0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views41 pages

Lecture 35

The document discusses transmission pricing methods in restructured power systems, focusing on power flow tracing and its applications. It outlines various techniques for analyzing power flows, including DC power flow and marginal participation methods, and emphasizes the importance of understanding generator-load interactions. Additionally, it describes the prerequisites and algorithms for effective power tracing, highlighting its role in loss allocation and cost distribution among generators and loads.

Uploaded by

hsahni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views41 pages

Lecture 35

The document discusses transmission pricing methods in restructured power systems, focusing on power flow tracing and its applications. It outlines various techniques for analyzing power flows, including DC power flow and marginal participation methods, and emphasizes the importance of understanding generator-load interactions. Additionally, it describes the prerequisites and algorithms for effective power tracing, highlighting its role in loss allocation and cost distribution among generators and loads.

Uploaded by

hsahni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 41

17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 1

EEN/L-671:
RESTRUCTURED POWER
SYSTEMS
LECTURE 35: Transmission Pricing
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 2

Methods Considering Power Flows


• Use of DC power flow
• Usage based on tracing results (Tracing)
• Marginal Participation Method (MP)
• Equivalent bilateral exchange (EBE)
• Other line usage factors based on sensitivities

• Salient Features:
• Simulate a transaction or obtain a snap shot for pool
• Find out contribution of each transaction or individual entity into line
flows
• Attribute cost of line in proportion to participation of each
transaction or entity
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 3

DC Power Flow Based MW-Mile Method

S. Reactance Ll Pmax
Element Wl
No. (pu) (km) (MW)
1 1-3 0.2 200 0.25 100

T1=65 MW T2=35 MW 2 2-3 0.25 100 0.5 50


3 1-2 0.4 100 0.5 50
G2
G1 𝑀𝑊𝑀𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑡 = ෍ 𝑊𝑙 𝑀𝑊𝑡,𝑙 𝐿𝑙
𝑙

𝑇𝐶 = 10000

Line Line Line


MWMilet TCt
1-3 2-3 1-2
T1= Flow (MW) 50 15 15
65 4000 6400
MW MWMilet,l 2500 750 750
T1=65 MW
T2= Flow (MW) 10 25 10
T2=35 MW 35 2250 3600
MW MWMilet,l 500 1250 500
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 4

Power flow tracing


L4
100 MW
50 MW
A 71
1 5

29
1
22

2 4
64 18
3
B L1
15 MW L2 L3
45 MW 40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 5

Power flow tracing


Line flow decomposition into generator components
Line usage by generators
Gen 1 Gen 2 … Gen m
Line 1 A11 A12 … A1m
Line 2 A21 A22 … A2m
… … … … …
Line i Ai1 Ai2 … Aim
Aij is power flow component of jth generator on ith line
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 6

Power flow tracing


Load-generation interaction
Gen 1 Gen 2 … Gen n
Load 1 B11 B12 … B1n
Load 2 B21 B22 … B2n
… … … … …
Load m Bm1 Bm2 … Bmn
Bij is power provided by jth generator to ith load
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 7

Power flow tracing


L4
100 MW
50 MW
A 71

1 5

29
1
22

2 64 18 4
3
B L1
15 MW L2 L3
45 MW 40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 8

Power flow tracing


Line flow decomposition into load components
Line usage by loads
Load 1 Load 2 … Load n
Line 1 C11 C12 … C1n
Line 2 C21 C22 … C2n
… … … … …
Line i Ci1 Ci2 … Cin
Cij is power flow component of jth load on ith line
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 9

Power flow tracing


Generator-load interaction
Load 1 Load 2 … Load m
Gen 1 D11 D12 … D1m
Gen 2 D21 D22 … D2m
… … … … …
Gen n Dn1 Dn2 … Dnm
Dij is power received by jth load from ith generator including losses
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 10

Power flow tracing


Line loss allocation to loads and generators
Loss sharing by loads and generators
Load Load Load
… Gen 1 Gen 2 … Gen m
1 2 n
Line 1 L11 L12 … L1n G11 G12 … G1m
Line 2 L21 L22 … L2n G21 G22 … G2m
… … … … … … … … …
Line i Li1 Li2 … Lin Gi1 Gi2 … Gim
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 11

What is Power Tracing?: Definition


• Power Tracing is a tool, applied Post-facto on power flow
snap-shot that provides complete power audit information
like:
• Share of loads in Generation
• Generators’ contribution in Loads
• Decomposition of Transmission line flows into Generator and Load
Components
• Loss allocation to generators and Loads
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 12

Power tracing

State estimation
Data solution or
metered data

Algorithm Power tracing

Transmission line
Results Loss allocation flow
decomposition
Load-generator
interaction

Point-of-
Ex-post Tractability of
Applications Loss pricing
connection ex-
ante transmission
pricing
transmission cost
allocation
bilateral
transactions
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 13

Fundamentals of power tracing


17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 14

What are pre-requisites of Power Tracing?


