0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views5 pages

CH 3

Chapter 3 discusses integers and abelian groups, defining an abelian group as a set with an associative, commutative operation and an identity element. Examples include the sets of integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers under addition or multiplication. The chapter also introduces concepts like addition mod n, roots of unity, and properties of abelian groups, including cancellation and the structure of their multiplication tables.

Uploaded by

sauravsatyam556
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views5 pages

CH 3

Chapter 3 discusses integers and abelian groups, defining an abelian group as a set with an associative, commutative operation and an identity element. Examples include the sets of integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers under addition or multiplication. The chapter also introduces concepts like addition mod n, roots of unity, and properties of abelian groups, including cancellation and the structure of their multiplication tables.

Uploaded by

sauravsatyam556
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Chapter 3

Integers and Abelian groups

The set integers Z = {. . . − 2, −1, 0, 1, . . .} is obtained by adding negative num-


bers to the set of natural numbers. This makes arithmetic easier.
Addition satisfies the rules (1.1), (1.2), (1.3) as before. In addition, there is
new operation n 7→ −n satisfying

For each n ∈ Z, n + (−n) = 0 (3.1)

The cancellation law becomes redundant as we will see.


We will now abstract this:
Definition 3.1. An abelian group consists of a set A with an associative com-
mutative binary operation ∗ and an identity element e ∈ A satisfying a ∗ e = a
and such that any element a has an inverse a0 which satisfies a ∗ a0 = e.
Abelian groups are everywhere. Here list a few some examples.
Let Q = {a/b | a, b ∈ Z, b 6= 0} be the set of rational numbers, the R the set
of real numbers and C the set of complex numbers.
Example 3.2. The sets Z, Q, R or C with ∗ = + and e = 0 are abelian groups.
Example 3.3. The set Q∗ , (or R∗ or C∗ ) of nonzero rational (or real or com-
plex) numbers with ∗ = · (multiplication) and e = 1 is an abelian group. The
inverse in this case is just the reciprocal.
Example 3.4. Let n be a positive integer. Let Zn = {(a1 , a2 , . . . an )|a1 , . . . an ∈
Z}. We define (a1 , . . . an ) + (b1 , . . . bn ) = (a1 + b1 , . . . an + bn ) and 0 = (0, . . . 0).
Then Zn becomes an abelian group. Z can be replaced by Q, R or C and these
examples are probably familiar from linear algebra.
Example 3.5. Let n be a positive integer, Zn = {0, 1, . . . n − 1}. Arrange these
on the face of a “clock”. We define a new kind of operation ⊕ called addition
mod n. To compute a ⊕ b, we set the “time” to a and then count off b hours.
We’ll give a more precise description later. Unlike the previous examples, this
is a finite abelian group.

11
Often, especially in later sections, we will simply use + instead ⊕ because
it easier to write. We do this in the diagram below:

0=2+2

3=2+1 1=2+3

2=2+0

Here’s the addition table for Z8 .

⊕ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0
2 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1
3 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2
4 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3
5 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4
6 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5
7 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Notice that the table is symmetric (i.e. interchanging rows with columns
gives the same thing). This is because the commutative law holds. The fact
that that 0 is the identity corresponds to the fact that the row corresponding
0 is identical to the top row. There is one more notable feature of this table:
every row contains each of the elements 0, . . . 7 exactly once. A table of elements
with this property is called a latin square. As we will see this is always true for
any abelian group.
We can now define the precise addition law for Zn . Given a, b ∈ Zn , a ⊕ b =
r(a + b, n), where r is the remainder introduced before.
When doing calculations in Maple, we can use the mod operator. For exam-
ple to add 32 ⊕ 12 in Z41 , we just type

32 + 12 mod 41;

Let n be a positive integer, a complex number z is called an nth root of unity


if z n = 1. Let µn be the set of all nth roots of unity. For example, µ2 = {1, −1}
and µ4 = {1, −1, i, −i}.

