Digitisation of Society
Digitisation of Society
The digital age has revolutionized various aspects of society, including the justice system, and
India is no exception. E-courts, utilizing digital technology, have the potential to make legal
proceedings more efficient, accessible, and user-friendly. By overcoming geographical
barriers, e-courts enable individuals, regardless of their physical location, to participate in
legal processes remotely. This is particularly beneficial for individuals residing in rural or
remote areas in India. Digital literacy is emphasized as a crucial factor in effectively utilizing
e-court systems, requiring educational initiatives to ensure equal access to justice. The
research paper highlights the significance of robust technological infrastructure and policies
to protect privacy and confidentiality. Admissibility of electronic evidence and safeguarding
fundamental rights are discussed as legal and ethical challenges. Collaborative efforts among
policymakers, legal professionals, and technology experts are advocated for leveraging the
benefits of e-courts while upholding principles of justice in India's digital age.
Introduction
Ensuring access to justice is an essential element within any legal system, guaranteeing
individuals the opportunity to pursue and receive justice regardless of their socio-economic
status or personal characteristics. It is a fundamental principle that underpins equality, fairness,
and the very essence of the rule of law. 1
Access to justice can manifest itself through diverse means, such as the provision of legal aid,
the availability of low-cost or free legal services, and the effective functioning of the court
1
Galanter, Marc S. and Krishnan, Jayanth K, Bread for the Poor: Access to Justice and the Rights of the Needy in
India, 55 HASTINGS L.J. 789, (2004)
43
NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies
The international community has widely recognized the significance of ensuring access to
justice, evident in various international instruments such as the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights 2 and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 3. These documents serve
as testament to the value placed on granting individuals the opportunity to seek and obtain
justice on equal terms, irrespective of their personal circumstances.
Multiple barriers impede access to justice, encompassing financial limitations, limited legal
knowledge and literacy, geographical constraints, language and cultural complexities, and
biases and discrimination prevalent within the legal system. 6 Overcoming these obstacles is
crucial for establishing a fair and inclusive justice system.
As a response to the digital transformation of the judicial system, the concept of e-courts, also
known as digital courts or online courts, has gained prominence. E-courts facilitate the efficient
management and processing of cases, offering litigants an avenue for seeking justice through
2
The International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, art. 9(4).
3
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, art. 10.
4
Anita Kushwaha v Pushap Sudan, (2016) 8 S.C.C. 509 (India).
5
Access to Justice, UNITED NATIONS, https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/thematic-areas/justice-2/.
6
Hurter, E., Access to justice: to dream the impossible dream? 44.CILSA 408–427, (2011).
44
Vol VIII Issue II
electronic means. This technological development aims to enhance the organization of court
proceedings and provide accessible justice for all parties involved. 7
E-courts have emerged as an integral component of legal systems across numerous nations.
Particularly in economically disadvantaged countries facing challenges related to limited
judicial resources and infrastructure, e-courts have showcased their potential. Moreover, during
the COVID-19 pandemic, e-courts have played a vital role by providing a means to sustain
judicial proceedings while mitigating the risk of virus transmission.
Nevertheless, the implementation of e-courts presents several challenges. One of the primary
concerns revolves around safeguarding the security and privacy of court data, constituting a
significant issue. 8 Additionally, ensuring universal accessibility to the e-court system,
particularly for individuals without internet access or technological devices, poses another
obstacle that must be addressed.
1. United States: In the United States, E-Court initiatives vary from state to state, but they
often include electronic filing, e-signatures, and electronic payment options. The
federal court system also has an electronic case filing system, which allows attorneys
to file court documents electronically. 9
2. India: India’s E-Court initiative aims to provide efficient and transparent services to
litigants. The system allows for electronic filing, case management, and online access
to case information. The initiative has also introduced virtual court hearings and video
conferencing, which have helped to reduce delays caused by physical distance. 10
7
29 RICHARD SUSSKIND, THE END OF LAWYERS? RETHINKING THE NATURE OF LEGAL SERVICES
692-696 (2009).
8
KINHAL, D. and JAUHAR, A. VIRTUAL COURTS IN INDIA: A STRATEGY PAPER. VIDHI (2020).
9
Case Management / Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF), United States Courts, https://www.uscourts.gov/court-
records/electronic-filing-cmecf/faqs-case-management-electronic-case-files-cmecf (last visited on May 27,
2023).
10
E-Courts Mission Mode Project, E-Committee, Supreme Court of India,
https://ecommitteesci.gov.in/project/brief-overview-of-e-courts-project/ (last visited on April 25, 2023).
