Chapter 17 Absorption Costing
Chapter 17 Absorption Costing
A. Yes No Yes
C. No Yes No
D. No No Yes
E. No No No
Direct labor 18
A. $35.
B. $55.
C. $65.
D. $84.
Direct labor 27
A. $75.
B. $107.
C. $116.
D. $133.
E. some other amount.
Answer: B LO: 1 Type: A
10. Santa Fe Corporation has computed the following unit costs for the year just ended:
Direct material used $25
Direct labor 19
Which of the following choices correctly depicts the per-unit cost of inventory
under variable costing and absorption costing?
Variable Absorption
Costing Costing
A
$79 $119
.
B
$79 $151
.
C
$96 $119
.
D
$96 $151
.
Which of the following choices correctly depicts the per-unit cost of inventory
under variable costing and absorption costing?
A. Variable, $85; absorption, $105.
B. Variable, $85; absorption, $116.
C. Variable, $103; absorption, $105.
D. Variable, $103; absorption, $116.
$280,00
Direct materials used
0
12. If Indiana uses variable costing, the total inventoriable costs for the year would be:
A. $400,000.
B. $460,000.
C. $560,000.
D. $620,000.
E. $660,000.
Answer: C LO: 1 Type: A
13. The per-unit inventoriable cost under absorption costing is:
A. $9.50.
B. $25.00.
C. $28.00.
D. $33.00.
E. $40.50.
Answer: D LO: 1 Type: A
14. Consider the following comments about absorption-and variable-costing income
statements:
I. A variable-costing income statement discloses a firm's contribution margin.
II. Cost of goods sold on an absorption-costing income statement includes fixed costs.
III. The amount of variable selling and administrative cost is the same on absorption-and
variable-costing income statements.
Which of the above statements is (are) true?
A. I only.
B. II only.
C. I and II.
D. II and III.
E. I, II, and III.
Answer: E LO: 2, 3 Type: N
15. Roberts, which began business at the start of the current year, had the following data:
Planned and actual production: 40,000 units Sales: 37,000 units at $15 per unit Production costs:
The gross margin that the company would disclose on an absorption-costing income statement is:
A. $97,500.
B. $147,000.
C. $166,500.
D. $370,000.
E. some other amount.
Answer: C LO: 2 Type: A
16. McAfee, which began business at the start of the current year, had the following data:
Planned and actual production: 40,000 units Sales: 37,000 units at $15 per unit
Production costs:
Variable: $4 per unit Fixed: $260,000
The contribution margin that the company would disclose on an absorption-costing income
statement is:
A. $0.
B. $147,000.
C. $166,500.
D. $370,000.
E. some other amount.
Answer: A LO: 2 Type: A
17. Chicago began business at the start of the current year. The company planned to produce
25,000 units, and actual production conformed to expectations. Sales totaled 22,000 units at $30
each. Costs incurred were:
Fixed manufacturing overhead $150,000
The contribution margin that the company would disclose on a variable-costing income
statement is:
A. $97,500.
B. $147,000.
C. $166,500.
D. $370,000.
E. some other amount.
Answer: D LO: 3 Type: A
19. Madison began business at the start of the current year. The company planned to produce
30,000 units, and actual production conformed to expectations. Sales totaled 28,000 units at $32
each. Costs incurred were:
Fixed manufacturing overhead $150,000
I. Yearly income reported under absorption costing will differ from income reported under
variable costing if production and sales volumes differ.
II. Long-run, total income reported under absorption costing will often be close to that
reported under variable costing.
III. Differences in income under absorption and variable costing can often be reconciled by
multiplying the change in inventory (in units) by the variable manufacturing overhead cost per
unit.
Which of the above statements is (are) true?
A. I only.
B. II only.
C. III only.
D. I and II.
E. II and III.
Answer: D LO: 4 Type: RC
28. Which of the following formulas can often reconcile the difference between absorption-
and variable-costing net income?
