Roll No. …………………..
L–120
B. A. LL. B. (Hons.)/B. B. A. LL. B.
(Hons.)/LL. B. (Hons.) (Sixth Semester)
EXAMINATION, 2018
LAW OF EVIDENCE
Time : Three Hours
Maximum Marks : 70
Note : All questions of Part A are compulsory and each
question carries 2 marks. Attempt any two question
from each Unit of Part B. Each question carries 15
marks.
Hkkx ^v* ds lHkh iz’u vfuok;Z gSa vkSj izR;sd iz’u
2 vadksa dk gSA Hkkx ^c* dh izR;sd bdkbZ ls fdlh ,d
iz’u dk mŸkj nhft,A izR;sd iz’u 15 vadksa dk gSA
Part—A
¼Hkkx&v½
1. All relevant facts are necessarily admissible.
lHkh lqlxa r rF;ksa dk lqxzká gksuk vko’;d gSA
2. Define and illustrate ‗Conclusive Proof‘.
^fu’pk;d lcwr* dks ifjHkkf”kr dhft, vkSj mnkgj.k
nhft,A
(A-28) P. T. O.
[2] L–120
3. Oral evidence must in all cases be direct.
ekSf[kd lk{; lHkh ekeyksa esa izR;{k gksuk pkfg,A
4. ‗Estoppel is the subject of Evidence not of Equity.‘
^fcoU/k lk{; dk fo”k; gS] lkE;k dk ughaA*
5. ‗No confession made to a police officer is admissible‘.
^iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k vfHk;qDr }kjk nh xbZ laLohd`fr
vfHk;qDr ds fo#) xzká ugha gksrhA*
Part—B
¼Hkkx&c½
UNIT—1
¼bdkbZ&1½
6. Evidence may be given of fact in issue and relevant
fact. Explain it.
fook|d rF;ksa rFkk lqlxa r rF;ksa dk lk{; fn;k tk ldsxkA
O;k[;k dhft,A
Or
¼vFkok½
To what extent is conduct for a person accused of a
offence relevant ? Explain with the help of relevant
illustrations.
fdlh ,sls O;fDr dk vkpj.k ftlds fo#) vijk/k djus dk
vfHk;ksx gS] fdl lhek rd lqlxa r gS \ mnkgj.kksa dh
lgk;rk ls O;k[;k dhft,A
(A-28)
[3] L–120
UNIT—2
¼bdkbZ&2½
7. Distinguish between ‗Admission‘ and ‗Confession‘.
Discuss the relevance of confession to police officer or
in police custody.
^Lohd`r* vkSj ^laLohd`fr* esa Hksn crkb,A iqfyl vkWfQlj ls
dh x;h laLohd`fr ;k iqfyl dh vfHkj{kk esa dh x;h
laLohd`fr dh lqlxa rrk dh foospuk dhft,A
Or
¼vFkok½
What is a Dying Declaration ? When is a dying
declaration admissible in evidence ? Can a dying
declaration be admitted in evidence even if the person
making it chances to survive ?
ße`R;qdkyhu ?kks”k.kkÞ D;k gS \ lk{; eas e`R;qdkyhu ?kks”k.kk
dc xzká gksrh gS \ D;k ,d e`R;qdkyhu ?kks”k.kk lk{; esa
ml fLFkfr esa Hkh xzká gks ldrh gS tcfd ?kks”k.kk djus okys
O;fDr dks thfor jgus dh lEHkkouk gks \
UNIT—3
¼bdkbZ&3½
8. Explain Secondary Evidence. Discuss the
circumstances in which it is admissible. What is
evidentiary value of secondary evidence ?
f}rh;d lk{; dh foospuk dhft,A mu ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh
O;k[;k dhft, ftlesa ,sls lk{; xzká gSaA f}rh;d lk{; ds
lkf{;d egRo D;k gSa \
(A-28) P. T. O.
[4] L–120
Or
¼vFkok½
Explain fully the rule ―Oral evidence must in all cases;
be direct.‖ Illustrate your answer. Are there any
exception to this rule ?
ßekSf[kd lk{; lHkh n’kkvksa esa izR;{k gksuk vko’;d gSAÞ
bl fu;e dh iw.kZ O;k[;k dhft,A mnkgj.k lfgr mŸkj
nhft,A D;k bl fu;e ds dksbZ viokn Hkh gaS \
UNIT—4
¼bdkbZ&4½
9. Define ―Privileged Communication‖. State provision
of Indian Evidence Act on it.
A client says to his attorney, ‗I have committed forgery
and I wish you to defend me.‘ Is this communication
protected from disclosure ?
ßfo’ks”kkf/kdkj lalwpukÞ dh ifjHkk”kk nhft,A blls lEcfU/kr
Hkkjrh; lk{; vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dks crkb,A
^v* vius odhy ls dgrk gS] ßeSaus tkylkth dh gS vkSj eSa
pkgrk gw¡ vki esjh izfrj{kk djsAa * D;k ;g lalwpuk
izdVhdj.k ls lajf{kr gS \
Or
¼vFkok½
Define ‗Burden of Proof‘. What is its importance ?
What are the presumptions in case of abatement of
suicide by a married woman and dowery deaths ?
^lcwr dk Hkkj* dh ifjHkk”kk nhft,A bldk D;k egRo gS \
fookfgr efgyk }kjk vkRe Nk;k dh nq”izsj.kk ,oa ngst e`R;q
ds ekeyksa eas D;k mi/kkj.kk;sa gksrh gSa \
L–120 390
(A-28)