45
NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies
3. United Kingdom: In the United Kingdom, the E-Court initiative is focused on digitizing
court processes to make them more efficient. The initiative includes electronic filing,
electronic payment options, and an online system for tracking case progress. The UK
government has also introduced virtual hearings for some types of cases. 11
5. Canada: Canada’s E-Court initiative includes electronic filing, online access to case
information, and virtual court hearings. The initiative aims to improve access to justice,
particularly for those in remote areas, and to reduce delays caused by traditional court
processes. 13
E-Court initiatives hold immense potential to revolutionize the operations of judicial systems.
By leveraging technology and digital tools, e-courts can expedite legal procedures, enhance
access to justice, and reduce delays. As technological advancements continue to unfold, we can
anticipate further advancements in e-court initiatives worldwide.
E-courts, also referred to as electronic courts, utilize technology and digital instruments to
streamline court proceedings. While e-courts have the potential to improve the efficiency and
accessibility of the judicial system, it is crucial to acknowledge and address various obstacles
and criticisms that arise.
11
Ecourt the online justice system, http://www.ecourt.co.uk/faq.php (last visited on April 26, 2023).
12
MARTÍNEZ A AND FABRA ABAT PERE, E-JUSTICE: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
TECHNOLOGIES IN THE COURT SYSTEM (2008).
13
British Columbia,
https://justice.gov.bc.ca/cso/about/index.do;jsessionid=cio8vrXxHzCv59WxK4b3GWsZ.0e1ba411-53d7-3b0d-
8e0a-d5b7d8cafbab (last visited on May 26, 2023).
46
Vol VIII Issue II
2. Security Concerns: Security risks pose a significant challenge for e-courts as they
heavily rely on technology and electronic communication. Potential vulnerabilities and
hacking incidents could compromise the integrity of the legal system, putting
confidential data at risk.
3. Technical Challenges: Technical issues present another obstacle to the effective
operation of e-courts. Dependable and functional technology is essential for seamless
court processes. However, technical problems such as server outages, network issues,
and software glitches can impede or delay court proceedings, causing frustration and
inconvenience for all parties involved.
4. Privacy Concerns in E-Courts: The utilization of e-courts gives rise to concerns
regarding privacy due to the digital exchange and storage of personal information.
Moreover, there is a risk of unauthorized access to private data, which further
exacerbates these privacy issues.
5. Reduced Human Engagement in E-Courts: E-courts primarily rely on digital
communication. This lack of face-to-face engagement can negatively impact the
emotional well-being of participants and pose challenges for judges in assessing the
credibility of witnesses.
6. Digital Literacy Challenges in E-Courts: The requirement for digital literacy poses a
significant hurdle for individuals when navigating e-courts. Insufficient proficiency in
using technology can make it more difficult for people to effectively participate in the
legal system, exacerbating the marginalization experienced by already vulnerable
groups in society.
7. Cost Considerations in E-Courts: The establishment and maintenance of e-courts can
incur significant expenses, which may deter certain jurisdictions from adopting them
due to financial constraints.
Overall Assessment of E-Courts: While e-courts hold the potential to enhance the effectiveness
and accessibility of the legal system, their implementation should be approached cautiously,
taking into account the aforementioned challenges and criticisms.
Access to justice is a fundamental right, and it is crucial for the proper functioning of a
democratic society. Courts play a significant role in ensuring access to justice by resolving
47
NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies
disputes and providing legal remedies to aggrieved parties. With the advent of technology,
electronic courts (e-courts) have emerged as a new alternative to traditional courts.
Traditional Courts
For generations, seeking justice has predominantly involved resorting to court proceedings. In
the conventional court system, disputing parties present themselves before a judge who listens
to their arguments and delivers a verdict. In traditional courts, litigants are required to
physically attend court sessions and these courts are typically housed within a courthouse.
However, traditional courts are not always conveniently accessible. This poses a significant
barrier, especially for those who cannot afford the costs associated with traveling to court.
Additionally, traditional courts can be intimidating, particularly for individuals unfamiliar with
the legal system. Consequently, this may discourage individuals from asserting their legal
rights, leading to potential injustices.
E-Courts
One of the primary benefits of e-courts is their accessibility from any location with an internet
connection. This allows individuals residing in remote areas or those unable to physically
attend court to still avail themselves of legal services. Moreover, e-courts provide a less
intimidating environment compared to traditional courts, potentially motivating individuals to
actively pursue their legal rights.
