http://wjel.sciedupress.com                          World Journal of English Language                                  Vol. 13, No.
5; 2023
    Flipped Classroom: An Effective Methodology to Improve Writing Skills of
                                 EFL Students
                                                    Taj Mohammad1, & Soada Idris Khan2
1
    Associate Professor (English) at Najran University, Saudi Arabia
2
    Assistant Professor (English) at Najran University, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence: Soada Idris Khan, Assistant Professor (English) at Najran University, Saudi Arabia.
Received: January 15, 2023           Accepted: February 26, 2023       Online Published: March 3, 2023
doi:10.5430/wjel.v13n5p468                URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n5p468
Abstract
This study proposes a flipped classroom methodology in the context of a group pre/post-quasi-experimental study to improve the writing
skills of EFL students, with a particular emphasis on writing topic sentences, supporting sentences, concluding sentences, adjectives,
adverbs, and sentence structures correctly. The research sample consisted of 25 EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students studying
the course titled ―Technical Report Writing,‖ adopting flipped classroom methodology. The effectiveness of students' writing skills before
and after the experiment was evaluated by researchers through pre- and post-experimental exams. Results for the post-test were
influenced by the dependent-sample t-test. It was determined that the flipped classroom remarkably improved EFL students' writing
abilities. Other EFL teaching and learning challenges may be addressed through implications with the additional study into flipped
classroom approaches.
Keywords: dramatic improvement, EFL students, flipped classroom, writing concerns
1. Introduction
Flipped classrooms are an emerging approach in which teaching (theoretical part) takes place at home using technology and practice, and
assignment creation takes place in the classroom with teachers and other classmates (Lage, Platt, & Treglia, 2000). Teachers provide
students in class with active support in writing paragraphs, solving writing problems, and dealing with the technical aspects of writing.
Through the use of classroom games and activities, flipped classrooms encourage student participation in group discussions and
problem-solving. (Triantafyllou & Timcenko, 2014). Therefore, the flipped model is an embodiment of active learning (Hamdan,
McKnight, McKnight, & Arfstrom, 2013). Flipped learning is a model that views students as active participants in planning their own
education (Albert & Beatty, 2014).
Students in an EFL situation, especially in KSA, face several challenges in writing classes. EFL and ESL primarily focus on improving
the writing skills of students taking 151 Technical Writing Course. The course title itself predicts that it involves complex and
multidimensional tasks such as formulating a concept, drafting, revising the write-up, and rectifying mistakes (Richards & Renandya,
2002). It is commonly acknowledged that several EFL students find writing to be a difficult task (Soltanpour & Valizadeh, 2018).
Moreover, writing paragraphs is the most crucial task in a technical writing class. It tests the cognitive abilities of the writer because it
requires thinking, language skills, and a trained memory (Kellogg, 2001). The cognizance of perceptions related to writing, such as topic
sentences, supporting sentences, concluding sentences, and using adverbs, adjectives, and sentence structure correctly results in writing
better paragraphs. Additionally, authors have to review and edit multiple times what they write, making writing an intimidating task.
Writing paragraphs that satisfy one of the objectives of the technical writing course is difficult for EFL students in Saudi Arabia. A
paragraph in itself is a combination of many components like a topic sentence, supporting sentences, concluding sentences, various
grammatical components, etc. Due to the fact that it enables adequate assessment of many variables, paragraph writing is necessary for
technical writing courses. It is also concerning because, despite this, students rarely receive higher grades in technical writing courses.
Researchers contend that traditional teaching techniques, a lack of student enthusiasm, a lack of time for practice in class, and a lack of
awareness of the value of English as a global language for oral and written communication are the main causes of this issue.
To help students become adept writers and improve their writing skills, several EFL teachers consider creative ways to improve their
English writing skills. One such example is flipped teaching/learning which has lately gained popularity as an innovative way to make
better use of classroom time, interact and engage in active learning (Adnan, 2017). Blended learning is compliant with the flipped model.
