076 Turbidity Colombia
076 Turbidity Colombia
net/publication/378960520
CITATIONS READS
3 239
13 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Lisandra Rocha Meneses on 28 April 2024.
Received 10 October 2023; Revised 19 January 2024; Accepted 24 January 2024; Published 01 February 2024
       Abstract
       Despite the recognized efficiency of natural coagulants, their widespread adoption in the water treatment industry remains
       low. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of three natural coagulants—Moringa Oleifera, Yausa (Abutilon Insigne
       Planch), and Breadfruit (Artocarpus Altilis)—in reducing water turbidity levels of 40–50 NTU. Among these, two are
       native plant species potentially applicable in rural Colombian areas, where there are evident disparities in water
       infrastructure. This research contributes to the development of these coagulants, exploring their integration with existing
       water treatment methods, determining their optimal concentrations, and efficiencies in turbidity removal. Our findings
       reveal significant turbidity removal efficiencies: 88.9% for Moringa Oleifera, 83.3% for Yausa, and 67.2% for Breadfruit.
       These results indicate the feasibility of these agents as sustainable replacements for traditional chemical coagulants,
       exhibiting a level of effectiveness alike to that observed in Moringa Oleifera. However, challenges in practical
       implementation and sustainability, covering technical, environmental, economic, and social aspects, are notable obstacles.
       The aim of this study is to not only demonstrate the effectiveness of these natural coagulants but also to encourage their
       broader acceptance and integration into sustainable water treatment practices incorporating two unstudied plant species,
       such as Yausa and Breadfruit, furthering research to overcome existing challenges.
       Keywords: Water Treatment; Natural Coagulants; Moringa Oleifera; Yausa; Turbidity Removal; Color Removal; Sustainability.
1. Introduction
    Access to safe drinking water is a fundamental human right, essential for public health and sustainable development
[1]. A study conducted by Boretti and Rosa [2] on the United Nations World Report on Water Development (2019)
indicates that global water demand is steadily increasing, driven by growing industrial and domestic needs. Projections
suggest a 20–30% rise in water usage by 2050, exacerbating the challenges of ensuring adequate water availability and
quality. Currently, about 30% of the global population lacks access to safe drinking water, underscoring the urgency for
innovative water treatment solutions [3].
                  © 2024 by the authors. Licensee C.E.J, Tehran, Iran. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
                  conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
                                                                            655
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                         Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
    In developing countries, particularly in rural areas, where over 80% of small family farms reside, the absence of
proper water infrastructure significantly contributes to poverty and food insecurity [4]. These regions, vital for global
food production, are hindered by inadequate water and sanitation services, exacerbating socioeconomic disparities [5].
Improving water quality and availability in rural areas is critical for enhancing living conditions and economic
development [6]. Public water systems in these areas face challenges such as rising populations, operational
inefficiencies, and limited coverage, further intensifying the water crisis. Thus, there is a need for sustainable, cost-
effective water supply initiatives that are sensitive to the socio-economic realities of these populations [7].
    The Global Water Resources Report [2] highlights the socio-economic advantages of expanded utility coverage,
emphasizing the positive cost-benefit ratio of drinking water projects. This underscores the need for affordable water
supply solutions, especially in rural contexts, with pricing strategies that are sensitive to the varied socio-economic
groups within these communities. In alignment with these findings, nature-based solutions emerge as a promising avenue
[8]. They are actions that protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural and modified ecosystems to address societal
challenges effectively and adaptively, benefiting both people and nature. These solutions harness the resilience of
healthy ecosystems to safeguard human communities, optimize infrastructure, and ensure a stable and biodiverse future.
In this context, natural coagulants represent a viable, nature-based solution for water treatment. Derived from natural
sources like plants, they are readily accessible, cost-effective, simple to apply, biodegradable, non-toxic,
environmentally friendly, efficient, and result in lower sludge volumes [9]. This makes them particularly suitable for
rural areas, where economical and eco-sensitive water treatment methods are essential.
