Introduction

1|Page
 Introduction to the Industry
The fashion and apparel industry is one of the most dynamic and influential sectors in

the global economy, representing a complex interplay of culture, economics, innovation,

and environmental impact. Valued at over $1.7 trillion globally, this industry spans a

vast spectrum—from luxury haute couture houses and global fast fashion giants to niche,

sustainability-driven brands and local artisan markets. Fashion is not just about clothing;

it is a reflection of identity, social status, cultural trends, and personal expression. As

such, it continually evolves in response to changing consumer behaviour, technological

advancements, and global socio-economic trends.

Historically, the fashion industry was characterized by seasonal collections and a

relatively slow pace of change. Designers would release a limited number of collections

each year, typically following the spring/summer and autumn/winter cycles. However,

the advent of fast fashion in the late 20th and early 21st centuries marked a significant

shift. Retailers such as Zara, H&M, and Forever 21 began producing trendy and

inexpensive garments at breakneck speed, often moving from concept to store shelves

in a matter of weeks. This model revolutionized the industry by making fashion more

accessible to a global audience, but it also laid the foundation for a host of environmental

and ethical concerns.

The fast fashion model relies heavily on mass production, cheap labor, and a rapid

turnover of styles, which collectively contribute to significant environmental

degradation. The industry is one of the largest consumers of water globally and is

responsible for approximately 10% of total carbon emissions—more than all

international flights and maritime shipping combined. Moreover, it is estimated that the

equivalent of one garbage truck full of textiles is landfilled or incinerated every second,

highlighting the sector's contribution to global waste. The environmental cost is further

2|Page
compounded by social issues, including exploitative labor practices, poor working

conditions, and wage disparities in manufacturing hubs primarily located in developing

countries.

In recent years, increasing awareness about these issues has given rise to the concept of

sustainable fashion, which encompasses practices that aim to reduce the environmental

footprint of clothing production while promoting ethical labor practices. Sustainability

in fashion includes a wide range of strategies, such as using organic or recycled

materials, reducing water and energy consumption, implementing fair trade practices,

and promoting circular fashion models through recycling and upcycling. As the industry

faces mounting pressure from environmental groups, governments, and consumers,

sustainability has become a central focus for many brands seeking to align with evolving

values and market expectations.

This shift is particularly evident among younger consumers, especially Generation Z—

those born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s. Gen Z has emerged as a powerful

consumer segment, not only because of their purchasing power but also due to their

strong values and expectations from brands. Unlike previous generations, Gen Z is

digital-native, hyper-connected, and highly informed. They are more likely to research

brands before making a purchase and are deeply concerned about social and

environmental justice. For this cohort, fashion is not merely about style—it is a form of

activism and self-expression. They demand transparency, accountability, and

authenticity from the brands they support.

In response to this growing demand, fashion brands have increasingly adopted

sustainability claims as part of their marketing and branding strategies. These claims

often highlight eco-friendly materials, ethical sourcing, carbon neutrality, and circular

3|Page
design processes. Some companies have gone further by integrating third-party

certifications, publishing detailed sustainability reports, or engaging in visible

environmental initiatives. However, the credibility of these claims is under constant

scrutiny, as accusations of "greenwashing"—where brands exaggerate or fabricate their

environmental efforts—become more common.

For the fashion and apparel industry, sustainability claims serve a dual purpose: they act

as a marketing tool to attract ethically-minded consumers and serve as a mechanism to

future-proof the business in an increasingly eco-conscious regulatory landscape. Yet, the

actual impact of these claims on consumer purchase behavior remains a complex and

evolving question. While some consumers are deeply influenced by sustainability

messaging, others may remain skeptical or prioritize price, style, and convenience over

environmental concerns. This variability is particularly pronounced within Gen Z, where

values-driven consumption is prevalent but not always consistent in practice.

Therefore, understanding how sustainability claims affect the purchase decisions of Gen

Z consumers is both timely and critical. As this generation continues to shape the future

of retail through their preferences and values, their response to sustainability messaging

will likely determine the trajectory of the fashion industry’s environmental and ethical

transformation. Brands that fail to resonate with this cohort risk losing relevance, while

those that successfully integrate genuine and verifiable sustainability practices may gain

a competitive edge in an increasingly crowded and conscious marketplace.

4|Page
 Introduction to the Problem

The fashion and apparel industry, despite its global scale and cultural influence, is

riddled with a range of critical problems that span environmental, ethical, economic, and

social domains. As the industry continues to grow and evolve, it finds itself under

increasing scrutiny from consumers, regulators, and advocacy groups who are concerned

about its unsustainable and often exploitative practices. These challenges are particularly

relevant in the context of younger consumers, such as Generation Z, who are more

conscious of the implications of their purchases and demand higher standards from the

brands they support.

This section explores the major issues plaguing the fashion and apparel sector,

particularly focusing on the environmental degradation, ethical violations, lack of

transparency, overconsumption, and the emerging concern of greenwashing. These

problems collectively create a crisis of sustainability that requires urgent reform,

especially as consumers become more aware and vocal about corporate responsibility.

1. Environmental Degradation

One of the most pressing challenges facing the fashion industry is its substantial

environmental footprint. The sector is recognized as one of the largest polluters in the

world, contributing significantly to climate change, water scarcity, and pollution.

• Carbon Emissions: The fashion industry is responsible for about 10% of global

carbon dioxide emissions, a figure higher than the combined output of

international aviation and shipping. The production, processing, and

transportation of textiles involve the use of fossil fuels and energy-intensive

machinery, contributing directly to global warming.

5|Page
 • Water Consumption and Pollution: Textile manufacturing is extremely water-

intensive. For example, producing a single cotton shirt can require up to 2,700

liters of water. Furthermore, the dyeing and treatment of fabrics release large

amounts of toxic chemicals into freshwater bodies, particularly in countries with

lax environmental regulations. This not only pollutes water sources but also

poses severe health risks to local communities.

• Waste Generation: Fast fashion encourages frequent purchases and quick

disposal, leading to enormous textile waste. Globally, over 92 million tons of

textile waste is generated annually, much of which ends up in landfills or

incinerators. Synthetic fibers like polyester, which are not biodegradable, further

exacerbate the waste problem by persisting in the environment for centuries.

2. Labor Exploitation and Poor Working Conditions

Ethical concerns are deeply embedded in the fashion industry, particularly regarding

labor practices in the Global South, where the majority of garments are produced. To

minimize costs and maximize profits, many brands outsource manufacturing to factories

in countries like Bangladesh, India, Vietnam, and Ethiopia, where labor is cheap and

regulations are often weak or unenforced.

• Low Wages: Workers in garment factories are frequently paid below living

wages, making it difficult for them to meet basic needs. Despite working long

hours in grueling conditions, many garment workers continue to live in poverty.

• Unsafe Working Conditions: The tragic collapse of the Rana Plaza factory in

Bangladesh in 2013, which killed over 1,100 workers, brought global attention

to the unsafe conditions prevalent in many garment factories. Issues such as poor

6|Page
 ventilation, overcrowding, lack of emergency exits, and exposure to harmful

chemicals continue to plague the industry.

• Child and Forced Labor: In some regions, children are employed in the

garment supply chain, and there are also reports of forced labor, particularly in

the cotton fields of countries like Uzbekistan and the Xinjiang region in China.

3. Lack of Transparency and Supply Chain Opacity

Another critical issue in the fashion industry is the lack of transparency in supply chains.

Many brands do not disclose information about where and how their garments are made,

making it difficult for consumers and regulators to hold them accountable.

• Complex Supply Chains: The fashion supply chain involves multiple layers,

including raw material suppliers, textile mills, dye houses, garment

manufacturers, and logistics providers. This complexity often obscures the true

origin of products and the conditions under which they are produced.

• Limited Traceability: Without robust tracking systems in place, it is difficult to

verify sustainability claims made by brands. As a result, companies can

exaggerate or falsify their environmental and ethical credentials without facing

significant consequences.

4. Overconsumption and the Fast Fashion Model

The rise of fast fashion has transformed how consumers engage with clothing. Brands

like H&M, Zara, and Shein offer trendy clothing at low prices with new collections

released every few weeks. While this model has democratized fashion by making it more

affordable, it has also led to rampant overconsumption.

7|Page
 • Planned Obsolescence: Fast fashion encourages consumers to view clothing as

disposable. Items are designed with short lifespans, both in terms of quality and

style, leading to increased frequency of purchases and discards.

• Cultural Shift: The constant push for newness has fueled a culture of

materialism and instant gratification. This not only devalues craftsmanship and

quality but also puts immense pressure on environmental resources.

• Unsustainable Consumption Patterns: The average consumer today buys 60%

more clothing than they did 15 years ago, yet each item is kept for half as long.

This cycle of consumption and disposal is unsustainable and drives the industry's

negative environmental and social impacts.

5. Greenwashing and Misleading Sustainability Claims

As sustainability becomes a marketable trend, many fashion brands have responded by

incorporating eco-friendly messaging into their marketing strategies. However, not all

sustainability claims are backed by meaningful action. This phenomenon, known as

greenwashing, is increasingly problematic.

• False or Vague Claims: Brands often use terms like “eco-friendly,”

“sustainable,” or “green” without providing concrete evidence or certifications.

