1

2
 Assignment on the Writ of Certiorari

Outline

1. Introduction

● Definition and Meaning of Writs

● Constitutional Provision for Writs

● Importance of the Writ of Certiorari

● Purpose and Objectives

2. Meaning and Definition of Certiorari

● Origin of the Term

● Legal Definition

● Explanation in the Context of Indian Law

● How it Differs from Other Writs

3. Historical Background

● Evolution in English Law

● Introduction in India during British Rule

3
 ● Post-Independence Development in India

● Expansion through Judicial Interpretation

4. Essential Conditions for the Writ of Certiorari

● Presence of Judicial or Quasi-Judicial Authority

● Exceeding of Jurisdiction

● Violation of Natural Justice

● Error of Law Apparent on the Face of the Record

5. Scope and Purpose of Certiorari

● Role in Judicial Review

● Protection Against Abuse of Power

● Ensuring Compliance with the Rule of Law

● Safeguarding Fundamental and Legal Rights

6. Distinction Between Certiorari and Other Writs

● Certiorari vs Habeas Corpus

● Certiorari vs Mandamus

● Certiorari vs Prohibition

● Certiorari vs Quo Warranto

7. Judicial Review and Certiorari

● Judicial Review Under Articles 32 and 226

● Certiorari as a Corrective Remedy

4
 ● Courts’ Role in Preventing Arbitrary Decisions

● Limits and Restrictions on Issuance

8. Case Laws on Certiorari

● R v. Electricity Commissioners (1924)

● Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque (1955)

● Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC (1959)

● A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969)

● Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan (1964)

● T.C. Basappa v. T. Nagappa (1955)

● State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh (1958)

● Union of India v. K.K. Dhawan (1993)

● Additional Case Laws and Their Significance

9. Challenges and Limitations of Certiorari

● Procedural Complexities

● Limited Scope of Review

● Requirement of Exhausting Other Remedies

● Possibility of Misuse

10. Conclusion

● Summary of Key Points

● Importance in Indian Legal Framework

5
 ● Future Implications

11. Bibliography

Writ of Certiorari

1. Introduction

Definition and Meaning of Writs

A writ is a formal written order issued by a court directing a person or authority to perform or
refrain from performing a particular act. Writs are an essential part of judicial power and
serve as a remedy to enforce legal rights. The power to issue writs is primarily vested in
superior courts to ensure justice and prevent the abuse of power by authorities.

The five types of writs under the Indian Constitution are:

1. Habeas Corpus – Protection against unlawful detention.

2. Mandamus – Commanding an authority to perform a duty.

3. Prohibition – Stopping lower courts from exceeding their jurisdiction.

4. Certiorari – Reviewing decisions of lower courts or tribunals.

5. Quo Warranto – Challenging the legality of a public officeholder’s position.

Constitutional Provision for Writs

The power to issue writs is granted under Article 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High
Courts) of the Indian Constitution. Article 32 is considered the "heart and soul" of the
Constitution, as described by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, because it allows citizens to directly
approach the Supreme Court for the enforcement of their fundamental rights.

Importance of the Writ of Certiorari

Certiorari plays a crucial role in judicial review. It is used to correct errors of jurisdiction or
law committed by lower courts or tribunals. It ensures that decisions made by these bodies
comply with legal standards and do not violate the principles of natural justice.

Purpose and Objectives

6
To keep inferior courts and tribunals within their legal authority.

To prevent arbitrary decisions.

To uphold the rule of law and ensure justice.

To correct errors that are evident on the face of the record.

2. Meaning and Definition of Certiorari

Origin of the Term

The term certiorari is derived from Latin, meaning "to be certified" or "to be informed." It
originated in English common law, where the King's courts used it to review decisions of
inferior courts.

Legal Definition

Certiorari is a judicial writ issued by a superior court to an inferior court or tribunal, directing
it to transmit the records of a case for review to ensure the legality and correctness of the
decision.

Explanation in the Context of Indian Law

In India, the writ of certiorari is used primarily for judicial review to ensure that lower courts,
tribunals, or administrative authorities do not exceed their jurisdiction or commit errors of
law. It is issued when:

1. The authority has acted without jurisdiction.

2. There is a violation of natural justice.

3. There is an apparent error of law.

How it Differs from Other Writs

Unlike Mandamus, which commands an authority to act, Certiorari quashes an illegal or

improper decision. It also differs from Prohibition, which prevents an act, while Certiorari
corrects an act already performed.