According to Staker and Horn (2012), blended learning is an interactive process in which students gain knowledge from both online
resources and traditional textbooks. As part of the flipped classroom format, teachers share videos of their lessons with students. Students
can watch the video at home and understand the theoretical part. It provides students with the freedom to watch the video over and over
again until they develop a good understanding of the respective concepts. Students then attempt the exercises in class with their
classmates (as part of collaborative learning) and teachers assist them in facing challenges while writing topic sentences, supporting
Published by Sciedu Press                                      468                                   ISSN 1925-0703      E-ISSN 1925-0711
http://wjel.sciedupress.com                          World Journal of English Language                                    Vol. 13, No. 5; 2023
sentences, and concluding sentences. Teachers guide them in inserting adjectives and adverbs correctly in a sentence and writing a proper
sentence structure (as part of writing a paragraph), especially in a technical writing class. In this method, teachers are merely facilitators
who encourage students to collaborative learning and resultantly they take charge of their learning. As a swimmer cannot learn to swim
until he or she jumps into the water, the same is the case with a writing class as they cannot learn to write until they practice it themselves.
The flipped classroom encourages a student-centered class for writing paragraphs.
As Triantafyllou and Timcenko (2014) emphasized, ―flipped classrooms can be beneficial for students'' (p.1), this research implements a
flipped-classroom approach to address students‘ writing issues due to several advantages associated with it. Unfortunately, there are very
few flipped classroom researchers in Saudi Arabia despite the several benefits it encompasses. Al-Harbi and Alshumaimeri (2016) assert,
―However, one promising approach that uses technology in teaching, the flipped classroom strategy, had not yet been studied in the EFL
Saudi Arabian context‖ (p. 60). And they further state, ―While the flipped classroom strategy has shown success elsewhere, it had never
been tried in the context of Saudi culture and the Saudi education system‖ (p.61). That was a real motivating factor for the research in
Saudi Arabia. Flipped classroom method yielded very positive results when it was implemented at the PY Unit of Najran University. This
research is based on the following objectives:
1.1 Objectives of the Study
     1.   To diagnose writing problems of EFL students with special reference to topic sentences, supporting sentences, concluding
          sentences, adjectives, adverbs, and sentence structures
     2.   To identify substantial transformations in students' write-ups after employing flipped classroom method
2. Literature Review
Flipped learning/teaching is a pedagogical strategy that challenges conventional ideas of classroom learning. Unlike a traditional
classroom, in a flipped classroom, students are accustomed to familiarizing themselves with the topic before class and deepening their
understanding through problem-solving exercises during class (Shih & Huang, 2020; Wang & Qi, 2018).
There are various kinds of flipped classrooms, including the discussion model and the role-reversal model. According to Demirel (2017),
these models may be appropriate for subjects like language that is relevant to the situation. They also make it possible to use technological
tools to help teach various facets of language. Students learning progresses as they employ technology in their everyday life. According to
Wells, de Lange, and Fieger (2008), technology has altered how teachers and students teach and learn. Because of this, teachers are
constantly looking for unusual ways to employ technology to enhance the learning of their students (Koehler, Mishra, Hershey, & Peruski,
2004). Whenever possible, technology has been used in the classroom because technology offers multiple opportunities for language
teachers (Seljan, Banek, Špiranec & Lasić-Lazić, 2006).
In a significant study, Qadar and Arslan (2019) investigated the influence of flipped classrooms on EFL learners‘ writing skills in Iraq. 66
students of Salahaddin University from the Department of English, Faculty of Linguistics, participated in this study. Using mixed methods,
the researchers indicated that experimental students wrote better than control students. Students‘ attitudes to the flipped classroom were
positive.
In their 2019 publication, Rahman, Yunus, and Hashim compiled research on flipped classroom instruction in Malaysia. The researchers
found 19 research articles on flipped classrooms. According to their findings, the majority of these investigations yielded insightful results,
and FCI (flipped classroom instruction) was highly praised by both students and teachers. They came to the conclusion that the FCI ought
to be implemented across the board in schooling.
In another remarkable study, Al-Harbi and Alshumaimeri (2016) applied FCI junior high school students to English grammar tool students.
The researcher uploaded a video of the lesson to her Edmodo website before teaching it to the experimental group of students. The control
group students were taught through the traditional approach. Students' opinions regarding the use of FCI were favorable. The
experimental group's post-test outcomes were also excellent.
None of the above-mentioned researchers looked at how using flipped classroom techniques to promote L1 writing affected students at
Najran University, notably the PY unit, which has the highest proportion of EFL students. As a result, the study becomes more significant.
The following research questions are addressed by this paper.
