MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

SOCIOLOGY (OPTIONAL)
KEY

Q1. Write short answers to the following questions in about 150 words each, with a
sociological perspective:
Q1. (a) What do you understand by social action? How does it differ from behaviour?

Social action refers to the intentional and conscious behaviour of individuals or groups that takes into
consideration the actions and reactions of others in a social context. It involves individuals making
choices and taking actions based on their understanding of the social situation and the anticipated
responses of others.

The concept of social action was introduced by German sociologist Max Weber. He argued that
individuals engage in social action based on their subjective meanings and interpretations of the social
situations they encounter. Weber identified four types of social action –

1. Traditional action –
 This type of action is guided by long-established customs, traditions, and routines.

 Individuals engage in traditional action because it has been done that way in the past,
without questioning or reflecting on its purpose or consequences.

 For example, a person following a religious ritual simply because it has always been practiced
in their family.

2. Affective action –
 Affective action is driven by an individual's emotions, desires, or immediate impulses.

 It is spontaneous and often lacks rational consideration.

 An example of affective action is an impulsive purchase made due to a sudden desire or

excitement.

3. Value-rational action –
 Value-rational action is motivated by a commitment to a set of values, beliefs, or ethical
principles.

 Individuals engage in such actions because they see them as inherently valuable, regardless
of their immediate consequences.

 For instance, someone refusing to lie even if it benefits them personally because they believe in
the value of honesty.

4. Instrumental rational action –

 This type of action is based on a rational calculation of means and ends.

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 1

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

 Individuals engage in instrumental rational action when they weigh the costs and benefits of
different courses of action to achieve a specific goal.

 For example, a person choosing a particular job because it offers higher pay or better career
prospects.

Talcott Parsons, a prominent sociologist, proposed a theory of social action that includes three types:
instrumental action, expressive action, and moral action. These types of action help to understand
human behaviour in social contexts.

1. Instrumental Action: This type of action is driven by individuals' goal-oriented behaviour

aimed at achieving specific outcomes or results. Instrumental action is rational and practical in
nature, focusing on efficiently utilizing resources to attain desired objectives. It is often
associated with economic activities or tasks that serve practical purposes.

2. Expressive Action: Expressive action emphasizes the emotional and personal aspects of
human behaviour. It is motivated by an individual's need for self-expression, emotional
satisfaction, or the desire to convey their feelings and attitudes. Expressive action is
characterized by behaviours such as artistic expression, emotional communication, and
symbolic gestures.

3. Moral Action: Moral action refers to behaviour guided by ethical or moral principles. It is
concerned with notions of right and wrong, fairness, justice, and social norms. Moral action is
influenced by the internalized values and beliefs of individuals and society. It encompasses
actions aimed at promoting social justice, equality, and adherence to ethical standards.

George Herbert Mead –

 Mead, a symbolic interactionist, emphasized the role of social interaction in shaping social action.

 He argued that individuals develop a sense of self and their understanding of social reality
through interactions with others.

 Social actions are influenced by the meanings individuals attribute to symbols and the social roles
they assume.

 For example, when a person attends a job interview, their social action is shaped by their
understanding of the expectations associated with the job position, their perception of the
interviewer's cues and gestures, and their own interpretation of the situation.

Erving Goffman –

 Goffman's dramaturgical approach highlights how individuals engage in impression

management during social interactions. He argued that individuals perform different roles and
present themselves strategically to shape the perceptions of others.

 For instance, when a person dresses formally and adopts a professional demeanour during a
job interview, their behaviour can be seen as a social action aimed at creating a favourable
impression and increasing their chances of success.

Distinguishing Social Action from Behaviour -

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 2

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

1. Meaning and Intention - Social action emphasizes the subjective meaning and intention
behind an individual's behaviour, while behaviour focuses on observable actions. Social action
takes into account the motives, values, beliefs, and goals that guide individuals' actions. It
recognizes that people's behaviour is not solely determined by external factors but also by their
interpretations of the situation and their intended outcomes. In contrast, behaviour refers to
the actions themselves, which can be observed and analysed without necessarily considering
the underlying meaning or intention.

