Jayat Et Al., 2021
Jayat Et Al., 2021
DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12510
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
1
 Unidad Ejecutora Lillo, CONICET-
Fundación M. Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina
                                                       Abstract
2
 CONICET, División Mastozoología,                      Phyllotis Waterhouse 1837 is one of the most studied genera of South American cri-
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales                  cetid rodents. As currently understood, it includes 20 small to medium-sized species
"Bernardino Rivadavia", Ciudad Autónoma
                                                       of predominantly rocky habitats. Among them, populations of the yellow-rumped
de Buenos Aires, Argentina
3                                                      leaf-eared mouse, traditionally referred to P. xanthopygus (Waterhouse 1837), are
 Grupo de Investigaciones de la
Biodiversidad-IADIZA-CCTMendoza-                    the most widely distributed, extending from central Peru to southern Chile and
CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina                            Argentina. Based mostly on molecular evidence, previous studies suggested that
4
 Department of Biological Science, Florida             P. xanthopygus constitutes a species complex, being characterized by geographically
State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
5
                                                       structured and genetically divergent clades. In this work, we compare the molecu-
 Instituto Superior de Correlación
Geológica, CONICET –Universidad                       lar phylogenetic hypothesis for populations distributed on the eastern slopes of the
Nacional de Tucumán, San Miguel de                     central Andes with morphometric evidence using univariate and multivariate analy-
Tucumán, Argentina
6
                                                       ses. Quantitative morphological and molecular evidence suggests that at least four
 Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical
(IBN), CCT-CONICET, Tucumán,
                                                       nearly cryptic species of the P. xanthopygus complex occur from southern Bolivia
Argentina                                              to west-central Argentina. Three of these taxa have available names; one of them,
7
 Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, IBS                P. caprinus, is currently recognized to the species level; the other two, the clades of
(CONICET-UNaM), Posadas, Argentina
                                                       P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris and P. vaccarum, are both recognized as subspecies
Correspondence                                         of P. xanthopygus. The remaining taxon represents a new species distributed in the
J. Pablo Jayat, Unidad Ejecutora Lillo                 west-central Andes of Argentina. We discuss our morphological results in the light
(CONICET-Fundación Miguel Lillo).
                                                       of other sources of evidence (e.g. qualitative and quantitative state characters, genetic
Miguel Lillo 251. CP 4000. San Miguel de
Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.                           and phylogenetic studies, and cytogenetic data) and name the new species as P. pe-
Email: eljayat@gmail.com                               huenche, honouring the original native people that historically inhabited west-central
Funding information
                                                       Andes of Argentina.
National Council for Science
and Technology of Argentina,                           KEYWORDS
CONICET, Grant/Award Number: PIP                       cryptic species, integrative taxonomy, Myomorpha, new species, Phyllotini, sigmodontinae
11220150100258CO; Agencia Nacional de
Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Grant/
Award Number: PICT 1636 and PICT
2012-0050; National Science Foundation,
Grant/Award Number: DEB-0108422,
DEB-0841447 and DEB-1754748
from the Altiplano of northern Argentina, northern Chile,         2.2    |   Phylogenetic framework of the study
Bolivia and southern Peru, named the P. posticalis-P. rup-
estris clade. Using a unilocus species delimitation method,       We structured all qualitative and quantitative morphologic
the Bayesian implementation of the Poisson tree processes         analyses on the basis of the phylogenetic hypothesis devel-
(bPTP), these authors corroborate most of these clades as         oped by Ojeda et al. (2021). Additionally, we added 47 new
species-level lineages, but four species were delimited within   samples not included in Ojeda et al. (2021) that greatly ex-
the clade of P. posticalis –P. rupestris. The mean genetic       panded the geographic coverage for DNA data and analysed
distances between clades ranged from 3.0% between P. vac-         them in a more restricted and detailed genealogic analysis,
carum and P. limatus, to 10.6% between P. sp. 1 and P. sp. 2      testing the monophyly of the new species (see Supplementary
and between P. posticalis-P. rupestris and P. sp. 2.             Material S1).
    In this work, we use morphology to test the status of those
clades distributed on the eastern Andean slopes of the west-
central Andes of Argentina, which include, from north to          2.3    |   Taxonomic assignment of the samples
south, P. x. posticalis -P. x. rupestris, P. caprinus, P. vac-
carum and P. sp. 2. We focus our analysis on populations          We examined skull and dental morphology of the Argentinean
of the central Andes in western Argentina because is a geo-       specimens of Phyllotis used in the phylogenetic analysis de-
graphic area highly underrepresented in previous studies and      veloped by Ojeda et al. (2021) in search of qualitative state
for which we have gathered a great quantity of information        characters associated to each one of the recognized mitochon-
in recent years. We characterize at least four clades that we     drial clades. Then, we looked for these same characters in the
hypothesize correspond to distinct species. Three of these        specimens examined in systematic collections not included in
clades could be associated with previously available names        the phylogenetic analysis of Ojeda et al. (2021). We follow
but we recognize one as representing a new species. We            original morphological descriptions of the nominal forms (e.g.
discuss our results in the light of other sources of evidence     Cabrera, 1926; Crespo, 1964; Thomas, 1912, 1919) and revi-
(including genetic, phylogenetic and cytogenetic published        sionary studies of the genus Phyllotis (e.g. Hershkovitz, 1962;
data) and describe the newly recognized species, which was        Pearson, 1958), to relate the characters’ state observed in our
named honouring the original native people that historically      samples with specimens of the several nominal forms de-
inhabited west-central Andes of Argentina and nearby areas       scribed for the genus. When qualitative state characters were
of Chile.                                                         not useful (e.g. damaged or broken skulls and obliterated mo-
                                                                  lars patterns), we followed a criterion of geographic proximity
                                                                  among localities (respect to the provenance localities of the
2     |       M ATE R IA L S A N D ME T HODS                      sequenced specimens used in the phylogenetic analyses con-
                                                                  ducted by Ojeda et al., 2021 and to the collecting localities of
2.1       |    Specimens examined                                 confidently identified specimens). In using this last criterion,
                                                                  we took into account the presence of major geographic barri-
Specimens of Phyllotis used in this study (Figure 1 and           ers between populations, environmental continuity and the ab-
Supplementary Material S1) are housed in the following            sence of obvious discontinuities in size and shape of the skull
Argentinean natural history collections: Centro Regional          (and in the external appearance of the skins) within groups (see
de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica        Teta et al., 2018 and references there for a similar procedure).
de La Rioja (CRILAR), La Rioja; Instituto Argentino
de Investigaciones de Zonas Áridas (CMI), Mendoza;
Fundación-Instituto Miguel Lillo (CML), San Miguel               2.4    |   DNA Sequencing
de Tucumán; Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales
‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ (MACN-     Ma), Ciudad Autónoma           We sequenced the partial or complete cytochrome b gene
de Buenos Aires; Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales            (cytb; 419 to 1,144 bp) for 47 individuals from localities of
‘Lorenzo Scaglia’ (MMPMa), Mar del Plata; Centro Nacional         Mendoza and Neuquén provinces (Supplementary Material
Patagónico (CNP), Puerto Madryn. We examined 654 speci-           S1). These specimens were collected from an overlapping but
mens of this genus, including types and topotypes of several      more extensive range to that of P. sp. 2 in Ojeda et al. (2021).
nominal forms allied to the P. xanthopygus species com-           Amplifications and sequencing followed Steppan et al. (2007)
plex, including P. bonariensis Crespo, 1964 (holotype and         using primers P484 and P485 for PCR with 35–40 cycles
paratypes); P. caprinus Pearson, 1958 (topotypes); P. dar-        of 94°C (30–45 s), 55°C (45 s), and 72°C (90 s) between
wini vaccarum Thomas, 1912 (topotypes); P. ricardulus             an initial denaturation at 94°C (2 min) and a terminal 72°C
Thomas, 1919 (topotypes); and P. oreigenus Cabrera, 1926          elongation (6–7 min). Sequences were aligned and individu-
(topotypes).                                                      ally checked for quality in Sequencher (GeneCodes Corp.)
4
    |                                                                                                                                           JAYAT et al.
