Scribd
Upload
10 views2 pages

Affidavit

This document is an affidavit submitted by Ramesh Chandra Gupta, a petitioner in a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India. It outlines his acknowledgment of the facts of the case, his denial of certain claims made in the petition, and the verification of the affidavit's contents. The affidavit also states that no other petitions have been filed by the petitioners regarding the same judgment.

Uploaded by

dineshdharamdasani123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views2 pages

Affidavit

This document is an affidavit submitted by Ramesh Chandra Gupta, a petitioner in a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India. It outlines his acknowledgment of the facts of the case, his denial of certain claims made in the petition, and the verification of the affidavit's contents. The affidavit also states that no other petitions have been filed by the petitioners regarding the same judgment.

Uploaded by

dineshdharamdasani123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

CA-3

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA


CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. ________ OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF:


SHYAM SUNDAR SINGH & ORS. ….…Petitioners
VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. & ORS ...... Respondents

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ramesh Chandra Gupta, S/o Raja Ram Gupta, aged 71 years, R/o
– 1499, Jankipuram, Civil Lines, Jhansi, U.P. presently at Jhansi do
hereby state as follows: -
1. That I am petitioner no. 5 in the present Special Leave Petition
and as such I am fully conversant with the facts and
circumstances of the case. On behalf of all the other
petitioners in this matter, I am competent to swear this
affidavit.
That the contents of the accompanying Special Leave Petition
consisting of paragraph 1 to 8 from pages accompanied with
Synopsis and List of Dates at Pages B to Y and IAs has been
read over to me in vernacular language I say that same are true
and correct and nothing material information has been
concealed therefrom.
2. That the contents of para 3 of the petition are not admitted
(excluded the annexure) as stated hence are denied and it is
stated in reply to this, that the petitioner was given notice on
31.05.1995 for depositing the remaining amount 3/4 E
38,55,115.30/- but the petitioner neither deposited the rest
amount nor took any bid in respect of the notice dt.
31.05.1995 it has been informed to me that the petitioner
deposited only 1/4 i.e., RS. 20,25,136.00/-on the auction date
04th of February.
3. That the Annexures P-1 to P-38 are translated copies of their
respective originals.
4. That no other Special Leave Petition has been filed by the
Petitioners against the impugned judgment and final order
before this Hon’ble Court.

DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
I, the above name deponent do hereby verify that the contents of the above
affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and
nothing material information has been concealed therefrom.

Verified at Jhansi on this 14th day of July, 2023.


DEPONENT

Find out the mistakes and submit the correct copy of the
affidavit (5 Marks)

You might also like