0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views16 pages

Three Colours Worldview

The document provides an executive summary of the Three Colors of Worldview Assessment, which categorizes worldviews into Innocence/Guilt, Honor/Shame, and Power/Fear. It explains how these worldviews influence individual behavior and interactions in intercultural contexts. The assessment results for an individual named Rip Robinson indicate that all three worldviews are of equal importance in his perspective, suggesting a balanced approach to understanding and interacting with diverse cultural drivers.

Uploaded by

mencey72
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views16 pages

Three Colours Worldview

The document provides an executive summary of the Three Colors of Worldview Assessment, which categorizes worldviews into Innocence/Guilt, Honor/Shame, and Power/Fear. It explains how these worldviews influence individual behavior and interactions in intercultural contexts. The assessment results for an individual named Rip Robinson indicate that all three worldviews are of equal importance in his perspective, suggesting a balanced approach to understanding and interacting with diverse cultural drivers.

Uploaded by

mencey72
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Three Colors of Worldview

Ahmed
Report for: Rip Newcastle
Robinson

Date of Report: 01 Feb 2017

Report Version: 1.7

This is an Executive Summary of your Three Colors of Worldview Assessment. For more information
about the Three Colors of Worldview and your assessment, please go to My KnowledgeWorkx and
log in with your username and password.

Version 1.7. Copyright 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE. All rights reserved.


Three Colors of Worldview

Contents
Three Colors of Worldview Report, Executive Summary

1. Introduction
1.1 The Worldviews in a Nutshell

1.2 Example

2. Your worldview Discovery Tool Results

3. Three Colors of Worldview In-Depth


1.1 What is a Worldview?

3.2 The Innocence-Guilt Worldview

3.3 The Honor-Shame Worldview

3.4 The Power-Fear Worldview

3.5 Primary and Secondary Worldviews

4. Relating to People with Other Worldviews


4.1 Living Out the Strength of My Worldview

4.2 Interacting with a Person with a Primary I/G Worldview

4.3 Interacting with a Person with a Primary H/S Worldview

4.4 Interacting with a Person with a Primary P/F Worldview

5. Insights and Actions


5.1 My Steps

5.2 What's Next?

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 1


Three Colors of Worldview

1. Introduction
The Three Colors of Worldview© is a excellent starting point when analyzing intercultural
situations. They are quick to remember and provide an easy, flexible framework through which to
understand what is going on in the intercultural world around you. The Three Colors of
Worldview© get at the culturally driven motivators and demotivators by pointing to underlying
beliefs and assumptions.

1.1 The Worldviews in a Nutshell

A 'worldview' is a person's way of viewing the world. Everyone looks at the world through
colored lenses which affect how they interpret other people's actions and how to respond
to them. One person's worldview lens may be different from another, leading them to
interpret and respond differently in the same situation.

Like computer displays that create all the different colors you are seeing by mixing red,
green and blue, the three paradigms that together form your worldview are
Innocence/Guilt, Honor/Shame, and Power/Fear. They drive our interpretations and
responses to the world around us and each person's worldview is a different mix of these
drivers.

Innocence/Guilt
In an Innocence/Guilt focused culture, education focuses on deductive reasoning, cause
and effect, critical analysis and the ability to formulate and engage good questions. Issues
are often seen through the lens of predefined standards. Written contracts are paramount.
Communication tends to be more direct, and could be perceived as insensitive.

Honor/Shame
Societies with a predominantly Honor/Shame worldview teach children to make honorable
choices according to the situations they find themselves in. Communication, interpersonal
interaction, and business dealings are very relationship-driven, with every interaction having
an effect on the Honor/Shame status of the participants. Often it is not just about the
individual but more about the honor/shame status of the family/group/tribe/team they
belong to.

Power/Fear
Those with a Power/Fear worldview raise children to develop their ability to assess and
navigate hierarchical systems and adjust their behavior to increase their position of power
and influence. As they grow up, they learn how to align themselves with the right people to
gain influence and power.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 2


Three Colors of Worldview

1. Introduction
1.2 Example

Suppose you are at a crowded beach. Many people are in the water, spending time there
with friends and family, and then suddenly you hear a lifeguard blow a whistle. What would
the primary reaction be?