F I G U R E 1 Maps showing type localities of the nominal forms related to the P. xanthopygus complex (stars) and the sequenced specimens
included in Ojeda et al. (2021) (left), and the collecting localities of the specimens studied in the morphometric analyses (right). Phyllotis
bonariensis (turquoise circles); P. caprinus (orange circles); clade of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (light blue circles); clade of P. sp. 1 (green
circles); clade of P. sp. 2 (red circles); clade of P. vaccarum (yellow circles); clade of P. xanthopygus s.s. (pink circles)
and Mesquite v3.08 (Maddison & Maddison, 2017) before                            2.6     |   Morphometric analyses
further analysis. Sequences have been deposited on Genbank
with accession numbers MZ298848-MZ298894.                                       Standard external measurements were recorded from speci-
                                                                                 men labels or museum catalogs: total body length (includ-
                                                                                 ing body plus tail length), TBL; tail length, T; hind foot
2.5      |   Phylogenetic analysis                                               length (including claw), HF; ear length, E; and weight, W.
                                                                                 The following 24 skull measurements were recorded with
The 47 new sequences for cytb were combined with 24 pre-                         digital calipers to the nearest of 0.01 mm following defini-
viously published sequences representing P. sp. 2, P. bon-                       tions provided by Hershkovitz (1962), Myers (1989) and
ariensis, P. caprinus, P. darwini, P. limatus, P. vaccarum,                      Myers et al. (1990): total length of the skull, TLS; con-
P. xanthopygus s.s., P. x. chilensis, P. x. posticalis and                       dyloincisive length, CIL; basal length, BL; palatal length,
P. x. rupestris for phylogenetic analysis. Sequences were                        PL; diastema length, DL; palatal bridge, PB; maxillary too-
aligned using Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., 2011), and op-                      throw length, MTRL; bullar length less tube, BLLT; bul-
timization of phylogenetic inferences was performed by                           lar breadth, BuB; incisive foramina length, IFL; alveolar
RAxML (Stamatakis, 2006), under the GTR+Γ substitution                           width 1 (across external side of both M1), AW1; alveolar
model selected by AIC in jModeltest2 (Darriba et al., 2012),                     width 2 (across external side of both M3), AW2; zygo-
using five batches of 100 searches, partitioned by codon posi-                   matic length, ZL; zygomatic plate depth, ZP; zygomatic
tion, and random seed values for initial trees. To infer sup-                    breadth, ZB; braincase breadth, BB; interorbital constric-
port for clades, 1,000 bootstrap replicates were conducted.                      tion, IOC; mid-rostral width, RW2; nasal length, NL; ros-
Patristic distances within and between clades for cytb were                      tral length, RL; orbital length, OL; occipital condyle width,
estimated in Mega X (Kumar et al., 2018).                                        OCW. In addition, we recorded the following mandible
JAYAT et al.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                              |   5
F I G U R E 2 Dorsal view of the skull showing some morphological            F I G U R E 3 Occlusal molar view showing the simplified enamel
character states differentiating specimens of the clade of                   molar pattern (very shallow or absent paraflexus on M2 and no trace
P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (left: MACN-Ma 29596) and P. caprinus     of mesoloph complex on M1 and M2) on the upper molar series of
(right: MACN-Ma 29425) in northwestern Argentina. Notice the                specimens of the clade of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (left: MACN-
smaller and more delicate skulls, the rounded (not sharp-edged)             Ma 29594), in comparison with the more complex pattern generally
interorbital region, the frontoparietal suture mostly ‘U’ shaped and the     observed in specimens of the clade of P. vaccarum (right: MACN-Ma
narrow rostrum in the specimen of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris. Scale   29565). Photographs are not in scale
bar = 10 mm
heavier skulls, more robust molar series, and more complex                   to the west in the higher elevations of Chile (Steppan &
enamel molar patterns, which are characterized by a gen-                     Ramírez, 2015; Storz et al., 2020).
erally very deep paraflexus on M2 and by the presence of
a poorly developed but clearly visible mesoloph complex
on M1 and M2 (Figure 3). This clade is morphologically                       3.1.2     |    The clade of P. sp. 2
cohesive and encompasses several of the nominal forms
described for the region (i.e. oreigenus with type locality                  We recorded specimens of this clade in sympatry (and in
in Laguna Blanca, north-central Catamarca Province; ricar-                  syntopy), in at least one locality, with populations of the
dulus with type locality in Otro Cerro, southern Catamarca                   clade of P. vaccarum in southwestern Mendoza Province
Province; and darwini vaccarum with type locality in Punta                   (Figure 1). The skulls of specimens of both clades are very
de Vacas, northwestern Mendoza Province). We examined                        similar, but the molars in P. sp. 2 are appreciably less robust
type, paratypes or topotypes of all these nominal forms and                  and show a more simplified enamel molar pattern, without
several geographic intermediate populations from west-                       the deep paraflexus on M2 and the mesoloph complex on M1
ern Argentina (in La Rioja, Salta, San Juan, San Luis, and                   and/or M2 observed in specimens of the clade of P. vacca-
Tucumán provinces) and did not find constant qualitative                     rum (Figure 6). We also observed some integumental char-
morphologic differences in the skull and enamel molars pat-                  acters (see the discussion section) that differentiate both taxa
terns to distinguish among them (Figures 4 and 5). In south-                 and facilitate the assignment of these specimens in sympatric
western Mendoza and northwestern Neuquén provinces                           areas.
(Figure 1), representatives of the clade of P. vaccarum are                     DNA samples from throughout the range of P. sp. 2, as
sympatric with populations corresponding to the clade of P.                  delimited by the morphological characters, and sequenced
sp. 2 (Ojeda et al., 2021), which represent an undescribed                   for cytb to test the species limits, greatly expanded the
species that will be treated in depth in following paragraphs                range for DNA data beyond that in Ojeda et al. (2021). The
and in the discussion section of this study. Cytb sequence                   phylogeny (Figure 7) clearly corroborates the prior results,
data indicate that the clade of P. vaccarum extends further                  with the 47 new sequences from all 10 localities assigned
JAYAT et al.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                       |    7
F I G U R E 4 Dorsal, ventral and lateral view of the skull, and lateral view of the mandible of topotype specimens of the nominal forms
Phyllotis oreigenus (left and top: MACN-Ma 29565), P. ricardulus (centre: MACN-Ma 29605) and P. darwini vaccarum (right and bottom: CML
4480). Scale bar = 10 mm
to P. sp. 2 by morphology forming a well-differentiated mi-           populations representing each clade for all the metric state
tochondrial clade along with the eight sequences from the              characters analysed (Supplementary Material S2). Tukey's
four localities from Ojeda et al. (2021). Genetic distances            pairwise comparisons indicated one external (W) and sev-
(p) ranged from 0% to 3.5% within the clade of P. sp. 2                eral skull (e.g. TSL, CIL, MTRL, BLLT, BuB, IFL, AW1,
with a mean of 1.5%, and 8.8%–11.5% among members of                  AW2, ZL, ZB, mTRL) measurements that significantly
this clade and the other taxa of the P. xanthopygus complex            differed among most of these main clades (Supplementary
discussed here.                                                        Material S2).
                                                                           Specimens of the clade of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris
                                                                       were the smallest among the studied samples. This holds for
3.2     |      Morphometric analyses                                   all the studied characters with only two exceptions, BLLT
                                                                       and the BuB, which averaged larger in this sample compared
Descriptive morphometrics comparing five of the eight main             with P. caprinus (Table 1). This clade differed in 14 or more
clades obtained by Ojeda et al. (2021) are summarized in               characters when compared with populations of the other
Table 1. The ANOVA showed a good separation among                      clades (Supplementary Material S2).
8
    |                                                                                                                          JAYAT et al.
F I G U R E 7 Maximum likelihood
phylogeny of cytb sequences including all
new and published samples for P. sp. 2 and
a representative sampling for other taxa in
the Phyllotis xanthopygus species complex.