3. Historical Background

7
Evolution in English Law

The writ of certiorari was initially developed in England as a royal prerogative to control
inferior courts. It was issued by the King’s Bench to review the proceedings of lower courts.

Introduction in India During British Rule

During British rule, the writ of certiorari was introduced in India through the Charter Act of
1774, which established the Supreme Court of Calcutta. Over time, it became a significant
tool for judicial control over administrative decisions.

Post-Independence Development in India

After independence, the power to issue writs was incorporated into the Indian Constitution
under Articles 32 and 226, expanding its application.

Expansion Through Judicial Interpretation

Indian courts have broadened the scope of Certiorari to include administrative actions and
quasi-judicial bodies, ensuring greater accountability.

4. Essential Conditions for the Writ of Certiorari

The writ of Certiorari is issued by a superior court to an inferior court, tribunal, or quasi-
judicial body when certain conditions are met. These conditions ensure that the lower
authority has committed a legal error that requires correction. The essential conditions for the
issuance of this writ are:

1. Presence of a Judicial or Quasi-Judicial Authority

Certiorari is issued only when the authority in question performs judicial or quasi-judicial
functions. A judicial body makes decisions based on legal principles, while a quasi-judicial
body has some judicial powers but does not function as a full court.

For example, tribunals such as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) or Consumer
Dispute Redressal Forums can be subjected to Certiorari. However, purely administrative or
executive bodies that do not decide disputes based on legal rights and obligations are
generally outside the scope of this writ.

2. Exceeding of Jurisdiction

The writ of Certiorari is issued when an inferior court or tribunal exceeds its jurisdiction or
acts beyond the powers granted to it by law. This occurs when:

8
A tribunal decides a matter it has no authority over.
A court assumes jurisdiction over a case that does not fall within its competence.

A decision is made without following proper legal procedures.

For example, if a labour court takes up a case that falls under the jurisdiction of a civil court,
the decision can be quashed using Certiorari.

3. Violation of Natural Justice

Natural justice is a fundamental principle ensuring fairness in legal proceedings. If a lower

court or tribunal violates these principles, its decision can be reviewed through Certiorari.
The two key principles of natural justice are:

1. Nemo judex in causa sua – No one should be a judge in their own case (rule against bias).

2. Audi alteram partem – Both parties must be given a fair hearing.

If a judge has a personal interest in a case, or if a party is denied a chance to present their
case, Certiorari can be issued to quash the decision.

4. Error of Law Apparent on the Face of the Record

A writ of Certiorari is issued when there is an error of law so obvious that it does not require
a detailed examination of evidence. Such an error must be self-evident from the judgment
itself.

For example, if a tribunal applies a law incorrectly or misinterprets a statute, Certiorari can be
issued. However, factual errors or mistakes in reasoning that do not involve a clear legal
mistake are generally not grounds for this writ.

5. Scope and Purpose of Certiorari

The writ of Certiorari is a crucial legal remedy that ensures justice by allowing superior
courts to review and correct errors in decisions made by inferior courts or tribunals. Its scope
and purpose can be understood through the following points:

1. Role in Judicial Review

Certiorari is a fundamental tool for judicial review, ensuring that courts and tribunals act
within their legal authority. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court and High Courts to
oversee the actions of lower courts and tribunals, maintaining the integrity of the legal
system.

9
For example, in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that even
administrative actions that affect rights can be reviewed under Certiorari if they involve
elements of judicial decision-making.

2. Protection Against Abuse of Power

Certiorari ensures that public authorities and tribunals do not misuse their powers. If a lower
court or tribunal makes an unjust decision by acting beyond its jurisdiction or in violation of
the law, the writ can be used to annul such decisions.

In Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan (1964), the Supreme Court held that Certiorari can be
issued if a tribunal makes a decision based on irrelevant factors or ignores important legal
provisions.

3. Ensuring Compliance with the Rule of Law

The writ of Certiorari upholds the rule of law by ensuring that courts and tribunals adhere to
legal principles while making decisions. If a judicial or quasi-judicial body misinterprets a
law or fails to follow proper procedures, its decision can be set aside.

