Abstract
The doctrine of pleasure is a fundamental principle in service law, derived from
british constitutional law, granting the executive the power to dismiss
government employees at will. However, in india, this doctrine is subject to
constitutional safeguards under articles 309, 310, and 311 of the constitution,
ensuring protection against arbitrary dismissal. This research explores the
historical evolution, legal framework, judicial interpretations, and administrative
safeguards surrounding the doctrine.
It also examines the psychological and ethical implications of job insecurity
among civil servants, the role of judicial review, and comparative practices in
countries like the uk, usa, canada, australia, and germany. While the doctrine
ensures administrative efficiency, its misuse for political purposes raises
concerns about fairness and governance. Strengthening whistleblower
protection, independent tribunals, and ethical bureaucratic practices can
balance executive authority with employee rights. This study provides a
comprehensive analysis of the doctrine’s impact on public administration and
constitutional governance.
Keywords: doctrine of pleasure, service law, article 310, civil servants, judicial
review, constitutional safeguards.