The usability and accessibility of e-courts are significantly influenced by the legal framework
and policy environment in which they operate. The development of the legislative framework
for e-courts has been influenced by various factors, such as technological advancements,
political determination, and the need for justice system reforms. Many countries have embraced
14
Ecourtsservices, “ECourts”, https://services.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindia_v6/ (last visited on May 23, 2023).
15
Law Commission of India, Reform of Judicial Administration Report No.14, (September 1958).
48
Vol VIII Issue II
e-courts with the aim of improving access to justice, reducing case backlogs, and enhancing
the efficiency of the judicial system.
One crucial legal consideration in the establishment of e-courts is the protection of individual
rights and freedoms, particularly with regards to privacy and data security. E-courts must
adhere to national laws and regulations to ensure the safeguarding of data privacy and security.
Authenticity and admissibility of electronic evidence in court are important legal
considerations, requiring e-courts to establish policies and guidelines for its collection, storage,
and presentation. These measures ensure the reliability and credibility of electronic evidence.
Furthermore, the legal framework must guarantee that the utilization of electronic evidence
respects the rights of parties involved and upholds fair trial procedures.
Validity and admissibility of electronic evidence in court pose additional legal concerns that e-
courts must address. To ensure the credibility and acceptance of electronic evidence, e-court
systems need to establish regulations and protocols for its collection, storage, and presentation.
Moreover, it is essential for the legal framework to safeguard against unfair trial proceedings
and protect the rights of all parties involved.
E-Court Infrastructure: 16 To enable flawless court operations, the infrastructure for e-courts
consists of a complex network of hardware and software components. The following are crucial
components of the e-court infrastructure:
1. Court Management System (CMS): The CMS is a web-based system that oversees the
whole court process, from the registration of cases to the delivery of judgements. Since it
is a cohesive system, information may move between many departments and stakeholders
with ease.
2. Video Conferencing System (VCS): The VCS enables remote hearings, allowing judges,
attorneys, and other parties to participate from any location in the world. This is especially
16
Nyaya Bandhu, Pro Bono Legal Services, http://probono-doj.in/home/index (last visited on June 05, 2023).
49
NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies
helpful when it is impossible for someone to physically attend due to travel limitations or
health issues.
3. Document Management System (DMS): Using the DMS, court records may be digitally
preserved and shared by authorized individuals at any time, from any location. Physical
paperwork is no longer required, which saves time as well.
4. Electronic Display System (EDS): The EDS is a system that shows court proceedings
on electronic screens in the court complex, including case status, case lists, and cause lists.
This prevents the need for unnecessary physical travel inside the court complex and
guarantees that interested parties are kept informed about the proceedings in real-time.
5. The Court Recording and Transcription System (CRTS) records and transcribes court
proceedings so that they can be utilized as references or as evidence. As a result, there is
no longer a need for manual note-taking, and records are accurate and comprehensive.
E-court technology
The technology behind e-court is always developing to improve the speed, effectiveness, and
accessibility of the legal system. Among the important technologies employed in e-courts are:
3. Cloud Computing: To store and handle court papers and data, cloud computing is
employed in e-court. It offers a scalable and affordable data management and storage
solution that is accessible from any location in the world.
50
Vol VIII Issue II
The use of e-courts has transformed how justice is administered on a global scale. E-courts use
technology to improve the effectiveness, accessibility, and transparency of the judicial system.
The staff must be sufficiently trained and equipped with the essential abilities to manage the
technology and procedures involved for the e-court system to operate at its best. Capacity
building and training are crucial for a successful e-court adoption.
The provision of capacity building and training not only contributes to the efficacy and
efficiency of court procedures but also aids in reducing case backlogs and simplifying case
management for court personnel through appropriate training. Moreover, judges can make
more informed decisions by accessing case information.
Training also brings about increased accountability and transparency within the judicial system.
By educating judges, court employees, and other stakeholders in the utilization of technology,
information availability can be improved while mitigating the potential for corruption or
misconduct. Furthermore, by enabling online access to court hearings, the general public can
follow proceedings and hold the legal system accountable.
Resistance to change poses a significant barrier to the implementation of capacity building and
training in e-court. The adoption of e-court has brought about significant changes in court
operations, which may be met with reluctance from judges, attorneys, and court employees to
adapt to new procedures and tools. To address this challenge, it is crucial to involve all relevant
parties in the design and implementation stages of e-court systems, ensuring they are well-
informed about the benefits it offers.
17
E-Committee, Supreme Court of India, Draft Vision Document for e-Courts Project Phase III,
http://www.mit.gov.in/itbill.asp (last visited on June 2, 2023).