Individuals are identified by Genbank
accession number or for newly sequenced
individuals, by the collector's number (see
Supplementary Material S1). Localities are
indicated in (parentheses), corresponding
to those listed in the Specimens Examined
(Supplementary Material S1). Numbers
above nodes are bootstrap percentages
for values >50%. Scale bar is expected
substitution rate
                                                                                                                                                                                                            10
                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
TABLE 1           External and craniodental measurements for specimens (age classes 2 and 3) of five of the eight main clades obtained by Ojeda et al. (2021) for the Phyllotis xanthopygus complex
             n   X̅ ± SD             r                 n      X̅ ± SD        r              n    X̅ ± SD           r              n        X̅ ± SD        r              n    X̅ ± SD        r
 TBL         5   255 ± 9.37          240–262          8      225 ± 16.40    202–245       57   224 ± 18.07       129–253       92       235 ± 22.48    120–274       14   240 ± 15.14    216–280
 T           5   124 ± 9.97          110–135          8      118 ± 16.22    82–133        57   114 ± 8.33        95–129        92       120 ± 13.50    80–152        14   115 ± 7.43     102–135
 HF          5   27 ± 1.14           25–28            11     27 ± 2.31      21–29         56   25 ± 1.62         19–29         94       28 ± 1.68      23–32         15   30 ± 2.50      25–33
 E           5   24 ± 0.71           23–25            11     22 ± 1.42      19–24         56   25 ± 1.87         20–30         94       25 ± 1.61      21–30         15   25 ± 1.45      22–27
 W           5   72 ± 12.58          62–87            9      38 ± 10.78     22–59         49   41 ± 7.64         25–55         83       47 ± 11.02     27–79         14   55 ± 14.29     36–80
 TLS         6   33.04 ± 1.38        31.74–35.24      11     30.47 ± 1.91   28.00–34.68   65   28.93 ± 1.97      26.51–30.99   99       30.02 ± 1.20   27.26–32.70   15   31.43 ± 0.94   30.29–33.56
 CIL         6   30.95 ± 1.55        29.35–33.61      13     27.70 ± 2.01   24.06–31.92   66   26.54 ± 1.03      23.83–28.73   101      27.78 ± 1.30   24.82–30.70   15   28.88 ± 0.93   27.77–30.97
 BL          6   28.52 ± 1.49        26.98–31.20      13     25.23 ± 2.03   21.61–29.56   64   24.43 ± 1.03      21.62–26.43   101      25.50 ± 1.28   22.82–28.89   15   26.62 ± 0.81   25.39–28.31
 PL          6   17.47 ± 0.64        16.87–18.44      14     15.27 ± 0.95   13.23–17.24   68   14.75 ± 0.58      13.44–15,93   101      15.64 ± 0.74   13.97–17.38   16   16.30 ± 0.53   15.58–17.35
 DL          6   8.86 ± 0.49         8.33–9.71        15     7.62 ± 0.65    6.18–8.84     69   7.42 ± 0.39       6.37–8.20     102      7.69 ± 0.45    6.65–8.83     16   8.08 ± 0.47    7.57–8.99
 PB          6   6.44 ± 0.29         6.12–6.82        14     5.42 ± 0.29    4.97–5.92     68   5.22 ± 0.29       4.35–6.26     101      5.62 ± 0.36    4.63–6.61     16   5.76 ± 0.28    5.14–6.29
 MTRL        6   5.97 ± 0.25         5.57–6.20        15     5.27 ± 0.26    4.85–5.76     70   5.00 ± 0.16       4.59–5.30     103      5.42 ± 0.28    4.81–6.16     16   5.85 ± 0.19    5.59–6.20
 BLLT        6   5.96 ± 0.34         5.42–6.32        12     5.15 ± 0.34    4.60–5.73     68   5.41 ± 0.26       4.58–6.00     101      5.59 ± 0.35    4.91–6.32     15   6.10 ± 0.24    5.67–6.51
 BuB         6   5.08 ± 0.22         4.67–5.28        12     4.33 ± 0.34    3.70–4.84     68   4.72 ± 0.16       4.44–5.15     101      4.90 ± 0.24    4.26–5.39     15   5.24 ± 0.19    4.86–5.57
 IFL         6   7.99 ± 0.53         7.20–8.77        15     6.99 ± 0.54    5.80–8.03     69   6.84 ± 0.42       5.34–7.63     102      7.07 ± 0.46    5.92–8.19     16   7.41 ± 0.31    6.99–8.20
 AW1         6   6.25 ± 0.30         5.94–6.62        15     5.73 ± 0.17    5.39–6.07     68   5.73 ± 0.16       5.33–6.10     103      5.81 ± 0.22    5.32–6.37     16   5.95 ± 0.20    5.55–6.32
 AW2         6   5.68 ± 0.19         5.35–5.86        15     5.18 ± 0.25    4.76–5.57     68   5.00 ± 0.18       4.59–5.31     103      5.24 ± 0.25    4.76–5.79     16   5.43 ± 0.23    5.09–5.84
 ZL          6   17.06 ± 0.78        16.03–18.38      15     15.80 ± 0.82   14.45–17.35   68   14.95 ± 0.60      13.26–16.15   103      15.73 ± 0.72   14.18–17.68   16   16.56 ± 0.59   15.67–17.49
 ZP          6   3.75 ± 0.14         3.60–3.97        15     3.34 ± 0.27    2.78–3.74     70   3.26 ± 0.25       2.51–3.72     103      3.41 ± 0.27    2.79–4.13     16   3.59 ± 0.18    3.20–3.87
 ZB          6   17.18 ± 0.76        16.50–18.50      14     15.44 ± 0.78   14.06–16.92   66   14.83 ± 0.54      13.38–16.15   103      15.54 ± 0.61   14.20–16.78   16   15.99 ± 0.48   15.01–16.54
 BB          6   14.38 ± 0.33        13.85–14.74      15     13.52 ± 0.40   12.88–14.26   68   13.31 ± 0.34      12.65–14.23   102      13.70 ± 0.36   12.81–14.46   15   13.94 ± 0.31   13.41–14.46
 IOC         6   4.44 ± 0.19         4.18–4.69        15     4.53 ± 0.29    4.22–5.19     69   4.16 ± 0.15       3.85–4.59     103      4.31 ± 0.19    3.92–4.82     16   4.14 ± 0.18    3.85–4.44
 RW2         6   5.95 ± 0.33         5.58–6.48        15     5.06 ± 0.40    4.18–5.91     68   4.88 ± 0.30       4.25–5.55     103      5.01 ± 0.28    4.43–5.72     16   5.10 ± 0.28    4.67–5.63
 NL          6   14.45 ± 0.61        13.38–15.10      13     12.79 ± 0.72   11.68–14.07   68   12.4 ± 0.60       10.76–13.85   101      12.64 ± 0.75   11.03–14.59   16   13.77 ± 0.56   12.96–14.75
 RL          6   12.96 ± 0.53        12.58–13.88      13     11.64 ± 0.77   10.41–13.44   68   11.10 ± 0.48      10.10–12.45   101      11.56 ± 0.66   10.15–13.09   16   12.30 ± 0.47   11.67–13.33
 OL          6   11.21 ± 0.41        10.70–11.80      15     10.14 ± 0.60   9.23–11.17    69   9.50 ± 0.42       8.27–10.39    103      10.19 ± 0.41   9.02–11.17    16   10.74 ± 0.38   10.26–11.42
 OCW         6   7.40 ± 0.21         7.12–7.66        13     7.09 ± 0.19    6.78–7.46     65   6.75 ± 0.20       6.28–7.25     102      7.08 ± 0.24    6.60–7.78     15   7.07 ± 0.20    6.79–7.39
 ML          6   17.51 ± 0.82        16.33–18.72      15     15.59 ± 0.91   14.23–17.50   68   15.22 ± 0.53      13.90–16.32   103      15.98 ± 0.73   14.23–17.89   16   16.92 ± 0.62   16.15–18.54
 mTRL        6   5.90 ± 0.16         5.74–6.10        15     5.34 ± 0.27    5.00–5.91     69   5.03 ± 0.18       4.63–5.38     103      5.36 ± 0.23    4.78–5.96     16   5.77 ± 0.16    5.44–5.96
Note: Measurement abbreviations are listed in Materials and Methods.
Abbreviations: n, sample size; r, range; SD, standard deviation; X̅, mean.
                                                                                                                                                                                                            JAYAT et al.
JAYAT et al.                                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                                     |   11
    The first 3 principal components of the sPCA accounted                              of the P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris, the P. vaccarum, and
for 76.55% of the variability in the data set, but only the                             the P. sp. 2 clades, mainly by metric characters related to
first (64.21% of the variance explained) was judged statis-                             the bulla (BLLT and BuB), the molar row series (MTRL
tically significant by the Broken-  stick test (Table 2). PC                           and mTRL) and the rostrum (RW2) (Table 2 and Figure 8).
