SLOPE STABILITY
Chapter Four
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Mass Method
o Method of Slices
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface
o Culmann’s Method
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Mass Method
o Method of Slices
SLOPE STABILITY
What is a Slope?
An exposed ground surface that stands at an angle with the horizontal.
Why do we need slope stability?
In geotechnical engineering, the topic stability of slopes deals with:
1. The engineering design of slopes of man-made slopes in advance
(a) Earth dams and embankments,
(b) Excavated slopes,
(c) Deep-seated failure of foundations and retaining walls.
2. The study of the stability of existing or natural slopes of earthworks and
natural slopes.
o In any case the ground not being level results in gravity components of the
weight tending to move the soil from the high point to a lower level. When
the component of gravity is large enough, slope failure can occur, i.e. the soil
mass slide downward.
o The stability of any soil slope depends on the shear strength of the soil
typically expressed by friction angle () and cohesion (c).
TYPES OF SLOPE
Slopes can be categorized into two groups:
A. Natural slope
• Hill sides
• Mountains
• River banks
B. Man-made slope
• Fill (Embankment)
• Earth dams
• Canal banks
• Excavation sides
• Trenches
• Highway Embankments
Case histories of slope failure
• Some of these failure can cause dramatic impact on lives
and environment.
Slope failures cost billions of $
every year in some countries
Case histories of slope failure
Bolivia, 4 March 2003, 14 people killed, 400 houses buried
Case histories of slope failure
Brazil, January 2003, 8 people killed
Case histories of slope failure
Case histories of slope failure
Case histories of slope failure
Slides: Rotational (slump)
Case histories of slope failure
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface
o Culmann’s Method
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Mass Method
o Method of Slices
Types of Slope Movements
o Slope instability (movement) can be classified into six
different types:
Falls
Topples
Slides
Flows
Creep
Lateral spreads
Falls
• Rapidly moving mass of material (rock or soil) that travels mostly
through the air with little or no interaction between moving unit
and another.
• As they fall, the mass will roll and bounce into the air with great
force and thus shatter the material into smaller fragments.
• It typically occurs for rock faces and usually does not provide
warning.
• Analysis of this type of failure is very complex and rarely done.
Falls
• Gravitational effect and shear strength
Gravity has two components of forces:
T driving forces: T= W. sin
Boulder N resisting forces (because of friction)
N = W. cos
N T
the interface develop its
resistance from friction ():
S = friction S = N tan
In terms of stresses:
S/A = N/A tan
or
f = tan
A = effective Base Area of sliding block
Falls
Topples
This is a forward rotation of soil and/or rock mass about an axis
below the center of gravity of mass being displaced.
Slides
o Movements occur along planar failure surfaces that may run more-or less
parallel to the slope.
o Movement is controlled by discontinuities or weak bedded planes.
Back-Scrap
A
Slides
A. Translational (planar)
Bulging at
Toe
Weak bedding
plane
Occur when soil of significantly
different strength is presented (Planar)
Slides
B. Rotational (curved)
This is the downward movement of a soil mass occurring on an
almost circular surface of rupture.
B
Back-Scrap
Bulging
Curved escarpment
C. Compound (curved) (Slumps)
Slides
Slides
Reinforcement
Soil nails
Slides
Reinforcement
Anchors
تادادش
Possible failure
surface
Flows
o The materials moves like a
viscous fluid. The failure plane
here does not have a specific
shape.
It can take place in soil with
high water content or in dry
soils. However, this type of
failure is common in the QUICK
CLAYS, like in Norway.
Flows
Creep
• It is the very slow movement of slope material that occur over a long
period of time
• It is identified by bent post or trees.
Lateral spreads
o Lateral spreads usually occur on very gentle slopes or essentially flat terrain,
especially where a stronger upper layer of rock or soil undergoes extension
and moves above an underlying softer, weaker layer.
weaker layer
Types of Slope Failures
In general, there are six types of slope failures:
1. Falls
2. Topples
Slide is the most
3. Slides common mode of
• Translational (planar) slope failure, and it will
• Rotational (curved) be our main focus in
this course
4. Flows
5. Creep
6. Lateral spreads
Types of Slide Failure Surfaces
• Failure of slopes generally occur along surfaces known as failure surfaces.