2. Context and Interpretation - Social action is context-dependent and requires interpretation

within a given social context. It recognizes that the same behaviour may have different
meanings and implications depending on the cultural, social, and historical context in which it
occurs. Social action acknowledges the importance of understanding the broader social
structures, norms, and values that shape individuals' actions. On the other hand, behaviour
can be observed and analysed in a more general sense, without necessarily considering the
specific social context or interpretation.

3. Agency and Consciousness - Social action highlights the role of human agency and
consciousness in shaping behaviour. It recognizes that individuals are active agents who make
choices and decisions based on their own perceptions and understandings of the social world.
Social action emphasizes that individuals have the capacity to reflect on their actions, to weigh
different options, and to act intentionally. Behaviour, on the other hand, can be seen as a more
automatic or instinctive response to stimuli, without necessarily involving conscious thought or
agency.

Social action goes beyond mere behaviour by considering the social context, meanings, and intentions
behind individuals' actions. It emphasizes the interactive and interpretive nature of human conduct,
highlighting the role of symbols, values, and social relationships in shaping behaviour.

Q1. (b) What are social facts? Should social facts be treated as ‘things’ ?

Social facts refer to the patterns of behaviour, beliefs, and practices that exist within a society and are
considered objective and external to individuals. These facts are not dependent on individual
opinions or preferences but are rather the result of collective agreements, norms, and institutions.
French sociologist Émile Durkheim introduced the concept of social facts, emphasizing their influence
on individual behaviour and the functioning of society as a whole.

Durkheim argued that social facts have an objective reality and should be treated as things, similar to
objects in the natural world. However, other sociologists have raised concerns about reducing complex
social phenomena to the status of 'things' and neglecting the subjective and interpretive aspects of
human behaviour.

1. Durkheim's Perspective: Social Facts as 'Things'

 Émile Durkheim believed that social facts have an existence independent of individual
consciousness and can be studied scientifically. According to him, social facts possess the
following characteristics:
o External and Coercive: Social facts exist outside individuals and exert a coercive influence
on them. They constrain individual behaviour through social norms, laws, and moral codes.
 Example: Legal systems represent social facts as they exist independently of individuals and
exert control through laws that individuals must follow.
o Objective and General: Social facts are objective because they are not influenced by
individual subjectivity or personal preferences. They have a general character, meaning they

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 3

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

apply to a significant number of individuals within a society.

 Example: Cultural practices, such as marriage ceremonies or funeral rituals, are social facts as
they are widely shared and follow established patterns.

2. Critiques - Social Facts as Interpreted Meanings -

 Other sociologists, influenced by interpretive approaches, argue that social facts should not
be treated as 'things' but rather as socially constructed meanings. They emphasize the
subjective interpretations and meanings attached to social phenomena. This perspective
challenges the idea of an objective reality of social facts and highlights the importance of
understanding individual experiences and interpretations.
o Subjectivity and Interpretation - Critics argue that social facts are not external objects
but rather the shared meanings, interpretations, and understandings constructed by
individuals within a society. These meanings can vary based on cultural, historical, and
individual contexts.
 Example: Money can be seen as a social fact, but its value and meaning can differ
across societies, historical periods, and individuals' interpretations.
o Reflexivity and Contextuality - Social facts are seen as reflexive and contextual, meaning
they are influenced by the actions, interactions, and interpretations of individuals. They are
not fixed entities but constantly negotiated and redefined through social processes.
 Example: Social media platforms, like Facebook or Instagram, are social facts that are
shaped by user interactions, feedback, and evolving norms within the digital realm.

Regardless of the perspective, understanding social facts is crucial for comprehending how societies
function and how individuals are shaped by their social environment.

Q1. (c) What are the basic postulates of Marxian dialectical method?

Marxian dialectical method, derived from the philosophy of dialectical materialism, is a key aspect of
Karl Marx's analysis of society, history, and change. It is based on a dialectical understanding of reality,
emphasizing contradictions, conflicts, and the dynamic interplay between opposing forces. The basic
postulates of Marxian dialectical method can be summarized as follows:

1. The Primacy of Material Conditions –

 Marxian dialectics asserts that material conditions, such as the mode of production and the
corresponding social relations, are the fundamental factors that shape the development of
societies.
 Changes in the economic base of society drive social and political transformations.
 For example, Marx argued that the transition from feudalism to capitalism was primarily a
result of changes in the productive forces, particularly the development of industrial
technology.

