H Pylori 4
H Pylori 4
Abstract
Background Helicobacter pylori is a worldwide pathogen that affects both animals and humans with a wide
environmental distribution, causing serious health problems in humans. This research has timely addressed the
topic of new sources of H. pylori infection, which is currently a global issue, especially in developing countries. For
this purpose, 115 Tilapia fish, 50 freshwater samples, and 88 fish-handlers’ stool samples were investigated for the
presence of H. pylori in Qena Governorate, Egypt. The applied techniques were antigen screening tests, culturing, and
molecular methods through ureC gene amplification, and 16 S rRNA characterization.
Results Helicobacter pylori was detected in 7.83%, 14%, 4.35%, and 12% of the investigated fish and water samples
by culture and PCR methods, respectively. Out of the total studied participants, 40 tested positive for H. pylori
when screened by stool antigen test, of which 35 (39.77%), and 31 (35.23%) were confirmed by conventional and
molecular techniques, respectively. The Fisher’s exact test has shown a statistically significant correlation between H.
pylori infection, sex, and age as risk factors, while the association was insignificant concerning the residence. Males
contracted the infection at a higher rate than females (48.08% and 16.67%, respectively). Also, H. pylori infection rate
was the highest among fish-handlers aged 36–45 years old (46.67%), followed by the 26–35 years old age group
(39.53%). With regard to the residence, a higher occurrence rate was recorded in the rural (36.07%) than the urban
population (33.33%). Helicobacter pylori isolates harbored the highest antimicrobial resistance against ampicillin
(100%), metronidazole (95.24%), while the least antimicrobial resistance was recorded against levofloxacin (21.43%),
and clarithromycin (26.20%). The phylogenetic analysis revealed a high degree of homology between the isolates
selected from Tilapia fish, freshwater, and fish-handlers.
Conclusions Our data emphasized the role that fish and freshwater play in disseminating H. pylori infection as one of
the diseases that has a significant public health issue.
Keywords Antibiotic resistance, Fish, H. Pylori, Human, Phylogeny
1
*Correspondence: Department of Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley
Asmaa Gaber Mubarak University, Qena 83523, Egypt
2
a_mubarek@vet.svu.edu.eg Department of Cell and Tissues, Faculty of Vet. Medicine, Assiut
Hanan H. Abd-Elhafeez University, Assiut 71526, Egypt
3
hhnnzz91@aun.edu.eg Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South
Hams M. A. Mohamed Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt
hams.mohamed@vet.svu.edu.eg
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available
in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 2 of 11
Amplification and sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene recommendations were followed while measuring zone
In order to partially amplify and sequence the 16SrRNA diameters.
gene, six isolates were randomly selected from freshwa-
ter, Tilapia fish, and fish handlers (two of each) (Table 1). Statistical analysis
The amplification condition and PCR components were SPSS version. 28 was used for the statistical analysis of
performed according to Chèneby et al. [27]. The PCR the study’s data. Through Geisser-Greenhouse’s epsilon
products were separated using 5 V/cm gradient elec- calculation, the connection between the positive H. pylori
trophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel (Applichem GmbH, infection and the sources of the investigated samples was
Darmstadt, Germany) at room temperature. 20µL of the determined. Fisher’s exact test was computed to establish
products were put into each gel slot. A gel documenta- the risk factors, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) was
tion system (Alpha Innotech, Biometra, Göttingen, Ger- calculated. For the variations in prevalence rates, p-val-
many) used to photograph the gel. The QIA quick PCR ues under 0.05 were regarded as significant.
Product extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was used
to purify the PCR products. For the sequence reaction, Results
Bigdye Terminator V3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Perkin- In this study, H. pylori was found to have a total incidence
Elmer) was used, and then was purified using Centrisep of 20.16% using conventional methods, and 16.60% using
spin column. DNA sequences were obtained by Applied PCR, as presented in Table 2; Fig. 1. As an unusual source
Biosystems 3130 genetic analyzer (HITACHI, Tokyo, of infection, the current study revealed a culture preva-
Japan). lence of H. pylori in Tilapia fish of 7.83% (9 out of 115)
collected from various freshwater streams. These iso-
Phylogenetic analysis lates displayed a negative nitrate reduction biochemical
Using the MegAlign module from the Lasergene pack- profile and positive results for catalase, oxidase, and urea
age (version 7), the phylogenetic tree was created. By hydrolysis tests. When confirmed using the ureC gene,
comparing our 16SrRNA sequences to those found in the only five samples (4.35%) tested positive. Out of the 50
database, MEGA6 software was used to create a neigh- freshwater samples, seven tested positive for H. pylori
bor-joining phylogenetic tree [28]. using conventional method, while six were positive using
PCR. Regarding the human stool samples, 40 of the 88
Phenotypic detection of antibiotic resistance fish-handlers initially tested positive for H. pylori through
According to Ranjabar et al. [29], antimicrobial suscep- an antigenic test, and their samples were subsequently
tibility testing for seven therapeutically useful antibiot- cultured, resulting in 35 positive samples (39.77%). How-
ics was completed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion ever, when these isolates were further confirmed using
method on Muller-Hinton supplemented with 5% defi- the ureC gene, only 31 of them (35.23%) were confirmed
brinated sheep blood and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h in as H. pylori. No significant difference was found between
a microaerophilic atmosphere (85% N2, 10% CO2, and 5% human infection with H. pylori and the contamination
O2) in accordance with the Clinical Laboratory Standards levels of Tilapia fish and freshwater streams as potential
Institute’s (CLSI, [30]) recommendations. Ampicillin sources of infection (P = 0.2679).
