WAX AND DUST MOP: A CLEANING TOOL THAT APPLIES FLOOR WAX WITH A

DETACHABLE DUSTER

BUAL, ANJELIN A.
DANDA, BENEDICT SEAN L.
ETRONE, GEAN CARL B.
GORRO, ANGEL MAE T.
MARAGAÑAS, ROXANNE G.
MARTIN, ANTONETTE JANE B.
PANES, LEXAN GABRIEL S.

MARCH 2025
 Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

Floor wax is one of the foundation in maintaining a clean and shiny floor however,
harmful chemicals present in the Floor wax can cause irritations or allergic reactions, A study by
West (2019) many harmful chemicals exist within the wax’s ingredients, one of this chemical is
Xylene, according to CDC (2014) Xylene also known as Xylol is a chemical compound that can
cause skin, eyes, nose and even throat irritation as well as neurological problems like dizziness,
drowsiness, and confusion.

According Betco (2019) A floor wax applicator can address several problems related to floor
maintenance and aesthetic appeal. In applying the floor wax manually poor leveling, spreading, or
wetting of floor finish. According to the study of Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
conducted last 2019, the floor wax that are popularly known have side effects that are bad for the
health. It also has a pungent odor that irritates most people. Studies show that constant exposure to
the inhalation of the odor of cleaning products, especially floor wax.

Moreover, faster and more effective application is made possible by the applicator's
distinctive shape. Compared to conventional mops, its enormous surface area allows it to cover a
larger area of floor with each pass, thus cutting down on time and labor. The applicator is a time-
saving tool for busy people and families because it is especially useful for larger areas. In addition to
its usefulness, the mop floor wax applicator produces an excellent visual result.

This new product called Wax and Dust Mop represents a innovative change in applying floor
wax which aims to reduce direct contact and slouching providing conveniency with innovative
features such as a floor wax storage mechanism and a push-pull plunger like mechanism.

Aims of the Study

This study is aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of using a mop that is able to apply floor
wax than what an ordinary mop can do, making applying floor wax more efficient less time
consuming and more accurate when it comes to doing house chores at home or even at school.

1
The following research questions are intended to be addressed by this study:

1.) Determine the time do students save when using the Wax and Dust Mop compared to applying
manually

2.) Is there a significance in the relationship between the students cleaning rate when using the Wax
and Dust Mop and Manual Application?

Significance of the Study

This study will be beneficial to the students and various groups, including homeowners,
landlords or property managers, students, small business owners, and people with allergies to floor
wax. This mop streamlines floor care, making it accessible, time-saving, and cost-effective for
various user groups while catering to specific needs like convenience and allergy sensitivity.

1. Students - often have busy schedules, and the Wax and Dust Mop simplifies floor waxing by
combining application and mopping in one tool. This makes the process quick and efficient.
2. Homeowners - often need to maintain clean and shiny floors to enhance the aesthetic of their
living spaces. The Wax and Dust Mop simplifies waxing tasks, ensuring even application
without professional help.
3. Landlords or Property Managers - Property managers who maintain rental units or
commercial spaces can use the Wax and Dust Mop to prepare floors quickly before showings
or tenant turnover.
4. Small Business Owners - Businesses with high foot traffic, like cafes or boutiques, require
clean and well-maintained floors. The Wax and Dust Mop allows for quick touch-ups, saving
money on professional services.
5. Peoples with allergies to floor wax - Hands-Free Application: The Wax and Dust Mop
likely minimizes direct contact with floor wax, reducing exposure to allergens. Allergic
reactions can occur from skin contact or inhalation of fumes, so an application tool that keeps
the user distanced from the product is helpful.

2
 Scope and Delimitations

This study focuses on how to put floor wax easily without having a skin contact that may
cause skin irritations within the body of a wax user. The research’s aim is to successfully develop a
mop product that is use for applying floor wax easily and efficiently without consuming a lot of time.
The study is conducted in school (Kabasalan Science and Technology High School) where selected
teachers and students are involved as it is specifically examining the difference between using a mop
product and using traditional hand application methods of applying floor wax. This study does not
cover additional cleaning and upkeep items, such as floor buffers and automated tidier. It excludes
floors made of uncommon materials like marble or concrete

Conceptual Framework

MODERATING VARIABLE
• Different types of floorings

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE DEPENDENT VARIABLE

• Floor wax applicator (mop) • Cleanliness of the floor
• Detachable duster • The efficiency in applying

MEDIATING VARIABLE
• Wax applicator
• How wide the area

CONTROL VARIABLE
•Amount of wax
•Floor condition

3
Definition of Terms

CONCEPTUAL

1. Applicator - a device used for inserting something or for applying a substance to a surface

2. Detachable - Capable of being separated or removed from a larger item or structure

3. Dust - Fine, dry particles of matter that accumulate on surfaces, typically composed of dirt,
pollen, and other small debris.

