International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)

E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

Design and Development of Automated

Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm
System
George Dela Daliva

Capiz State University- Roxas City, Main Campus

Abstract
In response to the critical need for fire and accident prevention in homes and establishments, this research
presents an automated electrical circuit fault protector with an alarm system. The device automatically
interrupts current flow upon detecting short circuits and overloads, safeguarding against potential hazards.
Objectives include assessing sensitivity to faults, evaluating wireless remote-control performance,
examining sound clarity, and ensuring voltage stability post-fault events. Equipped with a resettable
system, the device allows manual or remote control. Using a developmental research method, data
collection employed researcher-made observation and evaluation sheets. Thirty expert evaluators assessed
the device. Micro testing revealed that the device was sensitive to faults and automatically triggered the
alarm. With an overload rating of 1,500-3,000 watts, the device shuts off power automatically after the
overload occurs and back to normal with a stable voltage once the problem was fixed, though this device
was primarily designed only for micro-testing this device was customizable to user needs. Its alarm system
boasts an audible range of up to 20 meters the same is through with remote control operation. Overall, the
device effectively detects faults, incorporates an audible alarm, and supports remote operation, serving as
a crucial safety measure against electrical mishaps and very acceptable in terms of design, composition,
safety, and operating performance.

Keyword: Automated electrical circuit fault protector, alarm system, electrical safety, fault detection,
short circuit, overload, wireless remote control, alarm signal clarity, voltage stability, design, and
development.

INTRODUCTION
In today's world, where electrical appliances and systems are ubiquitous in both residential and
commercial settings, ensuring their safe and reliable operation is paramount (Abdelmoumene and
Bentarzi, 2020). Electrical faults, such as short circuits and overloads (Alcantara, et al. 2015; Akpeh and
Madueme, 2017; Alvarez, 2019; Ara et al, 2020, Blanke, et al., 2016; Bo-Rong et al., 2017), pose
significant risks ranging from property damage to potential threats to human life (IIEE, 2017). In response
to these challenges, the design and development of an automated electrical circuit fault protector with an
alarm system emerged as critical innovations aimed at enhancing electrical safety and performance.
Electrical faults, such as short circuits and overloads, pose significant threats to property, infrastructure,
and human safety. Traditional circuit protection mechanisms (Jovcic et al, 2018; Kishore, 2014, Lee et al.,
2022, Liu et al., 2019, Lyashkov et al., 2018, Madueme et al., 2021, , while effective to some extent, often

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 1

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

rely on manual intervention and may not provide timely responses to rapidly evolving fault scenarios. By
incorporating advanced sensing technologies and alarm systems, an automated electrical circuit fault
protector with an alarm system offers a proactive approach to electrical safety. The system can detect and
respond to faults swiftly, minimizing the potential for damage and mitigating safety hazards. Moreover,
the integration of a wireless remote control (Chen, 2021; Delgado et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2017; Jiangun
et al., 2020), Mbumwe, 2017; Sharifu et al., 2014; Woodford, 2016) enhances user convenience and
accessibility, allowing for remote operation and monitoring of the system from a distance.
According to the current state of the art in this field, traditional circuit breakers are still widely used today
for power-system protection Eaton created the Arc Fault Detection Device (AFDD) in 2016 to provide
enhanced protection against electric arcs (Madueme et al., 2021), leakage current (Murty, 2017),
overcurrent (Lu et al., 2021), short circuits (Sheng, 2019; Institute of Integrated Electrical Engineers of
the Philippines, 2017) and overvoltage the circuit breakers were usually installed as the protection (Yuan
et al., 2022; Hodgson et al., 2022). An electrical circuit breaker (White, 2015; Xiao et al., 2023; Gorjian
and Shukla, 2020; Lin et al., 2022) is a switching device that can be used to control and protect an electrical
power system both manually and automatically. The new developed design and development of
Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System is an automatically operated electrical
device designed to protect an electrical circuit from damage caused by short circuit (Jijjun et al., 2017;
Khan et al., 2022). Stutz’s invention was the forerunner of the modern thermal-magnetic breaker
commonly used in household load centers to this day (Alharbi and Habiballah, 2020). Electrical problem
represent about 25% of the issue on power circuit breakers (White, 2022). Despite this point, however,
electricity is inherently quite volatile, and so it must be precisely contained and planned for, and potential
risks must be mitigated (Kabeyi and Olanrewaju, 2022) the most popular and common of which is a circuit
breaker (Paynter, 2021). This is often colloquially called a “breaker trip” or “tripping a breaker” and it
commonly happens when appliances or equipment acts up or too many high-power draw tools are placed
(plugged into) a single circuit (Mitra and Chowdhury, 2017).
Fuses and breakers serve the same purpose overall, though breakers in many cases have overtaken fuses
(Liu et al., 2019). In some cases disconnects are also fitted with a fuse (fusible disconnects) to provide
further protection, though these also require the fuse be changed out in the event of an electrical issue
(Shah et al., 2020).Medium voltage DC or MVDC system architectures are being considered in
distribution systems of electric ships as well as electric vehicles (Tessarolo et al., 2013).
Existing and proposed techniques for interrupting DC fault current utilize electromechanical interrupters,
solid-state switches, and combinations of both technologies (Gharehpetian et al., 2021). On the other hand,
solid-state circuit breakers (SSCBs) make use of power electronic switches for interrupting the current
without arcing (Mohammadi et al, 2020).
Even though this type of circuit breaker allows for very high interruption speeds, existing protection
methods implemented on protection relays typically do not utilize this attractive feature (Sharifabadi and
Norrga, 2015).
An electrical fault detector system an invention of Haun et al. (2015) detects electrical faults in an electrical
distribution system by monitoring one or more conductors and producing an input signal representing one
or more electrical signal conditions in the circuit to be monitored. Various mathematical models of power
electronic devices and circuits are used of simulation purposes (Gwatidzo and Akindeji, 2023).
Due to the assumptions taken in the AVM approach, these models are applicable only for rectifiers with
high filter inductance in case of large signal studies (He et al., 2020). The Fault Current Interruption Using

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 2

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

AC Circuit Breakers was the impulse current from the capacitor can be mitigated by adding a series
inductor in the fault current path. (Cao et al., 2023). The Zhang et al. (2021) automatic fault alarming
system for power grid dispatching invention belongs to the technical field of the grid, in particular to a
fault alarm dispatching automation system. The study of Heirung and Mesbah (2019) reliably diagnosing
faults and malfunctions has become increasingly challenging in modern technical systems because of their
growing complexity as well as increasingly stringent requirements on safety, availability, and high-
performance operation. Various fault detection techniques were explored, ranging from traditional
methods like overcurrent protection to advanced techniques such as arc fault detection. These techniques
leverage sensors, algorithms, and signal processing to detect and respond to different types of electrical
faults promptly.