Example 3.6. µn becomes an abelian group under multiplication


To see that this statement make sense, note that given two elements z 1 , z2 ∈
µn , their product lies in µn since (z1 z2 )n = z1n z2n = 1 and 1/z1 ∈ µn since

12
(1/z1 )n = 1. We can describe all the elements of µn with the help of Euler’s
formula:
eiθ = cos θ + i sin θ.


e

2(n−1)π
Lemma 3.7. µn = {eiθ | θ = 0, 2π 4π
n , n ,... n }
Proof. The equation z n = 1 can have at most n solutions since it has degree n
(we will prove this later on). So it’s enough to verify that all of the elements
on the right are really solutions. Each element is of the form z = eiθ with
θ = 2πk/n with k an integer. Then

z n = einθ = cos(2πk) + i sin(2πk) = 1.

The lemmas says that the elements are equally spaced around the unit circle
of C.
Since eiθ1 eiθ2 = ei(θ1 +θ2 ) , multiplication amounts to adding the angles. This
sounds suspiciously like the previous example. We will see they are essentially
the same.
Lemma 3.8. (Cancellation) Suppose that (A, ∗, e) is an abelian group. Then
a ∗ b = a ∗ c implies b = c.
Proof. By assumption, there exists a0 with a0 ∗ a = a ∗ a0 = e. Therefore

a0 ∗ (a ∗ b) = a0 ∗ (a ∗ c)

(a0 ∗ a) ∗ b = (a0 ∗ a) ∗ c

13
e∗b=e∗c
b = c.

Corollary 3.9. Given a, there is a unique element a0 , called the inverse, such
that a ∗ a0 = e.
Lemma 3.10. The multiplication table
* a1 . . .
a1 . . .
..
.
of any abelian group A = {a1 , a2 , . . .} forms a symmetric latin square.
Proof. The symmetry follows from the commutative law. Suppose that A =
{a1 , a2 , . . .}. Then the ith row of the table consists of ai ∗ a1 , ai ∗ a2 . . .. Given
a ∈ A, the equation a = ai ∗ (a0i ∗ a) shows that a occurs somewhere in this row.
Suppose that it occurs twice, that is ai ∗ aj = ai ∗ ak = a for aj 6= ak . Then this
would contradict the cancellation lemma.
Let (A, ∗, e) be a group. Given a ∈ A and n ∈ Z, define an by

 a ∗ a . . . a ( n times) if n > 0
an = e if n = 0
 0
a ∗ a0 . . . a0 ( −n times) if n < 0
Often the operation on A is written as +, in which case the inverse of a is
usually written as −a, and we write na instead of an . When A = Z, this noth-
ing but the definition of multiplication. It’s possible to prove the associative,
commutative and distributive laws for Z, but we’ll skip this.

3.11 Exercises
1. Let A = {e, a, b} with e, a, b distinct and the following multiplication table:

* e a b
e e a b
a a e b
b b b a

Is A an abelian group? Prove it, or explain what goes wrong.


2. Let A = {e, a} with a 6= e and the following multiplication table:

* e a
e e a
a a e

14
Is A an abelian group? Prove it, or explain what goes wrong.

3. Let (A, ∗, e) be an abelian group. Let a0 denote the inverse of a. Prove


that e0 = e, (a0 )0 = a and (a ∗ b)0 = a0 ∗ b0 .

4. With notation as above, prove that (an )0 = (a0 )n for any natural number
n by induction. This proves (an )−1 = (a−1 )n = a−n as one would hope.

5. Let (A, ∗, e) and (B, ∗, ²) be two abelian groups. Let A × B = {(a, b) | a ∈


A, b ∈ B}. Define (a1 , b1 ) ∗ (a2 , b2 ) = (a1 ∗ a2 , b1 ∗ b2 ) and E = (e, ²). Prove
that (A × B, ∗, E) is an abelian group. This is called the direct product
of A and B. For example Z2 = Z × Z.

6. Write down the multiplication tables for µ2 , µ3 , µ4 and µ5 .

7. An element ω ∈ µn is called a primitive root if any element can be written


as a power of ω. Check that e2πi/5 ∈ µ5 is primitive. Determine all the
others in this group.

15

You might also like