These vague claims can mislead consumers into thinking a product is more

environmentally or ethically sound than it actually is.

• Lack of Regulation: There is currently limited regulation around what

constitutes a “sustainable” product in fashion. This regulatory vacuum allows

brands to make unsubstantiated claims with little risk of legal repercussions.

8|Page
 • Consumer Distrust: As awareness of greenwashing grows, consumers—

especially Gen Z—are becoming more skeptical. This distrust can backfire on

brands, leading to reputational damage and a loss of consumer loyalty.

6. Global Inequality and Economic Instability

The economic structure of the fashion industry perpetuates global inequality. While large

fashion conglomerates earn billions in profits, workers in the production chain often

remain trapped in cycles of poverty.

• Unfair Profit Distribution: A significant share of the profits in the fashion

industry goes to brand owners, marketers, and retailers, while those at the bottom

of the supply chain receive a fraction of the revenue.

• Economic Vulnerability: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of

fashion supply chains, with millions of workers losing their jobs or facing

delayed wages as brands canceled orders or refused payments.

9|Page
 Importance of the study

In recent years, the intersection of sustainability and consumer behavior has become a

critical focal point in academic research, corporate strategy, and policymaking,

particularly in industries with significant environmental and social impacts—like

fashion and apparel. As the global community increasingly confronts the consequences

of climate change, environmental degradation, and unethical labor practices, industries

are being compelled to re-evaluate traditional business models in favor of more

responsible and sustainable approaches. One of the most powerful catalysts for such

change is the consumer, especially the emerging Generation Z (Gen Z), whose values

and purchasing decisions are reshaping the fashion landscape.

This study is of significant importance because it explores how sustainability claims

influence the purchasing behavior of Gen Z consumers in the fashion and apparel

industry. It addresses a timely and relevant issue by investigating whether ethical

branding and eco-conscious marketing strategies are truly effective in driving sales and

brand loyalty within this influential consumer demographic. The findings of this study

have implications not only for fashion brands and marketers but also for policymakers,

sustainability advocates, and academic researchers aiming to understand the evolving

relationship between consumer values and corporate responsibility.

1. Addressing Environmental and Social Concerns

One of the primary reasons this study is important is due to the enormous environmental

and social footprint of the fashion and apparel industry. As previously discussed, the

industry contributes significantly to global pollution, carbon emissions, water waste, and

unethical labour practices. It is imperative to understand how consumer behaviour—

specifically that of Gen Z—can either perpetuate or help mitigate these issues.

10 | P a g e
By analyzing the role sustainability claims play in purchase decisions, this research

seeks to uncover whether ethical branding is a viable tool for promoting more

responsible consumption. If Gen Z consumers are genuinely influenced by sustainability

messaging, this may encourage brands to adopt more sustainable business practices. On

the other hand, if such claims are largely ineffective or viewed as disingenuous, it could

highlight a critical gap between corporate messaging and consumer perception.

2. Understanding Gen Z: The Most Influential Consumer Group

Gen Z, comprising individuals born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, represents

a powerful force in the global marketplace. This generation is expected to make up more

than 40% of global consumers in the coming years. Unlike previous generations, Gen Z

is hyper-connected, socially aware, and highly engaged with global issues. They are

known to value authenticity, transparency, and ethical responsibility in the brands they

support.

Understanding Gen Z’s expectations and motivations is crucial for brands looking to

stay competitive and relevant in an increasingly values-driven market. This study offers

valuable insights into what Gen Z consumers look for in sustainability claims—whether

they prioritize environmental impact, fair labor practices, or transparency in supply

chains—and how these factors influence their purchase decisions. The importance of

aligning marketing strategies with Gen Z’s values cannot be overstated, as this

generation is likely to dictate future consumption patterns across industries.

3. Bridging the Gap Between Marketing and Consumer Trust

There is growing concern over the prevalence of greenwashing in the fashion industry,

where brands make misleading or exaggerated claims about their environmental efforts.
11 | P a g e
This has led to a credibility crisis, where even genuinely sustainable brands struggle to

earn consumer trust. Gen Z consumers, despite their interest in sustainability, are often

skeptical about corporate intentions and wary of superficial or deceptive messaging.

This study is important because it helps to evaluate the effectiveness and perceived

authenticity of sustainability claims from the consumer’s perspective. If these claims

are found to significantly impact purchasing behavior, it underscores the need for

accurate, evidence-based, and verifiable marketing. Conversely, if sustainability claims

are not trusted or do not influence buying behavior, it may signal the need for regulatory

oversight, clearer definitions, and third-party certifications to prevent consumer

disillusionment.

Understanding how trust is built—or lost—through sustainability communication can

help brands refine their marketing approaches and foster long-term relationships with

ethically conscious consumers.

4. Contributing to Sustainable Consumerism and Behavioral Change

Encouraging sustainable consumption patterns is a key component in achieving global

environmental goals, such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

(SDGs). However, achieving behavioral change at scale requires more than just offering

sustainable products—it requires a deep understanding of the psychological and social

factors that influence consumer decisions.

This study contributes to the broader body of knowledge on sustainable consumer

behavior by examining what drives Gen Z to choose or reject products based on

sustainability claims. It investigates whether these claims act as motivators, decision

filters, or differentiators in a crowded and competitive marketplace. By uncovering the

drivers behind eco-conscious behavior, this study supports efforts to shift consumer

12 | P a g e
mindsets toward sustainability, thus playing a role in promoting responsible

consumption on a global scale.

5. Informing Business Strategies and Innovation

Fashion companies are under increasing pressure to innovate and transition toward more

sustainable practices. However, such transitions often involve substantial investments in

new materials, technologies, supply chain adjustments, and brand repositioning.

Business leaders need reliable data on consumer preferences to justify these investments

and ensure they align with market expectations.

This study provides actionable insights into what Gen Z values in sustainability

communication and how it impacts their loyalty and purchasing choices. These insights

can inform product development, branding, pricing strategies, and customer engagement

models. For instance, if consumers respond more positively to detailed transparency

about labor practices rather than generic “eco-friendly” labels, brands can adjust their

strategies accordingly. Ultimately, this research helps bridge the gap between corporate

sustainability goals and consumer expectations.

6. Policy and Regulatory Implications

As concerns about greenwashing and environmental misinformation rise, policymakers

are beginning to consider regulations that would require greater transparency and

accountability from companies making sustainability claims. Governments and

watchdog organizations need empirical evidence to guide policy development and

enforce standards that protect consumers and the environment.

By highlighting how sustainability claims are perceived and whether they influence

behavior, this study provides a valuable foundation for future regulatory efforts. It may

inform the development of standardized labeling systems, reporting frameworks, or

13 | P a g e
consumer education campaigns aimed at fostering a more honest and informed

marketplace.

7. Supporting Academic Literature and Future Research

From an academic standpoint, this research adds depth to the relatively underexplored

intersection of sustainability marketing, generational consumer behavior, and the

fashion industry. While existing literature has examined sustainability broadly and

consumer behavior separately, there is a need for more focused research that examines

specific demographics in specific industries.

14 | P a g e
 Objectives of the Study

The study’s findings can serve as a foundation for future academic work, including

cross-generational comparisons, cross-cultural studies, and research into other industries

such as cosmetics, electronics, or food. It also contributes to theoretical models of

consumer behavior, such as the Theory of Planned Behavior or the Value-Belief-Norm

theory, by offering real-world insights from a high-impact sector.

The fashion and apparel industry is undergoing a paradigm shift in response to

increasing environmental concerns and changing consumer expectations, particularly

among younger generations. Sustainability has emerged not only as a moral imperative

but also as a strategic differentiator for brands seeking to remain relevant in a values-

driven marketplace. Among the most active and aware consumer demographics is

Generation Z (Gen Z)—individuals born roughly between the mid-1990s and early

2010s—who are known for their environmental consciousness, digital fluency, and

insistence on authenticity and transparency from the brands they support.

In response to growing consumer pressure, many fashion brands have started to

incorporate sustainability claims in their marketing and product labeling. These claims

may include references to eco-friendly materials, ethical labor practices, reduced carbon

emissions, recycling initiatives, or third-party certifications. However, the effectiveness

of such claims in influencing actual purchasing decisions remains unclear. Are Gen Z

consumers truly motivated by sustainability messages, or are these claims lost amid a

sea of marketing noise? Do they differentiate between genuine efforts and

greenwashing?

The overarching aim of this study is to investigate the impact of sustainability claims

on the purchasing decisions of Gen Z consumers in the fashion and apparel industry.

15 | P a g e
This includes evaluating the awareness, perception, trust, and behavioral responses of

Gen Z toward sustainability-related branding and messaging.

To achieve this aim, the study outlines a set of specific, measurable, and research-

driven objectives, which are elaborated below.

Primary Objective

To evaluate the influence of sustainability claims on the purchasing decisions of

Gen Z consumers in the fashion and apparel industry.

These primary objective forms the foundation of the research. It seeks to determine

whether sustainability-related marketing influences consumer behavior within this

specific demographic. The study will explore the psychological, emotional, and

cognitive factors that drive purchasing decisions when sustainability is highlighted as a

brand value or product attribute.

Secondary Objectives

To support and further clarify the primary objective, the study identifies the following

secondary objectives:

1. To assess Gen Z consumers’ level of awareness and understanding of

sustainability concepts in fashion.

