IMPACT OF THE STE PROGRAM ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF
GRADE 7 STUDENTS OF OQUENDO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
            MARIAH ANGEL LAURICE COQUILLA
                SARAH LEE F. MARTINEZ
                   ANA ROSE TANEO
                   MIGUEL NACMAN
                    EUGENE RUEDA
                   TRIXIA BANARES
                    JO-ANN ANIBAN
                    KENETH CACHO
                  RESEARCH ADVISER
            JHAN GLEND SALINO CASTANARES
                                    CHAPTER I
                                 INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
       The science, Technology and Engineering (STE) Program is the flagship
program for the development of Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Research in
Special Science Classes (SSC). The Science Curriculum Framework articulates
standards, sore competencies, approaches and underlying principles in Science for
Secondary schools in the country. The Special Program in Science, Technology and
Engineering (STE) offers a four-year curriculum based on the K to 12 secondary
Education Program, with a specialization in science.
       According to the study of Kazu and Yalcin (2021) In turkey shows that recent
advances in information and communication technology continue to affect each aspect
of society, along with important implications in the field of education. Countries
aiming to be a leader in the scientific and technological race also attach great
importance to science and mathematics education. For this reason, in order not to fall
behind in the technological race, they have adopted the basic aim of raising
individuals who understand science and mathematics conceptually well, associate
these concepts with daily events, and can solve the problems they face in daily life
with the information transferred in schools (Çepni, 2017). Dinçer (2014) argues that
the basic resource of the economy is individuals who can produce knowledge and use
them when necessary. For this reason, it is of great importance to educate the new
generation with skills such as analytical, creative, and critical thinking, which are
called 21st century skills. The way to gain these skills is through “STEM”, in other
words, science technology, engineering, and mathematics which is the basis of
today’s and future science and technological developments. STEM education, a
workforce consisting of individuals who are aware of STEM literacy, aims to
continue their current work in the STEM field, to produce innovations that will
provide an economic advantage to countries, and to be competent in future business
areas (Thomas, 2014).
        The Philippine Congress through Republic Act 10533 also known as the
Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013, provides for the mandatory evaluation and
review of the entirety of the K to 12 basic education in the country by the end of
school year 2014-2015. This evaluation and review aimed at establishing the status of
implementation vis-à-vis teachers, classrooms, textbooks, seats, toilets and other
shortages that should be addressed. It should be noted that this evaluation and review
covers the entire basic education curriculum including the STE program which is the
topic of this study. Nonetheless, the realities of the country’s basic education remains
at the realm of mediocrity as evident in the recent international measures of students’
performance. These are standards-based students’ assessment which have been
incrementally utilized by countries in gauging educational effectiveness (DeBoer,
2011). While it is noteworthy to mention that from 1995 to 2003 Philippines had
shown
significant improvement in its participation in TIMMS, the country remained at the
bottom ranks with students performing below the international average mark of 400.
In addition, in the 2018 conduct of Program for International Students Assessment
(PISA), the Philippines ranked lowest of the 79 countries assessed in Science and
Mathematics Literacy.
        In line with its thrust to strengthen science and mathematics education in the
Philippines and in support to the 2010 Secondary Education, the Department of
Education through the Bureau of Secondary Education (BSE), has officially
implemented the Engineering and Science Education Program (ESEP) now officially
known as Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) Program in 197 public
schools nationwide. This program offered advance subjects including research from
Grades 7 to 10 to cater to the intellectually promising and research-inclined
students(Lee, 2019).
Scope and Limitation
       This Study will be conducted at Oquendo National High School for the school
year (2024-2025). It aims to examine the impact of the Science, Technology, and
Engineering (STE) program on the academic achievement of Grade 7 students,
focusing on both its positive and negative effects. The study will explore how the
program influences students’ learning experiences and academic performance. The
respondents will be selected Grade 7 students enrolled in the STE program, and data
will be collected through observations and interviews to gain insights into their
academic progress and experience. However, this study has certain limitations. It is
limited to Grade 7 students only, excluding other year levels. The focus will be on
academic achievement based on grades and student feedback, without considering
external factors such as family background or learning environment. Additionally, the
findings may not be generalizable to other schools offering the STE program due to
differences in its implementation. Despite these limitations, the study aims to provide
valuable insights into the effectiveness of the STE program and its role in shaping
students' academic success.