    In Latin America, the challenge of providing optimal water quality in rural areas is particularly acute [10]. For
instance, in Colombia, despite advancements in urban water supply, rural areas lag significantly behind [11]. The
National Institute of Health (2020) reports that only 42% of rural Colombians have access to safe drinking water [12].
This situation calls for effective, location-specific water treatment solutions. Conventionally, water purification relies
on chemical coagulation and flocculation. However, concerns about the health risks and environmental impact of
chemical coagulants like aluminum sulphate have prompted the search for sustainable alternatives [13]. Natural
coagulants, derived from plants and seeds, present a promising solution. Their cost-effectiveness, environmental
friendliness, and operational efficiency make them suitable for water treatment in resource-limited settings [14].
    This study evaluates the efficacy of three natural coagulants – Moringa oleifera (M. Oleifera), which is found in
various geographic locations worldwide, and Yausa (Abutilon insigne Planch) and Breadfruit (Artocarpus Altilis), both
native to Colombia – in the vital task of reducing water turbidity. This process is crucial for ensuring the provision of
clean, safe drinking water, a key factor in protecting public health and preserving ecological system integrity [14]. These
plants, while native to specific geographic areas and integral to local cultural and industrial practices, present a viable
and sustainable method for water treatment, particularly in rural communities [15, 16].
   This research includes a comparative evaluation of various coagulants to establish their respective efficacies. Special
emphasis is placed on Yausa (Abutilon insigne Planch) and Breadfruit (Artocarpus Altilis), as these native species are
expected to significantly enhance water quality in rural areas. The findings from this study are alleged to make a
substantial contribution towards the advancement of novel, economical, and eco-friendly water treatment technologies.
    The primary goal of this research is to pioneer a novel domain of inquiry by investigating the coagulation properties
of two Colombian native plant species, Yausa (Abutilon Insigne Planch) and Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis), alongside
the extensively studied Moringa Oleifera, for water treatment specifically for water turbidity reduction. Employing
natural coagulants in water treatment represents a pivotal shift towards sustainable and environmentally conscious
practices [14]. This strategy is especially relevant in rural areas of developing countries, where conventional treatment
methods may not be feasible [17]. Investigating and utilizing Yausa (Abutilon insigne Planch) and Breadfruit
(Artocarpus Altilis) of natural coagulants in these regions offers the potential to create water treatment solutions that are
both environmentally and economically sustainable. This approach not only ensures access to purified water but also
aids in conserving local ecosystems and fostering economic development, ultimately bolstering public health, and
strengthening the resilience of these communities [18].
                                                            656
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                                         Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
    Water treatment involves a combination of physical, chemical, and biological processes to remove impurities,
contaminants, and pathogens from water, making it safe for various applications. Coagulation, as one of the chemical
treatment methods, plays a crucial role in the overall water treatment process. It involves the addition of coagulants to
destabilize suspended particles and colloids, facilitating their aggregation into larger flocs for subsequent removal. Table
1 presents a summary of different methods for water treatment that utilize coagulants.
   Chemical coagulants are the most conventional products employed in water treatment processes to facilitate the
aggregation and precipitation of suspended particles, colloids, and other impurities. However, their environmental
drawbacks have led the utilization of natural coagulants into water treatment protocols.
    The consideration of natural coagulants as a replacement for conventional chemical coagulants embodies a paradigm
shift towards more sustainable and ecologically sound water treatment practices. The unique attributes of natural
coagulants align with the goals of existing water treatment, encompassing both operational efficiency and environmental
stewardship. The main attributes of natural coagulants are presented in Table 3.
                                                                       657
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                                         Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
  Natural coagulant
                                                                       Observations                                                    Reference
      attribute
                         Biodegradable and pose minimal risk to the environment. Unlike chemical coagulants, they do not introduce
   Eco-Friendliness                                                                                                                      [20]
                         synthetic compounds into water systems, reducing the potential for long-term ecological disruptions.
   Reduced Chemical      The chemical footprint is lower than chemical coagulants, ensuring water quality without compromising
                                                                                                                                        [14, 21]
       Residue           safety.
                         Their organic nature and reduced chemical content make them a safer choice, particularly in scenarios where
 Health Considerations                                                                                                                  [31, 32]
                         treated water is intended for consumption or direct human contact.
