0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views10 pages

Lec 22

The document discusses the concepts of limits and continuity in metric spaces, providing definitions, theorems, and proofs related to these topics. It establishes the conditions under which limits exist and how they relate to continuity, including the uniqueness of limits and the implications of continuity on compactness. Additionally, it includes homework assignments for further reading on the subject.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views10 pages

Lec 22

The document discusses the concepts of limits and continuity in metric spaces, providing definitions, theorems, and proofs related to these topics. It establishes the conditions under which limits exist and how they relate to continuity, including the uniqueness of limits and the implications of continuity on compactness. Additionally, it includes homework assignments for further reading on the subject.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Math 313: Lecture 22

M. K. Vemuri
Limits

Definition
Let (X , dX ) and (Y , dY ) be metric spaces, E ⊆ X , f : E → Y ,
and p a limit point of E . Let q ∈ Y . We write

lim f (x) = q,
x→p

if for all ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that for all x ∈ E ,

0 < dX (x, p) < δ =⇒ dY (f (x), q) < ε.

Note that p need not be a point of E . Moreover, even if p ∈ E , it


may not be the case that limx→p f (x) = f (p).
Limits (contd)

Theorem
Let X , Y , E , f , p and q be as in the above definition. Then

lim f (x) = q
x→p

iff
lim f (pn ) = q
n→∞

for every sequence {pn } in E such that pn ̸= p for all n and


limn→∞ pn = p.
Proof. Assume limx→p f (x) = q, and {pn } is a sequence in E
such that pn ̸= p for all n and limn→∞ pn = p. Let ε > 0 be given.
Then there exists δ > 0 such that dY (f (x), q) < ε if x ∈ E and
0 < dX (x, p) < δ, and there exists N such that n ≥ N implies
0 < d(pn , p) < δ. Thus n ≥ N implies dY (f (pn ), q) < ε. It follows
that limn→∞ f (pn ) = q.
Limits (contd)
yeh book me better diya hai

Conversely, assume that it is not the case that limx→p f (x) = q.


Then there exists ε > 0 such that for every N ∈ N, there is a point
pn ∈ E , with 0 < dX (pn , p) < 1/n and d(f (pn ), q) ≥ ε. Then
pn ̸= p for all n, and pn → p, but {f (pn )} does not converge to
q.
Corollary
If f has a limit at p, this limit is unique.
This follows from the previous theorem and the fact that limits of
sequences are unique.
Continuous functions

Definition
Suppose (X , dX ) and (Y , dY ) are metric spaces, E ⊆ X , p ∈ E ,
and f : E → Y . Then f is said to be continuous at p if for all
ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that for all x ∈ E

dX (x, p) < δ =⇒ dY (f (x), f (p)) < ε.

If f is continuous at every point of E , then f is said to be


continuous on E .
Note that f has to be defined at p in order to be continuous at p.
If p is an isolated point of E , then the condition of continuity at p
is vacuous, and every function defined on E is continuous at p.
Continuous functions (contd)
Theorem
In the situation of the previous definition, assume also that p is a
limit point of E . Then f is continous at p iff limx→p f (x) = f (p)
The proof is a matter of carefully comparing the definitions of limit
and continuous function, and is left to the reader.
Theorem
Suppose X , Y , Z are metric spaces, E ⊆ X , p ∈ E , f : E → Y ,
g : f (E ) → Z and h = g ◦ f . If f is continuous at p and g is
continuous at f (p) then h is continous at p.
Proof. Let ε > 0 be given. Since g is continuous at f (p), there
exists η > 0 such that for all y ∈ f (E )
dY (y , f (p)) < η =⇒ dZ (g (y ), g (f (p))) < ε.

Since f is continuous at p, there exists δ > 0 such that for all


x ∈E
dX (x, p) < δ =⇒ dY (f (x), f (p)) < η.
Continuous functions (contd)
Therefore for all x ∈ E

dX (x, p) < δ =⇒ dZ (g (f (x)), g (f (p))) < ε.

It follows that h is continous at p.


Theorem
Let (X , dX ) and (Y , dY ) be metric spaces and f : X → Y . The
function f is continuous (on X ) iff f −1 (V ) is open in X for every
open set V in Y .
Proof. Assume f is continuous (on X ) and V is open in Y . Let
p ∈ f −1 (V ). Since V is open there exists ε > 0 such that
Nε (f (p)) ⊆ V . Since f is continuous at p, there exists δ > 0 such
that f (Nδ (p)) ⊆ Nε (f (p)), whence f (Nδ (p)) ⊆ V , whence
Nδ (p) ⊆ f −1 (V ). Therefore p is an interior point of f −1 (V ). It
follows that f −1 (V ) is open.
Continuous functions (contd)

Conversely, assume that f −1 (V ) is open in X for every open set V


in Y . Fix p ∈ X and let ε > 0 be given. Since Nε (f (p)) is open in
Y , it follows that U = f −1 (Nε (f (p))) is open in X . Since p ∈ U,
it is an interior point of U, and so there exists δ > 0 such that
Nδ (p) ⊆ U. Therefore f (Nδ (p)) ⊆ Nε (f (p)), i.e.

dX (x, p) < δ =⇒ dY (f (x), f (p)) < ε.

It follows that f is continous at p. Since p is arbitrary, it follows


that f is continuous (on X ).
Corollary
A mapping f of a metric space X into a metric space Y is
continuous iff f −1 (C ) is closed in X for every closed set C in Y .
https://chatgpt.com/c/67f9690e-fa38-8012-8555-2ce2b1c821f9
Continuity and Compactness

Theorem
Suppose f is a continuous mapping of a compact metric space X
into a metric space Y . Then f (X ) is compact.

Proof.
Let {Vα } be an open cover of f (X ). Since f is continuous,
{f −1 (Vα )} is an open cover of X . Since X is compact, there exist
α1 , . . . , αn such that

X ⊆ f −1 (Vα1 ) ∪ · · · ∪ f −1 (Vαn ).

Since f (f −1 (E )) ⊆ E for every E ⊆ Y , it follows that

f (X ) ⊆ Vα1 ∪ · · · ∪ Vαn .
Some homework

Read articles 4.3 – 4.4 (p85), 4.9 – 4.13 (p87-89)

You might also like