(AM, 10), metronidazole (MET, 5), erythromycin (ER, 5), A total of 88 fish handlers agreed to participate as vol-
clarithromycin (CLR, 2), amoxicillin (AMX, 10), levoflox- unteers in this study, with 52 being male and 36 being
acin (LEV, 5), and rifampicin (R, 30) (Thermo Fisher Sci- female, as shown in Table 3. The incidence of H. pylori
entific, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) were evaluated for in human stool samples differed significantly (P = 0.0479)
their concentrations in micrograms per disk (mcg/disk). with 48.08% among males compared to 16.67% among
The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, [30]) females. Participants’ ages ranged from 16 to over 45
years and were classified into four groups. Among these
age groups, participants aged between 36 and 45 years
Table 2 Helicobacter pylori in the examined samples had the highest H. pylori infection rate (46.67%), followed
The examined No. of Positive H. pylori Geisser- by the 26–35 age group (39.53%). These two age groups
samples examined Conventional PCR Green-
samples house’s
were significantly associated with the rate of H. pylori
methods
epsilon infection (95% CI, P = 0.0498). The age group of ˃ 45 years
No. (%) No. (%) R2 (P) exhibited an incidence of 30.77%, while, those aged 16–25
Tilapia fish 115 9 (7.83) 5 (4.35) 0.1175 had the lowest infection rate (17.65%). The residences of
Freshwater 50 7 (14) 6 (12) (0.2679) the participants were distributed as follows: 27 urban
streams and 61 rural. Rural residents had the highest prevalence
Fish-handlers 88 35 (39.77) 31 (35.23) of H. pylori (36.07%, 22/61) compared to urban residents
Total 253 51 (20.16) 42 (16.60) (33.33%, 9/27) with no significant difference (P ˃ 0.9999).
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 5 of 11
Fig. 1 Agarose gel electrophoresis of ureC (glmM) gene showing bands at 411 bp. Lane M: Marker (DNA ladder 100 bp), Lane P: positive control, Lane (1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19): positive ureC (glmM) gene, Lane 9: negative isolate, and Lane N: negative control
Table 3 H. pylori isolated from humans in association with risk amoxicillin (76.19%, 32/42), while a low frequency
factors of resistance to levofloxacin (21.43%, 9/42), and clar-
Variable No. of Positive H. 95% CI ithromycin (26.20%, 11/42) was reported. As shown in
examined pylori P Table (4), the MAR index ranged from 0.571 to 1 in the
cases No. (%) obtainedH. pylori isolates, with the highest index value
Sex Male 52 25 (48.08) 0.0479*^ of 1 found in one isolate of fish-handlers’ stool. It’s worth
Female 36 6 (16.67) noting that most of H. pylori isolates were multi-drug
Age 16–25 y 17 3 (17.65) 0.0498* resistant (MDR) to at least three classes of antibiotics as
26–35 y 43 17 (39.53) observed in Tilapia fish and human isolates.
36–45 y 15 7 (46.67)
˃ 45 y 13 4 (30.77) Discussion
Residence Urban 27 9 (33.33) > 0.9999^
Helicobacter pylori has emerged as one of the most con-
Rural 61 22 (36.07)
cerning human pathogens associated with water, conse-
^ = Fisher’s Exact Test
quently, it has the potential to contaminate marine food
* Significant value
products. While few studies have addressed this issue, the
current study tried to evaluate the prevalence of H. pylori
The sequencing results of partially amplified 16SrRNA in fish, freshwater streams, and fish handlers, along with
for six isolates, selected randomly from fish intestinal an evaluation of some the risk factors associated with
contents (OQ456179, OQ456180), freshwater streams the infection. Culturing of Tilapia fish samples revealed
(OR144424, OR144425), and fish-handlers’ stool an incidence of H. pylori at 7.83%, and after molecular
(OQ456181, OQ456182), confirmed that our isolates confirmation through the use of the ureC gene, only five
were indeed H. pylori. The phylogenetic analysis revealed isolates (4.35%) were identified as H. pylori. Wang et al.
a high level of identity (99–100%) among our isolates, [31] found that although bacteriological culture is con-
despite their diverse sources. Additionally, our isolates sidered as the gold standard for infection diagnosis, H.
