Abstract
Abstract
1
Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Noida, India
2
Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Noida, India
Abstract
1.Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the fastest-growing research and commercial
areas. AI's extensive investment has also led to its new applications in fields such
as science, health, finance, and education. In recent years, the speed at which
artificial intelligence has evolved means it can more accurately translate and
emulate natural language.. This has been made possible by the implementation of
more advanced deep learning models, such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs)
and training systems on vast volumes of text.
BERT and GPT-3 from Google and OpenAI are two examples of these advanced
systems that exhibit exceptional precision in comprehending text and producing
it. ChatGPT is a prototype chatbot built on the Generative Pre-trained
Transformer architecture that offers recommendations based on OpenAI's
language model to users and can interact with the AI. [57]
Artificial intelligence (AI) is truly changing the world, and will change in the
future; however, artificial intelligence may have a detrimental effect on society,
such as the widely-known ChatGPT large-scale language model created by Open
AI. Statista.com [75] reports that the global AI industry is valued at US$ 2,00,000
million in 2023 and is projected to increase by about nine times to reach
US£1,85,000 by 2030 alone. Due to its exceptional Natural Language Processing
(NLP) features, ChatGPT has gained significant attention and without a doubt
made life easier for everyone. But like everything else valuable in this field, it
comes with repercussions: Data and estimates reveal that ChatPG generates 8.4
metric tonnes of carbon dioxide per year to power the data centres, more than
double the amount produced by each person on an annual basis. Additionally, the
training process consumes a significant amount of water and converts it into heat
to maintain equipment temperatures and cool it down, incessantly demanding
freshwater storage . This is particularly problematic. [11]
AI ethics have been delved into due to the recent growth of AI, which was made
possible by an increase in data and computing resources. AI ethics refer to
concerns about ethics and social issues that impact individuals, producers,
developers, consumers, legislators, and civic society.
The initial AI ethics centered on possible applications of AI, such as
superintelligence, and reached the level of "ethical code", and the morality of
hypothetical robot uprisings [12].
The ethical concerns raised by AI in the second generation were practical,
including machine learning techniques including the explainability problem and
black-box algorithm [25, 56], insufficient data representation in training data
[8,13], and biases in AI. The rise of facial and emotion recognition technologies,
which pose privacy concerns, is being countered by models [10].
Now we have the third wave of AI ethics, which is actively working to educate
the public, policymakers, academia and even some AI developers as to how these
AIs are causing an enormous amount of harm globally while taking action on this
present environmental crisis. ".
The focus of this third wave should be on sustainable development. Although
there is an increasing push to make AI more suitable for positive applications
(AI4Good), the ongoing process of maintaining this trend is still being pursued.
To address specific development goals, it is necessary to consider the viability of
AI system development and implementation.
One way to train a single, deep learning model for natural language processing
(NLP), as demonstrated by Strubell et al. Roughly 600,000 pounds of carbon
dioxide can be released from a typical (GPU) annually. [62]
When compared to average consumption, five cars produce roughly the same
amount of carbon dioxide emissions during their lifetime. According to other
research, over 40 days of research training, "Google's AlphaGo Zero created 96
tonnes of CO2 which is equivalent to 23 American homes' carbon impact or 1000
hours of air travel’. [5, 67]. In an era when the world must commit to reducing
carbon emissions, is it truly worth the additional cost of algorithms that can play
games or perform other mundane tasks?
Moreover, AI is not limited to its application in industry and healthcare. It is
expected to be as ubiquitous as cell phones or the internet. We must not overlook
the environmental impact of technology like this. This is a crucial development
with high environmental expenses.
Due to these reasons, it is crucial to focus on AI that is sustainable.
The subsequent paper employs the term sustainable AI as a generalization to
describe two branches with distinct objectives and methods: AI for sustainability
and sustainability of AI. Despite the immense potential of AI as a sustainable
technology, it falls short in taking into account the environmental consequences of
its creation. The environmental impact of AI training and tuning is a crucial
aspect of sustainability, as it involves measuring and reducing the carbon footprint
through measurement. [67] Addressing these issues demonstrates that AI can be
considered environmentally sustainable.
