The Problem of Greed in JRR Tolkien’s The Hobbit
and The Lord of the Rings
Chris Larimore
   Throughout what is referred to as the             Here we see how Tolkien criticizes those that lust
legendarium of JRR Tolkien, the underlying           after wealth and are completely selfish and
value of objects and deeds is a prominent motif.     driven by greed: to hoard vast wealth and to keep
Beginning with The Hobbit in 1937 and                it all to one’s self is one of the greatest vices an
continuing through The Lord of the Rings (1954-      individual can be guilty of, with the eventual end
55), Tolkien constructs a narrative that builds on   proving that no good will come from it.
the struggles of class warfare and the problems
                                                         The same can be said of the Dwarves
wealth brings, both intellectual and financial,
                                                     themselves, many of whom do not learn from the
with a key focus on the problems of greed. In this
                                                     destruction of the dragon. Thorin Oakenshield,
paper, I aim to outline Tolkien’s philosophy on
                                                     for example, leader of the Dwarven band that is
how greed corrupts many of the protagonists in
                                                     the focus of The Hobbit, falls after the Battle of
the Middle-earth he created, as well as highlight
                                                     the Five Armies; he was driven solely by a lust
his insertion of the problems of the real world.
                                                     for wealth, letting nothing stand in his way. His
         The moral dilemma of greed in both The      greed got the better of him even before the group
Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings is a prominent      left Bag End. However, only when it is too late
theme, driving the narrative forward as              does Thorin see the folly in pursuing wealth for
characters become bogged down in the ethical         greedy purposes: he overcomes death due to
and moral choices and consequences of their          avarice with an act of great humility, repenting
actions. It is plain to see, for example, that the   his greed. To Bilbo – the most humble, selfless,
Dwarves in The Hobbit are not driven by a desire     least greed-driven of the band – he says, “There
for freedom from tyranny, or to create a             is more in you of good than you know, child of
utilitarian utopia, but are rather driven almost     the kindly West…If more of us valued food and
completely by greed, to recover the hoard of         cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a
treasure guarded by the great dragon Smaug in        merrier world” (290), finally admitting that
the depths of the Lonely Mountain. The dragon        happiness is where there is an absence of greed
made many enemies in his own lust and greed,         and materialism.
which would ultimately lead to his destruction at
                                                        Another of the party of Dwarves falls victim
the hands of Bard the Bowman on the edges of
                                                     to avarice and greed also, but this comes later:
the lake town of Esgaroth (The Hobbit 228-9).
The Problem of Greed in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings                                                    65
Balin, cousin to Gimli of the Fellowship of the           wealth and live symbiotically with nature. Greed
Ring, returns to the stronghold of Moria in search        does not seem to exist in the Elves of Tolkien’s
of the vast wealth it is rumored to contain,              narrative, perhaps illustrating his philosophy on
despite warnings of a shapeless, nameless fear            how we should live in the real world.
that later is revealed to be a Balrog (fire-demon),
                                                              Throughout The Hobbit, greed drives the
also known as Durin’s Bane (the reason Moria
                                                          Dwarves onward, while the only thing driving
was left deserted in the first place). The wealth of
                                                          poor Bilbo Baggins on is the chance of a
Moria, as we learn from Gandalf during the
                                                          comfortable bed and the possibility of a hearty
Fellowship’s passage through its vast network,
                                                          meal; his desires are much less substantial than
comes from a substance called Mithril; as he
                                                          his companions because he has never known
describes it, Tolkien creates a mythos round the
                                                          what greed or desire for power are. He was
substance that would draw anyone towards it:
                                                          always – as are all hobbits according to Tolkien –
      Mithril! All folk desired it. It could be           quite content to live within one’s means, for as
      beaten like copper, and polished like glass;        Bilbo himself says, “it is no sin to live a simple
      and the Dwarves could make of it a metal,           life.” Little did he suspect that he would become
      light and yet harder than tempered steel. Its       the catalyst for the re-emergence of the greatest
      beauty was like to that of common silver,           evil in the narrative – and almost the
      but the beauty of mithril did not tarnish or        personification of evil in Tolkien’s work – the
      grow dim. (The Fellowship of the Ring               Dark Lord Sauron. In the deepest roots of the
      309; emphasis in original)                          Misty Mountains, Bilbo stumbles upon a ring; it
                                                          is unusual for something like that to be in such a
    Such material would be worth risking
                                                          desolate and remote place, but curiosity makes
everything for, surely. However, Tolkien’s
                                                          him keep it. Not greed, though, as Bilbo has
criticism of greed and self-interest here illustrate
                                                          never known greed. Hobbits are a very simple