                         Their sustainable procurement and processing can result in lower economic outlays, aligning with budget
   Cost-Effectiveness                                                                                                                    [33]
                         considerations in water treatment projects.
Enhanced Environmental They minimize the introduction of extraneous substances into water systems, preserving water quality and
                                                                                                                                        [14-21]
    Compatibility      mitigating downstream environmental disturbances.
                                                                      658
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                           Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
                                                             659
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                                            Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
Table 4. Physicochemical characterization of test fresh water and synthetic effluent samples
4. Results
    Table 5 presents an analytical overview of experimental trials conducted to assess the turbidity removal efficiency
of three different natural coagulants. This table outlines how varying doses and concentrations of these coagulants
influence the turbidity reduction in water samples, in which it is correlated the specific coagulant quantities with the
corresponding decrease in turbidity levels, providing a quantitative understanding of the effectiveness of each coagulant.
This data is crucial for determining the optimal dosages required to achieve maximum turbidity removal, thereby
enabling a more precise and effective application of these natural coagulants in water treatment processes.
Table 5. Turbidity removal results from different concentration of selected natural coagulants
                                    Initial turbidity      Dose         Concentration    Final turbidity average   Turbidity removal average
            Coagulant
                                         (NTU)             (ml)            (mg/L)                (NTU)                        (%)
                                                            0.5             31.3                   13.2                         71.9
                                                             1              62.5                    5.2                         88.9
                                                            1.5             93.8                    5.3                         88.7
         Moringa Oleifera                  47
                                                             2              125                     5.3                         88.7
                                                            2.5             156.3                   6.4                         86.4
                                                             3              187.5                   6.9                         85.3
                                                             8               2                      7.9                         80.3
                                                            20               5                      7.0                         82.5
                                                                           660
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                                         Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
    The data clearly show evidence of the optimal doses and concentrations of coagulants for effectively reducing water
turbidity. The findings thus serve as a critical step towards the potential adoption and application of these coagulants in
water treatment processes, especially in contexts demanding environmentally friendly and cost-effective solutions. This
study considers water turbidity as a critical parameter in evaluating water quality, as it directly correlates with the
concentration of suspended particulates present. This measurement is essential in assessing water quality by indicating
potential health risks and ecological impacts associated with high particulate matter. Turbidity levels, therefore, serve
as a vital indicator for water treatment processes, environmental monitoring, and public health assessments, highlighting
the necessity of maintaining low turbidity for safe and clean water supply.
    In this research study, a series of trials were undertaken to assess the efficacy of three different natural coagulants in
turbidity mitigation. In the conducted trials, water samples treated with Moringa Oleifera had an initial turbidity of 47
NTU. In comparison, samples treated with Yausa and Breadfruit had lower initial turbidities of 40 NTU and 37 NTU,
respectively. Results from the trials show up the efficacy of Moringa Oleifera in turbidity reduction. When applied at a
concentration of 62.5 mg/L (1ml), Moringa Oleifera achieved an 88.9% decrease in turbidity illustrating its potential as
an agent for mitigating water turbidity (Figure 3). This level of efficiency is notable, especially in the context of treating
waters with high turbidity levels. Furthermore, these findings are in accordance with those reported by Peña-Guzmán &
Ortiz-Gutierrez [36], which reinforces the efficacy of Moringa Oleifera as a natural coagulant in water treatment
applications.
18
16
                                           14
                    Final Turbidity, NTU
12
10
                                            0
                                                0    0.5         1         1.5               2    2.5         3          3.5
                                                                                 Dose (ml)
    Results for Yausa (Abutilon Insigne Planch) demonstrated its considerable efficacy in turbidity reduction. As
illustrated in Figure 4, the optimal concentration for Yausa was determined to be 10 mg/L (40ml), reaching a turbidity
reduction efficiency of 83.3%. This level of effectiveness is significant, suggesting that Yausa could be a highly
competent natural coagulant. The ability of Yausa to effectively reduce turbidity at such a low concentration not only
underscores its potential as an efficient coagulant but also indicates its suitability for practical application in water
treatment processes, particularly in scenarios where minimal intervention is desired for maintaining ecological balance
and reducing treatment costs. Quezada-Moreno et al. [35] conducted similar experiments using Yausa (Abutilon Insigne
Planch) obtaining similar results on turbidity removal efficiency. Our results are in accordance with those of Garcés et
al. [37], in which it was investigated the turbidity removal capabilities of Yausa. Employing a comparable coagulant
solution preparation method, their study used a concentration of Yausa, specifically 250 mg/L. In their study, it was
found that the optimal dosage for achieving effective turbidity reduction was 70 mg/L, resulting in a turbidity removal
efficiency of 79.4%.