Statement of the Problem
       The Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) program is a specialized
designed to enhance students’ knowledge and skills in STEM fields. While the
program aims to improve academic achievement, it is crucial to investigate its actual
impact on the academic performance of students, particularly in the context of
Oquendo National High School.
“Specifically, It sought answers to the following questions:”
 1. What is the Demographic profile of respondents in terms of;
       1.1 age
       1.2 gender
       1.3 general Weighted Average
2. What are the perceptions of Grade 7 students at Oquendo National High School
regarding the STE program?
3. How does the academic achievement of Grade 7 students enrolled in the STE
program at Oquendo National High School compare to that of students in the regular
curriculum?
4.. What are the challenges and opportunities encountered by Grade 7 students and
teachers in the implementation of the STE program at Oquendo National High
School?
5. What recommendations can be formulated to enhance the effectiveness of the STE
program in improving the academic achievement of Grade 7 students at Oquendo
National High School?
Statement of Hypothesis Assumption
H1. There is a statistically significant relationship between participation in the STE
program and the academic performance of Grade 7 students at Oquendo National
High School.
H2a. (POSITIVE RELATIONSHIP) There is a statistically significant positive
relationship between participation in the STE program and the academic performance
of Grade 7 students at Oquendo National High School.
H1b. (NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIP) There is a statistically significant negative
relationship between participation in the STE program and the academic performance
of Grade 7 students at Oquendo National High School.
Statement of Null Hypothesis
HO1. There is no statistically significant relationship between participation in the STE
program and the academic performance of Grade 7 students at Oquendo National
High School.
Conceptual Framework
1. Demographic                      Conduct survey through
profile in terms of:                giving survey
                                    questionnaire to the
1.1 age
                                    respondents after giving
1.2 gender
                                    the questionnaire to the
1.3 general Weighted
                                    respondents, we need to             Impact of the STE
Average
                                    wait for them to
                                                                        program on Academic
                                    complete it.
2. What are the                                                         Achievement of grade 7
                                    1. collect responses
perceptions of Grade 7                                                  Students of Oquendo
                                    2. organize data
students at Oquendo                                                     National High School
                                    3. clean data
National High School
                                    4. analyze responses
regarding the STE
                                    5. draw conclusions
program?
                                    6. report findings
          Proposed program that can improve the Impact of the STE program on
          Academic Achievement of grade 7 Students of Oquendo National High School
                             Fig 1, The paradigm of the study
       In figure 1 it shows the demographic profile of the respondents, in the second
part it will be focusing in the What are the perceptions of Grade 7 students at
Oquendo National High School regarding the STE program?, this questionnaire will
be given to the respondents of this study, the research will conduct a survey to
identify the Impact of the STE program on Academic Achievement of grade 7
Students of Oquendo National High School
       In the second box researchers was conduct a survey through giving survey
questionnaire to the respondents for the answers that the researchers are aiming to get
to know the result of the study. On the third box shows that the researchers are aiming
to identify. Also, the researchers suggested to came up some programs to improve the
STE program on Academic Achievement of grade 7 Students of Oquendo National
High School. Researchers suggested that having a program about the financial
capability and its impact to academic performance can help students to gain more
knowledge on how to improve the Impact of the STE program on Academic
Achievement of grade 7 Students of Oquendo National High School.
Definition of Terms
Academic Performance: A measure of a student’s success in educational activities,
typically assessed through grades, test scores, and overall achievement and various
subjects, including those related to STEM.
Engagement: The level of interest, enthusiasm, and involvement that students show
towards their learning activities. High engagement often correlates with better
academic outcomes and positive attitude toward education.