METHODOLOGY
This study used a cross sectional developmental method of research. Developmental research is defined
as the systematic study of designing, developing, and evaluating products, processes, and products that
must meet criteria of internal consistency and effectiveness (Budwig and Alexander, 2021). This cross-
sectional developmental designing was used to examine the behavior of the device in different types of
simulated troubles in electrical system as well as its behavior dealing with electrical troubles and wireless
system operation. The design product was subjected to rigorous trials, testing, calibration, observation,
and evaluation to meet the desired outcome. The internal and external working condition of the automated
electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system has been manipulated/simulated such as short circuit
and overload and based on scientific experimentation so that the observer can identify the variables been
tested. The alarm system has been installed in order to inform the users of untoward incidents in their
electrical system. The performances in terms of the design, construction, operating performance and
safety of the product were based on an evaluation sheet used with the direct observation of the evaluators
of the product. This device was anchored from the circuit breaker to protect the circuit from the short
circuit. This device can be used as a portable circuit protector for any use such as installation and
troubleshooting, to automatically isolate the circuit from the fault.
Before the device was made the researcher gather detailed requirements for the fault protector and alarm
system, including detection sensitivity, wireless remote control range, sound clarity, voltage stability, and
safety standards compliance and the performance metrics was defined for each objective to ensure clear
evaluation criteria. Then the conceptual design for the fault protector and alarm system was designed based
on the identified requirements and objectives and the overall architecture, component selection, and
integration of fault detection, alarm generation, and wireless remote control functionalities was designed.
Then after that the suitable components such as sensors, microcontrollers, wireless transceivers, alarm
devices, and voltage regulators was selected based on performance, compatibility, and cost considerations.
Then the selected components into a cohesive system design was integrated, ensuring compatibility and
interoperability.
Furthermore, the prototype of the automated electrical circuit fault protector with the alarm system was
built based on the conceptual design and the fault detection algorithm, alarm logic, wireless remote-control
functionality, and voltage stabilization mechanism in the prototype was implemented then initial testing
was conducted to verify the functionality and performance of individual components and subsystems.

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 3

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

Legend:
1. Main Power Source
2. Remote Control Receiver Module 11. Digital monitor display kilowatt hour meter
3. Red LED standby power source indicator 12. Automatic transfer switching timer controller
4. Green LED general system power indicator 13. Green reset push button switch
5. Yellow LED power output indicator 14. Red trip push button switch
6. Red LED fault power indicator 15. Miniature circuit breaker
7. Fault alarm system indicator 16. Convenience outlet output terminal
8. Digital monitor display temperature level 17. Wireless handy remote control
9. Magnetic contactor 18. Voltage stabilizer digital monitor
10. Step-down power transformer 19. R1 and R2 electromechanical Relay

Figure 1. Block diagram of the developed automated electrical circuit fault protector with
alarm system.

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 4

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

Legend:
1. Fault power indicator
2. Power output indicator (220VAC)
3. General system power indicator
4. Standby power source 220VAC indicator
5. Digital monitor kWH meter
6. Door lock
7. Digital temperature display monitor
8. Fault alarm system
9. Digital fault push button
10. Digital reset push button
Figure 2. The front panel and manual controls of the developed automated electrical circuit
fault protector with alarm system.

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 5

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

Legend:
11. Terminal block
12. Digital voltmeter monitor
13. Relay (220VAC)
14. Remote control module
15. Circuit breaker
16. Tools compartment
17. Automatic on/off circuit controller
18. Power step-down transformer 220VAC to 12VDC
19. Magnetic controller (30A)
Figure 3. Internal parts and layout of the developed automated electrical circuit fault protector
with alarm system.

The prototype has been tested with the use of experimental setups to evaluate the sensitivity of the fault
protector to short circuits and overloads and experiments under controlled conditions to simulate various
fault scenarios and measure the system's response and alarm activation. The data was collected using
researcher-made observation sheets on the sensitivity of the wireless remote control at different distances
and assess sound clarity at varying distances from the alarm device. The experimental data was analyzed
to determine the sensitivity of the fault protector to short circuits and overloads. This includes the wireless
remote control's performance in terms of signal strength and reliability at different distances, sound clarity
of the alarm system at varying distances and analyze any degradation in performance and the stability of
the voltage output after a short circuit event and compare it to predefined criteria.
To further verify the acceptability of the device in terms of design, construction, operating performance,
and safety the researcher conducts an evaluation to 30 experts such as electrical and mechanical engineers,
electrical and electronics professors and instructors, industry professionals, and target consumers to gather
feedback and overall satisfaction with the device using 5-Point Likert Scale. The performance of the
automated electrical circuit fault protector with the alarm system against predefined acceptance criteria
was validated to ensure it comply with relevant safety standards and regulations governing electrical
devices and installations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Sensitivity of the Automated Electrical
Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm
System in terms of Short Circuit
Table 1 disclosed that the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system was sensitive in
terms of simulated scenario using wire plugged into the outlet as man-made trouble, and the device
automatically responded to the fault circuit and the alarm this means that this device feature a good
sensitivity that can detect short circuits at their earliest stages, often before they escalate into more serious
issues. Early detection was crucial for preventing damage to the electrical components and minimizing
downtime. The system was able to precisely identify the location and nature of the short circuit within the
electrical circuitry. This allows for targeted isolation of the faulty section and quicker restoration of normal
operation. While it was important for the system to be sensitive to actual short circuits, it also had a low
false alarm rate. False alarms can lead to unnecessary disruptions and decrease the trustworthiness of the
system. The sensitivity of the system was adjustable and adaptable to different operating conditions and

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 6

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

environments. It can maintain high sensitivity without being overly susceptible to interference or noise.
The fault protector's sensitivity was seamlessly integrated with the alarm system. When a short circuit was
detected, the alarm was triggered promptly to alert operators or users, allowing them to take appropriate
action. This means that the device was reliable to detect short circuits under various circumstances,
providing an added layer of safety and protection to the electrical system.