2. Contradictions and Conflict -

 Dialectics recognizes the existence of inherent contradictions within social systems.

 Marx believed that these contradictions arise from the tension between the forces of

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 4

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

production (technology, labour, and resources) and the relations of production (ownership,
class structure, and exploitation).
 These contradictions give rise to conflicts, struggles, and revolutionary movements.
 An example of this can be seen in the class struggle between the bourgeoisie (capitalist
class) and the proletariat (working class), where the contradiction lies in the exploitation of
labour and the unequal distribution of wealth.

3. Negation of the Negation -

 According to Marxian dialectics, change occurs through a process of negation of the existing
order. This means that existing social structures and institutions give rise to their own
contradictions, leading to their eventual negation and replacement by new social forms.
 For instance, capitalism, with its inherent contradictions of class struggle and exploitation,
is seen as a negation of feudalism.
 However, capitalism itself contains contradictions that will eventually lead to its negation
and the emergence of a socialist society.
4. Unity of Opposites -

 Dialectics recognizes that opposites are not rigidly separate entities but are interconnected
and interdependent. Opposing forces and ideas exist in a dialectical relationship, and their
interaction generates change.
 Marx highlighted the unity of opposites in the relationship between labour and capital.
 Labor, as the creative force, is essential for the production of goods, while capital, as the
ownership of the means of production, controls and exploits labour. These opposing forces
are interconnected, with labour creating value and capital accumulating profits.
5. Historical Development -

 Dialectics emphasizes the historical and developmental nature of society.

 Marx argued that history unfolds through stages of social development, driven by the
internal contradictions within each stage.
 Feudalism gave way to capitalism, and capitalism would eventually be superseded by socialism
and communism.
 Each stage carries within it the seeds of its own negation and the potential for a higher form of
social organization.

These postulates form the basis of Marxian dialectical method, which provides a framework for analysing
social change and understanding the dynamics of class struggle and revolution. It emphasizes the
interconnectedness of social phenomena, the role of contradictions and conflicts, and the importance of
material conditions in shaping human history

Q2. (a) Examine the statement, ‘conflicts that arise because of inequality are what foster
social change.’

The statement "conflicts that arise because of inequality are what foster social change" suggests that
social change occurs as a result of conflicts that emerge due to unequal distribution of resources,
opportunities, and power in society.
Karl Marx -

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 5

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

 Karl Marx, a prominent sociologist and philosopher, argued that inequality is inherent in
capitalist societies and leads to social conflict. According to Marx, conflicts arise due to the
unequal distribution of wealth and resources, where the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) exploits
the proletariat (working class). This exploitation creates class struggle and tension between the
two classes.
 Marx believed that these conflicts could lead to social change as the working class becomes
aware of their exploitation and fights for their rights. He argued that this struggle could
ultimately result in the overthrow of the capitalist system and the establishment of a classless
society. Marx's theory of social change through class conflict provides a foundation for
understanding how inequality can lead to transformative social movements.

 Example: The labour movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries can be seen as
examples of conflicts arising from inequality leading to social change. Workers organized
protests, strikes, and unions to demand better working conditions, fair wages, and
improved rights. These collective actions aimed to address the power imbalances between
workers and employers, ultimately leading to the establishment of labour laws and reforms.
Emile Durkheim -

 Emile Durkheim, another influential sociologist, had a different perspective on the relationship
between inequality and social change. Durkheim focused on the role of social solidarity in
maintaining societal order and stability. He argued that excessive inequality could lead to
anomie, a state of normlessness or social instability, which can undermine social cohesion.

 Durkheim believed that society required a certain level of social integration to function properly.
In his view, conflicts arising from extreme inequality could disrupt this integration and lead to
social unrest. However, Durkheim also recognized that a certain degree of social change was
necessary for societal progress.