how concerned he was with the way things were
                                                          folk, keeping themselves within their own lands,
changing in the world around him. He had a
                                                          “[possessing] the art of disappearing swiftly and
dislike for giant machines and industrial works,
                                                          silently, when large folk whom they do not wish
favoring nature and simpler things – hence his
                                                          to meet come blundering by” (The Fellowship of
decision to become a horse-breaker during the
                                                          the Ring 1), living an agrarian (almost Amish-
First World War. Working with animals and
                                                          like) existence. There are no grand palaces or
nature was a passion for him, mainly because
                                                          lordly halls – the most lavish dwelling of the
they were free, not just in terms of being able to
                                                          hobbits is an extended series of tunnels and
roam at will, but because they had no desire for
                                                          rooms excavated by the Brandybucks on the
material possessions. Greed does not exist in the
                                                          borders of Buckland. Tolkien’s hobbits are
natural world, and Tolkien shows this in the
                                                          simple, peaceful, content with their lot, and
depiction of the Elves in particular. Many of the
                                                          (most importantly) generous; for example, when
Elves we meet in his more popular novels live in
                                                          it comes to a hobbit’s birthday, it is the one who’s
woods: Legolas is from the realm of Mirkwood;
                                                          birthday it is who gives presents to their party
Galadriel and the lord Celeborn live in
                                                          guests, not receiving any! Greed, therefore, is not
Lothlorien, where, instead of demolishing the
                                                          something one would associate with hobbits…
wood to make space to live, they utilize the trees
                                                          unless they are Sackville-Bagginses (Bilbo’s
themselves, showing no desire to master nature;
                                                          wealthy and greedy cousins).
conversely, they wish to draw from its vast
                                                       Plaza: Dialogues in Language and Literature 2.2 (Spring 2012)
The Problem of Greed in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings                                                      66
    Within the simple existence of hobbits,                 Ring freely down to Frodo, Bilbo shows that
Tolkien presents for the reader a view of how life          even the greatest item of wealth and temptation
could be if we were to shed ourselves of greed              can be given up. Critics have argued that this is
and desire for power. Despite his experiences in            simply due to Bilbo not knowing exactly what he
the First World War, and the gathering clouds of            possessed, and that if he had known, The Hobbit
war again across Europe, Tolkien’s view of                  and The Lord of the Rings would be completely
humanity never changed very much. He did                    different novels. Of course they would, but in
everything he could to show his readers that                choosing the route of having Bilbo give up the
living within one’s own means, and not for the              Ring of his own free will, Tolkien presents a
pursuit of wealth and power, is for the greater             character who is the embodiment of hope for the
benefit of all. It is arguable that Tolkien                 world, someone that is not overcome by greed
constructed this idea of peace within the                   and lust for great wealth and dominance. Bilbo is
narrative of The Lord of the Rings to be a tale of          content with his lot; he has overcome the allure
the most humble overcoming the most arrogant                of great power, unlike many of the Ring’s other
of forces. Hobbits help to bring down Sauron                unfortunate Bearers.
(and Saruman, not to mention myriad other evil
                                                                Let’s now consider wealth as it appears in The
creatures), despite being little more than farmers,
                                                            Hobbit’s sequel, The Lord of the Rings. As with
brewers, cooks, and carpenters, who “do not and
                                                            The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings has greed as
did not understand or like machines more
                                                            its driving narrative force, but in varying degrees.
complicated than a forge bellows, a water-mill,
                                                            Instead of having a single band greedily pursuing
or a hand-loom, though they were skillful with
                                                            riches (the Dwarves ironically being cast as the
tools” (1). Services are often repaid in kind,
                                                            ‘good’ guys), The Lord of the Rings contains
rather than by exchanging currency. Wealth, then,
                                                            many interwoven plots revolving around the
does not feature as a driving force for victory, but
                                                            Ring’s recovery, destruction, and power. This
rather the power of individual spirit and
                                                            illustrates Tolkien’s concerns for a world that is
conviction; the ability to work together in a
                                                            becoming ill at ease with itself, fighting against
classless, non-hierarchical society allows the
                                                            itself more and more, with people using others to
hobbits to live freely.
