Innovation U1
Innovation U1
This document is confidential and intended solely for the educational purpose of
RMK Group of Educational Institutions. If you have received this document
through email in error, please notify the system manager. This document
contains proprietary information and is intended only to the respective group /
learning community as intended. If you are not the addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy through e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this document by mistake and delete
this document from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contentsof this information is strictly prohibited.
21CB404 : INTRODUCTION TO INNOVATION, IP MANAGEMENT
&
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
BATCH/YEAR: 2025/II
DATE:09.02.2023
Tableof Contents
S.No. TITLE
1 Contents
2 Course Objectives
5 Course outcomes
16 Assessment Schedule
UNIT I INNOVATION 9
Innovation, Types of Innovation Incremental, disruptive, Lifecycle of
Innovation (idea, literature survey, PoT, PoC, etc.) , Challenges in
Innovation (time, cost, data, infrastructure, etc.)
UNIT II IPR 9
Types of IPR (patents, copyrights, trademarks, GI, etc.) Lifecycle of IP
(creation, protection, assetization, commercialization), Balancing IP Risks
and Rewards (Right Access and Right Use of Open Source and 3rd party
products, technology transfer and licensing)
UNIT III ENTREPRENEURSHIP 9
Opportunity Identification in Technology Entrepreneurship (customer pain
points, competitive context) Market Research, Segmentation and Sizing
Product Positioning, Pricing, and Go-To-Market Strategy IP Valuation
(methods, examples, limitations)
UNIT IV TYPES OF STARTUP BUSINESS MODEL 9
Startup Business Models (fund raising, market segments, channels, etc.)
Coinnovation and Open Innovation (academia, startups, corporates)
Technology Innovation: Two Case Studies
UNIT V PROCESSES IN STARTUP BUSINESS MODEL 9
Innovation, Incubation and Entrepreneurship in Corporate Context
Technology-driven Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship Manage
Innovation, IP and Entrepreneurship Programs – Processes, Governance
and Tools
5. Course Outcomes
CO2
Manage an innovation program
CO3 Create, protect, assetize and commercialize
intellectual property
Understand opportunities and challenges for
CO4
entrepreneurs
Developing mindsets to pursue
CO5
entrepreneurship
CO6 Identify and discover market needs
6. CO-PO/CO-PSO MAPPING
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
CO1 - - - - - 2 - 1 1 1 2 2
CO2 - - - - - 2 - 1 1 1 2 2
CO3 - - - - - 2 - 1 1 1 2 2
CO4 - - - - - 2 - 1 1 1 2 2
CO5 - - - - - 2 - 1 1 1 2 2
CO6 - - - - - 2 - 1 1 1 2 2
No
S. Actual Taxono
Topics to be of Proposed Pertai my level Mode of
N Lecture
covered Peri date n ing Delivery
o Date
ods CO
3.01.24 3.01.24 BLACK
1 1 BOARD &
CO1
Innovation K2 PPT
& CO2
4.01.24 4.01.24 BLACK
2 1 CO1 BOARD &
Types of Innovation K2 PPT
& CO2
5.01.24 5.01.24
3 1 BLACK
CO1 BOARD &
Incremental K2 PPT
& CO2
6.01.24 6.01.24 BLACK
4 1 BOARD &
CO1
Disruptive K2 PPT
& CO2
8.01.24 8.01.24
5 1 BLACK
Lifecycle of CO1 BOARD &
Innovation K3 PPT
& CO2
9.01.24 9.01.24 BLACK
6 1 CO1 BOARD &
idea, literature survey K3 PPT
& CO2
10.01.24 10.01.24 BLACK
7 1 BOARD &
CO1
PoT, PoC, etc K3 PPT
& CO2
11.01.24 11.01.24 BLACK
8 1
Challenges in CO1 BOARD &
Innovation K3 PPT
& CO2
12.01.24 12.01.24 BLACK
9 Time, cost, data, 1 CO1 BOARD &
infrastructure, etc. K3 PPT
& CO2
8. ACTIVITY BASED LEARNING
Topic : Innovation
Course Outcome : CO13&CO2
Program Outcome : PO6,PO8,PO9,PO10,PO11 & PO12
Time : 25-30 minutes
Size : Group 4-7
Aim: The Pos and Neg Grid involves , list of advantages and disadvantages about a suitable
issue related to Innovation, helping student to see a topic from different angles and to
develop skills in analysis and evaluation.