were grouped with reference strains from Genbank such pylori poses particular challenges. It requires additional
as H. pylori NR044761, H. pylori OP810348, and H. pylori resources for growth, a microaerophilic environment,
KC9009952 with identities of 97.3–97.4%, 100%, and and extended incubation, making it difficult to conduct
99.5–100%, respectively (Fig. 2). timely sensitivity studies. The technical difficulties asso-
Of the 42 H. pylori isolates tested for antibiotic resis- ciated with H. pylori culture are evident, highlighting
tance, the results are provided in Fig. (3). These results the need for simpler and quicker methods to identify H.
revealed complete resistance to ampicillin (100%), fol- pylori and assess its resistance. Molecular techniques
lowed by metronidazole (95.24%, 40/42), and rifam- have yielded promising results in this regard [32].
picin (88.10%, 37/42). Closely related resistance rates Many researchers have endorsed the use of the
were observed for erythromycin (78.57%, 33/42), and ureC (glmM) gene as a genetic marker for H. pylori
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 6 of 11
Table 4 Antibiotic resistance profile of H. pylori isolates chain. Moreover, Cortés-Sánchez [12] has proved that
Sources of No Antimicrobial resistance profile MAR Tilapia fish are a vehicle for the transmission of H. pylori.
isolates index
Helicobacter pylori is a significant emerging patho-
Tilapia fish 1 AM, MET, RIF, ER 0.571
gen associated with water, raising significant concerns
2 AM, RIF, AMX, CLR 0.571
3 AM, RIF, AMX, ER, CLR 0.714 for the scientific community [36]. Al-Sulami et al. [25]
4 AM, MET, RIF, ER 0.571 were the first to identify 10 isolates of H. pylori in water
5 AM, MET, AMX 0.429 through biochemical tests. Our study has confirmed the
Fresh water 1 AM, MET, AMX, ER 0.571 presence of 7 isolates from 50 freshwater samples (14%)
streams 2 AM, MET, RIF, ER 0.571 using cultural and biochemical methods. When con-
3 AM, MET, RIF, ER, CLR 0.714
4 AM, MET, AMX, ER 0.571
firmed by PCR, six isolates were obtained, reducing the
5 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER, CLR 0.857 rate to 12%. Twing et al. [37] were also able to detect
6 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714 H. pylori in freshwater samples. In Basrah Governor-
Human 1 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER, LEV 0.857 ate, Iraq, water samples have been contaminated by H.
diarrhea 2 AM, MET, AMX, CLR 0.571 pylori at an incidence of 2.76% [25]. Meanwhile, in Egypt,
3 AM, MET, AMX, ER 0.571 two isolates from tap water and ground water (one from
4 AM, MET, RIF, ER, LEV 0.714
5 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714
each) were identified as H. pylori through direct detec-
6 AM, MET, RIF, ER 0.571 tion of the ureC gene [38]. Other authors all over the
7 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER, CLR, LEV 1 world succeeded in detecting the organism in various
8 AM, MET, RIF, AMX 0.571 types of water using different techniques. Ranjbar et al.
9 AM, MET, RIF, ER 0.571 [29] revealed that 3% of drinking water samples had H.
10 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.571
11 AM, MET, RIF, AMX,CLR, LEV 0.857
pylori through a combination of the culture method and
12 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714 the PCR technique based on 16 S rRNA. Also, H. pylori
13 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, LEV 0.714 could be detected in influent water samples in Colombia
14 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER, CLR 0.857 at a percentage of 22.6% [39]. Besides that, Farhadkhani
15 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714 et al. [11] detected H. pylori with a high frequency (36%)
16 AM, MET, RIF, ER, LEV 0.714
17 AM, MET, RIF, AMX 0.571
in wastewater samples, stressing that fecal pollution of
18 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER, CLR, LEV 1 water and other environmental samples plays an impor-
19 AM, MET, RIF, AMX 0.571 tant role in H. pylori infection transmission. On the other
20 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714 hand, Gholami-Borujeni et al. [1] reported that 24% of
21 AM, MET, RIF, AMX 0.571 water samples collected from urban areas, and 18% from
22 AM, MET, RIF, ER, LEV 0.714
23 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714
home water treatment devices in Iran tested positive for
24 AM, MET, RIF, ER 0.571 H. pylori.
25 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER, CLR 0.857 Differences in H. pylori prevalence in water could be
26 AM, MET, RIF, AMX,ER 0.714 attributed mainly to water characteristics including hard-
27 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714 ness, alkalinity, temperature, and pH, in addition to the
28 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714
29 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER, LEV 0.857
use of various methods for detection. Two hypotheses
30 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, ER 0.714 are supported by the presence of H. pylori DNA in river
31 AM, MET, RIF, AMX, CLR 0.714 water, well water, wastewater, and surface and shallow
Average 0.687 groundwater: either H. pylori is a waterborne organism
MAR index = No. of resistance / Total No. of tested antibiotics or water may become contaminated by the fecal-oral
route [25].
