FREEDOM OF PRESS – STUDY NOTES
1. Constitutional Provision
      Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees Freedom of Speech and
       Expression.
      Though Freedom of the Press is not explicitly mentioned, it is implicitly included
       under this Article.
2. Importance of Freedom of Press
      Acts as a watchdog in a democracy.
      Ensures transparency, accountability, and informed citizenry.
      A free press is essential for the functioning of a democratic society.
3. Reasonable Restrictions – Article 19(2)
Freedom of the press is not absolute. It is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest
of:
      Sovereignty and integrity of India
      Security of the State
      Public order
      Decency or morality
      Contempt of court
      Defamation
      Incitement to an offence
4. Landmark Case Laws
a. Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950)
      Facts: Ban on journal “Cross Roads” in Madras.
      Held: Freedom of speech and press is at the foundation of democratic society.
      Significance: First case recognizing freedom of press as part of Article 19(1)(a).
b. Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi (1950)
      Facts: Pre-censorship imposed on a newspaper “Organiser”.
      Held: Pre-censorship violates Article 19(1)(a).
      Significance: Censorship before publication is unconstitutional.
c. Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India (1973)
      Facts: Challenge to newsprint policy restricting newspaper size.
      Held: Government cannot restrict freedom of press under the guise of regulating
       newsprint.
      Significance: Freedom of press includes right to circulation and choice of content.
d. Indian Express Newspapers v. Union of India (1985)
      Held: Freedom of press includes freedom from excessive taxation.
      Significance: Economic policies that curtail press freedom violate Article 19(1)(a).
e. Express Newspapers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (1958)
      Held: Government action must not be used to stifle freedom of the press.
      Significance: Eviction orders or policies should not indirectly suppress press freedom.
f. Prabha Dutt v. Union of India (1982)
      Held: Journalists have the right to interview prisoners, subject to reasonable
       restrictions.
      Significance: Press has the right to information, balanced with state interests.
g. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994)
      Facts: Publication of autobiography of a convict.
      Held: Right to publish life story without prior consent, if based on public records.
      Significance: Recognized right to privacy vs freedom of press.
5. Modern Context
      Digital media and social media platforms are also covered under freedom of
       expression.
      Issues of fake news, misinformation, surveillance, and content regulation are
       debated.
6. Conclusion
      Freedom of press is a cornerstone of democracy.
      It must be preserved while balancing with public interest and national security.