Activity:
1.Identify a topic in the lesson that is open-ended- suitable for discussion and debate - and
that will serve as an appropriate subject for building a list of advantages/disadvantages.
2.Divide students into groups and specify how many Pos and Neg would like each group to
come up with. Allow ten minutes for students to discuss and write down the list of Pos and
Neg
3.If Pos and Neg that are similar, then note it how many times they have appeared across
different groups to emphasize their importance.
4. Challenge to back up their Pos and Neg with research, evidence, and/or analysis.
5.Read the list to the class without disclosing the authors in order to stimulate
conversation.
6. Surprised at what misconceptions or assumptions students make about the subject.
Benefits:
Become engaged intellectually, emotionally, and socially
Take initiative, make decisions, and feel accountable for the results of the activity
Synthesize observations and reflections in a new way, opening up different
interpretations of course material
Learn from the natural consequences of group debate and discussion, opening a healthy
platform for dialogue where students feel they are allowed to make mistakes
2. Instant Test Questions
Topic : Incremental Innovation
Course Outcome : CO3&CO6
Program Outcome : PO6,PO8,PO9,PO10,PO11 & PO12
Size : 2-4
Aim: A student-generated test question to other participants and the opportunity to ask the
questions instead of just answering them.
Activity:
1. Students ask to prepare three to five test questions of their own related to topic.
2. Explain that, students must also create the related answers to the questions they
come up with.
3. After the allotted time, group the students into 2-4 and have them test each other
with the questions they have written.
4. If time permits, get students to share their results with the class.
Benefits:
Understand key concepts within a lesson
Consider to be reasonable and valuable test questions
Students have inaccurate expectations for an upcoming test
3.Back of the Chart
Topic : Proof of Concept (PoC)
Course Outcome : CO3&CO6
Program Outcome : PO6,PO8,PO9,PO10,PO11 & PO12
Size
: 4-8
Time : 10-20 minutes
Aim: To work together and solve problems creatively for Promoting unconventional
thinking and teamwork.
Activity
1. Come up with a bunch of open ended problems. These could be related to your
business, an imaginary product, an environmental problem, etc.
2. Divide all students into teams of 4 to 8 - basically, what you would see in a team of
start-up co-founders.
Activity:
1. Give each participant sheets of paper, markers, and tape.
2. Ask each participant to survey the room.
3. Take 15 minutes to write down positive memories of shared experiences
4.Once participants have a few memories listed, ask them to draw a few of these
memories on fresh sheets of papers.
5. The drawings can be abstract renditions of the "memory scene".
6.They can involve partners who've shared the memory to create this drawing. Give
them up to 30 minutes to do this.
7. Once the time is up, ask participants to tape their memory drawings to the Board.
8.Ask for volunteers to approach the board and expand on the memories they just
taped on the board with all Participants.
Benefits:
Creates a welcoming environment and positive relationships between participants.
Rendering each memory individually as a drawing adds much-needed humor and
friendship to the whole exercise.
9. LECTURE NOTE
Unit –I INNOVATION
What is Innovation
Types of Innovation
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) highlights two
different types of innovation:
innovations that change the firm’s products (product innovations)
innovations that change the firm’s business processes (business process
innovations).
A business process innovation can significantly improve the quality of a product, resulting
in a joint business process and product innovation
The minimum requirement for an innovation is that the product or business process must
have one or more features that were not made available in the products or business
processes in the previously offered by or used by the firm. The enhanced features must
be relevant to the organization or to external users.
For example, the organization may expect the new or improved characteristics of a
product (or business process) to increase usefulness for users or to enhance its own
competitive position in the market
Categories of Innovation
The types of innovation (product and business process) are categorized by novelty or
economic impacts. For example, introducing a new flat screen television is a major
change to the older established television market. However just enhancing the resolution
of the screen is a minor change. The three categories are Incremental, Radicaland
Disruptive.
