Unit 1
Unit 1
HR analytics is the process of collecting and analyzing Human Resource (HR) data in
order to improve an organization’s workforce performance. The process can also be
referred to as talent analytics, people analytics, or even workforce analytics.
This method of data analysis takes data that is routinely collected by HR and correlates
it to HR and organizational objectives. Doing so provides measured evidence of how
HR initiatives are contributing to the organization’s goals and strategies.
HR analytics provides data-backed insight on what is working well and what is not so
that organizations can make improvements and plan more effectively for the future.
   ● Productivity
   ● Engagement
   ● Retention
Implementation
   ● Create a plan. Determine the business issues to focus on, ranking the
      most pressing ones first. Include a detailed breakdown of the HR
      functions and how to adjust them to improve the business problems.
      Identify metrics to use that will promote results and elevate HR functions
      to reach long-term goals.
   ● Involve data scientists. Welcoming data scientists into the process
      enhances HR analytics immensely. Data scientists can monitor the
      quality and accuracy of the data and help HR professionals implement
      the data to their benefit; using the information to prove a point or
      support a game plan is a crucial aspect of HR analytics. Furthermore,
      data scientists can coach and instruct employees through the nuances
      of the HR analytics process.
   ● Prepare HR personnel. Request that HR personnel evaluates the
      current analytics level of the company. Once they cultivate an
      awareness of their standing and determine what they need to do to
      reach the next level, they can take steps to progress.
   ● Educate HR professionals. Analytics brings an abundance of AI that
      challenges the status quo at work, so HR professionals must equip
      themselves with the knowledge to ride the oncoming tech waves. HR
      leaders can help HR generalists and business partners adapt to the
      digital transformation by facilitating their analytics education. In this way,
      employees can gradually acclimate to the rise of analytics in the work
      culture.
   ● Ensure legal compliance. Explain the legal guidelines to managers,
      executives, and HR personnel to avoid breaching employees’ rights and
      privacy. It’s crucial to behave with transparency concerning the type and
      amount of data that the company collects. HR leaders should consult a
      specialist in employment law to assist them in following regulations and
      implementing bylaws.
Evolution
1. 1978
An article titled ‘The measurement imperative’ proposed the idea of measuring the
impact of HR activities with collected data on the bottom line of the business. The
proposed activities included staff retention, staffing, compensation, competency
development, etc.
The idea marks the beginning of the data capturing activity in HRM and its application in
organizations.
2. 1990
With growing development in the field of and HR measurement integration with more
business dimensions, the predictive and assessment models became a subject of study.
But still, the field of HR analytics remained unknown to many organizations and they
couldn’t realize its potential.
3. 2000
The emergence of HR accounting and utility analysis was witnessed and this added
new dimension and measurement data to quantify HR. Researchers not only drew the
inference from business firms but from other sources too. One such research is on the
metric model adopted by Billy Beane, the general manager of the USA baseball team to
select team members.
The study led to a breakthrough metric-based selection model development called as
‘Moneyball’ concept in 2003 and found its adoption at large scale by organizations since
2006.
Early Adopters
Though HR Analytics found its growth by late 2000, many organizations were still
confused with its adoption and its implementation. Some known MNCs were able to
foresee its potential of HR analytics and its benefits to the organization and took
initiatives to deep dive into this field.
1. Google
In 2009, Google started ‘Project Oxygen’ to find the qualities and attributes of an
effective manager. The project gained global recognition in 2011 when it published the
data-based findings and was found to very relevant and effective across different
industries.
The success of the project boosted research regarding the benefits of analytics in
workforce management. Around 20 articles were published on topics of Talent and
workforce analytics by Harvard Business Review, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Fortune
magazines, etc.
The articles not only supported the application of analytics in workforce management
but also found some shortcomings of the ‘Project Oxygen’ like positive co-relation
between academic grades and employee performance. But ‘Project Oxygen’ laid the
foundation for a dynamic shift from traditional metrics-based HR measurement to
Predictive analysis of HR analytics.
2. IBM
IBM acquired an employment and retention service company, Kenexa in 2012. With its
cloud-based solutions combined with Oracle, Tableau, and SAP, IBM discovered ways
for talent management by analyzing the voluminous big data of HR.
Potential Realized
   1. Microsoft
Microsoft found the employee attrition as a major challenge across its various business
units. It deployed HR analytics tools to generate a statistical profile of employees who
were likely to leave the organizations.
The company found that majority of these profiles were of the direct college hires and
those who had not been promoted even after being with the company for 3 years.
These insights allowed Microsoft to take several HR interventions like the assignment of
mentors, changes in stock vesting, and income hikes to better manage the employee
and control attrition.