Awareness is the first step toward responsible consumption. This objective will examine

whether Gen Z consumers are familiar with concepts such as ethical fashion, slow

fashion, circular economy, carbon-neutral manufacturing, and sustainable supply chains.

It will also assess the role of education, media, and social platforms in shaping this

understanding.

• Are they aware of the negative environmental and social impacts of fast fashion?

16 | P a g e
 • Do they understand the terminology used in sustainability marketing?

• Does awareness correlate with a greater likelihood of sustainable purchasing?

2. To explore how Gen Z consumers perceive sustainability claims made by fashion

brands.

Perception influences behavior. This objective seeks to analyze how Gen Z interprets

sustainability-related messages. Are such claims viewed as authentic and trustworthy, or

are they dismissed as marketing ploys?

This includes:

• How Gen Z distinguishes between greenwashing and genuine sustainability

• Whether certification logos and labels (e.g., Fair Trade, GOTS, OEKO-TEX)

enhance credibility

• The role of influencers and online reviews in shaping brand perception

3. To evaluate the degree of trust Gen Z consumers, place in sustainability claims

across different types of fashion brands (e.g., fast fashion, luxury, indie brands).

Trust is critical in shaping purchasing intent. Consumers may be skeptical of large

corporations engaging in sustainability campaigns if their past practices suggest

otherwise. This objective explores:

• How brand reputation influences trust in sustainability messaging

• Whether smaller, independent brands are perceived as more sincere in their

sustainability efforts

• The impact of transparency in supply chain reporting and corporate

responsibility disclosures

17 | P a g e
4. To identify the key sustainability factors that influence Gen Z's purchasing

decisions (e.g., ethical labor, eco-friendly materials, carbon footprint, recycling

initiatives).

Sustainability is multi-faceted. This objective breaks down which elements of

sustainability resonate most with Gen Z and influence their buying decisions:

• Do they care more about labor ethics or environmental impact?

• Are they willing to compromise on price or style for sustainable attributes?

• Which types of claims (e.g., “Made with recycled materials” vs. “100% carbon

neutral”) are most persuasive?

5. To analyze the gap between Gen Z’s stated values and their actual purchasing

behavior (the attitude-behavior gap).

There is often a disconnect between what consumers say and what they do. While many

Gen Z individuals claim to value sustainability, their actual purchases may be influenced

more by price, style, or convenience. This objective explores:

• The prevalence of this "attitude-behavior gap"

• Psychological or situational factors that lead to compromises in sustainable

choices

• Whether sustainable products are accessible and affordable enough for Gen Z

6. To examine the role of digital media and social influencers in shaping Gen Z’s

perceptions of sustainable fashion.

18 | P a g e
Gen Z is heavily influenced by social media platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and

YouTube. Influencers, content creators, and viral trends often shape their fashion

choices. This objective seeks to understand:

• How online content affects Gen Z’s perception of sustainability

• The impact of influencer endorsements of sustainable fashion

• Whether social media fosters critical thinking about greenwashing or reinforces

brand loyalty

7. To determine the willingness of Gen Z consumers to pay a premium for

sustainably produced apparel.

Sustainable products often come with higher price tags due to ethical labor practices and

eco-friendly materials. This objective investigates:

• Whether Gen Z consumers are willing to pay more for such products

• What price premium they consider acceptable

• Whether income level or socioeconomic background influences willingness to

pay

8. To provide recommendations for fashion brands on how to improve their

sustainability communication to better appeal to Gen Z consumers.

Based on all the insights gathered, this objective focuses on practical outcomes. It aims

to offer:

• Guidelines for authentic sustainability messaging

• Strategies to build trust and engagement with Gen Z

19 | P a g e
 • Best practices for avoiding greenwashing

• Communication channels that are most effective for reaching Gen Z

Significance and Practical Application of the Objectives

Achieving these objectives will generate valuable insights for multiple stakeholders:

• For Fashion Brands: The findings can help brands design marketing strategies

that align with Gen Z’s values, enhancing brand loyalty and market share.

• For Marketers: Understanding what drives Gen Z’s decisions allows for more

targeted, efficient, and ethical advertising practices.

• For Policy Makers: Results could inform regulatory frameworks that

standardize sustainability claims and protect consumers from misinformation.

• For Academia: The research adds depth to sustainability literature and consumer

psychology, supporting future studies in related fields.

• For Gen Z Consumers: Awareness of the mechanisms behind sustainability

claims may empower them to make more informed and impactful decisions.

Scope of the Study

1. Industry Focus: Fashion and Apparel

This study is confined to the fashion and apparel industry, specifically concentrating

on consumer garments and accessories. It encompasses both fast fashion and

sustainable fashion brands, as these segments actively engage with Generation Z

consumers and frequently use sustainability-related marketing. The scope excludes other

fashion-related categories such as cosmetics, lifestyle accessories (like perfumes or bags

20 | P a g e
unless integral to a clothing line), or luxury collectible items, to maintain focus on

mainstream wearable fashion.

The emphasis is on understanding how sustainability claims are utilized by fashion

brands and how these messages influence Gen Z consumers' buying behavior. Brands

operating in physical retail as well as online e-commerce platforms are considered

within this scope. The growing presence of digital-native brands that market themselves

through social media and influencer culture is also included, as these companies often

engage directly with Gen Z audiences and use sustainability as a brand value.

2. Consumer Demographic Focus: Generation Z

The research is focused exclusively on Generation Z (Gen Z)—consumers born

approximately between 1995 and 2012. This demographic has been selected because of

its distinct consumer characteristics, including tech-savviness, social awareness, and

strong opinions on sustainability, inclusivity, and ethical branding.

The study spans a range of individuals within this cohort, from teenagers (approximately

13 years and above) to young adults in their mid to late 20s. These individuals are either

already active consumers or in the process of establishing long-term purchasing habits.

The study includes Gen Z individuals across different income levels, educational

backgrounds, and gender identities, reflecting the inclusive and diverse nature of the

generation itself.

The scope excludes direct comparisons with other generational cohorts, such as

Millennials or Generation Alpha. While references to generational contrast may appear

in the literature or context, the data collection, analysis, and interpretation are limited to

Gen Z alone.

3. Geographic Boundaries
21 | P a g e
The study is geographically limited to one or more specific regions or countries,

depending on feasibility, data access, and the researcher's location or institutional

affiliation. Countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia,

or India are often selected for such research due to high Gen Z engagement, an active

fashion market, and growing discourse around sustainability.

A single-country focus helps create a clear, culturally and economically contextualized

understanding of consumer behavior. Regional variations such as urban vs. rural

consumption behavior, educational background, or exposure to sustainability campaigns

may be acknowledged within the selected country, but cross-country comparisons are

outside the study's boundaries.

4. Thematic Coverage: Sustainability Claims in Fashion

This study focuses specifically on sustainability claims used by fashion brands, which

include both environmental and ethical messaging. The types of sustainability claims

considered within the scope include:

• Environmental claims: “Made from recycled materials,” “organic cotton,”

“carbon-neutral production,” “zero waste packaging,” “biodegradable fabrics.”

• Ethical labor claims: “Fair wages,” “ethically made,” “no child labor,” “safe

working conditions,” “locally sourced.”

• Third-party certifications: Labels like GOTS (Global Organic Textile

Standard), Fair Trade, B Corp, Cradle to Cradle, or OEKO-TEX®.

• Broader brand messaging: Company-wide sustainability missions, green

fashion lines, or content that promotes conscious consumption.

22 | P a g e
The study investigates how these messages are perceived, trusted, and acted upon by

Gen Z consumers. Claims made through product labels, website content, social media,

and advertisements are included. The scope does not verify the scientific or factual

accuracy of these sustainability claims but instead analyzes how consumers interpret and

respond to them.

5. Behavioral Focus: Purchase Decision-Making

The research centers on the purchasing behavior of Gen Z in response to sustainability

claims. This includes examining how such claims affect:

• Initial interest in a product or brand

• Evaluation and comparison of sustainable vs. non-sustainable options

• Final purchase decision

The study does not extensively focus on post-purchase behavior such as satisfaction,

resale, upcycling, or brand advocacy, although some overlap may occur in participant

responses. Additionally, other consumer actions like renting fashion, thrifting, or

supporting resale platforms may be mentioned contextually but are not primary research

targets.

The analysis concentrates on what motivates or hinders a sustainable fashion purchase,

including factors like pricing, availability, style preference, brand reputation, and

credibility of sustainability messaging.

6. Communication Channels Examined

Within this study, the communication of sustainability claims through various

marketing channels is considered. These include:

23 | P a g e
 • Brand websites and e-commerce platforms

• Product packaging and labels

• Social media marketing (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, etc.)

• Influencer endorsements

• Digital advertising campaigns and sustainability-focused blogs

These channels are analyzed in terms of how effectively they communicate

sustainability, whether they build trust, and how they influence consumer perception and

decision-making. Traditional media channels (TV, newspapers, magazines) are largely

excluded due to Gen Z's lower engagement with these platforms.

7. Methodological Scope

The study employs a mixed-method approach combining both quantitative and

qualitative research methods. These may include:

• Structured surveys to measure awareness, attitudes, and purchasing behavior

in response to sustainability claims.

• In-depth interviews or focus groups to explore the thought processes, values,

and experiences of Gen Z participants.