Instrument- Refers to the tools or methods used to collect data in this study. This
may include surveys, questionnaires, interviews, or assessment test designed to
measure the academic performance, engagement, and social skills for Grade 7
students participating in the STE program.
Social Skills: Abilities that facilitate interaction and communication with others,
including cooperation, conflict resolution, and empathy. Social skills are critical for
collaboration in group settings, often emphasized in STEM education.
Students: Students who are typically 12to 13 years old and are in the seventh grade of
their education, often characterized by a transition in cognitive and social
development, where they begin to take on more complex subjects and responsibilities.
                                     CHAPTER II
            REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
        This chapter presented the Review of related literature utilized in this study.
This chapter will cover all aspects concerning the overall data in the research. This
includes the local and foreign study with the similarities and differences of study.
REVIEW RELATED LITERATURE
Foreign literature
       Observations over the positive and negative effects of the STE program to
Grade 7 students and the article of Becker and Park (2011) about the effect of
integrated STEM education both discuss their respective impacts of such educational
programs to the performance of the students. Thus, these studies pinpoint that, by way
of STEM-based learning strategies, the outcomes of learning may be altered. By good
implementations of STEM-based programs, the performance of students would be
enhanced, according to the said studies. However, their scope and approach vary. The
STE program research specifically directs its focus to the effects of the program on
Grade 7 students, weighing both its positive and negative aspects: better
understanding and possible challenges. Becker and Park, on the other hand, present a
meta-analytic approach that encompasses a more general perspective with many
different integrated STEM education programs analyzed to illustrate the universal
effectiveness of interdisciplinary approaches in the achievement of students. While
the STE research is grade and program specific, Becker and Park synthesize findings
from multiple STEM initiatives to conduct a more general evaluation of the impact of
STEM education on learning.
       The research will specifically focus on the direct impacts of a structured
program among Grade 7 students, consisting of positive outcomes - such as improved
understanding - and negative challenges which learners would undergo. In contrast,
Bybee's article is a more broad-theoretical focus of a platform to argue on the
necessary role of STEM education in preparing students for the demands of the 21st
century, discussing various educational strategies, and their possible long-term
impact. While STE research focuses on evaluating specific outcomes of program
implementation, Bybee pushes for a combination of education in STEM to be an
overarching approach for future-proofing students rather than settling on any single
program or grade level.
       While the article by Fitzgerald and Leahy (2020) is focused on the effect of
STE education on the critical thinking ability of students, the research on the
observation of the positive and negative effects of the STE program on Grade 7
students concerns how STE programs impact the development of students. While both
articles are more oriented towards the positive impact that STE education brings
towards the abilities of a student-be it on the enhancement of academic performance
or of critical thinking, their focus is different. The STE program research looks into
various broad effects on Grade 7 students, both positive and negative challenges that
happen to students. However, Fitzgerald and Leahy's article is the articulation of the
improvement that effective STE education makes upon one's ability to think critically
and concludes that well-designed programs do boost analytical and reasoning
capabilities within students in a much significant way. While the STE research
evaluates overall program effects, including any downsides, Fitzgerald and Leahy
focus on the cognitive benefits of STE education, such as promoting critical thinking.
       On one end, the two research studies focusing on how the STE program
affects Grade 7 students in both positive and negative ways, and Ritz and Fan's (2015)
article on interdisciplinary approaches in STE education discussed how STE
education impacts the outcome of students' learning. They both centered their scope to
how these STE programs enhance the engagement as well as understanding of
concepts for students. However, their scope and focus are somewhat different. The
study done on the STE program assesses the overall effects of the program to Grade
7-level students. Students are assessed whether they experienced the positive effects,
for example, better understanding or challenges or adverse effects that they incurred.
On the contrary, the Ritz and Fan article explores the benefits of interdepartmental
approaches about STE education. The article suggests that when two subjects are
combined, it yields greater engagement and a better understanding of more complex
ideas. Whereas STE research gives a general view of the impact of a single program,
Ritz and Fan center the value of interdisciplinary approaches within STE that have
been found to better facilitate more integrated learning.