Table 1. Sensitivity of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System in
terms of Short Circuit.

Sensitivity of the automated

Short circuit Fault
device in terms of short circuit

Trials Mean
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Simulated scenario
using wire plugged
Short 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
into the outlet as sensitive
man-made trouble.

Legend:
1 - Sensitive -if the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system device alarm and detect
the short circuit and over load.
0-not sensitive -if the automated electrical circuit fault with alarm system device will not respond nor
alarm

Sensitivity of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System when Overload
Occurred
Table displayed the sensitivity of the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system when
overload occurred. The device responded when an overload occurred at 2,000 watts or higher. However,
it did not respond when different electrical devices within wattage ratings of 100 watts to 1,200 watts were
plugged into the device. However, when electrical appliances with wattage of 2,000 watts and higher were
plugged, the device responded and became “Sensitive” in detecting overloading. The device includes
adjustable settings and parameters that allow users to set the threshold for overloading based on their
specific requirements.
This involves adjusting voltage levels, current limits, or other parameters relevant to the detection and
management of overloads. It has also had external controls or interfaces that enable users to adjust its
settings or configuration to accommodate different wattage levels. This includes physical controls, digital
interfaces, and communication protocols for remote configuration. It also allows for easy expansion or
upgrading to support higher wattage levels in the future. This ensures that the device can grow with the
changing needs of the user or application.

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 7

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

Table 2. Sensitivity of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System when
Overload Occurred

Mean
LOAD Wattage Trials Remarks
1 2 3
1865W
Over current Electric motor 1 1 1 1 Sensitive
(2.5Hp)
protection
Portable
Welding 2000W 1 1 1 1 Sensitive
machine

Legend:
1 – Sensitive -if the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system, alarm and detect the
over load circuit.
0-not Sensitive -if the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system has not response nor
alarm.

Sensitivity of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System
Terms of wireless Remote Control with Four Varying Distances
Table 3 showed the sensitivity to the wireless remote control with four varying distances in meters the
design and development of automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system is sensitive up to
20 meters distance. The device can effectively receive signals from the remote-control device even when
operating at the farthest distance specified. This ensures that users can trigger the fault protector and alarm
system from anywhere within the designated range. The sensitivity of the system remains consistent across
all specified distances. Regardless of whether the user was close to or far away from the electrical circuit,
it was able to rely on the remote control to activate the protector and alarm system without issues. A
sensitive system able to filter out interference from other wireless devices or environmental factors that
disrupted signal transmission. This ensures that the remote control remains effective and reliable even in
challenging conditions. Ideally, the sensitivity of the system was adjustable to accommodate different
environmental conditions and user preferences. This allows users to fine-tune the sensitivity based on
factors such as signal strength, distance, and potential sources of interference. While maintaining
sensitivity, the system was able to optimize battery life in both the remote-control device and the receiver
unit. This ensures long-term usability without frequent battery replacements or recharging. The remote
control's sensitivity was seamlessly integrated with the fault protector and alarm system. Upon receiving
a signal from the remote control, the system promptly activates the necessary protocols to protect the
electrical circuit and alert users of any faults.

Table 3. Sensitivity of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm
System Terms of wireless Remote Control with Four Varying Distances

Remote control with four varying

Trials (in meters) MEAN Remarks
distances
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 8

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

5 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sensitive
10 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sensitive
15 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sensitive
20 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sensitive

Legend:
1- Sensitive -if the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system can be respond in
four (4) varying distances
0-Not Sensitive -if the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system cannot be respond
in four varying distances

Operating Performance of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System
in Terms of Sound Clarity In Four Varying Distances
Table 4 revealed the operating performance, the sound clarity of the alarm of the design and development
of automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system was audible from 5 to 20-meter distances.
The alarm system produces clear and distinguishable sounds that effectively alert users to potential faults
or issues within the electrical circuit. This includes ensuring that the alarm tones were audible and
recognizable, even in noisy environments. Regardless of the distance from the alarm system, the sound
clarity remains consistent. Users were able to clearly hear and understand the alarm signals whether they
were near or far from the system. The system offers volume adjustment capabilities to accommodate
different distances and environments. Users were able to increase or decrease the volume of the alarm to
suit their preferences and needs. Consideration was given to the directionality of the sound emitted by the
alarm system. This ensures that the alarm signals were effectively directed towards the intended recipients,
minimizing the risk of missed alerts. The alarm system has an integrated distance sensors to automatically
adjust the volume or sound clarity based on the user's proximity to the system. This ensures optimal
performance across varying distances without requiring manual intervention. The system provides
feedback to users to indicate successful activation of the alarm and acknowledgment of the fault detection.
This feedback helps reassure users that the system was functioning properly, even at a distance.

Table 4. Operating Performance of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm
System in Terms of Sound Clarity in Four Varying Distances.

Sound clarity in
four varying
Trials (in meters)
distances
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MEAN Remarks

5 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clear
10 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clear
15 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clear
20 meters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clear

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 9

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

Legend:
1-Clear -if the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system can be heard in four (4)
varying distances
0-Not Clear -if the automated electrical circuit fault protector with alarm system cannot be heard in four
varying distances

Stability of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System in terms of
Voltage after Short Circuit Occurred
Table 5 displayed thee stability of automated electrical circuit fault protector with an alarm system after a
short circuit was stable after the short circuit occurred this was due to design of the circuit that plays a
crucial role in its stability with appropriate components and protection mechanisms maintains stability
after a short circuit and the fault protector was capable of quickly detecting the short circuit and isolating
the faulty section of the circuit. This helps prevent further damage and ensures the stability of the rest of
the system. The response time of the fault protector was critical and able to react swiftly to the short circuit
and minimize the impact on the system's stability coupled with an effective voltage regulation system
which can help maintain stability by ensuring that the voltage levels remain within safe limits even after
a short circuit occurs. After the short circuit was resolved, an automatic reset mechanism helped restore
the system to its normal operating state, further enhancing its stability.

