Prime Minister (PM) Speech

"Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and esteemed judges. Today, we stand in
affirm support of the motion: 'AI assisted research and writing tools improve
efficiency and innovation in academic work without compromising intellectual
integrity.' As the Government, we will show how these tools make studying faster,
spark new ideas, and keep us honest. Let me break this down step by step.

First, let’s define what we’re talking about.

AI assisted tools are software like Grammarly, ChatGPT, or EndNote that help
with tasks like writing, editing, and organizing research.
Efficiency means getting more done in less time.
Innovation means coming up with new and creative ideas.
Intellectual integrity means being honest and original in our work.

Now, let’s dive into our first argument: AI tools save time and make us more
efficient . For example, instead of spending hours fixing grammar or formatting
citations, tools like Grammarly do it in seconds. This means students and
researchers can focus on the bigger picture—like developing strong arguments or
solving complex problems. This idea ties into Utilitarianism , which says we
should do what brings the most benefit to the most people. By saving time, AI
tools help everyone work smarter, not harder.

Our second argument is that AI tools spark innovation. They help us think outside
the box. For instance, if you’re stuck on a science project, AI can suggest new
experiments or connect ideas you hadn’t thought of. In medicine, AI has helped
researchers discover new drugs faster by analyzing huge amounts of data. This
connects to Kant’s idea of imagination, where AI acts like a creative partner,
helping us see things in new ways.
Our third argument is that AI tools don’t make us cheat
They help us stay honest. Tools like Turnitin check for plagiarism, making sure our
work is original. Plus, AI doesn’t replace our thinking it just gives us a hand. This
aligns with Kant’s Categorical Imperative , which means doing the right thing
because it’s the right thing to do. AI helps us stay accountable and ethical in our
work.

We know the other team might say AI encourages cheating or makes us lazy. But
that’s not true. AI tools like plagiarism checkers actually prevent cheating, and
they help us work smarter, not lazier. For example, Grammarly doesn’t write your
essay for you it helps you write it better.

In conclusion, AI tools make studying faster, help us come up with new ideas, and
keep us honest. They’re not just helpful they’re essential for modern education. We
urge you to stand with us in supporting this motion. Thank you."

Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) Speech

"Thank you, Prime Minister. Let me add to our case by focusing on how AI tools
drive innovation and address concerns about fairness.

First, AI tools help us make big discoveries. For example, in climate science, AI
analyzes huge amounts of data to predict weather patterns or find ways to reduce
pollution. This is what we call a paradigm shift a completely new way of solving
problems. AI doesn’t just make small improvements; it helps us rethink how we
approach challenges.
Now, some people worry that AI might be biased or unfair. But here’s the thing:
AI is only as good as the data we give it. If we work together to make sure AI is
fair, it can actually help us spot and fix our own biases. This idea of working
together to solve problems is called Discourse Ethics. It’s about having open
conversations to make sure everyone is treated fairly.
In short, AI helps us make big breakthroughs and can be made fair if we work
together. It’s a tool that’s here to help us, not hurt us. Thank you.

Government Member (GM) Speech

"Let me summarize why we’re right. AI tools make studying faster, help us think
creatively, and keep us honest. They’re like having a super smart study buddy who
never gets tired.
These ideas are backed by some important philosophies. Utilitarianism says AI
makes life better for everyone by saving time. Kant’s ideas remind us to use AI
responsibly and stay honest. And Virtue Ethics shows how AI helps us become
better students by letting us focus on what really matters.

In short, AI tools are awesome for students, and they help us grow while staying
true to our values. Thank you!"

Government Whip (GW) Speech

"The other team might say AI makes us lazy or encourages cheating. But let’s set
the record straight. AI tools like plagiarism checkers actually prevent cheating by
making sure our work is original. And AI doesn’t do the work for us—it helps us
do it better. For example, Grammarly doesn’t write your essay; it helps you write it
more clearly.
While the other team focuses on the negatives, we’ve shown the real benefits: AI
saves time, boosts creativity, and keeps us honest. It’s a tool that helps us grow, not
a crutch that holds us back.

In short, AI is here to help us succeed, and we should embrace it. Thank you!"

Cross Examination Questions

For PM :
1. "Can you give an example of how Grammarly helps students write better
essays?"
2. "How does AI make sure we don’t rely on it too much?"

