0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views8 pages

Ssalg

The document discusses semisimple algebras and rings, providing definitions, propositions, and exercises related to semisimple and simple rings. It establishes key properties such as the radical of a semisimple ring being zero and the structure of semisimple rings as finite direct products of simple rings. Additionally, it covers central simple algebras over fields, including their properties, relationships with division algebras, and theorems regarding their structure and centralizers.

Uploaded by

alamutric88
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views8 pages

Ssalg

The document discusses semisimple algebras and rings, providing definitions, propositions, and exercises related to semisimple and simple rings. It establishes key properties such as the radical of a semisimple ring being zero and the structure of semisimple rings as finite direct products of simple rings. Additionally, it covers central simple algebras over fields, including their properties, relationships with division algebras, and theorems regarding their structure and centralizers.

Uploaded by

alamutric88
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Notes on semisimple algebras

§1. Semisimple rings


(1.1) Definition A ring R with 1 is semisimple, or left semisimple to be precise, if the free
left R-module underlying R is a sum of simple R-module.

(1.2) Definition A ring R with 1 is simple, or left simple to be precise, if R is semisimple


and any two simple left ideals (i.e. any two simple left submodules of R) are isomorphic.

(1.3) Proposition A ring R is semisimple if and only if there exists a ring S and a semisim-
ple S-module M of finite length such that R ∼
= EndS (M )

(1.4) Corollary Every semisimple ring is Artinian.

(1.5) Proposition
Qs Let R be a semisimple ring. Then R is isomorphic to a finite direct
product i=1 Ri , where each Ri is a simple ring.

(1.6) Proposition Let R be a simple ring. Then there exists a division ring D and a positive
integer n such that R ∼
= Mn (D).

(1.7) Definition Let R be a ring with 1. Define the radical of R to be the intersection of
all maximal left ideals of R. The above definitions uses left R-modules. When we want to
emphasize that, we say that n is the left radical of R.

(1.8) Proposition The radical of a semisimple ring is zero.

(1.9) Proposition Let R be a simple ring. Then R has no non-trivial two-sided ideals, and
its radical is zero.

(1.10) Proposition Let R be an Artinian ring whose radical is zero. Then R is semisimple.
In particular, if R has no non-trivial two-sided ideal, then R is simple.

(1.11) Remark In non-commutative ring theory, the standard definition for a ring to be
semisimple is that its radical is zero. This definition is different from Definition 1.1, For
instance, Z is not a semisimple ring in the sense of Def. 1.1, while the radical of Z is zero. In
fact the converse of Prop. 1.10 holds; see Cor. 1.4 below.

(1.12) Exercise. Let R be a ring with 1. Let n be the radical of R

(i) Show that there exists a maximal left ideal in R. Deduce that the radical of R is a
proper left ideal of R. (Hint: Use Zorn’s Lemma.)

(ii) Show that n · M = (0) for every simple left R-module M . (Hint: Show that for every
0 6= x ∈ M , the set of all elements y ∈ R such that y · x = 0 is a maximal left ideal of
R.)

(iv) Suppose that I is a left ideal of R such that I · M = (0) for every simple left R-module
M . Prove that I ⊆ n.

1
(v) Show that n is a two-sided ideal of R. (Hint: Use (iv).)

(vi) Let I be a left ideal of R such that I n = (0) for some positive integer n. Show that
I ⊆ n.

(vi) Show that the radical of R/n is zero.

(1.13) Exercise. Let R be a ring with 1 and let n be the (left) radical of R.

(i) Let x ∈ n. Show that R · (1 + x) = R, i.e. there exists an element z ∈ R such that
z · (1 + x) = 1.

(ii) Suppose that J is a left ideal of R such that R · (1 + x) = R for every x ∈ J. Show that
J ⊆ n. (Hint: If not, then there exists a maximal left ideal m of R such that J + m 3 1.)

(iii) Let x ∈ n, and let z be an element of R such that z · (1 + x) = 1. Show that z − 1 ∈ n.


Conclude that 1 + n ⊂ R× .

(iv) Show that the n is equal to the right radical of R. (Hint: Use the analogue of (i)–(iii)
for the right radical.)

