0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

Courtroom Objections

Used during our Mock Court Trial

Uploaded by

Zapterranosaurus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

Courtroom Objections

Used during our Mock Court Trial

Uploaded by

Zapterranosaurus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Courtroom Objections Examples

Hearsay
Witness says: 'I heard from my neighbor that the defendant was seen leaving the scene right
after the incident.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, I object. The witness is testifying to hearsay, as they have no
personal knowledge of what was said.'

Leading
Attorney asks: 'You saw the defendant throw the bottle, didn’t you?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, I object to the question being leading. It suggests the answer to the
witness.'

Speculation
Witness says: 'I assume that the defendant must have been planning the crime for days.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness is speculating and cannot testify to the defendant's
intentions without direct knowledge.'

Asked and Answered


Attorney asks: 'Where were you when the incident occurred?'
Witness answers: 'I was at the park.'
Attorney asks again: 'And where were you when the incident occurred?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, that question has already been asked and answered.'

Relevance
Attorney says: 'I wish to introduce the defendant’s personal social media posts from two
years ago.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, this evidence is irrelevant to the case and does not relate to the
charges.'

Ambiguous or Unintelligible
Attorney asks: 'Can you clarify what you meant when you said ‘he was acting in a way that
seemed...’?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the question is ambiguous and unclear.'
Compound
Attorney asks: 'Can you tell the court whether you saw the defendant at the scene and what
they were wearing?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the question is compound; it includes two separate questions.'

Argumentative
Attorney says: 'Why do you continue to lie about seeing the defendant at the crime scene?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, that question is argumentative and seeks to argue with the witness.'

Argumentative Objection
Attorney says: 'You know the defendant had a motive, don’t you? How could you not see
that?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the question is argumentative, and the attorney is trying to make an
argument rather than ask a question.'

Authentication Objection
Attorney presents a photograph of the crime scene.
Objection: 'Your Honor, I object. The photograph has not been authenticated to show it
accurately depicts the scene.'

Narrative
Witness says: 'Then I heard the door slam, and I ran outside to see what happened, and
there were people shouting, and the defendant was running away, and—'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness is giving a narrative instead of answering the specific
question.'

Assumes Facts Not in Evidence


Attorney asks: 'When did you first realize that the defendant was involved in the crime?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the question assumes facts not in evidence, as no one has testified
to the defendant's involvement yet.'

Character Evidence
Witness says: 'The defendant has a history of being dishonest, so I’m sure they committed
the crime.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, this is inadmissible character evidence intended to attack the
defendant’s reputation.'
Lay Witness Opinion
Witness says: 'I think the defendant was upset when they did it, because they looked angry.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness is offering an opinion, and they are not qualified to
make judgments on the defendant’s emotions.'

Leading Question Objection


Attorney asks: 'Isn’t it true that you saw the defendant leave the store with a large bag?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, I object. The question is leading and suggests the answer.'

Best Evidence
Attorney says: 'I’ll submit a photocopy of the contract as evidence.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, I object on the grounds of the best evidence rule. The original
contract should be presented.'

Lack of Foundation
Attorney asks: 'What was the defendant thinking when they made that decision?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness has not established the foundation to testify about the
defendant’s mental state.'

Non-Responsive
Attorney asks: 'Where did you first meet the defendant?'
Witness answers: 'I was walking down the street when I heard someone call my name.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness is not answering the question and is being non-
responsive.'

Privilege
Attorney asks: 'What did you discuss with your lawyer during your meeting?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, I invoke attorney-client privilege for that communication.'

The Witness is Incompetent


Attorney calls a 5-year-old child as a witness.
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness is incompetent to testify due to their age and inability to
understand the oath.'
The Witness Lacks Personal Knowledge
Attorney asks: 'Did you see the defendant at the scene of the crime?'
Witness answers: 'I didn’t see it, but I heard from a friend that the defendant was there.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness lacks personal knowledge.'

During Redirect Examination


Attorney says on redirect: 'Now, you did see the defendant leave the scene, correct?'
Objection: 'Your Honor, that question goes beyond the scope of cross-examination.'

Improper Opinion
Witness says: 'I believe the defendant was guilty based on how they acted that day.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, the witness is offering an improper opinion that is not based on
their personal knowledge or expertise.'

Prejudicial
Attorney says: 'The defendant has been arrested multiple times before; they’re a repeat
offender.'
Objection: 'Your Honor, this evidence is prejudicial and meant to improperly sway the jury’s
opinion about the defendant.'

You might also like