Wave Particle Duality5
Wave Particle Duality5
1.0 Relativity
1.1 Introduction to relativity*
1.2 Galilean relativity*
1.3 Time dilation*
1.4 Length contraction*
1.5 Relativistic mechanics*
1.6 Einstein’s mass energy relation*
2.0 Wave particle duality
2.1 Black body radiation
2.2 Photoelectric effect *
2.3 Gravitational red shift
2.4 Spectral lines
2.5 de Broglie waves
2.6 Uncertainty principle
4.3 Radioactivity
Mirror M, inclined at 45 ℃ to the incident light beam splits the beam into two. One beam is
transmitted to mirror M 2 and the other is reflected towards mirror M 1. After reflection from
M 1 and M 2 the two rays eventually recombine at M to produce interference pattern which can
be viewed through the telescope. The glass plate P, equal in thickness to mirror m, ensures
that the two returning rays travel the same thickness of glass. Mirror M 1 if adjusted, causes
series of bright and dark fringes due to interference.
[ ]
2 −1 2 −1
2L v v
∆ t=t 1−t 2= (1− 2 ) −( 1− 2 ) 2
c c c
2
v
Because 2
≪¿ 1 we can simplify using binomial expansion after dropping all
c
terms higher than second order
(1−x ) ≈ 1−nx for x << 1
n
2
v
In our case, x= 2 , and we find that
c
2
Lv
∆ t=t 1−t 2 ≈ 3
c
Question 3
a) Calculate the relativistic momentum of a proton moving at a speed of v
=0.86c in both
i. kg .m/ s
ii. eV
Relativistic Mechanics
1. Relativistic Momentum
Where m is rest mass or proper mass of an object, its mass when measured at
rest.
Question 3
i. kg .m/ s(joules)
ii. eV
dv dp d
Relativistic second law becomes F=γma=γm =γ = (γmv) 4
dt dt dt
Example
Find acceleration of a particle of mass m and velocity v when it is acted upon by a constant
force F, where F is parallel to v
dv
Since a=
dt
(√ )
d v
d m
F= (γmv) = dt v2 5
dt 1−
c2
dy/du =dy/du*du/dv
2
v −3
Let u=1− 2 du/d=-1/2U 2
c
−3
dy/dv= -1/2U
2
( −2c v )( dvdt )
2
[ ( ) ( ) dt )]+ γma
2 −3
F=mv
−1
2
v
1− 2
c
2
( −2 v
dv
c
2 8
( ) ( ) ( )
2 −3 2 −1 2 −1
v 2 v 2 v
Note sidework 1− 2 = 1− 2 . 1− 2
c c c
[ ]
v2 v2
2
+1− 2
c c
F=γma 10
v2
1− 2
c
( ) ( )( ) ( )
2 3 2 1 2 1 2 3
v v v 3 v
Note 1− 2 2 = 1− 2 2 . 1− 2 hence γ = 1− 2 2
c c c c
Equation 10 becomes
[ ]
1
F=γma
v2
1−
c2
3
F=γ ma
F
a= 3
mγ
( )
2 3/ 2
F v
a= 1− 2 acceleration of the particle
m c
The work done W on an object by a constant force F through a distance s moving with a
velocity v is W = Fs. If no other force work and the particle starts from rest, all the work
done on it become kinetic energy
s
K.E = ∫ Fds 1
0
In non relativistic physics the formula for kinetic energy is
1 2
K . E= m v 2
2
To the correct relativistic formula for kinetic energy, we start from relativistic form of
Newton second law
s mv v
dγmv
K . E=∫ ds=∫ vdγmv=∫ vd ¿ ¿ 3
0 dt 0 0
v
K . E=∫ vd ¿ ¿ 4
0
v
Let y be and x be v hence dx is dv
√¿ ¿ ¿
v
mvv v dv
K . E= −m∫
√ 1−v 2
/c
2
0 √ 1−v 2 /c2
Research on steps missed here
v
v dv
Side work m∫
0 √ 1−v 2 /c 2
v
2
du −2 v −2 vdv 2 du
Let u=1− 2 therefore = 2 or du= or vdv=−c
c dx c c
2
2
2 1
−c du
√
v 2 −1 2 2
v
−c du mc u v2
m∫
v v
v dv 2 2
−c u du =-
m∫ =m ∫ 1 2 = 1 =
m ∫ 2 2∗1 =−mc 2
1−
0 √ 1−v /c
2 2 2
o
0
2 u2 0
c
u 2
2
2
K . E=
mv
√ 1−v /c
2 2
+ [ mc √ 1−v /c ] v
2 2 2
0 () 5
2
mv
+ mc √ 1−v /c −m c
2 2 2 2
K . E= 6
√ 1−v /c
2 2
( )
2
2 v
2
m c 1− 2
mv c 2
K . E= + −m c 7
√ 1−v
( )
2 2 2 1 /2
/c v
1− 2
c
( )
2
v
1− 2
c
Note 7 above √ 1−v 2 2
/c =¿
( )
1/ 2
v2
1− 2
c
m v2 m c 2−m v 2
K . E= + −m c2
√ 1−v /c 1− v
( )
2 1 /2
2 2
8
c2
2 2 2
m v + mc −mv
K . E= -m c 2 9
√ 1−v 2 2
/c
2
mc 2
K . E= −m c 10
√ 1−v /c
2 2
2
K . E=γm c −mc =(γ −1)m c
2 2
11
Equation 11 says that, the kinetic energy of a particle is equal to the difference
between γm c 2∧¿ m c 2
Hence
Total Energy 2
E=γm c =m c + K . E
2
13
Rest energy EO =m c2
If the object is moving, its total energy is
2
mc
2
E=γm c =¿
√1−v 2 /c 2
Example 1.6
A stationary body explodes into two fragments each of mass 2.5 kg that move apart at speeds
of 0.6c relative to the original body. Find the mass of the original body.