I was a size component, as all the variables had equal sign                             Phyllotis caprinus shows smaller bullae and molar series but
and loaded heavily on this axis (we confirm this by regress-                            a broader rostrum. In summary, the bivariate plot of PC I and
ing PC I scores against several total length measures). This                            PC II shows a good separation among samples of all studied
PC mainly separated samples of the small-sized P. x. pos-                              clades with the only exception of P. vaccarum, which is more
ticalis-P. x. rupestris on the negative side, from the larger                          variable and widely overlaps with specimens of the P. x. pos-
P. sp. 2 (and P. bonariensis) located well on the positive                              ticalis-P. x. rupestris and the P. sp. 2 clades (Figure 8).
side. Samples of P. caprinus and specimens representing                                     The sDFA (Table 2) completely separated the sam-
the clade of P. vaccarum occupied an intermediate position,                             ples of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris, P. caprinus, P. sp. 2
widely overlapping on this PC with other samples (excepting                             and P. bonariensis. Specimens of the clade of P. vaccarum
P. bonariensis) (Figure 8). PC II mostly separated specimens                            slightly overlapped with those of P. caprinus and P. x. pos-
of P. caprinus (well on the negative side), from the samples                            ticalis-P. x. rupestris, but heavily overlapped with samples
T A B L E 2 Results of the sPCA and sDFA comparing five of the eight main clades obtained by Ojeda et al. (2021) for the Phyllotis
xanthopygus complex
Eigenvectors Eigenvectors
 Variables          PC 1*                PC 2                     PC 3                    DF 1              DF 2                 DF 3                 DF 4
 TLS                 0.20189             −0.091675                  0.018215                0.006791         −0.00080839           0.0073229           0.00065257
 CIL                 0.22862             −0.11153                   0.021123                0.0076825        −0.0011583            0.007479            −0.0014684
 BL                  0.23718             −0.10804                 −0.017943                 0.0075585       −0.000164              0.0081219          −0.001697
 PL                  0.24086             −0.060011                  0.07054                 0.0091748        −0.00032107           0.0068221           −0.0030643
 DL                  0.25007             −0.26457                 −0.11006                  0.0070834        −0.0001997            0.010655            −0.0033772
 PB                  0.23512               0.14808                  0.44351                 0.011039         −0.00049466           0.0069655           −0.0085175
 MTRL                0.22986               0.38844                  0.23825                 0.012853          0.002658             0.0061106            0.0010651
 BLLT                0.18466               0.42653                −0.45067                  0.0072513         0.0092084            0.0065521            0.0013531
 BuB                 0.17913               0.3782                 −0.24409                  0.0073746         0.011615             0.002334            −0.0037874
 IFL                 0.24283             −0.26767                 −0.25328                  0.0064484         0.0009399            0.0099851           −0.0016779
 AW1                 0.093554            −0.018907                  0.035335                0.0030208         5.39E−01             0.0053949           −0.0023438
 AW2                 0.15597               0.17874                  0.082756                0.0074285        −0.0005764            0.0047833           −0.0017979
 ZL                  0.21383               0.02365                −0.025498                 0.0080517         1.89E−01             0.005583             0.00071986
 ZP                  0.26197             −0.024232                −0.22837                  0.0075098         0.0035559            0.0069328            −0.0030443
 ZB                   0.18422            −0.051331                  0.099502                0.007143         −0.00086808           0.0062946            −0.0034899
 BB                   0.095676             0.044527                 0.080576                0.004472         0.00026256            0.0027563            −0.0018798
 IOC                  0.038667           −0.1387                    0.39915                 0.0032077        −0.0076132          −0.0014234             −0.0045258
 RW2                  0.20408            −0.39312                   0.05642                 0.0047758        −0.0038956            0.01309              −0.0059822
 NL                   0.23231            −0.11651                 −0.21014                  0.0060147         0.0023477            0.013055             0.0029131
 RL                   0.24461            −0.071999                −0.067777                 0.0076722         0.0002206            0.0092537            0.00065939
 OL                   0.22583            −0.032701                  0.14077                 0.010559         −0.00072364           0.0056227            −0.00027935
 OCW                  0.10848              0.024653                 0.21529                 0.0059913        −0.0023479            0.00071538           −0.0033741
 ML                   0.22335              0.0079482                0.0024213               0.0085466         0.0018427            0.0064958            −1.06E−01
 mTRL                 0.1918               0.3035                   0.2163                  0.010947         0.00097811            0.0069765            0.0030469
 Eigenvalue           0.00982538           0.00104763               0.000839976             2.6777            1.1085               0.73487              0.40623
 % variance         64.21                  6.85                     5.49                   54.34            22.50                 14.91                 8.244
Note: Phyllotis bonariensis (N = 6), P. caprinus (N = 8), clade of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (N = 59), clade of P. sp. 2 (N = 15) and clade of P. vaccarum
(N = 97). Loadings of the variables, eigenvalues and proportion of the variance explained for the first 3 principal components (PC) and the first 4 discriminant
functions (DF). Results are based on log10-transformed craniodental variables. See ‘Material and Methods’ for variable abbreviations.
12
     |                                           JAYAT et al.
              F I G U R E 8 Individual specimen
              scores based on log-transformed values of
              24 cranial measurements projected onto
              the first and second principal components
              of the sPCA (top), and the first and second
              discriminant functions (DF) of the sDFA
              (bottom) extracted from analysis of
              specimens (age classes 2 and 3) of Phyllotis
              bonariensis (turquoise dots, N = 6),
              P. caprinus (orange dots, N = 8), clade of
              P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (light blue
              dots, N = 59), clade of P. sp. 2 (red dots,
              N = 15) and clade of P. vaccarum (yellow
              dots, N = 97). Character loadings and the
              variance explained by each of the first
              three principal components and each of
              the four discriminant functions appear in
              Table 2
              F I G U R E 9 Individual specimen
              scores based on log-transformed values
              of 24 cranial measurements (Mosimann
              shape variables) projected onto the first
              and second principal components of the
              sfPCA (top) and the first and second
              discriminant functions (DF) of the sfDFA
              (bottom) extracted from analysis of
              specimens (all age classes) of Phyllotis
              bonariensis (turquoise dots, N = 6),
              P. caprinus (orange dots, N = 16), clade of
              P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (light blue
              dots, N = 155), clade of P. sp. 2 (red dots,
              N = 47) and clade of P. vaccarum (yellow
              dots, N = 283). Character loadings and
              the variance explained by each of the first
              three principal components and each of
              the four discriminant functions appear in
              Table 3
JAYAT et al.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                 |   13
referred to the clade of P. sp. 2 and P. bonariensis (Figure 8).     already documented (e.g. Pearson, 1958; Steppan, 1998; Teta
DF I (54.34% of the variance explained) segregated the sam-          et al., 2018). At least in part, this morphological homogene-
ples mostly by the molar tooth rows (upper and lower), the           ity explains the assignment of most of these populations (i.e.
orbital length (OL) and the palatal bridge (PB). The DF II           nominal forms) to the several subspecies of P. xanthopygus
also separated well P. caprinus (on the negative side) from          s.l. In this work, we also documented those morphometric
the other samples. Metric characters related to the bulla, the       similarities for the populations of the central Andes. Despite
rostrum and the interorbital region were the most influential        strong genetic divergences that indicate a significant period
(Table 2). The percentage of correct classifications following       of isolation and divergence (having been suggested began be-
the jackknifed confusion matrix of this analysis was 80.54%          tween 2.83 and 4.05 MA AP in the Pliocene; Riverón, 2011),
(Supplementary Material S4). Most of the specimens of the            this low morphological variability could be explained by
clades of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (93%), P. sp. 2 (93%),   strong stabilizing selection favouring niche conservatism and
P. vaccarum (72%) and P. bonariensis (83%) were correctly            phenotypic stasis, resulting in cryptic species. Nonetheless,
classified, but P. caprinus obtained intermediate values (63%).      there are some differences in size and shape of the skull that
    The sfPCA showed a large overlap for most of the studied         may be appropriate to establish morphometric limits. In the
samples, but specimens corresponding to P. caprinus (lower           following paragraphs we discuss these morphometric differ-
left quadrant) and the clade of P. sp. 2 (upper left quadrant)       ences and other sources of evidence (qualitative morphology
appeared as well separated each other on the bivariate plot of       of the skull and molars, cytogenetic data and geographic dis-
PC I and PC II (Figure 9). This separation was mostly influ-         tribution patterns), which could be viewed as indicators of
enced by the molar series (MTRL and mTRL) and the bullae             the specific status of these forms in light of the mitochondrial
(BLLT and BuB), which were larger in P. sp. 2, and the in-           phylogeny.
terorbital constriction (IOC) and the mid-rostral width, which
were wider in P. caprinus (Table 3). The first principal com-
ponent (the only judged statistically significant according to       4.2 | The clade of
the Broken Stick test) of this analysis summarized 44.71% of         P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris
the explained variance.