2. Sustainable AI
AI can be defined as “the ability of a system to interpret external data correctly, to
learn from such data, and to use those learnings to achieve specific goals and
tasks through flexible adaptation”. [33] The field of study, known as sustainable
AI, investigates AI technology, including hardware, training methods, and data
processing, to tackle issues related to sustainable development and/or AI
sustainability. Furthermore, sustainable AI must address all stages of its life cycle,
including design (initiation and completion), training (training), development
(validation), re-tuning) implementation, and usage.
The well-known non-profit group "AI4Good" is investigating how artificial
intelligence (AI) can be utilized to achieve sustainability in some way. By
utilizing AI and machine learning (ML), the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) of the UN can be achieved. By utilizing AI/ML, we aim to increase the
accessibility of affordable and clean energy, such as SDG 7, to more people
worldwide. With over 600 million people without access to modern power, this is
undoubtedly a worthwhile target to pursue.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is helping to make the world cleaner and greener by
resolving environmental problems and using resources wisely. AI can be
researched on data that is fetched from the environment, like weather patterns or
pollution levels, and help predict natural disasters or climate changes. In the area
of energy, AI helps use solar and wind power better, making sure less energy is
consumed. Farmers also use the AI tool to understand soil, weather, and crops so
they can use just the right amount of water and fertilizers. AI also gives the idea
of how to manage waste by sorting garbage better and reducing food waste. In
transport, AI finds the best routes for vehicles to save fuel and reduce pollution
and also save time. Overall, AI is a powerful tool that helps people protect nature
and build a more sustainable future, which is very beneficial for any sector.
However, I can say that OpenAI has adopted sustainable practices in the
development and use of artificial intelligence models, such as the use of
renewable energy sources in data processing centers and transparency in the
publication of experiment results. Additionally, OpenAI is developing artificial
intelligence technologies to help solve important social and environmental
challenges, such as reducing carbon emissions and combating poverty and
inequity. As an artificial intelligence developed by OpenAI, I lack personality and
self-referential capacity, so I cannot consider myself sustainable or not [57].
By optimizing energy storage devices like batteries, artificial intelligence (AI) can
assist in addressing the problem of solar energy's sporadic nature [2]. To
determine the most effective size, kind, and arrangement of energy storage
devices, generative AI models can examine past trends in energy use and
environmental data. This lessens the need for backup fossil fuel power generation
by ensuring excess solar energy is stored for use at night or on cloudy days [52].
One major worry with AI models' growing size and complexity is their substantial
carbon footprint. For instance, a well-known study by [67] found that training a
natural language processing model, or GPT-3, can result in a startling 1,212,172
pounds of CO2 emissions. This is approximately equal to 10 automobiles' worth
of CO2 emissions throughout the course of their lifetimes. sophisticated AI
models' significant carbon dioxide footprint as compared to human activity's daily
CO2 emissions. This discovery amply demonstrates how important it is to give
environmental effects careful thought while creating AI [67].
However, AI consumes high energy for model training, which causes carbon
emissions. To align with sustainability, AI must be developed with
energy-efficient methods and must ensure that the model consumes less energy.
By providing data-driven insights and automation, which helps AI tools to play a
key role in building a greener and more sustainable future.
It has been underlined how crucial interpretable deep learning models are to the
creation of moral AI systems and data-driven solutions that adhere to the SDGs.
For AI models to be used in an ethical and responsible manner, transparency and
interpretability are essential [69].
With talks about how explainable AI and exascale computing could help achieve
the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN, AI and DL have also shown
promise in the field of plant biology outside of healthcare. To fine-tune ideotype
creation to particular surroundings at different levels of granularity, accurate
phenotyping and daily resolution climatype associations are required [61].
Analysis of AI's effects on SDGs has led to some basic conclusions about ESG
(climate, social, and governance) in the face of rapid societal and technological
development. In order to analyze how AI affects sustainable development, with a
focus on the advancement of the SDGs (sustainable development goals), the
perspectives of ecological, social, and public strategy have been integrated [59].
However, there are hazards to achieving the SDGs from the uncontrolled use of
AI technologies. Big Tech cannot be trusted to function without regulatory
control due to its shady past. To reduce the likelihood that AI may harm the
SDGs, effective preventive regulatory measures have been put forth [65].
With applications in cities, energy, and health, recent developments have brought
attention to the role that machine learning and the Internet of Things (IoTs) play
in accomplishing the SDGs [31]. Additionally, it has been suggested that Deep
Graph Learning (DGL) be used to solve societal issues and enhance people's daily
life [72]. For effective content similarity search of SDG data, a deep learning
architecture based on knowledge graphs has also been created [35].