• State Estimation Solution

• Or

• Power flows over lines and,


• Injections at generator and load buses and,
• Network topology (single line diagram)
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 15

Power Tracing: Two Versions


• Downstream Algorithm
• Generator Side Statements
• Each Generator’s contribution in Transmission Line flows
• Each Generator’s contribution in Transmission Line losses
• Net power sent to a particular load

• Upstream Algorithm
• Load Side Statements
• Each Load’s contribution in Transmission Line flows
• Each Load’s contribution in Transmission Line losses
• Power received from a particular generator including losses
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 17

Proportionate Sharing Principle


j k
40 60

70 30
m l

Line Share of line j-i Share of line k-i


40 60
i-m 70 × = 28 70 × = 42
100 100
40 60
i-l 30 × = 12 30 × = 18
100 100
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 18

Graph Theoretic Approach


17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 19

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing Concept
• Proved Lemma:
• A finite nodes power system without circular flows has at least one
pure source

• Symbolic node elimination


• Tops Down Approach
• Starts at ‘Pure Source’
• Ends at ‘Pure Sink’
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 20

Downstream Algorithm: Various


Decompositions

j 40 60 k
i

30 30 40
m l n

Decomposition Formula

𝐺 𝑃𝐺𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡
Line flow decomposition 𝑃𝑙𝑚 = 𝑁𝑔 𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡 𝑃𝑙𝑚
σ𝑖=1 𝑃𝐺

𝑠 𝑟
𝑃𝐺𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡
Loss decomposition 𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑃𝑙𝑚 = (𝑃𝑙𝑚 − 𝑃𝑙𝑚 )
𝐺𝑖
σ𝑁𝑔 𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡
𝑖=1 𝑃𝐺
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 21

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing
L4
100 MW Line Gen A’s flow Gen B’s flow
50 MW
1-2 29 0
A 71 71A 2-3 29 35

1 5 3-4
3-5
1-5 71 0
5-4
29 Generator-load interaction
1
Load Gen A Gen B
22
L1 0 15
L2 20.4 24.6
L3
29A
2 4
64 18 L4
3
B L1
50 MW 15 MW
35 L2 L3
45 MW 40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 22

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing
L4
Line Gen A’s flow Gen B’s flow
50 MW
1-2 29 0
71A 2-3 29 35
5 3-4
3-5
1-5 71 0
5-4
Generator-load interaction
1
Load Gen A Gen B
22
L1 0 15
L2 20.4 24.6
L3
29A
2 35B 4
64 18 L4
3
B
35 MW 29A
L2 L3
45 MW 40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 23

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing
L4
Line Gen A’s flow Gen B’s flow
50 MW
1-2 29 0
71A 2-3 29 35
5 3-4 8.2 9.8
3-5 0.45 0.55
1-5 71 0
5-4
Generator-load interaction
1
Load Gen A Gen B
22
L1 0 15
L2 20.4 24.6
L3
10.4B
4 L4
18
3

8.6A L3
40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 24

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing
L4
Line Gen A’s flow Gen B’s flow
50 MW
1-2 29 0
71.45A 2-3 29 35
0.55B 5 3-4 8.2 9.8
3-5 0.45 0.55
1-5 71 0
5-4
Generator-load interaction
Load Gen A Gen B
22
L1 0 15
L2 20.4 24.6
L3
8.2A 4 L4 49.6 0.4
9.8B

L3
40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 25

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing
Line Gen A’s flow Gen B’s flow
1-2 29 0
21.85A 2-3 29 35
0.15B 5 3-4 8.2 9.8
3-5 0.45 0.55
1-5 71 0
5-4 21.85 0.15
Generator-load interaction
Load Gen A Gen B
22
L1 0 15
L2 20.4 24.6
L3
8.2A 4 L4 49.6 0.4
9.8B

