0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views7 pages

Chapter 2

Chapter 2 discusses the development of research topics and the literature review process. It outlines how to choose a research topic, emphasizing relevance, competence, and the importance of identifying research gaps through literature reviews. The chapter also provides procedures for conducting literature reviews, including sourcing documents and synthesizing findings to enhance research objectives.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views7 pages

Chapter 2

Chapter 2 discusses the development of research topics and the literature review process. It outlines how to choose a research topic, emphasizing relevance, competence, and the importance of identifying research gaps through literature reviews. The chapter also provides procedures for conducting literature reviews, including sourcing documents and synthesizing findings to enhance research objectives.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Chapter 2: Developing research topic and literature review

Content

- Developing research topic


- Literature review

Discussion

- Research theme vs. research topic


+ Major-Theme-Topic
+ Technology – AI – AI on shoppe payment
- Managerial issues vs. research issues
+ research issues: provide information for managers to make decision
+ Managerial issues: conclusions

Example

1. Developing research topic

1.1. Sources of research topic

- From practical or theoretical perspectives

+ Eg: Waste (practical issues); Theoretical problem/ theoretical perspectives: How to define waste in of
public management, for example corruption is a kind of waste.

- From researchers' knowledge of phenomena/problems


- From suggestion of researchers/instructors

- From your advisor's orientation/suggestion and your choice

- For students, three important sources:

 Lecturers assign a topic


 Students choose a topic in a provided list
 Students independently propose a research topic and get approvals

1.2. Characteristics of research topic:

a. Relevance

- Meeting research standards and requirements

- Matching with research competency and resources

+ Choose research is suitable with your ability and competency

- Having theories as foundation

- Matching with research context

- Matching to your career development goals

b. Competence

- Interesting

- Can make specific research objectives and questions

- Can access research resources (data…)

- Can help develop research skills

- Can potentially provide new knowledge

Summary: A simple formular

- A good research topic = Content+ analytical unit/context+ scope

Ex: Government quality and provincial economic growth in Vietnam.

+ Poverty reduction (content) of DienBien Dong district (analytical unit), DienBien province

DienBien Dong, DienBien province (scope)

+ Enhancing firm competitiveness of ThienDuong company

+ Impacts of education on labor participation (content) of individuals (analytical unit) in Vietnam


(scope)

- Characteristics of a good research topic


+ General objective

+ Specific objectives/question

Eg: What is government quality and how we measure?

How government quality affect economic index

Choose a research topic that have following factors:

Want to increase revenue


+ Identify Material issues: How to increase
revenue
+ Managerial questions: Whether we should
increase sales
+ Research questions: Does sales encourage
consumers to buy more
2. Literature review

Example: C, E, M, O, O, S, I, N

Find 01 character to have meaning words

Literature review

ECONOMISM => Literature review

=> M: research gap => need to find out

Literature review is like forming a meaningful word:

+ So, you arrange the “character” in an order to form a “meaningful word”

+ Also like you play a puzzle

Remember, do not “List” the previous research!

2.1. How literature review can help you in research?

- Help uncover research gaps (something that hasn't been studied);


- Help propose research topic (from the shortcomings of previous research); => Đọc phần limitations
phần tác giả chưa giải quyết được và recommendation for research => to form idea.

- Help avoid monotonous repetition of studies;

- Help to formulate and refine research objectives and questions;

- Enhance the meaning for the selection of research topics;

- Help learn about research design for your research.

- Help develop the research framework;

- Discover the methods to solve the research question used in previous studies

=> The third last helps to design research

2.2. Common content to review research

- What is known in the research topic => What you have so far? => identifying a gap in the available
literature

- What concepts and theories have been applied?

- What research methods are used? => what kinds of data, research method are used..

- There are arguments/disagreements in the research issue => identifying your chosen methodology and
justify why this methodology is relevant

- What evidence is there in the research problem?

- Who are the main contributors in that field of research?

- Any further research suggestions related to the issue….

2.3. Procedures of literature review

Step 1: Determine the needed information

+ Based on research objectives, concepts, theories, etc. What, who? where? When? How?....

Step 2: Locate the sources of documents

+ Primary or secondary sources

Step 3: Conduct a document search

+ Online and offline: pay attention to online search features….

Step 4: Read, comment, and evaluate documents

+ Quick review (title, origin, author, summary); => focus on each title, origin of that paper, ranking

Endnote:

- Citation
- Reference
- Literature review

+ Overall assessment (reliability, suitability), document storage

Step 5: Synthesize and analyze documents

+ Terms, concepts, measures, theoretical arguments, methods, results, proposals, etc. related to
research

2.3. Procedures of literature review

2.4. Where to find relevant documents

- Magazine and newspapers

+ BusinessWeek, Forbes, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal…

- Peer-reviewed journals

+ American Economic Review, Journal of Political Economy, Review of Economic Studies, Journal of
Economic Literature, Journal of Management, Economic Business Review, Journal of Economics and
Development,…

- Databases
+ Web of science, ScienceDirect, Proquest, JSTOR, Google scholar…
- DO NOT review documents from unreliable sources (Wikipedia, thesis,…), unclear sources (eg:
www.wnexpress.vn)

Citation from
+ a website
+ Published books (evaluate reputation of books)
2.5. Write a literature review report

- Possible structures for a literature review

◦Chronological order (happen over time): relevant for a particular topic has changed over time => from
the past to now (nghiên cứu trên trật tự thời gian)

◦Schools of thought: relevant for a topic is controversial and there are clearly defined schools of thought
(Phân loại thành các nhóm), thiên hơn về lý thuyết

◦Thematic logic: relevant for several aspects or ‘themes’ relevant to the topic

Đề: Government quality and economic growth

Thematic logic : EQ => GQ => Relationship EQ & EG

- Key elements of a good literature review


+ critical, comprehensive (covers all content needed) and scholarly (hàn lâm, học thuật)
- Magazine and newspapers
2.6. Misunderstanding about research review (try to avoid)

+ Literature review is an independent section of a research report/article

- So, you can say whatever you find in the literature review

+ Literature review is to list out all the previous related research and results

- So, you cannot compare, synthesize or criticize=> difficult to find the knowledge gap
- There can be “millions” of research related to the issue => readers cannot read them all

+ There is no criticism

+ Quality of literature review is about the number of the reviewed research

- What more important is what you get from the literature review, what’s your research’s
contribution

Khi viết literature review cần tránh Sử dụng nguồn tài liệu không đáng tin + liệt kê

You might also like