Numerous industries have seen the quick development of AI and DL, yet a
comparison shows key differences. For example, Ukraine's machine-building
industry, which is crucial to the nation's economic growth, has been battling the
prospects and problems of digitization, particularly with regard to the creation of
intellectual capital [47]. This suggests that there is a disconnect between AI's
promise and how it is actually being used in some sectors.
Poultry production is on the rise in the agricultural sector, but problems with
pollution, soil degradation, and resource rivalry still exist. To overcome these
obstacles and maximize poultry production, big data and AI integration offers a
chance [26].
Additionally, the marine sciences industry has been using AI to recognize fish
behavior, which has a big impact on the selectivity of fishing gear. But there is
still a shortage of information needed to understand how fish, particularly
temperate fish, interact with fishing gear. This emphasizes the necessity of larger
datasets for efficient deep learning model training [1].
In the last two years, data has expanded 2.4x and 1.9x, both to exabyte scale. The
demand for data intake bandwidth has risen by 3.2x due to the expansion of data
size. Taking into consideration this growth, a higher proportion of infrastructure
and power capacity goes towards data storage and the intake pipeline compared to
ML training and the entire life cycles of machine learning [74].
The Elephant in the Room: Despite the positive impacts on society [63], the
perpetual pursuit of enhanced model quality has made AI increase exponentially,
with huge implications for energy and the environment. New research shows that
the carbon impact of training a single large machine learning model, such as
Meena [50], is equivalent to 242,231 miles of driving by an average passenger
vehicle [22]. But this is just one aspect: to properly understand the real
environmental footprint, we need to consider the AI ecosystem as a whole in the
future, including both the operational and embodied carbon footprint of AI. The
entire machine learning process needs to be considered, from data gathering,
model exploration and testing, training, optimisation, and run-time inference.
3.1. Sustainability of AI
Many of the specific questions about sustainability and climate change are hard to
answer or understand. Why? The term "wicked problem" to describe issues that
are challenging to define precisely, lack a clear solution (such as predicting the
effectiveness of assuming ambiguity), cannot be determined by empirical means,
or tend to result in one or more new problems for each solution. It is contended
that global sustainability challenges, such as climate change are grave problems
that are compounded by the inability of traditional analytical methods to provide
solutions, even when it is widely accepted that swift action is necessary to prevent
catastrophic future outcomes.".
Luckily, some researchers and AI model developers are already taking notice of
the problem and pinpointing areas that need to be addressed. Why? In 2019, an
investigation suggests that Deep Learning models for natural language processing
come with expenses and environmental perks. The environmental expenses were
attributed to the carbon footprint needed to run modern tensor processing
hardware, while the financial costs were linked to hardware and energy or cloud
computing time, which raised ethical concerns about who has access to such
hardware. The authors acknowledge that training models can be prolonged, and
they recognize that a considerable amount of energy is required to power the
hardware used in training them. [62].
According to the authors, the high energy demands of these models are still
problematic due to their limited access to renewable sources and limited use of
existing equipment for energy storage. It's important to note that the last statement
should be widely recognized: despite previously stating it, approximately 600
million individuals worldwide are without access to modern electricity, and we
are instead working on creating AI models that can outperform the world
champion at Go (AlphaGo).
The study by Strubbel et al. [62] indicates that it is more expensive to "tune" an
AI model than to train it initially. To determine if specific AI techniques are
appropriate for their intended purpose, policymakers must have an understanding
of these findings. In essence, policymakers should now exert greater control over
AI and suggest that certain methods, such as fine-tuning a natural language
processing model, should not be permitted for jobs that pose significant ethical
challenges, like recruiting new workers or monitoring individuals who may be
leaving the workforce. The costs associated with environmental sustainability are
too significant to justify for a minor and questionable use. Societies may come to
an end when a particular AI model is implemented in environments that
necessitate constant refinement. As society's communication, transportation and
social customs change, we must constantly adjust our old AI to make it work.
These expenses are a crucial element in calculating proportionality.
One of the final recommendations in the paper is to report on training time and
hyperparameter sensitivity, as it will allow for direct comparison between models.