2.1 Research Questions
          1. What are the writing problems faced by EFL students?
          2. Are there any substantial transformations in students' write-ups after employing the flipped classroom?
3. Methodology
3.1 Research Design
The study followed the quasi-experimental method to achieve the study objectives. It employed a one-group pretest-posttest design. The
effectiveness of any particular treatment on particular learners can be determined using this method (Creswell, 2009). The method
involved:
·A pretest for both groups.
Published by Sciedu Press                                      469                                      ISSN 1925-0703     E-ISSN 1925-0711
http://wjel.sciedupress.com                               World Journal of English Language                             Vol. 13, No. 5; 2023
·The conduction of the experiment for both groups.
·A post-test for both groups
The purpose of this study was to find writing problems among EFL students. After applying the flipped classroom method, the researcher
observed the differences in students writing performance.
3.2 Sampling
This research was carried out during the preparatory year of Najran University. Twenty-five (Level 2) students were selected using
convenient sampling.
3.3 Data Collection Tools and Procedures
         Assessment checklist
A checklist for evaluating students' writing abilities was developed by researchers. The checklist is split into six categories: topic
sentences, supporting sentences, concluding sentences, adjectives, adverbs, and sentence structure.
         t-test
The researchers employed paired-sample t-tests to illustrate the significance of the variance between the pre-test and post-test means, as
shown in Table 3. There is significant difference between the means. Two-Tailed hypothesis, the sample proportion (denoted by π) is not
equal to a specific value which is represented by π0.
                                                                     H1 : π ≠ π0
3.4 Validity (Assessment Checklist)
Six specialists (from the English Department at Najran University) were given the assessment checklist to evaluate its face validity. The
evaluation checklist was updated in light of their suggestions and feedback.
The assessment checklist's six domains—topic sentences, supporting sentences, concluding sentences, adjectives, adverbs, and sentence
structure—were included in the final version.
         Reliability (Assessment checklist)
Researchers used an empirical sample of fifteen students to apply the assessment criteria. Another experienced researcher also evaluated it.
The stability of the correctors (observers) was calculated through the Holste equation = the percentage of the number of times of
agreement / (the number of times of agreement + the number of times of disagreement). The reliability coefficients for the assessment
checklist are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. The assessment checklist‘s reliability coefficients
               No     Issues of Writing Domains      Number of agreements      Number of disagreements   Reliability coefficients
               1      Topic sentence                 13                        2                         78.0
               2      Supporting sentences           12                        3                         78.7
               3      Concluding sentences           13                        2                         78.0
               4      Adjectives                     11                        4                         7800
               5      Adverbs                        21                        0                         78.7
               6      Sentence Structure             20                        1                         78.0
                      Total                          04                        26                        78.1
The assessment checklist's coefficient factor, as shown in Table 1, is (0.82). The assessment checklist's accuracy is indicated by its high
percentage.
Additionally, the flipped classroom approach was also applied in the classroom using the following process.
      i.   Students were instructed to read the six writing topics: Topic Sentence, Supporting Sentence, Concluding Sentence,
     Adjectives, Adverbs, and Sentence Structure at home.
      ii.   The researchers who are also the teachers also uploaded some videos on the same topics in LMS for students to watch before
     they come to the class.
    iii.  When the students came to the class, teachers addressed their doubts on the same topic and clarified many of the doubts.
    Teachers got sufficient time to practice as the students had already read about the topics at home.
Teachers especially focused on facilitating the class while students were writing. Teachers implemented the following tasks:
          1.       Assign a topic and ask the students to write a topic sentence.
Published by Sciedu Press                                          470                               ISSN 1925-0703      E-ISSN 1925-0711
http://wjel.sciedupress.com                        World Journal of English Language                                  Vol. 13, No. 5; 2023
          2.   Based on the topic sentences, students were guided to write the supporting sentences.
          3.   Based on the topic and supporting sentences, students were motivated to write a concluding sentence.
          4.   Motivated EFL students to write simple sentences while using adjectives and adverbs properly.
          5.   Encouraged students to write the correct sentence structure: subject-verb agreement, sequencing the different parts of a
               sentence correctly, etc.
          6.   Offered feedback to EFL students‘ write-ups.
          7.   Reviewed the write-ups as acquired by EFL students.
          8.   In order to determine whether the flipped classroom approach is beneficial, researchers conducted a test (post-test). The
               students' writing skills have greatly increased.
However, because of the limits of this study, further writing problems could not be addressed.