Incremental innovation is about continuous improvement making small changes to
products, processes or services. It increases value to the customer (features, design
changes, etc.) or creates possibility of making small changes to revenue or efficiency or
both. The risk of introducing incremental innovation is low.
Radical innovation is about making major changes in using revolutionary technology
and new business model. It has potential positive impact on enterprise’s performance
such as revenue or efficiency. It inherits high level of risk, high cost of failure and
focuses on long-term impact. It may displace current products.
Disruptive innovation make product and services more accessible, affordable, and
availableto a larger users. Disruptive innovations originate in low-end footholds or new-
market footholds.
Disruptive Innovation: Explained
To be disruptive, a disrupter must first gain acceptance in the low end of the market.
This sector is generally not given importance by the enterprises who are established in
the market and holds profitable high-end customers.
–For example, with the advent streaming technology over internet, Netflix was able to
offer on-demand movies and TV to a large customer base at cost-effective price and thus
able to grow the business exponentially. It was the initial focusing on the low-end of the
market that made Netflix disruptive. Gaining a low-end foothold and with a completely
different business model allowed Netflix to move upmarket and in due course attract
Blockbuster’s core customers
Low-end footholds
Incumbents provide attention to their most profitable and demanding customers with
enhanced products and services and give low priority to less-demanding customers.
Disrupter may target those low-end customers by providing with a “good
enough” product and later move up across customer profile as the product
acceptance improves
New-market footholds
Disrupter creates a market where none existed
Disrupter finds a way to turn non consumers into consumers.
‘Jugaad Innovation’ means improvised solution using limited resources (The word
‘Jugaad’ originates from Hindi). JugaadInnovation has the following three core aspects:
Faster: They don’t use pre-planned, detailed R&D processes. But rely majorly on rapid
prototyping techniques. They collaborate closely with customers and use their constant
feedback to develop relevant product features
–e.g. Jane Chen and Rahul Panicker, founders of Embrace social enterprise specializing
in infant healthcare, designed portable infant warmer by interacting with village
pediatricians, midwives, nurses, and parents
Cheaper: They are very frugal. Rather than reinventing the wheel or spending huge
money on R&D projects, they develop new solutions by reusing existing infrastructure
and assets
–e.g. YES Bank, one of India’s leading private banks, has deployed mobile banking
application that enables users to transfer money via mobile phone without the need for
a bank account. This solution takes advantage of India’s existing mobile telephony
infrastructure that extends to the remote villages in India
Better: They develop solutions that are affordable and deliver superior quality catering
to consumers who are low earners
–e.g. SELCO, an Indian renewable energy firm, developed solar lanterns to rural
customers that are affordable
Inventions & IP
For an offering to succeed in the market there needs to be one or more novelty
attributed to it
This gives rise to potential inventions and hence IP that needs protection (IPR). An
IP may have a lifecycle of its own.
End of Life
The Ideas, Impact of the ideas and Growth starts getting to be insignificant –
impacting the interest of the organization, customer and investors to continue with
the product. The potential attributable reasons:
Economic viability goes down
Loss of relevance as a solution
Technology substitution
Loss of market space, demand
No more leading the solution space
An important aspect that needs to be tracked and recorded though an offering’s life
is the impacts it has created that leads to learning and insight to create more
ventures
Economic–How did it impact the market, how was it impacted by the market, How
was the organization impacted
Social–What was the social impact (e.g., Pollution reduction, improvement in
sanitation)
Technology–Did it spawn new technologies, new technical processes
What is the purpose of a literature review?
When you write a thesis, dissertation, or research paper, you will have to conduct a
literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature
review gives you a chance to:
• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. In this
case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your
knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic.
The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a
literature review follows the same steps.
Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for
graduate school or pursue a career in research.
Step 1: Search for relevant literature
Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic.
If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you
will search for literature related to your research problem and questions.
If you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to
choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your search. Unlike a
dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without collecting
original data. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing
publications.
Step 2: Evaluate and select sources
You probably won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on the
topic—you’ll have to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your questions.
For each publication, ask yourself:
• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
•What are the key theories, models and methods? Does the research use established
frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
•How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to,
or challenge established knowledge?
