SSESMP Cold Storage Tikapur
SSESMP Cold Storage Tikapur
FOR
Construction of Cold Storage Facility
Tikapur, Kailali
January, 2024
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Background of the Cold Storage Project....................................................................................... 5
1.2 Objectives of SSESMP ................................................................................................................. 7
2 Particulars of the proposal..................................................................................................................... 7
2.1 Project Area .................................................................................................................................. 7
2.2 Objectives of the project ............................................................................................................... 8
2.3 Relevance of the project................................................................................................................ 8
2.4 Salient features of the project........................................................................................................ 9
2.5 Major project activities ............................................................................................................... 10
2.5.1 Construction phase .............................................................................................................. 10
2.5.2 Operational Stage ................................................................................................................ 10
2.6 Human resource requirement ...................................................................................................... 11
2.6.1 Human resources requirement during construction ............................................................ 11
2.6.2 Human resources requirement during operation ................................................................. 11
3 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 11
4 Alternatives Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 12
5 Environmental and Social Setting ....................................................................................................... 15
6 Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigation ............................................................................. 15
6.1 Beneficial Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 16
6.1.1 Construction Phase.............................................................................................................. 16
6.1.2 Operation Phase .................................................................................................................. 16
6.2 Adverse Impacts.......................................................................................................................... 16
6.2.1 Construction Phase.............................................................................................................. 16
6.2.2 Operation phase................................................................................................................... 19
7 Site-Specific Environmental and Social Management Plan................................................................ 22
8 Conclusion: ......................................................................................................................................... 28
List of Figures
Figure 2.1: Location of the Cold Storage Construction Site ......................................................................... 8
Figure 5.1: Proposed Site for Cold Storage Facility ................................................................................... 15
List of Tables
Table 2.1: Salient Features ............................................................................................................................ 9
Table 4.1: Comparison of alterative construction sites ............................................................................... 12
Table 4.2: Comparison of Ammonia with Freons as coolant...................................................................... 13
Table 7.7.1: Site-Specific Environmental and Social Management Plan ................................................... 22
1 Introduction
With financing from the World Bank, the Government of Nepal (GoN) has been supporting
modernization of Rani Jamara Kulariya Irrigation System (RJKIS). Once complete, the scheme
will provide reliable irrigation water to approximately 14,300 ha of land. The implementing
agency is the Department of Water Resources and Irrigation (DoWRI) with agricultural activities
being implemented through the Department of Agriculture through Agriculture Implementation
Coordination Unit, (ACIU) in Tikapur.
The RJK Scheme Phase 2 is currently in its fourth year of implementation. The Phase-II program
primarily aims at rehabilitation, extension and construction of canals and structures below the
secondary level to take the water to the command area with the ACIU providing location specific
demand-based extension and outreach services for optimal use of water and increase agricultural
productivity. With increase in the command area and reliable year-round supply of irrigation
water, combined with better water management practices supported by the ACIU, the command
area will see sharp increase cropping intensity and changes in cropping pattern to cultivate high
value cash crops and vegetables such as cabbage, cauliflower, bitter gourd, tomato, cucumber,
eggplant, potato and fruit (banana) farming. The increased agricultural production is expected to
contribute to increased income of the farmers in the command area of the RJKIS.
The main agricultural products which need storage around the project area are fruits and
vegetables. Due to various reasons, farmers are not being able to preserve the quality of
agricultural commodities all-round the year. Most fruits and vegetables have a very limited life
after harvest if held at normal harvesting temperatures. Postharvest cooling rapidly removes field
heat, allowing longer storage periods. Proper postharvest cooling can:
Reduce respiratory activity and degradation by enzymes;
Reduce internal water loss and wilting;
Slow or inhibit the growth of decay-producing microorganisms;
Reduce the production of the natural ripening agent, ethylene.
In addition to helping maintain quality, postharvest cooling also provides marketing flexibility
by allowing the grower to sell produce at the most appropriate time. Having cooling and storage
facilities makes it unnecessary to market the produce immediately after harvest. This can be an
advantage to growers who supply restaurants and grocery stores or to small growers who want to
assemble truckload lots for shipment. Postharvest cooling is essential to delivering produce of
the highest possible quality to the consumer.