51
NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies
Additionally, the scarcity of resources presents another obstacle. Training and capacity building
require substantial financial and human resources. In many courts, particularly those in
developing nations, limited financial means may hinder the provision of comprehensive
training to their staff members.
It is of utmost importance to incorporate best practices for capacity building and training in e-
court to effectively tackle these challenges. These include:
For the successful implementation of e-court, capacity building and training play a pivotal role.
By ensuring that court employees, judges, and lawyers possess the necessary knowledge and
18
Law Commission of India, Need for Speedy Justice Report No.221 (April, 2009).
52
Vol VIII Issue II
skills to utilize e-court technologies, the judicial system can be enhanced in terms of
effectiveness, transparency, and accessibility. Addressing challenges such as resistance to
change and resource limitations requires the adoption of best practices, including conducting
comprehensive needs assessments, involving all stakeholders, offering incentives,
collaborating with training institutions, and providing continuous training. These measures are
crucial in establishing a robust foundation for e-court adoption.
Implementing access control is a crucial cyber security measure that should be employed by
E-courts. Access control involves restricting unauthorized individuals from accessing E-court
systems, networks, and databases. This can be achieved through encryption, multi-factor
authentication, and the use of strong passwords. Additionally, E-courts should have
mechanisms in place to monitor user privileges, ensuring that only authorized personnel can
access sensitive information. Network security plays a vital role in cyber security. E-courts
should have a secure network infrastructure equipped with firewalls, intrusion detection
systems, and anti-virus software. Regular security audits and penetration tests should be
conducted to identify and address any network vulnerabilities.
19
SEETHARAM, S AND CHANDRASHEKARAN, S, ECOURTS IN INDIA FROM POLICY FORMULATION
TO IMPLEMENTATION. VIDHI (2016).
20
Apoorva, Digitisation of courts brings privacy concerns. But India lacks right to be forgotten, THE PRINT,
November 22, 2021.
53
NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies
Encryption is a critical data protection technique that should be employed by E-courts. Through
encryption, data is transformed into a coded format, ensuring that only authorized personnel
can access and decipher it. This helps safeguard personal data from unauthorized access or theft
by cybercriminals. E-courts must adhere to data privacy regulations and laws to ensure
compliance. In many countries, organizations are required to obtain explicit consent from
individuals before collecting and utilizing their personal information. Therefore, e-courts
should obtain the explicit consent of litigants before collecting and processing any of their
personal data.
The implementation of e-courts necessitates careful consideration of cyber security and data
protection. Strong cyber security protocols should be established by e-courts to protect
sensitive data from hackers. Additionally, e-courts should develop data protection policies and
processes to safeguard personal information and ensure compliance with data protection
regulations. By implementing these measures, e-courts can provide a secure, efficient, and
reliable platform for the administration of justice.
E-courts, also known as electronic courts, are systems for managing and administering courts
that utilize information technology. These systems offer various advantages, such as expedited
case processing, reduced costs and waiting times, and improved accessibility to justice. 21
Singapore 22
Singapore took the lead in implementing an E-Court system through its Integrated Criminal
Case Filing and Management System (ICMS). This system enables lawyers and litigants to
electronically submit and access case materials, reducing the reliance on paper-based filings
and enhancing the efficiency of the court system.
21
The Pew Charitable Trusts, How Courts Embraced Technology, Met the Pandemic Challenge, and
Revolutionized Their Operations (December 1, 2021).
22
Singapore International Commercial Court, Electronic Filing Service, https://www.sicc.gov.sg/forms-and-
services/electronic-filing-service (last visited on April 23, 2023).
54
Vol VIII Issue II
Moreover, the ICMS incorporates video conferencing features, enabling witnesses and
solicitors to participate in court proceedings remotely, eliminating the need for physical
presence. Additionally, Singapore's e-Justice platform allows the public to access case
information and submit applications online, further enhancing accessibility and convenience.
United States 23
Extensive testing of E-Court systems has been underway in the United States, with notable
success seen in the Courtroom of the Future initiative in Michigan. This initiative has
introduced state-of-the-art courtroom equipment, including touchscreens, digital projectors,
and video conferencing capabilities. By adopting these advancements, the program has reduced
the reliance on paper-based filings and enhanced the efficiency of judicial proceedings.
Furthermore, Utah has implemented an online system for resolving disputes, allowing parties
to settle minor claims cases without the need for physical courtroom appearances. This
approach has resulted in a decrease in the number of trials and improved the effectiveness of
the dispute settlement process.
