The document discusses the concept of specific performance in contract law, outlining the circumstances under which contracts cannot be specifically enforced, such as when compensation in money is adequate or when contracts are dependent on personal qualifications. It also details various defenses that defendants can raise against specific performance claims, including absence of writing, uncertainty of terms, and lack of consideration. The document emphasizes that specific performance is a discretionary remedy granted by the court, primarily when monetary compensation is insufficient to address the breach of contract.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views9 pages
Specific Relief Acts
The document discusses the concept of specific performance in contract law, outlining the circumstances under which contracts cannot be specifically enforced, such as when compensation in money is adequate or when contracts are dependent on personal qualifications. It also details various defenses that defendants can raise against specific performance claims, including absence of writing, uncertainty of terms, and lack of consideration. The document emphasizes that specific performance is a discretionary remedy granted by the court, primarily when monetary compensation is insufficient to address the breach of contract.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
‘Contracts Which Cannot Be Specifically Enforced
'Q, Which contract cannot be specifically enforced?
‘Q, What are various defences which can be pleaded by a defendant, (2002) (2003)
(2004)
Q. Which contracts cannot be specifically enforced?
‘Q. What are various defeces which can be pleaded by a defendant. (2006/S)
1. Introduction:
‘Specific performance is an actual performance of a contract. the plaintiff is entitled to have the
‘specific thing wherefore he has contracted. there are some circumstances when a contract can
not be specifically enforced
According to Doemory:
‘Specific performance of contract consists in the contracting party is exact fulfillment of the
‘obligation which he has assumed in his doing or omitting the very act which he has undertaken
‘todo or not to do.
2. Relevant Provisions:
‘Sec. 20 and 21 of specific relief act.
3.General rule:
Itisa general rule that the plaintiff is entitled for the thing for which he has contract and court
‘can specifically enforce such contract
4, Case law:
19 CLC 625.
It was held that where a part of agreement can not be specifically perfumed such part being
interlined with the rest of agreement, then whole of the agreement would be hit by the same
disability.
‘5. Exceptions to general rule:
Exception to the general rule all contained in Sec. 21 all the specific relief act.
6. Contract which can not be specifically enforced:
Following are the contracts which can not be specifically enforced.|. Contracts where compensation is an adequate relie!
‘A contract for non-perfarmance of which compensation in money is an adequate relief.
Il, Contracts running into minute or numerous detail:
‘A contract which runs into such minute or numerous details
Ill. Contracts dependant upon personal qualification :
sation can not be enforced.
Acontract dependant upon personal qu
IV. Contracts dependent upon violation of the parties:
A contract dependent upon violation of the parties cannot he enforced
‘V. Uncertainty of terms:
‘A contract the term of which the court can not find with reasonable certainly.
VI. Revokable:
‘A contract which isin its nature revokable
‘VIL. Contract made by trustee in excess of their power:
Acontract made by trustees either in excess of their power or in breach of their trust.
‘VIIL. Contract by or behalf of a corporation or public company created for spe
purposes:
Acontract made by or on behalf of a corporation or public company created for special
Purposes, or by the promoters of such company, which is in excess of its powers.
IX, Contracts of performance of a contitnuous duty existing over a longer period than
three years:
contract, the performance af which involves the performance of a continuous duty extending
‘vera longer period than three years from its date.
X. Non-existence of material part of subject matter:
Acontract of which a material part of the subject matter, supposed by both parties to exist, has,
before it has been made, ceased to exist.
XI.Contract to refer to arbitration:
No contract to refer to arbitration shall be specifically enforced.7. Defences of defendant:
|. Meaning:
It means a denial by the defendant of the truth or validity of the plaintiffs claim, so itis denial of
plaintiff claim.
Il, Defences in suit of specific performance:
Following are the defences available the defedant.
Absence of writing or part performance:
The plaintiff has not performed the whole of his part of contract and that part left unperformed
forms a considerable portion of the whale which does not admit for compensation in money.
{ii) Compensation in money is adequate relief:
Defendant may set up a defence that compensation in money would be an adequate relief to the
plaintit.
Uncertain terms:
The terms of the contract cannot be fined with certainty. so want of certainty is 3 ground for
resisting specific of the contract
{iv) Absence of consideration:
Contract without consideration is @ good ground for defendant.
(v) Great hardshij
The performance of the contract would involve hardship on the defendant.
(vi) Defective title:
The plaintiff can not make good title to the property in accordance with the contract.
0
i) Misrepresentation:
The assent of the defendant was obtained under misrepresentation,
(
The assent of the defendant was given under mistake of fact.
i) Mistake of fact:The consideration paid by the plaintiffs grossly inadequate as to the amaunt to fraud or undue
advantage taken by the plaintif.
(x) Contract made by company in excess of its power
Contract made by the company in excess of its powers is defence for the defendant.
(xi) Unfair advantage to the plaintiff:
The contract when made gave the plaintiff an unfair advantage to the plaintiff.
(xii) Laps of time:
Suit for specific performance must be filed within three years if is filed after prescribed period it
will be a defence for defendant.
8, Conclusion:
To conclude | can say that, the specific performance of the contract is its actual execution. the
remedy of specific performance is discretionary remedy. the court will not allow the specific
performance when compensation in money isa sufficient remedy, under Sec. 21 of the specific
relief act contract same be specifically enforced. the defence against performance of the
contract.Specific relief by specific performance of contract
Introduction:
A contract is an agreement upon sufficient consideration to do or not to doa
particular act. The party on whom this contractual obligation rests must not fails
to discharge such obligation. In case of his failure, the other party will have a right
sue for performance of the contract. This is called ‘Specific Performance’. Orders
of specific performance are granted when damages are not an adequate remedy,
and in some specific cases such as land sale. Such orders are discretionary, as with
all equitable remedies, so the availability of this remedy will depend on whether it
is appropriate in the circumstances of the case. Under current law, courts grant
specific performance when they perceive that damages will be inadequate
compensation. Specific performance is deemed an extraordinary remedy,
awarded at the court's discretion.