4. Duster - cleaning tool designed to remove dust from surfaces, often with a handle and a head
made from feathers, cloth, or synthetic materials.

5. Floor Wax - A protective coating or polish, often made from natural or synthetic waxes, applied
to floor surfaces to enhance their appearance and protect them from dirt, stains, and wear.

6. Mop - A cleaning tool consisting of a head, typically made of cloth, sponge, or synthetic fibers,
used for cleaning floors by applying and spreading liquid cleaner or water.

7. Tool - An instrument or device used to perform a specific task, typically to make work easier or
more efficient

4
 CHAPTER 2

REVIEW RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

According to Unfallversicherung (2019), the building cleaning sector constitutes one of the
largest groups by the BG BAU, and musculoskeletal diseases and complaints are widespread among
the cleaning personnel. One means of reducing the physical workloads arising during cleaning work
is by the use of cleaning equipment of enhanced ergonomic design. Against this background, the BG
BAU commissioned a study of a number of mop handles. The study was to compare these handles
with regard to their effect/impact upon body postures and movements. The results were to support
the BG BAU in formulating recommendations for cleaning equipment, and possibly to reveal
information relevant to further development of such equipment. The information obtained can be
used during the assessment of tasks that impose a load upon the joints, and also as a basis for the
formulation of recommendations for suitable prevention measures.

The aim of this study was to investigate effects of mop handle height on electromyographic
(EMG) activities of the shoulder muscles and perceived exertion for the shoulder area during floor
mopping using a figure eight method. An experimental study with 13 cleaners was conducted using
surface EMG and category ratio (CR-10) scale. EMG activity was recorded unilaterally from the
upper trapezius, infraspinatus, anterior and middle deltoid muscles. Each subject performed four
trials of mopping and each trial consisted of using a different mop handle height (mop adjustment at
the level of shoulder, chin, nose and eye) in randomized order. EMG data were normalized to a
percentage of maximal voluntary contraction (%MVC). The muscle activities were assessed by
estimating the 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles of the amplitude probability distribution function
(APDF) of the EMG signals and analyzed by linear mixed model analysis. Results showed that
shoulder muscle activity was significantly lower when the mop handle height was adjusted to
shoulder level or chin level as compared to eye level. These findings were supported by subjective
ratings of exertion. It seems that mop handle height adjustment between shoulder and chin level may
be recommended as a basis for figure eight mopping. Wallius et al., (2015).

It is impossible to avoid the applicator's adaptability. Depending on the type of floor

and desired finish, it can be customized using a range of waxes. The applicator gives you the
freedom to get the look you choose, whether that's a subtle matte finish or a high-gloss sheen. The
mop floor wax applicator is the obvious choice for attaining genuinely outstanding floor care, even
though conventional mops could be useful in some cleaning situations. It is an essential tool for

5
everyone looking for a clean, safe, and attractive floor because of its simplicity of use, effectiveness,
and excellent results. Friar et al., (1954)

Fast forward to 1893, the mop as we know it today was patented by Thomas W. Steward, an
African-American inventor, patented an improvement on Howe’s mop. Stewart’s design featured a
clamp to keep the mop head securely attached to the handle, further improving functionality and
making it easier to change mop heads as needed. Stewart., (2008). Mope Invention and It’s Legacy.
Steward’s revolutionary clamping device allowed users to wring water out of the mop by leveraging
a lever, significantly simplifying the floor cleaning process. Shen et al., (2024)

Wax and dust mop is made to avoid the dirt coming that might contact with the skin that can
cause skin irritation and to prevent back pain when squatting every time you apply floor wax. This
product is used to apply the floor wax easily and to make it less hassle and it also has an attachable
duster, our product has an ability to supply floor wax that can be applied in the difficult areas. No
one can tell us how often we should clean your floors, or how much time we should spend on the job.
It lessens the time consumed when applying floor wax. Scholar., (1972).

6
 CHAPTER 3

METHODS

3.1 THE STUDY SITE

This research was conducted in Kabasalan Science and Technology High School (KSTHS)
located at Barangay Fl. Peña Kabasalan in the province of Zamboanga Sibugay. The Experiment was
done in one of the classrooms which meets the needed requirements to be done. three areas is
measured to have a fix distance, which is then divided into two portions.

