NAME – KHYATI KOTHARI

ROLL NUMBER - 4
1.INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL ECONOMY

The concept of the digital economy, which emerged in the 1990s, has evolved alongside technological
advancements to include a broad range of digital technologies, products, and services spanning across
various sectors of economy. Collaborative research by Huawei and Oxford Economics estimated the
global digital economy to be valued at around US$11 trillion, constituting 15.5% of the global GDP in
2016. The projections suggest that it could reach US$23 trillion, equivalent to 24.3% of global GDP,
by 2025. The Asian Development Bank has proposed a framework for measuring the digital economy,
which identifies backward and forward linkages associated with core digital products comprising of
hardware, software publishing, web publishing, telecommunications services, and specialized and
support services. The digital economy is defined as the contribution of economic transactions involving
both digital products and digital industries to GDP or GVA.

Digital products are goods and services primarily involved in generating, processing, and/or storing
digitized data. ADB's framework distinguishes between the core digital economy and digitally enabling
and enabled products. Digitally enabling products represent the backward linkages of the core digital
economy, while digitally enabled products denote forward linkages. For instance, semiconductors,
although integral to computer manufacturing, do not directly interact with digitized data but are crucial
for its processing. Conversely, digitally enabled products, such as cars, incorporate digital components
like in-car entertainment and self-driving capabilities. In India, industries with significant forward
linkages from the aggregate core digital economy in 2019 included construction, renting of machinery
and equipment, food beverages and tobacco, textiles and textile products, and electrical and optical
equipment, according to the RBI. (Srivastava, 2023)

2.DIGITAL ECONOMY OF INDIA

According to the RBI, India's core digital economy's share of GVA increased from 5.4% in 2014 to
8.5% in 2019, exhibiting a growth rate of 15.6% in US dollar terms over the same period, outpacing
overall economic growth. The digitally dependent economy, encompassing digitally enabled sectors,
accounted for 22.4% of the economy in 2019. RBI's analysis also reveals changes in output multipliers,
with the digital multiplier increasing from 1.34 to 1.50 between 2014 and 2019, indicating the growing
impact of digital sectors on the economy. The India Stack initiative, initiated in 2015, has been
instrumental in driving digital transformation in the country. Starting with the Aadhaar identity system,
India Stack has evolved into a comprehensive framework, harnessing the power of technologies like
artificial intelligence and language models .
Both the value and volume of digital payments in India have experienced significant growth with the
number of digital transactions increasing from 300 crores in November 2019 to 1,052 crores by January
2023, more than tripling in this period. According to a recent study conducted by ACI Worldwide in
collaboration with GlobalData, India surpasses even China in terms of the number of digital payments.
The study indicates that in 2021, India recorded 48.6 billion real-time payments, whereas China
reported 18.5 billion and Brazil 8.7 billion. (Srivastava, 2023)

The Indian government initiated the 'Digital India' campaign in July 2015 to establish a secure digital
infrastructure, delivering digital services, and ensuring widespread internet access for all citizens.
Through these efforts, the government has bridged the gap between citizens and government services,
facilitating transparent and corruption-free service delivery. Since the launch of Digital Public
Infrastructure (DPI) in 2015, the entire allocated amount by the government, amounting to over 400
billion dollars in the last five years, reaches beneficiaries directly without any leakages (Ministry of
Electronics & IT, 2023). A study by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology estimates
India's digital economy at US$200 billion in 2019, projected to reach US$500 billion by 2025 under
current conditions. With the impending introduction of 5G technology and the establishment of
semiconductor industries, India is anticipated to further accelerate its digitalization trajectory in the
coming decades. Moreover, between the period of 2011 and 2019, the compound annual growth rate in
the Information and Communication Technology sector reached 10.6% in India, with its close rival
being only China in terms of growth.
Furthermore, India has the potential for substantial further growth, with the possibility of expanding to
US$1 trillion by implementing a comprehensive set of policy initiatives across various sectors, as
outlined in their strategic plan covering 30 digital themes under nine national goals. These initiatives
include upgrading IT infrastructure, enhancing e-governance, improving healthcare and education
accessibility, promoting renewable energy, modernizing financial services, boosting agriculture,
fostering domestic manufacturing, and investing in future skills and employment opportunities.
However, despite the rapid growth of India's digital economy, employment opportunities in digital
sectors remain relatively limited. Based on India's population in 2022 and the worker population ratio
from the Periodic Labour Force Survey in 2019-20, it's estimated that the total number of employed
workers in the core digital economy stands at 4.9 million. Among digital sectors, computer
programming consultancy and related activities account for the highest share of employment at 59.8%,
followed by telecommunication services at 15.2%. (Srivastava, 2023)