For a person with a primary Innocence/Guilt worldview, the most important objective will
be to establish innocence of any wrong. The most logical way to do that would be to
connect with the lifeguard to see at what or whom he was blowing the whistle. Once
innocence is established, the person returns to whatever he/she had been doing before.

A person with a primary Honor-Shame worldview (see example graph below) would likely
not even acknowledge the lifeguard at the sound of the whistle because the lifeguard's
importance is secondary to that of his/her group. What is most important is to establish
honor and to avoid shame, and your honor is connected to the group you belong to. That
person would look around at those in the group and find out if he/she is doing something
wrong; and if the group does not believe that he/she is doing something dishonorable, that
person will continue whatever he/she was doing.

For a person with a primary Power/Fear worldview the main motivation would be to
establish whether or not there is something to be afraid of and then to resolve that issue.
The lifeguard is not the focus; the lifeguard triggers the mechanism. The focus is on
establishing if there is something he/she should fear. This will be done by checking other
people and their reactions or by scanning their surroundings.

Example graph of a Primary Power/Fear Worldview

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 3


Three Colors of Worldview

2. Your worldview Discovery Tool results

Dear Rip Robinson, below is the graphical representation of your personal worldview, based on
Ahmed
the discovery tool outcome. Keep in mind that no one outcome is better than or preferred than
another. The important part is to understand your personal drivers, and to be able to quickly
assess and accurately understand and interpret the drivers of the person(s) with whom you are
interacting. Then you can modify your behavior and communication to improve the outcome of
the interaction.

Three Colors of Worldview Personal Profile for


Rip Robinson
Ahmed Newcastle

The Discovery Tool indicates that Power/Fear, Honor/Shame and Innocence/Guilt are of equal
importance in your worldview.

Every person has elements of all three worldviews and so do you. Your Personal Results show
that all three worldviews have a significant presence in your worldview and neither shows up as
significantly more dominant than the others. This could greatly help you to develop the ability to
be comfortable in and interact with each of the worldviews.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 4


Three Colors of Worldview

Please read the introductions to each of the worldviews in paragraph 3.2 to 3.4 and take note
which elements of each worldview contribute to your own worldview.

It could very well be that the I/G worldview is the primary driver in one part of society like the
school system or the legal system; and that H/S and P/F are the primary drivers in other parts of
society, like your family or tribe, the culture of the region you live in, or your work/company, etc.
As your understanding of each of the worldviews develops, you will be able to better discern this.

It could also be that you or your parents migrated across cultures and that the worldview of your
parents is different from the worldview of the society you grew up in and both had a significant
impact.

In section 4 you will find information on how to interact with people that have a different
worldview. Take note that these descriptions are for the primary drivers only. To apply them to a
person with a strong secondary driver, you will have to look at the description of both worldviews
and discern which one is at play in the current situation and interaction. In your case all these
descriptions will also give you added insight in your own worldview as all drivers have a significant
presence.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 5


Three Colors of Worldview

3. The Three Colors of Worldview In More Detail


3.1 What is a "Worldview"?

The Three Colors of Worldview© is designed to make sense out of the generic "motivators"
and "demotivators" of global societies. Roland Muller (2001), who did anthropological and
sociological research among the Bedouin, initiated this research. KnowledgeWorkx has
carried that theory further into an application for family, business, education, healthcare,
etc.

In the Inter-Cultural Intelligence Framework© we use the term worldview to bring


awareness to the colored lenses everyone uses to view the world around them. Your
worldview greatly affects how you see and interpret the actions of people around you and
how you respond to them. Your worldview is a mix of six drivers.