2. Mindtree
   ●   Employee Turnover
   ●   Risk assessment
   ●   Profile management
   ●   Productivity index
With HR analytic tools, Mindtree can predict employee turnover for the next 90 days
from employee data. This has enabled them to generate insights from data analysis and
fed those insights into forecasting models for employee hiring.
Using analytic tools, HR also manages high-risk employees and uses the data to make
better management decisions.
ConAgra Foods Inc. saw many of its key employees leaving the organization. The
company then deployed predictive analytics software to predict the likeliness of an
employee leaving the organization. With this data, the company then created a model to
identify the factors behind employee attrition, and around 200 factors were fed into the
model.
The analysis reflected that pay isn’t among the top 10 significant factors contributing to
employee attrition while it is internal recognition that is having a high correlation with
employee attrition.
   4. Wipro Ltd.
Wipro is using HR analytics to boost employee retention and combined with social
media analytics, it is also finding new skills and talent through Human Capital
Management. With labor mobility, Wipro has transitioned from a cloud-based oracle
system to its own Wipro HR sprinter for augmenting talent management. Using this HR
analytics software, Wipro can see the trends of each employee, the data of employees,
and their predicted behavior with just a click.
The field of Human Resource Management has been continuously evolving and
the HR in today’s scenario is playing a strategic role than merely a support system.
Human Resource function primarily deals with the employees, employers and all
the people who are related with the organization. It is designed to improve
employee productivity, performance and align the workforce with the business.
The HRM functions in an organization deals with people related issues like
Recruitment & Selection, Compensation, General Administration, Employee
Welfare and Involvement, Communication, Organizational Development,
Performance Management, Employee Motivation, Rewards & Recognitions and
Training & Development.
HRIS or Human Resource Information System, is a customized software solution
designed for helping the organizations to automate and manage their HR,
payroll, management and accounting activities. HRIS affects the performance of
the people, processes and key organizational strategies by automating key HR
processes like recruitment, training, manpower planning, performance appraisal
and job analysis & design.
According to Parry (2010), HRIS can serve as a vital strategic tool as it shares
crucial data with the management related with recruitment and retention
strategies which can be aligned with the overall corporate strategy for realizing the
organizational objectives of growth. Additionally, by using HR applications, a
company can calculate the overall costs incurred per employee and it’s effects on
the business as a whole (DeSanctis, 1986).
Historical data reveals that the evolution of HRIS can be traced back in 1950’s and
1960’s when the first automated systems (payroll system) was introduced
(Martinsons 1997). Kavanagh et al. (1990) shared their insights on historical
evolution of HRIS by introducing the historical eras in human resource from the
pre-World War II period to the 1980s and how the evolving HR practices had its
effect on the HRIS.
Recruiting. Recruiting data gathered from the Applicant Tracking System (ATS) is the
first common data source in the HRIS. This includes the number of candidates who
applied, their CVs and other characteristics, as well as data about the recruitment
funnel, recruitment sources, selection, and so on. This system is the most common
input for recruiting metrics.
Demographic data. Another key data source is HRIS employee records. This includes
the employee ID, name, gender, date of birth, residence, position, department, cost
center specifications, termination date, and so on. These demographic data are often
included in an analysis as control variables. Also, when data is combined manually, this
is often the database that is enriched with data from other systems by matching the
employee’s ID as a unique identifier.
Job architecture. Job architecture, also referred to as global grading or job leveling, is
a framework that serves as a foundation for remuneration. Different roles are put into
salary scales that have bands and grades with maximum reward levels. Different roles
apply to different salary scale levels.
Succession planning. Succession planning schemes are also part of the HRIS. The
amount of data depends on the maturity of the organization’s succession planning
practices. Example data includes leadership development data, managerial bench
strength, and data about which people are next in line for positions.
Talent development. Talent development data is a bit of a weird one out. Talent
programs often consist of courses and workshops that are often included in the learning
management system. However, the broader approach to developing talent is another
key piece of information that can be retrieved from the HRIS.
Exit interview. Depending on the organization, exit interview information may also be
stored in the HRIS. This provides information on the reasons why employees have left
the organization. This data can be used for analyses aimed at reducing employee
turnover.
Metrics help compare different data points. For example, if turnover was 5% last year
and is now 7.5%, it has increased by 50%. The former are data points, the latter is the
metric.
Metrics don´t say anything about a cause, they just measure the difference between
numbers.
HR metrics are indicators that enable HR to track and measure performance on different
aspects and ultimately predict the future. However, not all HR metrics are created equal.