Cold storage can be combined with storage in an environment with added carbon dioxide, sulfur
dioxide, etc. according to the nature of product to be preserved. The cold storage of
dried/dehydrated vegetables in order to maintain vitamin C, storage temperature can be varied
with storage time and can be at 0°-10°C for a storage time of more than one year, with a relative
humidity of 80-95 %.
In this scenario, the Agriculture Component Implementation Unit (ACIU) has planned to support
the proposed cold storage project to commercialise agriculture and create jobs and empower the
local agricultural groups, co-operatives, and private entrepreneurs. The potential customers are
growers, traders and consumers of the project command area. The integration of environmental
conservation with development endeavours is reinforced by the enforcement of the Environment
Protection Act 2019 (EPA) and Environmental Protection Rules, 2020 (EPR). The EPR obliges
the proponent to follow the legal processes and get environmental clearance from the competent
authorities before the implementation of the project requiring BES, IEE or EIA 1. The built-up
area for the proposed Cold-Storage facility is 3,528 square feet (i.e., 327.8 m2) and the capacity
is 1000 metric tonnes. For the construction of buildings with built-up areas or floor areas of less
than 3000 m2, no environmental clearance (BES, IEE or EIA) is required according to EPR 2020,
of the Government of Nepal (GoN) 2. The land where the proposed CS facility is to be built
belongs to the Town Development Committee of Tikapur Municipality. As requested by the
1
BES: Brief Environmental Study; IEE: Initial Environmental Examination; EIA: Environmental Impact
Assessment
2
A BES would be required if the built-up or floor area of 3000 to 5000 m2.
RJKIP on the letter dated 2076/10/21, the Water User Association-Main Committee has been
provided with use rights for this 2,710 m2 plot of land at ward number 1 by a board meeting of
the TTDC on December 13, 2020 for the construction of the Cold Storage facility with a joint
investment from the ACIU of RJKIP (World Bank Fund) and the Water User Association
(WUA) based on the decision of the Municipal Board on 2077/08/28 (Annex 5).
To ensure the implementation of environmental and social safeguards during the implementation
of the project, this Site-Specific Environmental and Social Management Plan (SSESMP) has
been prepared.
The construction of cold store is closely related with the food security. In Nepal, different
studies have shown the postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables are 20-50%. Various studies
have estimated postharvest losses from 20 to 30% for fresh fruits and vegetables and could
exceed 50% under adverse conditions. Gautam and Bhattarai (2012) estimated losses vary
between 20 and 30% for apple, between 15 and 20% for citrus, between 10 and 15% for
tomatoes 20-25 % for potatoes and between 10 and 15% for cauliflower. The project command
area also faces similar problems of postharvest losses due to lack of proper storage facilities for
the agricultural commodities like potato, tomato and other vegetables from decaying and
alleviate food security problems in the command area, construction of cold storage facility is
necessary.
Item Description
Project Name Cold storage
Operator Water User Association of Rani Jamara Kulariya
Irrigation System
Location Tikapur Municipality-1, Kailali
Total land area of the project 2,710 square meters
Land Owner Tikapur Town Development Committee
Building area Total: 3,528 square feet (84ft*42 ft)
Total capacity of facility 1000 metric tonnes
Number of floors 5
Product Fruits and vegetables
Total Project Cost NRs. 74,787,818.69 (with. VAT)
Technology used
Materials and their quantity for
construction
Resources and quantity used/ consumed
during operation
Energy requirement and source
Plan, C-section, L-section, Schematic, 3-
D figure/ perspective view of the facility
with dimensions
Item Description
Investment 75% share of the World Bank and 25% share of
Water User Associations
Commodities transported
3 Methodology
The study team conducted observation of environmental and social conditions around the
proposed site, through structured checklist to determine the potential area of concern/impact in
the proposed location. Besides, following approaches were used to prepare the SSESMP.