       Both the paper discussing the positive and negative effects of the STE
program on Grade 7 students and Sadler's article, "STEM Education and Equity: an
Update, " relate to the broader implications of STEM education for students.
However, at the same time, they both acknowledge a seminal role for STEM
education in having an impact on the outcomes of students, be it in terms of
intellectual achievement or in terms of social justice. This description is where they
differ in focus and scope. The direct impacts of the STE program are studied through
its effects on Grade 7 students. That is, from the kinds of favorable results, such as
improved learning, to the sorts of adverse challenges that students encounter. Sadler's
article, however focuses on the social impacts of STEM education, and problems
about equity gaps opens up for underrepresented groups in STEM fields. That is,
whereas the immediate impact of STE research studies is focused on what educational
or academic gains bring to people, Sadler posits that STEM education brings socially
long-term impacts, especially focusing on a holistic approach toward inclusivity and
therefore equal opportunities amongst all.
       While it is imperative to observe the positive and negative impacts of the STE
program on Grade 7 students, Wang and Custer's 2015 article points out how
technology integration in STEM education impacts the learning outcomes of students.
Both highlight the positive roles of STE programs in raising the achievement of
students. For instance, while Wang and Custer discuss the effectiveness of
incorporating technology for enriching learning experiences, the current paper would
focus on observing such positive and negative impacts of the STE program on Grade
7 students. However, their emphasis is different. The study of the STE program
research centers on the general impact that the program has from the Grade 7
students, and it encompasses both positive outcomes, such as better understanding and
which challenges students may face, as negative outcomes. On the other hand, in
article by Wang and Custer, gives a kind of generalized overview of literature
referring to technology integration in STEM, laying down its efficiency across various
contexts and emphasizing how it enhanced the engagement and learning of students.
While the conclusions of STE research are very specific, as they take into account
being based on a focus on the impact of one program on one grade level, Wang and
Custer gave a comprehensive assessment of technology as applied in STEM education
in general, providing results from multiple studies instead of keeping the focus on one
case.
        Both the positive and negative effects of STE on Grade 7 students as well as
Baker's article on long-term effects of early STE education address the role that
STEM education plays in shaping student outcomes such as making career choices.
Its significance in early involvement in STE education towards successful and chosen
careers by students at a later date also makes this article central to its discussion.
However, their scope and focus are different. The research specifically undertaken in
the study of the STE program investigates the immediate effects of the program on
Grade 7 students, both positive impacts, such as the increased grasp of concepts, and
negativities one encounters while under the program. By contrast, Baker's article is
considered long view in the sense of surveying the long-run impact of early STE
education on career paths, so that early STEM has huge significant effects on
increasing both employment and further education chances in the same fields. As the
research on STE is based on students' experience within a specific program and the
immediate effects, Baker's study focused on the long-term influence of STE education
on career choice over time.
Local Literature
       Observing the positive and negative effects of the STE program in Grade 7
students and Alonzo's, (2020) article on "The impact of STEM education on the
critical thinking skills of students" share similarities but differ in some important
respects. Both studies are concerned with educational interventions that intend to
develop students' capabilities in any aspect of science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics. They are student-centered, targeting specifically Grade 7 students in the
research of the STE program, while Alonzo's article scopes its focus to the students in
general. The other works also discuss the issue of skill development, mainly on how
these programs affect students' capabilities. The range of these effects is covered by
the STE research, while Alonzo emphasizes improvements in critical thinking and
problem-solving as well as in analytical skills.
       Both research on looking at the positive and negative impacts of the STE
(Science, Technology, and Engineering) program on Grade 7 students and Bautista's
(2019) report about making students participate in STEM through project-based
learning focus on pedagogical approaches that improve student involvement in STEM
disciplines. Both demand the involvement of the students in the learning process,
whether through project-based or through STE programs, to make the motivation and
better understanding of their applications in the real world. They, however, both differ
in scope and focus. Bautista emphasizes how project-based learning is effective in
teaching and engaging learners besides motivating them to learn. The other research
published on the STE program evaluates the whole program from the positive effects
as well as the negative effects, that could address the student performance, attitude,
and what problem they face. The research on STE may embrace several instructional
methods and outcomes. However, in the paper, Bautista focuses on project-based
learning as the primary channel through which an improvement of STEM education
may be aspired.
