Advanced Digital Communications
(EE5511)
MSc Module of Wireless Communication System
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 1/44 Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 1/45
MSc Module of Wireless Communication System
Dr. Qiang Ni
ECE, School of Eng & Design, Brunel University
E-mail: Qiang.Ni@brunel.ac.uk
Homepage: http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~eestqqn/
Office: Howell Building H237
Section 3 Section 3::
Wireless Channels and Channel 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 2/44
Wireless Channels and Channel 
Models (1)
Antenna and Radio Propagation
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 3/44
Antenna and Radio Propagation
Functionality of Antenna 
 The functionality of an antenna is to transform 
electromagnetic energy into electromagnetic waves
(transmission side) and to transform electromagnetic 
waves back into electromagnetic energy (reception). 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 4/44
waves back into electromagnetic energy (reception). 
 Question:
Should antenna preferably be erected as high and 
be as long as is possible or desirable?
Antenna Basics 
 In the following we only present two basic 
types of antennas used for radio 
propagation. 
 More knowledge, Recommend 2 Books:
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 5/44 Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University
 Antennas and Propagation for Wireless 
Communication Systems  by Simon R. Saunders  
Wiley, ISBN 10:0471986097(H/B)
 PRACTICAL ANTENNA HANDBOOK -
By Joseph Carr
Marconi Antenna (1) 
 The most basic antenna is called "a quarter-wave 
vertical (or called Marconi Antenna). 
 It is a quarter wavelength long and is a vertical 
radiator. Typical examples would be seen installed on 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 6/44
radiator. Typical examples would be seen installed on 
motor vehicles for two way communications.
 Technically Marconi antenna is an "isotropic 
radiator". This is a mythical antenna which radiates in 
all directions as does the light from a lamp bulb. 
 The quarter-wave vertical antenna is usually the 
simplest to construct and erect.
Marconi Antenna (2) 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 7/44
 The half-wave dipole antenna 
(or called Hertz Antenna) becomes 
quite common where space 
permits. It can be erected 
Hertz Antenna (1) 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 8/44
permits. It can be erected 
vertically but it is more often than 
not erected horizontally for 
practical reasons. 
 You will note that the 
up- and down hand 
halves are merely 
quarter wave sections.
Hertz Antenna (2) 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 9/44
quarter wave sections.
 The input impedance 
of this half-wave dipole 
example is nominally 75 
ohm. 
 Antenna Radiation Field
It is defined as the radiation that surrounds an antenna but 
doesnt collapse its field back into the antenna
 Near field and far field are two designators for antenna 
fields
 The far field region begins when the distance 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 10/44
The far field region begins when the distance 
where R = distance from the antenna (m)
D  = dimension of the antenna (m)
= wavelength of the transmitted signal (m)
 The near field will be any distance less than R
2
2D
R  >
 How to calculate the wavelength
 Definition: The distance travelled by the wave during a 
period of once cycle
is the velocity of the wave in meters per second and  is 
f
v
= 
v   f
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 11/44
is the velocity of the wave in meters per second and  is 
the frequency
 Example: Calculate the wavelength of a 100MHz signal 
travel in free space. Note that the velocity of 
electromagnetic waves in free space is 3x10
8
m/s.
m
f
v
3
10 1
10 3
8
8
=
= = 
v   f
 Example
Determine the distance from a parabolic reflector with 
diameter (D) = 4.5m to the boundary of the far-field region 
if the parabolic reflector is used for Ku-band transmission 
of a 12-GHz signal.
Solution:
The wavelength for a 12-GHz signal is approximately
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 12/44
D = 4.5m, therefore
Therefore, the boundary for the far field region for 
this parabolic reflector is a distance greater than     
1620 meters from the antenna.