identification, particularly in clinical samples [33]. Addi- Helicobacter infection is a global zoonotic infection
tionally, Wongphutorn et al. [34] have recommended the with a high incidence, especially in Egypt [40]. In some
combination of several target genes for H. pylori detec- cases, H. pylori persists in the human host without caus-
tion, such as ureC and 16 S Rrna sequencing, to enhance ing illness. However, it has traditionally been linked to
diagnostic performance. various gastrointestinal illnesses due to induction of
Few authors have emphasized fish as a source of H. local and systemic inflammation [41]. Although human
pylori; Abdel-Moein et al. [14] could detect the organism infection with H. pylori has declined in many countries
in 1.9% of Tilapia fish. Pina-Pérez et al. [35] identified H. as a result of advances in treatment and improved living
pylori in various marine food products, including shell- standards, it still poses a significant risk in developing
fish. They verified the potential connection between the nations with overcrowded living conditions, inadequate
presence of H. pylori in seawater and the role of contam- sanitation, and unsafe drinking water. Therefore, inves-
inated seafood as means for H. pylori to enter the food tigating the prevalence rate in a large-scale population
is crucial, and various diagnostic methods for H. pylori
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 7 of 11
Fig. 2 Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of the obtained H. pylori isolates based on 16 S rRNA gene sequence
are available. In our study, we examined 88 fish-han- healthy asymptomatic residents in the United Arab Emir-
dlers for the presence of H. pylori using the stool Ag ates as H. pylori positive. While higher detection rates
test, which yielded 40 positive samples (45.45%). This were observed in the Egyptian patients stools by Salem
method has been endorsed by many authors as rapid, et al. [7] and Shaaban et al. [44] at 73.7% and 74.8%,
reliable, and non-random [42]. A closely related result respectively, using the rapid antigen test, On the other
was obtained by Khoder et al. [43] who recorded 41% of hand, lower results were reported by Hassan et al. [45],
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 8 of 11
Almashhadany and Mayass [46], and Seid et al. [47] as 25, infection (17.65%); this result was proportionate with
30.4, and 18.45%, respectively. This disparity in H. pylori that obtained by Shah et al. [55], who recorded the low-
prevalence could be attributed to the sociodemographic est infection rate in the youngest age group 11–30 years
status of the investigated population, geographical varia- (19.8%). Nevertheless, different results were recorded
tions, and hygienic measures. On the other hand, the by previous studies, which were conducted by Khoder
results of the stool antigen test can be impacted by the et al. [43], who found that H. pylori infection increased
heterogeneity of the antigens, the serological procedures extremely with age, and Shaaban et al. [44], who recov-
used, and the amount of antigen present in the stool [48]. ered the highest infection rate in the over 50 years age
After culturing stool samples, the incidence rate of H. group (87.3%), followed by the 15–50 years age group
pylori has decreased to 39.77% (35/88). A compatible (76.8%). On the other hand, Mehesin et al. [42] demon-
result was obtained by Fabricio-Guaman et al. [49] who strated that there was no correlation between the preva-
obtained a lower incidence rate of H. pylori in patients by lence of H. pylori infection and age.
culture method (36%), than by antigenic screening test Along the same lines as other studies in terms of resi-
(50%). Contrarily, Abu-Gharbia et al. [50] recorded an dence, our findings indicated a higher prevalence of H.
incidence rate of H. pylori in patients attending Assiut pylori infection in rural residents (36.07%) than in urban
University Hospital and some laboratories at incidence residents (33.33%), with no significant difference. Salem
rates of 76.9% and 86.1% by stool antigen and culture et al. [7] stated that farmers are more likely to contract H.
methods, respectively. pylori infection (82.1%) than non-farmers (64.9%). Mehe-
PCR-based techniques are crucial for fast and accurate sin et al. [42] recorded an infection rate among rural and
identification of H. pylori infections among patients [51]. urban populations of 60.7 and 39.3%, respectively. Also,
So, in the present study, the ureC gene was amplified to Shaaban et al. [44] declared that the infection was more
confirm that the isolates yielded a 35.23% incidence rate. prevalent in those living in rural areas (88.5%) than in
Another point of this investigation includes the occur- those settling in urban areas (51.7%). This may be due to
rence of H. pylori in fish-handlers according to some risk the socio-economic status of the population, low edu-
factors such as sex, age, and residence. According to the cational level, poor hygienic conditions, and inadequate
current study results, a statistically significant correlation living resources. These factors facilitate the acquisition
between sex and the occurrence of H. pylori infection has of infection, as well as contact with animals, which are
been found. Based on molecular detection, males were considered a significant source of infection, as various
more infected (25, 48.08%) compared with females (6, studies have shown. This supports the theory that it is a
16.67%). Contrarily, a slightly higher infection rate was zoonotic disease.