A. Change in inventory units x predetermined variable-overhead rate per unit.
B. Change in inventory units ÷ predetermined variable-overhead rate per unit.
C. Change in inventory units x predetermined fixed-overhead rate per unit.
D. Change in inventory units ÷ predetermined fixed-overhead rate per unit.
E. (Absorption-costing net income -variable-costing net income) x fixed-overhead rate per
unit.
Answer: C LO: 4 Type: RC
29. Monex reported $65,000 of net income for the year by using absorption costing. The
company had no beginning inventory, planned and actual production of 20,000 units, and sales
of 18,000 units. Standard variable manufacturing costs were $20 per unit, and total budgeted
fixed manufacturing overhead was $100,000. If there were no variances, net income under
variable costing would be:
A. $15,000.
B. $55,000.
C. $65,000.
D. $75,000.
E. $115,000.
Answer: B LO: 4 Type: A
30. Canyon reported $106,000 of net income for the year by using variable costing. The
company had no beginning inventory, planned and actual production of 50,000 units, and sales
of 47,000 units. Standard variable manufacturing costs were $15 per unit, and total budgeted
fixed manufacturing overhead was $150,000. If there were no variances, net income under
absorption costing would be:
A. $52,000.
B. $97,000.
C. $106,000.
D. $115,000.
E. $160,000.
Answer: D LO: 4 Type: A
31. Consider the following statements about absorption costing and variable costing:
I. Variable costing is consistent with contribution reporting and cost-volume-profit analysis.
II. Absorption costing must be used for external financial reporting.
III. A number of companies use both absorption costing and variable costing.
Which of the above statements is (are) true?
A. I only.
B. II only.
C. III only.
D. I and II.
If Highline uses throughput costing and had sales revenues for the period of
$950,000, which of the following choices correctly depicts the company's
cost of goods sold and net income?
A $180,00
$45,000
. 0
B $180,00 $645,00
. 0 0
C $305,00
$45,000
. 0
D $305,00 $645,00
. 0 0
EXERCISES
Characteristics of Absorption Costing and Variable Costing
40. Consider the statements that follow.
1. Variable selling costs are expensed when incurred.
2. The income statement discloses a company’s contribution margin.
3. Fixed manufacturing overhead is attached to each unit produced.
4. Direct labor becomes part of a unit’s cost.
5. Sales revenue minus cost of goods sold equals contribution margin.
6. This method must be used for external financial reporting.
7. Fixed selling and administrative expenses are treated in the same manner as fixed
manufacturing overhead.
8. This method is sometimes called full costing.
9. This method requires the calculation of a fixed manufacturing cost per unit.
Required: Determine which of the nine statements:
A. 3, 6, 8, 9
B. 2, 7
C. 1, 4
D. 5
Required:
A. Assuming the use of variable costing, compute the inventoriable costs for the month.
B. Compute the month's inventoriable costs by using absorption costing.
C. Assume that anticipated and actual production totaled 20,000 units, and that 18,000 units
were sold during May. Determine the amount of fixed manufacturing overhead and fixed selling
and administrative costs that would be expensed for the month under (1) variable costing and (2)
absorption costing.
D. Assume the same data as in requirement "C." Compute the contribution margin that would
be reported on a variable-costing income statement.
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: A
Answer:
Total $260,000
Total $360,000
2. Fixed manufacturing overhead: ($100,000 ÷ 20,000 units) x 18,000 units = $90,000 Fixed
selling and administrative costs: $60,000
D. Variable manufacturing costs: $150,000 + $80,000 + $30,000 = $260,000 Variable
manufacturing costs per unit: $260,000 ÷ 20,000 units = $13 Contribution margin: $625,000 -
[(18,000 x $13) + $51,000] = $340,000
Miscellaneous Calculations: Variable and
Absorption Costing
42. Sosa, Inc., began operations at the start of the current year, having a production target of
60,000 units. Actual production totaled 60,000 units, and the company sold 90% of its
manufacturing output at $55 per unit. The following costs were incurred:
Manufacturing:
Variable 120,000
Fixed 630,000
Required:
A. Assuming the use of variable costing, compute the cost of Sosa's ending finished-goods
inventory.