Now you have a basic understanding of the difference between metrics and analytics,
we’ll finish with how to get from metrics to analytics.
   ● Start with your data: As you know now, metrics are the relations
      between data points. In order to start with metrics, you need to have
      your data right. Smart HR system design and high data quality are key
      components to improve before you invest into getting your metrics ready
      for HR reporting
   ● Getting the metrics right: This step sounds easier than it is. Measuring
      basic data is easy but keeping track of more complicated metrics, like
      the % of unwanted turnover, is something a lot of companies are
      struggling with, as it requires them to combine multiple systems (their
      main HRIS and their performance system in this case).
   ● Select the relevant KPIs: The second step is to select the HR Key
      Performance Indicators that matter most for your business. These KPIs
      should be connected to business goals. For each KPI a target score
      should be specified.
   ● Identify areas where analytics adds value: You can leverage the data
      and metrics to add value using analytics. This starts by identifying a
      business case that, when solved, would add value to the business. This
      means that your outcomes need to be actionable.
   ● Implementation of results: Once you’ve completed your first analytics
      project, you can implement the results in the organization. At this point,
      you’ve leveraged your HR data to create value for the organization and
      you’ve added to the organization’s strategic goals.
Example:
An important metric for recruitment is the ‘time to hire’. This measures the number of
days between a candidate applying for a job, and them accepting a job offer. Time to
hire gives insights into recruiting efficiency and candidate experience.
Like the time to hire, the ‘cost per hire (CPH)’ metric shows how much it costs the
company to hire new employees. This also serves as an indicator of the efficiency of the
recruitment process.
Cost per hire can be time-consuming to work out. There used to be a huge variation in
how companies calculated this metric until The Society of Human Resource
Management and the American National Standards Institute agreed on a standard
formula.
This metric shows the efficiency of the organization as a whole. The ‘revenue per
employee’ metric is an indicator of the quality of hired employees.
Engagement Rating
On the other hand, the intuitive style of thinking is driven more by gut-feel and
confidence derived from experience. It does not follow a prescribed set of analytical
steps, but draws on observed indicators and trends from the internal and external
organisation environment to reach strategic decisions. Since specific explicitly available
formulae are not followed, it relies on the individual’s ability developing their own
internal modes of making sense of strategic issues.
There are advantages attributable to these different styles of thinking. For instance, an
analytical approach to a certain matter will normally be open and allow objective
contribution of multiple individuals allowing them to work together based on a commonly
understood model or framework. An intuitive approach is normally fast and efficient. It
relies on the mental and experiential capacity to read meanings into observed patterns
and derive solutions very quickly.
Of course, there are flip sides to these advantages, and the downsides to each
approach are often easy to observe. When faced with complex problems, analytical
approaches often breakdown, unable to cope with the range and levels of variables.
The reliance on models also means that it requires specialist knowledge, e.g. the
understanding and use of the Black-Scholes model for real options valuation.
Intuitive approaches are very individual, and rely on tacit knowledge that is not often
easy to share. Bringing others on board to agree on a decision often would rely on the
power of persuasion, and sometimes the making links between influencing factors that
stakeholders may find tenuous and difficult to accept. Decisions can very easily be seen
as subjective or, worse, political in nature.
Intuition is said to be that inspirational “aha” moment of thought, before your rational
mind kicks in, which ultimately sabotages the true message.
Old people are great intuitive thinkers thanks to their years of life. But I will not rely
solely on them to make decisions for the present and future. Rather, I prefer to
approach the decision strategically, using the intuitions of the seniors as a valuable
input only.
Analytics frameworks like LAMP
People analytics is helping HR shape their strategies in regard to hiring, training, and
employee management to help create a solid, stronger workforce. But HR is one of the
last business departments to start fully embracing data analytics. Most organizations
with departments that use analytics are using it to increase their customer engagement
and grow their sales numbers, like marketing, customer service, and sales teams.
Accounting and finance departments often use them to help identify trends that can be
applied to business strategy.
Businesses are starting to understand how analytics can improve their HR processes
and ultimately help them improve their business. While HR analytics aren’t
customer-focused, they are people-focused and can help HR better hire, manage, and
support the people who will help shape the organization and grow it towards its goals.
Building an HR analytics framework, however, is the first step to being able to apply and
use analytics in your HR endeavors. Here are several steps to take to begin or improve
your HR analytics journey.
Predictive data analytics are everywhere. It is in its essence a technology that learns
from existing data, and it uses this to forecast individual behavior. This means that
predictions are very specific. In the movie Moneyball, predictive analytics were used to
predict the potential success of individual baseball players.
