Scribd
Upload
26 views2 pages

Scoring Cambridge Writings

The document outlines a scoring rubric for evaluating essays based on four criteria: Content, Communicative Achievement, Language, and Organization. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with descriptions provided for each score indicating the level of quality and effectiveness. The rubric aims to provide a clear framework for assessing the relevance, clarity, and structure of written work.

Uploaded by

raquelglass
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
26 views2 pages

Scoring Cambridge Writings

The document outlines a scoring rubric for evaluating essays based on four criteria: Content, Communicative Achievement, Language, and Organization. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with descriptions provided for each score indicating the level of quality and effectiveness. The rubric aims to provide a clear framework for assessing the relevance, clarity, and structure of written work.

Uploaded by

raquelglass
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SCORING CAMBRIDGE WRITINGS

Scoring Rubric

1. Content

 1: The essay is off-topic or lacks relevant content. The main idea is unclear or missing.

 2: The essay addresses the topic but with limited development and relevance. The main idea is
somewhat clear but underdeveloped.

 3: The essay is generally relevant with a clear main idea and some development. There may be
minor issues with depth or relevance.

 4: The essay is well-developed, relevant, and presents a clear main idea. The content is detailed
and mostly insightful.

 5: The essay is highly relevant with a thoroughly developed main idea. The content is detailed,
insightful, and offers original perspectives.

2. Communicative Achievement

 1: The essay fails to achieve its purpose. The message is unclear or poorly conveyed.

 2: The essay somewhat achieves its purpose but with significant gaps in clarity or effectiveness.
The message is only partially conveyed.

 3: The essay generally achieves its purpose with clear communication. The message is mostly
conveyed effectively.

 4: The essay effectively achieves its purpose with clear and engaging communication. The
message is well-conveyed and impactful.

 5: The essay excellently achieves its purpose with highly effective and engaging communication.
The message is conveyed clearly and persuasively.

3. Language

 1: The language is unclear and contains frequent errors. Vocabulary and grammar are
consistently problematic.

 2: The language is somewhat clear but contains numerous errors. Vocabulary and grammar
issues affect readability.

 3: The language is generally clear with occasional errors. Vocabulary and grammar are mostly
appropriate.
 4: The language is clear, precise, and with few errors. Vocabulary and grammar are effective and
appropriate.

 5: The language is exceptionally clear, precise, and engaging with no errors. Vocabulary and
grammar are sophisticated and highly effective.

4. Organization

 1: The essay lacks clear organization. There is no logical flow or structure.

 2: The essay has some organization but is poorly structured. The logical flow is inconsistent.

 3: The essay is generally well-organized with a clear structure. Some transitions or connections
may be weak.

 4: The essay is well-organized with a clear structure and effective transitions. The logical flow is
smooth and coherent.

 5: The essay is excellently organized with a highly effective structure and seamless transitions.
The logical flow is exceptionally smooth and coherent.

You might also like