• Content analysis of selected brand messages or social media posts for how

sustainability is framed.

This dual approach allows for a nuanced understanding of both broad behaviouralqq

trends and deeper, subjective interpretations of sustainability claims. The research does

not include experimental designs, longitudinal tracking, or ethnographic fieldwork due

to time and resource constraints.

24 | P a g e
8. Time Frame

The data collected for the study reflects current and recent consumer behaviour,

focusing primarily on trends and attitudes from the past 1–2 years. This ensures

relevance to the rapidly changing landscape of sustainability, fashion trends, and digital

media influence.

The study does not aim to provide a historical overview of sustainability in fashion,

though references may be made to recent industry shifts or events (such as the post-

pandemic boom in online fashion or the rise of second-hand platforms) where relevant

to understanding consumer attitudes.

9. Limitations and Exclusions

To maintain a manageable and focused scope, the study excludes:

• Comparative analysis across generations (e.g., Millennials vs. Gen Z)

• Scientific validation of sustainability claims (e.g., verifying whether “organic

cotton” is genuinely organic)

• In-depth financial analysis of fashion brands' sustainability investments or

return on sustainable innovation

• Operational or supply chain assessments of sustainability practices

• Broader lifestyle sustainability behaviour (e.g., eco-friendly housing,

veganism)

These boundaries help the study stay aligned with its central purpose: analysing how

sustainability messaging influences Gen Z purchase behaviour in fashion.

25 | P a g e
Literature Review

26 | P a g e
1. Eco-friendly Fashion Among Generation Z: Mixed-Methods Study

on Price Value Image, Customer Fulfillment, and Pro-environmental

Behavior

A study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public

Health explores Generation Z's attitudes towards eco-friendly fashion. The research

indicates that Generation Z is increasingly aware of environmental issues and is more

likely to support sustainable brands. However, the study also highlights that factors such

as price sensitivity and brand image play significant roles in their purchasing decisions.

2. Green Branding in Fast Fashion: Examining the Impact of Social

Sustainability Claims on Chinese Consumer Behaviour and Brand

Perception

Research in the International Journal of Consumer Studies examines how green

branding and social sustainability claims influence consumer behavior in China. The

study finds that a positive green brand image enhances consumer satisfaction and

purchase intentions, underscoring the importance of authentic sustainability messaging.

3. Is Generation Z More Inclined Than Generation Y to Purchase

Sustainable Clothing?

A comparative study published in Social Indicators Research investigates whether

Generation Z is more inclined than Generation Y to purchase sustainable clothing. The

findings suggest that Generation Z is more likely to buy second-hand clothing, while

Generation Y shows a preference for organic and eco-sustainable fabrics. This indicates

a shift towards more sustainable consumption patterns among younger consumers.

27 | P a g e
4. Factors That Influence Consumers’ Sustainable Apparel Purchase

Intention: The Moderating Effect of Generational Cohorts

An article in Sustainability identifies various factors, including emotional, functional,

and environmental values, that influence sustainable apparel purchase intentions. The

study highlights the moderating effect of generational cohorts, indicating that

Generation Z's purchase intentions are significantly shaped by these values.

5. Are Consumers Equally Willing to Pay More for Brands That Aim

for Sustainability, Positive Societal Contribution, and Inclusivity as for

Brands That Are Perceived as Exclusive?

Research published in Sustainability examines consumers' willingness to pay a premium

for brands that promote sustainability and inclusivity. The study finds that Generation Z

is more inclined to support brands that align with their values, suggesting that

sustainability claims can positively impact purchase decisions.

6. Generation Z Members Say They Want Sustainable Clothes but Buy

Fast Fashion Instead – New Research

A study by Sheffield Hallam University reveals a discrepancy between Generation Z's

stated preference for sustainable clothing and their actual purchasing behavior. The

research suggests that factors like affordability and trendiness often outweigh

sustainability considerations in their purchase decisions.

28 | P a g e
7. Gen Z Supports Sustainability – And Fuels Ultra-Fast Fashion

An article in The Fashion Law discusses the paradox of Generation Z supporting

sustainability while contributing to the rise of ultra-fast fashion. The study highlights the

complexities surrounding Gen Z's shopping habits and how these often fail to align with

their values.

8. Driving Green Consumption: Exploring Generation Z Consumers’

Action Issues on Sustainable Fashion in China

Research published in Studies in Social Science & Humanities explores how

environmental knowledge and corporate social responsibility (CSR) through social

media influence Generation Z's sustainable fashion consumption in China. The study

finds that these factors positively impact Gen Z's purchase intentions for sustainable

fashion products.

9. Gen Z Consumer Inspired by Sustainability and Self-Expression

A report by Depop and Bain & Company examines how Generation Z's shopping

behaviors are influenced by brands' commitments to social and environmental

sustainability. The study finds that Gen Z consumers are concerned about consumption,

sustainability, and self-expression, and they seek brands that align with these values.

10. Investigating the Determinants of Behavioral Intentions of

Generation Z for Recycled Clothing

An article in Young Consumers investigates the influence of environmental concern,

perceived value, personal norms, and willingness to pay on Generation Z's purchase

intention for recycled clothing. The study finds that these factors significantly influence

29 | P a g e
Gen Z's purchase intentions, with willingness to pay and environmental concern being

major predictors.

11. Gen Z is Demanding Ethical, Environmentally Friendly Fashion

Brands

An article in The Financial Express discusses how Generation Z is demanding ethical,

environmentally friendly fashion brands. The study highlights that Generation Z

recognizes the responsibility of garment manufacturers to address social and ecological

challenges and expects brands to take action.

12. How is Gen Z and Climate Change Affecting Consumer Behavior

in 2024?

A blog post by Generation ZALPHA examines how Generation Z's expectations from

brands regarding sustainability and addressing climate change are affecting consumer

behavior. The post highlights that Gen Z demands transparency, accountability, concrete

action, innovation, and collaboration from brands to address climate change.

13. Cheap, Cool and Kind to Nature: How Secondhand Became UK

Fashion's Main Attraction

An article in The Guardian discusses the rising popularity of secondhand fashion in the

UK, driven by factors such as sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and uniqueness. The

study finds that Generation Z's environmental consciousness and desire for self-

expression have significantly contributed to this trend.

30 | P a g e
14. Hypocritical Gen Z Can't Stop Buying This Planet-Destroying

Product: Study

An article in the New York Post examines the contradiction between Generation Z's eco-

conscious values and their purchasing habits, particularly regarding fast fashion. The

study suggests that while many Gen Z consumers express a desire for sustainable

products, economic factors and social media trends often lead them to choose

environmentally harmful options.

15. Meet PANGAIA, a Gen-Z-Loved Fashion Brand Fusing Science

and Style

An article in the New York Post profiles PANGAIA, a fashion brand popular among

Generation Z for its sustainable, earth-positive approach to clothing. The study

highlights how the brand's use of innovative materials and commitment to sustainability

resonate with Gen Z consumers.

31 | P a g e
Research Methodology

32 | P a g e
The research methodology is a crucial part of the study as it outlines the process by

which data will be collected and analyzed to assess the impact of sustainability claims

on Generation Z consumers’ purchase decisions in the fashion and apparel industry. The

methodology will be divided into three main sections: Research Design, Sampling

Design, and Data Collection Methods and Tools.

i. Research Design

1. Overview of Research Design:

Research design refers to the framework or blueprint that outlines the procedures for

collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data. In this study, a quantitative and qualitative

research design will be adopted to comprehensively assess the impact of sustainability

claims on the purchasing behavior of Generation Z in the fashion and apparel industry.

• Quantitative Approach: A quantitative approach will allow us to measure the

correlation between sustainability claims and consumer behavior. By using

structured surveys, we can generate numerical data that will help identify

patterns and relationships between various variables.

• Qualitative Approach: A qualitative approach will be used to gain deeper

insights into consumer perceptions, attitudes, and motivations regarding

sustainable fashion. This approach will help understand the "why" behind their

purchase decisions, adding richness to the numerical data.

The mixed-methods design will combine both approaches to provide a holistic

understanding of the impact of sustainability claims on purchase behavior.

2. Type of Research:

33 | P a g e
This research will follow an explanatory research design, which aims to identify

relationships between variables and explain the underlying factors influencing

Generation Z’s purchase decisions. The focus is to establish whether and to what extent

sustainability claims influence the purchasing decisions of Generation Z in the fashion

and apparel industry.

3. Research Paradigm:

• Positivism Paradigm (Quantitative Part): This research will employ the

positivist paradigm, which focuses on objectivity, observable facts, and

statistical data. The goal is to use empirical data to identify patterns and

correlations.

• Interpretivism Paradigm (Qualitative Part): The qualitative part of the

research will utilize the interpretivism paradigm, which emphasizes

understanding human behavior and experiences from the participants' point of

view. It will allow the researchers to gain insights into the personal and subjective

experiences of Generation Z consumers when it comes to sustainable fashion.

4. Research Questions and Hypotheses:

• Research Questions:

1. How do sustainability claims affect Generation Z's purchase decisions in

the fashion and apparel industry?

2. What factors (such as price, brand image, environmental concerns, etc.)

mediate the relationship between sustainability claims and purchase

intentions?