HR analytics: HR analytics specifically deals with the metrics of the HR function, such
as time to hire, training expense per employee, and time until promotion. All these
metrics are managed exclusively by HR for HR. People analytics: People analytics,
though comfortably used as a synonym for HR analytics, is technically applicable to
“people” in general. It can encompass any group of individuals even outside the
organization. For instance, the term “people analytics” may be applied to analytics about
the customers of an organization and not necessarily only employees. Workforce
analytics: Workforce analytics is an all-encompassing term referring specifically to
employees of an organization. It includes on-site employees, remote employees, gig
workers, freelancers, consultants, and any other individuals working in various
capacities in an organization.
Logic
This is the step that helps companies to know where to look for insight and connect data
points to meaning in order to make better decisions. The connection between the
numbers and effects and outcomes is vital in understanding the “why”. Are there
connections between employee health and wellness and employee turnover, for
instance? Where are the connections in your business practices and your employee
performance? This what the logic step of an HR analytics framework can help you
understand. IT notes that “This framework depicts the connections between HR and
management practices, which affect employee attitudes, engagement, and turnover,
which then affect the experiences of customers, which affect customer-buying behavior,
which affects sales, which affect profits.” Companies who are able to understand the
connections between their HR practices and people’s issues and how they impact the
business are the most successful in implementing changes that matter. Analytics helps
to highlight the connections.
Measures
Good analytics systems built from a solid framework help make sure what you’re
measuring is meaningful to your specific organization and business needs. It also helps
make sure that what you’re measuring is accurate and meaningful data. Inform IT notes,
“Factors such as employee turnover, performance, engagement, learning, and absence
are not equally important everywhere. That means measurements like these should
focus precisely on what matters. If turnover is a risk due to the loss of key capabilities,
turnover rates should be stratified to distinguish employees with such skills from others.
If the absence has the most effect in call centers with tight schedules, this should be
very clear in how we measure absenteeism. Lacking a common logic about how
turnover affects business or strategic success, well-meaning managers draw
conclusions that might be misguided or dangerous, such as the assumption that
turnover or engagement have similar effects across all jobs.” It’s important to know why
you’re measuring what you’re measuring and understand accurately how it affects your
business.
Analytics
Analytics is really how data can provide answers. You may have data that suggests that
your employees are engaged in their work based on employee feedback surveys; you
may also have customer surveys that indicate they are satisfied with their interactions
with your brand. You may believe that more engaged employees work in a way that
produces higher customer satisfaction and more loyalty. That may very well be true, but
analytics software and systems will help you identify the relationship and let you draw
more accurate insights. Analytics allows you to dig deeper with a more holistic
approach. It reveals the right conclusions from the data and transforms information into
relevant, meaningful knowledge.
Process
The approach to data in HR is the key to solving people problems. It also helps
meaningful data and analysis from that data in front of business leaders who can
actually affect and support needed changes. IT says that leader needs to “buy into the
idea that human capital decisions have tangible monetary effects, they may be more
receptive to greater sophistication” and other changes to their employee performance
management that are needed to help support business success.
HR Scorecard
Human Resources or HR was viewed as a support function whose primary role was to
take care of payroll, time tracking, and disputes between the unions and the
organizations.
Indeed, in the manufacturing era, the term used for HR functions was personnel
management and industrial relations wherein the job of the personnel manager was to
ensure that salaries are paid on time, mediating between the unions and the
organizations, and otherwise being peripheral to the other functions such as production,
operations, sales and marketing, and strategy formulation.
It was only with the advent of the services sector that the role of the erstwhile personnel
manager transformed into “human resources” management and later on, to people
management and people enabling and people empowerment.
Note the emphasis on resources and people as the services sector relies on human
capital as the key asset and hence, the HR managers were expected to contribute to
strategic goals and objectives.
In other words, the HR function evolved and transformed into one where it was no
longer peripheral or a support function, and instead of times when human resources are
viewed as sources of sustainable strategic advantage, the role of the HR manager was
to aid and enable such resources to contribute effectively and meaningfully to the
organizational strategies.
In other words, HR now was expected to align its recruitment, compensation, and
employee retention strategies to the organizational strategies.
What this means is that in contemporary organizations, the HR managers have a “seat
at the leadership table” or to put it simply, they have to be aligned with the larger
organizational strategies.
Towards this end, the HR Scorecard works by providing decision-makers with data and
inputs about how much the employee recruitment and retention processes cost and
what are the benefits of the same.
For much of the 20th century, it was commonly understood that these costs are part of
the overall organizational costs and there was no way to measure the benefits of such
expenses in “tangible” ways.