    Similar results to that showed by the sfPCA were ob-             According to the phylogenetic analyses of Ojeda et al. (2021;
tained with the sfDFA analysis, but in this case P. caprinus         see also Albright, 2004 and Steppan et al., 2007), representa-
separated much better from P. sp. 2 (specimens of P. capri-          tives of this clade in northwestern Argentina correspond to
nus occupy mostly the right upper quadrat and those of the           a southern sub-clade widely distributed from west-central
clade of P. sp. 2 the left lower quadrat, of the multivariate        Bolivia to extreme northwestern Argentina. We did not
space) and the rest of the samples, which overlapped heavily         measure specimens of this clade from Bolivia or Peru, pre-
(Figure 9). This analysis also revealed the influence of the         cluding us from resolving the status of Argentinean popu-
metric characters related to the bulla, the molar series and         lations; nevertheless, we are confident that Argentinean
the interorbital region as determinant for the separation of         specimens represent a morphological cohesive sample and
P. caprinus (which showed the smallest bullae and molar              a different species from other clades of the eastern Andean
series, and the broadest interorbital constriction revealed          flanks of western Argentina. Mean pairwise genetic dis-
by previous analyses; Table 3). The percentage of correct            tances between P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris and other
classifications following the jackknifed confusion matrix of         clades of the P. xanthopygus complex range from 9.3% to
the sfPCA was 73.37% (Supplementary Material S4). Most               10.6% (see Table 1 in Ojeda et al., 2021), coinciding with (or
of the specimens of the clades of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rup-       well above of) the values observed among other species of
estris (86%), P. sp. 2 (83%) and P. bonariensis (83%) were           Phyllotis (e.g. Jayat et al., 2016; Ojeda et al., 2021; Rengifo
correctly classified, but the other samples obtained inter-          & Pacheco, 2017). Specimens of this clade from Jujuy
mediate values (65% for the clade of P. vaccarum and 63%             Province show chromosome complements with 2n = 38,
for P. caprinus).                                                    FNa = 70–71, including acrocentric autosomes with different
                                                                     patterns of heterochromatin, which are not present in sam-
                                                                     ples from Catamarca and northern Mendoza here assigned
4     |    D IS C U SSION                                            to the clade of P. vaccarum (with 2n = 38, FNa =72 and a
                                                                     karyotype with all biarmed chromosomes and lower amount
4.1 | Species limits in the P. xanthopygus                           of heterochromatin). Specimens of P. sp. 2 have 2n = 38,
species complex of the central Andes                                 FNa = 71–72 and present more heterochromatin than mem-
                                                                     bers of the clade of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris, including
The morphometric similarity (size and shape of the skull) in         an exclusive acrocentric autosome mostly heterochromatic
populations of the P. xanthopygus species complex has been           (Labaroni et al., 2014). Furthermore, our morphometric
14
     |                                                                                                                                                        JAYAT et al.
T A B L E 3 Results of the sfPCA and sfDFA comparing five of the eight main clades obtained by Ojeda et al. (2021) for the Phyllotis
xanthopygus complex
Eigenvectors Eigenvectors
  Variables         PC 1*              PC 2                   PC 3                  DF 1                 DF 2                     DF 3                 DF 4
  TLS               −0.064486          −0.00081786              0.09055               0.0005501            0.0014951               −0.0025847           −0.0018964
  CIL               −0.14443           −0.014142                0.10604             −0.00033915            0.0030881               −0.0031464           0.00019611
  BL                −0.17718             0.00015537             0.089086            −0.00036487            0.0020992               −0.0038998           0.00061931
  PL                −0.14729             0.054239               0.16222             −0.0023649             0.0024609              −0.000774              0.0021849
  DL                −0.28704           −0.087896                0.079574              0.00080222           0.0023844               −0.0054639            0.0050455
  PB                  0.032972           0.13568                0.45638             −0.003321              0.0029763               0.0035788             0.0072166
  MTRL                0.21893            0.39578                0.10228             −0.0077591           −0.0022133                0.0020275            −0.0023089
  BLLT                0.17843            0.3551               −0.5252               −0.00054067          −0.010588                 0.0036351            −0.0024004
  BuB                 0.19548            0.24465              −0.28461              −0.0014576           −0.0096625                0.010565             −0.0011718
  IFL               −0.2404              0.022381               0.0039828           −0.00073701            0.0012578               −0.0039838            0.0022323
  AW1                 0.20388          −0.22688               −0.16201                0.0071951          −0.0028616                0.0043505            0.00060222
  AW2                 0.15842          −0.14289               −0.14568                0.0022153          −0.00090324               0.0022975             0.0005136
  ZL                −0.077017          −0.00257               −0.02344              −0.00028538            0.0022044               −0.00023174          −0.0018018
  ZP                −0.35194           −0.18375               −0.49253              −0.0020028           −0.001167                 −0.0060887           −0.0013915
  ZB                  0.0080186        −0.098001                0.033125              0.001098             0.0012575              −7.54E−05              0.0010577
  BB                  0.24481          −0.13611               −0.01532                0.0047537          −0.0017854                0.0063639           −0.002689
  IOC                 0.40055          −0.49845                 0.088899              0.0094794            0.0054394               0.0094494            −0.0034131
  RW2               −0.1057            −0.30612               −0.049949               0.0029669            0.0020517               −0.0067643            0.0071927
  NL                −0.2201              0.11725              −0.03161              −4.89E−05            −0.0027306               −0.010025            −0.000524
  RL                −0.21935             0.1219                 0.063147            −0.0021651             0.0006078              −0.006809             −0.0010116
  OL                −0.037728            0.019585               0.16407             −0.0038804             0.0037381               0.00080492           −0.00018664
  OCW                 0.25364          −0.13822                 0.1041                0.0032537            0.0029731               0.0083603            −0.0027789
  ML                −0.079334            0.051403               0.063133            −0.0021905           −0.00022496               −0.0023266           −0.0022353
  mTRL                0.25686            0.31782                0.12376             −0.0048572           −0.0018976                0.00073995           −0.0030516
  Eigenvalue          0.0041704          0.00104178             0.00070736            1.3505               0.66717                 0.31121               0.13745
  % variance        44.71               11.17                   7.58                54.76                27.05                    12.62                  5.57
Note: Phyllotis bonariensis (N = 6), P. caprinus (N = 16), clade of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris (N = 155), clade of P. sp. 2 (N = 47) and clade of P. vaccarum
(N = 283). Loadings of the variables, eigenvalues and proportion of the variance explained for the first 3 principal components (PC) and the first 4 discriminant
functions (DF). Results are based on log10-transformed craniodental variables. See ‘Material and Methods’ for variable abbreviations.
analysis shows that representative specimens of this clade                              4.3      |    The clade of P. caprinus
are, on average, the smallest of all studied populations in the
eastern Andean slopes of Argentina (Table 1, Figures 8 and                              P. caprinus was described on the basis of external and skull
9). More importantly, significant size differences, for several                         (qualitative and quantitative) characters by Pearson (1958).