                                                            get to the top. The Fellowship itself sets out from
    As for the Ring, the driving force for greed in         Rivendell on a quest to eliminate the one thing
much of Tolkien’s work, while it represents a               that has brought them all together: the Ring of
source of wealth due to its construction                    Sauron. The One Ring. It is interesting that
(presumably of gold), its magical qualities are             Tolkien describes it as ‘the One’, since there are
what make it valuable. Its ability to make the              many other rings of power, but obviously this
Bearer invisible is a trick Bilbo employs to great          one “rules them all”:
effect – escaping Gollum (The Hobbit 78-84),
                                                                 Three Rings for the Elven-Kings under the sky,
making it in to Smaug’s keep and stealing the                    Seven for the Dewarf-lords in their halls of
Arkenstone (217), leaving the Shire at the                       stone,
beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring (30; 35).                Nine for Mortal men doomed to die,
However, as with so many things, the power                       One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
comes at a heavy price: the Bearer becomes tired,                In the land of Mordor where the shadows lie.
living much longer than normal, a shadow of                      One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find
their former self (after a while, almost literally, if           them,
one were to keep using it). But in passing the
                                                         Plaza: Dialogues in Language and Literature 2.2 (Spring 2012)
The Problem of Greed in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings                                                    67
    One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness        indeed, acquires – wealth through selfish and
    bind them                                             misguided means.
    In the land of Mordor where the shadows lie.
    (Letters 153)                                             Imagine in our world, if we had to make a
                                                          choice: continue suffering under the relentless
    That is not all, though: it is also the single        oppression of those in power, stripping away our
most important object in the world at that time,          financial stability and sense of what is morally
the fate of the world depends upon what happens           right; or, stand up to tyranny, destroy that which
to this Ring. The one thing standing between              they covet, and live as though we depended on
freedom and tyranny is the destruction of the             each other, not because we had to but because we
object that will provide the most wealth to its           want to. This was, in a nutshell, Tolkien’s
owner, for as Tolkien himself says, the only way          criticism of a power-hungry, greedy society that
Sauron could be truly defeated is if “some other          had the potential to lose control and destroy
seized [the One Ring] and became possessed of             itself, both financially and physically. He was
it” (ibid.). The ‘shadow’ cast by the Ring extends        always careful, however, not to get caught up in
even beyond its physical being, consuming the             the world of politics – at least, not directly. When
minds of those who desire the wealth of                   asked if his literary work was an allegory of the
knowledge and riches that absolute power can              20th century by Sir Milton Waldman in 1951,
bring about. The Gondorian Steward, Denethor,             Tolkien stated that he disliked allegory, both
is one of the few characters in The Lord of the           “conscious and intentional”, arguing instead that
Rings who is completely obsessed with retaining           his works were simply discussions of “Fall,
(and gaining more) power, since he is but a               Morality and the Machine” (Letters 145). The
Steward, “a man of [great] lineage, though he is          science fiction author, Isaac Asimov, did,
not called king,” as Gandalf tells Pippin before          however, considered The Lord of the Rings to be
they meet him (The Return of the King 737).               an allegory, this time in terms of the Ring being a
Gandalf also tells the young hobbit to “leave             symbol of modern technology, of industrial
quiet the matter of Frodo’s errand,” because              revolution and so on; the driving force behind the
Denethor desires the Ring of power for himself            narrative is also the driving force that is moving
(hence the reason for his son, Boromir, to be at          the world forward.
the Council of Elrond). Denethor believes that
the Ring will give him the power and strength to              With regard to the Ring as an heirloom, a
defeat the forces of Mordor, against which he has         symbol of power and wealth, its effects can be
been defending his realm (and those of all                seen most clearly in the characters of the Nazgul,
Middle-earth) for many years, and will allow him          the Ring-Wraiths. Early in Sauron’s quest for
to be crowned King. His greed and desire to be            power, under the disguise of the Ainur Annatar,
supreme ruler make him dysfunctional and                  he created a series of rings, bestowing them upon
foolhardy (though there are other factors that are        the peoples of Middle-earth freely: within the
not directly pertinent to this discussion – those of      rings was the power to govern each race (though
Denethor’s use of the palantír, his knowledge of          it is not clear how they would be governed). The
Aragorn’s lineage, etc.), but they nevertheless           Dwarves had seven rings, but did not use them to
have a direct affect on the battle for Middle-            their full might: they were simply heirlooms,
earth. Denethor’s greed, then, is an example of           nothing more. The Elves made three rings, but
Tolkien’s dislike for anyone that desires – or,           Annatar/Sauron did not touch them, so his greed
                                                          and evil did not taint them. Men, however, used
                                                       Plaza: Dialogues in Language and Literature 2.2 (Spring 2012)
The Problem of Greed in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings                                                    68
the nine rings they were given, and all was               can do for him, not how it can better the world
brought to darkness. The great Kings of Men fell          around him.