34 | P a g e
 3. How do Generation Z consumers perceive sustainability claims in the

context of fashion and apparel?

• Hypotheses:

1. H1: Sustainability claims positively influence Generation Z’s purchase

decisions in the fashion industry.

2. H2: The perceived authenticity of sustainability claims positively

impacts Generation Z's purchasing intentions.

3. H3: Price sensitivity moderates the impact of sustainability claims on

purchase behavior among Generation Z consumers.

5. Conceptual Framework:

A conceptual framework will be developed to visually represent the variables and their

relationships. It will include:

• Independent Variable: Sustainability Claims (such as eco-friendly materials,

ethical labor practices, sustainable production processes).

• Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision (purchase intention, willingness to pay

more, actual purchase behavior).

• Moderating Variables: Price Sensitivity, Brand Perception, Social Influence,

etc.

• Mediating Variables: Consumer Knowledge, Perceived Authenticity,

Environmental Concerns, etc.

35 | P a g e
 ii. Sampling Design

1. Population:

The target population for this study will consist of Generation Z consumers who are

within the age group of 18 to 24 years. Generation Z is characterized by their familiarity

with technology, social media, and an increased awareness of environmental issues. This

group is also highly active in fashion consumption, making them an ideal segment for

this research.

The fashion and apparel industry will be the focus, specifically consumers who have

made at least one purchase of fashion-related products within the last six months. The

target population will be diverse in terms of demographics, including individuals from

various income groups, educational backgrounds, and geographic locations.

2. Sample Size:

To ensure statistical reliability and generalizability, the study will aim for a sample size

of approximately 500 to 1,000 participants. This sample size is sufficient to draw

meaningful conclusions and ensure a diverse representation of Generation Z consumers.

3. Sampling Method:

• Probability Sampling: A stratified random sampling technique will be used

to ensure that different subgroups of Generation Z consumers are represented.

These subgroups will include different age groups (18–20, 21–24), genders,

geographic regions (urban, suburban, rural), and income levels. Stratified

random sampling ensures that the sample is more representative of the

population, which improves the external validity of the results.

36 | P a g e
 • Non-Probability Sampling: A convenience sampling method will be employed

for the qualitative phase of the research (e.g., in-depth interviews or focus

groups). This method will involve selecting participants based on their

availability and willingness to participate, which helps gather insights quickly

from a diverse group of consumers.

4. Inclusion Criteria:

• Respondents must be within the age range of 18-24 years (Generation Z).

• Respondents should have purchased fashion or apparel products within the last

six months.

• Respondents should be familiar with the concept of sustainability claims in

fashion (e.g., eco-friendly fabrics, ethical sourcing).

5. Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants outside the 18-24 age range.

• Individuals who do not purchase fashion products frequently or have no interest

in fashion-related purchases.

• Participants who are unaware of sustainability practices in the fashion industry.

6. Sampling Frame:

The sampling frame will consist of online platforms, fashion e-commerce websites,

and social media platforms where Generation Z consumers are active. Platforms like

Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube will be utilized for outreach to potential participants.

37 | P a g e
 iii. Data Collection Methods and Tools

1. Data Collection Methods:

This study will employ two main data collection methods:

• Quantitative Data Collection:

o Surveys/Questionnaires: A structured questionnaire will be developed

and distributed online. The survey will include a mix of closed-ended

questions (Likert scale, multiple choice, dichotomous) to capture

consumer preferences, perceptions, and behaviors. The questions will be

designed to assess variables like sustainability claims, purchase

intentions, and factors that influence buying decisions (e.g., price

sensitivity, brand perception).

o Online Survey Tools: Platforms like Google Forms, SurveyMonkey,

or Qualtrics will be used to administer the surveys. These platforms offer

a range of tools for customizing the questionnaire and collecting

responses efficiently.

• Qualitative Data Collection:

o Interviews: Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subset

of survey participants. The interviews will explore deeper insights into

the reasons behind their decisions regarding sustainable fashion and their

attitudes toward sustainability claims.

o Focus Groups: Small focus groups (5-8 participants) will be conducted,

where participants will discuss their views on sustainable fashion,

38 | P a g e
 sustainability claims in the apparel industry, and the factors that influence

their purchase decisions.

2. Data Collection Tools:

• Survey/Questionnaire Design: The survey will be designed to capture various

dimensions of consumer behavior:

1. Demographic Information: Age, gender, income level, education level,

and location.

2. Sustainability Awareness: Questions will assess how well participants

understand sustainability claims and their relevance in the fashion

industry.

3. Perceived Authenticity of Sustainability Claims: Likert scale

questions will gauge how authentic participants perceive sustainability

claims to be from different brands.

4. Purchase Behavior and Intentions: Questions will ask about past

purchases of sustainable fashion, willingness to pay a premium for eco-

friendly products, and frequency of sustainable purchases.

5. Factors Affecting Purchase Decisions: Price sensitivity, brand loyalty,

social influence (e.g., influencers), and environmental concerns will be

explored.

• Interview Guide: For the qualitative data collection, an interview guide will be

prepared. This guide will include open-ended questions such as:

1. What factors influence your decision to purchase sustainable fashion

products?

39 | P a g e
 2. How do you evaluate the sustainability claims made by fashion brands?

3. How do you feel about paying more for eco-friendly fashion items?

• Focus Group Discussion Guide: The focus group discussions will be guided by

specific topics such as:

1. How do you perceive sustainability claims in the fashion industry?

2. Do you think that fashion brands are genuinely sustainable or are they

just using sustainability as a marketing tool?

3. What role does social media play in influencing your purchasing

decisions regarding sustainable fashion?

3. Data Collection Process:

• Survey Distribution: The survey will be distributed through online channels,

including social media, email newsletters, and fashion e-commerce websites.

• Interviews and Focus Groups: Interviews will be conducted virtually via

platforms like Zoom or in person, depending on participant preferences and

geographic limitations.

4. Ethical Considerations:

• Informed Consent: All participants will be informed about the study’s purpose,

their voluntary participation, and their right to confidentiality.

• Privacy Protection: Personal information collected will be kept confidential,

and all data will be anonymized for analysis.

• Right to Withdraw: Participants will be informed that they can withdraw from

the study at any time without facing any negative consequences.

40 | P a g e
Data Presentation and
Analysis

41 | P a g e
In any research study, the effective presentation and analysis of data are critical for

drawing meaningful conclusions. This section outlines the approach to Data

Presentation and Data Analysis for the study on the Impact of Sustainability Claims

on Purchase Decisions of Gen Z Consumers in the Fashion and Apparel Industry.

This section provides clarity on how the data will be organized, presented, and analyzed

to ensure that the findings are accurately interpreted and easy to understand.

i. Data Presentation

1. Overview of Data Presentation

Data presentation is the process of organizing, summarizing, and displaying data in a

structured way. The aim is to present data clearly and concisely to facilitate

understanding and to ensure that the findings are easy to interpret. Effective data

presentation enables researchers, stakeholders, and readers to visualize trends and

patterns, making it easier to draw conclusions.

In this research study, data presentation will involve both descriptive and graphical

representations. The data will be organized based on the research objectives and the

variables identified in the conceptual framework.

2. Types of Data Collected

As mentioned earlier, this study employs a mixed-methods approach, consisting of both

quantitative and qualitative data collection. The data collected will be from surveys,

interviews, and focus groups. Below is a breakdown of how data from each method will

be presented:

Quantitative Data Presentation:

42 | P a g e
Quantitative data will be primarily presented using tables, charts, and graphs. This will

allow the data to be clearly visualized and easily interpreted.

• Descriptive Statistics: Descriptive statistics will provide an overview of the key

demographic characteristics of the respondents, such as age, gender, income, and

geographic location. This will include measures like:

o Frequency distributions (e.g., how many respondents fall into each

demographic category)

o Means and standard deviations (e.g., to describe the average responses

for key variables such as sustainability awareness, purchase intention,

etc.)

• Cross-tabulation: Cross-tabulation will be used to examine the relationship

between two or more categorical variables. For example, the relationship

between age groups and willingness to pay more for sustainable fashion can

be explored.

• Charts and Graphs: Data will be presented in bar charts, pie charts, histograms,

and line graphs to make the information visually accessible. For example:

o Bar Charts: These can be used to present data about the perceived

authenticity of sustainability claims across different brands.

o Pie Charts: These can display the percentage of respondents who

consider sustainability important when making a fashion purchase.

o Histograms: To display the frequency distribution of responses about

consumers' willingness to pay a premium for sustainable fashion.

43 | P a g e
 o Scatter Plots: These can be used to represent relationships between

continuous variables, such as price sensitivity and purchase intention.

• Correlation Matrix: A correlation matrix will be presented to show the strength

and direction of relationships between variables. For example, correlations can

be assessed between sustainability awareness and purchase intention, or between

price sensitivity and willingness to pay more for eco-friendly products.

Qualitative Data Presentation:

Qualitative data will be presented in the form of themes and narrative descriptions.

The data will be organized into meaningful patterns that reflect respondents' opinions,

insights, and behaviors regarding sustainability claims and their purchase decisions.

• Theme Identification: Thematic analysis will be employed to analyze the

interview and focus group data. Themes will be derived from key topics, such

as:

o Perceptions of sustainability claims: How respondents evaluate the

authenticity of claims.

o Environmental consciousness: The role of environmental concerns in

influencing purchase decisions.

o Influence of social media: The role of influencers and peer pressure in

shaping purchasing behavior.

o Price sensitivity: How cost concerns affect the decision to purchase

sustainable fashion.

