GGGGGGGGGGGGGG
GGGGGGGGGGGGGG
                                 a
                                   School of Energy and Environmental Studies, DAVV, Indore (M.P.) 452017, India
                    b
                        Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi 110016, India
                            Received 10 March 2003; received in revised form 22 March 2003; accepted 26 March 2003
Abstract
   A comparative study was conducted between exotic and local (epigeic-Eisenia fetida and anaecic-Lempito mauritii, respectively)
species of earthworms for the evaluation of their efficacy in vermicomposting of municipal solid waste (MSW). Vermicomposting of
MSW for 42 days resulted in significant difference between the two species in their performance measured as loss in total organic
carbon, carbon–nitrogen ratio (C:N) and increase in total Kjeldahl nitrogen, electrical conductivity and total potassium and weight
loss of MSW. The change in pH and increase in number of earthworms and cocoons and weight of earthworms were non-signi-
ficant.
Ó 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0960-8524/$ - see front matter Ó 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00123-8
170                                 Kaviraj, S. Sharma / Bioresource Technology 90 (2003) 169–173
C:N
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  4.92
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  8.23
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  –
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 process and increased K2 O over the control.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    All the treatments showed a similar pattern of
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 change in EC, which increased from the initial value of
TKN
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  11.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 1.60–1.86 ms/cm in the case of E. fetida, 1.73 in
9.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  –
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 L. mauritii and 1.64 ms/cm in control after the whole
Chemical analysis of compost produced with different treatments for TOC, TKN and C:N ratio (Panel A), ANOVA of days and treatments for TOC and TKN (Panel B)
                                                                                                                                                                                               F -value
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 period of decomposition. A gradual increase in EC
TOC
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  4.49
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  7.44
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 was observed with increase in decomposition time.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  –
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 These results are corroborated by Wong et al. (1997).
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 The increase in EC might have been due to the loss of
                                                                                                                                                                              56.7  0.02
                                                                                                                                                                              56.7  0.06
                                                                                                                                                                              56.7  0.09
                                                                                                                                                                              56.4  0.13
                                                                                                                                                                              56.4  0.12
                                                                                                                                                                              54.3  0.11
                                                                                                                                                                              54.0  0.16
C:N
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  38.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  187
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  313
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 potassium).
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    The results related to the weight loss and pH are
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 depicted in Table 3. There was a decrease in total bulk
                                                                                                                                                                              0.31  0.10
                                                                                                                                                                              0.31  0.05
                                                                                                                                                                              0.31  0.06
                                                                                                                                                                              0.31  0.08
                                                                                                                                                                              0.31  0.12
                                                                                                                                                                              0.32  0.13
                                                                                                                                                                              0.32  0.10
TKN
TOC
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  11.6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  19.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  2.58
                                                                                                                                                                                               MS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 phate.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Interesting results were obtained pertaining to the
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 growth of earthworms. Although the doubling rate in
                                                                                                                                                                              56.7  0.11
                                                                                                                                                                              56.1  0.13
                                                                                                                                                                              52.6  0.16
                                                                                                                                                                              47.2  0.09
                                                                                                                                                                              41.0  0.12
                                                                                                                                                                              33.7  0.15
                                                                                                                                                                              28.1  0.03
C:N
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  12
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2
TKN