external and cranial traits, separate representatives of this                           Shortly after its original description, Hershkovitz (1962)
clade from the sympatric P. caprinus and P. vaccarum clades                             considered this nominal form to be a subspecies of the poly-
(Supplementary Material S2), and there are even some shape                              typic P. darwini (along with all taxa currently allocated to
differences in the skull with P. caprinus (Figure 9). The                               the P. xanthopygus complex), but most of the subsequent au-
rounded interorbital region, the frontoparietal suture mostly                           thors retained it as different species (e.g. Cabrera, 1961; Jayat
‘U’ shaped, the narrow rostrum and the simplified enamel                                et al., 2016; Steppan, 1998; Steppan and Ramírez, 2015). The
molar pattern on the upper molar series are qualitative char-                           close phylogenetic relationship among P. caprinus and other
acters that also support its differentiation (Figures 2 and 3).                         nominal forms included in the P. xanthopygus species com-
Despite these differences, the taxonomic status of this form                            plex was first mentioned by Jayat et al. (2016) based on molec-
still needs further studies, including evaluating samples of                            ular grounds. The phylogenetic analyses conducted by Ojeda
northern Bolivia and Peru.                                                              et al. (2021) consistently (in the Bayesian and the Maximum
JAYAT et al.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                               |   15
Likelihood analyses) placed specimens of this clade as more        Riverón, 2011; Steppan et al., 2007). Ojeda et al. (2021)
closely related to representatives of the clade of P. xanthopy-    corroborated this relationship after adding specimens of the
gus s.s. (samples from Patagonia, south of the Limay river)        nominal form ricardulus to the already included rupestris
than to specimens of the sympatric P. x. posticalis-P. x. ru-     and vaccarum, plus specimens from additional localities of
pestris and the P. vaccarum clades. Mean pairwise genetic          western Argentina. Genetic p-distances between P. limatus
distances among this and the other clades are large, between       and the clade of P. vaccarum range from 2.6% to 3.7% and
7.7% and 10.2% (Ojeda et al., 2021), well in line with the         are the smallest distances among the eight main clades ob-
values observed among other Phyllotis species (e.g. Jayat          tained by Ojeda et al. (2021). Steppan (1998) first argued for
et al., 2016; Ojeda et al., 2021; Rengifo & Pacheco, 2017).        the specific status of P. limatus on distinctive morphology
The karyotype described for this taxon is nearly identical to      (e.g. uniquely quite narrow and deep incisors, short to mod-
other populations of the P. xanthopygus complex, having a          erate molar row, light coloration, belly frequently white),
2n = 38, FNa = 72, with 36 size-graded biarmed autosomes,         monophyly of the mitochondrial lineage and geographic
a large submetacentric X, and a small metacentric Y chro-          distribution (P. limatus are mainly restricted to western
mosome (Pearson & Patton, 1976). However, our morpho-              Andean areas). Genetic sampling was however very limited
logical results are in line with the phylogenetic and genetic      in Steppan (1998). Kuch et al. (2002) and Albright (2004)
evidence, supporting the specific status of this nominal form.     suggested a recent speciation for P. limatus, which could be
Pearson (1958: pg. 434) noted the broad rostrum and interor-       an independent lineage diverging in the last ~140,000 years.
bital breadth of this species when compared to other Phyllotis     We examined specimens of P. limatus and corroborated its
species in general and with P. xanthopygus (=P. darwini) in        distinctiveness from specimens of the clade of P. vaccarum
particular. We confirm the applicability of these metric char-     with regard to the former's quite narrow and deep incisors.
acters in separating P. caprinus from most other samples here      Specimens referred to P. vaccarum from western Argentina
studied, but also note the smaller ears, bullae, and molars of     and central Chile have differences in the amount of consti-
this species (Table 1). As mentioned previously, representa-       tutive heterochromatin of their karyotypes when compared
tives of this form could be separated from sympatric popula-       with individuals of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris and P. sp.
tions of the clade of P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris through    2 (cf. Labaroni et al., 2014; Walker et al., 1991). Mean pair-
several qualitative (see Pearson, 1958; Steppan and Ramírez,       wise genetic distances between specimens of the clade of
2015; and Figures 2 and 3) and quantitative state characters       P. vaccarum and those of other clades within the complex
(Table 1 and Supplementary Material S2). It is morphomet-          of P. xanthopygus (excluding limatus) range from 7.9% to
rically more similar to specimens of the clade of P. vacca-        9.7% (see Table 1 in Ojeda et al., 2021), values that are in
rum. In addition to the morphometric characters separating         line with other recognized species. Samples of specimens
them from most other samples, there are a few qualitative          corresponding to this clade are intermediate in size between
morphological characters (e.g. the shape of the interorbital       the populations here analysed, being on average larger than
region and the frontoparietal suture) that could be useful in      samples of the sympatric P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris
separating both forms. Furthermore, all multivariate analyses      and somewhat smaller compared with the sympatric P. sp.
including size consistently separate these two forms at dif-       2 (Table 1). Although specimens of this clade overlapped
ferent ends (of the PCII and of the DF II) of the multivariate     with samples of the P. x. posticalis-P. x. rupestris and the P.
morphometric space (Figures 8 and 9). In short, our analysis       sp. 2 clades in the univariate statistic comparisons, several
and several other sources of evidence indicate that the con-       metric characters can be useful in segregate them (Table 1
sideration of this nominal form as a valid species is the more     and Supplementary Material S2). The PCA and the DFA
strongly supported taxonomic hypothesis. This geographi-           also show this overlap (both, in size and shape of the skull),
cally restricted form inhabits a relatively small geographic       but the confusion matrix of the sDFA successfully classified
area in shrubby habitats on the eastern Andean slopes of           more than 72% of its specimens. A more detailed quantitative
northwestern Argentina and southern Bolivia, between 2,100         and qualitative comparison of this form with representatives
and 4,500 m (Steppan & Ramírez, 2015; Figure 1) and is sep-        of P. sp. 2 will be developed in the following paragraphs.
arate by more than 1,600 km of its sister P. xanthopygus s.s.      This clade includes specimens from several populations
in the Patagonian steppe.                                          on eastern Andean slopes (from northern Chile and north-
                                                                   western Argentina south to northeastern Neuquén Province,
                                                                   Argentina), three of them coming from the type localities
4.4     |      The clade of P. vaccarum                            of the nominal forms ricardulus, oreigenus, and vaccarum.
                                                                   Although we documented some morphometric differences
Phylogenies based on cytb have placed specimens of this            in the univariate analysis for the nominal form ricardulus,
clade (alternatively referred as x. vaccarum, or x. rupestris in   size and shape multivariate analyses showed that specimens
previous studies) as sister to P. limatus (e.g. Albright, 2004;    of this nominal form (and those representing oreigenus
16
     |                                                                                                                JAYAT et al.
and vaccarum) are well inside the convex hull polygons of          not detected in other clades (Labaroni et al., 2014). Teta
other populations of this clade (sPCA and sfPCA analysis)          et al. (2018) observed the morphometric similarities of pop-
or cannot be correctly classified consistently (sDFA and           ulations of this clade with that of populations belonging to
sfDFA) from populations coming from different geographic           other clades of the P. xanthopygus complex. Notwithstanding,
areas (Supplementary Material S3). Furthermore, we do              specimens of this clade were distinguishable from other spe-
not find differences in qualitative skull characters between       cies of this complex on univariate and multivariate analy-
them (Figures 4 and 5) or sharp morphometric discontinui-          ses (Figures 8 and 9; Table 1 and Supplementary Material
ties among populations along latitudinal or environmental          S3). These differences, complemented and integrated
gradients (Supplementary Material S3) to diagnose them as          with other sources of evidence (e.g. genealogical relation-
species. All evidence analysed suggests that this clade must       ships, genetic divergence, and karyotype characteristics),
be recognized at the species level and vaccarum appears as         strongly indicate that this clade represents a distinct and
the most appropriate name for this species. Pearson (1958)         unnamed species. Here, we describe and compare this new
used the name rupestris for a short tailed, small sized and        entity with related species of the P. xanthopygus complex
pale form, distributed from southern Peru to northwestern          (Supplementary Material S6). The new name was regis-
Argentina (in Jujuy Province); in contrast, individuals we         tered in the Official Register of Zoological Nomenclature
assign to P. vaccarum are large-bodied, long tailed and with      (ZooBank) with number LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.
generally more richly coloured pelage, being distributed from      org:pub:E39D9E98-CC02-4D2E-AC32-3573136FE6EE.