• How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic? What are its
key insights and arguments?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?
Step 3: Identify themes, debates, and gaps
To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to
understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based
on your reading and notes, you can look for:
•Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches
become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the
direction of the field?
•Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be
addressed?
Step 4: Outline your literature review’s structure
There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. You should
have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing.
Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these
strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is
discussed chronologically).
Step 5: Write your literature review
Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction, a main
body, and a conclusion. What you include in each depends on the objective of your
literature review.
Introduction
The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.
Body
Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into
subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological
approach.
Conclusion
In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the
literature and emphasize their significance.
Challenges in Innovation
Sustaining an Innovative Offering requires a delicate balance of Ideas,
Investment and Market strategies.
Maintaining the balance is the challenge that exists across the lifecycle of an
innovation and can be broadly defined as challenges during the:
Ideation, Research stages (Ideas);
Offering, Commercialization stages (Investment);
Growth, Retirement stages (Market)
Challenges in Innovation: During Ideation and Research Stages
Managing the market leadership and credibility is a major challenge –No Market
Reasons
–Loss of Market connection: Understanding of changing customer needs and innovating
to keep abreast of futuristic trends
–Wrong measurement of success of offering: Continuous reliance on sales and profits as
a measure of success without focusing on number of ideas being generated, investments
(funding, time) on innovation-related initiatives, customer satisfaction, market share
–Not ensuring graceful retirement: Ensuring brand image of the organization is not
impacted by abrupt closure of the offering. Important to ensure customers interests are
properly managed
Scott Berkun 8 Challenges innovation
Find an idea. Historically this is easy. Ideas are everywhere and anyone who can consider a
problem for an hour can come up with possible ideas for solving it. Creativity is rarely the
hardest challenge.
Develop a solution. The gap between an idea and a working prototype is HUGE. So what if
you think something can be done, go and do it. Until you can show the manifestation of the
idea, it’s still just an idea. Thousands of brilliant minds have conceived brilliant ideas, but
failed, despite years of dedicated effort, to successfully prototype them.
Find a sponsor and funding. Even with a kick-ass prototype in hand you need resources
to develop the prototype into a product. Whether an entrepreneur or a middle-manager,
odds are good that to finish a prototype, or make a product out of it, you’ll need someone
else’s approval. (Even if it’s your wife’s permission to spend nights working, a friend who will
let you live in their basement, or a bartender willing to run you a tab).
Reproduction. Making one of something is not the same as making a thousand. I happen
to have an amazing mousetrap: his name is Vincent and he’s my 15lb cat. But I can only sell
one, as cloning him would cost $50,000 and that’s more than anyone would pay for a good
mousetrap. Having an innovation and having an innovation than can be reproduced
economically are not the same thing. Software is generally easy to reproduce, but many
innovations are not. When it comes to the web, reproduction often means scale: can your
server handle 50000 people using your innovation at the same time? This is a different
technical skill set than creating the prototype.
Reach a customer. This is where the skill set required to make a successful innovation
changes dramatically. OK. So you’ve overcome the first four challenges – but now the
challenge has nothing to do with domain expertise, prototype brilliance, or even funding.
Now someone has to inform potential customers that your innovation exists, persuade them
to be interested, and convince them to pay money for it. Wow. What does this have to do
with breakthrough thinking or a brilliant prototype? Very little. Those things help, but the
challenge is now about persuasion, not creation. Up until this challenge, most
innovators are deliberately hiding from the world in fear of idea theft, but now they have run
in the opposite direction.
Beat competitors. Every idea has competitors. Even if you successfully reach customers,
you won’t be the only one trying to reach them, and in the pursuit of customers things get
ugly. Thomas Edison, in the war over electricity, tortured animals to convince the world his
DC current was safer than Westinghouse’s AC (they were equally dangerous). How to
position, advertise, make partnerships, sign deals and distribute a product is complex,
unpredictable, and has little to do with the quality of the idea being sold.
Timing. This is the challenge that crushes innovators souls. A huge number of things can
happen on any of your important days that a) decides your fate and b) you have no control
over. Imagine what happened to all the start-up companies that announced their new
product to the world on Sept 11, 2001. No one knows their names, and many of those
companies did not have the resources to stage another launch. WWII had a huge impact on
innovation: many ideas that weren’t war related were mothballed for years, including
broadcast television in the USA. Timing impacts product launches, business deals, cost of
goods, and dozens of other decisions innovations depend on.