                                                                             661
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                                                          Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
7.8
                                               7.6
                   Final Turbidity, NTU
                                               7.4
7.2
6.8
                                               6.6
                                                      0            50         100        150           200     250         300           350
                                                                                           Dose (ml)
    Figure 5 presents the analysis of turbidity removal using various concentrations of the natural coagulant Breadfruit
(Artocarpus altilis). The data reveals that Breadfruit reaches its peak effectiveness at a concentration of 7000 mg/L
(140ml), where it accomplishes a turbidity removal efficiency of 67.2%. Although the required volume of the Breadfruit
coagulant solution for effective turbidity removal is higher compared to Yausa and Moringa Oleifera, its abundant
availability in the Nariño region still positions it as a promising coagulant option for water treatment. This local
abundance potentially offsets the need for higher volumes, making Breadfruit a viable and sustainable alternative in this
geographical context. Its use could contribute to regionally tailored water purification solutions, leveraging local
resources to address water quality challenges.
                                               14
                       Final Turbidity (NTU)
13
12
                                               11
                                                     90           100        110         120           130     140         150           160
                                                                                          Dose (ml)
    The capability of Breadfruit as a coagulant for turbidity removal in water has not been extensively studied, and to
our knowledge, this research is among the few documented studies available in the scientific literature. This gap
highlights the novelty and significance of our findings, contributing valuable new insights into the potential applications
of Breadfruit in water treatment processes.
   Figure 6 shows the comparative analysis of turbidity removal efficiencies across different concentrations of all
evaluated natural coagulants. The results demonstrate a distinct variation in effectiveness, with Moringa Oleifera (M.
Oleifera) achieving the highest turbidity reduction at 88.9%, followed by Yausa and Breadfruit with efficiencies of
83.3% and 67.2% respectively. This figure provides a representation of the coagulants' performance, offering a
comprehensive overview of their relative capabilities in reducing water turbidity.
                                                                                           662
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                                                Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
95
90
Turbidity Removal % 85
80 M. Oleifera
65
                                       60
                                            0     20      40      60      80         100   120      140        160       180       200
                                                                               Dose (ml)
Figure 6. Final turbidity removal percentage from M. Oleifera, Yausa and Breadfruit
   The abundance of Yausa and Breadfruit in the Nariño region offers a promising opportunity to attain water turbidity
reduction results like those achieved with Moringa Oleifera. Utilizing these naturally abundant coagulants in Nariño
could lead to effective and locally adapted water treatment solutions, potentially matching the efficiency of globally
recognized coagulants.
5. Discussion
    The results of the research study conducted into two unexplored native plant species, Yausa (Abutilon Insigne
Planch) and Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis), has yielded encouraging results. Extracts from these plants were utilized as
coagulants, and their efficacy in reducing water turbidity was assessed. The study found that Yausa achieved a turbidity
removal efficiency of 83.3% at a concentration of 10 mg/L, while Breadfruit showed an efficiency of 67.2% at a
significantly higher concentration of 7000 mg/L. In comparison, Moringa Oleifera demonstrated an 88.9% efficiency at
10 mg/L. These findings highlight Yausa's potential as an effective water treatment coagulant. However, it is notable
that while Breadfruit exhibited promising results, the required concentration of its active component for turbidity
removal is substantially greater than that of the other natural coagulants evaluated.