 Example: Durkheim's perspective can be applied to instances where extreme inequality has led
to social unrest and a breakdown of social order. For example, the French Revolution of 1789
was fuelled by deep social inequalities and a sense of injustice among the lower classes. The
revolution resulted in significant political and social changes in France, challenging the existing
hierarchical order and leading to the emergence of new forms of governance.
Other Sociological Perspectives -
Other sociological perspectives also shed light on the relationship between inequality, conflicts,
and social change. For instance:

 Max Weber highlighted the significance of social stratification and power dynamics in shaping
society. Weber argued that conflicts could arise not only due to economic inequality but also
from differences in social status and political power. These conflicts can motivate social change
as marginalized groups strive to challenge and redefine existing power structures.

 Contemporary sociologists like Pierre Bourdieu emphasized the concept of cultural capital and
how inequalities in education and access to cultural resources contribute to social inequalities.

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 6

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

Conflicts arising from such disparities can lead to demands for educational reforms and policies
that aim to create a more equitable society.

 These sociological perspectives collectively support the notion that conflicts rooted in inequality
are significant drivers of social change. They highlight how struggles for equality and justice
emerge from societal disparities and contribute to transformative processes.

(b) Religion, Durkheim argued, is not only a social creation, but it is in fact society
divinized. Comment.

Émile Durkheim, a renowned sociologist, indeed argued that religion is not merely a personal or
individual belief system but rather a social creation that reflects and embodies the collective conscience
of a society. According to Durkheim, religion serves as a unifying force, creating a sacred realm that
elevates society above the mundane and gives meaning to collective life. In this sense, religion can be
seen as the divinization or personification of society itself.

Sacred and Profane -

 Durkheim's perspective on religion can be understood through his concept of the "sacred" and the
"profane."
 The sacred represents the realm of beliefs, rituals, and symbols that are considered
extraordinary and set apart from the everyday, while the profane encompasses the ordinary and
mundane aspects of life.
 By making certain aspects of society sacred, religion creates a distinction between the sacred
and the profane, providing a framework for social order and cohesion.
Totem -
 One example of religion as the divinization of society is the concept of totems among Indigenous
Australian tribes, which Durkheim extensively studied.
 Totems are natural or animal symbols that represent particular clans or groups within the tribe.
 The totem, such as a specific animal or plant, becomes sacred and is worshipped as a
representation of the collective identity and unity of the group.
 The totem serves as a unifying force, reinforcing social solidarity and providing a sense of shared
purpose and belonging.

Nationalism -

 Another example can be seen in the rituals and practices associated with nationalism.
 In many societies, patriotism and loyalty to one's nation are revered and celebrated as sacred
values.
 National holidays, flag ceremonies, and other nationalistic rituals serve to reinforce a collective
identity and pride in the nation.
 The nation itself can be seen as a form of divinity, as it embodies the ideals, values, and
aspirations of the society.

Market –

 Moreover, certain social institutions can be viewed as divinized entities. In capitalism, the
market is often revered as a guiding force, almost having a transcendental quality.

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 7

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

 The belief in the "invisible hand" of the market reflects a faith in its inherent wisdom and ability
to bring order and prosperity to society.

Representation of Societal Values -

 Furthermore, religious institutions and organizations play a significant role in reinforcing social
order and moral values within a society. Religious rituals, such as weddings, funerals, and
religious holidays, bring people together, create a sense of community, and provide a shared
moral framework. The divine figures, gods, or deities worshipped within religions often
represent societal ideals, virtues, and norms.
 For example, in Hinduism, the concept of dharma, which encompasses moral duty,
righteousness, and social order, is closely associated with the divine figure of Lord Rama. Rama
is seen as an ideal king, husband, and son, embodying the moral values that Hindu society
admires and seeks to uphold. Thus, Rama's divinity represents the divinization of the social and
moral order cherished by the community.

However, it is important to note that Durkheim's argument does not necessarily imply the existence of
a supernatural or metaphysical realm. Instead, he focused on the social functions and effects of
religion. For Durkheim, religion was a social phenomenon that played a crucial role in maintaining
social solidarity, regulating behaviour, and providing individuals with a sense of meaning and purpose
in the collective life of a society.