to their greed and the lust for power that the rings
                                                              As for Gollum/Sméagol, his story is fairly
brought, falling under the influence of the Ruling
                                                          obvious to any that have read the books or seen
Ring. At the beginning of The Lord of the Rings,
                                                          Peter Jackson’s adaptation: he has been
they are unleashed, sent to track down their
                                                          consumed by greed completely, shunning all
Master’s ring, forever bound to it through fear,
                                                          forms of companionship save that of his
desire and greed.
                                                          “Precious”, the Ring that (arguably) converses
    Saruman, head of the White Council and                with him, telling him what to do, how to be,
traitor to Middle-earth, also desires to possess the      where to go. After losing the Ring, Gollum
Ring for himself, feigning friendship and loyalty         becomes enraged, a burning desire envelops him
to Sauron in order to gain power: the arguable            to find his one treasured possession at all costs:
‘bargain with the devil’ of Tolkien’s narrative. In
                                                               [Gollum] had lost it: lost his prey [Bilbo],
doing so, his greed becomes his strength as well
                                                               and lost, too, the only thing he ever cared for,
as his weakness. Of course, should Saruman
                                                               his precious… “Thief, thief, thief! Baggins!
come in to possession of the One Ring he would
                                                               We hates it, we hates it, we hates it forever!”
not turn it over to Sauron, but use it himself to
                                                               (The Hobbit 82)
usurp Sauron as Dark Lord and ruler of Middle-
earth; as with all those who have desired the                  He lifted his head again, blinked at the
Ring for themselves through the long history of                moon, and quickly shut his eyes. “We hates
the Ring, it will prove to be his downfall.                    it,’ he hissed. “Nassty [sic], nassty shivery
Saruman joins the likes of Isildur, Gollum,                    light it is – sss – it spies on us, precious – it
Boromir, even (as I believe) Frodo Baggins, the                hurts our eyes.”
so-called ‘hero’ of The Lord of the Rings (but that
                                                               …“Where iss [sic] it, where iss it: my
is subject to only brief discussion later). In a
                                                               Precious, my Precious? It’s our’s, it is, and
world where companionship, trust, pride and
                                                               we wants it. The thieves, the thieves, the
dignity are the ruling forces of morality, greed
                                                               filthy little thieves.” (The Two Towers 599)
and material wealth hold no place in the social
order of things, and all those that pursue these              Clearly, Gollum has been completely
negative morals almost always come to an end,             consumed by greed over the “Precious,” the One
with very rare instances of repentance. A lot can         Ring, and when he loses it, he thinks Bilbo has
be learned from characters such as Thorin and             tricked him, and so curses the names of Baggins
Boromir, as both openly repent of their lust for          and Hobbits forever for stealing the only thing he
power and wealth, albeit on their deathbeds;              ever cared for. Indeed, it is ironic that Gollum
Isildur (King of Gondor and the one who                   curses Bilbo for ‘stealing’ the Ring, when all
removed the Ring from Sauron at the end of the            Bilbo did was ‘find’ it; Gollum, on the other
Second Age – approximately 3000 years before              hand, is the real thief in the long history of the
Frodo came to possess it) kept the Ring for               Ring, as Gandalf explained to Frodo:
himself, instead of destroying it, thus ending all
evil: Tolkien’s criticism of mankind’s greed and               “Give us that, Déagol, my love,” said
wish to dominate is personified in Isildur, as he              Sméagol, over his friend’s shoulder.
thinks only of himself and what material wealth                “Why?” said Déagol.
                                                       Plaza: Dialogues in Language and Literature 2.2 (Spring 2012)
The Problem of Greed in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings                                                    69
      “Because it’s my birthday, my love, and I           the Ring instilled in its possessor. Some may
      wants it, said Sméagol.                             argue that Tolkien is implying that one cannot
                                                          sometimes help but fall to desire and greed, and
      “I don’t care… I found this, and I’m going
                                                          this may be true, but to have him come so far
      to keep it.”