Keep lights on. And of course, while you’re doing all of the above, someone has to pay the
bills and keep whatever daily business there is running.
THE HIDDEN BARRIERS TO INNOVATION – KEY OBSTACLES TO
INNOVATION
Template:
Template:
AIM
The technological innovation systems (TIS) framework is one of the key
approaches in sustainability transition studies. An ideal TIS life cycle
representation is suggested and three empirical examples of long-term
TIS development and decline are discussed. It is argued that adopting a
TIS life cycle perspective opens up important new issues for
sustainability transition studies. One such issue is directing attention to
technology decline and the role of public policies therein.
3. Title :Building a proposal
Course Outcome :CO3
4 Explain the purpose and Steps of Literature survey in K3 CO1 & CO2
Innovation
5 Write Short notes on a) PoC b)PoT c)MVP d)Prototype K3 CO1 & CO2
6 Explain the need and benefit of Proof of Concept K3 CO1 & CO2
Duration: 15 weeks
Link : https://onlinecourses.swayam2.ac.in/imb21_mg04/preview
2. Online course:Udemy
Link : https://www.udemy.com/course/innovative-growth-strategy-a-
beginners-guide/
Autonomous Vehicles: Autonomous vehicle (AV) is the hottest topic in this industry to
provide major help to citizens. Multiple hi-tech giants are aiming at manufacturing
autonomous vehicles across the world. AV is capable of sensing the nearby environment and
driving on its own without any human driver on the driver’s seat. It can go anywhere like a
classical car after entering the destination. It is very useful for senior citizens to have
freedom and independence to roam around in the city.
Collaborative Robots: Collaborative robots or cobots are thriving in this industry with
their smart functionalities such as machine loading, machine tending, inspection, assembly in
productions, and many more efficiently and effectively. Cobots tend to work with human
employees to enhance outcomes, consistency, flexibility, and support without any potential
error.
Machine Vision: Machine vision is known as a key technology for optimizing different
processes in value chain including quality assurance, production, logistics, and many more.
The automobile industry is leveraging machine vision for unambiguous object detection,
accelerating existing production processes, eliminating potential errors or risks, and so on. It
has high speed where the algorithms need milliseconds to detect, analyze, and process
sufficient data from images.
Automated Guided Vehicles: Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) have started providing
multiple benefits to the automobile industry such as reduction in direct labour cost,
eliminating workforce shortage, removing potential errors, limiting heavy goods handling,
scalability, enhancing productivity, ensuring better safety, and many more. AGVs are known
for carrying assembly lines while being forklift-sized wheeled carts to use software in
navigating their movements efficiently and effectively.
Driver Monitoring System: Driver monitoring system is emerging as one of the top AI
innovations for alerting drivers during drowsiness, distraction, and so on to avoid fatal road
accidents. It is also known as a driver state sensing that utilizes a driver-facing hi-tech
camera with infrared LEDs on the dashboard to track the eye movements of drivers. There is
advanced on-board software that collects the data and creates an initial baseline of the
normal active driver. It analyzes whether the driver is blinking more, feeling dizzy, narrowing
the eyes, and other eye movements to issue audio alerts to keep him alert.
2. Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology
The varied definitions used in the sources that have been discussed make any aggregate
analysis difficult. A simple three-stage analysis of flows to, from, and within the firm was
used to facilitate comparisons. Even so, each of the generalizations is drawn from
relatively small and unrepresentative samples. Case studies may continue to be a source
of ideas and hypotheses for further research, but do not appear to offer a means for
deeper understanding of the innovation process. The retrospective nature of nearly all of
the sources discussed probably means that the process has been viewed as much more
rational and well-ordered than it is in fact. This failing is partially overcome in firsthand
accounts such as those of Suites and Bueche and Frey and Goldman. Each of these
accounts involves a successful innovation according to technical or commercial criteria,
or both. However, many of the characteristics of innovations that have failed
commercially appear to be similar to those of successful cases. The few longitudinal
studies, and studies comparing more and less successful cases, do support the main
conclusions drawn above.