For DPM :
1. "Can you name one big discovery that AI helped scientists make?"
2. "How can we make sure AI is fair for everyone?"

For GM :
1. "How does AI help students who don’t have access to expensive resources?"
2. "Can you explain how AI helps us become better students?"

For GW :
1. "What would you say to someone who thinks AI makes students lazy?"
2. "How does AI help us avoid copying someone else’s work?"
 Philosophical Concepts in One Sentence
1. Utilitarianism : AI tools save time and make life better for everyone.
2. Kant’s Categorical Imperative : AI helps us stay honest and do the right thing.
3. Virtue Ethics : AI helps us become better students by letting us focus on what
matters.
4. Discourse Ethics : We can work together to make sure AI is fair for everyone.

This version keeps the academic tone of a debate but uses clear, simple
language to make the arguments easy to understand. It’s perfect for a high school
audience while still being persuasive and well structured. Let me know if you need
further adjustments!
Anti-Thesis and Rebuttal for the Government's Arguments
The Opposition might argue against the motion by claiming that AI-assisted tools
compromise intellectual integrity, reduce critical thinking, and create overreliance
on technology. Below is a breakdown of their potential arguments and how the
Government can logically rebut them.

Opposition's Anti-Thesis
AI Tools Compromise Intellectual Integrity:

Claim: AI tools like ChatGPT and Grammarly can generate or rewrite content,
which may lead to plagiarism or the submission of work that is not entirely the
student’s own.

Example: If a student uses AI to write an entire essay, they may not fully
understand the content, leading to a lack of originality and intellectual dishonesty.

AI Reduces Critical Thinking:

Claim: Overreliance on AI tools can make students lazy, as they may depend on AI
for ideas, structure, and even arguments instead of developing these skills
themselves.

Example: If AI suggests arguments or perspectives, students might not learn how

to critically analyze information or form their own opinions.

AI Creates Overreliance on Technology:

Claim: Students may become too dependent on AI tools, losing the ability to write,
research, or think independently.

Example: If students always use AI to check grammar or generate citations, they

might not learn these skills themselves, making them less capable in the long run.
AI Tools Are Not Always Accurate:

Claim: AI tools can produce errors, biases, or misleading information, which can
harm the quality and credibility of academic work.

Example: If an AI tool misinterprets data or provides incorrect citations, it could

lead to flawed research or arguments.

Government's Rebuttal Using Logic and Reasoning

AI Tools Do Not Compromise Intellectual Integrity:

Rebuttal: AI tools are designed to assist, not replace, human effort. Tools like
Turnitin and Grammarly actively promote intellectual integrity by detecting
plagiarism and ensuring proper citation. The responsibility for originality lies with
the user, not the tool.

Example: Just as a calculator doesn’t solve math problems on its own, AI tools
don’t write essays for students. They provide support, but the ideas and arguments
must come from the student.

AI Enhances Critical Thinking:

Rebuttal: AI tools can actually foster critical thinking by providing alternative

perspectives and challenging students to evaluate and refine their ideas. For
instance, if AI suggests a different argument, students must critically assess
whether it aligns with their research and reasoning.

Example: Using AI to brainstorm ideas is like having a study group—it exposes

you to new perspectives, but you still need to analyze and decide which ideas to
use.

AI Encourages Skill Development:

Rebuttal: AI tools are not a crutch but a learning aid. By using tools like
Grammarly, students can learn from their mistakes and improve their writing skills
over time. AI provides feedback, but the student must apply it.
Example: Just as spell-check helps students learn correct spelling, AI tools help
students understand grammar, structure, and citation formats, ultimately making
them better writers.

AI Tools Are Reliable When Used Responsibly:

Rebuttal: While AI tools are not perfect, their accuracy improves with proper use.
Students must fact-check and verify AI-generated content, just as they would with
any other source. This encourages responsible research habits.

Example: If an AI tool suggests a citation, the student should cross-check it with

the original source to ensure accuracy. This process reinforces critical research
skills.

Overcoming the Opposition's Arguments

Intellectual Integrity:

Strategy: Emphasize that AI tools are designed to uphold intellectual integrity, not
undermine it. Tools like Turnitin and Grammarly actively prevent plagiarism and
ensure proper citation.