India 24
India has emerged as a leader in the implementation of E-Court systems, exemplified by the
introduction of the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG). This centralized database consolidates
case data from courts across the country, allowing litigants and solicitors to access case
information online and submit applications. The implementation of NJDG has resulted in faster
judicial processes, reducing the time and costs associated with obtaining case materials.
Additionally, India has implemented e-filing systems, enabling litigants and solicitors to
digitally submit court documents. This approach has significantly reduced the reliance on
paper-based filings and enhanced the efficiency of the court system.
Canada 25
23
MARTÍNEZ A AND FABRA ABAT PERE, E-JUSTICE: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
TECHNOLOGIES IN THE COURT SYSTEM (2008).
24
E-committee Supreme Court of India, “Policy and Action Plan Document Phase II of the ECourts Project”
https://sci.gov.in/pdf/ecommittee/PolicyActionPlanDocument-PhaseII-approved-08012014-indexed_Sign.pdf
(last visited on May 26, 2023).
25
British Columbia,
https://justice.gov.bc.ca/cso/about/index.do;jsessionid=cio8vrXxHzCv59WxK4b3GWsZ.0e1ba411-53d7-3b0d-
8e0a-d5b7d8cafbab (last visited on June 6, 2023).
55
NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies
The E-Court system has been implemented in the Canadian province of Ontario, allowing
parties to digitally submit and access case records. This system incorporates videoconferencing
features, enabling remote appearances by witnesses and lawyers, thereby reducing the need for
physical presence in court.
The E-Court system also incorporates online dispute resolution features, enabling parties to
resolve disputes without the need for physical courtroom appearances. This technology has
accelerated access to case information, reduced costs, and enhanced the efficiency of the legal
system.
The increasing popularity of e-court systems worldwide can be attributed to their numerous
benefits. Effective models of e-courts have been implemented in countries such as Canada, the
United States, India, and Singapore. These models have significantly decreased reliance on
paper-based submissions, improved the efficiency of court processes, and expanded access to
justice. The success of these models illustrates the transformative potential of E-Court systems
in revolutionizing the legal system and providing a more effective and accessible service to the
general public.
Conclusion
To achieve a more efficient, accessible, and cost-effective justice system for all, it is necessary
to revolutionize access to justice in the digital era. E-courts have emerged as a promising
avenue for bringing about this transformation. By promoting alternative methods of dispute
resolution such as online mediation and arbitration, e-courts can alleviate the backlog of cases.
Moreover, by enhancing the efficiency, accessibility, transparency, accountability, and overall
effectiveness of the legal system, e-courts have the potential to reshape access to justice in the
digital age.
The digital age has brought about substantial changes to the justice system, and e-courts
represent a significant advancement in expanding access to justice for all. By enhancing
efficiency, transparency, and fairness, e-courts have the potential to revolutionize the
administration of justice. Particularly for underserved and marginalized communities facing
barriers to traditional court systems, e-courts can greatly improve access to justice. The benefits
extend to all parties involved, as e-courts can reduce costs and expedite case resolution.
Moreover, by increasing transparency, e-courts enable a better understanding and trust in the
legal system by a wider population.
56
Vol VIII Issue II
Despite the progress made in implementing e-courts, there are remaining challenges to
overcome. Ensuring universal access to e-courts regardless of digital literacy or technology
availability is a significant challenge. Furthermore, concerns regarding privacy and data
protection may arise as e-courts become more prevalent, necessitating their careful
consideration and resolution. The transformation of access to justice in the digital age relies on
the successful integration of e-courts. To ensure genuine accessibility for all and maintain
public trust in the legal system, it is essential to address the issues associated with e-courts.
Many individuals face challenges in accessing justice due to various obstacles such as financial
constraints, geographical distance, and lack of information. However, there is an opportunity
to modernize and enhance access to justice in the digital age. E-courts have emerged as a
promising solution in the digital era to enhance access to justice. By leveraging e-courts, the
legal system can become more efficient and reduce case backlogs.
To fully unlock the potential of e-courts, it is essential to take action and ensure their
accessibility to everyone, especially those who may face digital barriers. Collaboration between
governments, civil society organizations, and the corporate sector is necessary to create user-
friendly, secure, and transparent e-court systems. Additionally, investing in training and
capacity building is crucial to equip legal professionals and court personnel with the necessary
skills to effectively utilize digital platforms.
The revolution of access to justice through e-courts requires a concerted effort from all
stakeholders. By taking measures to improve access to e-courts, justice can become more
accessible and effective for all.
57