(c) How does Weber describe ideal types by their levels of abstraction?

Max Weber, a prominent sociologist and philosopher, developed the concept of ideal types as a
methodological tool to analyse and understand social phenomena. Ideal types are analytical constructs
that represent abstract and simplified models of social reality. Weber used ideal types to identify and
analyse recurring patterns of behaviour, institutions, and social structures.

Weber described ideal types by their levels of abstraction, which refers to the degree of generalization
and simplification applied to the concept. There are three levels of abstraction in Weber's ideal types -

1. Pure Ideal Types –

 These are the most abstract and generalized forms of ideal types.
 Pure ideal types represent an extreme, idealized version of a social phenomenon, concept, or
institution.
 They are constructed by isolating and emphasizing specific characteristics or attributes that
are considered essential to the phenomenon being studied.
 Pure ideal types serve as conceptual benchmarks against which real-world cases can be
compared and analysed.
 Example - Weber's pure ideal type of bureaucracy is a classic example. He identified key
characteristics of bureaucracies such as hierarchical organization, division of labour, formal
rules and procedures, and impersonal relationships. While no real-world bureaucracy may
perfectly match this ideal type, it provides a framework for analysing and understanding
different bureaucratic organizations.

2. Historical Ideal Types –

 Historical ideal types are more concrete and specific than pure ideal types.

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 8

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

 They are based on empirical evidence and historical examples.

 Historical ideal types capture the characteristics and dynamics of specific social phenomena
in a particular historical context.
 These types are constructed by examining real-world cases and extracting common features.
 Example: Weber's historical ideal type of the Protestant Ethic is based on his analysis of
the relationship between Protestantism and the rise of capitalism in Western societies. He
examined historical evidence, such as the work ethic emphasized by certain Protestant
denominations, the accumulation of wealth, and the idea of predestination. The historical
ideal type captures the essential elements of this historical relationship.

Comparative Ideal Types –

 Comparative ideal types aim to compare and contrast different social phenomena across time
and space.
 They involve making systematic comparisons between different cases to identify similarities and
differences.
 Comparative ideal types help in understanding variations and patterns in social phenomena
across different contexts.
 Example: Weber's comparative ideal type of authority involves comparing different types of
authority, such as charismatic, traditional, and legal-rational. By comparing these types,
Weber highlighted how different forms of authority shape social relations and power
dynamics in various societies.

It's important to note that ideal types are analytical tools and simplifications of reality. They do not
represent actual existing entities or prescribe normative standards. Instead, they provide conceptual
frameworks that help in understanding and analysing social phenomena by highlighting their key
characteristics and dynamics.

Q3. (a) Was capitalism freed from the limits placed on it by Protestant morals? Clarify your
answer.
Protestantism, particularly in its early forms, had a number of beliefs and values that influenced the
development of capitalism. For example, the Protestant work ethic, which emphasized hard work,
frugality, and the pursuit of worldly success as signs of God's favour, provided a moral framework that
supported the accumulation of wealth. This mindset, combined with the belief in individual
responsibility and the idea that economic success was a reflection of personal virtue, contributed to the
development of capitalist systems.

However, it is important to note that capitalism has evolved and transformed over time, and its current
manifestations may differ significantly from the early capitalist systems influenced by Protestant
morals. Capitalism is a dynamic economic system that has been shaped by various factors, including
political, social, and cultural influences.
1. Consumerism and hedonism –

 Contemporary capitalism is often characterized by consumerism and the pursuit of pleasure

and material wealth.
 Sociologist Zygmunt Bauman argued that consumerism has become a dominant force,
replacing the Protestant ethic with a focus on instant gratification and the constant pursuit
of new desires and consumption patterns.

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 9

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

2. Financialization and speculative capitalism –

 Over the past few decades, capitalism has witnessed a significant shift towards
financialization, where financial markets and activities play a central role in the economy.
 Economist and sociologist Karl Polanyi highlighted how this shift can lead to a detachment
of financial activities from the real economy, prioritizing short-term profit maximization over
long-term productive investment.