       From the two articles, it can be concluded that the aspects affecting student
outcomes when observing the positive and adverse effects of the STE program among
Grade 7 students and Cruz's article, "Rural Difficulties in Implementing STEM
Education: A Case Study" where the author talks at length about the difficulties in
implementing STEM education in rural settings. Although the reports differ in focus,
both concur that the success or failure of a STEM program depends on the
environment and resources available in an educational setting. However, both
research studies have different focuses regarding their specificity. The study on the
STE program gives an analysis of its positive impacts as well as negative impacts for
the students probably basing the analysis on student performance, engagement, and
perception. In contrast, Cruz focused on the issues that rural schools face in
implementing STEM education, with special emphasis on external factors such as
limited resources, teacher training, and infrastructure. Although STE research centers
more on the direct impact of the program on students, Cruz's work answers broader
systemic challenges preventing the effective delivery of STEM education in rural
contexts.
       The research of STE programs focuses more on the internal impact of the
program itself on students, in addition to considering the advantages and
disadvantages of the program, which might comprise the effectiveness of curriculum
and experience of students. López's research tends to focus on the role of parents;
active involvement by parents has been associated with increased interest and
achievement by students in the area of STEM. Where the STE research is concerning
programmatic factors within school settings, López addresses problems concerning
family dynamics that would influence student performance and motivation toward
STEM education.
       Both works on observing the positive and negative impact of the STE program
on Grade 7 students and in Martinez's paper on the use of technology in STEM
teaching discuss improving the student learning experience about STEM education.
While both texts talk about factors that can strengthen or weaken student engagement
and performance, such as the general program design of the STE or even the role of
technology in education, their focus differed. The research on the influences of the
STE program studies an extremely broad scope of influence in students and
determines both the positive as well as negative dimensions of the program itself.
Contrarily, the article by Martinez focuses precisely on the role of technology,
debating how the inclusion of technology in teaching STEM improves learning
experiences and enhances digital literacy. Even if the STE research would cover
multiple aspects of the program affecting students, Martinez zeroes in on the
technological aspect with regard to how it is effective in enhancing STEM.
       While differing in their focus, both study on the positive and negative effects
of observing the STE program for Grade 7 students and Natividad's (2018) article on
gender differences in STEM participation focus on the factors that have an impact on
students' involvement and success in STEM fields. They both examine how certain
elements-whether it be programmatic or demographic-have an effect on varying
student engagement and performance rates. The general impacts of the program on
the students will consider both positive and negative outcomes like the way the
program influences student attitudes, skills, and achievements. Contrarily, Natividad's
article only specifically deals with gender differences in the participation of STEM,
noting that boys are often more interested and perform higher, thereby raising the
need to establish strategies aimed at encouraging more girls to participate in STEM.
Whereas STE focuses its research on the effectiveness of the program in general,
Natividad's study is more focused on the demographic aspect that specifically looks
into gender and inequalities in student participation with STEM.
       The research for both monitoring the positive and negative impacts of the STE
program on Grade 7 students and the article by Reyes entitled Exposing Students to
Extra-Curricular Activities: Studying the influence of ECs on the Interest of Students
in STEM, pointed out factors that influenced students' engagement and performance
in the STEM fields. They both placed an emphasis on the influence that the
educational program and activities can impact the interest and skills building of the
students in the STEM but each focus on different aspects and scopes. The STE
research program explores the general effects of a classroom-based program among
Grade 7 students based on positives and negatives, such as academic outcomes and
student difficulties. The article by Reyes is more aligned with after-class activities
based on extracurricular activities that could help the students become interested and
engage in STEM activities with their actual improvement. Where the STE is centered
on formal education in the classroom, a point Reyes makes is that informal learning
through extracurricular activities also has a role to play in developing passion for the
STEM discipline.