You will find that a person's or society's worldview is never solely based on one worldview.
Instead, worldviews are a complex mix of all drivers, yet one or two worldviews are often
dominant. As we look at our own worldview through the lens of the Three Colors of
Worldview© we recognize where our preferences come from, and we better understand the
cultural motivators and demotivators of ourselves and others.

The next step is to acquire techniques to develop responses appropriate to the context. Like
the chameleon, it involves adjusting the externals, but not changing the DNA.

Take note that the mix and application of the Three Colors of Worldview© in a society can
and often does change over time. Even within a given society you will find subgroups that
place emphasis on different Three Colors of Worldview© drivers than the rest of that
society. This can be attributed to generational gaps, regional differences, career, education
and home environments.

This shifting of the ratio between the worldview elements over time is part of the
movement of cultures within a society.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 6


Three Colors of Worldview

Using the Three Colors of Worldview©


In order to interact effectively in intercultural situations, you need to understand what
worldview you are coming from, and what worldview the other person(s) adhere to. Then
you can communicate with their worldview in mind, and you can translate the benefits of
your product or proposal from your worldview to theirs; you can move forward with
confidence that your hard work and expertise will pay off.

3.2 The Innocence/Guilt Worldview


In a Innocence/Guilt focused culture, education focuses on deductive
reasoning, cause and effect, critical analysis, and the ability to
formulate and engage with good questions. Issues are often seen
through the lens of predefined standards. Written contracts are
paramount. Communication tends to be more direct, and could be
perceived as insensitive.

Right-wrong thinking and individual accountability are very much a part of the
Innocence/Guilt Worldview. This leads to the building of a legal system where right and
wrong actions are established by law. When looking at countries like Germany, the
Netherlands, the UK or the United States, it can be noted that the legal systems are
enormous. In a Innocence/Guilt oriented society it is important to document the expected
behavior before engaging in a relationship. Contracts tend to be rigid and long, and define
the relationship rather than being an expression of the relationship.

In a society where Innocence/Guilt is a crucial driver, being right is extremely important.


Children are brought up in an educational system that will therefore reason that rights or
wrongs are established according to linear lines. The legal system inherently has a linear
nature; "If you do this, these are the consequences". Cause and effect thinking, linear
reasoning and debate form an integral part of Innocence/Guilt societies. Innocence/Guilt
worldview societies predominantly have a very direct way of communicating. Opinions or
worldviews (chosen truths) are verbalized and expressed freely.

Every one of the worldview drivers can be overused. Because of the high emphasis on
innocence, overuse in a Innocence/Guilt society is mainly evident in the area of 'creating
your own right and creating your own wrong'. As you establish your own right and your
own wrong, the balance of the Innocence/Guilt equation begins to change. Situational
ethics is a typical challenge that is driven by discussion on creating or proving 'innocence'.
People might stretch the law to the point where innocence is still ensured, irrelevant of
behavior. Or if they have enough influence in society they might even work towards finding
clauses or phrases in the law that can be reinterpreted to make an individual seem
innocent.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 7


Three Colors of Worldview

Another way that overuse manifests in Innocence/Guilt cultures is where the pursuit of
innocence becomes all consuming. One example would be that the fear of corruption,
bribes or lack of transparency has led many organizations to put elaborate systems and
processes in place to make sure they can prove that everything is done by the book.

3.3 The Honor/Shame Worldview


Children raised in an Honor/Shame environment are taught life-skills
that focus on maintaining and enhancing their honor and the honor
of their family, tribe or nation. A core skill in this is the ability to read
the context and the people in that context in order to make
honorable choices according to the situations they find themselves in.
Children are taught who is who and how they relate to the group, not
just today but also in history. People will build up a database of
historic, and relational data that help him or her know how to
navigate their environment.

Communication, interpersonal interaction, and business dealings are very relationship-


driven, with every interaction having an effect on the Honor/Shame status of the
participants. In an Honor/Shame society the crucial objective is to avoid shame and to be
viewed honorably by other people, especially the members of the group one belongs to. If
a person brings shame upon the group, usually the group, not the authorities, will deliver
the consequences.