Table 5. Stability of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System in
Terms of Voltage after Short Circuit Occurred
Stability of the voltage after Trials
short circuit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean Remarks
Tested
Test Instrument
voltage
Analog Multi-
219 Volt 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Stable
Tester
Legend:
1-Stable -if the measured voltage does not show fluctuation and within the working voltage level
condition
0-Not stable- if the measured voltage show fluctuation and not within the working voltage level condition

Acceptability of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System in Terms of
Design, Construction, Operating Performance, and Safety
Table 6 showed the acceptability of the design and development of automated electrical circuit fault
protector with alarm system in terms of design, construction, operating performance and safety was “Very
Acceptable.” Overall, the acceptability of an automated electrical circuit fault protector with an alarm
system hinges on its design, construction, operating performance, and safety features. A well-designed,
robustly constructed, reliable, and safety-compliant system was more likely to be accepted and trusted by
users in various applications, ranging from residential and commercial settings to industrial environments.
Regular maintenance, testing, and adherence to best practices further enhance its acceptability and
effectiveness over time.

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 10

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

Table 6. Acceptability of the Automated Electrical Circuit Fault Protector with Alarm System in
Terms of Design, Construction, Operating Performance, and Safety.
Acceptability Mean Verbal Interpretation
Design 4.85 Very Acceptable
Construction 4.80 Very Acceptable
Operating performance 4.87 Very Acceptable
Safety 4.89 Very acceptable
Grand Mean 4.85 Very Acceptable
Legend:
Range Verbal Interpretation
4.21-5.00 Very Acceptable
3.41-4.20 Acceptable
2.61-3.40 Moderately Acceptable
1.81-2.60 Less Acceptable
1.00-1.80 Least Acceptable

Conclusions
Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn:
The device exhibited sensitivity in detecting short circuits and overloads, effectively responding to
simulated scenarios. However, there were limitations in sensitivity for detecting lower wattage loads,
particularly in the range of 100 to 1,200 watts.
The wireless remote control demonstrated sensitivity across varying distances, allowing for convenient
operation up to 20 meters from the device. Users can control the automated electrical circuit fault protector
with ease from a distance of up to 20 meters, allowing for flexibility in placement and usage within a room
or building. It also eliminates the need for users to physically interact with the device, enhancing
convenience, especially in situations where the device is installed in hard-to-reach or inaccessible areas.
By enabling operation from a distance, the wireless remote control enhances safety by reducing the need
for users to approach potentially hazardous electrical environments to manually control the device. Users
can quickly and efficiently manage the device without the need to navigate through physical obstacles or
wiring, saving time and effort in operation and maintenance tasks. The ability to control the device from
a distance opens possibilities for various applications and environments, including residential,
commercial, and industrial settings, where convenient operation is essential.
The device's alarm system provided clear and audible alerts within distances ranging from 5 to 20 meters,
ensuring effective communication of fault occurrences. The clear and audible alerts ensure that users were
promptly informed of any fault occurrences, allowing for immediate action to be taken to address the
issue. By effectively communicating fault occurrences, the alarm system enhances safety by alerting users
to potential hazards such as short circuits or overloads, enabling them to take necessary precautions or
evacuate the area if needed. The audible alerts can be heard within a wide range of distances, ensuring that
users throughout the vicinity were made aware of any faults, regardless of their location relative to the
device. The reliability of the alarm system provides users with peace of mind, knowing that they will be
alerted to any electrical faults even if they are not in close proximity to the device. Lastly, the ability of
the alarm system to communicate effectively within a range of distances makes the device suitable for
various environments, from small residences to large commercial or industrial facilities.

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 11

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

The device provides stable voltage and free from fluctuation after the automatic reset and the voltage
stability was maintained post short circuit events, with the voltage remaining stable and within normal
working levels. The advantage of maintaining voltage stability post short circuit events, with the voltage
remaining stable and within normal working levels, was crucial for ensuring uninterrupted power supply
and preventing damage to electrical equipment The stable voltage levels prevent voltage fluctuations that
can damage sensitive electrical equipment, such as computers, appliances, and industrial machinery,
thereby extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance costs. Thus, maintaining stable voltage levels
ensures that electrical devices continue to operate smoothly even after a short circuit event, minimizing
downtime and ensuring uninterrupted productivity in industrial or commercial settings. The consistent
voltage levels reduce the risk of electrical hazards, such as fires or electrocution, which can occur due to
voltage surges or fluctuations resulting from short circuits. Likewise, stable voltage levels promote energy
efficiency by ensuring that electrical equipment operates optimally within its specified voltage range,
thereby reducing energy wastage and lowering utility costs. The assurance of voltage stability post short
circuit events instills confidence in users, knowing that their electrical system can withstand unexpected
faults and continue to function reliably.
Overall, the device was deemed "Very Acceptable" in terms of design, construction, operating
performance, and safety. User satisfaction and confidence were high, indicating that the device met or
exceeded expectations in terms of its functionality and safety features.

Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study the following recommendations are forwarded:
The automated device can be used and the magnetic relay, ac plug, convenience outlet, magnetic contactor,
and others electrical parts, electrical wires the change after one (1) year of use in order to maintain and
improve the sensitivity of the design and development of automated electrical fault circuit protector with
alarm system.
In terms of operating short and overload circuit occurrence, the magnetic contactor be used to increase the
current capacity of the automated device was recommended a larger buzzer for farther distance and audible
alarm may also be provided. And another recommendation to convert the automated device from single
phase to three phase line.
The device casing and cord may be cleaned using unused paint brush and slightly damp cloth before using
this device, examine the cords wires connection contactor relay for any damage and replace it if necessary.
Based on the importance of safety and reliability in electrical systems there was a need to evaluate safety
standards to ensure that the protector complies with relevant safety standards and regulations to guarantee
the highest level of safety for personnel and equipment.
Consider compatibility to choose a system that is compatible with the specific electrical circuitry,
appliances, and equipment in your application to ensure seamless integration and optimal performance so
there was a need to modify the system that should be within the specific wattage that the user need to
energize.
Prioritize systems known for their reliability in fault detection and alarm activation to minimize the risk
of false alarms or missed faults and look for a system with fast response times to detect faults promptly
and initiate protective actions to mitigate potential hazards quickly.
Consider systems with remote monitoring and control capabilities, allowing operators to manage the
system from a distance and receive real-time alerts about faults and select a system that is easy to install,

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 12

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

operate, and maintain to minimize downtime and ensure efficient operation.