Figure 1. The Study Site

7° 47' 48.49" N, 122° 45' 45.78" E

3.2 RESEARCH SAMPLE

Wax and Dust Mop research sample consist of a barell, Plunger and a special textile found
beneath the mop head, The Researchers will conduct the following steps that is needed to evaluate
the products efficiency and effectiveness of the product. By filling the syringe with floor wax. The
evaluation will be performed under the controlled conditions which is under a given distance. This is
done to evaluate the Mop’s efficiency or effectiveness in terms of applying and spreading floor wax.

3.3 RESEARCH DESIGN

This study was conducted under matched-pair design is a type of research design that
involves repeatedly measuring a 2 groups behavior by measuring the time and efficiency and to
determine the relationship between the dependent variable and independent variable, such as the

7
manual way applying of floor wax and by using the benefit and advantage of using Wax and Dust
Mop.

Moreover, the experimental layout is composed of around twenty to thirty participants from
various demographics, including Teachers and Students, to fully put the product into the test. The
product is then being compared to a manual of applying with the same size of room, the experiment
begins by putting two cleaners to do the work, one is using The Special Mop and the other one is the
normal way of applying floor wax.

3.4 RESEARCH PROCEDURE

3.4.1 PREPARATION OF THE WAX AND DUST MOP APPLYING FLOORWAX

8
 The mop handle is made of PVC pipe with a storage capacity of six (6) to seven (7) ounces, a
barrel with a length of (one) 1 foot, a plunger, and a O-string for the plunger’s head.

Figure 1. Dimensions of the Mop

9
3.4.2. ASSEMBLING PROCESS OF THE WAX AND DUST MOP

The researchers first attached the mop handle to the mop head. In assembling the
mop, the researchers used the following: one (1) barrel with a length of 8 inches one (1) plunger, and
one (1) O-ring. The barrel will be attached to the mop's head as well as the plunger. After
assembling, it is necessary to make sure that all the parts and fittings ae installed correctly. Lastly, in
placing the floor wax to the barrel of the mop, remove the plunger, then after squeezing the floor wax
on the barrel of the mop, install the plunger back. For the Treatment, The Mop's extension is made of
a PVC pipe with a measurement of 20 inches a plunger will be installed, and an O-ring for the seal to
avoid leaking, the barrel will be attached to the mop's head as well as the plunger. After assembling,
it is necessary to make sure that all the parts and fittings are installed correctly.

3.5 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

To aid the analysis and interpretation of the data gathering, statistics were used such as the
number of participants, and time were used to describe the variables in this study. Wax and Dust
Mop can focus on their effectiveness in maintaining indoor air quality and cleaning efficiency. 5
participants, first (1st) one is equipped with the “Wax and Dust Mop”, second (2 nd) one is tasked to
apply floor wax in a manual procedure, were placed on the same room with the same dimension, this
is than measured on both participants time that they finished applying their tasked area. A standard
7m x 9m senior high classrooms is used in this experiment, 3 different areas were tested and it's
divided into 3 parts, 3m x 5m with a 10-minute time window, 5m x 7m with a 20-minute window,
and 7m x 9m with a 30-minute time window, to compare the time and efficiency of the participants.

10
 CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the data collected and interpretations of the data. The chapter proceeds
by answering and analyzing each data collected from the Participants.

Statement of the Problem 1: Determine the time do students save when using the Wax and Dust
Mop compared to applying manually?

Table 1.1: The Time It Took the Participants to Apply Floor Wax Using Wax and Dust Mop

Participant no. Test site 1 Test site 2 Test site 3 Average

Participant 1 1.38 Minutes(s) 1.54 Minute(s) 2.21 Minute(s) 1.71
Participant 2 1.23 Minutes(s) 1.54 Minute(s) 2.18 Minutes(s) 1.65
Participant 3 1.13 Minute(s) 1.54 Minute(s) 2.13 Minute(s) 1.60
Participant 4 1.14 1.51 2.16 Minutes(s) 1.60
Minutes(s) Minutes(s)
Participant 5 1.16 Minute(s) 1.53 Minute(s) 2.13 Minute(s) 1.60

Finding the Mean

Sum of Terms / Number of Terms

1.38 + 1.54 + 2.21 = 5.13 = 5.13 / 3 = 1.71

1.23 + 1.54 + 2.18 = 4.95 = 4.95 / 3 = 1.65

1.13 + 1.54 + 2.13 = 4.80 = 4.80 / 3 = 1.60

1.14 + 1.51 + 2.16 = 4.81 = 4.81 / 3 = 1.60

1.16 + 1.53 + 2.13 = 4.82 = 4.82 / 3 = 1.60

The Table 1.1 presented the time and remarks for how fast the 5 participants applied
Floor wax on the 3 different test sites using “Wax and Dust Mop” in minutes.