B. Compute the company's contribution margin. Would Sosa disclose the contribution
margin on a variable-costing income statement or an absorption-costing income statement?
C. Assuming the use of absorption costing, how much fixed selling and administrative cost
would Sosa include in the ending finished-goods inventory?
D. Compute the company's gross margin.
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: RC, A
Answer:
A. Variable production costs total $1,080,000 ($300,000 + $420,000 + $360,000), or $18 per
unit ($1,080,000 ÷ 60,000 units). Since 6,000 units remain in inventory [0 + 60,000 -(60,000 x
90%)], the ending finished goods totals $108,000 (6,000 x $18).
B. Sales revenue (60,000 units x 90% x $2,970,00
$55) 0
$972,00
(60,000 units x 90% x $18)
0
$1,458,00
Gross margin
0
The company met its original planned production target of 100,000 units.
There were no variances during the period, and the firm's selling price is $15
per unit.
Required:
A. What is the cost of Venture's end-of-period finished-goods inventory under the variable-
costing method?
B. Calculate the company's variable-costing net income.
C. Calculate the company's absorption-costing net income.
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: A
Answer:
A. Ending finished-goods inventory (units): 0 + 100,000 -90,000 = 10,000 Inventoriable
costs under variable costing:
Direct materials used $400,000
Total $720,000
Variable cost per unit produced: $720,000 ÷ 100,000 units = $7.20 per unit
Ending inventory: 10,000 units x $7.20 = $72,000
$1,350,00
B. Sales revenue (90,000 units x $15)
0
C. Predetermined fixed overhead rate: $250,000 ÷ 100,000 units = $2.50 Absorption cost per
unit: $7.20 + $2.50 = $9.70
$1,350,00
Sales revenue (90,000 units x $15)
0
Manufacturing costs:
Fixed $840,000
Fixed $925,000
$8,160,00
C. Sales revenue (170,000 units x $48)
0
$3,910,00
Contribution margin
0
$2,145,00
Net income
0
$8,160,00
D. Sales revenue (170,000 units x $48)
0
$4,386,00
Gross margin
0
$2,271,00
Net income
0
Balance-sheet data:
Kim achieved its planned production level for the year. The company's fixed
manufacturing overhead totaled $141,000, and the firm paid a 10%
commission based on gross sales dollars to its sales force.
Required:
A. How many units did Kim plan to produce during the year.
B. How much fixed manufacturing overhead did the company apply to each unit produced?
C. Compute Kim's cost of goods sold.
D. How much variable cost did the company attach to each unit manufactured?
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: A, N
Answer:
A. Sales (35,000 units) + ending finished-goods inventory (12,000 units) = production
(47,000 units). Note: There is no beginning finished-goods inventory.
B. Since planned and actual production figures are the same, Kim applied $3 to each unit
($141,000 ÷ 47,000 units).
C. Sales revenue $770,000
Cost of goods
$560,000
sold
D. Kim attached $13 to each unit. This figure can be derived by analyzing cost of goods sold:
Cost of goods sold $560,000
The same $13 figure can be obtained by studying the ending finished-good
inventory:
$156,00
Variable cost
0
B.
Answer:
A. The difference between absorption costing and variable costing lies in the treatment of
fixed manufacturing overhead. Under absorption costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is a
product cost and attached to each unit produced. In contrast, under variable costing, it is written
off (expensed) as a period cost.
B. Since the number of units sold equals the number of units produced, variable-and
absorption-income figures are the same: $110,000.
C. With sales of 7,500 units and production of 7,100 units, income computed under
absorption costing includes $16,000 (400 units x $40) of prior-period fixed manufacturing
overhead. Absorption income is therefore $162,000 ($178,000 -$16,000).
Reconciliation of Absorption-and Variable-Costing
Income
47. Beachcraft Corporation has fixed manufacturing cost of $12 per unit. Consider the three
independent cases that follow.
Case A: Absorption-and variable costing net income each totaled $240,000 in a period when
the firm produced 18,000 units.
Case C: Absorption-costing net income and variable-costing net income respectively totaled
$220,000 and $250,000 in a period when the beginning finished-goods inventory was 14,000
units.