3.REGULATORY CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS IN DIGITAL ECONOMY

Navigating the regulatory landscape of India's digital economy presents complex challenges and policy
considerations, encompassing various legislative frameworks aimed at safeguarding consumer rights,
data protection, and privacy. The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, stands as a cornerstone in this
domain, seeking to regulate the processing and handling of personal data by entities operating within
the country. Complementing this legislation, the Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules, 2020, play
a vital role in ensuring consumer interests are protected in online transactions, offering mechanisms for
grievance redressal and dispute resolution. Additionally, regulations such as the Information
Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, introduce
guidelines for digital media intermediaries, emphasizing accountability and transparency in content
moderation practices.

Furthermore, the Reserve Bank of India's regulations governing digital payments, including the
Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and the regulations issued under it, contribute to ensuring
the security and efficiency of digital payment systems. However, amidst these regulatory efforts,
businesses encounter challenges such as compliance burdens, regulatory interpretation ambiguities, and
the necessity to balance innovation with regulatory requirements. Currently, the RBI is keen on
organizing self-regulatory bodies in the fintech industry so that they function responsible even without
formal regulations by a governing body. The dynamic nature of technology and digital business models
further underscores the need for continuous adaptation of regulatory frameworks to address emerging
challenges and uphold consumer rights and data privacy in the digital economy effectively.

The introduction of the Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules in 2020, along with the draft
amendments proposed in 2021, aimed to curb unfair trade practices and protect consumer rights.
However, the overlapping jurisdictions and lack of coordination between different government bodies
have further compounded regulatory uncertainty. The regulatory landscape for e-commerce in India is
shaped by various governmental bodies, each with its unique definitions and regulations, leading to a
complex environment for entities operating within this space. The Department for Promotion of
Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry oversees the
regulation of the e-commerce sector. Additionally, the Department of Consumer Affairs has established
rules to safeguard consumers participating in e-commerce, while the legal aspects fall under the purview
of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). The DPIIT has attempted to
address these issues through the drafting National E-Commerce Policy, proposing the creation of a new
e-commerce regulator to streamline regulations. However, the absence of progress since the policy's
draft in 2019 and subsequent media reports in 2020 has left businesses in limbo, holding back
investments due to regulatory uncertainties. (Gupta, 2022)

4.KEY REGULATIONS SHAPING INDIA'S DIGITAL ECONOMY: A COMPANY-CENTRIC

4.1.DATA PRIVACY CONCERNS IN DIGITAL FINANCE

Payments banks were established by the RBI to accommodate the burgeoning fintech sector in India,
with a focus on simplifying mobile banking and digital payments for customers. Payments banks, such
as Paytm Payments Bank, utilize secure digital platforms to offer a variety of services, including deposit
acceptance, bill payments, remittance, internet banking, and mobile banking, along with products like
mutual funds and insurance. Since obtaining "in-principle" approval from the RBI in 2015, Paytm has
become a major player in the payments sector, particularly through its mobile wallet feature, which has
played a significant role in shaping digital money transfers in India.