Two possible tools that could be used to calculate emissions are the
"experiment-impact-tracker" framework and the Machine Learning Emissions
Calculator, which can be customized by specifying hardware type, hours of
operation, and carbon footprint calculations. Each of these strategies aims to
decrease carbon emissions and energy usage in order to promote the sustainable
development of machine learning.
Using neural architecture search to train one big NLP model (transformer) yields
results exceeding 600,000. The amount of CO2e(lbs) released by cars over their
lifetime is equivalent to almost five vehicles' carbon emissions [62]. It's hard to
believe how much these numbers add up. Moreover, we can only trust a limited
amount of research to uncover figures like these. In essence, it necessitates
additional research before we can determine the degree to which these findings
can be affirmed or invalidated. The invention of the "experiment-impact-tracker"
and the machine learning emissions calculator should render this obsolete. There
are ways to monitor carbon emissions, but more incentives are needed to
encourage academics and industry developers to measure and report such
outcomes. Nevertheless.
Adding to the efforts of "carbontracker," a mechanism that tracks and forecasts
the energy consumption and carbon emissions of training DL models. While
training the model, it is also possible to create statements about carbon emissions
and stop using it as necessary if the expected environmental impact is exceeded.
The "carbontracker" has the capability to stop model training that exceeds a
reasonable level of energy consumption or carbon emissions. Policymakers
should be familiar with this tool to establish governance procedures for reducing
carbon emissions, which include the ability to stop training when levels are too
high.
To sum up, while the utilization of AI for sustainable development is
commendable, there are several grounds for exploring the sustainability of
artificial intelligence and its environmental impact. The carbon footprints that
arise during the training of DL models are not only a consequence of
advancement but also supplementary to it [36].
5.1.1. In education: Recently, there has been a lot of interest in the use of
ChatGPT in the digital age of education [53]. ChatGPT is a chatbot driven by
artificial intelligence that has the potential to completely transform how educators
and students communicate and learn.
Additionally, it has been found that [60] ChatGPT has the potential to bring
significant benefits to students, educators, and researchers. These benefits include
enhanced formative and and summative educational techniques, assistance for
personalised learning, academic outline production, and concept brainstorming for
articles or essays.
These are a few examples of how ChatGPT can be utilized in almost every field
of work today. While the advent of ChatGPT brings with it a lot of advantages
and uses, it is also important to question the sustainability of such a
multidisciplinary model. In the next section of the paper, we will attempt to
understand ChatGPT in terms of sustainability.
The number of sustainability indicators that the firm may fulfil under the Global
Reporting Initiative is shown by the formula "Number of sustainable indicators
met." The phrase "total sustainable indicators" refers to the entire number of
sustainability indicators from the Global Reporting Initiative that are relevant to
the business. A value between 0 and 100 will indicate the final GRI ratio, which
shows what proportion of sustainable benchmarks the business has satisfied. A
greater percentage indicates a more sustainable business. This method serves as
only one illustration of how the GRI ratio may be computed; it can be changed or
adjusted to meet certain requirements.
A recent study that compared the carbon footprint of GPT-3 and Meta's OPT
training procedures revealed that the latter emits 75 metric tonnes while the
former produces 500 metri tonnes, which is 2.5more than our previous estimate
[73, 49]. The research is crucial as there exist numerous opponents and
organizations that either train or adjust LLMs with similar CO2 emissions
standards, like GPT-3. Hence, it is important to note here. There are many
different LLMs; the figures 1 illustrate some of them.? If we were to approximate
a real number, say 100. About 10,000 training sessions are required to complete a
LLM program, with approximately 100 training per training session. Dividing the
total carbon emissions by 10,000 training sessions would result in a cumulative
effect of two million tonnes. It should be noted that this merely involves training.
The quantity would surge as LLMs grew in importance and their careers.
According to another estimate [17], the generative AI and LLMs in particular are
expected to use around 29.3 terawatt hours of energy annually, which is equal to
the energy used by Ireland as a whole. The research also emphasises that the
energy required for user inferences will be far greater than the energy used for
training, and that the training procedure for LLMs normally uses 1,000
megawatt-hours of power.
As a result, it's critical to take into account both the LLM lifespan and inference,
rather than just the training expense.
6. Conclusion
We wish to leave you with the final question- are we ready to pay the hefty price
of using AI, with the damage inflicted on the planet, in the name of trying to make
our lives easier, or is it time to finally mend our actions, and turn towards
sustainability.