Specific performance means enforcement of exact terms of the contract. Under it
the plaintiff claims for the specific thing of which he is entitled as per the terms of
the contract. For example, if A agrees to sell certain shares to B of a specific
company which are limited in number and after payment made by B, if A refuses
to sell the shares then Bis entitled to recovery of those shares.
Relevant provision:
Section 12 of the Special Relief Act, 1877.
Definition of contract
Under contract act, 1872, section 2 (h):
‘An agreement enforceable by law is a contract.
Cases in which specific performance enforceable under section 12:
Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, the specific performance of any
contract may in the discretion of the Court be enforced-
(a) When the act agreed to be done isin the performance, wholly or partly, of
a trust;
(b) when there] exists no standard for ascertaining the actual damage caused
by non-performance of the act agreed to be done;Illustration:
A agrees to buy, and B agrees to sell, a picture by a dead painter and two
rare china vases. A may compel B specifically to perform this contract, for
there is no standard for ascertaining the actual damage which would be
caused by its non-performance.
(c) When the act agreed to be done is such that pecuniary compensation for
its non-performance would not afford adequate reli
Illustration:
A contracts to sell, and B contracts to buy, a certain number of railway-
shares of a particular description. A refuses to complete the sale. B may
compel A specifically to perform this agreement, for the shares are limited
in number and not always to be had in the market, and their possession
carries with it the status of a share-holder, which cannot otherwise be
procured.
(d) When it is probable that pecuniary compensation cannot be got for the
non-performance of the act agreed to be done.
Scope of section 12:
Under section 12 of the special relief act, 1877, the court has discretion to
grant specific performance. The court is not bound to grant specific
performance only because it is lawful. The court has to look into the matter
and take the decision while using its discretionary powers.
+ When there exist no standard for ascertaining actual damage:
+ Itis the situation in which the plaintiff is unable to determine the amount
of loss suffered by him. Where the damage caused by the breach of
contract is ascertainable then the remedy of specific performance is not
available to the plaintiff. For example, a person enters into a contract for
the purchase of a painting of dead painter which is only one in the market
and its value is unascertainable then he is entitled to the same.
+ When compensation of money is not adequate relief:
+ In following cases compensation of money would not provide adequate
relief:
1. Where the subject matter of the contract is an immovable property.
2. Where the subject matter of the contract is movable property and,
3. Such property or goods are not an ordinary article of commerce Le. which
could be sold or purchased in the market.4, The article is of special value or interest to the plaintiff.
5. The article is of such nature that is not easily available in the market.
6. The property or goods held by the defendant as an agent or trustee of the
plaintiff.
Case law:
In Case of Ram Karan v. Govind Lal, an agreement for sale of agricultural land
‘was made & buyer had paid full sale consideration to the seller, but the seller
refuses to execute sale deed as per the agreement. The buyer brought an action
for the specific performance of contract and it was held by the court that the
compensation of money would not afford adequate relief and seller was directed
to execute sale deed in favour of buyer.
Contracts which cannot be specifically enforced:
According to section 21:
(a) Where compensation in money is an adequate relief: Here the court
will not order specific performance of contract as it is expected that
the plaintiff will bank upon the normal remedy for breach of contract
i.e. remedy of compensation.
(b) Where a contract runs into minutes or numerous detail: These
contracts includes contract which depends upon the personal
qualification or the violation of the parties or is of such nature that
the court cannot enforce specific performance of its material terms.
In Robinson Davison, it was held by the court that the contract to
perform in concert depends upan the personal kill of defendant's
wife, and the contract cannot be specifically enforced due to her
illness. The other example is construction contract where the
detailed terms of contract are not explained.
(c) acontract the terms of which the Court cannot find with reasonable
certainty;
example:
A, the owner of a refreshment-room, contracts, with B to give him
accommodation there for the sale of his goods and to furnish him.
with the necessary appliances. A refuses to perform his contract. The
case is one for compensation and not for specific performance, theamount and nature of the accommodation and appliances being
undefined.
(d)a contract which is in its nature revocable.
Example
Aand B contract to become partners in a certain business, the
contract not specifying the duration of the proposed partnership.
This contract cannot be specifically performed, for, if it were so
performed, either A or B might at once dissolve the partnership
(e)) a contract made by trustees either in excess of their powers or in
breach of their trust;
Example
Aisa trustee of land with power to lease it for seven years. He enters
into a contract with B to grant a lease of the land for seven years,
with a covenant to renew the lease at the expiry of the term. This
contract cannot be specifically enforced.
(f) a contract made by or on behalf of a corporation or public company
created for special purposes, or by the promoters of such company,
which is in excess of its powers;
example:
A company existing for the sole purpose of making and warking a
railway contract for the purchase of a piece of land for the purpose
of erecting a cotton-mill thereon. This contract cannot be specifically
enforced
(g)a contract the performance of which involves the performance of a
continuous duty extending over a longer period than three years
from its date;
(h)a contract of which a material part of the subject- matter, supposed
by both parties to exist, has, before it has been made, ceased to.
exist.
Example:
A contracts ta pay an annuity to B for the lives of C and D. It turns out
that, at the date of the contract, C, though supposed by A and B to be
alive, was dead. The contract cannot be specifically performed.+ Contract of arbitration: According to Section 14(2), a contract to refer
present or future differences to arbitration shall not be specifically
enforceable.