INDUCTION MODULE(23084)

R1701D215886

CONSTANCE TEYE

ARGUMENTATIVE EASSY

EVANGELIA PAPAMIKROULEA

9th MARCH 2021

Online learning does it have positive effect on it Result?

Article case-study as procedure to test analyzing statistics corresponding to student and
tutor regulation of concurrent consultation panel connected broadcast symposium,
meanwhile early quarter related degree program in applied psychology at the city University
of Hong Kong.It determine every bit task links the symposium panel use to determine
student produce online atmosphere ,except if impel suitable and proper channel the program
is laid out.Additional place thrice different phase network interrelations and ideals in a way
meditated by judgement. Education utilizing the web as an automobile for satisfied
broadcast, tutor-student interrelationship has multiple has occupy debates that links to, online
learning (Nash 2004). Greatly of educational study in this section has fore ground on
looking the essential of teacher- student and student-student interrelations in online learning
operations, especially use of symposium/journal panel to sustain the making of a useful
learning surroundings(Downing &Chim,2004). Mostly little studies go through week-on-
week statistics of tutor and student journal panel movement within a section.

A little uncertainty that vastly increase application of cyber space and database training
persist to current instructors,with reasonable chances and problems. Within the many
allocated problems is centered on lack of interrelation in network education environments
Hron,&Friedrich,(2003)),filled by the belief that our normal study hall for
example,Rebertson and Klotz(2002) online study gives freedom to student how to study on it
Knowing the important diverse among concurrent and a compatibility consultation,Boaz et
al.(1999) pertain increasing of network chat proofing possible cost of concurrent network
consultation movement.Its process consist of student who are active in learning at a certain
period,the problem with approach it does not give time for student to reflect and recheck
what they want to put across.Likewise asynchronous discussion board Implies that gives
chances to student for less stress learning atmosphere which participation to online study will
suit to student time constraint to face-to-face atmosphere is limited (Downing &Chin,2003).

As stated in the Garrison, & Anderson; (2003) identify thrice‘character in grandeur education
setting of network consultation panel.This analysis is base on learner-tutor ,learner-learner
maintaining an online learning community. This article is aim at ‘blended learning ,which is
used to portray that blend numerous events base on movements as well as in person
classroom, network learning and person-placed . Black board, enroll administration method
in measured blending learning.Mix of personal study, instructor directed occasion and batch
partnership it base on concurrent methods bring goods result .Valiathan(2002).e blending
learning case is an approach describes learning that mixed various base movements, as well
as personal study hall, network learning and person pace learning.The prime device to reach
network element of the blended learning program was the enroll
administration,chalkboard.Blended learning finds the mix of personal study, instructor
directed occasion and batch partnership,one of them bring a blend to fixed time, and
anytime,anywhere learning. Valiathan(2002).

The procedure has its duration of 17weeks,one before the start of the study Period then
3weeks beyond the 13weeks for program period ,which the setting outfit and all
Learner to teacher interrelation for touching and cordial motivation. It's group involve every
release which is direct in finding and giving confidence and help with cordial or touching
query and matters connected to learning the program.
judgement ,task to the entire program(10 units) are provided from the day one of the section
that student learn at their own style that suit to them.To get data this categories are used.

Student-to-student interrelations for instrumental reason it involves all posting primarily

relate to searching and assisting , literary query connected to program outfit and element or
enquries , tasks and the format program.

The 17weeks after result is acquired.Brown(2001) identifies the second stage of one
community conferment or acceptance,occuring when students are part of along,
thoughtful,thread discussion on subject importance.