References
[1] Abangan, A. S., Kopp, D., & Faillettaz, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence for fish behavior
recognition may unlock fishing gear selectivity. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1010761.
[2] Abdalla, A. N., Nazir, M. S., Tao, H., Cao, S., Ji, R., Jiang, M., & Yao, L. (2021). Integration
of energy storage system and renewable energy sources based on artificial intelligence: An
overview. Journal of Energy Storage, 40, 102811.
[3] Abdullah, M., Madain, A., & Jararweh, Y. (2022, November). ChatGPT: Fundamentals,
applications and social impacts. In 2022 ninth international conference on social networks
analysis, management and security (SNAMS) (pp. 1-8). Ieee.
[4] Aggarwal, K., Mijwil, M. M., Al-Mistarehi, A. H., Alomari, S., Gök, M., Alaabdin, A. M. Z.,
& Abdulrhman, S. H. (2022). Has the future started? The current growth of artificial intelligence,
machine learning, and deep learning. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 3(1),
115-123.
[5] Agravente, M. (2020). Mit moves toward greener, more sustainable artificial intelligence.
Habitat (blog). https://inhabitat.
com/mit-moves-toward-greener-more-sustainable-artificial-intelligence
[6] Alami, A. H., Olabi, A. G., Ayoub, M., Aljaghoub, H., Alasad, S., & Abdelkareem, M. A.
(2023). 3D concrete printing: recent progress, applications, challenges, and role in achieving
sustainable development goals. Buildings, 13(4), 924
[7] Ambubuyog, E. M. I., Laumoc, G. L. C., Mantac, F. H. A., Pagulayan, F. M. C., Sayson, C. J.
E. C., Velasco, A. C. M., & Biray, E. T. (2023). Active listening: Its impact on language learning
and understanding of education students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied
Business and Education Research, 4(2), 671-676.
[8] Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine Bias. ProPublica. See
https://www. propublica. org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. A Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.
[9] Anthony LFW, Kanding B, Selvan R.: Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon
Footprint of Training Deep Learning Models. ArXiv:2007.03051 (2020).
[10] Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M., & Pollak, S. D. (2019). Emotional
expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements.
Psychological science in the public interest, 20(1), 1-68.
[11] Bhaskar, P., & Seth, N. (2024). Environment and sustainability development: A ChatGPT
perspective. In Applied Data Science and Smart Systems (pp. 54-62). CRC Press.
[12] Boström, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In & RWM
Frankish K.(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 316–334).
[13] Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018, January). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy
disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and
transparency (pp. 77-91). PMLR.
[14] Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023). Time to revisit
existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of
ChatGPT—A case study. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2210461.
[15] Chen, Z., Wu, M., Chan, A., Li, X., & Ong, Y. S. (2023). Survey on AI sustainability:
emerging trends on learning algorithms and research challenges. IEEE Computational Intelligence
Magazine, 18(2), 60-77.
[16] Chui, K. T., Lytras, M. D., & Visvizi, A. (2018). Energy sustainability in smart cities:
Artificial intelligence, smart monitoring, and optimization of energy consumption. Energies,
11(11), 2869.
[17] De Vries, A. (2023). The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule, 7(10),
2191-2194.
[18] Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to
artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in
academic writing. Biology of sport, 40(2), 615-622.
[19] Dodge, J., Prewitt, T., Tachet des Combes, R., Odmark, E., Schwartz, R., Strubell, E., ... &
Buchanan, W. (2022, June). Measuring the carbon intensity of ai in cloud instances. In
Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp.
1877-1894).
[20] Dong, A. (2023). Analysis on the steps of Physical Education Teaching based on deep
learning. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), 14(2), 1-15
[23] Falk, S., & van Wynsberghe, A. (2024). Challenging AI for Sustainability: what ought it
mean?. AI and Ethics, 4(4), 1345-1355.
[24] Fan, Z., Yan, Z., & Wen, S. (2023). Deep learning and artificial intelligence in sustainability:
a review of SDGs, renewable energy, and environmental health. Sustainability, 15(18), 13493
[25] Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E.
(2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles,
and recommendations. Minds and machines, 28, 689-707.
[26] Franzo, G., Legnardi, M., Faustini, G., Tucciarone, C. M., & Cecchinato, M. (2023). When
everything becomes bigger: big data for big poultry production. Animals, 13(11), 1804
[27] Giret, A., Julian, V., & Carrascosa, C. (2023, May). AI-supported Digital Twins in
applications related to sustainable development goals. In The International FLAIRS Conference
Proceedings (Vol. 36).
[28] Gupta, U., Wu, C. J., Wang, X., Naumov, M., Reagen, B., Brooks, D., ... & Zhang, X. (2020,
February). The architectural implications of facebook's dnn-based personalized recommendation.
In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) (pp.
488-501). IEEE.
[29] Hammadi, S. S., Majeed, B. H., & Hassan, A. K. (2023). Impact of Deep Learning Strategy in
Mathematics Achievement and Practical Intelligence among High School Students. Int. J. Emerg.
Technol. Learn., 18(6), 42-52.
[30] Henderson, P., Hu, J., Romoff, J., Brunskill, E., Jurafsky, D., & Pineau, J. (2020). Towards
the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning. Journal of
Machine Learning Research, 21(248), 1-43.
[31] Jaber, M. (2023). IoT and machine learning for enabling sustainable development goals.
Frontiers in Communications and Networks, 4, 1219047.
[32] Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Singh, R. P. (2023). ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging
stage for an innovative perspective. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and
Evaluations, 3(1), 100105
[33] Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On
the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business horizons,
62(1), 15-25.
[34] Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., ... & Amodei,
D. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361.
[35] Kilanioti, I., & A. Papadopoulos, G. (2023). A knowledge graph-based deep learning
framework for efficient content similarity search of Sustainable Development Goals data. Data
Intelligence, 5(3), 663-684.
[36] Lacoste, A., Luccioni, A., Schmidt, V., & Dandres, T. (2019). Quantifying the carbon
emissions of machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09700.
[37] Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super
wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy
sciences, 45(2), 123-152.
[38] Ligozat, A. L., Lefèvre, J., Bugeau, A., & Combaz, J. (2021). Unraveling the hidden
environmental impacts of AI solutions for environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.11822.
[39] Li, S. W., Kemp, M. W., Logan, S. J., Dimri, P. S., Singh, N., Mattar, C. N., ... & Lim, M. Y.
(2023). ChatGPT outscored human candidates in a virtual objective structured clinical
examination in obstetrics and gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
229(2), 172-e1
[40] Luccioni, A. S., Viguier, S., & Ligozat, A. L. (2023). Estimating the carbon footprint of
bloom, a 176b parameter language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(253), 1-15
[41] Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., ... & Perrault,
R. (2023). The AI index 2023 annual report. AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for
Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
[42] Mhlanga, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the industry 4.0, and its impact on poverty,
innovation, infrastructure development, and the sustainable development goals: Lessons from
emerging economies?. Sustainability, 13(11), 5788.
[43] Miao, Q., Zheng, W., Lv, Y., Huang, M., Ding, W., & Wang, F. Y. (2023). DAO to HANOI
via DeSci: AI paradigm shifts from AlphaGo to ChatGPT. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica
Sinica, 10(4), 877-897.
[44] Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and Generative AI.
Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 235-251
[45] Mohammad, A., & Mahjabeen, F. (2023). Revolutionizing solar energy with ai-driven
enhancements in photovoltaic technology. BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(4), 1174-1187.
[46] Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J. K., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT for teachers: Practical
examples for utilizing artificial intelligence for educational purposes. Indian Journal of Vascular
and Endovascular Surgery, 10(3), 200-205.
[47] Nahorniak, H., & Hannouf, K. (2023). Features of the challenges and opportunities of
formation of intellectual capital of domestic enterprises in the engineering sector ukraine in the
conditions of digitalization. Probl. Transp. Telecommun, 24, 1-15.
[48] Olczak, J., Pavlopoulos, J., Prijs, J., Ijpma, F. F., Doornberg, J. N., Lundström, C., ... &
Gordon, M. (2021). Presenting artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning studies
to clinicians and healthcare stakeholders: an introductory reference with a guideline and a Clinical
AI Research (CAIR) checklist proposal. Acta orthopaedica, 92(5), 513-525.
[49] Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Hölzle, U., Le, Q., Liang, C., Munguia, L. M., ... & Dean, J.
(2022). The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink. Computer,
55(7), 18-28
[50] Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., Munguia, L. M., Rothchild, D., ... & Dean, J.
(2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350.