Example: Turnitin doesn’t just detect plagiarism—it teaches students how to

properly cite sources and avoid academic dishonesty.

Critical Thinking:

Strategy: Highlight how AI tools can stimulate critical thinking by offering new
perspectives and challenging students to refine their ideas.

Example: If AI suggests a different argument, students must critically evaluate

whether it aligns with their research and reasoning, fostering deeper engagement
with the material.

Overreliance on Technology:

Strategy: Argue that AI tools are learning aids, not replacements for human effort.
They help students develop skills by providing feedback and guidance.

Example: Just as a GPS helps you navigate but doesn’t drive the car for you, AI
tools assist with writing but don’t replace the student’s role in the process.
Accuracy of AI Tools:

Strategy: Acknowledge that AI tools are not infallible but argue that their
limitations can be mitigated through responsible use. Students must verify AI-
generated content, which reinforces good research habits.

Example: If an AI tool suggests a citation, the student should cross-check it with

the original source to ensure accuracy. This process reinforces critical research
skills.

Conclusion
The Opposition’s concerns about AI tools compromising intellectual integrity,
reducing critical thinking, and creating overreliance on technology are valid but
can be addressed through responsible use. AI tools are not a threat to academic
integrity—they are a resource that, when used strategically, can enhance
efficiency, foster innovation, and uphold the highest standards of intellectual rigor.
By embracing AI as a partner in the academic process, we can unlock new levels
of productivity and creativity while maintaining the integrity of our work.

Thus, we firmly stand in affirmation of the motion: AI-assisted research and

writing tools improve efficiency and innovation in academic work without
compromising intellectual integrity.
1. Opposition Argument: AI Tools Compromise Intellectual Integrity
Rebuttal:
The claim that AI tools compromise intellectual integrity is based on a
misunderstanding of how these tools are designed to function. AI tools like
Turnitin and Grammarly are not meant to replace human effort but to enhance it.
For example, Turnitin actively detects plagiarism and teaches students how to
properly cite sources, promoting academic honesty. Grammarly provides grammar
and style suggestions, but the final responsibility for originality lies with the
student. Just as a calculator doesn’t solve math problems on its own, AI tools don’t
write essays for students—they provide support, but the ideas and arguments must
come from the student. Furthermore, AI tools can create a transparent workflow
where every edit and suggestion is tracked, ensuring that students take ownership
of their work. Therefore, when used responsibly, AI tools uphold intellectual
integrity rather than undermine it.

2. Opposition Argument: AI Reduces Critical Thinking

Rebuttal:
The idea that AI tools reduce critical thinking overlooks the ways in which these
tools actually stimulate deeper engagement with academic work. AI tools like
ChatGPT and Jasper provide alternative perspectives and challenge students to
evaluate and refine their ideas. For instance, if AI suggests a different argument,
students must critically assess whether it aligns with their research and reasoning.
This process fosters critical thinking by encouraging students to defend their ideas
and explore new angles. Think of AI as a debate partner—it offers
counterarguments, but the student must analyze and decide which ideas to use. Far
from making students lazy, AI tools push them to think more deeply and creatively
about their work.

3. Opposition Argument: AI Creates Overreliance on Technology

Rebuttal:
The concern that AI tools create overreliance on technology assumes that these
tools replace human effort, but in reality, they are designed to complement it.
Tools like Grammarly and Zotero provide feedback and guidance, helping students
learn from their mistakes and improve their skills over time. For example,
Grammarly doesn’t just correct grammar—it explains why a correction is needed,
helping students internalize the rules. Similarly, Zotero helps students organize
references, but they still need to understand how to cite sources properly. Just as a
GPS helps you navigate but doesn’t drive the car for you, AI tools assist with
writing but don’t replace the student’s role in the process. By using AI as a
learning aid, students can develop their skills and become more independent over
time.

4. Opposition Argument: AI Tools Are Not Always Accurate

Rebuttal:
While it’s true that AI tools are not perfect, their limitations can be mitigated
through responsible use. Students must fact-check and verify AI-generated content,
just as they would with any other source. For example, if an AI tool suggests a
citation, the student should cross-check it with the original source to ensure
accuracy. This process reinforces critical research skills and ensures the credibility
of academic work. Additionally, advanced AI tools can be programmed to identify
and flag potential biases, helping students produce more balanced and credible
work. Rather than dismissing AI tools for their imperfections, we should focus on
teaching students how to use them responsibly to enhance their research and
writing.