m 025 . 0
10 12
10 3
9
8
=
= 
m R 1620
025 . 0
) 5 . 4 ( 2
2
=
>
 Antenna Radiation Pattern
Radiation pattern is an indication of radiated 
field strength around the antenna
Omnidirectional: a spherical radiation pattern
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 13/44
Omnidirectional: a spherical radiation pattern
Bidirectional: concentrates energy in certain 
directions at the expense of lower energy in other 
directions
 Antenna Gain
 Antenna Gain is a measure of how much more power in 
dB an antenna will radiate in a certain direction with 
respect to that which would be radiated by a reference 
antenna
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 14/44
antenna
Expressed as dBi, if the reference antenna is an 
isotropic point source
Expressed as dBd, if the reference antenna is an 
half wavelength dipole antenna
 For example, the half-wave dipole antenna has a 2.15dB 
gain as compared to an isotropic radiator
Overall Damaging Effects of 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 15/44
Overall Damaging Effects of 
Wireless Channel on Signal
 The overall damaging effects of Wireless Channel have 
both multiplicative impact damaging the signal - attenuation
(denoted by a(t)), and additive impact damaging the signal 
Overall Channel Damaging Effects (1)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 16/44
(denoted by a(t)), and additive impact damaging the signal 
known as noise (denoted by n(t)) and interference
(denoted by j(t)), as shown in the figure next slice 
Overall Channel Damaging Effects (2)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 17/44
s(t): transmitted signal
a(t): radio channel attenuation
j(t): interfering signal
n(t): time-varying random noise
y(t): received signal            y(t) = a(t) * s(t) + j(t) + n(t)
 As shown in the last figure, the received signal may first 
be influenced by a multiplicative factor, the attenuation 
a(t). Actually there are two main different attenuation 
effects which result in an overall attenuation of the 
Overall Channel Damaging Effects (3)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 18/44
effects which result in an overall attenuation of the 
transmitted signal:
a(t)=a
PL
(t)*a
FA
(t)
Where     a
PL
(t): attenuation of Large-scale Path Loss;        
a
FA
(t): attenuation of Small-scale Fading and Multipath.
Large-Scale Path Loss Effects
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 19/44
Large-Scale Path Loss Effects
Path Loss is a type of deterministic effect 
depending only on the distance between the 
transmitter and receiver. 
Path Loss (1)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 20/44
 It plays an important role on larger time scales (e.g.
seconds or minutes), since the distance between 
transmitter and receiver in most situations does not 
change significantly on smaller time scales. 
Definition:  In a communication system, path loss is the 
attenuation undergone by an electromagnetic wave in 
transit between a transmitter and receiver. 
Note 1: Path loss may be due to many effects such as 
Path Loss (2)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 21/44
Note 1: Path loss may be due to many effects such as 
free-space loss, refraction, reflection, diffraction, 
scattering, aperture-medium, and absorption.
Note 2: Path loss usually refers to long-distance loss (km).
Note 3: Path loss is usually measureded in dB (decibel).
Large-scale Propagation Models
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 22/44
Large-scale Propagation Models
Large-scale Propagation Models
 Two Simplified Outdoor models:
 Free-Space Propagation model
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 23/44
 Two-Ray Propagation model
 Other Outdoor Propagation models
 Some Indoor Propagation models
Free-Space Propagation (1)
 In free space, a signal suffers from propagating over a 
distance between two antennas assuming line of sight (LOS: no 
objects obstructing the path between the transmitter and 
receiver). 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 24/44
receiver). 
 Its usually called a free-space path loss, which can be 
calculated using the Maxwell equations and is given by:
, G G
d 4
P P
r t
2
t R
  |
\
|
=
[   ] ) log( 10 ) log( 10
4
log 20 log 10
r t
t
R
t
R
G G
d P
P
dB
P
P
+ +
|
\
|
= =
Or in dB: 
Free-Space Propagation (2)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 25/44
where  is the received power,  is the transmitted 
power,   is the wavelength, G
t
is the gain of the 
transmitter antenna and G
r
is the gain of the receiver 
antenna (both gains in the direction of the straight line that 
connects the two antennas in space), d is the distance.
R
P
t
P
Further notes
 d = the distance between the transmitter 
antenna and the receiver antenna (m)
 Pr = power received (W)
 Pt = power transmitted (W)
Free-Space Propagation (3)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 26/44
 Pt = power transmitted (W)
 Gt = transmitting antenna gain compared to 
isotropic radiator (not in dB). Normally a Unit 
Gain is chosen in many cases, i.e. G =1
 Gr = receiving antenna gain compared to isotropic 
radiator (not in dB)
 = wavelength (m) 
 The received power is inversely proportional to the square of 
the distance and the square of the frequency. 