More serious problems are raised by the distinctly nonrepresentative nature of the
samples used. There are few cases in which the contributions of more than one
organization, or details of interactions over a significant period of time, are discussed.
There is a wide variation in the importance of the innovations included, ranging from
those affecting the economy as a whole to cases involving production in a single firm,
albeit with significant commercial results.
In addition to questions of comparability and sampling, a central problem for further
research on innovation will be to devise an operational model to account for interfirm
and interindustry differences. Polar definitions used in past studies, "high technology"
and "mature industry," for example, are insufficient.
One possibility is to use the strategy for growth or competition evident in a firm or an
industry, such as sales maximization (automotive), cost minimization (transportation,
communications), performance maximization (aircraft, chemicals), or control of materials
resources (mining, petroleum), as a basis for drawing distinctions. For example, in an
industry that seeks to maximize sales, one would expect innovations that would be
highly visible to consumers to be developed rapidly. In a cost-minimizing situation,
production, as opposed to product technology, would be a major source of uncertainty,
while the reverse might be the case in a performance-maximizing situation. Greater
uncertainty arising from technical sources would imply greater sophistication in effective
firms' product planning approaches, while a more stable technology would imply greater
sophistication in market research and market-oriented strategies for innovation, and so
forth. Much more work is needed along these lines if outcomes of interventions in the
innovative process are to be predicted with any accuracy.
Some implications for providing incentives and reducing barriers do seem clear from the
work to date. Effective directions for federal action lie in strategies such as creating new
markets through purchases or procurement policies; aggregating or focusing markets
through regulation and other means; providing for market entry by contracts to smaller
firms, venture capital, stronger patent protection, and so on; and providing for mobility
and informal contacts within the technical community. Technology "push" strategies
(such as tax incentives) to increase most research spending, prizes for new technology,
and documentation and information retrieval systems would probably be less important
in stimulating innovation.
15.CONTENT BEYOND SYLLABUS
Refer: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296317305246
Refer : https://www.innovativedigitalmarketing.in/
2. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/entrepreneurship
3.https://www.infoentrepreneurs.org/en/guides/use-innovation-to-
grow-yourbusiness/
4. http://sourcesofinsight.com/innovation-life-cycle/
5. https://www.investottawa.ca/
6. https://www.Lead-innovation.com
18. MINI PROJECT SUGGESTIONS
Aim: Participants will be able to: - Review the Grant application and process - Review the
eligibility of the grant - Review the criteria for evaluation - Develop steps and strategies in
writing an effective grant focusing on each component - Engage in questions and answers
Duration : 2 Months
Aim: Participants will be able to: - Review the Grant application and process - Review the
eligibility of the grant - Review the criteria for evaluation - Develop steps and strategies in
writing an effective grant focusing on each component - Engage in questions and answers
Duration : 2 Months
3. Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Startup Grant for Content Writing
Aim: Participants will be able to: - Review the Grant application and process - Review the
eligibility of the grant - Review the criteria for evaluation - Develop steps and strategies in
writing an effective grant focusing on each component - Engage in questions and answers
Duration : 2 Months
4. Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Startup Grant for Start freelancing
Aim: Participants will be able to: - Review the Grant application and process - Review the eligibility of
the grant - Review the criteria for evaluation - Develop steps and strategies in writing an effective grant
focusing on each component - Engage in questions and answers
Duration
: 2 Months
5. Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Startup Grant for Home BakingBusiness
Aim: Participants will be able to: - Review the Grant application and process - Review the eligibility of
the grant - Review the criteria for evaluation - Develop steps and strategies in writing an effective grant
focusing on each component - Engage in questions and answers
Duration
: 2 Months
Disclaimer:
This document is confidential and intended solely for the educational purpose of RMK Group of
Educational Institutions. If you have received this document through email in error, please notify the
system manager. This document contains proprietary information and is intended only to the
respective group / learning community as intended. If you are not the addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy through e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you
have received this document by mistake and delete this document from your system. If you are not
the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
reliance onthe contents of this informationis strictly prohibited.
Thank you