• Quotes and Excerpts: Relevant quotes or excerpts from interviewees and focus

group participants will be presented to support the identified themes. These

44 | P a g e
 qualitative insights will add depth to the quantitative data and provide a richer

understanding of consumer behavior.

• Word Clouds and Visuals: To provide an at-a-glance overview of the most

frequently mentioned concepts and themes, word clouds or similar visual tools

can be used. These visualizations will highlight the most frequently discussed

factors in relation to sustainable fashion and purchase behavior.

ii. Data Analysis

1. Overview of Data Analysis

Data analysis is the process of inspecting, cleaning, transforming, and modeling data

with the goal of discovering useful information, forming conclusions, and supporting

decision-making. The analysis in this research will be performed separately for the

quantitative and qualitative data to derive meaningful insights. It will help to test the

research hypotheses and answer the research questions.

The quantitative data analysis will focus on statistical tests, while the qualitative data

analysis will involve thematic coding and interpretation.

Quantitative Data Analysis:

• Descriptive Analysis: The first step in the quantitative data analysis will be to

calculate descriptive statistics for all key variables in the study. This includes:

o Frequencies and Percentages for categorical data (e.g., gender, income

group, awareness of sustainability claims).

o Mean, Median, and Standard Deviation for continuous variables (e.g.,

the level of agreement with sustainability claims, willingness to pay

more).
45 | P a g e
• Reliability Analysis:

o A Cronbach’s Alpha test will be conducted to assess the internal

consistency of the survey scales used to measure attitudes toward

sustainability claims and purchase intentions. A reliability score of 0.7 or

higher would indicate that the survey items are reliably measuring the

same construct.

• Inferential Statistics: Inferential statistics will be used to test the research

hypotheses and explore relationships between different variables. This will

include:

o T-tests/ANOVA: These tests will be used to compare means across

different groups, such as comparing sustainability awareness between

different age groups or assessing the difference in purchase intention

based on gender.

o Correlation Analysis: Pearson’s correlation coefficient will be used to

measure the strength and direction of relationships between continuous

variables, such as the relationship between sustainability awareness and

willingness to pay more.

o Multiple Regression Analysis: This technique will be employed to

assess the impact of independent variables (e.g., sustainability claims,

price sensitivity, social influence) on the dependent variable (purchase

intention). Multiple regression allows for the identification of significant

predictors of consumer behavior while controlling for other variables.

o Path Analysis/Structural Equation Modeling (SEM): If the study aims

to analyze more complex relationships between multiple independent and

46 | P a g e
 dependent variables, SEM can be used. This technique would help to test

a theoretical model where sustainability claims, price sensitivity, and

brand perception interact to influence purchase decisions.

• Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses will be tested based on the analysis of variance,

regression models, or correlation coefficients. For example:

o H1: Sustainability claims positively influence Generation Z’s purchase

decisions in the fashion industry.

o H2: The perceived authenticity of sustainability claims positively

impacts Generation Z's purchasing intentions.

o H3: Price sensitivity moderates the impact of sustainability claims on

purchase behavior among Generation Z consumers.

Qualitative Data Analysis:

• Thematic Analysis: Thematic analysis will be used to identify, analyze, and

report patterns (themes) within the qualitative data. The analysis process will

involve:

1. Familiarization with the Data: Reading through the interview and

focus group transcripts to get an overall sense of the content.

2. Coding: The data will be coded to identify key ideas and recurring topics.

For example, if multiple participants mention "price sensitivity," it will

be coded as a theme.

3. Theme Development: Themes will be developed based on recurring

patterns, such as “authenticity of sustainability claims,” “peer influence,”

and “environmental concerns.”

47 | P a g e
 4. Theme Interpretation: Once themes are identified, the researcher will

interpret the meanings of these themes, linking them to existing literature

and the research objectives.

• Coding Process: Each response from the interviews or focus groups will be

assigned a code that represents a particular idea or response. For example:

o Code “Sustainability Concerns” might represent all responses related to

environmental consciousness.

o Code “Brand Perception” might represent responses about how

consumers view brands that make sustainability claims.

• NVivo or Atlas.ti: These qualitative data analysis tools can assist in organizing

and analyzing large amounts of textual data, enabling efficient coding and theme

identification.

Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Data:

• Triangulation: By integrating both quantitative and qualitative data,

triangulation will be performed to compare the findings from both sets of data.

The goal is to ensure consistency and validity by cross-checking findings from

the surveys and interviews/focus groups. For example, if both quantitative data

(such as a high correlation between sustainability claims and purchase intention)

and qualitative data (such as interviewees emphasizing authenticity in

sustainability claims) show similar trends, the findings will be considered more

robust.

• Visualization of Findings: The visualization of findings in any research study

is pivotal for making the data both comprehensible and insightful. In the case of

48 | P a g e
 this study on the impact of sustainability claims on Generation Z's purchase

decisions in the fashion and apparel industry, effective visualization is necessary

to convey the complexities of both quantitative and qualitative data. Combining

visual aids such as charts, graphs, and narrative insights allows for a more

holistic understanding of consumer behavior. It enables researchers and

stakeholders to identify trends, relationships, and patterns clearly, which is

essential for drawing valid conclusions from the data.

• For the quantitative data collected through surveys, various visual tools such as

bar charts, pie charts, histograms, and scatter plots will be employed. Bar charts,

for example, will be used to illustrate the frequency or proportion of responses

related to sustainability claims. For instance, a bar chart could visually depict

how many Gen Z consumers consider sustainability a key factor in their purchase

decisions, allowing for a quick comparison between different groups. Pie charts

can further enhance this understanding by showing the percentage distribution

of responses—whether consumers believe sustainability claims are very

important, somewhat important, or not important at all.

• In addition to categorical data, histograms will be helpful for visualizing

continuous data, such as the range of prices that consumers are willing to pay for

sustainable fashion. By grouping responses into price bands, histograms allow

us to clearly display trends in consumers' price sensitivity and how it correlates

with their sustainability preferences. Furthermore, scatter plots will help to

explore relationships between two continuous variables, such as the correlation

between consumers' awareness of sustainability claims and their willingness to

spend more on sustainable fashion. Scatter plots provide a visual representation

of how these variables move in tandem, making it easier to identify any patterns.

49 | P a g e
• To assess correlations between multiple variables, a correlation matrix will be

used. This tool will allow for the examination of the strength and direction of

relationships between various factors, such as sustainability awareness, purchase

intention, and social influence. For example, the correlation matrix could

indicate whether there is a strong positive relationship between the perception of

authenticity in sustainability claims and the likelihood of purchasing eco-friendly

products.

• On the qualitative side, data derived from interviews and focus groups will be

analyzed thematically, and key findings will be presented using word clouds,

thematic diagrams, and direct quotes. Word clouds provide a simple yet powerful

way to visualize the most frequently mentioned themes, such as “authenticity”

or “environmental impact,” helping to summarize large amounts of textual data

in an easily digestible format. Thematic diagrams will be used to organize key

themes, such as the role of social media or price sensitivity, and illustrate how

these themes connect and influence one another. Additionally, relevant quotes

from interviewees will serve to support the findings, offering deeper insights into

Gen Z’s motivations and concerns regarding sustainability claims in fashion.

• By integrating both quantitative and qualitative data, the research findings will

be presented in a comprehensive and clear manner. For instance, if the

quantitative analysis shows a significant relationship between sustainability

claims and purchase intention, qualitative insights can explain why that

relationship exists, providing a deeper context. This combined approach will

ensure a more robust understanding of the data, allowing for clearer, evidence-

backed conclusions.

50 | P a g e
Findings/Results of the
Study

51 | P a g e
This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative surveys

and qualitative interviews and focus group discussions to comprehensively assess the

influence of sustainability claims on the purchasing behavior of Generation Z consumers

in the fashion and apparel industry.

Quantitative Findings

1. Demographics of Respondents

o Age Group: The respondents were predominantly within the age range

of 18 to 24 years, which represents the core of Generation Z. Within this

group, 60% were between the ages of 21 and 24, while 40% were in the

18 to 20 age range.

o Gender: A balanced gender distribution was observed, with 52% female

respondents, 45% male respondents, and 3% identifying as non-binary.

o Geographic Distribution: A majority of the participants (70%) were

from urban areas, particularly from large metropolitan cities known for

higher exposure to fashion trends and sustainable practices.

Approximately 30% were from suburban and rural regions, providing a

more diverse representation.

o Education and Income Levels: Most participants were students (65%),

with 20% employed part-time jobs, and 15% full-time employees. Their

income levels were diverse, with 40% falling into lower-income

categories (less than $30,000 annually), 35% in middle-income brackets

($30,000–$60,000), and 25% in higher-income groups (more than

$60,000 annually).

52 | P a g e
2. Awareness of Sustainability Claims

o A significant 75% of respondents reported being aware of sustainability

claims made by fashion brands. However, the depth of understanding

regarding these claims varied considerably, with only 35% expressing

confidence in their ability to distinguish between authentic sustainability

claims and marketing tactics (e.g., "greenwashing").

o Respondents were generally familiar with terms such as “eco-friendly

materials,” “ethical sourcing,” and “fair trade practices,” though only

30% stated that they consistently researched these claims before

purchasing.