However, regulatory concerns have emerged regarding Paytm's operations. The RBI identified
"material" supervisory concerns within the bank, primarily relating to potential violations of data
privacy laws. These concerns include instances where Paytm's servers shared information with certain
China-based entities, raising questions about data privacy and security. Moreover, the bank was found
to have onboarded customers without adequate KYC documentation, raising concerns about potential
money laundering activities. Paytm's situation is further complicated by its ties to Chinese investors,
which has raised concerns amid the geopolitical tensions between India and China.

Under Section 35A of The Banking Regulation Act, 1949, RBI halted new customer enrolments and
mandated a thorough examination of Paytm's computer systems beginning March 2024. Additionally,
RBI fined Paytm Payments Bank Rs 5.39 crore for non-compliance with Know Your Customer
regulations and other specific guidelines. In response to the RBI's restrictions, Paytm is planning to
strengthen its ties with other banks and move away from its reliance on Paytm Payments Bank. These
regulatory concerns will have broader implications for the fintech industry, affecting payments, lending,
and other high-margin products, and potentially impacting banks' trust in fintech companies (AMA
Legal Solutions, 2024). Post Paytm, RBI is now scrutinizing companies providing peer-to-peer credit
card transactions services including Cred and NoBroker (Financial express, 2024).

Amidst India's evolving digital regulatory landscape, the RBI has now intensified its scrutiny over retail
lending practices, particularly focusing on mortgage-linked "top-up" loans and co-branded credit cards.
The RBI's four-step approach to supervision involves monitoring, warnings, penalties, and enforcement
actions, reflecting a proactive stance in addressing systemic risks (Kumar, 2024). Concerns over
excessive credit expansion have prompted the central bank to caution against algorithm-based credit
models and limit co-lending activities. These measures align with the RBI's broader objectives of
promoting financial stability and consumer protection in the digital economy. By mandating issuer
identification and data privacy safeguards for co-branded credit cards, RBI underscores its commitment
to responsible growth within the digital financial ecosystem. As India's digital regulatory framework
continues to evolve, collaboration between stakeholders and regulatory authorities will be essential to
navigate the changing landscape of retail lending and credit card issuance (Swati Bhat, 2024). However,
navigating India's complex regulatory landscape might prove challenging, with compliance burdens
diverting resources from innovation and growth initiatives. Furthermore, regulatory ambiguities and
frequent changes add to operational inefficiencies and costs.
4.2.REGULATION OF VIRTUAL DIGITAL ASSETS

The Indian government's approach toward cryptocurrencies has been marked by notable inconsistency,
creating a cloud of uncertainty for both industry stakeholders and consumers. This ambiguity primarily
arises from the absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework governing digital currencies. The
RBI first flagged its concerns about cryptocurrencies in 2013, cautioning the public about the risks.
This cautionary stance was reiterated in February 2017. By late 2017, both the Finance Ministry and
the RBI underscored that cryptocurrencies do not hold the status of legal tender in India, following
which two Public Interest Litigations were filed in the Supreme Court seeking clarity on the matter with
one calling for a complete ban and the other for regulation.

In a pivotal move, November 2017 saw the formation of an expert committee by the government to
draft cryptocurrency legislation, which initially did not advocate for a ban. Despite this, the RBI issued
a directive in 2018, effectively restricting banks from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions, leading
to a de facto ban. The expert committee later proposed a complete ban in the 'Banning of Cryptocurrency
and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2019'. However, this stance was challenged in the
Supreme Court, which in March 2020 overturned the RBI's restrictive directive, deeming it
disproportionate. In a seemingly contradictory turn of events in 2021, Finance Minister Nirmala
Sitharaman expressed an interest in banning cryptocurrencies in Parliament, only to later emphasize the
government's desire to encourage innovation within the crypto sector. This sentiment was echoed by
the Standing Committee on Finance, which advocated for regulation rather than an outright ban of
cryptocurrencies. The anticipated 'Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill,
2021', set to be discussed during the winter session of 2021, was not introduced.