northern Chile and southern Jujuy, south to central Chile and
west-central Argentina (cf. Pearson, 1958). Steppan (1998)
argued that the location of the rupestris type is uncertain be-    4.6   |   Final remarks
cause the original description gives the location as ‘un trou
de rocher des hautes montagnes de Cobija’ (‘a rock hole in         Although we think that accumulated evidence (i.e. molecu-
the high mountains of Cobija;’ Gervais 1841:51) and could          lar, morphologic, cytogenetic) has contributed substantially
therefore either be near the coast in the coastal ranges east of   to species delimitation of populations of the genus Phyllotis
Cobija (as argued by Heshkovitz, 1964) or high in the Andes        distributed on western Andean slops of central Argentina, un-
near San Pedro de Atacama (as argued by Pearson, 1958).            doubtedly there is a need to include additional approaches to
Both possible locations are at the extreme northwestern limit      further refine our knowledge. These must include the study
of this species, rather than near the core of the distribution,    of nuclear DNA sequences (the mtDNA gene tree may de-
but are also within the range of P. limatus, a species distin-     part from the species tree due to lineage sorting of ancestral
guished principally by incisor shape, a trait not measured         polymorphisms or later introgression), environmental niche
by Gervais. The type of rupestris is lost (Steppan, 1998),         preferences and the biogeographic history of these popu-
making it impossible from the available evidence to deter-         lations, among others. Similarly, there is a need for assess
mine which species that animal was a member of. Ojeda              populations from the western side of the Andes, in particular
et al. (2021) also highlighted the convenience, in terms of        Chilean populations, which could help to adequately deline-
taxonomic stability, of referring populations of specimens         ate the species diversity of this complex species group. Small
representing this clade to vaccarum rather than rupestris.         mammal diversity studies in Andean ecosystems are urgently
Consequently, we recognize vaccarum as the oldest avail-           needed in light of major threats (e.g. habitat degradation as-
able name that can be assigned to this taxon (see the taxo-        sociated to open mining operations, biological invasions, cat-
nomic discussion in Ojeda et al., 2021 and further comments        tle overgrazing, exotic species and climate change; Ceballos
on the taxonomic account of this species in Supplementary          & Ehrlich, 2006; Nuñez et al., 2009; Reborati, 2005; Zapata-
Material S5). Here we formally recognize the specific status       Ríos & Branch, 2016). Even when the systematics of the leaf-
of this form, including a taxonomic account, an emended            eared mice is one of the most studied in South America, the
diagnosis, a thorough analysis of morphologic variations           description of the new species, P. pehuenche new sp., high-
and a geographic distribution description for the species          lights a common theme in Neotropic mammalogy. That is,
(Supplementary Material S5).                                       the need to fulfil the Linnean deficit through exploration and
                                                                   description of the tremendous diversity of small mammals
                                                                   within a phylogenetic and integrative taxonomic framework,
4.5      |    The clade of P. sp. 2                                particularly for those complexes of almost morphologically
                                                                   cryptic species.
Evidence for the recognition of this clade was first provided
by phylogenetic analysis of molecular data (Albright, 2004;        ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Riverón, 2011; Ojeda et al., 2021). In addition, specimens         We thank R. Gonzalez, F. Barbiere, P. Cuello and A.
of P. sp. 2 have distinctive chromosome characteristics            Tarquino for helping us during fieldwork. Ulyses F. Pardiñas
JAYAT et al.                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                    |   17
graciously provided tissues. We also thank the critical review               Jackson, D. A. (1993). Stopping rules in principal components analysis:
for three anonymous reviewers on the first submission of                         A comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology, 74,
                                                                                 2204–2214. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939574
the manuscript. Financial support on this research was pro-
                                                                             Jayat, J. P., D’Elia, G., Pardiñas, U. F. J., & Namen, J. G. (2007). A new
vided by the National Council for Science and Technology                         species of Phyllotis (Rodentia, Cricetidae, Sigmodontine) from the
of Argentina, CONICET (PIP 11220150100258CO),                                    upper montane forest of the Yungas of northwestern Argentina. In: D.
Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica                           A. Kelt, E. P. Lessa, J. Salazar-Bravo, & J. L. Patton (eds.). The quint-
(PICT 1636 and PICT 2012-0050) and the National Science                         essential naturalist: honoring the life and legacy of Oliver P. Pearson,
Foundation (DEB-0108422, DEB-0841447, DEB-1754748                             pp. 775–798. University of California, Publications in Zoology, 134.
to SJS). We are grateful by the support of our research                          https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520098596.003.0022
                                                                             Jayat, J. P., Ortiz, P. E., González, F. R., & D’Elía, G. (2016). Taxonomy
institutions, universities and the Dirección de Recursos
                                                                                 of the Phyllotis osilae species group in Argentina; the status of the
Renovables, Mendoza, for collection permits (N° 461-1-04-
                                                                                 “Rata de los nogales” (Phyllotis nogalaris Thomas, 1921; Rodentia:
03873. RES 405).                                                                 Cricetidae). Zootaxa, 4083, 397–        417. https://doi.org/10.11646/
                                                                                 zootaxa.4083.3.5
ORCID                                                                        Kuch, M., Rohland, N., Betancourt, J. L., Latorre, C., Steppan, S., &
J. Pablo Jayat        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-2987                      Poinar, H. N. (2002). Molecular analysis of a 11 700–year–old ro-
                                                                                 dent midden from the Atacama Desert, Chile. Molecular Ecology,
R E F E R E NC E S                                                               11, 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01492.x
                                                                             Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., & Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA
Albright, J. C. (2004). Phylogeography of the sigmodontine rodent,
                                                                                 X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing plat-
    Phyllotis xanthopygus, and a test of the sensitivity of nested clade
                                                                                 forms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(6), 1547–1549. https://
    analysis to elevation–based alternative distances. M.S. Thesis. The
                                                                                 doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
    Florida State University. 46 pp.
                                                                             Labaroni, C. A., Malleret, M. M., Novillo, A., Ojeda, A., Rodriguez, D.,
Barbière, F., Ronez, C., Ortiz, P. E., Martin, R. A., & Pardiñas, U. F. J.
                                                                                 Cuello, P., Ojeda, R., Marti, D., & Lanzone, C. (2014). Karyotypic
    (2019). A new nomenclatural system for the study of sigmodontine
                                                                                 variation in the Andean rodent Phyllotis xanthopygus (Waterhouse,
    rodent molars: First step towards an integrative phylogeny of fossil
                                                                                 1837) (Rodentia, Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae). Comparatype
    and living cricetids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 127,
                                                                                 Cytogenetics, 8, 369–381. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.
    224–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz021
                                                                                 v8i4.8115
Cabrera, A. (1926). Dos roedores nuevos de las montañas de Catamarca.
                                                                             Libardi, G. S., & Percequillo, A. R. (2016). Variation of cranioden-
    Revista Chilena De Historia Natural, 30, 319–321.
                                                                                 tal traits in russet rats Euryoryzomys russatus (Wagner, 1848)
Cabrera, A. (1961). Catálogo de los mamíferos de América del Sur.
                                                                                 (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) from Eastern Atlantic
    Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino
                                                                                 Forest. Zoologischer Anzeiger –A Journal of Comparative Zoology,
    Rivadavia”. Ciencias Zoológicas, 4, 309–732.
                                                                                 262, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2016.03.005
Ceballos, G., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2006). Global mammal distributions, bio-
                                                                             Maddison, W. P., & Maddison, D. R. (2017). Mesquite: A modular sys-
    diversity hotspots, and conservation. Proceedings of the National
                                                                                 tem for evolutionary analysis. Available Online at: http://mesquitepr
    Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(51),
                                                                                 oject.org
    19374–19379. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609334103
                                                                             Meachen-Samuels, J., & Van Valkenburgh, B. (2009). Craniodental
Crespo, J. A. (1964). Descripción de una nueva subespecie de roedor
                                                                                 indicators of prey size preference in the Felidae. Biological
    filotino. Neotrópica, 10, 99–101.
                                                                                 Journal of the Linnean Society, 96, 784–              799. https://doi.
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R., & Posada, D. (2012). jModelT-
                                                                                 org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01169.x
    est 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature
                                                                             Myers, P. (1989). A preliminary revision of the varius group of Akodon
    Methods, 9, 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
                                                                                 (A. dayi, dolores, molinae, neocenus, simulator, toba and varius).
Ferro, L. I., Martínez, J. J., & Barquez, R. M. (2010). A new species
                                                                                 In K. H. Redford, & J. F. Eisenberg (ed.), Advances in neotropical
    of Phyllotis (Rodentia, Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae) from Tucumán
                                                                                 mammalogy (pp. 5–54). Sandhill Crane Press, Inc.
    Province, Argentina. Mammalian Biology, 75, 523–537. https://doi.