    According to the results of Peña-Guzman and Ortiz-Guiterrez [36], natural coagulant Moringa Oleifera, when
processed without its shell and using a standardized treatment procedure, achieves a 79.13% turbidity reduction at an
initial turbidity of 58 - 62 NTU with an optimal dose of 17.5 mg/L. This substantial decrease in turbidity highlights
Moringa's significant effectiveness as a natural coagulant. The high turbidity removal efficacy of Moringa Oleifera is
attributed to its cationic proteins, which possess a strong affinity for negatively charged particles and colloids prevalent
in turbid water [38]. Further studies, including those by Taiwo et al. [39], have demonstrated that these proteins
effectively bind with contaminants, facilitating their aggregation into larger flocs for easier sedimentation and removal.
Given its natural abundance and notable turbidity reduction capability, Moringa Oleifera presents itself as a viable option
for water purification.
    The experimental findings regarding Yausa's (Abutilon Insigne Planch) performance as a natural coagulant
demonstrate its notable efficiency, positioning it as a viable alternative to chemical coagulants. Achieving a turbidity
reduction rate of 83.3% at an optimal concentration of just 10 mg/L, Yausa proves to be not only effective but also
highly efficient, especially given the relatively low concentration required for such significant results. Comparable
results were reported by Garcés et al. [37], who used a concentration of 250 mg/L for Yausa in their experiments.
Adhering to a coagulant solution preparation method like ours, they determined that an optimal dosage of 70 mg/L was
effective, achieving a turbidity removal efficiency of 79.4%. The efficacy of Yausa as a coagulant is largely attributed
to its mucilaginous composition, which contributes to enhanced coagulation through increased solution viscosity,
effective charge interactions, bridge formation between particles, and facilitation of flocculation. These properties
underscore Yausa's potential as a sustainable and efficient option in water treatment applications.
   Breadfruit, despite achieving a turbidity reduction efficiency of 67.2%, lower compared to Moringa Oleifera and
Yausa, still demonstrates potential as an effective coagulant. The requirement of a higher optimal concentration,
specifically 7000 mg/L, indicates that Breadfruit's coagulation efficiency may be directly proportional to the
concentration used. This suggests that its application might be more appropriate in certain water treatment scenarios
where the use of higher coagulant concentrations is both feasible and practical. Based on current literature, there appears
                                                                               663
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                         Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
to be limited research specifically focusing on the efficacy of Breadfruit in the removal of turbidity from freshwater
sources. The coagulation properties of Breadfruit may be linked to the presence of latex in its chemical composition.
This latex is rich in proteolytic enzymes, or proteases, known for their pronounced ability to coagulate suspended
particles and contaminants in water. Such biochemical attributes suggest Breadfruit's potential utility in water
purification, warranting further exploration into its specific mechanisms of action and optimal application conditions
[40]. Research conducted by Mótyán et al. [41] provides insights into the functional mechanisms of proteolytic enzymes
found in coagulants like Breadfruit. These enzymes interact with proteins in the water, disrupting their stability and
thereby reducing the steric and electrostatic barriers that typically inhibit the agglomeration of colloidal particles. Such
destabilization promotes the aggregation of these particles. A significant characteristic of these enzymes is their
operational adaptability across various pH levels, which makes them suitable for a range of water conditions and obviates
the need for pH adjustments during the treatment process [42].
    Although all three studied natural coagulants, Moringa Oleifera, Yausa, and Breadfruit, have demonstrated
effectiveness in turbidity removal, the variations in their optimal concentrations and efficiency rates indicate potential
for diverse applications in water treatment. Yausa, requiring a lower concentration, suggests a reduced need for raw
materials, while Moringa Oleifera stands out for its ease of preparation. These distinctions provide a foundation for
further research aimed at optimizing the application of these natural coagulants, fitted to the specific requirements of
different water treatment scenarios.
7. Declarations
7.1. Author Contributions
   Conceptualization: L.S., E.N., R.S., D.P., E.S., J.C., L.C., G.E., M.B., S.D., and M.L.R.; data curation, L.S., E.N.,
and M.L.; formal analysis, L.S., E.N., and M.L.; supervision, L.S., E.N., and M.L.; methodology, L.S., E.N., and M.L.;
validation, L.S., E.N., and M.L.; writing original draft: L.S., E.N., and M.L.; project administration, L.S., R.S., and E.N.;
resources, L.S., R.S., and E.N.; writing—review and editing D.R. and D.A. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
                                                            664
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                             Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
7.3. Funding
   This work was supported by the Mariana University, grant Number IC1-10.