§2. Simple algebras


(2.1) Proposition Let K be a field. Let A be a central simple algebra over K, and let B be
simple K-algebra. Then A ⊗K B is a simple K-algebra. Moreover Z(A ⊗K B) = Z(B), i.e.
every element of the center of A ⊗K B has the form 1 ⊗ b for a unique element b ∈ Z(B). In
particular, A ⊗K B is a central simple algebra over K if both A and B are.
Proof. We assume for simplicity of exposition that dimK (B) < ∞; the proof works for the
infinite dimensional case as well. Let b1 , . . . , br be a K-basis of B. Define the length of an
element x = ri=1 ai ⊗ bi ∈ A ⊗ B, ai ∈ A for i = 1, . . . , r, to be Card{i | ai 6= 0}.
P

Let I be a non-zero ideal in A ⊗K B. Let x be a non-zero element of I of minimal length.


After relabelling the bi ’s, we may and do assume that x has the form
r
X
x = 1 ⊗ b1 + ai .
i=2

Consider the element [a ⊗ 1, x] ∈ I with a ∈ A, whose length is less than the length of x.
Therefore [a ⊗ 1, x] = 0 for all a ∈ A, i.e. [a, ai ] = 0 for all a ∈ A and all i = 2, . . . , r. In
other words, ai ∈ K for all i = 2, . . . , r. Write ai = λi ∈ K, and x = 1 ⊗ b ∈ I, where
b = b1 + λ2 b2 + · · · λr br ∈ B, b 6= 0. So 1 ⊗ BbB ⊆ I. Since B is simple, we have BbB = B
and hence I = A ⊗K B. We have shown that A ⊗K B is simple.
Let x = ni=1 ai ⊗ bi be any element of Z(A ⊗K B), with a1 , . . . , ar ∈ A. We have
P

r
X
0 = [a ⊗ 1, x] = [a, ai ] ⊗ bi
i=1

for all a ∈ A. Hence ai ∈ Z(A) = K for each i = 1, . . . , r, and x = 1 ⊗ b for some b ∈ B. The
condition that 0 = [1 ⊗ y, x] for all y ∈ B implies that b ∈ Z(B) and hence x ∈ 1 ⊗ Z(B).

2
(2.2) Corollary Let A be a finite dimensional algebra over a field K, and let n = dimK (A).
If A is a central simple algebra over K, then

→ EndK (A) ∼
A ⊗K Aopp − = Mn (K) .

Conversely, if A ⊗K Aopp  EndK (A), then A is a central simple algebra over K.

Proof. Suppose that A is a central simple algebra over K. By Prop. 2.1, A ⊗K Aopp is a
central simple algebra over K. Consider the map

α : A ⊗K Aopp → EndK (A)

which sends x ⊗ y to the element u 7→ xuy ∈ EndK (A). The source of α is simple by Prop.
2.1, so α is injective because it is clearly non-trivial. Hence it is an isomorphism because the
source and the target have the same dimension over K.
Conversely, suppose that A ⊗K Aopp  EndK (A) and I is a proper ideal of A. Then the
image of I ⊗ Aopp in EndK (A) is an ideal of EndK (A) which does not contain IdA . so A
is a simple K-algebra. Let L := Z(A), then the image of the canonical map A ⊗K Aopp in
EndK (A) lies in the subalgebra EndL (A), hence L = K.

(2.3) Lemma Let D be a finite dimensional central division algebra over an algebraically
closed field K. Then D = K.

(2.4) Corollary The dimension of any central simple algebra over a field is a perfect square.

(2.5) Lemma Let A be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over a field K. Let F ⊂ A
be an overfield of K contained in A. Then [F : K] | [A : K]1/2 . In particular if [F : K]2 =
[A : K], then F is a maximal subfield of A.
Proof. Write [A : K] = n2 , [F : K] = d. Multiplication on the left defines an embedding
A ⊗K F ,→ EndF (A). By Lemma 3.1, n2 = [A⊗K : F ] divides [EndF (A) : F ] = (n2 /d)2 , i.e.
d2 | n2 . So d divides n.

(2.6) Lemma Let A be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over a field K. If F is a
subfield of A containing K, and [F : K]2 = [A : K], then F is a maximal subfield of K and
A ⊗K F ∼ = Mn (F ), where n = [A : K]1/2 .
Proof. We have seen in Lemma 2.5 that F is a maximal subfield of A. Consider the natural
map α : A ⊗K F → EndK (A), which is injective because A ⊗K F is simple and α is non-
trivial. Since the dimension of the source and the target of α are both equal to n2 , α is an
isomorphism.

(2.7) Proposition Let A be a central simple algebra over a field K. Then there exists a
finite separable field extension F/K such that A ⊗K F ∼
= Mn (F ), where n = [A : K]1/2 .