3. The erosion of work ethic –

 Some sociologists argue that the traditional work ethic has been eroded in contemporary
capitalist societies.
 With the rise of automation and the gig economy, there is a growing concern about job
insecurity, precarious employment, and the erosion of stable career paths.
 This can lead to a decline in the sense of commitment and dedication to work.
4. Growing inequality –

 Capitalism's historical justification was often based on the idea that hard work and merit
would lead to social mobility and equal opportunities.
 However, contemporary societies are witnessing increasing levels of economic inequality.
 Sociologists such as Thomas Piketty argue that the concentration of wealth in the hands of
a few undermines the principles of equal opportunity and fairness.
5. Corporate power and influence –

 Capitalism today is characterized by the dominance of multinational corporations, often

with significant political influence.
 Sociologist C. Wright Mills discussed the concept of the "power elite" to describe the close
connections between political, economic, and military elites, suggesting that the power of
corporations can undermine democratic values and ethics.

6. Exploitative labour practices –

 Some sociologists argue that contemporary capitalism is marked by exploitative labour
practices, such as low wages, long working hours, and poor working conditions.
 These conditions can be seen as a departure from the traditional Protestant emphasis on
fair compensation for hard work.

7. Environmental degradation –

 Capitalism's pursuit of profit has often been criticized for its negative impact on the
environment.
 The profit motive can lead to overconsumption, pollution, and the depletion of natural
resources, which contradicts the Protestant ethic's emphasis on stewardship and
responsibility towards the earth.
8. Financial crises and systemic risks –

 The global financial crisis of 2008 revealed the systemic risks and ethical issues associated
with contemporary capitalism.
 Sociologist Manuel Castells discussed how the pursuit of short-term profits and the lack of
effective regulation contributed to the crisis, highlighting the misalignment between the
Protestant ethic and the behaviours of financial institutions.

9. Rise of alternative economic models –

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 10

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

 In recent years, there has been a growing interest in alternative economic models that
challenge the dominance of capitalism.
 Ideas such as degrowth, cooperatives, and social entrepreneurship seek to prioritize
sustainability, social justice, and community well-being over profit maximization, reflecting
a departure from traditional capitalist values.

10. However, it is important to note that capitalism has evolved and transformed over time, and its
current manifestations may differ significantly from the early capitalist systems influenced by
Protestant morals. Capitalism is a dynamic economic system that has been shaped by various
factors, including political, social, and cultural influences

(b) Provide an elaborate note on the classification of suicides with contemporary examples.

Emile Durkheim is known for his groundbreaking work on suicide. In his seminal work "Suicide: A Study
in Sociology", Durkheim introduced a comprehensive classification of suicides based on his analysis of
social factors that influence individual behaviour. His theory focused on the idea that suicide is not solely
an individual act, but is strongly influenced by societal forces and social integration. Durkheim's
classification of suicides includes four types: egoistic, altruistic, anomic, and fatalistic. Let's explore each
type along with contemporary examples.

Egoistic Suicide:

 Egoistic suicide occurs when an individual feels detached or isolated from society, leading to a
weakened sense of belonging. Durkheim argued that strong social integration acts as a
protective factor against this type of suicide. People who experience egoistic suicide may lack
strong social connections, such as close family ties, friendships, or community involvement.
 Example: Social media has become a significant influence on modern society. Some
individuals may experience egoistic suicide due to a sense of isolation stemming from
comparing their lives to idealized versions presented on social media platforms. The pressure
to conform to online standards and the absence of genuine human connections can contribute
to feelings of detachment and isolation.
Altruistic Suicide:

 Altruistic suicide occurs when an individual's commitment to a group or community is so

strong that they are willing to sacrifice their own lives for the benefit of others. This type of
suicide is often observed in highly cohesive and tightly knit societies.
 Example: In certain extreme religious or ideological groups, members may commit altruistic
suicide as an act of martyrdom, believing that their sacrifice will bring honour or advancement
to their cause. Suicide bombers who carry out attacks with the intention of promoting a

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 11

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

particular agenda can be seen as examples of altruistic suicide.

Anomic Suicide:

 Anomic suicide occurs during periods of significant social disruption, such as economic
upheaval or rapid societal changes. It results from a breakdown of social norms, values, and
regulations that provide individuals with a sense of purpose and guidance.
 Example: The global financial crisis of 2008 led to increased rates of anomic suicide in some
regions. As people lost their jobs, homes, and financial stability, the resulting uncertainty and
loss of societal structure contributed to feelings of hopelessness and despair. This is just one
example of how economic instability can lead to anomic suicide.

Fatalistic Suicide:

 Durkheim introduced the concept of fatalistic suicide less prominently than the other types. It
occurs when individuals feel trapped and oppressed by excessive regulations or societal
constraints, leading them to believe that death is their only escape.
 Example: In some cases, individuals who are subjected to extreme levels of oppression, such
as in highly authoritarian regimes or abusive situations, may resort to fatalistic suicide as a
way to regain control over their lives or escape unbearable circumstances.

Understanding these sociological concepts can aid in developing strategies to prevent and address
different types of suicides through targeted interventions focused on social integration, mental health
support, and addressing societal disruptions.

(c) How will you describe ‘employee alienation’ in services sector as a phenomenon?
Employee alienation refers to a feeling of disconnection, estrangement, or detachment experienced by
individuals in the workplace, particularly in the services sector. This phenomenon occurs when
employees perceive a lack of connection between their efforts, the outcomes of their work, and the
broader organizational or societal goals. Employee alienation can lead to reduced job satisfaction,
decreased motivation, and a sense of powerlessness among workers.

In the services sector, where interactions with customers and clients are frequent, employee alienation
can manifest in various ways –

 Powerlessness and Lack of Control:

o Employees might feel that they have little control over their work processes, decisions,
and outcomes. For example, in a customer service call centre, agents might be
required to follow strict scripts and protocols, limiting their ability to address unique
customer needs creatively.
 Meaninglessness:
o When employees cannot see the meaningful impact of their work, they may feel
disconnected from the purpose of their tasks. For instance, a fast-food worker who
prepares hundreds of meals per day might struggle to find meaning in their repetitive
actions.
 Isolation and Estrangement:
o In service-oriented roles, employees often have to deal with a high volume of
interactions, yet these interactions might be superficial and transactional. This can
lead to feelings of isolation and a lack of authentic social connection. A retail cashier

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 12

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com
MOKSHA 2025 BEGINNERS TEST 3 - KEY

who interacts with hundreds of customers daily but rarely engages in deeper
conversations might experience this.

 Alienation from the Product:

o In the services sector, employees might feel detached from the final product or service
they are providing. For instance, a software developer working on a small component of
a larger software package might struggle to see the overall impact of their work on the
end-users.
 Exploitation and Dissonance:
o If employees feel that their efforts are not appropriately recognized or compensated,
they may experience a sense of exploitation. For example, waitstaff in a restaurant
might feel disconnected when they receive inadequate tips despite providing excellent
service.
 Lack of Autonomy:
o The services sector often involves adhering to standardized procedures and guidelines.
This can lead to a lack of autonomy, where employees feel constrained by rigid rules.
For example, a hotel receptionist might be required to follow a fixed check-in procedure
without the flexibility to accommodate unique guest situations.
 Emotional Labour:
o Employees in service roles are often expected to manage their emotions to maintain a
positive customer experience. This emotional labour can lead to a sense of
inauthenticity and detachment from their true feelings. Flight attendants, for instance,
might have to maintain a cheerful demeanour even when dealing with difficult
passengers.

 Deskilling:
o As some service jobs become highly specialized and routinized, employees might find
themselves performing repetitive tasks that require little skill or creativity. This can
lead to a sense of deskilling, where employees feel underutilized and undervalued.

Addressing employee alienation in the services sector requires organizations to focus on factors such
as job design, employee involvement in decision-making, recognition and rewards, opportunities for
skill development, and creating a sense of shared purpose. By acknowledging and addressing these
aspects, organizations can foster a more engaged and motivated workforce in the services sector.

CHENNAI |DELHI |BENGALURU|THIRUVANANTHAPURAM|HYDERABAD 13

www.shankariasacademy.com | www.iasparliament.com