4 Alternatives Analysis
Alternative Sites:
Two sites were studied for the establishment of cold storage facility. The site proposed initially
was in the main city area just near the Jamara River leaving a chance of water pollution due to
the waste generated from cold storage operations. The currently proposed construction site is out
of the city center. The site is not located in any forest area, rivers, ponds, etc. The rationale for
the selection of the current site for cold storage facility is presented in the form of comparison in
Table 4.1
Ammonia and Freon (chlorofluorocarbons or CFCs) are both commonly used as refrigerants in
cooling systems. However, there are several advantages of ammonia over Freon as a refrigerant.
S. N. Parameter Explanation
Efficiency Ammonia has a higher coefficient of performance (COP) than
1. Freon, which means that it can absorb more heat per unit of energy
input. This makes ammonia a more efficient refrigerant
Cost- Ammonia is less expensive than Freon and other synthetic
2. effectiveness refrigerants, which makes it a cost-effective option for large-scale
refrigeration applications. Ammonia has a higher coefficient of
S. N. Parameter Explanation
performance (COP) than Freon, which means it requires less energy
to achieve the same cooling effect. This makes it more energy-
efficient and cost-effective in the long run.
Environmental Ammonia is a natural refrigerant that does not contribute to ozone
3. impact depletion or global warming. In contrast, Freon and other CFCs
have been found to have a significant impact on the environment.
Safety While ammonia is a toxic gas, it has a distinctive odour that makes
it easy to detect if there is a leak. Freon, on the other hand, is
4.
odourless and can lead to asphyxiation if leaked into a confined
space
Availability Ammonia is widely available and relatively inexpensive compared
5. and cost to Freon, making it a more accessible option for smaller businesses
or industries
The land allocated for the facility is 2,710 square meters of fallow land with the right of use
provided by the Town Development Committee of Tikapur Municipality. There are no schools,
health posts or any socio-culturally sensitive entities.
The beneficial and adverse environmental and social issues identified for both construction and
operation phase are based on the following:
3
Geotechnical Investigation Report for the Proposed Cold Storage Site, 2077
Technical review of the design, construction and operation modalities of the project in the
given physical, and socio-economic and cultural setting incorporating expert’s knowledge
on given situation for the identification of the potential issues
Stakeholders’ concerns and issues (issues raised by the local people during scoping
meeting)
Experience gained from other cold storage of similar nature
Mitigation: The waste generated will be segregated into degradable and non-degradable.
Degradable waste will be managed in a compost pit, while non-degradable waste will be
sent to the municipal waste management system of Tikapur municipality.
7 Site-Specific Environmental and Social Management Plan
Table 7.7.1: Site-Specific Environmental and Social Management Plan
Tentative
S Impact Mitigation measures for Supervise
Location Responsibility management Remarks
N identification adverse impacts d by
cost
A Physical Environment (Construction phase)
Since the land is flat and the
prefab structure does not need
deeper foundation, the generated
spoil will be very low.
Hazard due to construction ACIU/ Cost for fencing
1 There is space available within Contractor 15,0000.00
spoil disposal site WUAs by GI plane sheet.
the project area for spoil disposal.
A separate spoil disposal yard
within the project area will be
located with proper fencing.
The Recyclable wastes will be
sent to scrap dealers; the organic Cost for dust bins
Solid Waste
construction waste will be composted in the ACIU/WU and compost pit,
2 Management Contractor 100,000.00
site compost pit and the manure thus As lime, decomposer
Issues
obtained will be distributed to the etc.
locals.
A separate yard inside the
Hazard due to construction site will be
stockpiling of construction designated for stockpiling of ACIU/WU Plastic mat for
3 Contractor 100,000.00
construction site construction materials. Sealing of As surface coverage.
materials the area so that surface water
pollution does not occur.
Establishment Construction camps and labor
and operation of camps will not be established
Labor camps construction outside project area. Camps will ACIU/WU
4 Contractor 700,000.00
and site be provided with first aid facility As
Construction and pit latrine; soak pit will be
Camps provided for water and solid
Tentative
S Impact Mitigation measures for Supervise
Location Responsibility management Remarks
N identification adverse impacts d by
cost
waste management. Labor camp
management guidelines will be
followed by workers and
representatives of contractors for
effective implementation.