3
Proof. It suffices to show that A ⊗K K sep ∼ = Mn (K sep ). Changing notation, we may assume
that K = K . By Wedderburn’s theorem, we know that A ∼
sep
= Mm (D), where D is a central
division algebra over K = K sep . Write n = md and [D : K] = d2 , d ∈ N. Suppose that
D 6= K, i.e. d > 1. Then char(K) = p > 0, and every element of D is purely inseparable
over K. There exists a power q of p such that xq ∈ K for every element x ∈ D. Then for
the central simple algebra B := D ⊗K K alg ∼ = Mn (K alg ), we have y q ∈ K alg for every element
y∈B∼ = Md (K alg ). The last statement is clearly false, since d > 1.

(2.8) Theorem (Noether-Skolem) Let B be a finite dimensional central simple algebra



over a field K. Let A1 , A2 be simple K-subalgebras of B. Let φ : A1 −→ A2 be a K-linear
isomorphism of K-algebras. Then there exists an element x ∈ B × such that φ(y) = x−1 yx for
all y ∈ A1 .
Proof. Consider the simple K-algebra R := B ⊗K Aopp 1 , and two R-module structures on the
K-vector space V underlying B: an element u ⊗ a with u ∈ B and a ∈ Aopp 1 operates either
as b 7→ uba for all b ∈ V , or as b 7→ ubφ(a) for all b ∈ V . Hence there exists a ψ ∈ GLK (V )
such that
ψ(uba) = uψ(b)φ(a)
for all u, b ∈ B and all a ∈ A1 . One checks easily that ψ(1) ∈ B × : if u ∈ B and u · ψ(1) = 0,
then ψ(u) = 0, hence u = 0. Then φ(a) = ψ(1)−1 · a · ψ(1) for every a ∈ A1 .

(2.9) Theorem Let B be a K-algebra and let A be a finite dimensional central simple K-
subalgebra of B. Then the natural homomorphism α : A ⊗K ZB (A) → B is an isomorphism.
Proof. Passing from K to K alg , we may and do assume that A ∼
= Mn (K), and we fix an

isomorphism A −
→ Mn (K).
First we show that α is surjective. Given an element b ∈ B, define elements bij ∈ B for
1 ≤ i, j ≤ n by
n
X
bij := eki b ejk ,
k=1

where eki ∈ Mn (K) is the n × n matrix whose (k, i)-entry is equal to 1 and all other entries
equal to 0. One checks that each bij commutes with all elements of A = Mn (K). The following
computation
Xn X X
bij eij = eki b ejk eij = eii b ejj = b
i,j=1 i,j,k i,j

shows that α is surjective.


Suppose that 0 = ni,j=1 bij eij , bij ∈ ZB (A) for all 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n. Then
P

 
n
X X n
X
0= ekl  bij eij  emk = blm ekk = blm
k=1 i,j k=1

for all 0 ≤ l, m ≤ n. Hence α is injective.

4
(2.10) Theorem Let B be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over a field K, and let
A be a simple K-subalgebra of B. Then ZB (A) is simple, and ZB (ZB (A)) = A.
Proof. Let C = EndK (A) ∼ = Mn (K), where n = [A : K]. Inside the central simple K-algebra
B ⊗K C we have two simple K-subalgebras, A ⊗K K and K ⊗K A. Here the right factor of
K ⊗K A is the image of A in C = EndK (A) under left multiplication. Clearly these two simple
K-subalgebras of B ⊗K C are isomorphic, since both are isomorphic to A as a K-algebra.
By Noether-Skolem, these two subalgebras are conjugate in B ⊗K C by a suitable element of
(B ⊗K C)× , therefore their centralizers (resp. double centralizers) in B ⊗K C are conjugate,
hence isomorphic.
Let’s compute the centralizers first:

ZB⊗K C (A ⊗K K) = ZB (A) ⊗K C ,

while
ZB⊗K C (K ⊗K A) = B ⊗K Aopp .
Since B ⊗K Aopp is central simple over K, so is ZB (A) ⊗K C. Hence ZB (A) is simple.
We compute the double centralizers:

ZB⊗K C (ZB⊗K C (A ⊗K K)) = ZB⊗K C (ZB (A) ⊗K C) = ZB (ZB (A) ⊗K K ,

while
ZB⊗K C (ZB⊗K C (K ⊗K A)) = ZB⊗K C (B ⊗K Aopp ) = K ⊗K A
So ZB (ZB (A)) is isomorphic to A as K-algebras. Since A ⊆ ZB (ZB (A)), the inclusion is an
equality.

§3. Some invariants


(3.1) Lemma Let K be a field and let A be a finite dimensional simple K-algebra. Let M
be an (A, A)-bimodule. Then M is free as a left A-module.