• The main types of surfaces are:
• Planar Surfaces: Occurs in frictional, non
cohesive soils
• Rotational surfaces: Occurs in cohesive soils
Circular surface Non-circular surface
(homogeneous soil) (non-homogeneous soil)
Types of Slide Failure Surfaces
• Compound Slip Surfaces:
When there is hard stratum at some depth that intersects
with the failure plane
• Transitional Slip Surfaces:
When there is a hard stratum at a
relatively shallow depth
Types of Failure Surfaces
Failure surface 1
Long plane
Infinite
failure surface
Translational
2
(planar)
Plane failure
Finite
Slides
surface
3
Above the toe
Rotational
Finite Through the toe
(curved)
Deep seated
Types of Failure Surfaces
Types of Failure Surfaces Considered in this Course are
1
Stability of infinite slopes
2
Stability of finite slopes with plane
failure surfaces
3
Stability of finite slopes with circular
failure surfaces
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface
o Culmann’s Method
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Mass Method
o Method of Slices
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
In general we need to check
The stability of a given existed slope
Determine the inclination angle for a slope that we want to
build with a given height
The height for a slope that we want to build with a given
inclination
Methodology of Slope Stability Analysis
It is a method to expresses the relationship between resisting forces and
driving forces
• Driving forces – forces which move earth materials downslope. Downslope
component of weight of material including vegetation, fill material, or
buildings.
• Resisting forces – forces which oppose movement. Resisting forces include
strength of material
• Failure occurs when the driving forces (component of the
gravity) overcomes the resistance derived from the shear
strength of soil along the potential failure surface.
Methodology of Slope Stability Analysis
The analysis involves determining and comparing the shear stress developed
along the most likely rupture surface to the shear strength of soil.
Slope Stability Analysis Procedure
1. Assume a probable failure surface.
2. Calculate the factor of safety by determining and comparing
the shear stress developed along the most likely rupture
surface to the shear strength of soil.
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 to determine the most likely failure
surface. The most likely failure surface is the critical surface
that has a minimum factor of safety.
4. Based on the minimum FS, determine whether the slope is
safe or not.
Assumptions of Stability Analysis
o The problem is considered in two-dimensions
o The failure mass moves as a rigid body
o The shear strength along the failure surface is isotropic
o The factor of safety is defined in terms of the average shear
stress and average shear strength along the failure surface
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface
o Culmann’s Method
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Mass Method
o Method of Slices
39
Factor of Safety
Factor of safety Resisting Force
Driving Force
Shear Strength
Shear Stress
f= Avg. Shear strength of soil
Fs f
d d= Avg. Shear stress developed along the failure surface
40
Factor of Safety
• The most common analytical methods of slope stability use a
factor of safety FS with respect to the limit equilibrium condition,
Fs is the ratio of resisting forces to the driving forces, or
Shear strength (resisting movement)
(Available)
average shear strength of the soil.
Shear stress (driving movement)
average shear stress (developed)
developed along the potential
failure surface.
FS < 1 unstable
Generally, FS ≥ 1.5 is acceptable
FS ≈ 1 marginal
for the design of a stable slope
FS >> 1 stable
If factor safety Fs equal to or less than 1, the slope is
considered in a state of impending failure
41
The important geotechnical properties affecting stability of a
slope are shear strength of material.
Others
particle size distribution
density
permeability
moisture content
Plasticity
angle of repose.
The strength of rock mass is a very important factor that
affects the stability of slopes. 42
Factor of Safety
Where:
c’ = cohesion
’ = angle of internal friction
cd ,d = cohesion and angle of
friction that develop along
the potential failure surface
Other aspects of factor of safety
Factor of safety with respect to cohesion
Factor of safety with respect to friction
When the factor of safety with respect to cohesion is equal to the
factor of safety with respect to friction, it gives the factor of safety
with respect to strength, or
When Fc F then Fs Fc F
43
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Mass Method
o Method of Slices
44
Stability of Infinite Slopes
What is an Infinite slope?
• Slope that extends for a relatively long distance and has
consistent subsurface profile can be considered as infinite slope.
• Failure plane parallel to slope surface.
• Depth of the failure surface is small compared to the height of
the slope.
• For the analysis, forces acting on a single slice of the sliding mass
along the failure surface is considered and end effects is
neglected.
45
Infinite Slope
The shear strength of the soil may be given by
Assuming that the pore water pressure is zero, we will evaluate the
factor of safety against a possible slope failure along a plane AB
located at a depth H below the ground surface.
The slope failure can occur by the movement of soil above the plane
AB from right to left.
Let us consider a slope element abcd that has a unit length
perpendicular to the plane of the section shown.
The forces, F, that act on the faces ab and cd are equal and opposite
and may be ignored.
Infinite Slope
The weight of the soil element is
Infinite slope – no seepage
Force parallel to the plane AB Ta =
W sin = LH sin
(*)
The resistive shear stress is given by
48
Infinite slope – no seepage
The effective normal stress at the base of the slope element is given by
(**)
Equating R.H.S. of Eqs. (*) and (**) gives
(***)
tan
For Granular Soil (i.e., c = 0) Fs
tan
This means that in case of infinite slope in sand, the value of Fs is
independent of the height H and the slope is stable as long as < ’ 50
Case of Granular soil – Derivation From Simple Statics Extra
L Equilibrium of forces on a slice:
FS Resisting Forces
Driving Forces
51
Infinite slope – no seepage
Critical Depth, Hcr
The depth of plane along which critical equilibrium occurs is
obtained by substituting Fs = 1 and H = Hcr into Eq. (***)
52
Infinite slope – with steady state seepage
Seepage is assumed to be parallel to the slope
and that the ground water level coincides with
the ground surface.