                                                                             Myers, P., Patton, J. L., & Smith, M. F. (1990). A review of the boliv-
    org/10.1016/j.mambio.2009.09.005
                                                                                 iensis group of Akodon (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) with emphasis
Frontier, S. (1976). Etude de la decroissance des valeurs propres dans
                                                                                 on Peru and Bolivia. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of
    une analyse en composantes principales: Comparaison avec le mod-
                                                                                 Zoology, University of Michigan, 177, 1–89.
    ele du baton brise. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and
                                                                             Nuñez, M. N., Solman, S. A., & Cabre, M. F. (2009). Regional cli-
    Ecology, 25, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(76)90076-9
                                                                                 mate change experiments over southern South America. II: Climate
Hammer, O., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). Past:
                                                                                 change scenarios in the late twenty-first century. Climate Dynamics,
    Paleontological statistics software package for education and data
                                                                                 32, 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0449-8
    analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9.
                                                                             Ojeda, A. A., Teta, P., Jayat, J. P., Lanzone, C., Cornejo, P., Novillo, A.,
Hershkovitz, P. (1962). Evolution of Neotropical cricetine rodents
                                                                                 & Ojeda, R. A. (2021). Phylogenetic relationships among cryptic
    (Muridae) with special reference to the phyllotine group. Fieldiana
                                                                                 species of the Phyllotis xanthopygus complex (Rodentia, Cricetidae).
    Zoology, 46, 1–524. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.2781
                                                                                 Zoologica Scripta, 50, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12472
Hubbs, C. L., & Hubbs, C. (1953). An improved graphical analysis and
                                                                             Pacheco, V., Rengifo, E. M., & Vivas, D. (2014). Una nueva especie
    comparison of series of samples. Systematic Zoology, 2(2), 49–56.
                                                                                 de ratón orejón del género Phyllotis Waterhouse, 1837 (Rodentia:
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2411659
18
     |                                                                                                                                   JAYAT et al.
    Cricetidae) del norte del Perú. Therya, 5, 81–     508. https://doi.       South America, Volume 2, Rodents (pp. 535–555), The University of
    org/10.12933/therya-14-185                                              Chicago Press Chicago and London. https://doi.org/10.7208/chica
Pearson, O. P. (1958). A taxonomic revision of the rodent genus                 go/9780226169606.001.0001
    Phyllotis. University of California, Publications in Zoology, 56,       Steppan, S. J., Ramirez, O., Banbury, J., Huchon, D., Pacheco, V.,
    391–496.                                                                   Walker, L. I., & Spotorno, A. E. (2007). A molecular reappraisal
Pearson, O. P. (1972). New Information on ranges and relationships              of the systematics of the leaf–eared mice Phyllotis and their rela-
    within the rodent genus Phyllotis in Peru and Ecuador. Journal of           tives. In D. A. Kelt, E. P. Lessa, J. Salazar-Bravo, & J. L. Patton
    Mammalogy, 53, 677–686. https://doi.org/10.2307/1379206                    (Eds.), The Quintessential Naturalist: Honoring the Life and Legacy
Pearson, O. P., & Patton, J. L. (1976). Relationships among South               of Oliver P. Pearson (pp. 799–     826). University of California,
    American phyllotine rodents based on chromosome analysis. Journal           Publications of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1525/calif   ornia/
                                                                                                                                                97805
    of Mammalogy, 57, 339–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/1379693                 20098596.001.0001
Reborati, C. (2005). Situación ambiental en las ecorregiones Puna           Storz, J. F., Quiroga-Carmona, M., Opazo, J. C., Bowen, T., Farson,
    y Altos Andes. In: A. Brown, U. Martinez Ortiz, M. Acerbi, & J.             M., Steppan, S. J., & D'Elia, G. (2020). Discovery of the world's
    Corcuera (eds.). La Situación Ambiental Argentina 2005 (pp. 32–            highest-dwelling mammal. Proceedings of the National Academy of
    47), Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina.                                    Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 18169–18171. https://
Reig, O. A. (1978). Roedores cricétidos del Plioceno superior de la             doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005265117
    provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Publicaciones Del Museo          Teta, P., Jayat, J. P., Lanzone, C., Novillo, A., Ojeda, A., & Ojeda, R.
    Municipal De Ciencias Naturales De Mar Del Plata Lorenzo                    A. (2018). Geographic variation in quantitative skull traits and
    Scaglia, 2, 164–190.                                                       systematics of southern populations of the leaf-eared mice of the
Rengifo, E. M., & Pacheco, V. (2015). Taxonomic revision of the Andean          Phyllotis xanthopygus complex (Cricetidae, Phyllotini) in southern
    leaf–eared mouse, Phyllotis andium Thomas 1912 (Rodentia:                  South America. Zootaxa, 4446, 68–      80. https://doi.org/10.11646/
    Cricetidae), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa, 4018,          zootaxa.4446.1.5
    349–380. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4018.3.2                   Thomas, O. (1912). New bats and rodents from S. America. The Annals
Rengifo, E. M., & Pacheco, V. (2017). Phylogenetic position of the              and Magazine of Natural History, 8(10), 403–411.
    Ancash leaf-eared mouse Phyllotis definitus Osgood 1915 (Rodentia:     Thomas, O. (1919). On small mammals from “Otro Cerro”, north-east-
    Cricetidae). Mammalia, 82, 153–       166. https://doi.org/10.1515/        ern Rioja, collected by Sr. E. Budin. The Annals and Magazine of
    mammalia-2016-0138                                                       Natural History, 9(3), 489–500.
Riverón, S. (2011). Estructura poblacional e historia demográfica           Walker, L. I., Spotorno, A. E., & Arrau, J. (1984). Cytogenetic and re-
    del “pericote patagónico” Phyllotis xanthopygus (Rodentia:                  productive studies of two nominal subspecies of Phyllotis darwini
    Sigmodontinae) en Patagonia Argentina. Ph. D. Dissertation (pp.             and their experimental hybrids. Journal of Mammalogy, 65, 220–
    100). Uruguay: Universidad de la República.                                 230. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381161
Sievers, F., Wilm, A., Dineen, D., Gibson, T. J., Karplus, K., Li, W.,      Walker, L. I., Spotorno, A. E., & Sans, J. (1991). Genome size variation
    Lopez, R., McWilliam, H., Remmert, M., Söding, J., Thompson,                and its phenotypic consequences in Phyllotis rodents. Hereditas,
    J. D., & Higgins, D. G. (2011). Fast, scalable generation of high-         115, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1991.tb03542.x
    quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.       Zapata-Ríos, G., & Branch, L. C. (2016). Altered activity patterns and
    Molecular Systematics and Biology, 7, 539. https://doi.org/10.1038/         reduced abundance of native mammals in sites with feral dogs in
    msb.2011.75                                                                 the high Andes. Biological Conservation, 193, 9–16. https://doi.
Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based                org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.016
    phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.
    Bioinformatics, 22, 2688–2690. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinforma
    tics/btl446                                                             SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Steppan, S. J. (1993). Phylogenetic relationships among the Phyllotini      Additional supporting information may be found online in
    (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) using morphological characters. Journal       the Supporting Information section.
    of Mammalian Evolution, 1, 187–       213. https://doi.org/10.1007/
    BF01024707
Steppan, S. J. (1995). Revision of the tribe Phyllotini (Rodentia:             How to cite this article: Jayat, J. P., Teta, P.,
    Sigmodontinae), with a phylogenetic hypothesis for the                     Ojeda, A. A., Steppan, S. J., Osland, J. M., Ortiz, P. E.,
    Sigmodontinae. Fieldiana Zoology, New Series, 80, 1–112. https://
                                                                               Novillo, A., Lanzone, C., & Ojeda, R. A. (2021). The
    doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.3336
                                                                               Phyllotis xanthopygus complex (Rodentia, Cricetidae)
Steppan, S. J. (1998). Phylogenetic relationships and species limits
    within Phyllotis (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): Concordance between            in central Andes, systematics and description of a new
    mtDNA sequence and morphology. Journal of Mammalogy, 7, 573–              species. Zoologica Scripta, 00, 1–18. https://doi.
    593. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382988                                       org/10.1111/zsc.12510
Steppan, S. J., & Ramírez, O. (2015). Genus Phyllotis Waterhouse, 1837.
    In: J. L. Patton, U. F. J. Pardiñas, & G. D’Elía (eds.). Mammals of