Literature of the Study
       The studies focus on observation of the positive and negative impacts of the
STE program on Grade 7 students, as well as the role of parental involvement in
STEM education by López (2021), which expounds on factors that influence student
outcomes in STEM-related disciplines. Both studies establish how external
influences, through design of a program or involvement of parents, impact outcomes
such as interest and achievement in students. This study monitoring the positive and
negative impacts of the STE program on Grade 7 students and Dela Cruz's 2022
article on the perception of the teachers about STEM education in the Philippines,
highlighted elements that determine the effectiveness of the implementation of STEM
education. The two studies acknowledged that structures of support - training, for
example, as well as resources - would determine the success of the STEM programs
by enhancing learning engagement through the students. But on the other hand, their
approach is a bit different. This involves analyzing the positive outcomes as well as
problems the learners faced. Moreover, Dela Cruz focuses more on the approaches of
the teachers who underscore how it really matters for educators' preparation and
resource availability which is identified as critical to successful implementation of
STEM. Though the focus of the article on STE research is on students' experiences,
Dela Cruz writes about how teacher support and perceptions indirectly affect students
based on the quality of STEM instruction they get.
               Although both studies-as in observing the positive and negative effects
that the STE program may impact Grade 7 students and Santos's (2022) article on
how STEM education affects career selection-feasibly center on the influence of
education stemming from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics on the
learners themselves, as they both affect the way students' interests and future will
evolve with or due to exposure to such programs, their objects and scope are different.
The STE program research focuses directly on the effects that the program has on
Grade 7 students, highlighting the positive benefits, for example bettering their
understanding and negative factors such as problems which they might face.
Conversely, the long-run impact of STEM education in the course of shaping high
school students' career choices was seen by Santos in his article showing a positive
relation between early exposure to STEM with an increased interest in pursuing
STEM careers. While STE research places much attention on the effects of the
program during middle school, Santos accentuates the fact that STEM education
makes a difference to students' career aspirations as they approach higher education
and professional choices.
                                   CHAPTER III
                                 METHODOLOGY
        This chapter presents the research methodology utilized in this study. This
includes the (1) research design; (2) respondents of the study; (3) research
environment;(4) sampling procedures; (5) research instrument;(6) validation of
researcher instrument (7) locale of the study (8) data gathering procedure; (9)
statistical treatment of data.
Research Design
        The research design used in this study was a descriptive research design. This
design allowed the researchers to describe the effect of the STE Program on the
academic achievement of Grade 7 students at Oquendo National High School. The
study used quantitative data to assess students’ academic performance, engagement,
and social skills. The information gathered will help educators determine which
aspects of the program are effective and what may need improvement. This study
aims to provide valuable insights to enhance student learning and growth in the STE
field.
Respond of the Study
         The respondents of this study were Grade 7 students enrolled in the STE
program at Oquendo National High School. These students were selected as they are
directly affected by the STE curriculum, and their academic performance and
engagement levels were evaluated to determine the impact of the program.
Research Environment
         This study was conducted at Oquendo National High School, specifically
focusing on Grade 7 students who are part of the STE program. The school provides a
structured learning environment that integrates Science, Technology, and Engineering
subjects, making it an ideal setting for this research.
Population and Sampling
          The researchers used a descriptive sampling survey procedure, ensuring that
all respondents were Grade 7 STE students at Oquendo National High School. A
purposive sampling method was applied, selecting only students enrolled in the STE
program to ensure the study directly measures its impact.
Research Instrument
           The research instrument that was used in this study was a survey
questionnaire. The questionnaire was composed of two parts: the first part was
gathering information about the respondents such as, name, age, gender, grade level,
and strand. The second part focused on the What are the perceptions of Grade 7
students at Oquendo National High School regarding the STE program. The
respondents had to check on the column where: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral,
Agree, or Strongly Agree.