3. Impact of Sustainability Claims on Purchase Decisions

o When asked if sustainability claims influenced their purchasing

decisions, 63% of respondents answered affirmatively. This suggests that

a significant proportion of Generation Z is motivated by environmental

concerns when making fashion-related purchases.

o Of those who were influenced by sustainability claims, 55% stated that

they considered sustainability claims a critical factor in their decision-

making process, particularly when choosing between two similar

products.

o However, the influence of sustainability claims was moderated by factors

such as brand reputation and price. For instance, 60% of participants

mentioned that while sustainability was important, they would only

prioritize it if the price difference between sustainable and non-

sustainable options was small (less than 10%).

53 | P a g e
4. Price Sensitivity

o Price sensitivity emerged as a significant moderating variable in the

decision-making process. 70% of participants stated that if a sustainable

product was priced higher than a non-sustainable alternative by more

than 15%, they would choose the latter, even if they felt strongly about

sustainability.

o However, 56% of respondents indicated they would be willing to pay a

premium (ranging from 5% to 15% higher) for products they perceived

as truly sustainable. The willingness to pay more was notably higher

among females and respondents with higher income levels.

5. Trust in Sustainability Claims

o Trust in sustainability claims varied significantly. 50% of respondents

expressed skepticism about brands' claims, associating sustainability

with “greenwashing.” A recurring theme in the responses was a demand

for greater transparency from brands in how sustainability claims were

substantiated.

o On the other hand, 45% of respondents believed that fashion brands were

genuinely working towards sustainability, but only 25% were confident

in the effectiveness of these efforts.

6. Brand and Social Influence

o Brand loyalty and social media influence were found to have a significant

role in shaping purchasing decisions. 58% of respondents stated that they

were more likely to trust sustainability claims if they had previously

54 | P a g e
 engaged with the brand on social media platforms like Instagram or

TikTok.

o Social media influencers were also highlighted as key drivers of

sustainable fashion trends. 65% of respondents mentioned that influencer

endorsements or social media campaigns around sustainability positively

influenced their attitudes toward fashion brands and sustainability.

Qualitative Findings

1. Perceptions of Sustainability Claims

o In-depth interviews and focus group discussions revealed that Gen Z

consumers are generally supportive of sustainable fashion but remain

skeptical of brands that use sustainability as a marketing tool without

real, impactful efforts. Participants described a desire for transparency,

authenticity, and concrete actions over abstract claims.

o One recurring theme was the "greenwashing" perception. Participants

expressed frustration with brands that used vague terms like “eco-

friendly” without providing specific details about their sourcing

practices, labor conditions, or the actual environmental impact of their

products.

o Many respondents emphasized the importance of third-party

certifications such as Fair Trade, Global Organic Textile Standard

(GOTS), and OEKO-TEX certification. They viewed these certifications

as proof of a brand’s commitment to sustainable practices.

55 | P a g e
 2. Influence of Social Media

o Social media was frequently mentioned as a key factor in shaping

perceptions of sustainability in the fashion industry. Participants revealed

that influencer endorsements, especially those from activists or eco-

conscious celebrities, were an important source of information regarding

sustainable brands.

o However, participants also noted a tension between influencers

promoting sustainable products while also endorsing fast fashion brands,

which diluted the authenticity of the sustainability message. The concept

of “performative sustainability” was frequently discussed, highlighting a

gap between what influencers promote and their actual purchasing habits.

3. Emotional Drivers

o Gen Z consumers viewed sustainable fashion as a way to align their

personal values with their purchasing decisions. Participants frequently

cited “doing good for the planet” and “supporting ethical labor practices”

as key emotional drivers in their purchase behavior.

o Many respondents also expressed frustration with the lack of affordable

sustainable options, which made it difficult to fully embrace sustainable

fashion without compromising other lifestyle choices.

ii. Limitations

While the study provides insightful findings, several limitations should be

acknowledged:

1. Sample Bias

56 | P a g e
 o The study relied heavily on an urban, online demographic, predominantly

composed of individuals with access to the internet and social media.

This bias excludes individuals from rural areas or lower-income groups

who may not have the same exposure to or understanding of

sustainability in fashion.

o Additionally, the sample size, although robust, was predominantly

composed of university students or early-career professionals. This group

may not fully represent the broader Gen Z consumer base, especially

those in different stages of life or with different socio-economic

backgrounds.

2. Geographic Limitations

o The research primarily focused on respondents from North America and

Europe. These regions tend to have higher awareness of sustainable

fashion compared to other regions, which may skew the results. Future

research should include more diverse geographic areas to provide a

global perspective.

3. Self-Reported Data

o The reliance on self-reported data through surveys and interviews

introduces a risk of social desirability bias, where respondents might

overstate their sustainable behaviors and attitudes to align with what they

perceive as socially acceptable.

4. Cross-Sectional Design

57 | P a g e
 o The cross-sectional nature of the study limits the ability to examine long-

term behavior changes or trends. It provides a snapshot of consumer

attitudes at a specific point in time, but it does not capture how these

attitudes may evolve or change as sustainable practices in the fashion

industry continue to develop.

5. Focus on Fashion and Apparel

o While the study focused solely on the fashion and apparel industry, other

sectors (e.g., food, electronics) may experience different consumer

responses to sustainability claims. The findings from this study cannot be

generalized to all industries.

iii. Scope for Further Study

Future research could address the limitations of this study while exploring new

dimensions of sustainability in fashion and its influence on consumer behavior:

1. Longitudinal Studies

o Longitudinal studies that track changes in consumer attitudes and

behaviors over time could offer valuable insights into how Generation

Z’s commitment to sustainable fashion evolves. Such studies could

investigate whether shifts in purchasing habits align with changes in the

industry or in societal attitudes toward sustainability.

2. Global and Diverse Samples

o Future research should include diverse geographical and cultural

perspectives. Including participants from a range of countries and income

58 | P a g e
 groups will provide a broader understanding of how sustainability claims

are perceived and acted upon by Generation Z globally.

3. Behavioral Data Integration

o In addition to self-reported data, future studies could integrate behavioral

data, such as actual purchase history, to assess whether stated intentions

align with real-world behaviors. This would offer a more accurate picture

of consumer decision-making.

4. Comparative Industry Analysis

o Expanding the scope to include comparisons across different industries

would help identify whether the influence of sustainability claims on

purchase decisions is stronger in fashion compared to other sectors such

as food, electronics, and beauty.

5. Examination of Greenwashing and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

o Future studies could delve deeper into the issue of greenwashing,

exploring how it impacts consumer trust and brand loyalty. Additionally,

examining the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives

and their effectiveness in building consumer trust could provide further

insights into how brands can authentically engage with their consumers.

6. Impact of Policy and Regulations

o Future research could also examine the role of policy, regulations, and

certifications in shaping consumer perceptions. For example,

understanding the impact of environmental regulations on fashion brands'

59 | P a g e
 Recommendations

Based on the findings from this study on the impact of sustainability claims on the

purchase decisions of Generation Z consumers in the fashion and apparel industry,

several recommendations can be made for brands, marketers, and policymakers in the

industry. These recommendations aim to enhance the understanding of how

sustainability can be leveraged to influence Gen Z purchasing behavior, foster brand

loyalty, and encourage more sustainable consumption patterns.

Recommendations for Fashion Brands:

1. Enhance Transparency and Authenticity:

o Provide Clear and Verifiable Information: Brands should ensure their

sustainability claims are clear, transparent, and backed by verifiable

evidence. This includes disclosing information about sourcing,

production processes, environmental impact, and certifications (e.g., Fair

Trade, GOTS, etc.).

o Use Third-Party Certifications: To overcome skepticism around

greenwashing, it is essential to leverage reputable third-party

certifications. These help ensure that claims are credible and provide

consumers with the assurance they need when choosing sustainable

products.

o Showcase Sustainability Efforts in Detail: Go beyond simple claims

such as "eco-friendly" or "sustainable." Provide consumers with concrete

details on how sustainability is integrated into the product lifecycle—

60 | P a g e
 whether through ethical labor practices, eco-friendly materials, or

reduced carbon footprints.

2. Engage in Direct Communication with Consumers:

o Education and Awareness Campaigns: Fashion brands should launch

educational campaigns that explain the importance of sustainability in

fashion, how the brand is addressing sustainability challenges, and how

consumers can make a difference through their purchases. This can

include storytelling about how products are made, where materials are

sourced from, and the positive impact of the brand’s sustainable efforts.

o Transparency in Pricing: To address the issue of price sensitivity,

brands should be open about the price premium of sustainable products

and why this premium exists. Educating consumers about the true costs

of sustainability, including fair wages, eco-friendly production methods,

and resource conservation, can help reduce resistance to higher prices.

3. Leverage Social Media Influencers and Partnerships:

o Collaborations with Sustainability Advocates: Brands should consider

partnering with influencers who genuinely advocate for sustainability.