Most Honor/Shame societies are group cultures with community accountability as a


cultural dimension. This often results in indirect communication and cautious information
sharing. The Honor/Shame worldview is especially strong in parts of Africa, South America,
Asia and the Middle East.

The challenge of this worldview is found in the overuse of honor or shame drivers. Because
the focus is on avoiding shame and establishing honor, people may want to establish honor
at all costs. The only way to do this is by hiding actions that might be deemed dishonorable
or that might cause shame. "A shame covered is a shame half redeemed", is a proverb from
an Honor/Shame culture that touches on this abuse mechanism.

3.4 The Power/Fear Worldview


Children raised in Power/Fear environments learn from an early age
to detect and recognize the power structure and hierarchy in every
setting. They learn to align themselves with the right people to
enhance their own or the power base of the family/group they are
loyal to. It differs from Honor/Shame environments because

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 8


Three Colors of Worldview

Power/Fear environments are more focused on the hierarchical


situation today and less on the historical context. Power/Fear
mechanisms are used in very positive ways to empower people in the
environment by giving boundaries or assistance in making sound
decisions. A ruler, supervisor or family leader who empowers and is
seen as benevolent will be a great asset to his or her people.

Avoiding or managing fear is crucial in the Power/Fear worldview. A child will learn at an
early age how to navigate life in a way that their choices of allegiance will result in the least
amount of fear. In most cases these choices will lead to a certain amount of fear that a
person will accept as 'part of the package'. Joining the cool group of kids at school because
you want to belong might mean being asked by the leader of the pack to do things you
don't really want to do. Saying 'No' to your supervisor because he is asking you to do
something questionable might be more dangerous than the actual thing he is asking you to
do; so you comply and do it anyway.

Unfortunately, many people in positions of power try to stay in those positions by instilling
fear in their subordinates. The balance of fear subsequently dictates how long the person
will stay in power or how much power that person will have. Examples of countries with a
Power/Fear worldview are North Korea, Zimbabwe, and Tajikistan. The balance of
Power/Fear is not only present on the political level but can exist in the social or corporate
arena. Even a household can be ruled by Power/Fear.

Power/Fear has the most obvious abuse mechanism. This is engaged by using power to
establish as much fear as possible in the people underneath, instead of using the power to
establish trust. This is why the most absolute and vicious types of dictatorship tend to be
found in the power versus fear areas of the world.

3.5 Primary and Secondary Worldviews

All societies are a complex mix of all three worldviews. Sometimes one worldview is
obviously the dominant driver while sometimes a second worldview is also (quite)
dominant. As all worldviews evolve over time, the cause of changes in the mix of drivers are
many times hard to pinpoint. In some societies, the secondary (or the primary) worldview is
a result of (past) colonialism, occupation or immigration. Other societies have one
worldview on the national level and another worldview rules responses on the smaller scale
entities like neighborhoods, schools, sports clubs or families.

What we see frequently is Power/Fear as a secondary worldview to either Innocence/Guilt


or Honor/Shame. In many cases the Power/Fear worldview is the mechanism that upholds
and enforces the values of the primary worldview. A society that operates out of a
Innocence/Guilt worldview, for instance, might have a strong and repressive law

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 9


Three Colors of Worldview

enforcement system to enforce the values of the Innocence/Guilt oriented society.


Likewise, a society that operates out of a strong Honor/Shame worldview, might have a
strong and violent "code of honor" that instills fear and enforces the Honor/Shame values of
the society. However, in case of a Innocence/Guilt oriented society, enforcement would
most likely be done by government representatives and, in case of an Honor/Shame
oriented society, enforcement would be done by members of the group.

On a personal scale you might observe the blend of a primary and a secondary worldview
with immigrants, Third Culture Kids (TCKs) and, to a lesser extent, expatriates. When the
society where the person lives has a different worldview than their family and friends more
than one worldview might be developed. This could result in positive synergize, co-
existence or clash between those worldviews in the person's thinking, speaking and acting.