detected in females (19.55%) than in males (16.44%) by The 16SrRNA gene displays a high level of functional
using an antigen screening test [46]. Through molecular and evolutionary homology within all bacteria, mak-
and serological studies, which were done by Castro et al. ing it a common choice for H. pylori detection [56]. In
[52], Mehesin et al. [42], and Shaaban et al. [44], there was this study, the sequencing of the 16SrRNA gene played
no significant higher infection rate in females than males, a major role in confirming our isolates as H. pylori, a
as 14.6, 11.2 and 55.5, 44.5 and 79.7, 65.5%, respectively. finding supported by Gong and El-Omar [57]. The phy-
Moreover, Rasheed et al. [53] and Wang et al. [22] were in logenetic analysis revealed that our isolates were closely
agreement with our result that males were more prone to related to reference strains found in the human gastro-
H. pylori infection than females. This could be explained intestinal tracts. This raises concerns about the poten-
by the greater exposure of males to environmental fac- tial role of the fecal-oral route in the transmission of this
tors as a result of working outside homes for longer peri- microorganism.
ods than females. According to the latest studies on the Increasing rates of H. Pylori resistance are associated
worldwide prevalence of H. pylori, there are no variances with a number of clinical issues; the gradual increase in
in H. pylori infection based on sex [54]. the number of antibiotic-resistant H. pylori strains and
This study included 88 fish-handlers at ages rang- their diverse resistance profiles makes treatment more
ing from 16 to more than 45 years old; the vast major- challenging and necessitates more pertinent research.
ity of the participants were 26–35 years old. The highest Furthermore, chromosome-encoded mutations are most
level of H. pylori infection was reported significantly in frequently attributed to H. pylori’s antibiotic resistance,
the 36–45 year old age group (46.67%), followed by the along with other factors such as membrane permeability
26–35 year old age group (39.53%), and then the age alterations, efflux systems, and biofilm formation [58].
group of ˃45 years. This can be explained by the nature of Our investigated H. pylori isolates were all resistant to at
this age; it is the age of working and so more contact with least three families of antibiotics. In addition, the high-
contaminated sources occurs. In our study, the youngest est resistance was seen against ampicillin, metronidazole,
age group (16–25 years) was less susceptible to H. pylori rifampicin, erythromycin, and amoxicillin, which are the
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 9 of 11
best choices for H. pylori treatment. This may be related 0.2, it means that the high-risk contamination source is
to the indiscriminate use of these antibiotics, which are the place where antibiotics are frequently used.
unfortunately frequently prescribed and in excess of rec-
ommended dosages. The antibiotics resistance mecha- Conclusions
nism can be explained by limiting drug uptake and The presence of H. pylori in fish is still unclear, despite
inactivation, modifying the drug target, or active drug its status as a major waterborne disease. To the best of
efflux [59]. In addition, there are other mechanisms such our knowledge, this work is precedent in assessing the
as mutational adaptations, acquisition of genetic material prevalence of H. pylori in fish, freshwater sources, and
or alteration of gene expression leading to resistance to fish-handlers. The use of the ureC gene as a genetic
almost all antibiotics [60]. marker plays a major role in identifying and confirming
All of the isolated strains were resistant to ampicillin the presence of H. pylori bacteria in our samples. In addi-
(100%); Ranjbar et al. [29] reported a somewhat lower tion, The creation of a phylogenetic tree revealed genetic
rate of resistance at 75%. Our H. pylori isolates exhibited relatedness among the isolates. This data supports the
a high resistance rate to metronidazole (95.24%). Abdoh hypothesis of a zoonotic route of H. pylori transmission.
et al. [61] and Metwally et al. [62] reported a resistance Therefore, there is a need to raise public awareness about
rate of 100%. Various rates of metronidazole resistance stopping the discharge of sewage into waterways to pre-
were obtained by several authors, including Ranjbar et al. vent water and fish pollution. Since our study identified a
[29] (62.5%), Brigitte et al. [63] (97.9%), Tang et al. [64] significant level of antibiotic resistance, increased efforts
(90.6%), Mégraud et al. [65] (58.6%), and Shrestha et al. from health officials are necessary to combat it. It is also
[66] (69%). The high resistance to this antibiotic may be crucial to implement health education programs and
attributed to its widespread use for many infectious dis- promote strict hygiene practices within households.
eases and its cheap price.
Abbreviations
Resistance of H. pylori isolates to rifampicin, erythro- H. pylori
Helicobacter pylori
mycin, and amoxicillin was reported in various studies. ureC urease C gene
Ranjbar et al. [29] recorded the same resistance rates glmM phosphoglucosamine mutase
CLSI Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute
against erythromycin and amoxicillin (62.5%). In the line MAR Multiple antibiotic resistance
with our high resistance level to rifambicin (88.10%),
Metwally et al. [62] detected a 90% resistance rate. In Acknowledgements
The Science, Technology, and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) and the
contrast, H. pylori strains recovered by Mégraud et al. Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB) have partnered to provide open access
[67] were highly susceptible to amoxicillin, with only a funding. Authors’ contributions to the research.