7.4. Acknowledgements
   This study received support from both the Mariana University and University of Medellin, generously granting access
to their laboratories for conducting these analyses. Our gratitude extends to Hugo Espinoza chemistry laboratory
coordinator at the Mariana University, whose contributions were integral to this endeavour.
8. References
[1] Salem, H. S., Pudza, M. Y., & Yihdego, Y. (2022). Water strategies and water–food Nexus: challenges and opportunities towards
    sustainable development in various regions of the World. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 8(4), 114.
    doi:10.1007/s40899-022-00676-3.
[2] Boretti, A., & Rosa, L. (2019). Reassessing the projections of the World Water Development Report. NPJ Clean Water, 2(1), 15.
    doi:10.1038/s41545-019-0039-9.
[3] Mishra, R. K. (2023). Fresh Water availability and Its Global challenge. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced
    Studies, 4(3), 1–78. doi:10.37745/bjmas.2022.0208.
[4] Durán-Sandoval, D., Durán-Romero, G., & Uleri, F. (2023). How Much Food Loss and Waste Do Countries with Problems with
    Food Security Generate? Agriculture, 13(5), 966. doi:10.3390/agriculture13050966.
[5] Mac Mahon, J. (2022). Water purity and sustainable water treatment systems for developing countries. Water and Climate Change,
    115–144, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99875-8.00021-5.
[6] Salehi, M. (2022). Global water shortage and potable water safety; Today’s concern and tomorrow’s crisis. Environment
    International, 158, 106936. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106936.
[7] Dadebo, D., Obura, D., & Kimera, D. (2023). Hydraulic modeling and prediction of performance for a drinking water supply
    system towards the achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs): A system case study from Uganda. Groundwater for
    Sustainable Development, 22, 100951. doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100951.
[8] Koul, B., Bhat, N., Abubakar, M., Mishra, M., Arukha, A. P., & Yadav, D. (2022). Application of Natural Coagulants in Water
    Treatment: A Sustainable Alternative to Chemicals. Water, 14(22), 3751. doi:10.3390/w14223751.
[9] Karnena, M. K., Konni, M., Dwarapureddi, B. K., & Saritha, V. (2022). Blend of natural coagulants as a sustainable solution for
    challenges of pollution from aquaculture wastewater. Applied Water Science, 12(3), 47. doi:10.1007/s13201-021-01501-6.
[10] Rodríguez, C., García, B., Pinto, C., Sánchez, R., Serrano, J., & Leiva, E. (2022). Water Context in Latin America and the
     Caribbean: Distribution, Regulations and Prospects for Water Reuse and Reclamation. Water, 14(21), 3589.
     doi:10.3390/w14213589.
[11] Duque, J. C., García, G. A., Lozano‐ Gracia, N., Quiñones, M., & Montoya, K. Y. (2023). Inequality and space in a highly
     unequal country: What does the literature tell us in the context of Colombia? Regional Science Policy & Practice, 15(9), 2065–
     2086. doi:10.1111/rsp3.12681.
[12] Irannezhad, M., Ahmadi, B., Liu, J., Chen, D., & Matthews, J. H. (2022). Global water security: A shining star in the dark sky
     of achieving the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Horizons, 1, 100005. doi:10.1016/j.horiz.2021.100005.
[13] Krupińska, I. (2020). Aluminium Drinking Water Treatment Residuals and Their Toxic Impact on Human Health. Molecules,
     25(3), 641. doi:10.3390/molecules25030641.
[14] Ang, W. L., & Mohammad, A. W. (2020). State of the art and sustainability of natural coagulants in water and wastewater
     treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121267. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121267.
[15] Quezada-Moreno, W. F., Quezada-Torres, W. D., Gallardo-Aguilar, I., Proaño-Molina, M., Cevallos-Carvajal, E., Bravo-
     Zambonino, J., ... & Trávez-Castellano, A. (2020). Natural clarification of cane juice: Technology and quality of hydrolyzed
     honey. Afinidad, 77(590).