 Physical explanation:
1. In free space, the radiated energy propagates equally in every 
direction and the wave can be seen as a sphere of increasing radius. 
Free-Space Propagation (4)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 27/44
direction and the wave can be seen as a sphere of increasing radius. 
2. Since energy cant be destroyed, it will be the same whatever the 
distance from the radiating point is. So that the total energy over 
the sphere is the same independent of the radius, the energy per 
unit surface must decrease. 
3. As the surface increases with the square of the radius, so does 
energy per unit surface decrease at the inverse rate.
 Assumes far-field (d - distance) 
d >> D  and  d >>  , where
 D is the largest linear dimension of the antenna
   is the carrier wavelength
Free-Space Propagation (5)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 28/44
   is the carrier wavelength
 No interference, no obstructions
 Path Loss is a measure of attenuation based 
only on the distance to the transmitter
 Free space model only valid in far-field
 Example:
Two /2 dipoles are separated by 50km. They are aligned 
for optimum reception. The transmitter feeds its 
antenna with 10W at 144MHz. Calculate the power 
received. 
Solution:
The two dipoles have a gain of 2.15dB. Therefore                      
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 29/44
The two dipoles have a gain of 2.15dB. Therefore                      
G
t 
= G
r
= 10
(2.15/10)
= 1.64
(   )
W
W
d
G G P
d P
  r t t
r
10
2
3 2
2
6
8
2 2
2
10 96 . 2
10 50 16
10 144
10 3
64 . 1 64 . 1 10
16
) (
 =
 
|
|
\
|
=
 Since most communications happen close to the earth 
surface, the scenario for free-space loss is unrealistic.
 The two-ray model is a simple model based on physical-
optics theory which takes into account the reflection on the 
Two-Ray Propagation Model (1)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 30/44
optics theory which takes into account the reflection on the 
earth surface. It also assumes LOS and no influence on 
propagation besides the earth surface.
 It is a useful starting point for the study of propagation for 
personal communications. It is often used to describe
propagation over open fields.
Direct wave
Reflected wave
Two-Ray Propagation Model (2)
 In the two-ray model, two propagation paths between the 
transmitter/receiver are considered: the direct wave (LOS) 
path, and the reflected wave path. (h
TX
, h
Rx
and d are known.)
h
Tx
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 31/44
2 2
22 21 2
) (   d h h d d d
x
R
x
T
  + + = + =
2 2
1
) (   d h h d
x
R
x
T
  +  =
d
h h
x x
  R T
  
= arctan 
h
Tx
h
Rx
path length of direct wave:
path length of reflected wave:
Why?
 After some approximation, the two-ray propagation model 
is simplified as the known 4th-power-law form:
h h
2
| |
Two-Ray Propagation Model (3)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 32/44
,
d
h h
G G P P
2
2
R T
r t t 1 R
x x
|
|
\
|
=
 Power falls off proportional to d
4
and is independent of 
signal wavelength.
The Two-Ray Ground Reflection model has 
been found to be reasonably accurate for 
predicting large-scale signal strength over 
distances of several kilometers for mobile 
Two-Ray Propagation Model (4)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 33/44
distances of several kilometers for mobile 
radio systems that use tall towers (heights 
which exceed 50m), as well as for LOS
microcell channels in urban environments.
This model is not accurate for complicated indoor 
environments.
 The above 2 simplified outdoor propagation models are 
attempt to predict path loss close to the Earths surface.
 However, communication often takes place over irregular 
terrain. Hence, the above assumptions are unrealistic:
 The terrain profile of a particular area needs to be taken into 
account for obtaining better estimates of path loss. 
Other Outdoor Empirical Models
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 34/44
account for obtaining better estimates of path loss. 
 Irregular terrain, like in cities, doesn't lend itself to simple 
analytical path loss models.
 For example, the terrain profile may vary from a simple curved 
Earth profile to a highly mountainous profile. 
 A number of propagation models were proposed to predict 
path loss over irregular terrain. These models are empirical.