In situations of extreme stress, it might happen that suddenly the secondary worldview is
the driving force for someone's behavior as that was the worldview in the deepest level of
someone's heart (iceberg) and the "primary" worldview was a convention the person
learned to adhere to, appreciate and think along.

In those cases it is crucial to have a firm understanding of all three worldviews, how the
drivers are manifesting and if the drivers are having an enabling or disabling effect on all
people involved.

4. Relating to people with another Worldview


There is no rulebook for interacting with people with a different worldview than yours (or for
interacting with people who do share your worldview). The sections below give general
recommendations. Please keep in mind that we should always be in 'learning mode' when it
comes to intercultural interactions. This way we develop strategies that result in meaningful
relationships and outcomes.

The recommendations were written for interacting with a person with one primary worldview.
When you discover that the person you interact with has more than one dominant worldview,
you use your understanding of both worldviews to adjust behavior.

4.1 Living out the strength of my Worldview

No worldview or mix of worldviews is better than the other. They are simply the lenses
through which we view the world. Each worldview has its strengths and its weaknesses.
Where most of us struggle when evaluating a different worldview is that we "see the speck
in the other's eye, but overlook the plank in our own eye".

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 10


Three Colors of Worldview

What this means is that we can clearly identify every instance where another group or
person overuses a driver that belongs to their worldview, but overlook all the instances
where we do the same. The charge to ourselves is to overcome our (deepest) fears and
insecurities, identify where we operate out of an abuse mechanism and move away from
that abuse mechanism. In intercultural interactions this is closely related to moving from
Cultural Critic behavior to Cultural Learner behavior.

4.2 Interacting with a person with a primary I/G worldview


People with a primary I/G worldview might align with the following:

Passionate about making the right choices in life.


Focus on establishing what is right and what is wrong.
Depend on laws, guidelines, policies, contracts, procedures
and codes.
Rely on written agreements and contracts to guide behavior.
Focus on establishing global consistency to ensure reliability
and structure.
Goal/issue centric negotiating.
Fairness, consistency and transparency are important words.

Some key behaviors that characterize people with a primary I/G worldview are:

Get frustrated when things don't happen as per the policy.


Tend to use direct communication.
Assumption can be made that compliance to the rules are, in the end, always good
for relationships.
Hold individuals accountable for their actions using "I", "You".
Often rewards an individual's performance based on ability and proven successes.
Will use the established law, policy, and procedures to fight for their right or establish
their innocence/value.

Usually, schools focus on developing deductive reasoning, critical thinking, cause and
effect, good questions and process as important skills and these are seen as important
values. These skills and values are indeed a strength of your worldview, as is the ability for
productive brainstorming. However, you might find that these skills are less valued and less
developed in other worldviews.

The way Innocence/Guilt plays out in the business world is that being right or wrong can be
very important in negotiations, in brainstorming sessions, and in collaborating as a team.
The worldview is continually there to help establish the correct answer to problems and to

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 11


Three Colors of Worldview

help people work together to find out what right or wrong actions would be.

4.3 Interacting with a person with a primary H/S worldview


People with a primary H/S worldview might align with the following:

Focus on establishing what will bring honor and what will


bring shame to the group.
Depend on key relationships within the group to leverage
from and influence others.
Rely strongly on verbal commitment to build relationships.
Relationship centric negotiating.
Loyalty and commitment are based on long-term nurtured
relationships.
Focus on enhancing or maintaining the honor of the group
as well as the individual relationships.

Some key behaviors that characterize people with a primary H/S worldview are:

Tend to use indirect communication to influence others.


Might make standards and policies subservient if they do not serve the relationship.
Place higher value on the pursuit of group goals.
Group is held accountable for growth & improving performance.
Link performance evaluation to the network of people and relationships.
Historical events are important to consider the development of today's relationships.