Adding to the regulatory maze, the Union Budget of 2022 categorized cryptocurrencies as virtual digital
assets and introduced a 30% tax on their income, alongside a 1% TDS. However, this taxation stance
did not clarify the legal standing of cryptocurrencies in India. Throughout these developments, the RBI
has consistently favoured a ban on cryptocurrencies, citing potential threats to macroeconomic stability,
while simultaneously exploring the creation of its own digital currency.

This regulatory vacillation has had tangible consequences, compelling businesses to relocate to more
crypto-friendly jurisdictions, thereby exacerbating brain drain as Indian talent moves abroad in search
of greater regulatory clarity and stability. Instances like Polygon, a crypto-based startup, highlight the
industry's struggle with regulatory uncertainties in India. In response to the growing need for clear
guidelines, the Finance Ministry is reportedly preparing a consultation paper aimed at addressing crypto
assets, with plans to release it for public feedback. This move aligns with global efforts, particularly
among G20 countries, to achieve a consensus on the regulation of digital developments, including
crypto-assets, signaling a potential reduction in regulatory uncertainties. This complex narrative reflects
the challenges faced by policymakers in regulating emerging technologies like cryptocurrencies,
balancing the need for innovation with consumer protection and financial stability. (Gupta, 2022)

4.3.DIGITAL MEDIA AND E-COMMERCE REGULATORY CONCERNS

The regulatory efforts to tighten control over social media content in India began in 2021, and this
initiative has been ongoing for over a year. The government progressively introduced measures to hold
social media platforms accountable for the content shared on their platforms. The case began with the
Indian government's growing concerns over the spread of misinformation and objectionable content on
social media platforms, particularly during sensitive events such as the farmers' protests.

In response to instances where platforms like Twitter failed to comply with government directives to
remove specific content, the Modi administration initiated efforts to tighten regulation of social media
companies. This led to the formulation and announcement of the Intermediary Guidelines and Digital
Media Ethics Code, which aimed to make social media firms more accountable for the content shared
on their platforms. The government's actions were influenced by a desire to address challenges related
to online content moderation, safeguard citizens' rights, and ensure national security. The subsequent
implementation of these rules marked a significant development in India's regulatory landscape for the
digital economy, impacting companies operating in the social media and online content space. (Times
of India , 2023)

Social media platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter are going through a significant shift in
regulatory oversight with the government’s actions. The regulations, termed the Intermediary
Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code, mandate the establishment of grievance redressal
mechanisms, requiring social media platforms to appoint new executives to coordinate with law
enforcement within three months. Additionally, the rules stipulate that content must be removed within
36 hours of receiving a legal order and demand cooperation from companies in cyber security-related
incidents.

Moreover, video-streaming platforms like Netflix and Amazon's Prime Video are also brought under
regulation, necessitating the classification of content based on users' age. However, with these
regulations, critics express concerns over potential risks to freedom of speech, highlighting the delicate
balance between regulation and censorship in the digital economy landscape. This move reflects the
broader trend of increased scrutiny of tech companies worldwide and underscores the evolving
regulatory considerations and challenges faced by companies operating in the digital space. (Kalra,
2021)
5.DIGITAL TAXATION IN INDIA

The regulatory landscape governing digital taxation in India experienced a significant shift with the
introduction of the Equalisation Levy in 2016, primarily targeting online advertising services. However,
a pivotal moment occurred on April 1, 2020, when its scope expanded significantly to encompass e-
commerce supply or services provided by non-resident operators to Indian customers. This expansion
subjected non-resident e-commerce operators to a 2% tax on gross income, unless transactions were
linked to a permanent establishment in India or were already subject to the original 6% EL on
advertising services. Companies such as Amazon and Netflix, operating in the e-commerce and online
streaming sectors, found themselves navigating these new tax implications.