3.5 Data Analysis Methods
The study's exploratory samples, consisting of fifteen students, were subjected to the assessment checklist. Another experienced
researcher also provided their opinion. The stability of the correctors (observers) was calculated through the Holste equation = the
percentage of the number of times of agreement / (the number of times of agreement + the number of times of disagreement) as shown in
Table 1. The importance of the difference between the pre-test and post-test means was demonstrated by researchers using paired t-tests,
as shown in Table 3.
4. Results
4.1 Findings from Study Question 1: What Are the Writing Issues Faced by EFL Students?
Table 2 shows the checklist that the researchers used to assess the writing difficulties of EFL students. They focused on the topic
sentences, supporting sentences, concluding sentences, adjectives, adverbs, and sentence structure.
Table 2. Samples of writing to help teachers recognize students' writing problems
Table 2 displays three different samples (poor, good, and best) of each category namely topic sentences, supporting sentences, concluding
sentences, adjectives, adverbs, and sentence structure. The samples show that students are very weak in English. They cannot identify and
discriminate among different grammatical items. However, after implementing the flipped classroom method, students improved their
performance as shown in the samples.
Published by Sciedu Press                                     471                                  ISSN 1925-0703     E-ISSN 1925-0711
http://wjel.sciedupress.com                          World Journal of English Language                                    Vol. 13, No. 5; 2023
4.2 Research Question 2 Results
The significance of the differences between the means on the pre- and post-tests was determined by the researcher using a t-test of the paired
samples, as shown in Table 3.
Table 3. T-test (paired samples) to demonstrate the significance of differences in the means of the study sample's scores on the pre and
posttests
                   Domain                     Mean         Std. Deviation           t       df      Sig. (2-tailed)     Effect size   level
                                   Pretest     1.68               1.3
        Topic Sentence                                                         -15.501- 24               .000               3.2       large
                                  Posttest     4.01             1.120
                                   Pretest     1.65             1.036
      Supporting Sentence                                                      -10.024- 24               .000              2.00       large
                                  Posttest     3.93             1.352
                                   Pretest      .81              .957
     Concluding Sentence                                                        -3.589-     24           .001              0.72       large
                                  Posttest     1.76             1.332
                                   Pretest     3.33             1.376
        Using Adjective                                                         -5.599-     24           .000              1.13       large
                                  Posttest     4.85              .474
                                   Pretest     1.85             1.180
         Using Adverb                                                           -8.089-     24           .000              1.63       large
                                  Posttest     4.44              .822
                                   Pretest     1.17              .899
       Sentence Structure                                                      -11.339- 24               .000              2.28       large
                                  Posttest     4.49             1.194
                                   Pretest    10.46             2.647
             Total                                                             -16.783- 24               .000              3.37       large
                                  Posttest    23.45             3.178
Table 3 shows that the means of the pretest and post-test tests differ statistically significantly. The level of significance (α=, 0.05) and
confidence interval (95%), support the post-test with a sizable effect size.
5. Discussion
The analysis demonstrates the value of flipped classroom initiatives for improving student performance. A t-test (paired sample) was
employed in this research. This demonstrates that there is a statistically significant difference between the mean writing performance of the
pre-and post-tests (t=16.783; p0.05). The student‘s performance has improved considerably as a result of the flip classroom concept.
These findings align with other research that has revealed favorable opinions of flipped classrooms (Abdulla et al., 2019; Amiryousefi,
2017; Bergman & Sams, 2014; Doman & Webb, 2017; Haghighi, et al., 2019; Huynh & Nguyen, 2019). The findings of the current study
also concur with those of Ekmekci (2017) and Abdulla et al. (2019), who showed how flipped classrooms could improve EFL learners'
written skills.
In writing practice, the proposed methodology is based on flipped classroom methodology and provides a systematic framework for
identifying difficulties, collecting data, creating unique ideas, improving them, and testing the final results. The researchers also found that
when writing about their subjects, participants engaged in more discussions and negotiations. This enabled them to better understand the
topic and share new perspectives, thereby improving their writing quality.
This study concurs with another study by Alghasab (2020) who agreed that flipped classrooms improved students' ability to write a correct
topic sentence. In this study, 50% of students believed that adopting a flipped classroom had improved their use of grammar in written
assignments. As the experiment for the current study continued for the entire semester, it provided the participants with enough opportunity
to improve their writing skills through consistent practice. There is a major difference in the write-ups of students after employing the
flipped classroom method. The study supports Iyitoluand Erişen (2017), who studied the impact of the flip model on the overall academic
performance of pre-university students in EFL and related skills. Six independent sample t-tests were conducted, and the results showed
that the implementation of flipped models had a significant impact on overall EFL performance and overall sub-skills.