(3.2) Definition Let K be a field, B be a K-algebra, and let A be a finite dimensional


simple K-subalgebra of B. Then B is a free left A-module by Lemma 3.1. We define the
rank of B over A, denoted [B : A], to be the rank of B as a free left A-module. Clearly
[B : A] = dimK (B)/dimK (A) if dimK (A) < ∞.

(3.3) Definition Let K be a field. Let B be a finite dimensional simple K-algebra, and let
A be a simple K-subalgebra of A. Let N be a left simple B-module, and let M be a left simple
A-module.
(i) Define i(B, A) := lengthB (B ⊗A M ), called the index of A in B.

(ii) Define h(B, A) := lengthA (N ), called the height of B over A.


Recall that [B : A] is the A-rank of Bs , where Bs is the free left A-module underlying B.

(3.4) Lemma Notation as in Def. 3.3.


(i) lengthB (B ⊗A U ) = i(B, A) lengthA (U ) for every left A-module U .

5
(ii) lengthA (V ) = h(B, A) · lengthB (V ) for every left B-module V .

(iii) lengthB (Bs ) = i(B, A) · lengthA (As ).

(iv) lengthA (B ⊗A U ) = [B : A] · lengthA (U )

(v) [B : A] = h(B, A) · i(B, A)

Proof. Statement (iii) follows from (iv) and the fact that Bs ∼
= B ⊗A As . To show (v), we
apply (i) a simple A-module M and get

[B : A] = lengthA (B ⊗A M ) = h(B, A) lengthB (B ⊗A M ) = h(B, A) i(B, A) .

Another proof of (iv) is to use the A-module As instead of a simple A-module M :

[B : A] lengthA (As ) = lengthA (Bs ) = lengthB (Bs ) h(B, A) = h(B, A) i(B, A) lengthA (As ) .

The last equality follows from (iii).

(3.5) Lemma Let A ⊂ B ⊂ C be inclusion of simple algebras over a field K. Then i(C, A) =
i(C, B) · i(B, A), h(C, A) = h(C, B) · h(B, A), and [C : A] = [C : B] · [B : A].

(3.6) Lemma Let K be an algebraically closed field. Let B be a finite dimensional simple
K-algebra, and let A be a semisimple K-subalgebra of B. Let M be a simple A-module, and
let N be a simple B-module.

(i) N contains M as a left A-module.

(ii) The following equalities hold.

dimK (HomB (B ⊗A M, N )) = dimK (HomA (M, N )) = dimK (HomA (N, M ))


= dimK (HomB (N, HomA (B, M )))

(iii) Assume in addition that A is simple. Then i(B, A) = h(B, A).

Proof. Statements (i), (ii) are easy and left as exercises. The statement (iii) follows from
the first equality in (ii).

(3.7) Lemma Let A be a simple algebra over a field K. Let M be a non-trivial finitely
generated left A-module, and let A0 := EndA (M ). Then lengthA (M ) = lengthA0 (A0s ), where
A0s is the left A0s -module underlying A0 .
Proof. Write M ∼ = U n , where U is a simple A-module. Then A0 ∼ = Mn (D), where D :=
0
EndA (U ) is a division algebra. So lengthA0 (A s) = n = lengthA (M ).

6
(3.8) Proposition Let K be a field, B be a finite dimensional simple K-algebra, and let A
be a simple K-subalgebra of B. Let N be a non-trivial B-module. Then

(i) A0 := EndA (N ) is a simple K-algebra, and B 0 := EndB (N ) is a simple K-subalgebra of


A0 .

(ii) i(A0 , B 0 ) = h(B, A), and h(A0 , B 0 ) = i(B, A).

Proof. The statement (i) is easy and omitted. To prove (ii), we have

lengthA (N ) = lengthA0 (A0 s) = i(A0 , B 0 ) lengthB 0 (B 0 s) ,

where the first equality follows from Lemma 3.7 and the second equality follows from Lemma
3.4 (iii). We also have

lengthA (N ) = h(B, A) lengthA (N ) = h(B, A) lengthB 0 (Bs0 )

where the last equality follows from Lemma 3.7. So we get i(A0 , B 0 ) = h(B, A). Replacing
(B, A) by (A0 , B 0 ), we get i(B, A) = h(A0 , B 0 ).

§4. Centralizers
(4.1) Theorem Let K be a field. Let B be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over
K. Let A be a simple K-subalgebra of B, and let A0 := ZB (A). Let L = Z(A) = Z(A0 ). Then
the following holds.

(i) A0 is a simple K-algebra.

(ii) A := ZB (ZB (A)).