Within
Possible All used lubricants and oil will be
project area
hazards due to collected and recycled or Cost for plastic
as well as ACIU/WU
5 toxic and disposed off site in appropriate Contractor 150,000.00 bags and
during As
combustible manner so as to avoid any transportation.
transportatio
material environmental degradation
n
The construction wastewater will Contractor ACIU/WU
be released only after pre- As
treatment. The waste generated in
the camp will be segregated into
Water and land degradable and non-degradable. Should be
construction
6 pollution Degradable waste will be Embedded in
site
managed in a compost pit, while BoQ
non-degradable waste will be
sent to the municipal waste
management system of Tikapur
municipality.
The contractor will cover bare Contractor ACIU/WU Should be
soil, and use gravel or mulch As Embedded in
to contain fine soil particles BoQ
Within
project area use a water truck or temporary
Dust/ air
as well as irrigation to keep haul roads
7 pollution: during damp. Lower travel speeds
transportatio shall be maintained on
n unpaved areas and
earthmoving tasks shall be
restricted during extremely
Tentative
S Impact Mitigation measures for Supervise
Location Responsibility management Remarks
N identification adverse impacts d by
cost
windy conditions. The
equipment shall be maintained
to reduce the gaseous
emissions
Within The construction activities and Contractor ACIU/WU Should be
project area operation of equipment will be As Embedded in
Noise pollution: as well as carried out below the TWA BoQ
8
during sound level of 85 dBA to 90
transportatio dBA and noise pollution will
n not be an issue.
B. Physical Environment (Operation Phase)
The office room will be well
ventilated in order to control foul
smell; leaking areas will be
Air pollution frequently checked and Regular
controlled. Contractor/WU
1 and odour ACIU 0.00 supervision no
Cold Storage Operation and As
nuisance cost involved.
Management Guidline (शित
भण्डार संचालन तथा व्यवस्थापन
कार्यशवशि, २०७९)
The machinery is 54KW which
cost is built in
Impact due to can be easily operated by existing
Entire design and
2 Energy electricity supply but a WUAs ACIU 0.00
Project Area estimate of the
Consumption transformer and generator will be
cold storage.
used.
Measures suggested in 6.2.2
Project site (Hazards due to ammonia
Ammonia and release) Cold Storage Training for
3 WUAs ACIU 300,000.00
Hazard adjoining operator.
Operation and Management
areas
Guidline (शित भण्डार संचालन
Tentative
S Impact Mitigation measures for Supervise
Location Responsibility management Remarks
N identification adverse impacts d by
cost
तथा व्यवस्थापन कार्यशवशि, २०७९)
Impact due to
Nearby The impact will be prevented by
ammonia Already
agricultural applying the precautions
1 leakage on WUAs ACIU 0.00 mentioned in
lands of mentioned 6.2.2 (hazard due to
nearby section B.3.
project area ammonia release)
agricultural land
All other potential impacts are insignificant in this project. The construction of 1000 metric ton
capacity cold storage has already inspired local farmers and businesses even during preparatory
stage. ACIU will implement, supervise and monitor the implementation of proposed Site-
Specific Environmental and Social management plan. It is envisaged that the proposed project
will be a milestone in promoting the agricultural production and their marketing in project
command area.
References
Gautam D. M. and Bhattarai (2012). Postharvest horticulture.Bhawani Printers.Chabahil
Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ministry of Forests and Environment, 1999. Environmental Protection Act, 1997 and
Environment Protection Rules, 1999. (Amendment, 1999)
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (2014). Agriculture Development Strategies
2014.
Ministry of Health (2017). Nepal Demographic and Health Survey, 2016.
Annexes
Annex 1. Minute of meeting held on January 24, 2021 for environmental and social screening of
the proposed project.
Annex 2. Questionnaire for environmental screening of the proposed project.
Annex 3. Questionnaire for the social screening of the proposed project.
\
Annex 4. Map of the proposed project site.
Annex 6. Layout and design of the proposed project from detailed project report.
Annex 5: Letter for Land Use Rights
Related photographs
Meeting held on January 24, 2021 for environmental and social screening