Strengths of the H/S worldview are its focus on relationships and the loyalty and
commitment that go with it. It tends to put the person first while contracts, rules and
regulations are to serve relationships, not the other way around.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 12


Three Colors of Worldview

4.4 Interacting with a person with a primary P/F worldview


People with a primary P/F worldview might align with the following:

Focus on establishing what will enhance or maintain power


base.
Depend on position in the hierarchy to influence others.
Rely on verbal commitment to build relationships.
Loyalty and commitment is linked to power position in the
relationship.
Relationship centric negotiating.
A position of power can be used to instill fear in people
around them to ensure compliance and loyalty.
A position of power can also be used to empower people
around them.

Some key behaviors that characterize people with a primary P/F worldview are:

Use of direct communication and strong language to ensure compliance, i.e. do as I say!
Communication:
Upward - Mostly indirect
Downward - Mostly direct
Get frustrated when pushed to follow procedures and policies.
Aggressive in ensuring compliance with direct reports.
Reward performance based on strong loyalty and compliance.
Invest energy to ensure they can work for or be seen by people with positions of power.

Strengths of the P/F worldview are its focus on relationships and the loyalty and commitment that
go with it. It tends to put the person first, while contracts, rules and regulations are there to serve
the people, not the other way around.

Strengths of the P/F worldview are that an appropriate amount of fear can keep you out of
trouble. Power/Fear mechanisms also shine when they are used to empower people in the
environment by giving boundaries or assistance in making sound decisions. A ruler, supervisor or
family leader who empowers and is seen as benevolent will be a great asset to his or her people.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 13


Three Colors of Worldview

5. My Insights and Actions


5.1 My Steps
Understanding the results:

Write down one or two ways in which the results represent you and your behavior. Write
down one or two ways in which your thinking or behavior was consistent with your
discovery tool results.

Recognizing your positive impact:

Write down 2 examples where your behavior resulted in a positive contribution to an


intercultural situation. Write down which worldview drivers were at play.

Recognizing your negative impact:

Write down examples where your behavior resulted in a negative contribution to an


intercultural situation. Write down which worldview drivers were at play.

Using the results for growth:

Based on the examples above, write down where personal growth would be helpful in
understanding and relating to each of the worldview drivers.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 14


Three Colors of Worldview

5.2 What's Next?

Congratulations, you took the Discovery Tool, and reviewed the report to get a better
understanding of your own worldview and what drives you. What are good next steps to take to
leverage the understanding of your cultural worldview?

Keep discovering more about yourself. The best way to improve your interactions with
others is to understand yourself better. Reread the pages that describe the drivers of your
worldview and take note which ones are applicable to you and how they unfold in your life.

Become a people observer. Observe how people are acting and interacting and think about
what drives them. Practicing this and making it a habit in your own environment will help
you tremendously when you step out of your (cultural) comfort zone.

Use the Pointers. When interacting with people who have a different worldview, use the
pointers given in chapter 4. Just remember, that they are not a blueprint that tell you
exactly (or roughly) how to interact with somebody, who has that worldview, but pointers
to help you get started on the journey of discovering how to interact.

Further Learning Options

MyKW web portal: The MyKW portal is your gateway to discovering ICI. You can log in with
the same user name and password you used for the Discovery Tool. In the portal pages,
you'll find the full version of this report, links to articles about ICI and The Three Colors of
Worldview© and links to e-learning options.
Workshops: If you want to develop further in ICI, attending a workshop is a good place to
start. They help to build ICI related competencies and introduce you to a network of fellow
practitioners. KnowledgeWorkx regularly organizes public workshops and also facilitates in-
house workshops when requested.
Coaching: Training improves potential, coaching improves performance. For many people,
coaching is a great way to help put whatever you learned into practice.
Certification: Several times a year KnowledgeWorkx organizes certification workshops for
those who want to become a champion for ICI. These are in-depth 4-day workshops with
added e-learning components and are the first step in becoming a certified ICI facilitator.
Get the ICI Book: This book is a product of our two decades experience, research and
application of the Inter-Cultural Intelligence (ICI) framework and methodology.

Copyright © 2016, KnowledgeWorkx FZE, All Rights Reserved page 15

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like