly directly in the face of the reason for the
changes in the first place, as changes are often made to become a more effective and
productive company
KT0903 DESCRIBE A TYPICAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND GIVE EXAMPLES OF WHAT MUST BE DONE TO HELP
All organisations need to deal with change events. Successful organisations are able to
manage change in a coherent manner and are able to generate the most benefit from
changes and improvements to the way they do business.
ISSUES.
It applies to changes in positions and functions considered to be safety critical. These would
be positions through which the exercise of normal roles and responsibilities can directly, by
lack of awareness, lack of training or negligence, cause a major incident involving a fatality,
fire, explosion, toxic release or community impact.
Examples are positions related to the safe design, operation and maintenance of a plant and
may include operators, line management and also support staff such as engineers,
maintenance, safety and emergency response and contractors performing safety critical
work.      It does not generally apply to administrative personnel or groups not related to
production that have no impact on the safe operation of a process. (e.g. cost accounting),
though caution is advised in ensuring that there are no significant indirect safety and health
effects as responsibilities are transferred to others or eliminated.