(iii) [B : A0 ] = [A : K], [B : A] = [A0 : K], [B : K] = [A : K] · [A0 : K].

(iv) A and A0 are linearly disjoint over L.



(v) If A is a central simple algebras over K, then A ⊗ A0 −
→ B.

Proof. Let N be a simple B-module. Let D := EndB (V ). We have D ⊆ EndK (N ) ⊇ B,



and Z(D) = Z(B) = K. So D ⊗K A is a simple K-algebra, and we have D ⊗K A − →D·A⊆
EndK (N ) =: C, where D · A is the subalgebra of EndK (N ) generated by D and A. So

ZC (D · A) = ZC (D) ∩ ZC (A) = B ∩ ZC (A) = A0 .

Hence A0 = EndD·A (N ) is simple, because D · A) is simple. We have proved (i).


Apply Prop. 3.8 (ii) to the pair (D · A, D) and the D · A-module N . We get

[A : K] = [D · A : D] = [B : A0 ]

since ZC (D) = B. On the other hand, we have

[B : A] · [A : K] = [B : K] = [B : A0 ] · [A0 : K] = [A : K] · [A0 : K]

so [B : A] = [A0 : K]. We have proved (iii).

7
Apply (i) and (iii) to the simple K-subalgebra A0 ⊆ B, we see that A ⊂ ZB (A0 ) and
[A : K] = [A0 : K], so A = ZB (ZB (A)). We have proved (ii).
Let L := A ∩ A0 = Z(A) ⊆ Z(A0 ) = Z(A). The last equality follows from (i). The tensor
product A ⊗L A0 is a central simple algebra over L since A and A0 are central simple over L.
So the canonical homomorphism A ⊗L A0 → B is an injection. We have prove (iv). The above
inclusion is an equality if and only if L = K, because dimL (B) = [L : K] · [A : L] · [A0 : L].

Remark (1) Statements (i) and (ii) of Thm. 4.1 is the content of Thm. 2.10. The proof
in 2.10 uses Noether-Skolem and the fact that the double centralizer of any K-algebra A in
EndK (A) is equal to itself. The proof in 4.1 relies on Prop. 3.8.
(2) Statement (v) of Thm. 4.1 is a special case of Thm. 2.9.

(4.2) Corollary Let A be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over a field K, and let
F be a subfield of A which contains K. Then F is a maximal subfield of A if and only if
[F : K]2 = [A : K].
Proof. Immediate from Thm. 4.1 (iii).

(4.3) Proposition Let A be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over K. Let F be an
extension field of K such that [F : K] = n := [A : K]1/2 . Then there exists a K-linear ring
homomorphism F ,→ A if and only if A ⊗K F ∼ = Mn (F ).
Proof. The “only if” part is contained in Lemma 2.6. It remains to show the “if” part.
Suppse that A ⊗K F ∼ = Mn (F ). Choose a K-linear embedding α : F ,→ Mn (K). The central
simple algebra B := A ⊗K Mn (K) over K contains C1 := A ⊗K α(F ) as a subalgebra, whose
centralizer in B is K ⊗K α(F ). Since C1 ∼
= Mn (F ) by assumption, C1 contains a subalgebra
C2 which is isomorphic to Mn (K). By Noether-Skolem, ZB (C2 ) is isomorphic to A over K.
So we get F ∼ = ZB (C1 ) ⊂ ZB (C2 ) ∼
= A.

(4.4) Theorem Let K be a field and let B be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over
K. Let N be a non-trivial B-module of finite length. Let A be a simple K-subalgebra of B.
Let A0 := ZB (A) be the centralizer of A in B. Then we have a natural isomorphism

EndB (N ) ⊗K A0 −
→ EndA (N ) .
Proof. We know that A0 is a simple K-algebra, and R := EndB (N ) is a central simple K-
algebra. So R ⊗K A0 is a simple K-algebra. Let C be the image of R ⊗K A0 in EndA (N );

clearly we have R ⊗K A0 −
→ C. Let S := EndK (N ). Let C 0 := EndC (N ). We have
C 0 = EndR (N ) ∩ EndA0 (N ) = B ∩ ZS (A0 ) = ZB (A0 ) = A ;
the second and the fourth equality follows from the double centralizer theorem. Hence C =
EndA (N ), again by the double centralizer theorem.

(4.5) Corollary Notation as in Prop. 4.4. Let L := Z(A) = Z(A0 ). Then [A ⊗L ZB (A)] and
[B ⊗K L] are equal as elements of Br(L).
Proof. Take N = B, the left regular representation of B, in Thm. 4.4.

You might also like