4. Safeguarding Fundamental and Legal Rights

One of the most important purposes of Certiorari is to protect individuals from unfair legal
decisions. By ensuring that tribunals and lower courts follow proper legal procedures,
Certiorari acts as a safeguard for fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

For instance, if a person is denied a fair hearing by a tribunal, they can approach the High
Court or Supreme Court for relief through Certiorari.

6.Distinction Between Certiorari and Other Writs

The writ of Certiorari is one of the five writs available under the Indian Constitution for
judicial review. While all writs serve the purpose of protecting legal and fundamental rights,
Certiorari has specific functions that distinguish it from the others.

1. Certiorari vs. Habeas Corpus

Habeas Corpus is issued to release a person from unlawful detention.

Certiorari is issued to quash illegal judicial or quasi-judicial decisions.

Example: If a person is wrongly arrested, Habeas Corpus is used; if a court wrongly convicts
a person due to jurisdictional error, Certiorari applies.

10
2. Certiorari vs. Mandamus

Mandamus compels a public authority to perform a legal duty it has failed to do.

Certiorari quashes decisions made beyond jurisdiction.

Example: If a government officer refuses to grant a license despite eligibility, Mandamus can
be issued. If a tribunal passes an order outside its legal power, Certiorari is used.

3. Certiorari vs. Prohibition

Prohibition prevents an inferior court from exceeding its jurisdiction before making a
decision.

Certiorari is issued after the decision is made.

Example: If a tribunal is about to hear a case it has no authority over, Prohibition is issued. If
the tribunal has already ruled, Certiorari is issued to quash it.

4. Certiorari vs. Quo Warranto

Quo Warranto questions the legal right of a person to hold a public office.

Certiorari corrects judicial errors.

Example: If an unqualified person holds a government position, Quo Warranto applies; if a

tribunal wrongly disqualifies an elected official, Certiorari is used.

Each writ serves a distinct purpose, ensuring justice and preventing misuse of power.

7. Judicial Review and Certiorari

1. Judicial Review Under Articles 32 and 226

Article 32 – Empowers the Supreme Court to issue Certiorari to enforce fundamental rights.

Article 226 – Grants High Courts the power to issue Certiorari even for legal rights beyond
fundamental rights.

11
2. Certiorari as a Corrective Remedy

It is used to correct errors made by lower courts, especially when decisions are made beyond
jurisdiction or against natural justice.

3. Courts’ Role in Preventing Arbitrary Decisions

Superior courts act as guardians of law, preventing lower courts and tribunals from making
arbitrary or illegal decisions.

4. Limits and Restrictions on Issuance

Cannot be issued against purely administrative or legislative actions.

Cannot be used to challenge private contractual matters.

8. Case Laws on Certiorari

1. R v. Electricity Commissioners (1924) – Established Certiorari for judicial review of

administrative actions.

2. Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque (1955) – Laid down the principles for applying
Certiorari in India.

3. Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC (1959) – Held that lack of fair hearing violates
natural justice.

4. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) – Extended Certiorari to administrative decisions

involving judicial functions.

5. Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan (1964) – Explained the limitations of Certiorari in

reviewing factual errors.

6. T.C. Basappa v. T. Nagappa (1955) – Recognized Certiorari for correcting legal errors.

7. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh (1958) – Held that Certiorari can be issued
even when alternative remedies exist.

12
8. Union of India v. K.K. Dhawan (1993) – Stressed accountability in public service matters.

These cases illustrate how Certiorari functions as a key tool for judicial intervention.

9. Challenges and limitations of the certiorari

While the writ of Certiorari is an essential tool for judicial review, it is subject to several
challenges and limitations that affect its applicability and effectiveness. These limitations
arise due to procedural requirements, jurisdictional restrictions, and practical constraints in its
implementation.

1. Procedural Complexities

The process of filing for Certiorari involves strict procedural requirements and detailed
documentation, making it complex for an ordinary citizen to approach the court.

A petitioner must prove that a lower court or tribunal acted beyond its jurisdiction, which
often requires extensive legal arguments and case law references.

The burden of proof lies on the petitioner, making it difficult to succeed unless there is a clear
and evident error of law.