[16] Quijano, J., & Arango, G. J. (1979). The breadfruit from colombia-a detailed chemical analysis. Economic Botany, 33(2), 199–
     202. doi:10.1007/bf02858288.
[17] Villabona-Ortíz, Á., Tejada-Tovar, C., Ortega-Toro, R., Dager, N. L., & Anibal, M. M. (2022). Natural coagulation as an
     alternative to raw water treatment. Journal of Water and Land Development, 21–26. doi:10.24425/jwld.2023.143740.
                                                               665
Civil Engineering Journal                                                                                Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
[18] Vargas, M. A., Armas, A. S., Valencia, Z. L., & Benites-Alfaro, E. (2022). Safety in Wastewater Treatment Plants and the use
     of Natural Coagulants as an Alternative for Turbidity. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 91, 301-306.
[19] Bahrodin, M. B., Zaidi, N. S., Hussein, N., Sillanpää, M., Prasetyo, D. D., & Syafiuddin, A. (2021). Recent Advances on
     Coagulation-Based Treatment of Wastewater: Transition from Chemical to Natural Coagulant. Current Pollution Reports, 7(3),
     379–391. doi:10.1007/s40726-021-00191-7.
[20] Jagaba, A. H., Kutty, S. R. M., Hayder, G., Latiff, A. A. A., Aziz, N. A. A., Umaru, I., Ghaleb, A. A. S., Abubakar, S., Lawal,
     I. M., & Nasara, M. A. (2020). Sustainable use of natural and chemical coagulants for contaminants removal from palm oil mill
     effluent: A comparative analysis. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(4), 951–960. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.01.018.
[21] Nath, A., Mishra, A., & Pande, P. P. (2021). A review natural polymeric coagulants in wastewater treatment. Materials Today:
     Proceedings, 46, 6113–6117. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.551.
[22] Sun, Y., Zhou, S., Chiang, P.-C., & Shah, K. J. (2019). Evaluation and optimization of enhanced coagulation process: Water and
     energy nexus. Water-Energy Nexus, 2(1), 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.wen.2020.01.001.
[23] Cui, H., Huang, X., Yu, Z., Chen, P., & Cao, X. (2020). Application progress of enhanced coagulation in water treatment. RSC
     Advances, 10(34), 20231–20244. doi:10.1039/d0ra02979c.
[24] Liu, Z., Wei, H., Li, A., & Yang, H. (2019). Enhanced coagulation of low-turbidity micro-polluted surface water: Properties and
     optimization. Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 739–747. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.101.
[25] Li, Z.-H., Yuan, L., Gao, S.-X., Wang, L., & Sheng, G.-P. (2019). Mitigated membrane fouling and enhanced removal of
     extracellular antibiotic resistance genes from wastewater effluent via an integrated pre-coagulation and microfiltration process.
     Water Research, 159, 145–152. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.005.
[26] Aly, S. A., Anderson, W. B., & Huck, P. M. (2020). In-line coagulation assessment for ultrafiltration fouling reduction to treat
     secondary effluent for water reuse. Water Science and Technology, 83(2), 284–296. doi:10.2166/wst.2020.571.
[27] Zafisah, N. S., Ang, W. L., Mohammad, A. W., Hilal, N., & Johnson, D. J. (2020). Interaction between ballasting agent and
     flocs in ballasted flocculation for the removal of suspended solids in water. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 33, 101028.
     doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101028.
[28] Bouchareb, R., Derbal, K., Özay, Y., Bilici, Z., & Dizge, N. (2020). Combined natural / chemical coagulation and membrane
     filtration for wood processing wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 37, 101521.
     doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101521.
[29] Malkoske, T. A., Bérubé, P. R., & Andrews, R. C. (2020). Coagulation/flocculation prior to low pressure membranes in drinking
     water treatment: a review. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 6(11), 2993–3023. doi:10.1039/d0ew00461h.