1.2% resistance rate being detected.
Authors’ contributions
Among our strains, the lowest resistance rate was The authors A.G.M. and H.M.A.M. conducted several activities in their study,
recorded for levofloxacin (21.43%), which aligns with its including conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology
recommended use in the treatment of H. pylori infection. development, software implementation, validation, visualization, original
draft authoring, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. The process of
Furthermore, several studies have reported zero resis- analysis and writing-reviewer/editing was conducted by H.H.A. which then
tance to levofloxacin [61, 63]. In contrast, Tang et al. [64], transitioned into the software development phase. The final version of the
Mégraud et al. [65], and Metwally et al. [62] reported manuscript was read and approved by all authors.
were detected by Shrestha et al. [66] (26%), while Brigitte Data Availability
et al. [63], Hofreuter et al. [68], and Mégraud et al. [67] Requests for materials should be addressed to A.G.M and H.M.A.M.
recorded lower rates of 13.75%, 10.9%, and 22.2%, respec- Accession numbers and [PERSISTENT WEB LINK]”.
OQ456179.
tively. In contrast, Abdoh et al. [61] identified high resis- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/OQ456179.1?report=genbank&log$
tance levels at 47% and [64] (44.4%), respectively. The =nucltop&blast_rank=2&RID=HD49290W013.
resistance to Clarithromycin in H. pylori may be attrib- OQ456180.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/OQ456180.1?report=genbank&log$
uted to its misuse in the treatment of various respira- =nucltop&blast_rank=1&RID=HD4G6TMH013.
tory infections. Furthermore, a high MAR index of up to OR144424.
1 was observed in our isolates, indicating multiple drug https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/OR144424.1?report=genbank&log$
=nucltop&blast_rank=1&RID=HD4X692S01N.
resistance. These findings were corroborated by Rotchell OR144425.
et al. [69], who reported that when the MAR is more than
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 10 of 11
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/OR144425.1?report=genbank&log$ 15. Jácome J, et al. Tilapia en Ecuador: paradoja entre la producción acuícola y
=nucltop&blast_rank=1&RID=HD4S86VZ016. la protección de la biodiversidad ecuatoriana. Revista peruana de biología.
OQ456181. 2019;26(4):543–50.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/OQ456181.1?report=genbank&log$ 16. Eltholth M, et al. Assessing the chemical and microbiological quality
=nucltop&blast_rank=2&RID=HD4G6TMH013. of farmed tilapia in Egyptian fresh fish markets. Global food Security.
OQ456182. 2018;17:14–20.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/OQ456182.1?report=genbank&log$ 17. Group WPPLW. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics:
=nucltop&blast_rank=1&RID=HD4MA8RJ013. the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Tuberculosis. Lancet
Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318–27.
18. Negash M, et al. Evaluation of SD BIOLINE H. Pylori Ag rapid test against
Declarations double ELISA with SD H. Pylori Ag ELISA and EZ-STEP H. Pylori Ag ELISA tests.
BMC Clin Pathol. 2018;18:1–6.
Ethics approval and consent to participate 19. Arauro Boira RH. / Helicobacter pylori. Global Water Pathogens Project. Part 3
The Bioethics Committee has approved the proposal entitled(Molecular specific excreted pathogens: environmental and epidemiology aspects. MI,
Characterization of Helicobacter pylori isolated from Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis UNESCO: Michigan State University, E. Lansing; 2017.
niloticus) and fish handlers) to meet requirements of the Faculty of veterinary 20. Savoldi A, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: a
medicine ,South Valley University research ethics, Qena, Egypt under approval systematic review and meta-analysis in World Health Organization regions.
number (VM/SVU/23(2)-28) were followed in conducting this protocol. The Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1372–82. e17.
study participants provided their informed consent. All procedures were 21. Kasahun GG, Demoz GT, Desta DM. Primary resistance pattern of Helicobacter
carried out in conformity with the applicable rules and regulations. The pylori to antibiotics in adult population: a systematic review. Infect drug Resist,
study was conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE (Animals in Research: 2020: p. 1567–73.
Reporting In Vivo Experiments) criteria [23]. 22. Wang D, et al. The antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori to five antibiot-
ics and influencing factors in an area of China with a high risk of gastric
Consent for publication cancer. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:1–10.
Not applicable. 23. Du Sert NP, et al. Reporting animal research: explanation and elaboration for
the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000411.
Competing interests 24. Sainsus N, et al. Liquid culture medium for the rapid cultivation of Heli-
The authors reported no conflicts of interest. cobacter pylori from biopsy specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis.