Solution
The rest energy of the original body must equal the sum of the total
energies of the fragments. Hence EO =m c2 rest energy
Subtract p c
2 2
from E2
2 2 2
m v c
2 4
m c
E −p c =
2
2 2 2
2 2
−¿ v
1− 2
= m2 c 4 ¿¿
1−v / c
c
2 2
E − p c =( mc )
2 2 2
2 2
E = (m c ) + p c
2 2 2
Energy and momentum
The relationship between E and p for a particle with m=0
E=pc massless particle
Electronvolts
In atomic physics the usual unit of energy is the electronvolt (eV), where 1 eV is the energy
gained by an electron accelerated through a potential difference of 1 volt.
1eV = 1.602 x 10−19 joules
Example 1.8
An electron (m = 0.511 MeV/c 2) and a photon (m = 0) both have momenta of 2.000 MeV/c.
Find the total energy of each.
2 2
E = (m c ) + p c
2 2 2
√ 2 2
E= ( mc ) + p c =
2 2
√ ((0.511 MeV /c )c ) +(2.0 MeV /c ) c
2 2 2 2 2
= 2.064 MeV
We regard electrons as particles because they possess charge and mass and behave according
to the laws of particle mechanics in such familiar devices as television picture tubes. We shall
see, however, that it is just as correct to interpret a moving electron as a wave manifestation
as it is to interpret it as a particle manifestation. We regard electromagnetic waves as waves
because under suitable circumstances they exhibit diffraction, interference, and polarization.
Similarly, we shall see that under other circumstances electromagnetic waves behave as
though they consist of streams of particles.
ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES
In 1864 the British physicist James Clerk Maxwell made the remarkable suggestion that
accelerated electric charges generate linked electric and magnetic disturbances that can travel
indefinitely through space. If the charges oscillate periodically, the disturbances are waves
whose electric and magnetic components are perpendicular to each other and to the direction
of propagation, as in Fig. 2.1.
Maxwell was able to show that the speed c of electromagnetic waves in free space is given by
During Maxwell’s lifetime the notion of em waves remained without direct experimental
support. Finally, in 1888, the German physicist Heinrich Hertz showed that em waves indeed
exist and behave exactly as Maxwell had predicted.
Hertz determined the wavelength and speed of the waves he generated, showed that they have
both electric and magnetic components, and found that they could be reflected, refracted, and
diffracted. Light is not the only example of an em wave. Although all such waves have the
same fundamental nature, many features of their interaction with matter depend upon their
frequencies. Light waves, which are em waves the eye responds to, span only a brief
frequency interval, from about 4.3 x 1014 Hz for red light to about 7.5 x 1014 Hz for violet
light. Figure 2.2 shows the em wave spectrum from the low frequencies used in radio
communication to the high frequencies found in x-rays and gamma rays.
BLACKBODY RADIATION
Following Hertz’s experiments, the question of the fundamental nature of light seemed clear:
light consisted of em waves that obeyed Maxwell’s theory. This certainty lasted only a dozen
years. The first sign that something was seriously amiss came from attempts to understand
the origin of the radiation emitted by bodies of matter.