11
Table 1.2: The Time It Took the Participants to Apply Floor Wax Manually

Participant no. Test site 1 Test site 2 Test site 3 Average

Participant 1 2.40 Minutes(s) 3.01 Minute(s) 3.58 Minute(s) 2.99
Participant 2 2.38 Minutes(s) 2.51 Minute(s) 4.02 Minutes(s) 2.97
Participant 3 2.32 Minutes(s) 2.44 Minute(s) 3.56 Minute(s) 2.77
Participant 4 2.34 Minute(s) 2.33 Minute(s) 3.59 Minute(s) 2.72
Participant 5 2.33 Minute(s) 2.47 Minute(s) 3.55 Minute(s) 2.78

Finding the Mean

Sum of Terms / Number of Terms

2.40 + 3.01 + 3.58 = 8.99 = 8.99 / 3 = 2.99

2.38 + 2.51 + 4.02 = 8,91 = 8,91 / 3 = 2.97

2.32 + 2.44 + 3.56 = 8.32 = 8.32 / 3 = 2.77

2.34 + 2.33 + 3.59 = 8.17 = 8.17 / 3 = 2.72

2.33 + 2.47 + 3.55 = 8.35 = 8.35 / 3 = 2.78

The Table 1.2 presented the time and remarks for how fast the 5 participants applied Floor
wax on the 3 different test sites using “Manually” in minutes.

12
Statement of the Problem 2: Is there a significant relationship between the students cleaning rate
when using the Wax and Dust Mop?

Table 2.1: The Time It Took the Participants to Apply Floor Wax Using Wax and Dust Mop
(Treatment A)

Participant no. Test site 1 Test site 2 Test site 3 Average

Participant 1 1.38 Minutes(s) 1.54 Minute(s) 2.21 Minute(s) 1.71
Participant 2 1.23 Minutes(s) 1.54 Minute(s) 2.18 Minutes(s) 1.65
Participant 3 1.13 Minute(s) 1.54 Minute(s) 2.13 Minute(s) 1.60
Participant 4 1.14 Minutes(s) 1.51 Minutes(s) 2.16 Minutes(s) 1.60
Participant 5 1.16 Minute(s) 1.53 Minute(s) 2.13 Minute(s) 1.60

Finding the Mean

Sum of Terms / Number of Terms

1.38 + 1.54 + 2.21 = 5.13 = 5.13 / 3 = 1.71

1.23 + 1.54 + 2.18 = 4.95 = 4.95 / 3 = 1.65

1.13 + 1.54 + 2.13 = 4.80 = 4.80 / 3 = 1.60

1.14 + 1.51 + 2.16 = 4.81 = 4.81 / 3 = 1.60

Finding the Standard Deviation

√ (Sum of Terms – Total Mean)2 / Number of Terms – 1

1.71 + 1.65 + 1.60 + 1.60 + 1.60 = 8.16 / 5 = 1.63

√ (1.71 – 1.63)2 + (1.65 – 1.63)2 + (1.60 – 1.63)2 + (1.60 – 1.63)2 + (1.60 – 1.63)2 / 5 – 1

√ (0.08)2 + (0.02)2 + (-0.3)2 + (-0.3)2 + (-0.3)2 / 5 - 1 = 0.13

The Table 2.1 presented the time and remarks for how fast the participants applied Floor wax
on the given area “Wax and Dust Mop” in minutes.

13
Table 2.2: The Time It Took the Participants to Apply Floor Wax Manually (Treatment B)

Participant no. Test site 1 Test site 2 Test site 3 Average

Participant 1 2.40 Minutes(s) 3.01 Minute(s) 3.58 Minute(s) 2.99
Participant 2 2.38 Minutes(s) 2.51 Minute(s) 4.02 Minutes(s) 2.97
Participant 3 2.32 Minutes(s) 2.44 Minute(s) 3.56 Minute(s) 2.77
Participant 4 2.34 Minute(s) 2.33 Minute(s) 3.59 Minute(s) 2.72
Participant 5 2.33 Minute(s) 2.47 Minute(s) 3.55 Minute(s) 2.78