Companies have to follow rules like reporting and paying taxes every three months, and if they don't,
they can face big fines. Businesses that sell things online from other countries, like Shopify and eBay,
find it tough to register for taxes, track transactions, and report yearly. The tax rules apply to many
industries, such as travel, hospitality, and professional services, making it hard for companies like
Airbnb and Upwork to figure out their taxes and follow the rules. The tax laws also affect international
companies like Google and Facebook because they apply to businesses outside of India, leading to
confusion about how these taxes fit with international tax agreements and whether companies can get
credit for taxes paid in other countries. As companies grapple with these regulatory changes, they must
reassess their India-centric operations, compliance systems, and engagement strategies with
policymakers to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape effectively. (RSM, 2023)

These array of complexities in the taxation of non-resident e-commerce platforms can significantly
impact the ease of doing business in India which is why there is a need for a clearer and more
streamlined regulatory framework. This could deter foreign investment and hinder the growth of the
digital economy in India. Therefore, it is essential for policymakers to work towards creating a
conducive environment for businesses by establishing transparent and predictable tax regulations.

6.CONCLUSION

In conclusion, India's digital economy has experienced significant growth, propelled by technology
advancements and government initiatives like Digital India. However, regulatory challenges persist,
particularly in areas such as data privacy, digital finance, virtual assets, and taxation. The regulatory
landscape is characterized by inconsistency and ambiguity, leading to uncertainty for businesses and
consumers. Efforts to address these challenges include initiatives like the Personal Data Protection Bill
and regulations for e-commerce and digital media platforms. However, overlapping jurisdictions and
lack of coordination pose obstacles.
The expansion of the Equalisation Levy to cover e-commerce transactions adds compliance burdens for
non-resident operators and impacts various industries. To sustain growth, policymakers must prioritize
creating a transparent regulatory environment that fosters innovation while protecting consumer rights
and data privacy. In summary, effective collaboration between stakeholders and regulatory authorities
is crucial for navigating India's digital regulatory landscape. By addressing regulatory challenges, India
can harness its digital potential to drive economic growth and establish itself as a global digital leader.

WORKS CITED

Srivastava, D. K. (2023). How digital transformation will help India accelerate its growth in the coming
years. EY .

Ministry of Electronics & IT. (2023). Address by the Hon’ble Minister of State for Electronics and
Information Technology; and Skill Development and Entrepreneurship Shri Rajeev
Chandrasekhar at GPI Global Summit in Pune on 12.06.2023 . Delhi: RBI.

AMA Legal Solutions. (2024, February 6). Paytm Payments Bank Faces Regulatory Hurdles: RBI
Restrictions, Fines, and the Road Ahead. Retrieved from Linkedln:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/paytm-payments-bank-faces-regulatory-hurdles-rbi-
restrictions-odv8c/

Financial express. (2024, March 11). RBI goes after ‘peer-to-peer’ transactions – Cred, NoBroker on radar.
Retrieved from Financial Express: https://www.financialexpress.com/business/banking-finance-
rbi-goes-after-peer-to-peer-transactions-cred-nobroker-others-on-radar-bkg-3421204/

Kumar, R. (2024, March 12). RBI Heightens Scrutiny on Co-Branded Credit Cards Amidst Sector Growth.
Retrieved from Linkedln: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/rbi-heightens-scrutiny-co-branded-
credit-cards-amidst-ritesh-kumar-3yjjf/?trk=public_post_main-feed-card_feed-article-content

Swati Bhat, S. N. (2024, March 15). India cenbank widens scrutiny of credit ‘exuberance’, sources say.
Retrieved from The Print: https://theprint.in/india/exclusive-india-cenbank-widens-scrutiny-of-
credit-exuberance-sources-say/2002552/

Times of India . (2023, November 25). Government has a 'warning' for Facebook, YouTube. Retrieved from
Times of India : https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/gadgets-news/government-has-a-warning-
for-facebook-youtube/articleshow/105494139.cms

Kalra, S. P. (2021, February 26). India tightens regulatory grip on Facebook, WhatsApp with new rules.
Retrieved from Rueters: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2AP16K/

RSM. (2023). India has significantly expanded its equalization levy. RSM.

Gupta, P. (2022). Impact of Regulatory Uncertainty on Ease of Doing Digital Business in India. CUTS
International - Discussion Paper, 20.