5. Opposition Argument: AI Tools Undermine Human Creativity

Rebuttal:
The claim that AI tools undermine creativity ignores the ways in which these tools
can actually enhance it. AI tools like Jasper and Writesonic suggest unconventional
ideas or approaches, pushing students to think outside the box. For example, if a
student is writing a story, AI might suggest a unique plot twist or character
development angle. Similarly, AI tools can help students experiment with different
writing styles or tones, allowing them to discover their unique voice. Think of AI
as a creative partner—it suggests new ingredients, but the final flavor is entirely up
to the chef. By using AI to spark ideas, students can explore new possibilities
while maintaining their originality and creativity.

6. Opposition Argument: AI Tools Create Inequality

Rebuttal:
The concern that AI tools create inequality is valid, but it can be addressed through
institutional support and responsible policies. Many AI tools offer free versions
with robust features, making them accessible to a wide range of students. For
example, Grammarly’s free version provides essential grammar and style checks,
while Zotero’s free reference management tools are widely used in academia.
Additionally, institutions can provide access to AI tools as part of their resources,
ensuring that all students have the support they need to succeed. Just as libraries
provide free access to books, universities can provide free access to AI tools,
leveling the playing field and reducing disparities.

7. Opposition Argument: AI Tools Encourage Laziness

Rebuttal:
The idea that AI tools encourage laziness assumes that students will use these tools
to cut corners, but in reality, they are designed to enhance productivity, not replace
effort. Tools like Grammarly and QuillBot automate repetitive tasks like grammar
checks and paraphrasing, allowing students to focus on higher-order thinking and
creativity. For example, instead of spending hours fixing grammar, students can
use Grammarly to quickly identify errors and learn from them. This doesn’t make
students lazy—it helps them work smarter. Just as a carpenter uses power tools to
build furniture faster, students use AI tools to write more efficiently. The
craftsmanship still comes from the carpenter—or in this case, the student.

8. Opposition Argument: AI Tools Lack Ethical Oversight

Rebuttal:
The ethical concerns surrounding AI tools are important, but they can be addressed
through clear guidelines and responsible use. For example, institutions can
establish policies to ensure data privacy and mitigate biases in AI algorithms. AI
tools can also be programmed to track edits and suggestions, creating a transparent
workflow that ensures accountability. By promoting ethical use, we can address
concerns about data privacy and bias while still leveraging the benefits of AI tools.
Just as universities have policies for citing sources, they can establish guidelines
for using AI tools ethically, ensuring that these tools enhance rather than
compromise academic integrity.

9. Opposition Argument: AI Tools Cannot Replace Human Judgment

Rebuttal:
The claim that AI tools cannot replace human judgment is true, but it misses the
point—AI tools are not meant to replace human judgment but to complement it.
Tools like ChatGPT and Grammarly provide feedback and suggestions, but the
final decisions and judgments are made by the user. For example, if AI suggests a
different argument, the student must critically evaluate whether it aligns with their
research and reasoning. This process enhances the quality of academic work while
leaving the final creative and analytical decisions to the student. Think of AI as a
recipe—it provides a guide, but the chef adds their own flair. By using AI as a
support system, students can enhance their work while maintaining their unique
voice and perspective.

10. Opposition Argument: AI Tools May Lead to Job Displacement

Rebuttal:
The concern that AI tools may lead to job displacement overlooks the ways in
which these tools can enhance, rather than replace, the role of educators. AI tools
can automate repetitive tasks like grading and citation formatting, freeing up
educators to focus on higher-value activities like mentoring, personalized
instruction, and research. For example, instead of spending hours grading essays,
educators can use AI tools to provide initial feedback, allowing them to focus on
one-on-one interactions with students. Rather than replacing jobs, AI tools can
transform the role of educators, enabling them to provide more personalized and
impactful support. Just as email reduced the need for postal workers but created
new jobs in IT, AI tools can enhance the role of educators without eliminating
jobs.

Thus, we firmly stand in affirmation of the motion: AI-assisted research and

writing tools improve efficiency and innovation in academic work without
compromising intellectual integrity.