Procedure in finding the mean

Sum of Terms / Number of Terms

2.40 + 3.01 + 3.58 = 8.99 8.99 / 3 = 2.99

2.38 + 2.51 + 4.02 = 8,91 8,91 / 3 = 2.97

2.32 + 2.44 + 3.56 = 8.32 8.32 / 3 = 2.77

2.34 + 2.33 + 3.59 = 8.17 8.17 / 3 = 2.72

2.33 + 2.47 + 3.55 = 8.35 8.35 / 3 = 2.78

Procedure in finding the standard deviation

√ (Sum of Terms – Total Mean)2 / Number of Terms – 1

2.99 + 2.97 + 2.77 + 2.72+ 2.72 = 14.23 / 5 = 2.85

√ (2.99 – 2.85)2 + (2.97 – 2.85)2 + (2.77 – 2.85)2 + (2.72 – 2.85)2 + (2.78 – 2.85)2 / 5 – 1

√ (0.14)2 + (0.12)2 + (-0.8)2 + (-0.13)2 + (-0.7)2 / 5 - 1 = 0.27

The Table 2.2 presented the time and remarks for how fast the participants applied Floor wax
on the given area manually in minutes.

14
Table 2.3: The T – Test Result on the comparison of the significance of

Feature Mean Standard Sample Size T - Statistic Degrees P-Value

Deviation of
Freedom
Wax and 1.63 0.13 5 -12.2 8 < 0.001
Dust Mop
Manual 2.85 0.27 5
Application

Finding the Pooled Variance

(Number of Terms(A)-1 + (Standard Deviation(A))2 + (Number of Terms(B) + (Standard

Deviation(B))2 / Number of Terms(A) + Number of Terms(B) – 2

(5−1) (0.13)2 + (5−1) (0.27)2 / 5 + 5 – 2 = 0.04

Finding the T – Statistic

Total Mean (A) – Total Mean (B) / √ Pooled Variance (1 / Number of Terms(A)) (1 / Number
of Terms(B))

1.63 − 2.85 / √ (0.04) (1 / 5 + 1 / 5) = -12.2

Finding the Degrees of Freedom

Number of Terms(A) + Number of Terms(B) – 2

5+5–2=8

Finding the P – Value

With a t - statistic of -12.2 and 8 degrees of freedom, the p - value is extremely small (much
less than 0.001). t's safe to say it's highly statistically significant.

The Table 2.3 presented he t-test, it reveals a highly significant difference (p < 0.001)
between the average time taken to apply floor wax using the wax and dust mop method and the
manual application method. The manual application method takes significantly longer. The large t-
statistic (-12.2) further emphasizes the strength of this difference. The results strongly support the
conclusion that the wax and dust mop method is considerably faster.

15
 CHAPTER 5

DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

This study is aimed to develop a Mop that has as a feature that enables it to spread floor wax
faster and increase efficiency, reduce skin contact and bad postures, this is known as the “Wax and
Dust Mop”.

Discussion

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Wax and Dust
Mop in applying floor wax compared to traditional manual methods. The findings demonstrate a
significant advantage in both time efficiency and user convenience when utilizing the Wax and Dust
Mop.

Time Efficiency

The data collected indicate that the average time taken to apply floor wax using the Wax and
Dust Mop was significantly less than the time taken using manual application methods. Specifically,
as shown in Table 1.1, Wax and dust mop show a significance with a total average mean of 1.63. In
contrast, the manual application with a total average mean of 2.85.

These results reveal a consistent time savings when using the Wax and Dust Mop, with an
average reduction of -12.2, as detailed in Table 2.3. This time efficiency is particularly beneficial for
students and busy professionals who need to manage their time effectively. The reduced application
time not only allows for quicker cleaning routines but also enhances the overall productivity of
individuals responsible for floor maintenance.

Cleaning Rate and User Convenience

The study also investigated whether there is a significant relationship between the cleaning
rate of students when using the Wax and Dust Mop. The results from Table 2.3, which utilized the T
– Test for significance comparison, indicate that the Wax and Dust Mop consistently outperformed
manual application in terms of speed. The ranked data clearly show that all top-ranking times
belonged to the Wax and Dust Mop, confirming that this tool enhances the cleaning rate
significantly.

16
 Additionally, the design of the Wax and Dust Mop addresses ergonomic concerns, as
highlighted by Unfallversicherung (2019), which noted the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints
among cleaning personnel. By minimizing the need for bending or squatting, the Wax and Dust Mop
not only reduces physical strain but also lowers the risk of injuries commonly associated with
Manual application of floor wax. The convenience of a hands-free application further aids
individuals with allergies to floor wax, as it minimizes direct contact with irritants.