The flipped classroom method proved to be very effective in teaching grammatical items to students. Students improved in using adjectives
and adverbs correctly. They also improved in writing correct sentence structure that involves many grammatical items.
Yang's 2017 study, which included two teachers, 57 students from three secondary schools, two band schools, and two secondary schools, is
supported by the research. This study has demonstrated the suitability of flipped classroom instruction for the instruction of English
grammar. Students in the experimental group showed an overall favorable opinion toward the flipped classroom.
When Basal applied this strategy in 2012 to improve advanced reading and writing abilities, students from the University of Yldz's Faculty
of Foreign Languages provided favorable feedback. In a study, Umutlu (2016) used a flipped classroom model of English composition
lessons at the State Preparatory University to examine different modalities of video. Because of this, the six individuals in the experimental
group's written performance outperformed that of the control group.
Students found the flipped classroom more innovative, encouraging, and creative. As students had already read and watched the videos
related to topic sentences, supporting sentences, concluding sentences, adjectives, adverbs, and sentence structure, they liked this procedure
of teaching as it was something new and exciting for them. Resultantly, they improved their writing skills. The study concurs with Haghighi
et al. (2019) that demonstrate that teachers using the innovative techniques of the Flip Classroom motivates students to invest more time and
Published by Sciedu Press                                      472                                      ISSN 1925-0703     E-ISSN 1925-0711
http://wjel.sciedupress.com                          World Journal of English Language                                 Vol. 13, No. 5; 2023
effort in their writing classrooms and improve their writing skills.
The study supported the flip classroom's positive effects on education in the EFL environment, with a number of educational repercussions.
At first, using flip classrooms to teach EFL writing is a good idea. Students' writing performance seemed to benefit from the use of flip
classrooms in writing classes because it seems to boost motivation and enhance the learning environment (Alghasab, 2020).
6. Conclusion and Recommendation
The researcher deduces from this finding that the flipped classroom approach enhanced the writing abilities of EFL students. Blended
learning as part of flipped classroom method can be attributed to this result. Dramatic improvement in the performance of students testifies
to the method's suitability in an EFL setting. It is also recommended to conduct further research to examine how the flip-classroom approach
affects other forms of EFL writing, such as writing for blogs, magazines, and emails.
Acknowledgments
This research is financed by the Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia and the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University under
the eleventh research phase grant code no NU/NAR/SEHRC/11/8
References
Abdullah, M. Y., Hussin, S., & Ismail, K. (2019). Implementation of Flipped Classroom Model and Its Effectiveness on English Speaking
    Performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(9), 130.
    https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i09.10348
Adnan, M. (2017). Perceptions of senior-year ELT students for the flipped classroom: A Materials Development Course. Computer Assisted
    Language Learning, 30(3-4), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1301958
Albert, M., & Beatty, B. J. (2014). Flipping the classroom applications to curriculum redesign for an introduction to management course:
    Impact on grades. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 419-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2014.929559
Alghasab, M. B. (2020). Flipping the Writing Classroom: Focusing on the Pedagogical Benefits and EFL Learners‘ Perceptions. English
    Language Teaching, 13(4), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p28
Al-Harbi, S. S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2016). The Flipped Classroom Impact in Grammar Class on EFL Saudi Secondary School Students‘
    Performances and Attitudes. English Language Teaching, 9(10). 60-80. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n10p60
Amiryousefi, M. (2017). The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners' L2 speaking, L2 listening
    & engagement. Innovation in Language Learning & Teaching, 13(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1394307
Başal, A. (2012, November 15-17). The use of flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. in Proceedings of the 3rd Black Sea ELT
    Conference Technology: A Bridge to Language Learning. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/6y3mzdrk
Bernmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Teaching Theology & Religion, 17(1),
    82-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12165
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Publication, Inc.
Demirel, C. M. G. (2017). Exploring the flipped classroom: Possibilities and limitations (Unpublished master‘s thesis). University of
   Lisbon, Portugal.