Choose a system that can accommodate future expansion or modifications to the electrical system to
ensure long-term viability and flexibility that has Opt for a system from a reputable manufacturer that
offers comprehensive support and service options to address any issues or concerns that may arise during
installation or operation.
Lastly, since the device was cost-effectiveness it balance the initial investment cost with the long-term
benefits and savings associated with enhanced safety, reliability, and reduced downtime.
By considering these recommendations, you can select an automated electrical circuit fault protector with
an alarm system that meets your specific safety, reliability, and operational requirements.

REFERENCES
1. Abdelmoumene, A. and Bentarzi, H. (2020). Handbook of Research on Emerging Technologies for
Electrical Power Planning, Analysis, and Optimization Qatar Airways Group – HIA
2. Ahmed, M.M., Ahmed, E. and Ahmmed, K.T. (2013). Automated Irrigation Control and Security
System with Wireless Messaging. International Conference on Informatics, Electronic and Vision
(ICIEV), Dhaka doi: 10.119/ICIEV.2013.6572595
3. Akpeh, V.A. and Madueme, T.C. (2017). Circuit Breaker Cost Reduction Technique: Guide forthe
Manufacture of Minimum Cost Circuit Breakers. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of
Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Innovation & Research Volume 6,
Issue 4, ISSN: 2277– 5668
4. Alharbi, K. and Habiballah, I. (2020). “Review on Circuit Breakers” International Journal of
Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) http://www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181
IJERTV9IS110133 www.ijert.org Vol. 9 Issue 11
5. Alcantara, G.O., Duey, J.G.G., Morada, J.S., and Mancilla, A.M. (2015). Improvement of Main Circuit
Breaker System’s Reliability at Automotive Air-Conditioning Technology of the Philippines. Letran
Calamba Research Report vol. 2 no. 1
6. Alvarez, G.P. (2019). Real-Time Fault Detection and Diagnosis Using Intelligent Monitoring and
Supervision Systems. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90158. Version of Record:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578819300070
Manuscript_d8d1773fd9c21bfd3a7321b39b144d0c
7. Ara, R., Khan, U.A., Bhatti, A.I., and Lee, A.W. (2020). A Reliable Protection Scheme for Fast DC
Fault Clearance in a VSC-Based Meshed MTDC Grid.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993001
8. Bayliss, C.R. and Hardy, B.J. (2015). Fuses and Miniature Circuit Breakers: Transmission and
Distribution Electrical Engineering. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-096912-1.00011-3
9. Blanke, M., Kinnaert, M., Lunze, J., and Staroswiecki, M. (2016). Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant
Control. Springer, Second Edition, 2016.
10. Bo-Rong H., Chih-Hong, K., Jhen-Lu Z. and Hsiung-Cheng L. (2017). A Circuit Design to Protect
Current Surge for Unmanned Factories Aeronautical Systems Research Division, NCSIST, No.300-5,
LN.277, Sian St., Seatwen Dist., Taichung 407, Taiwan R.O.C. b International School of Technology
and Management

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 13

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

11. Cao, S., Junaid, M., Zhao, J., Yu, D. and Wang, J. (2023). Parameter Optimization of TP KEMA model
for Liquid Nitrogen arc by Heuristics Algorithms", IEEE International Conference on Applied
Superconductivity and Electromagnetic Devices (ASEMD), pp.1-2
12. Cavas, M. and Baballe, M.A. (2019). A Review Advancement of Security Alarm System Using
Internet of Things (IoT) International Journal of New Computer Architectures and their Applications
9(02):38-49 DOI:10.17781/P002617
13. Chen, Y. (2021). Research on Application System of Remote-Control Computer of Android Mobile
Phone. CETCE 2021 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1992 (2021) 022169 IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022169 College of Internet of Things, Jiangxi Teachers College, JTC,
Yingtan, 335000, China
14. Chen, X.J.; Ji, Y.; Shen, G.Q., Gao, H.J., Wei, Z.B. and Gou, J. (2014). Design of architecture of
intelligent dispatch support system of regional power grid. Guangdong Electr Power
15. Clapham, B., Gomber, P., Haferkorn, M and Panz, S. (2017). Managing Excess Volatility: Design and
Effectiveness of Circuit Breakers; SAFE Working Paper No. 195; 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal
16. Delgado, R.A., Picking, R. and Grout, V. (2013). Remote-Controlled Home Automation System with
Different Network Technologies. University of Wales, Wrexham, UK
17. Denomme, D. and Wood, D. (2022). Fuse vs. Circuit Breaker | Overview, Differences & Uses. Physics
Science online textbook Study.com
18. Du, Y., J. Deng, H. Lin, H. Zheng, K. Xiang and Y. Shen (2019). “Research and experiment of a
current-limiting HVDC circuit breaker,” in The Journal of Engineering, vol. no. 16, pp. 2002-2006, 3
2019, doi: 10.1049/joe.2018.8724.
19. Eaton Corp. (2016) EPRI, Eaton Commence Field Test of Innovative Circuit Breaker Technology
Seeking to Demonstrate More Intelligent, Responsive Grid and Smarter Homes Retrieved from
https://www.eaton.com/tw/en-us/company/news-insights/news-releases/2016/EPRI-eaton-
commence-field-test-of-innovative-circuit-breaker.html
20. Gómez, J. C., D. Toum, C. Reineri, and F. Romero (2021). "Fuses in distribution systems: new
applications in DC circuits." Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal 19 : 441–46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.24084/repqj19.314.
21. Gorjian, S. and Shukla, A. (2020). Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion Technologies, Applications
and Environmental Impacts. ISBN 978-0-12-819610-6 DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-05265-
2
22. He, J., Arvin, T., and Weise, N. (2020). Modeling and Simulation of an Ultra-Fast Resonant DC Circuit
Breaker Based on Current Source Module", 2020 IEEE 9th International Power Electronics and
Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2020-ECCE Asia)
23. Heirung, A.N. and Mesbah, A. (2019). Input Design for Active Fault Diagnosis. Department of
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
24. Hodgson, M., Dickerson, S., and Rizzo, P. (2022). Low-Power Actuation Methods for Highly
Nonlinear Solitary Wave Transducers Used to Assess Human Eyes. In European Workshop on
Structural Health Monitoring. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
25. Ghadimi N., Sedaghat M., Azar K.K., Arandian B., Fathi G., Ghadamyari M. (2023) IET Generation,
Transmission & Distribution. An innovative technique for optimization and sensitivity analysis of a
PV/DG/BESS based on converged Henry gas solubility optimizer: a case study.