Implications for Various User Groups

The findings of this study have significant implications for various user groups. For students,
the ease and efficiency of the Wax and Dust Mop facilitate quicker cleaning processes, allowing for
better time management amidst academic responsibilities. Homeowners and property managers can
benefit from the effective and professional-level finish achieved with reduced effort, ensuring
consistent quality in floor maintenance.

Small business owners, particularly those in high-traffic areas, can leverage the time-saving
benefits of the Wax and Dust Mop to maintain clean and appealing environments without incurring
additional costs for professional cleaning services. Lastly, individuals with sensitivities or allergies to
chemical components in traditional floor waxes can benefit from the reduced exposure when using
this innovative applicator.

17
 CHAPTER 6

CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the conclusion, and recommendations of the study.

Conclusion

This study successfully demonstrated the superior efficiency and user-friendliness of the Wax
and Dust Mop compared to traditional manual methods of floor wax application. The quantitative
data consistently showed significant time savings across various test areas, with the Wax and Dust
Mop consistently outperforming manual application. This time efficiency translates to increased
productivity for individuals and businesses alike, reducing labor costs and improving workflow. The
ergonomic design of the Wax and Dust Mop, minimizing bending and squatting, addresses a
significant concern in the cleaning industry, reducing the risk of musculoskeletal injuries. Reducing
the risk of irritations to the skin, mouth, eyes and throat, as well as Neurological Problems like
dizziness, drowsiness and confusion. The hands-free application method also provides a significant
advantage for individuals with allergies to floor wax components.

This study provides compelling evidence for the effectiveness of the Wax and Dust Mop in
enhancing the efficiency of floor wax application compared to traditional manual methods. The data
reveal significant time savings when using the Wax and Dust Mop across various test sites,
demonstrating a total average mean of 1.63, as indicated in Table 2.3. In contrast, the manual
application shops a total average mean of 2.85, as shown in Table 2.3. This results in an average
reduction of -12.2 indicated in Table 2.3, highlighting the Wax and Dust Mop's capability to
streamline the floor waxing process significantly.

Moreover, the study's design enables a clear comparison of cleaning rates between the two
methods. As presented in Table 2.3, The T – Test results shows a significance comparison, it reveals
a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) between the average time taken to apply floor wax using
the wax and dust mop method and the manual application method, further establishing its superiority
over manual methods. This significant difference in cleaning rates suggests that adopting the Wax
and Dust Mop could lead to improved floor maintenance practices in various settings, from schools
to commercial spaces.

While the study provided strong evidence supporting the Wax and Dust Mop's effectiveness,
several limitations were identified. The relatively small sample size and limited testing environment
necessitate further research to confirm the generalizability of these findings across diverse settings

18
and user groups. A more comprehensive statistical analysis, including inferential tests and effect
sizes, would strengthen the conclusions and allow for more precise estimations of the time savings.
Furthermore, a formal ergonomic evaluation would provide more robust evidence of the mop's health
benefits.

Despite these limitations, the study's results clearly indicate the potential of the Wax and Dust
Mop as a valuable tool for improving floor wax application. The combination of time efficiency,
ergonomic benefits, and allergy-friendly design positions this innovative product as a viable solution
for various users, ranging from students and homeowners to businesses and property managers.
Future research should focus on addressing the identified limitations, expanding the scope of the
study, and exploring the long-term effects of the Wax and Dust Mop on floor condition and user
health. By incorporating these recommendations, future studies can provide even more compelling
evidence supporting the Wax and Dust Mop's efficacy and market potential. The findings of this
study provide a strong foundation for further development and commercialization of this innovative
cleaning tool.

Recommendation

Based on the total finding, conclusion and evaluation of Wax and Dust Mop
The following research Recommendations were proposed and suggested:

Diverse Settings and Floor Types: Conduct the study in various settings (homes, offices, different
types of schools) and with different floor types (hardwood, tile, vinyl). This will assess the Wax and
Dust Mop's effectiveness across a broader range of conditions and improve the external validity of
the study.

Enhanced Portability: Incorporating a smaller design without reducing efficiency can really help it
improve the portability. This can be done by using a smaller rods and mop parts.

Better Parts: The Researchers Suggest using a bigger magazine size, wider mop head and a longer
body, this avoids messier outcomes and improves the features the product is intended to do.

19