Doman, E., & Webb., M. (2017). The flipped experience for Chinese university students studying English as a foreign language. TESOL
   Journal, 8(1), 102-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.264
Ekmekci, E. (2017). The flipped writing classroom in Turkish EFL context: a comparative study on a new model. Turkish Online Journal of
   Distance Education, 18(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.306566
Fulton, K. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400205
Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Impact of the flipped classroom on EFL learners' appropriate use of
    refusal: achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261-293.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature
   review titled A Review of Flipped Learning. Flipped Learning Network, Pearson, George Mason University. Retrieved from
   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339339697_A_WHITE_PAPER_BASED_ON_THE_LITERATURE_REVIEW_TITLED_
   A_REVIEW_OF_FLIPPED_LEARNING
Huynh, T., & Nguyen, U. (2019). Students' perceptions & design considerations of flipped interpreting classroom. Theory & Practice in
    Language Studies, 9(9), 1100-1110. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.05
Iyitoğlu, O., & Erişen, Y. (2017). Delving Into Flipping Efl Classroom: A Mixed Method Study. European Journal of English Language
     Teaching, 3(1). Retrieved from https://www.oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/1178
Published by Sciedu Press                                      473                                   ISSN 1925-0703     E-ISSN 1925-0711
http://wjel.sciedupress.com                           World Journal of English Language                                    Vol. 13, No. 5; 2023
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Long-Term Working Memory in Text Production. Memory & Cognition, 29(1), 43-52.
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195739
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a Little Help From Your Students: A New Model for Faculty
    Development and Online Course Design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55. Retrieved from
    http://www.matt-koehler.com/publications/Koehler_et_al_2004.pdf
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The
    Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338
Qader, R. Q., & Arslan, F. Y. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom instruction in writing: a case study with Iraqi EFL learners. Teaching
    English with Technology, 19(1), 36-55. https://tewtjournal.org/volume-2019/issue-1/.
Rahman, S. F., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2019). An Overview of Flipped Learning Studies in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal,
    10(4), 194-203. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no4.15
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, A. W. (2002). Teaching writing. In J. C. Richards & A. W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language
    teaching: An anthology of current practice, 303-305. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190.042
Seljan, S., Banek M., Špiranec, S., & Lasić-Lazić, J. (2006). CALL (Computer-Assisted Language Learning) and Distance Learning. In P.
     Biljanović & K. Skala (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Convention. (pp. 145–150). Opatija Croatia. Retrieved from
     https://www.bib.irb.hr/251411/download/251411.CALLDL_Seljan.pdf
Shih, H. C. J., & Huang, S. C. (2020). College students‘ metacognitive strategy use in an EFL flipped classroom. Computer Assisted
     Language Learning, 33(7), 755-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1590420
Soltanpour, F. & Valizadeh, M. (2018). A flipped writing classroom: Effects on EFL learners‘ argumentative essays. Advances in Language
     and Literary Studies, 9(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.5
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from
    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535180.pdf
Triantafyllou, E., & Timcenko, O. (2014). Introducing a flipped classroom for a statistics course: A Case study. In Proceedings of 25th
     Annual Conference European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE) (pp. 5-8).
     https://doi.org/10.1109/EAEEIE.2014.6879373
Umutlu, D. (2017). Effects of different video modalities in flipped English writing classes on students‘ writing scores. New Trends and
   Issues Proceedings On Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(7), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i7.1986
Wang, Y., & Qi, G. Y. (2018). Mastery-based language learning outside class: Learning support in flipped classrooms. Language Learning
   & Technology, 22(2), 50-74. Retrieved from
   https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44641/1/22_02_wangqi_10125_44641.pdf
Wells, P., de Lange, P. A., & Fieger, P. (2008). Integrating a virtual Learning Environment into a Second-Year Accounting Course:
    Determinants of Overall Student Perception. Accounting & Finance, 48(3), 503-518.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00249.x
Yang, C. C. R. (2017). An Investigation of the Use of the ‗Flipped Classroom‘ Pedagogy in Secondary English Language Classrooms.
    Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.28945/3635
Yang, J., Yin, C. X., & Wang, W. (2018). Flipping the classroom in teaching Chinese as a foreign language. Language Learning &
    Technology, 22(1), 16-26. Retrieved from https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44575/1/22_01_yangyinwang.pdf
Yu, Z., & Wang, G. (2016). Academic Achievements and Satisfaction of the Clicker-Aided Flipped Business English Writing Class.
    Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 298-312.
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Published by Sciedu Press                                        474                                      ISSN 1925-0703   E-ISSN 1925-0711