Required:
A. In Case A, how many units were sold during the period?
B. In Case B, how much income would Beachcraft report under variable costing?
C. In Case C, how many units were in the ending finished-goods inventory?
LO: 4 Type: A
Answer:
A. Absorption-and variable costing income will be the same amount when inventory levels
are unchanged. Thus, sales totaled 18,000 units.
Conversion cost:
$1,570,00
Total
0
C. The total costs would be allocated between the current period's income statement and the
year-end inventory on the balance sheet. Thus:
Absorption costing: $1,570,000 -$142,500 = $1,427,500
Variable costing: $1,570,000 -$100,000 = $1,470,000 Throughput costing: $1,570,000 -$45,000
= $1,525,000
D. Throughput income: Sales revenue (17,500 units x $95) -$1,525,000 = $137,500
Throughput Costing
49. Krell Corporation, which uses throughput costing, began operations at the start of the
current year (20x1). Planned and actual production equaled 40,000 units, and sales totaled
35,000 units at $80 per unit. Cost data for 20x1 were as follows:
Direct materials (per unit) $ 20
Conversion cost:
Variable manufacturing
340,000
overhead
Fixed 220,000
A. Throughput costing is a technique that assigns only the unit-level spending amounts for
direct costs as the cost of products or services. In this case, direct materials is the only item that
qualifies as a throughput cost.
B. Ending inventory: 0 + 40,000 units -35,000 units = 5,000 units; 5,000 units x $20 =
$100,000
C. Krell Corporation Throughput-Costing Income Statement For the Year
Ended December 31, 20x1
C.
Outdoors Company Absorption-Costing Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31, 20xx
$330,00
Sales revenue (11,000 units x $30)
0
$110,00
Contribution margin
0
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Absorption Costing, Variable Costing, and Terminology
51. Absorption and variable costing are two different methods of measuring income and
costing inventory.
Required:
A. Product costs are defined as costs associated with the manufacturing process. How does
the operational definition of product cost differ between absorption costing and variable costing?
B. An absorption-costing income statement will report gross profit or gross margin whereas a
variable-costing income statement will report contribution margin. What is the difference
between these terms?
C. BoSan, Inc., has greatly modified its manufacturing process to reduce non-value-added
activities and has also adopted the just-in-time philosophy. As a result, the average finished-
goods inventory has dropped from six weeks' supply to eight business days' supply. In view of
these changes, will the difference in operating income between variable costing and absorption
costing be greater or less than in the past? Explain.
LO: 1, 2, 3, 6 Type: RC, N
Answer:
A. The sole difference between the two methods is that fixed manufacturing overhead costs
are defined as a product cost under absorption costing and as a period cost under variable
costing.
B. Gross profit (gross margin) is the difference between sales and cost of goods sold. Cost of
goods sold includes variable and fixed manufacturing costs. Contribution margin, on the other
hand, is the difference between sales and variable expenses, namely, variable cost of goods sold
and variable operating expenses. Fixed costs are ignored when calculating the contribution
margin.
C. These changes should reduce the differences in operating income between absorption
costing and variable costing. Inventories of work-in-process and finished goods are much smaller
than previously; thus, changes in inventories will be much less significant, which reduces
differences in income.
Reconciliation of Absorption-and Variable-Costing Income
52. The difference in net income between absorption and variable costing can be explained
by the change in finished-goods inventory (in units) multiplied by the standard fixed
manufacturing overhead rate.
Required: Explain why this calculation accounts for the difference noted.
LO: 4 Type: RC
Answer:
The only difference between the two methods is the treatment of fixed
manufacturing overhead. Such amounts are expensed under variable costing
whereas with absorption costing, a predetermined amount is attached to
each unit manufactured. This applied overhead moves back and forth
between the balance sheet and the income statement depending on what
happens to inventory during the period (i.e., increase or decrease). Because
of this situation, the change in inventory multiplied by the fixed
manufacturing overhead per unit corresponds with the difference in reported
income between absorption costing and variable costing.