Although with it problem, making interrelations network studying makes important theoretical
insight. It effect cordial and touching query and matters connecting to learning of the program.
The third query come to mind what tasks involve when maintaining network interrelations,
and this is a question that needs some statistics. They advocate that network consultation
movement will different levels, on grounds will not be like study hall. Likewise there is a
socially active phase, an instrumental phase and then a gradual, and perhaps natural, method
of disagreement. Modern research implies that learners take realistic method , clear when are
done with everything about the program.Usefulness of network interrelation is not achieve
due to the Period of the program.If learners involve pensive network consultation movement
firstly,also finish network program outfit, is likely reverse fruitfulness in maintaining
activeness over the conclusion of the program.
Bandura, A. (1965) Influence of model’s reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of
imitative responses, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589–595.
Biggs, J. (1999) Teaching for quality learning in university (London, Society for Research
into Higher
Boaz, M., Elliott, B., Foshee, D., Hardy, D., Jarmon, C. & Olcott, D. (1999) Teaching at a
distance: a handbook for instructors (Mission Viejo, CA, League for Innovation in the
Community College).
Boettcher, J. (1999) Another look at the tower of WWWebble, Syllabus Magazine, 13(3), 50–
52. Bourne, J. R., McMaster, E., Reiger, J. & Campbell, J. O. (1997) Paradigms for on-line
learning: a case study in the design and implementation of an asynchronous learning
networks (ALN) course, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1(2), 38–56.
Brown, R. E. (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes, Journal
of
Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18–35.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a
theoretically based approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.
Chou, C. C. (2001) Formative evaluation of synchronous CMC systems for a learner-
centered online course, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(2/3), 170–188.
Cook, K. (2000) Computer conferencing really makes the Web interactive, in: E. J. Leach
(Ed.) A collection of practices from the league’s conference on information technology
(Mission Viejo, CA, League for Innovation in the Community College), 132.
De Laat, M. & Lally, V. (2004) It’s not so easy: researching the complexity of emergent
participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions, Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 165–171.
Downing, K. (2001) Information technology, education, and health care: constructivism in
the 21st century, Educational Studies, 2(3), 229–235.
Downing, K. J. & Chim, T. M. (2003) Learning style, student satisfaction and blended
learning,
paper presented at the Fourteenth International Conference on College Teaching and
Learning, Florida Community, Jacksonville, FL, 14–18 April.
Downing, K. J. & Chim, T. M. (2004a) What are the characteristics of effective online
students?, paper presented at the Fifteenth International Conference on College Teaching
and Learning,
Jacksonville, FL, 29 March–2 April.
Downing, K. J. & Chim, T. M. (2004b) Reflectors as online extraverts, and Educational
Studies,(30(3),265-376.
214 K. J. Downing et al.
Downing, K. J. & Shin, K. (2006) Developing metacognition with LASSI online, paper
presented at the International Conference of the Asia-Pacific Educational Research
Association, Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong, November.
Gandell, T., Weston, C., Finkelstein, A. & Weiner, L. (2000) Appropriate use of the web in
teaching higher education, in: B. L. Mann (Ed.) Perspectives in web course management
(Toronto, Canadian Scholar’s Press), 61–68.
Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003) E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for
research and
practice (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
Gilbert, P. K. & Dabbagh, N. (2005) How to structure online discussions for meaningful
discourse: a case study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5–18.
Grady, D. B. (2003) Mapping online discussions with lexical scores, Journal of Interactive
Learning,
14(2), 209–229.
Grundy, J. (2002) Flexible learning and the flexible worker. British Telecom White Paper,
December
(London, BT).
Henri, F. & Pudelko B. (2003) Understanding and analysing activity and learning in virtual
communities, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 474–487.
Hron, A. & Friedrich, H. F. (2003) A review of web-based collaborative learning: factors
beyond technology, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 70–79.
Hwang, W. Y. & Wang, C. Y. (2004) A study of learning time patterns in asynchronous
learning environments, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 292–304.
Kay, R. H. (2006) Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board
effectiveness, British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 761–783.
Lally, V. & Barrett, E. (1999) Building a learning community on-line: towards socio-
academic interaction, Research Papers in Education, 14(2), 147–163.
McGregor, D. (1967) The professional manager (New York, McGraw-Hill).
McNaught, C. & Lam, P. (2005) Building an evaluation culture and evidence base for e-
learning in three Hong Kong universities, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4),
599–614. Meyer, K. A. (2003) Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: the role of time and
higher order thinking, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.
Muirhead, B. (2001) Enhancing social interaction in computer-mediated distance education,
United States Distance Learning Association Ed at a Distance Magazine and Ed Journal,
15(40). Available online at: www.usdla.org/html/journal/APR01_Issue/article02.html
(accessed 3 April 2007).
Nash, S. S. (2004) New quality benchmarks for online courses: meshing technology and
conceptual underpinning, Selected papers from the Fifteenth International Conference on
College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL, 29 March–2 April (The Center for the
Advancement of Teaching and Learning, Florida Community College), 195–222.
Nicol, D. J., Minty, I. & Sinclair, C. (2003) The social dimensions of online learning,
Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 270–280.
Poole, D. M. (2000) Student participation in a discussion oriented online course: a case
study,
Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177.
Robertson, T. J. & Klotz, J. (2002) How can instructors and administrators fill the missing
link in online instruction, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4).
Available online at: http://www.westga.edu/∼dist ance/ojdl a/winter54 /roberson54.htm
(accessed 3 April 2007).
Salmon, G. (2000) eModerating: the key to teaching and learning online (London,
RoutledgeFalmer). Schallert, D. L., Reed, J. H. & D-Team, T. (2003) Intellectual,
motivational, textual, and cultural considerations in teaching and learning with computer-
mediated discussion, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 103–118.
Selwyn, N. (2000) Creating a ‘connected’ community? Teachers use of an electronic
discussion group, Teachers College Record, 102(4), 750–778.
Son, J. (2002) Online discussion in a CALL course for distance language teachers, CALICO
Journal,
20(1), 127–144.
Valiathan, P. (2002) Blended learning models. Available online at:
http://www.learningcircuits.org/ 2002/aug2002/valiathan.html (accessed 3 April 2007).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes
(Cambridge,
MA, Harvard University Press).
Wickstrom, C. D. (2003) A funny thing happened on the way to the forum, Journal of
Adolescent
and Adult Literacy, 46(5), 414–423.
Seabolt, B. & Arends, B. (2000) Remaining real in a virtual world. Available online at:
http://www. webct.com/service/viewcontentframe?
contentID=2385857&pageName=index.html (accessed 3 April(2007).

Yuselturk, E. & Top, E. (2006) Reconsidering online course discussions: a case study,
Journal of Education Technology system,24(3),341-367.