2008;27:1209–17.
Received: 25 September 2023 / Accepted: 15 November 2023 25. Al-Sulami A, Al-Edani T, Al-Abdula A. Culture method and PCR for the detection
of Helicobacter pylori in drinking water in Basrah Governorate Iraq Gastroenter-
ology research and practice, 2012.
26. Van Zwet A, et al. Sensitivity of culture compared with that of polymerase
chain reaction for detection of Helicobacter pylori from antral biopsy
samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31(7):1918–20.
References 27. Chèneby D, et al. 16S rDNA analysis for characterization of denitrify-
1. Gholami-Borujeni F, Rahimi H, Sajjadi SM. Detection of Helicobacter pylori ing bacteria isolated from three agricultural soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol.
genes (CagA and VacA) in municipal drinking water. Environ Health Eng Man- 2000;34(2):121–8.
age J. 2022;9(3):305–10. 28. Tamura K, et al. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0.
2. Atapoor S, Dehkordi FS, Rahimi E. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in various Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.
types of vegetables and salads. Jundishapur J Microbiol, 2014. 7(5). 29. Ranjbar R, et al. Helicobacter pylori isolated from Iranian drinking water: vacA,
3. Karkhah A, et al. Helicobacter pylori evasion strategies of the host innate cagA, iceA, oipA and babA2 genotype status and antimicrobial resistance
and adaptive immune responses to survive and develop Gastrointestinal properties. FEBS Open Bio. 2016;6(5):433–41.
Diseases. Microbiol Res. 2019;218:49–57. 30. Cockerill FR, et al. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance
4. Mladenova-Hristova I, Grekova O, Patel A. Zoonotic potential of Helicobacter standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-second informa-
Spp. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50(3):265–9. tional supplement; 2012.
5. Stefano K, et al. Helicobacter pylori, transmission routes and recurrence of 31. Wang Y-K, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection: current options
Infection: state of the art. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis. 2018;89(Suppl and developments. World J Gastroenterology: WJG. 2015;21(40):11221.
8):72. 32. Alba C, Blanco A, Alarcón T. Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Curr
6. Emara MH, Salama RI, Salem AA. Demographic, endoscopic and histopatho- Opin Infect Dis. 2017;30(5):489–97.
logic features among stool H. pylori positive and stool H. pylori negative 33. Essawi T et al. Determination of Helicobacter pylori virulence genes in gastric
patients with dyspepsia. Gastroenterol Res. 2017;10(5):305. biopsies by PCR International Scholarly Research Notices, 2013.
7. Salem E, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection among farmers and 34. Wongphutorn P, et al. Detection and genotyping of Helicobacter pylori in
non-farmers with dyspepsia. Egypt J Occup Med. 2019;43(2):229–44. saliva versus stool samples from asymptomatic individuals in Northeastern
8. Xu M-Y, et al. Association of anaemia with Helicobacter pylori Infection: a Thailand reveals intra-host tissue-specific H. pylori subtypes. BMC Microbiol.
retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13434. 2018;18(1):1–9.
9. Zhang YY, et al. True’ re-infection of Helicobacter pylori after successful eradi- 35. Pina-Pérez MC, et al. Helicobacter pylori detection in Shellfish: a real-time
cation–worldwide annual rates, risk factors and clinical implications. Aliment quantitative polymerase chain reaction approach. Foodborne Pathog Dis.
Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29(2):145–60. 2019;16(2):137–43.
10. Vale F, Vítor J. Transmission pathway of Helicobacter pylori: does food play a 36. Santiago P, Moreno Y, Ferrús MA. Identification of viable Helicobacter pylori in
role in rural and urban areas? Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;138(1–2):1–12. drinking water supplies by cultural and molecular techniques. Helicobacter.
11. Farhadkhani M, et al. Potential transmission sources of Helicobacter pylori 2015;20(4):252–9.
Infection: detection of H. Pylori in various environmental samples. J Environ 37. Twing KI, Kirchman DL, Campbell BJ. Temporal study of Helicobacter pylori
Health Sci Eng. 2019;17:129–34. presence in coastal freshwater, estuary and marine waters. Water Res.
12. Cortés-Sánchez A. Helicobacter pylori, food, fish and tilapia. Food Res. 2011;45(4):1897–905.
2021;5(2):18–30. 38. Ebaa E-S, Hossam E-S, Olama Z. Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in
13. Ampuero JMV, et al. Evaluación microbiológica De Pescados Y mariscos some Egyptian water systems and its incidence of transmission to individuals.
expendidos en mercados de la ciudad de Huánuco. Investigación Valdizana. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(2):203.
2018;12(2):75–82. 39. Vesga F-J, et al. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in drinking water treatment
14. Abdel-Moein KA, Saeed H, Samir A. Novel detection of Helicobacter pylori in plants in Bogotá, Colombia, using cultural and molecular techniques. Int J
fish: a possible public health concern. Acta Trop. 2015;152:141–4. Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(4):595–601.