[30] Ahmed, S. F., Mehejabin, F., Momtahin, A., Tasannum, N., Faria, N. T., Mofijur, M., Hoang, A. T., Vo, D.-V. N., & Mahlia, T.
     M. I. (2022). Strategies to improve membrane performance in wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 306, 135527.
     doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135527.
[31] Alenazi, M., Hashim, K. S., Hassan, A. A., Muradov, M., Kot, P., & Abdulhadi, B. (2020). Turbidity removal using natural
     coagulants derived from the seeds of strychnos potatorum: statistical and experimental approach. IOP Conference Series:
     Materials Science and Engineering, 888(1), 12064. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/888/1/012064.
[32] Ang, W. L., & Mohammad, A. W. (2020). State of the art and sustainability of natural coagulants in water and wastewater
     treatment. Journal of Cleaner production, 262, 121267. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121267.
[33] Hadadi, A., Imessaoudene, A., Bollinger, J.-C., Assadi, A. A., Amrane, A., & Mouni, L. (2022). Comparison of Four Plant-
     Based Bio-Coagulants Performances against Alum and Ferric Chloride in the Turbidity Improvement of Bentonite Synthetic
     Water. Water, 14(20), 3324. doi:10.3390/w14203324.
[34] Al-Jadabi, N., Laaouan, M., El Hajjaji, S., Mabrouki, J., Benbouzid, M., & Dhiba, D. (2023). The Dual Performance of Moringa
     Oleifera Seeds as Eco-Friendly Natural Coagulant and as an Antimicrobial for Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Sustainability,
     15(5), 4280. doi:10.3390/su15054280.
[35] Quezada Moreno, W., Cevallos Carvajal, E., Yomara Proaño, M., Medina Litardo, R., Mariela Proaño, P., Quezada Torres, W.,
     Caicedo Álvarez, M., & Muñoz López, C. (2023). Thickening capacity of Cordia lutea Lam mucilage gum in a liquid soap
     formulation. Afinidad. Journal of Chemical Engineering Theoretical and Applied Chemistry, 80(599), 133–141.
     doi:10.55815/418005.
[36] Peña-Guzmán, C., & Ortiz-Gutierrez, B. E. (2022). Evaluation of Three Natural Coagulant from Moringa Oleifera Seed for the
     Treatment of Synthetic Greywater. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(12), 3842–3853. doi:10.28991/cej-2022-08-12-013.
[37] Garcés, S. D., Revelo, M. C. B., & Plata, L. G. (2019). Evaluation of Yausa as a Natural Coagulant in the treatment of waters
     for human consumption. Boletin Informativo CEI, 6(2), 104-109.
                                                                666
     Civil Engineering Journal                                                                               Vol. 10, No. 02, February, 2024
     [38] Rompegading, A. B., Hamza, Arafah, M., Akbar, H., Tolinggi, S., Yani, A., Nur, M., Rijal, S., Fudholi, A., & Irfandi, R. (2023).
          The Use of Moringa Seed (Moringa oleifera) Extract as a Natural Coagulant to Reduce the Turbidity Level of Worongnge
          Village River Water. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 18(1), 169–174.
          doi:10.18280/ijdne.180120.
     [39] Taiwo, A. S., Adenike, K., & Aderonke, O. (2020). Efficacy of a natural coagulant protein from Moringa oleifera (Lam) seeds
          in treatment of Opa reservoir water, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Heliyon, 6(1), e03335. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03335.
     [40] Zhao, Q., Huang, A., Wu, G., Guo, Q., Li, M., & Wang, X. (2022). Identification, structure, and caseinolytic properties of milk-
          clotting proteases from Moringa oleifera flowers. Food Research International, 159, 111598. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111598.
     [41] Mótyán, J., Tóth, F., & Tőzsér, J. (2013). Research Applications of Proteolytic Enzymes in Molecular Biology. Biomolecules,
          3(4), 923–942. doi:10.3390/biom3040923.
     [42] Parmar, N., Singh, A., & Ward, O. P. (2001). Enzyme treatment to reduce solids and improve settling of sewage sludge. Journal
          of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 26(6), 383–386. doi:10.1038/sj.jim.7000150.
                                                                     667
View publication stats