L3
40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 26

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing
Line Gen A’s flow Gen B’s flow
1-2 29 0
2-3 29 35
3-4 8.2 9.8
3-5 0.45 0.55
1-5 71 0
5-4 21.85 0.15
Generator-load interaction
Load Gen A Gen B
L1 0 15
L2 20.4 24.6
L3 30.05 9.95
30.05A 4 L4 49.6 0.4
9.95B

L3
40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 27

Upstream Tracing is dual of Downstream


Tracing
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 28

Graph Theoretic Approach: Upstream


Tracing Concept
• Proved Lemma:
• A finite nodes power system without circular flows has at least one
pure sink

• Symbolic Node Elimination


• Bottoms Up Approach
• Starts at ‘Pure Sink’
• Ends at ‘Pure Source’
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 29

Downstream Algorithm: Various


Decompositions

j 40 60 k
i

30 30 40
m l n

Decomposition Formula

𝐿 𝑃𝐿𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡
Line flow decomposition 𝑃𝑙𝑚 = 𝑃𝑙𝑚
σ𝑁𝑙
𝑖=1 𝑃𝐿
𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡

𝑠 𝑟
𝑃𝐿𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡
Loss decomposition 𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑃𝑙𝑚 = (𝑃𝑙𝑚 − 𝑃𝑙𝑚 )
𝐿𝑖
σ𝑁𝑙
𝑖=1 𝑃𝐿
𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 30

Graph Theoretic Approach: Upstream


Tracing
L4
100 MW
50 MW
A 71 L1’s L2’s L3’s L4’s
Line
5 flow flow flow flow
1
1-2 0 20.4 8.3 0.3
2-3 0 45 18.3 0.7
3-4 0 0 18 0
29 3-5 0 0 0.3 0.7
1 1-5 0 0 21.7 49.3
22
5-4 0 0 22 0
Load-Generator interaction
Gen L1 L2 L3 L4
2 4 A 0 20.4 30 49.6
64 18
3 B 15 24.6 10 0.4
B L1
50 MW 15 MW
35 L2 L3
45 MW 40 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 31

Graph Theoretic Approach: Upstream


Tracing
L4
100 MW
50 MW
A 71 L1’s L2’s L3’s L4’s
Line
5 flow flow flow flow
1
1-2 0 20.4 8.3 0.3
2-3 0 45 18.3 0.7
22L3 3-4 0 0 18 0
29 3-5 0 0 0.3 0.7
1 1-5 0 0 21.7 49.3
5-4 0 0 22 0
Load-Generator interaction
Gen L1 L2 L3 L4
2 A 0 20.4 30 49.6
64
3 B 15 24.6 10 0.4
B
35 MW L2 18L3
45 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 32

Graph Theoretic Approach: Upstream


Tracing
100 MW

A
L1’s L2’s L3’s L4’s
Line
flow flow flow flow
1 21.7L3+49.3L4 1-2 0 20.4 8.3 0.3
2-3 0 45 18.3 0.7
3-4 0 0 18 0
29 3-5 0 0 0.3 0.7
1-5 0 0 21.7 49.3
5-4 0 0 22 0
Load-Generator interaction
Gen L1 L2 L3 L4
2 A 0 20.4 30 49.6
64
3 B 15 24.6 10 0.4
B
35 MW L2 18.3L3+0.7L4
45 MW
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 33

Graph Theoretic Approach: Upstream


Tracing
100 MW

A
L1’s L2’s L3’s L4’s
Line
flow flow flow flow
1 21.7L3+49.3L4 1-2 0 20.4 8.3 0.3
2-3 0 45 18.3 0.7
3-4 0 0 18 0
29 3-5 0 0 0.3 0.7
1-5 0 0 21.7 49.3
5-4 0 0 22 0
Load-Generator interaction
Gen L1 L2 L3 L4
2 A 0 20.4 30 49.6
B 15 24.6 10 0.4
B
35 MW 45L2+18.3L3+0.7L4
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 34

Graph Theoretic Approach: Downstream


Tracing
100 MW

A
L1’s L2’s L3’s L4’s
Line
flow flow flow flow
1 21.7L3+49.3L4 1-2 0 20.4 8.3 0.3
2-3 0 45 18.3 0.7
3-4 0 0 18 0
29 3-5 0 0 0.3 0.7
1-5 0 0 21.7 49.3
5-4 0 0 22 0
Load-Generator interaction
Gen L1 L2 L3 L4
2 A 0 20.4 30 49.6
B 15 24.6 10 0.4