                                                                                                                                                                                                          TOC
                                                                                                                                                                                               DF
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  12
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 4. Conclusion
                                                                                                                                                                              56.7  0.05
                                                                                                                                                                              54.0  0.08
                                                                                                                                                                              51.2  0.12
                                                                                                                                                                              46.0  0.14
                                                                                                                                                                              40.0  0.11
                                                                                                                                                                              32.5  0.09
                                                                                                                                                                              25.1  0.12
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  1123
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   625
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   457
                                                                                                                                                                        C:N
C:N
TKN
TOC
Panel B
Days
Days
Table 2
Chemical analysis of compost produced with different treatments for EC and TK (Panel A), ANOVA of days and species for TK and EC (Panel B)
  Days               Exotic                                  Local                                     Control
                     EC                 TK                   EC                    TK                  EC                   TK
  Panel A
  0                  1.60  0.05        0.20  0.02          1.60  0.06           0.20  0.09         1.60  0.03          0.20  0.01
  7                  1.60  0.06        0.20  0.03          1.60  0.08           0.20  0.02         1.60  0.02          0.20  0.05
  14                 1.61  0.08        0.20  0.01          1.61  0.07           0.20  0.03         1.60  0.01          0.20  0.03
  21                 1.61  0.03        0.20  0.09          1.61  0.02           0.21  0.01         1.62  0.08          0.20  0.04
  28                 1.72  0.09        0.21  0.05          1.67  0.03           0.21  0.05         1.62  0.02          0.20  0.03
  35                 1.79  0.07        0.22  0.03          1.72  0.01           0.21  0.06         1.64  0.03          0.20  0.02
  42                 1.86  0.02        0.22  0.02          1.73  0.01           0.21  0.02         1.64  0.05          0.20  0.01
                     SS                                      DF                                        MSS                                          F -value
                     TK                 EC                   TK                    EC                  TK                   EC                      TK          EC
  Panel B
  Days               0.0004             0.0157                6                     6                  0.00006              0.0026                  3.0         8.72
  Treatments         0.0003             0.0625                2                     2                  0.00015              0.0312                  7.5         17.33
  Residual           0.0003             0.0227               12                    12                  0.00002              0.0018                  –           –
All values are the mean of three replicates; all values of K are given in the percentage and EC in ms/cm.
Table 3
Chemical analysis of compost produced with different treatments for weight loss and pH (Panel A), ANOVA of days and treatments for weight loss
and pH (Panel B)
  Days             Exotic                               Local                                      Control
                   Wt. loss          pH                 Wt. loss              pH                   Wt. loss          pH
  Panel A
  0                   0  0.00       8.9  0.09          0  0.00             8.9  0.09           0  0.00          8.9  0.02
  7                 3.3  0.01       8.4  0.12          3.3  0.09           8.4  0.12           2.3  0.08        8.4  0.03
  14                6.6  0.02       7.4  0.12          5.5  0.08           7.0  0.13           3.6  0.06        7.2  0.01
  21                9.4  0.03       6.9  0.11          5.5  0.06           7.0  0.09           3.6  0.02        7.2  0.01
  28               13.5  0.02       7.1  0.09         16.8  0.02           7.2  0.08           8.0  0.06        6.7  0.02
  35               20.0  0.12       6.9  0.01         16.8  0.16           7.2  0.09           8.0  0.02        6.7  0.06
  42               39.3  0.12       6.9  0.02         30.71  0.10          7.1  0.02           9.4  0.03        6.7  0.03
                   SS                                   DF                                         MSS                                   F -value
                   Wt. loss          pH                 Wt. loss              pH                   Wt. loss          pH                  Wt. loss               pH
  Panel B
  Days             1422.3            5.10                6                     6                   237               8.50                8.34                   0.25
  Treatments        257.8            5.85                2                     2                   128.9             2.92                4.53                   0.86
  Residual          341.8            40.39              12                    12                   28.4              3.36                –                      –
All values are the mean of three replicates; the value of weight loss is given in percentage.
Table 4
Change in growth rate, number of earthworms and cocoons and weight of earthworms
  Days             Exotic                                                                  Local
                   NW              GR                 NC               Wt.                 NW                   GR                NC                      Wt.
  0                20.0              0.0              0.00              4.0                20.0                 0.0               0.00                  6.0
  7                20.0              0.0              0.10              4.1                20.0                 0.0               0.05                  6.2
  14               20.0              2.0              0.26              4.2                21.0                 3.0               0.13                  6.2
  21               21.0              4.5              0.80              4.4                22.0                 6.5               0.75                  6.6
  28               22.0              8.5              1.60              5.2                22.0                 7.5               1.60                  7.6
  35               37.0             85.5              9.60             11.6                29.0                46.5               6.60                 13.6
  42               51.0            156.5              14.0             12.0                46.0               130.0               8.60                 18.6
NW––mean number of earthworms; GR––growth rate of earthworms (number) in percentage; NC––mean number of cocoons; Wt.––mean weight of
earthworms (gm); t-calculated: earthwormsÕ number ¼ 0.20, earthwormsÕ weight ¼ 0.96.
                                          Kaviraj, S. Sharma / Bioresource Technology 90 (2003) 169–173                                         173