We are all familiar with the glow of a hot piece of metal, which gives off visible light whose
color varies with the temperature of the metal, going from red to yellow to white as it
becomes hotter and hotter. In fact, other frequencies to which our eyes do not respond are
present as well. An object need not be so hot that it is luminous for it to be radiating em
energy; all objects radiate such energy continuously whatever their temperatures, though
which frequencies predominate depends on the temperature. At room temperature most of the
radiation is in the infrared part of the spectrum and hence is invisible.
It is convenient to consider as an ideal body one that absorbs all radiation incident upon it,
regardless of frequency. Such a body is called a blackbody.
One of the problems faced by scientists in 19th century was how to explain the spectra of
electromagnetic radiation emitted by hot objects. At everyday temperatures this radiation is
almost all in the infra region (IR) and thus not visible to our eyes. At a temperature of 1000 K
an object begins to emit an appreciable amount of radiation in the long wavelength end of the
visible spectrum, observed as reddish glow.
Still higher temperatures cause radiation to shift to even shorter wavelengths and the color to
change to yellow orange. Above 2000 k an object glows yellowish white like the filament of
a light bulb and gives off appreciable amounts of all the visible colors (wavelengths) but with
different percentages, Figure 3.3 shows intensity versus wavelength curves for the thermal
radiation from a blackbody at different temperatures. Why does the blackbody spectrum
have the shape shown?
A blackbody radiates more when it is hot than when it is cold, and the spectrum of a hot
blackbody has its peak at a higher frequency than the peak in the spectrum of a cooler one.
We recall the behavior of an iron bar as it is heated to progressively higher temperatures: at
first it glows dull red, then bright orange-red, and eventually it becomes “white hot.” The
spectrum of blackbody radiation is shown in Fig. 2.6 for two temperatures.
The Ultraviolet Catastrophe
Why does the blackbody spectrum have the shape shown in Fig. 2.6? This problem was
examined at the end of the nineteenth century by Lord Rayleigh and James Jeans. Lord
Rayleigh and James Jeans developed the following formula in a quest to explain the spectrum
emitted by a black body.
o
The failure of classical physics led Max Plank to the discovery that radiation is emitted in
quanta whose energy is hv where v- frequency. But where does this radiation originate?
Planks formula fits the observed data very well as shown in figure 3.16
Explanation of black body radiation
Can only be explained by Plank theory of quantization. Which states that energy is
absorbed or emitted as discrete packets.
Atoms at low energies exist at ground state, when heated they jump to a higher energy
level absorbing a photon of energy of a given colour, on increased heating the
electron will jump to even higher energy level and emit a photon of light of different
colour
1. Different atoms and molecules can emit or absorb energy in discrete quantities only.
The smallest amount of energy that can be emitted or absorbed in the form of
electromagnetic radiation is known as quantum.
2. The energy of the radiation absorbed or emitted is directly proportional to the
frequency of the radiation.
E=hν
Where,
ν= Frequency of radiation
Interestingly, Planck has also concluded that these were only an aspect of the processes of
absorption and emission of radiation. They had nothing to do with the physical reality of the
radiation itself. Later in the year 1905, famous German physicist, Albert Einstein also
reinterpreted Planck’s theory to further explain the photoelectric effect. He was of the opinion
that if some source of light was focused on certain materials, they can eject electrons from the
material. Basically, Planck’s work led Einstein in determining that light exists in discrete
quanta of energy, or photons
In 1905, Einstein realized that energy in light is not spread out but exists as discrete packets
called qunta or photons. Each photon of light of frequency v have energy
E=v h 1
Since v=c / λ 2
We get
ch
E= 3
λ
We often speak of photons as if they were particles and as concentrated bundles of energy
they have particle like properties. Photons travel with speed of light and so they must obey
the relativistic relationship p=E /c (since E = m c 2 = (mc)c = pc )
Suppose v o is the minimum frequency of light below which no photoelectrons are emitted.
The energy represented by equation 1 becomes
is called the work function of the metal. The greater the work function of a material the
greater the energy required for an electron to leave its surface. Some examples of
workfunctions for different metals are illustrated on the table below
To pull an electron from a metal surface generally takes about half as much energy as that
needed to pull an electron from a free atom of that metal
Example
Ultraviolet light of wavelength 350 nm is directed at a potassium surface. Find the maximum
KE of the photoelectrons.
Assignment
Explain what is meant by gravitational red shift of spectral lines
DE BROGLIE WAVES
A moving body behaves in certain ways as though it has a wave nature
Louis de Broglie (1892–1987), His doctoral thesis in 1924 contained the proposal that
moving bodies have wave like properties that complement their particle properties: