GFM Unit-1
GFM Unit-1
The subject matter of international finance can be looked from two perspectives: (a) the
economic perspective and (b) the business perspective. Since business enterprise has to
operate in an economic environment therefore the analysis of business aspects will be
incomplete without the analysis from economic perspective.
In general the students of economics ten to concentrate on macroeconomic issues such as:
balance of payments, the establishment of external and internal equilibrium, the internal
financial adjustment process, the determination of exchange rates. The students of business
mainly concentrate on investments, i.e. from where to barrow and where to invest.
The finance function has to be performed by financial manager by keeping in view of the
financial objectives of the organization. The objectives of the organization are
Limitations
Market price of shares will not influenced by Earnings per share (EPS)
EPS/PAT will not increase the economic welfare of the organization
It does not consider the payment of dividend
It ignores things and risk of expected benefit
Finance functions of a global finance manager are not different from that of a finance
manager of a domestically oriented company. The only difference lies in the recognition of
additional risks and opportunities present in the global economy. Generally speaking there
are two broad finance functions of global finance manager.
(a) Acquisition / Mobilization of funds (b) Investment/ Deployment of funds. These two
broad functions can further be looked in the context of various operational finance
functions in a firm. These operational finance functions can be further categorised in two
types of functions:
Forecasting the financial environment: Prices, inflation rates, interest rates and
exchange rates.
Exchange risk management: Measuring the effects of exchange rate changes on
balance sheets, income, cash flows and managing their risks.
Management of assets: From cash management to international capital budgeting,
both at home and abroad, in terms of domestic and foreign currencies.
Financial institutions that have been established by more than one country and followed
international laws, it include
The international monetary system went through several distinct stages of evolution. These
stages are summarized as follows.
Prior to the 1870s, many countries had bimetallism, that is, a double standard in that free
coinage was maintained for both gold and silver. In Great Britain, for example, bimetallism
was maintained until 1816 when parliament passed a law maintaining free coinage of gold
only, abolishing the free coinage of silver. In the United States, bimetallism was adopted by
the coinage Act of 1972 and remained a legal standard until 1873, when congress dropped the
silver dollar from the list of coins to be minted. France, on the other hand, introduced and
maintained its bimetallism from the French Revolution to 1878. Some other countries such as
China, India, Germany, and Holland were on the silver standard.
The International monetary system before the 1870s can be characterised as “Bimetallism” in
the sense that both gold and silver were used as international means of payment and that the
exchange rates among currencies were determined by either their gold or silver contents. For
example, the exchange rate between the British pound, which was fully on a gold standard,
and the French franc, which was officially on a bimetallic standard, was determined by the
gold content of the two currencies. On the other hand, the exchange rate between the franc
and German mark, which was on a silver standard, was determined by the silver content of
the currencies.
Under this gold standard, the exchange rate between any two currencies will be determined
by their gold content. For example, suppose that the pound is pegged to gold at six pounds
per ounce, whereas one ounce of gold is worth 12 franc. The exchange rate between the
pound and the franc should then be two franc per pound. To the extent that the pound and the
franc remain pegged to gold at given prices, the exchange rate between the two currencies
will remain stable. In simple Exchange rate between two countries would be determined by
gold, it refers gold was the base to determine currency exchange rates.
Fix an official gold price for the national currency in terms of ounce of pure gold.
Example: The British government set the pounds for ounce of pure gold (31.1034768
grams) at 4.24 pounds and the US government set its parity at the rate of $ 20.67 per
ounce of pure gold. Here 1 pound = 4.87$
Permit the free conversion of gold into domestic money and domestic money into
gold at the parity (Exchange rate) price in unlimited amounts without question.
Eliminate all restrictions on foreign exchange transactions and allow the import and
export of gold.
Economic growth
Globalization
Price stability
Output stability X
Policy flexibility X
Mutual beneficial ?
Self regulating ?
Even the facade of the restored gold standard was destroyed in the wake of the Great
depression and the accompanying financial crises. Following the stock market crash and the
onset of the Great depression in 1929, many banks, especially in Austria, Germany, and the
United States, suffered sharp declines in their portfolio values, touching off runs on the
banks. Against this backdrop, Britain experienced a massive outflow of gold, which resulted
from chronic balance of payment deficits and lack of confidence in the pound sterling. In
September 1931 the British government suspended gold payments and let the pound float. As
a Great Britain got of gold, countries such as Canada, Sweden, Austria, and Japan followed
suit by the end of 1931. The United States got of gold in April 1933 after experiencing a
spate of bank failures and out flows of gold. Lastly France abandoned the gold standard in
1936. Paper standards came into begin when the gold standard was abandoned. During this
period that the U.S. dollar emerged as the dominant world currency, gradually replacing the
British pound for the role. In brief during 1914-1918 gold standards majorly influenced by
First World War, john Maynard, Keynes argued that the countries need tight and strong
monetary policies to restore the real value of gold relative to the currencies.