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 14

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

26. Gharehpetian, G.B., Baghaee, H.R., Shabestary, M.M. (2021). Microgrids and Methods of Analysis.
Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier; ISBN: 978-0-12-816172-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-
12-816172-2.12001-2
27. Ghiasi M., Wang Z., Mehrandezh M., Alhelou H.H., Ghadimi N. (2023). A new fast bus tripping
system design of protection relay in an AC power network. IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging
Technologies (GlobConET) IEEE
28. Goel, P., Datta, A. and Manna M.S. (2017). Industrial alarm systems: Challenges and opportunities.
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries; Volume 50, Part A, Pages 23-36;
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.09.001 Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/article/abs/pii/S0950423017306320
29. Gwatidzo, N., Akindeji, K.T., Kabeya, M., and Kaminickas, M. (2023). Industrial Level 100 MW RE
Grid Connection Preliminary Technical Feasibility Study", IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica
30. Haun, A.A.; Coats, A.G.; Wong, K.B.; Dvorak, R.F. and Scott, G.W. (2015). Electrical fault detection
system. US6246556B1 Patent
31. Huang, J.H.; Gu, B.;Liu, F.; Tang, S.; and You, Y. (2017). The Research on Remote Control
Technology of Power System Operation Cockpit Based on Application Virtualization
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.776 Energy Procedia Volume 105,retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article /pii/S1876610217308433
32. Heidary Yazdi S.S., Milimonfared J., Fathi S.H., Rouzbehi K. (2018). Optimal placement and control
variable setting of power flow controllers in multi-terminal HVDC grids for enhancing static
security. International Journal for Electrical Power Energy System. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.05.001.
33. Institute of Integrated Electrical Engineers of the Philippines (2017). 2016 q2 iiee magazine
https://issuu.com/iiee-qatar/docs/2016_q2_iiee_magazine
34. Isermann, R. (2016). Fault-Diagnosis Systems: An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault
Tolerance. Springer.
35. Jeong, Y., Lee, H., Kim, Y. and Lee, S. (2013). High-speed AC circuit breaker and high-speed OCR;
22nd International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2013) Date of
Conference: 10 June 2013 - 13 June 213. Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 16 December 2013. Electronic
ISBN:978-1-84919-732-8. DOI: 10.1049/cp.2013.0834. IET, Stockholm
36. Jianjun, L., Li, Z. and Mingyi, M. (2020). A New USB Home Appliances based on PC and Infrared
Remote Control Protocol. IEEE 2020 International Conference on Computer and communication
technologies in Agriculture Engineering, Chengdu
37. Jovcic, D., Jamshidifar, A., Popov, M. and Liu, S. (2018). Modelling and Comparison of Common
Functionalities of HVDC Circuit Breakers. IEEE 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General
Meeting (PESGM).
https://www.academia.edu/94507533/Modelling_and_Comparison_of_Common_Functionalities_of
_HVDC_Circuit_Breakers
38. Kabeyi, M.J. B. and Olanrewaju, O.A. (2022). Sustainable Energy Transition for Renewable and Low
Carbon Grid Electricity Generation and Supply. REVIEW article; Front. Energy Research Sustainable
Energy Systems Volume 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114
39. Kettner, L. (2017). Fast automatic level of detail for physically based materials. SIGGRAPH '17: ACM
SIGGRAPH 2017 Talks Article No.: 39 https://doi.org/10.1145/3084363.3085062

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 15

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

40. Khan, F., Xu, Z., Sun, J., Khan, F.M., Ahmed, A. and Zhao, Y. (2022). Recent Advances in Sensors
for Fire Detection Sensors (Basel).: 3310. doi: 10.3390/s22093310. PMCID: PMC9100504;
PMID: 35590999
41. Kiliçkiran H.C., Şengör İ., Akdemir H., Kekezoğlu B., Erdinç O., Paterakis N.G. (2018). Power system
protection with digital overcurrent relays: a review of non-standard characteristics. Electrical Power
System Research;164:89–102
42. Kishore, M.R. (2014). Different Types Of Fuses – Protection From Short Circuit Damages – A Bird’s
Eye View. IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE) e-ISSN: 2278-
1676,p-ISSN: 2320-3331, Volume 9, Issue 5 Ver. I , www.iosrjournals.org www.iosrjournals.org 44
43. Lee, J., Chae, W., Kim, W. and Choi, S. (2022). Control Strategy for Line Overload and Short Circuit
Current of Networked Distribution Systems. School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University,
Seoul 02841, Korea. Smart Power Distribution Laboratory, Distribution Planning Group, Korea
Electric Power Research Institute, Daejeon 34056, Korea. 14(7),
4208; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074208
44. Lin, K., Gurrola-Perez, P. and Spetch, B. (2022). Circuit breakers and market quality. World Exchange
Forum Retrieved from https://www.world-exchanges.org/storage/ app/media/US_Circuit _Breakers
_V20220914% 20w_Cover.pdf
45. Liu, S., Liu, Z., Chavez , J. D. J., & Popov, M. (2019). Mechanical DC circuit breaker model for real
time simulations. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 107, 110-
119.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.11.014
46. Liu, Z. (2015). Ultra-High Voltage AC/DC Grids. ISBN 978-0-12-802161-3. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-01327-5 Retrieved from https://www.science direct.com
/book/9780128021613/ultra-high-voltage-ac-dc-grids
47. Liu, W., Placke, T. and Chau, K.T. (2022). Overview of batteries and battery management for electric
vehicles. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.016 Energy Reports Volume 8
48. Lu, J., Tjia, M., Mullen, B., Cao, B., Lukasiewicz, K., Shah-Morales, S., and Zuo, Y. (2021). An
analog of psychedelics restores functional neural circuits disrupted by unpredictable stress. Molecular
psychiatry
49. Lu, T., Wang, L. and Chen, N. (2018). Research on EMS Alarm Analysis and Secondary Equipment
Status Evaluation. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 439(3):032113.
DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/439/3/032113
50. Lyashkov, A. Yu, A. S. Tonkoshkur, and S. F. Lyagushyn (2018). "Resettable fuses for overcurrent
protection in photovoltaic solar array systems." Journal of Physics and Electronics 26, no. 2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/331829.
51. Macangus-Gerrard, G. (2018). Offshore Electrical Engineering Manual. ISBN 978-0-12-385498-8
52. Madueme, V.C., Mbunwe, M.J., Madaueme, T.C., Ahmad, M.A., and Drugarin, C.V.A. (2021).
Operation of Circuit Breakers: Data and Analysis. Department of Electrical Engineering, University
of Nigeria Nsukka, 410001, Nigeria. Physics Department, Faculty of Science, P.O.Box 741, University
of Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Retrieved from
http://polipapers.upv.es/ index.php/ MUSE/Social and Technological Sciences e-ISSN: 2341-2593
53. Mbunwe, M. (2017). Design and Construction of a remote control switching device for household
appliances application. Advances in Science Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 2(4):154-
164. DOI:10.25046/aj020421. BY-SA 4.0