20.4L2+8.3L3+0.3L4
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 35

Graph Theoretic Approach: Upstream


Tracing
100 MW

A
L1’s L2’s L3’s L4’s
Line
flow flow flow flow
1 20.4L2+30L3+49.6L4 1-2 0 20.4 8.3 0.3
2-3 0 45 18.3 0.7
3-4 0 0 18 0
3-5 0 0 0.3 0.7
1-5 0 0 21.7 49.3
5-4 0 0 22 0
Load-Generator interaction
Gen L1 L2 L3 L4
A 0 20.4 30 49.6
B 15 24.6 10 0.4
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 36

Attendance
• MS Teams: l6ahq8m
• Please ensure 75% of attendance for ETE.

• Deadline for term paper work: 20th April 2025


17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 38

Graph Theoretic Approach: Payment

Contributions Factors Cost (₹1000/ line) Total


cost
1-2 2-3 3-4 3-5 1-5 5-4 1-2 2-3 3-4 3-5 1-5 5-4 1-2 2-3 3-4 3-5 1-5 5-4
Gen A 29 29 8.2 0.45 71 21.85 0.50 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.50 0.50 500 227 228 225 500 497 2176
Gen B 0 35 9.8 0.55 0 0.15 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 273 272 275 0.00 3 824
L1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
L2 20.4 45 0 0 0 0 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 352 352 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 703
L3 8.3 18.3 18 0.3 21.7 22 0.14 0.14 0.50 0.15 0.15 0.50 143 143 500 150 153 500 1589
L4 0.3 0.7 0 0.7 49.3 0 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.00 5 5 0.00 350 347 0.00 708
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 39

Marginal Participation Method


• Incremental power flow change in each line is calculated
for 1 MW incremental change of demand or generation at
each node.
• Using this information, usage index for a particular time
span is calculated for each node.
• Marginal participation factor for each node is evaluated.
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 40

Marginal Participation Method


• 𝑈𝑘𝑐 = |𝐹𝑐𝑘 − 𝐹𝑐 𝑃𝑘
• 𝐹𝑐 ➔ Power flow of line ‘c’
• 𝐹𝑐𝑘 ➔ Power flow in line ‘c’ when nodal injection of bus ‘k’
is increased by 1 MW
• 𝑃𝑘 ➔ Original nodal injection at bus ‘k’
• 𝑈𝑘𝑐 ➔ Usage factor of bus ‘k’ over line ‘c’
𝑈𝑘𝑐
• 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑘𝑐 =
σ𝑘 𝑈𝑘𝑐

• Make charges proportional to 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑘𝑐


17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 41

Marginal participation method


1 MW

Change in line flow Participation factor


A
∆L A-B B-C B-D C-D A-B B-C B-D C-D
1 MW
1000₹ B 0.33 MW C D 1 0.33 0.66 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.66 0.5

500₹ C 1 0.66 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.66 0.33 0.5


B 1 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0
A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Payment for each line


Payment
D (₹)
∆L A-B B-C B-D C-D
1 MW D 333 167 133 150 783
C 333 333 67 150 883
B 333 0 0 0 333
A 0 0 0 0 0
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 42

Equivalent Bilateral Exchange Method


(EBE)
• Every generator is assumed to have share in every load
• Share is found by proportionality principle
• Requires knowledge of network parameters
• Works on DC power flow model
17-04-2025 © Deep Kiran, IIT Roorkee (2025) 43

Equivalent Bilateral Exchange Method


(EBE)
• Step 1: Obtain DC power flow solution
𝑃𝐺𝑖 𝑃𝐷𝑗
• Step 2: 𝐺𝐷𝑖𝑗 =
𝑃𝐷
• PD is total system demand (𝑃𝐷 = σ𝑗 𝑃𝐷𝑗 = σ𝑖 𝑃𝐺𝑖 )

• Step 3: Solve a DC load flow consisting of a single power


injection of GDij at bus i and the load at bus j.
𝑖𝑗 𝑖𝑗
• 𝑃𝑙𝑚 = |𝑃𝑇𝐷𝐹𝑙𝑚 |𝐺𝐷𝑖𝑗

• Step 4: The costs of the line lm can be attributed to this


equivalent bilateral exchange in linear proportion to the
usage

You might also like