Economic growth X
Globalization X
Price stability X
Output stability X
Policy flexibility X
Mutual beneficial X
Self regulating X
Phase IV- The Bretton Woods System (1945-1973) (International Financial Management
by Cheol S Eun & Bruce G Resnick, Page No: 29-32)
In July 1944, representatives of 44 nations gathered at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, (US)
to discuss and design the post-war international monetary system. After lengthy discussion
and bargains, representatives succeeded in drafting and signing the Articles of Agreement of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which constitutes the core of the Bretton Woods
system. The agreement was subsequently ratified by the majority of countries to launch the
IMF in 1945. The IMF embodied an explicit set of rules about the conduct of international
monetary policies and was responsible for enforcing these rules. Delegates also created a
sister institution, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), better
known as word bank, that was chiefly responsible for financing individual development
projects.
System economizes on gold because countries can use not only gold but also foreign
exchanges as an international means of payment.
Individual countries can earn interest on their foreign exchange holdings, whereas
gold holdings yield no returns.
In addition countries can save transactions costs associated with transporting gold
across countries under the gold exchange system.
Professor Robert Triffin warned, however, that the dollar based gold exchange system
was programmed to collapse in the long run. To satisfy the growing needs for
reserves, the United States had to run balance of payments deficits contentiously. It
would eventually impair the public confidence on the dollar, if such deficits are large
and persistent, they can lead to a crisis. This dilemma, known as ‘Triffin paradox’ was
indeed responsible for the eventual collapse of the dollar-based gold exchanged
system in the early 1970s.
Economic growth
Globalization
Price stability ?
Output stability ?
Policy flexibility X
Mutual beneficial ?
Self regulating X
The flexible exchange rate regime that followed the demise of the Bretton Woods system was
ratified after the fact in January 1976 when the IMF members met in Jamaica and agreed to a
new set of rules for the international monetary system. The key elements of Jamaica
agreement include.
Flexible exchange rates were declared acceptable to the IMF members, and central
banks were allowed to intervene in the exchange markets to iron out unwarranted
volatilities.
Exchange rate regime: It is the way an authority manages its currency in relation to other
currencies and the foreign exchange market. The collapse of bretton wood system and oil
crisis of 1970 floating exchange rate system was adopted by leading industrialized countries.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) classifies member countries into seven
categories according to the exchange rate regime they have adopted. The exchange rate
arrangements under these categories are briefly described below. The information sourced
from IMF’s publication titled “Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange
Restrictions 2006”.
- Fiscal policy
- Liberal trade and investment regime
- Flexible labour market
- Strong banking system
- Preparation for EU membership
- Flexibility
- Reminding conservative financial decisions (Plan what you want to do with
your money)
- Reducing cost and price pressure of the government
- More reserves in the financial system
- Close cooperation with supervisions
- High liquidity
Conventional fixed peg arrangements/Fixed exchange rate: This is identical to
Bretton Woods system where a country pegs its currency to another or to a basket of
currencies with a band of variation not exceeding + 1% around the central parity. The
peg is adjustable at the discretion of the domestic authorities.
Example: 49 IMF member countries had this regime as of 2006. Of these 44 countries
had pegged their currencies to a single currency and the rest to a basket.
Merits
Provide stability in international trade
Reduce risk for commercial transactions
Exporter would know how much he is going to receive
Demerits
This system is speculation
Pegged exchange rates with horizontal bands: Here there is a peg but a variation is
permitted within wider bands. It can be interpreted as a sort of compromise between a
fixed and a floating exchange rate.
Example: Six countries had such wider band regimes in 2006.
Crawling Peg: This is another variant of a limited flexibility regime. The currency is
pegged to another currency or a basket but the peg is periodically adjusted. The
adjustments may be pre-announced and according to a well specified criterion or
discretionary in response to changes in selected qualitative indicators such as inflation
rate differentials.
Example: Five countries were under such a regime in 2006.
As of July 2005, a large number of countries (36), including Australia, Canada, Japan, United
Kingdom, and the United States, allow their currencies to float independently against other
currencies; the exchange rates of these countries are essentially determined by market forces.
Fifty (50) countries, including China, India, Russia and Singapore adopt some forms of
‘managed floating’ system that combines market forces and government intervention in
setting the exchange rates. In contrast, 41 countries do not have their own national currencies.
Example: 14 Central and western African countries jointly use the CFA-franc, seven
countries including Bulgaria, Hong Kong, and Estonia, on other hand maintain national
currencies but they are permanently fixed to such hard currencies as the U.S. dollar or euro.
The remaining countries adopt a mixture of fixed and floating exchange rate regimes.
According to the Smithsonian agreement, which was signed in December 1971, the band of
exchange rate movements was expanded from the original plus or minus 1 percent to plus or
minus 2.25 percent. Members of European Economic Community (EEC), however, decided
on a narrower band of + 1.25 percent for their currencies. this scaled –down, European
version of the fixed exchange rate system that arose concurrently with the decline of the
Bretton Woods system was called the ‘snake’. The name ‘snake’ was derived from the way
the EEC currencies moved closely together within the wider band allowed for other
currencies like the dollar. The ‘snake’ arrangement was replaced by the European Monetary
System (EMS) in 1979. The EMS, which was originally proposed by German Chancellor
Helmut Schmidt, was formally launched in March 1979.
Objectives of EMS
Features of EMS
Evaluation of EMU
Reference:https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/finance/asian-
financial-crisis/
The Asian Financial Crisis is a crisis caused by the collapse of the currency exchange rate
and hot money bubble. It started in Thailand in July 1997 and swept over East and Southeast
Asia. The financial crisis heavily damaged currency values, stock markets, and other asset
prices in many East and Southeast Asian countries.
Two weeks later, the Philippian peso and Indonesian rupiah underwent major devaluations as
well. The crisis spread internationally, and Asian stock markets plunged to their multi-year
lows in August. The capital market of South Korea maintained relatively stable until October.
However, the Korean won dropped to its new low on October 28 th, and the stock market
experienced its biggest one-day drop to that date on November 8th.
The causes of the Asian Financial Crisis are complicated and disputable. A major
cause is considered to be the collapse of the hot money bubble. During the late 1980s
and early 1990s, many Southeast Asian countries, including Thailand, Singapore,
Malaysia, Indonesia, and South Korea, achieved massive economic growth of an 8%
to 12% increase in their gross domestic product (GDP). The achievement was known
as the “Asian economic miracle.” However, a significant risk was embedded in the
achievement.
The economic developments in the countries mentioned above were mainly boosted
by export growth and foreign investment. Therefore, high interest rates and fixed
currency exchange rates (pegged to the U.S. dollar) were implemented to attract hot
money. Also, the exchange rate was pegged at a rate favorable to exporters. However,
both the capital market and corporates were left exposed to foreign exchange risk due
to the fixed currency exchange rate policy.
The countries that were most severely affected by the Asian Financial Crisis included
Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, South Korea, and the Philippines. They saw their
currency exchange rates, stock markets, and prices of other assets all plunge. The
GDPs of the affected countries even fell by double digits.
From 1996 to 1997, the nominal GDP per capita dropped by 43.2% in Indonesia,
21.2% in Thailand, 19% in Malaysia, 18.5% in South Korea, and 12.5% in the
Philippines. Hong Kong, Mainland China, Singapore, and Japan were also affected,
but less significantly.
Besides its economic impact, the Asian Financial Crisis also resulted in political
repercussions. The Prime Minister General of Thailand, Yongchaiyudh, and the
President of Indonesia, Suharto, resigned. An anti-Western sentiment was triggered,
especially against George Soros, who was blamed for triggering the crisis with large
amounts of currency speculation by some individuals.
The impact of the Asian Financial Crisis was not limited to Asia. International
investors became less willing to invest in and lend to developing countries, not only in
Asia in other areas of the world. Oil prices also fell due to the crisis. As a result, some
major mergers and acquisitions in the oil industry took place to achieve economies of
scale
One lesson that many countries learned from the financial crisis was to build up their
foreign exchange reserves to hedge against external shocks. Many Asian countries
weakened their currencies and adjusted economic structures to create a current
account surplus. The surplus can boost their foreign exchange reserves.
The Asian Financial Crisis also raised concerns about the role that a government
should play in the market. Supporters of neoliberalism promote free-market
capitalism. They considered the crisis as a result of government intervention and
crony capitalism.
The conditions that IMF set within their structural-adjustment packages also aimed to
weaken the relationship between the government and capital market in the affected
countries, and thus to promote the neoliberal model.
Thailand (Reasons)
Thailand
Indonesia
South Korea
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Philippines
China
India
Taiwan
Singapore
Vietnam
Measures
Countries currency exchange rated per U.S $ during Asian currency crisis
NOTE
Capital flights: Capital flight is a large-scale exodus of financial assets and capital
from a nation due to events such as political or economic instability,
currency devaluation or the imposition of capital controls.
Economic nationalism: Economic nationalism, also called economic
patriotism and economic populism, is an ideology that favors state
interventionism over other market mechanisms, with policies such as domestic control
of the economy, labor, and capital formation, including if this requires the imposition
of tariffs and other restrictions on the movement of labor, goods and capital.
Hyperinflation: Hyperinflation is a term to describe rapid, excessive, and out-of-
control general price increases in an economy.
India's current quota in the IMF is SDR (Special Drawing Rights) 5,821.5 million,
making it the 13th largest quota holding country at IMF and giving it shareholdings of
2.44%.
Inconvertibility of rupee: Those were the days of restriction on foreign exchange.
No one could keep foreign exchange without the knowledge and due permission of
RBI. The exchange control consisted of restrictions on the purchase and sale of
foreign exchange by general public and payments to and from non-residents. There
were also restrictions on the import and export of Indian currency, foreign currency
and bullion. In those times, the exchange rates used to be different than what they are
today. Today we have a market determined exchange rate system, but during those
times, RBI used to dictate its Official Exchange Rate on which Indian currency could
be converted into foreign currency and vice versa. All transactions in foreign
exchange were governed by this official rate of exchange. This means that Rupee was
inconvertible at the market rate. An importer who wanted to import from abroad was
supposed to buy dollars at the RBI dictated rates. Similarly, an exporter who just got
dollars was supposed to sell them to RBI appointed Authorize agents at RBI decided
rate. This was the inconvertibility of Rupee.