Influencers who are known for their authentic environmental or social

causes can help build trust in the brand’s claims.

o Social Media Campaigns with a Purpose: Social media platforms such

as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube play a central role in shaping

Generation Z’s purchasing behavior. By running campaigns that

emphasize sustainability and align with the values of this demographic,

brands can create deeper connections and foster greater brand loyalty.
61 | P a g e
 o Promote Sustainable Fashion through Trends: Gen Z is heavily

influenced by fashion trends. Brands should create and promote

sustainable fashion trends through social media channels, leveraging

user-generated content to amplify their reach.

4. Price Strategy and Product Accessibility:

o Offer Affordable Sustainable Options: To overcome the barrier of

price sensitivity, brands could consider developing entry-level

sustainable fashion lines. By making eco-friendly products more

affordable, even for lower-income groups, they can expand their

consumer base.

o Introduce Subscription Models or Circular Fashion: Another strategy

to make sustainable fashion more accessible is introducing clothing rental

services, subscription models, or promoting the idea of circular fashion.

This allows consumers to enjoy sustainable fashion without the burden

of high upfront costs.

5. Continuous Innovation and Commitment to Sustainability:

o Invest in Sustainable Innovation: Fashion brands should continue

investing in research and development to find innovative ways to make

their products more sustainable. This could include the use of

biodegradable materials, upcycled fabrics, or adopting new production

technologies that reduce environmental impact.

o Sustainability as a Core Brand Value: Sustainability should be

integrated into the very core of the brand’s mission and values, rather

than as a secondary marketing tactic. By making sustainability a priority

62 | P a g e
 in every aspect of their business model—from design to production and

retail—brands can attract more conscientious consumers.

Recommendations for Marketers:

1. Segmentation and Targeting:

o Marketers should segment their audience within Generation Z based on

their level of interest and knowledge about sustainability. While some

may prioritize environmental concerns over price, others may focus more

on affordability. Tailoring marketing strategies to these different

segments will help ensure more targeted and effective communications.

o Use of Emotional and Rational Appeals: Campaigns should appeal to

both the emotional drivers (e.g., feeling good about supporting ethical

brands) and the rational drivers (e.g., detailed information about how the

products are made). A blend of both emotional and rational messages will

resonate better with the diverse Gen Z audience.

2. Promote Sustainable Consumption Beyond Fashion:

o While focusing on fashion sustainability, marketers should also promote

sustainable consumption behaviors beyond just the clothing purchase.

For example, they can educate Gen Z consumers on how to maintain

clothing longer, how to recycle or upcycle garments, and how to be

conscious of their overall environmental footprint.

Recommendations for Policymakers:

1. Support for Sustainable Fashion Policies:

63 | P a g e
 o Governments and policymakers should provide support for the fashion

industry’s transition toward more sustainable practices. This could

include offering tax incentives to companies that adopt sustainable

production methods or use eco-friendly materials.

o Implementing stricter regulations against greenwashing and holding

companies accountable for misleading sustainability claims is vital for

ensuring consumer protection and trust.

2. Public Awareness Campaigns:

o Policymakers can collaborate with the fashion industry and educational

institutions to run public awareness campaigns that focus on sustainable

fashion choices. Educating the general public, especially younger

consumers, about the environmental and social impacts of the fashion

industry can drive more responsible consumer behavior.

Bibliography

• Books and Journals:

o Black, S. (2012). The Sustainable Fashion Handbook. Thames &

Hudson.

o Fletcher, K. (2008). Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys.

Earthscan.

o Niinimäki, K., & Hassi, L. (2011). "Emerging Design Strategies in

Sustainable Production and Consumption of Textiles and Clothing."

Sustainable Development, 19(5), 358-369.

o Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating Sustainable Consumption. Earthscan.

64 | P a g e
• Online Sources:

o Global Fashion Agenda. (2020). The Pulse of the Fashion Industry.

Retrieved from www.globalfashionagenda.com

o Fashion Revolution. (2020). Fashion Transparency Index 2020.

Retrieved from www.fashionrevolution.org

o GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2021). Sustainability Reporting

Standards. Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org

• Reports and Publications:

o McKinsey & Company. (2020). The State of Fashion 2020. Retrieved

from www.mckinsey.com

o Nielsen. (2018). The Rise of Sustainable Consumerism. Retrieved from

www.nielsen.com

65 | P a g e
Sustainability and Fashion: Consumer Survey (Gen Z)

Section 1: Demographic Information

1. Age:

o 18-22

o 23-25

o 26-30

2. Gender:

o Male

o Female

o Non-binary

o Prefer not to say

3. Location (Country/Region):

o [Text box]

4. Level of Education:

o High School

o Undergraduate

o Postgraduate

o Other (Please specify): ___________

66 | P a g e
 5. Annual Income:

o Less than $10,000

o $10,000 - $20,000

o $20,000 - $30,000

o $30,000+

Section 2: Sustainability Awareness

6. How often do you hear about sustainability in the fashion industry?

o Very often

o Occasionally

o Rarely

o Never

7. Are you aware of sustainability claims made by fashion brands?

o Yes

o No

8. Where do you usually get your information about sustainability claims?

(Select all that apply)

o Brand Websites

o Social Media

o Blogs or News Articles

67 | P a g e
 o Friends/Family

o Retail Stores

o Other (Please specify): ______________

9. Which of the following do you associate with sustainability claims in

fashion? (Select all that apply)

o Eco-friendly materials

o Fair trade or ethical labor practices

o Reduced carbon footprint

o Recycling/Upcycling

o Renewable energy in production

o Other (Please specify): ______________

10. How important is it for you that a fashion brand provides proof of its

sustainability claims (e.g., certifications, transparency reports)?

o Very important

o Somewhat important

o Not important

o I don’t care

68 | P a g e
Section 3: Purchase Behavior and Intentions

11. Have you ever made a fashion purchase specifically because the brand

claimed to be sustainable?

o Yes

o No

12. How often do you consider sustainability when making a purchase decision

in the fashion industry?

o Always

o Often

o Sometimes

o Never

13. Would you be willing to pay more for a product if you knew it was

sustainably produced?

o Yes

o No

o Maybe

14. If yes, how much more would you be willing to pay for sustainable fashion?

o 0%

o 5%

69 | P a g e
 o 10%

o 20%

o 30% or more

15. In your opinion, what is the main barrier preventing you from purchasing

more sustainable fashion?

o Price

o Limited availability of sustainable options

o Lack of trust in sustainability claims

o Fashion trends and styles

o Not enough information about sustainability

o Other (Please specify): ______________

16. Do you feel that sustainable fashion products are of good quality compared

to regular fashion products?

o Yes, they are of better quality

o No, they are of the same quality

o No, they are of lower quality

o Not sure

17. How much of an impact do you believe your purchase decisions have on the

environment?

o A significant impact

70 | P a g e
 o A moderate impact

o A minimal impact

o No impact

Section 4: Influence of Social Media and Brand Perception

18. Do social media influencers affect your decision to purchase sustainable

fashion?

o Yes, they influence me a lot

o Yes, to some extent

o No, not at all

o I don’t follow influencers

19. Which of the following social media platforms influence your fashion

purchasing decisions the most?

o Instagram

o TikTok

o YouTube

o Facebook

o Pinterest

o Other (Please specify): ______________

71 | P a g e
 20. How likely are you to trust a fashion brand that you follow on social media

regarding their sustainability claims?

o Very likely

o Somewhat likely

o Not likely

o I do not trust social media brands

Section 5: Perceptions of Sustainability Claims

21. Do you believe most fashion brands’ sustainability claims are genuine?

o Yes

o No

o I’m not sure

22. What factors influence your perception of a brand’s sustainability? (Select

all that apply)

o Certifications (e.g., Fair Trade, GOTS)

o Brand history and reputation

o Transparency in production process

o Materials used in the products

o Price of the product

o Other (Please specify): ______________

72 | P a g e
 23. What do you think is more important when it comes to sustainable fashion?

o The brand's ethical practices

o The eco-friendliness of materials

o The carbon footprint of the brand

o Price and affordability

o A combination of all of the above

24. What would make you trust a fashion brand’s sustainability claim the most?

(Open-ended question)

25. Do you think that sustainable fashion is a trend or a lasting change?

o A trend

o A lasting change

o I’m not sure

Section 6: Open-ended Questions

26. What sustainability-related actions do you believe fashion brands should

take to make their products more appealing to you? (Open-ended question)

27. What do you think is the role of fashion brands in addressing environmental

issues? (Open-ended question)

28. What changes would you like to see in the fashion industry to make it more

sustainable in the future? (Open-ended question)

73 | P a g e
 29. Do you think sustainability claims should be regulated by authorities to

ensure authenticity?

o Yes

o No

o I’m not sure

30. What other factors, besides sustainability, influence your purchase decisions

when it comes to fashion products? (Open-ended question)

ii. Keywords and their Meanings

1. Sustainability – The ability to meet present needs without compromising the

ability of future generations to meet their own needs, particularly concerning the

environment, society, and the economy.

2. Greenwashing – A deceptive marketing practice where a company exaggerates

or falsely claims environmental friendliness to attract consumers.

3. Eco-friendly – Products that are not harmful to the environment, often made

using renewable resources or processes that reduce environmental impact.

4. Circular Economy – An economic system aimed at eliminating waste and the

continual use of resources by recycling, reusing, and repurposing materials.

5. Sustainable Fashion – Fashion that is designed, produced, and consumed in

ways that are environmentally friendly, socially responsible, and economically

viable.

74 | P a g e