In other words, what this means is that an HR Scorecard provides the organizational
leaders with metrics and data in tangible terms about the payoffs and the benefits from
HR processes and activities.
Benefits of HR Scorecards
The key benefit or the relevance of tools such as HR Scorecards is that it aligns the
broader organizational strategies with the HR strategies and the convergence of
organizational goals with the HR goals brings the HR function in line and tune with the
overall organizational ecosystem.
For instance, how this works in the real world is that if an organization identifies
superlative customer service as a strategic goal, the HR scorecard helps in measuring
the benefits of initiatives such as training the customer service representatives and the
associated staff costs involved in hiring and retaining such key personnel.
At the end of the year, the benefits of the initiatives as measured by customer feedback
surveys are tallied to the costs of the initiatives so that organizational decision makers
and more importantly, the HR Managers have an idea about the effectiveness and
efficacy of their hiring and retention strategies and their usefulness and relevance to the
broader organizational goals and objectives.
In other words, the HR function is no longer a “silo” that stands apart in “splendid
isolation” and is instead, aligned with the overall organizational ecosystem of goals and
objectives.
The premise for an HR scorecard is that HR can and should develop metrics to
demonstrate how HR activities impact profitability:
   ● The first element is what we called Workforce Success. It asks: Has the
      workforce accomplished the key strategic objectives for the business?
   ● The second element is we called Right HR Costs. It asks: Is our total
      investment in the workforce (not just the HR function) appropriate (not
      just minimized)?
   ● The third element we describe as Right Types of HR Alignment. It asks:
      Are our HR practices aligned with the business strategy and
      differentiated across positions, where appropriate?
   ● The fourth element is Right HR Practices. It asks: Have we designed
      and implemented world class HR management policies and practices
      throughout the business?
   ● The fifth element is Right HR Professionals. It asks: Do our HR
      professionals have the skills they need to design and implement a
      world-class HR management system?
Scorecards include current data and comparisons to previous time periods, such as the
previous quarter or year, and historical data to show improvements toward goals.
Costs
Human resources costs that are measured and reported on through scorecards include
adherence to budgets, recruiting costs to attract and hire staff and costs of benefits
such as group health insurance. Tracking costs through scorecards enables managers
to plan human resources goals and expenditures and control costs in specific areas and
set realistic budgets.
Hiring
Turnover
Turnover is the rate at which a company gains and loses employees and is commonly
compared to the rate of industry turnover. Turnover costs companies money to recruit
staff and in lost productivity and low morale amongst other employees. High employee
turnover indicates employees are unhappy due to issues such as work environment,
lack of opportunities, management conflict or compensation. Low employee turnover
indicates employee satisfaction, making lowering turnover a significant goal.
Workforce Scorecard
The Workforce Scorecard is a component of a larger company-wide scorecard that
facilitates the measurement and communication of human resources objectives and
performance across the enterprise. Following the basic tenets of scorecard theory, KPIs
within the Workforce Scorecard are used to evaluate how well employees are carrying
out the internal initiatives necessary to serve their customers, how those initiatives are
associated with the financial and strategic goals of the organization, and how efficiently
and effectively all employees in the organization are performing. Used in this manner as
an organizational and communications tool, the Workforce Scorecard supports the shift
of the human resources function from an administrative entity to a key strategic partner.
The Workforce Scorecard argues that to maximize the strategic contribution of the
workforce, organizations must meet three challenges: view their workforce in terms of
its potential contribution rather than as a cost to be minimized (the perspective
challenge); replace benchmarking metrics with measures that differentiate levels of
strategic impact (the metrics challenge); and hold line managers and HR professionals
jointly responsible for workforce quality and strategy execution (the execution
challenge).
To make this happen, our main thesis in The Workforce Scorecard is that managers and
leaders need a strategy for the business, a strategy for the workforce, and a strategy for
the HR function. As a result, they also need a series of metrics and measures for each;
a balanced scorecard, a workforce scorecard, and an HR scorecard, respectively.
Designing such a system begins with a clear understanding of the unique processes
through which the workforce creates value in each business. The Workforce Scorecard
offers a framework that identifies and measures the outcomes, behaviors,
competencies, mind-set, and culture required for workforce success and reveals how
each dimension impacts the bottom line. The lynchpin of this perspective is an
emphasis on looking at the role of human capital from the “outside in” (or customer
back), not from the “inside out” (starting with the HR function).
Integrations
The Workforce Scorecard works in conjunction with Scorecard and the Workforce Data
Mart. The Workforce Scorecard uses Scorecard’s tools to provide a current
representation of how the company is meeting its human resources objectives. The
Workforce Data Mart provides details and analysis of how and why these trends are
occurring.