                                                          only to fail utterly is a problematic issue for me,
      “Oh, are you indeed, my love,” said                 and one that requires more discussion than time
      Sméagol; and he caught Déagol by the                permits here. I simply mention it here to illustrate
      throat and strangled him, because the gold          the problems greed can cause if given enough
      looked so bright and beautiful. Then he put         time to develop: had Frodo been able to destroy
      the ring on his finger.” (The Fellowship of         the Ring sooner (or, even, without going all the
      the Ring 52)                                        way to Mordor, where its powers are magnified),
                                                          he would perhaps have been successful and
    The Ring has a power that only a few can              saved himself as well as Middle-earth. Instead,
withstand, so it is understandable that a lowly,          he does not succeed in destroying the Ring,
common creature like Sméagol would fall prey to           having claimed it for his own – he simply loses
its controlling influences. Sméagol, of course,           it, and it ‘accidentally’ falls into the fires of
does not immediately know what he has come in             Orodruin with Gollum. Frodo is unable to live in
to possession of, but he quickly learns that he can       a world where he cannot have the Ring – his
use its magical properties to his advantage,              ‘Precious’ – and so he has to eventually leave; he
making himself extremely powerful in relative             craves what he cannot have, and cannot live in
terms: he sneaks in and out of rooms, gathers             peace without it: this, arguably, is an appropriate
information that he uses to blackmail people, all         definition of greed.
thanks to the invisibility the Ring bestows on its
bearer when worn. This pursuit of material                   The real world is, of course, filled with
wealth ultimately brings about his (timely)               instances of people doing things for the right
downfall in the fires of Mount Doom, along with           reasons, only to end up failing at what they do,
the fate of our ‘hero’, Frodo Baggins.                    but it is the wealth of knowledge that one gathers
                                                          on the way and the conviction of one’s actions
   Frodo is seen by many as the ultimate hero in          that proves to be the true wealth of a person, in
The Lord of the Rings: he remains loyal to his
                                                          Tolkien’s estimation at least. Possessions, wealth,
companions (mostly), he never deviates from his           greed, they all come and go, but the one thing
appointed task, and he shows great kindness and           that remains constant in all of us is honesty. If we
humility towards Gollum/Sméagol, mainly                   are to get through the troubled times we live in
because he sees that he will become that piteous          today, we must take a page out of Tolkien’s
creature should he fail to destroy the Ring.              works and become more like his kind, heroic,
However, I believe that Frodo becomes a villain           honest, charming hobbits. We need to live in a
of the narrative, due to the important point that         world where we take care of one another, not
he ultimately fails to destroy the Ring; not only         compete against everyone all the time; we need
that, but he keeps it for himself, declaring “I have      to help each other through crises, just like the
come… But I will not choose now to do what I              great Samwise Gamgee; we need to consider all
came to do. I will not do this deed. The Ring is          paths, choosing the one that will cause the least
mine!” (The Return of the King 924). As Isildur           harm to all, like Gandalf; and above all, we must
did 3000 years before, Frodo had overcome great           start to alleviate ourselves of a quest for wealth,
mortal peril, but succumbed to the lust and greed         power and greed, for otherwise we, too, will fall
                                                       Plaza: Dialogues in Language and Literature 2.2 (Spring 2012)
The Problem of Greed in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings                                                      70
in to the Mountain of Doom: as a society we will                                Works Cited
become Gollum, shunning all that is good in the          Carpenter, Humphrey (Ed.). The Letters of JRR Tolkien.
world and become utterly selfish. This is not the        Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company, 2000. Print.
world Tolkien created, nor is it the one we should
continue to live in.                                     Shippey, Tom. JRR Tolkien: Author of the Century.
                                                         Glasgow: Harper-Collins Publishers, 2000. Print.
                                                         --. The Road to Middle-earth. UK: Grafton, 1992. Print.
                                                         Tolkien, JRR. The Lord of the Rings: The Hobbit or, There
                                                         and Back Again (75th Anniversary Edition). Glasgow:
                                                         Harper-Collins Publishers, 2011. Print.
                                                         --. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.
                                                         Glasgow: Harper-Collins Publishers, 1997. Print.
                                                         --. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.
                                                         Glasgow: Harper-Collins Publishers, 1997. Print.
                                                         --. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Glasgow:
                                                              Harper-Collins Publishers, 1997.
                                                      Plaza: Dialogues in Language and Literature 2.2 (Spring 2012)