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 16

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

54. Meijer, G.C.M., Wang, G. and Heidary, A. (2018). Smart temperature sensors and temperature sensor
systems. Smart Sensors and MEMs (pp.57-85) DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-102055-5.00003-6 Retrieved
from https://www.research gate.net publication/ 323622487 Smart_temperature sensors and
temperature sensor_systems
55. Mitra, B. and Chowdhury, B. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Hybrid DC Breaker andAssembly
HVDC Breaker. Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of North Carolina
CharlotteCharlotte, USA. North American Power Symposium (NAPS)
https://www.academia.edu/101446154
Comparative_analysis_of_hybrid_DC_breaker_and_assembly_HVDC_breaker
56. Mohammad, A., Ul Amin, S.A.M.S., Mahmud, R., Hasan, R., Al-Imram, Abedin, F. (2017). Analysis
on Controlled Rectifier to Determine the Minimum Limit of Load Resistance for Proper Voltage
Regulation
57. Mohammadi, F., Rouzbehi, K., Hajian, M., Niayesh, K., Gharehpetian, G.B., Saad, H., Ali, M.H., and
Sood, V.K. (2020). HVDC Circuit Breakers: A Comprehensive
Review IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. XX, No. XX
58. Moharm, A. (2023). Electrical Short Circuits: Causes, Effects, and Prevention Electrical Engineer @
SAMMAN Engineering & Consulting | Electrical Design Expert
59. Mokhberdoran H., A. Carvalho, H. Leite and N. Silva (2014). “A review on HVDC circuit breakers,”
3rd Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2014), Naples, pp. 1-6, doi:
10.1049/cp.2014.0859.
60. Murty, P.S.R. (2017). Electrical Power Systems. ISBN 978-0-08-101124-9
61. Neeser, D. R. (2013). Short-circuit current ratings of equipment. In 49th IEEE/IAS Industrial &
Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (pp. 1-4). IEEE
62. Niaki, S. H. A., Chen, Z., Bak-Jensen, B., Sharifabadi, K., Liu, Z., & Hu, S. (2021). On Systematic
DC Fault-Ride-Through of Multi-terminal MMC-HVDC Grids. In 56th International Universities
Power Engineering Conference (UPEC): Powering Net Zero Emissions , UPEC 2021 – Proceedings
IEEE https://doi.org 10.1109/UPEC50034.2021.9548154
63. Park, S. H., Jang, H. J., Chong, J.K., and Lee, W. Y. (2015). Dynamic analysis of Thomson coil
actuator for fast switch of HVDC circuit breaker", 3rd International Conference on Electric Power
Equipment – Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST), pp.425-430
64. Paynter, R.T. (2021). Basic Electric Components and Meters,” in Introduction to Electricity, 1rst ed.
NJ: Prentice-Hall, ch. 3, sec. 3.6, pp. 98-107
65. Plesca, A. (2018). "Temperature Distribution of HBC Fuses with Asymmetric Electric Current Ratios
Through Fuselinks." Energies 11, no. 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11081990.
66. Pourseiedrezaei, M., Loghmani, A. and Keshmiri, M. (2021). Development of a Sound Quality
Evaluation Model Based on an Optimal Analytic Wavelet Transform and an Artificial Neural
Network. Mechanical Engineering Group, Pardis College, Isfahan University of Technology. DOI:
10.24425/aoa.2021.136560
67. Raza, A.; Mustafa, A.; Alquasemi, U.; Rouzbehi, K., Muzzammel, R.; Goubing, S.; Abbas, G. (2021).
HVDC circuit Breakers: Prospects and Challenges. Applied Science, Vol. 11, 5047
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115047
68. Regar, O.P., Kumar, P., Srivastava, G. and ldquo (2019). A Review on HVDC Circuit Breakers,
IJTSRD, Volume: 3, Issue: 3