Locale of the Study
          The study was conducted in Oquendo National High School, located in
Oquendo District, Calbayog City, Samar. The study specially focused on Grade 7
students enrolled in Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) program during the
second semester of school year 2024-2025.
Data Gathering Procedure
      The data gathering procedure commenced with obtaining ethical approval from
the school administration and ensuring informed consent from the participants.
Following this, the researcher distributed the survey questionnaire to the respondents,
provide and clear instructions and emphasized the voluntary and confidential nature
of their participation. Additionally, the researcher addressed any queries or concerns
raised by the respondents during the questionnaire administration. Adequate time was
allocated to the respondents to ensure thoughtful and accurate completion of the
questionnaire. Moreover, anonymity and confidentiality of the respondents' responses
was strictly maintained throughout the data collection process to encourage candid
and unbiased feedback. Finally, periodic follow-ups were conducted to ensure
maximum participation and data integrity.
Statistical treatment of data
       The researchers used the Slovin’s formula to calculate the sample size
necessary to achieve a certain confidence interval when sampling a population. If a
sample was taken from a population, formula must be used to taken into account
levels and margins.
       Given:
       n = sample size
       N = population size
       e = margin of error
       Formula:
          n = N/1+Ne²
The following statistical tools was used in analyzing the data.
              Frequency counts and percentage was used to determine the
               demographic profile of the respondents.
              Mean was used in the assessment in Grade 7 Students in Oquendo
               National High School.
              The descriptive sampling technique was used to get the respondents in
               every classroom.
                                    CHAPTER IV
                  Presentation, analysis, and Interpretation data
       This chapter include the presentation, analysis, and interpretation of data that
are employed in the conduct of this study.
Demographic profile of the respondents
       PART 1: The respondent’s demographic profile was determined in terms of
age, gender, (GWA) general and weighted average of the respondents of the study.
Junior High School students in terms of the effect of the STE Program.
                                       Table 1.1
       Gender                  Frequency                 Percentage
        Male
       Female
        total
      Indicators               Frequency                Percentage
    15 -18 years old
   19 – 22 years old
22 and above years old
         Total
       Frequency and percentage of the Demographic profile of the respondents in
Oquendo National High School in terms of Age, Gender, General and Weighted
Average (GWA).
Table (1) shows the demographic data of the respondents: in terms of their age, there
were 132 respondents in 15 – 18 years old which represent ( 76.3% ) of the
respondents, 33 respondents in 19 – 22 years old which represent ( 19.1 % ) and 8
respondents in 22 above years old which represent ( 4.62% ) of the respondents
In terms of the respondents gender, there were 82 males which represents ( 47.4% )
and 91 Females which represent ( 52.6% ) gender of the respondents.
  General and Weighted
   Average ( GWA )                Frequency                 Percentage
         75 – 80
         80 – 85
         85 – 90
        91 above
          Total
In terms of the respondent General and Weighted Average ( GWA ), there were 7
respondents in 75 – 80 average which represent ( 4.05% ), 46 respondents in 80 – 85
average which represent ( 27% ), 81 respondents in 85 – 90 average which represent
(46.82%),and 39 respondents in 91 above average which represent ( 22.54% )
Of the respondents.
                                      Table II
REFERENCES
Çepni, S. (2017). STEM education from practice to theory. Ankara: Pegem
publishing.
DeBoer, George W (2011). The globalization of science education. Retrieved on
March 13, 2025 from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tea.20421
Dinçer, H. (2014). STEM education, and labor force. Journal of TÜSİAD, 85, 10-11.
Kazu, İ. Y., & Kurtoğlu Yalçın, C. (2021). The effect of STEM education on
academic performance: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology, 20(4), 101–116.
Lee, J. (2019). Attitudes of Science, Technology and Engineering (STE) students and
science teachers of LIS toward research. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research Abstracts, 3(2M).
Thomas, T. A. (2014). Elementary teachers’ receptivity to integrated science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in the elementary
grades. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.