Empirical Outdoor models
 Empirical path loss models based on extensive 
measurements.
 First, well show the 2 most commonly used 
empirical outdoor models in conjunction with 900 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 35/44
empirical outdoor models in conjunction with 900 
MHz (macro) cellular systems: Hatas mode and 
Lees model.
 By macro-cell we mean a cell typically on the order of 
tens of kilometers.
Then, well list some other empirical outdoor 
models.
Okumura-Hatas models (1)
 The Hata model is an empirical formulation of the graphical 
path loss data which was provided by Okumura. 
 Hata presented the urban propagation loss as a standard
formula and supplied correction Equations for Applications to 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 36/44
formula and supplied correction Equations for Applications to 
other situations
 Carrier Frequency : 150 MHz  fc  1500 MHz
 Base Station Height : 30m  hb  200m
 Mobile Station Height: 1m  hm  10m
 T-R distance : 1km  d  20km
Okumura-Hatas models (2)
Lp is the path loss:
for urban area Lp = A + B log10(d) 
for suburban area Lp = A + B log10(d) - C
for open area Lp = A + B log10(d) - D
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 37/44
for open area Lp = A + B log10(d) - D
A = 69.55 + 26.16 log10(fc)  13.82 log10(hb)  a(hm)
B = 44.9  6.55 log10(hb)
C = 5.4 + 2[log10(fc/28)]2
D = 40.94 + 4.78 [log10(fc)]2  18.33 log10(fc)
When applies to small to medium cities,
a(hm) = [1.1 log10(fc)  0.7]hm  1.56 log10(fc)  0.8
Okumura-Hatas models (3)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 38/44
When large cities and for fc  400 MHz:
a(hm) = 8.28 [log10(1.54 hm)]2  1.1
When large cities and for fc  400 MHz.
a(hm) = 3.2 [log10(11.75 hm)]2  4.97
Lees models
 Lees path loss model is used to model a flat terrain. 
 Lees model has been known to be more of a North American model 
than that of Hata.
 Received signal power in dBm is given by:
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 39/44
(
=
  0
0
10
) ( ) ( log 10
0
a
f
f
d
d
c
   
 
0
is the power at 1 mile 
is path loss exponent. 
These parameters are determined from empirical measurements
Other Empirical models (1)
Okumuras model - One of most widely used for Urban.
- based on free space path loss + correction factors for 
urban, suburban and rural areas, irregular terrain, street 
orientations
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 40/44
Sakagmi and Kuboi model
- extend Okumuras model using regression analysis of 
data.
Ibrahim and Parsons model
- equations developed to best fit data observed at 
London. (freq. 168-900 MHz)
Other Empirical models (2)
 COST231-HATA model
- the COST231-Hata model extends Hatas model for use in the 
1500-2000 MHz frequency range, which does take into account 
parameters such as roof heights, street widths and building separation.
 Two Slope model
- transmission distances range up to 500 m and antenna heights are 
less than 20 m.
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 41/44
less than 20 m.
 Longley-Rice model
- point-to-point communication system in the frequency range from 
40MHz to 100 GHz.
 Durkins model
 Walfisch and Bertonis model
 Wideband PCS Microcell model
More details read book: Wireless Com: Principles & Practice
Indoor Propagation Models (1)
 Indoor propagation is also dominated by reflection, 
diffraction and scattering as outdoor, but conditions are 
much more variable.
 Specialized models for indoor propagation also exist. 
These factor losses within the same floor (partition losses 
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 42/44
These factor losses within the same floor (partition losses 
due to walls and other materials, including furniture) or 
losses for propagation across floors. Losses due to the latter 
are adjusted by way of the floor attenuation factor (FAF). 
 Finally sophisticated ray-tracing and site-specific 
modeling techniques also have been developed.
Indoor Propagation Models (2)
 Partition losses (same floors).
 Partition losses between floors.
 Log-distance path loss model.
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 43/44
 Log-distance path loss model.
 Ericsson Multiple Breakpoint model.
 Attenuation Factor model.
More Details see the referencing book:
Wireless Communications: Principles & Practice (2
nd
Ed)
Dr Qiang Ni Brunel University 44/44