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 17

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

69. Rode, M.A., Jadhav, M.V., Zade, B.S., Kakde, P.M., Mahajan, Y.S. and Hiwase, U.E. (2022). Study
and Analysis of Different Types of Circuit Breaker U.G. Students, Department of Electrical
Engineering IJARSCT ISSN (Online) 2581-9429 International Journal of Advanced Research in
Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT) Volume 2, Issue 1, April 2022 Copyright to
IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-3041 42
70. Sättele, M., Bründl, M, and Straub, D. (2015). Quantifying the effectiveness of early warning systems
for natural hazards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions 3(7):4479-4526 ;
DOI:10.5194/nhessd-3-4479-2015
71. Schiefen, D.R., and Winter, J.M. (1986). Circuit breaker with positive contact indication.
US4829147A. Schneider Electric USA Inc. Application US06/922,968 events 1986-10-24.
Publication of US4829147A. 2006-10-24 Anticipated expiration
72. Shah, F., Patel, R.J., Macwan, F. and Sinha, N. (2020). Simulation of Hybrid HVDC Circuit Breaker
with SFCL for fault Current Limiting; International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology
(IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 05 | www.irjet.net p-ISSN: Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/44230586/ IRJET_simulation_of_hybrid_hvdc_circuit
breaker_with_sfcl_for_fault_current_limiting
73. Shandilya, Sm., Shandilya Sh., Thakur, T., and Nagar, A. (2016). Electrical Faults in Power Systems.
DOI:10.4018/978-1-4666-9911-3.ch001
74. Sharifabadi, K. and Norrga, S. (2015). Power Electronics for HVDC Grids – an Overview; 21, rue
d’Artois, F-75008 PARIS Paper 164 LUND 2015
75. Sharifu I., Mia, B., Ahmmed, K.T. (2014). Wireless Remote Switching System for Controlling
Devices with an Algorithm based DTMF Detection. IEEE 2014 International Conference on Electrical
Engineering and Information and Communication Technology (ICEEICT), Dhaka
76. Sheng, R. (2019). Systems Engineering for Aerospace. A Practical Approach. ISBN 978-0-12-
816458-7. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-00485-5
77. Shi, Z. and Druzhininb, Z (2024). Development of 3-phase fault detection, protection, and automation
application with the present of DG in AC power system using GOOSE protocol. Heliyon. 2024 Mar
30; 10(6): e27482. Published online doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27482. PMCID: PMC10944219.
PMID: 38496855
78. Silva, O., Neil A., Solano, J.B., Petit Suárez, J.F., Plata, G.O. and Núñez, V.B. (2015). "A New
Method to Characterize Power Quality Disturbances Resulting from Expulsion and Current-Limiting
Fuse Operation." DYNA 82, no. 192: 177–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n192.48616.
79. Singh M., Agrawal A. (2019). Voltage–current–time inverse-based protection coordination of
photovoltaic power systems. IET Gener., Transm. Distrib.
80. Sun, J., Saeedifard, M., Ji, S., Zhu, L., Meliopoulos, A.P., and Graber, L. (2018). Reducing the Fault
Transient Magnitudes inMulti-terminal HVDC Grids by Sequential Tripping of Hybrid Circuit
Breaker Modules
81. Tessarolo, A., Castellan, S., Menis, R. and Sulligoi, G. (2013). Electric generation technologies for
all-electric ships with Medium-Voltage DC power distribution systems. Conference: Electric Ship
Technologies Symposium (ESTS), 2013 IEEE.
DOI:10.1109/ESTS.2013.6523746.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261522546_Electric_ge
neration_technologies_for_all-electric_ships_with_Medium-
Voltage_DC_power_distribution_systems

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 18

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

82. Varga, A. (2017). Solving Fault Diagnosis Problems. Linear Synthesis Techniques, volume 84 of
Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Springer.
83. Vasavada, M.R., Patel, V.S., and Prajapati, J.R. (2020). Development of Intelligent Automatic
Electronic MCB and ELCB Using Fault Diagnosis Technique. 2020 International Conference on
Power Electronics & IoT Applications in Renewable Energy and its Control (PARC).
DOI:10.1109/PARC49193.2020.236623
84. Venkatasubramanian, V., Kavuri, S.N. and Yin, K. (2018). A Review of Process Fault Detection and
Diagnosis Part III: Process History Based Methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering 27(3):327-
346. DOI:10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00162-X
85. Vinod, M., Devadasan, S.R., Rajanayagam, D., Sunil, D.T. and Thilak, V. (2018). Theoretical and
industrial studies on the electromechanical relay. International Journal Services and Operations
Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2018 Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328927190_Theoretical_and_industrial_studies_on_the_el
ectromechanical_relay
86. Wang, K., Hongwen, L., Qing, Y., Lu, Y., and Jisheng, H. (2019). "Impact Transient Characteristics
and Selection Method of Voltage Transformer Fuse." Energies 12, no. 4. 737.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en12040737.
87. Wenjuan, J., Wenhu, T., Qian, T., Tianyao, J., Lin, G., Yuqing, L., and Guojun, L. (2017). Fault
diagnosis of high-voltage circuit breakers using wavelet packet technique and support vector
machine,” IET
88. White, J.R. (2015). Circuit Breakers: A Technician's Guide to Low- and Medium-Voltage Circuit
Breakers. ISBN: 978-0-8269-1970-0
89. Woodford, C. (2016). How Remote Control and Radio Control Work retrieved from
www.explainthatstuff.com/remotecontrol.html
90. Xiao, Y., Wu, Y., Wu, Yi, Yang, F., Rong, M. and Yang Z. (2023). A fuse-based DC circuit breaker
with vacuum interrupter enhanced by an external transverse magnetic field. Associate Editor: Minfu
Liao; https://doi.org/10.1049/hve2.12380
91. Yang, Y., Sun, Y., Chen, M., Zhou, Y., Wang, R. and Liu, Z. (2022). Platform Development of BIM-
Based Fire Safety Management System Considering the Construction Site
DOI:10.3390/buildings12081268
92. Yanushkevich, A. and Belda, N.A. (2015). Transient system behaviour under DC fault conditions in
meshed HVDC system
93. Yin, J., Chen, G., Xu, H., Li, Q., Liu, J., and Li, P. (2017). Unified Power Flow Controller Technology
and Application. ISBN 978-0-12-813485-6
94. Ying, Z. (2016). Research on Design of Temperature Control System based on PLC. 2nd International
Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Informatics (AMEII 2016).
Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering, Chongqing 401331, China
95. Yuan, Z; Zhang, J.; Xin, W.; Ya, L.; Shiqing, S.; and Shuxiu, W. (2022). Research on a Control Method
and System of Circuit Breaker Life Test. ICITEE '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference
on Information Technologies and Electrical EngineeringNovember 2022Pages 270–
273https://doi.org/10.1145/3582935.3582978

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 19

 International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
E-ISSN: 2582-2160 ● Website: www.ijfmr.com ● Email: editor@ijfmr.com

96. Zhang, J., Lou, W., and Dai, Y. (2021). Integrated Diagnostic Framework for Process and Sensor
Faults in Chemical Industry. School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065,
China 21(3), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030822

IJFMR240320237 Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 20