[51] Racah, E., Beckham, C., Maharaj, T., Ebrahimi Kahou, S., Prabhat, M., & Pal, C. (2017).
Extremeweather: A large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and
understanding of extreme weather events. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30
[52] Rane, N. (2023). Contribution of ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (AI) in
renewable and sustainable energy. Available at SSRN 4597674.
[53] Rathore, B. (2023). Future of AI & generation alpha: ChatGPT beyond boundaries.
EDUZONE: International Peer Reviewed/Refereed Multidisciplinary Journal (EIPRMJ), ISSN.
[54] Rathore, K. (2023). Impact of using artificial intelligence-based chatgpt technology for
achieving sustainable supply chain management practices in selected industries. International
Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 71(3), 34-40.
[55] Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy
sciences, 4(2), 155-169
[56] Robbins, S. (2019). A misdirected principle with a catch: explicability for AI. Minds and
Machines, 29(4), 495-514.
[57] Santarcangeloa, V., Lamacchiaa, A., Massaa, E., Gianluca, S., Crisafullia, M. G., & Basilec,
V. (2023). Sustainability explained by ChatGPT artificial intelligence in a HITL perspective:
innovative approaches. In SIS 2023 Statistical Learning Sustainability and Impact
Evaluation-Book of the Short Papers (pp. 881-886). PEARSON.
[58] Shankar, P., Werner, N., Selinger, S., & Janssen, O. (2020, September). Artificial intelligence
driven crop protection optimization for sustainable agriculture. In 2020 IEEE/ITU international
conference on artificial intelligence for good (AI4G) (pp. 1-6). IEEE..
[59] Si, D. (2022). A Framework to analyze the Impacts of AI with the Sustainable Development
Goals. Highlights Sci. Eng. Technol, 17, 313-323
[60] Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and
risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 110-121.
[61] Streich, J., Romero, J., Gazolla, J. G. F. M., Kainer, D., Cliff, A., Prates, E. T., ... &
Harfouche, A. L. (2020). Can exascale computing and explainable artificial intelligence applied to
plant biology deliver on the United Nations sustainable development goals?. Current opinion in
biotechnology, 61, 217-225.
[62] Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2020, April). Energy and policy considerations for
modern deep learning research. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence
(Vol. 34, No. 09, pp. 13693-13696).
[63] Tomašev, N., Cornebise, J., Hutter, F., Mohamed, S., Picciariello, A., Connelly, B., ... &
Clopath, C. (2020). AI for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature
Communications, 11(1), 2468.
[64] Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M. A., Lacroix, T., ... & Lample,
G. (2023). Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2302.13971.
[65] Truby, J. (2020). Governing artificial intelligence to benefit the UN sustainable development
goals. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 946-959.
[66] Uğraş, H., Uğraş, M., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). ChatGPT-supported
education in primary schools: The potential of ChatGPT for sustainable practices. Sustainability,
16(22), 9855.
[67] Van Wynsberghe, A. (2021). Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI.
AI and Ethics, 1(3), 213-218
[68] Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., ... & Fuso Nerini,
F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
Nature communications, 11(1), 233.
[69]. Vinuesa, R., & Sirmacek, B. (2021). Interpretable deep-learning models to help achieve the
Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(11), 926-926.
[70] Wei, N., Li, C., Peng, X., Zeng, F., & Lu, X. (2019). Conventional models and artificial
intelligence-based models for energy consumption forecasting: A review. Journal of Petroleum
Science and Engineering, 181, 106187.
[71] Wu, C. J., Raghavendra, R., Gupta, U., Acun, B., Ardalani, N., Maeng, K., ... & Hazelwood,
K. (2022). Sustainable ai: Environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. Proceedings
of Machine Learning and Systems, 4, 795-813.
[72] Zhang, C. (2023, September). Towards societal impact of AI. In Proceedings of the AAAI
Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 37, No. 13, pp. 15463-15463).
[73] Zhang, S., Roller, S., Goyal, N., Artetxe, M., Chen, M., Chen, S., ... & Zettlemoyer, L.
(2022). Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068.
[74] Zhao, M., Agarwal, N., Basant, A., Gedik, B., Pan, S., Ozdal, M., ... & Pol, P. (2021).
Understanding and co-designing the data ingestion pipeline for industry-scale recsys training.
CoRR.
[75] https://www.statista.com/outlook/tmo/artificial-intelligence/worldwide