Mubarak et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2023) 19:250 Page 11 of 11
40. Hooi JK, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: systematic 57. Gong L, El-Omar EM. Application of molecular techniques in Helicobacter
review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(2):420–9. pylori detection: limitations and improvements. Wiley Online Library; 2021. p.
41. Bravo D, et al. Helicobacter pylori in human health and Disease: mechanisms e12841.
for local gastric and systemic effects. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(28):3071. 58. Tshibangu-Kabamba E, Yamaoka Y. Helicobacter pylori Infection and
42. Mehesin SA, et al. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori Infection among chil- antibiotic resistance—from biology to clinical implications. Nat Reviews
dren (6–12 years) in Menoufia Governorate. Menoufia Med J. 2021;34(1):354. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(9):613–29.
43. Khoder G, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and its associated factors 59. Reygaert WC. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of
among healthy asymptomatic residents in the United Arab Emirates. Patho- bacteria. AIMS Microbiol. 2018;4(3):482.
gens. 2019;8(2):44. 60. Munita JM, Arias CA. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Virulence Mech
44. Shaaban SI, et al. An investigative study on the zoonotic potential of Helico- Bacterial Pathogens, 2016: p. 481–511.
bacter pylori. BMC Vet Res. 2023;19(1):16. 61. Abdoh Q, et al. Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics at the An-
45. Hassan MK et al. Frequency of Helicobacter pylori Infection by testing stool Najah National University Hospital: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet.
antigen in patients with functional dyspepsia. Gomal J Med Sci, 2013. 11(2). 2018;391:S32.
46. Almashhadany DA, Mayass SM. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Human in 62. Metwally M et al. Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Resistance in Egypt: A Single-
Dhamar governorate/Yemen. J Med Pharm Sci. 2018;2(1):18–1. Center Study Infection and Drug Resistance, 2022: p. 5905–5913.
47. Seid A, Demsiss W. Feco-prevalence and risk factors of Helicobacter pylori 63. Kouitcheu Mabeku LB, et al. Broad spectrum resistance in Helicobacter pylori
Infection among symptomatic patients at Dessie Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. isolated from gastric biopsies of patients with dyspepsia in Cameroon and
BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):1–9. efflux-mediated multiresistance detection in MDR isolates. BMC Infect Dis.
48. Liu JM, et al. Association between Helicobacter pylori Infection and mortality 2019;19:1–11.
risk in Prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy: a 64. Tang X, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori among a
real-world evidence study. Cancer Med. 2021;10(22):8162–71. Chinese tibetan population. Future Microbiol. 2020;15(14):1353–61.
49. Guaman JF et al. Detection of Helicobacter pylori from human biological 65. Mégraud F, et al. Survey of the antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori
samples (feces) by antigenic screening and culture Jundishapur Journal of in France in 2018 and evolution during the previous 5 years. Helicobacter.
Microbiology, 2018. 11(7). 2021;26(1):e12767.
50. Abu-Gharbia M, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Assiut Uni- 66. Shrestha AB, et al. Drug resistance patterns of commonly used antibiot-
versity Hospital and medical laboratories by using non-invasive tests. Egypt J ics for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection among south Asian
Med Microbiol. 2022;31(1):39–45. countries: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Trop Med Infect Disease.
51. Bogiel T, et al. Usefulness of molecular methods for Helicobacter pylori 2023;8(3):172.
Detection in Pediatric patients and their correlation with histopathological 67. Mégraud F, et al. Rates of antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori iso-
Sydney classification. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;24(1):179. lates from clinical trial patients across the US and Europe. Am J Gastroenterol.
52. Castro-Muñoz LJ, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori from the oral cavity 2023;118(2):269.
of Mexican asymptomatic children under 5 years of age through PCR. Arch 68. Hofreuter D, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in an eastern
Oral Biol. 2017;73:55–9. German region. Helicobacter. 2021;26(1):e12765.
53. Rasheed F, et al. Rate of active Helicobacter pylori Infection among symptom- 69. Davis R, Brown PD. Multiple antibiotic resistance index, fitness and virulence
atic patients of Pakistan. Malaysian J Pathol. 2017;39(1):69–72. potential in respiratory Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Jamaica. J Med Micro-
54. Zamani M, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the worldwide preva- biol. 2016;65(4):261–71.
lence of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Volume 47. Alimentary pharmacology
& therapeutics; 2018;868–76. 7.
55. Shah SC, Iyer PG, Moss SF. AGA clinical practice update on the management Publisher’s Note
of refractory Helicobacter pylori Infection: expert review. Gastroenterology. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
2021;160(5):1831–41. published maps and institutional affiliations.
56. Liu H, et al. Specific and sensitive detection of H. Pylori in biological
specimens by real-time RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. PLoS ONE.
2008;3(7):e2689.