2. Limited Scope of Review

Certiorari is issued only in cases involving judicial or quasi-judicial functions. It cannot be

issued against purely administrative or executive actions unless they have a judicial nature.

Courts do not review errors of fact unless they lead to an error of law. This means wrong
factual findings by lower courts cannot be corrected through Certiorari unless they result in a
clear legal mistake.
In Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan (1964), the Supreme Court held that Certiorari cannot be
used to re-evaluate evidence or reconsider facts unless there is a manifest error of law.

3. Requirement of Exhausting Other Remedies

Courts typically do not issue Certiorari if alternative remedies (such as appeals or reviews)
are available.

13
Petitioners must first exhaust all legal remedies, including appeals within the same judicial
system, before approaching a High Court or Supreme Court.

However, in exceptional cases where natural justice is violated or the authority has acted
without jurisdiction, courts may bypass this requirement.

4. Possibility of Misuse

The writ of Certiorari can be misused by litigants seeking to delay legal proceedings. Parties
may file a petition to stall the execution of lower court judgments.

In some cases, it has been observed that powerful individuals and corporations misuse
Certiorari to challenge decisions unfavorable to them, thereby prolonging legal disputes.

5. Jurisdictional Restrictions

Certiorari can only be issued by constitutional courts (Supreme Court under Article 32 and
High Courts under Article 226). Lower courts and tribunals do not have the power to issue
this writ.

The jurisdiction of High Courts is limited to their territorial boundaries, meaning that
Certiorari cannot be issued against decisions made outside their geographical jurisdiction
unless the cause of action arises within that state.

10.Conclusion

The writ of Certiorari is a fundamental instrument in judicial review, ensuring that lower
courts, tribunals, and quasi-judicial authorities act within their legal jurisdiction. It plays a
crucial role in correcting errors of law, preventing the abuse of power, and upholding the
principles of natural justice and rule of law.
Through various judicial interpretations, Indian courts have expanded the scope of Certiorari
to not only quash decisions made beyond jurisdiction but also rectify decisions that violate
fundamental rights. Landmark cases such as Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque (1955)
and Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC (1959) highlight its significance in maintaining
judicial accountability.

However, Certiorari is subject to limitations, such as procedural complexities, the

requirement to exhaust alternative remedies, and its inapplicability to purely administrative or
private matters. Additionally, courts must exercise caution to prevent its misuse, ensuring that
it does not become a tool for unnecessary litigation and delays.

14
Despite these challenges, Certiorari remains an essential mechanism for judicial intervention,
safeguarding individuals from arbitrary decisions and ensuring compliance with the
Constitution and statutory laws. As India’s legal system evolves, the application of this writ
will continue to adapt, reinforcing judicial oversight and constitutional governance.

11.Bibliography

1. Books

Basu, D.D. Introduction to the Constitution of India. LexisNexis, 2021.

Jain, M.P. Indian Constitutional Law. LexisNexis, 2022.

H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India. Universal Law Publishing, 2019.

V.G. Ramachandran, Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Remedies. Eastern Book

Company, 2006.

2. Articles and Journals

Upadhyay, R. "Judicial Review and the Writ of Certiorari in India." Indian Journal of
Constitutional Law, vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, pp. 145-167.

Khanna, H.R. "Scope and Limitations of Writ Jurisdiction." Journal of the Indian Law
Institute, vol. 12, no. 3, 2018, pp. 92-108.

Rao, K. "Certiorari and Natural Justice: An Analytical Study." All India Reporter, 2020.

3. Case Laws

R v. Electricity Commissioners, [1924] 1 KB 171.

Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque, AIR 1955 SC 233.

Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC, AIR 1959 SC 308.

A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India, AIR 1969 SC 150.

Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan, AIR 1964 SC 477.

T.C. Basappa v. T. Nagappa, AIR 1955 SC 440.

15
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86.

Union of India v. K.K. Dhawan, (1993) 2 SCC 56.

4. Constitutional and Statutory References

The Constitution of India, Articles 32 and 226.

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

5. Online Resources

Supreme Court of India Official Website: www.sci.gov.in

High Court Websites (Judicial Review and Writ Jurisdiction)

Indian Kanoon: www.indiankanoon.org

16