The shear stress at the base of
the slope element can be given
(*)
The resistive shear stress developed at
the base of the element is given by
(**)
53
Infinite slope – with steady state seepage
Equating the right-hand sides of Eq. (*) and Eq. (**) yields
(***)
Recall
(****)
Substituting Eq. (****) Into Eq. (***) and solving for Fs gives
c tan
Fs
H cos2 tan tan
No seepage
53
EXAMPLE
54
EXAMPLE
55
EXAMPLE
56
Stability of Infinite Slopes
• Cohesive Soils
With seepage No seepage
tan '
tan ' tan'
c'
c ' c' tan ' c '
d F d F d Fs d F
s s s
Fs c' ' tan' Fs c' tan'
sat H cos2 tan sat tan H cos2 tan tan
Hcr c'
Hcr c' 1
cos2 ( sat tan 'tan') cos2 (tan tan ')
d
57
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Granular Soils
With seepage No seepage
c' 0.0 c' 0.0
' tan '
tan'
c' c'
Fs Fs
sat H cos 2 tan sat tan
H cos2 tan tan
Fs ' tan ' Fs tan'
sat tan tan
Independant of H Slope is stable as long as <
58
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Mass Method
o Method of Slices
59
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface
o Culmann’s Method
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Method of Slices
60
Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
Modes of Failure
i. Slope failure
• Surface of sliding intersects the slope at or above its
toe.
1. The failure circle is referred to as a toe circle if it passes
through the toe of the slope
1. The failure circle is referred to as a slope circle if it
passes above the toe of the slope.
ii. Shallow failure
Under certain circumstances, a shallow slope failure
can occur.
Shallow slope
failure 73
Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
iii. Base failure
o The surface of sliding passes
at some distance below the
toe of the slope.
o The circle is called the H
midpoint circle because its
center lies on a vertical line
drawn through the midpoint of
the slope.
Firm Base
o For 53o always toe
o For < 53o could be toe, slope, or midpoint and that depends on depth
function D where:
Depth function:
62
Types of Stability Analysis Procedures
Various procedures of stability analysis may, in general, be divided into two major
classes:
1. Mass procedure
• In this case, the mass of the soil above the surface of sliding is taken as a unit.
• This procedure is useful when the soil that
forms the slope is assumed to be
homogeneous.
2. Method of slices
• Most natural slopes and many man made
slopes consist of more than on soil with
different properties.
• In this case the use of mass procedure is inappropriate.
76
Types of Stability Analysis Procedures
• In the method of slices procedure, the soil above the surface of
sliding is divided into a number of vertical parallel slices.
• The stability of each slice is calculated separately.
• It is a general method that can be used for analyzing irregular slopes
in non-homogeneous slopes in which the values of c’ and ’
are not constant and pore water pressure can be taken into
consideration.
77
TOPICS
Introduction
Types of slope movements
Concepts of Slope Stability Analysis
Factor of Safety
Stability of Infinite Slopes
Stability of Finite Slopes with Plane Failure Surface
Stability of Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
o Method of Slices
65
Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
• Fellenius (1927) and Taylor (1937) have analytically solved for
the minimum factor of safety and critical circles.
• They expressed the developed cohesion as
cd H m
Where
• We then can calculate the min Fs as m Stability number
H height of slope
γ unit weight of soil
c
or m d
H
• The critical height (i.e., Fs = 1) of the slope can be evaluated by
substituting H = Hcr and cd = cu (full mobilization of the undrained shear
strength) into the preceding equation. Thus, 66
Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
The results of analytical solution to obtain critical circles was represented
graphically as the variation of stability number, m , with slope angle
Toe slope Toe, Midpoint or slope circles
Firm Stratum
m is obtained from this chart depending on angle 83
Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
Failure Circle
For a slope angle > 53°, the critical circle is always a toe circle. The
location of the center of the critical toe circle may be found with the aid of
Figure 15.14.
For < 53°, the critical circle may be a toe, slope, or midpoint circle,
depending on the location of the firm base under the slope. This is called
the depth function, which is defined as
68
Location of the center of the critical toe circle
The location of the center of the
critical toe circle may be found with
the aid of Figure 15.13
(radius)
Figure 15.13
69
Finite Slopes with Circular Failure Surface
When the critical circle is a midpoint circle (i.e., the
failure surface is tangent to the firm base), its position
can be determined with the aid of Figure 15.14.
Figure 15.14
Firm base
86
Critical toe circles for slopes
with < 53°
The location of these circles can be
determined with the use of Figure 15.15
and Table 15.1.
Figure 15.15
Note that these critical toe circle are not necessarily the most critical circles that exist.87
How to use the stability chart? Given: , H, , cu Required: min Fs
m = 0.195
1. Get m from chart
2. Calculate cd from
cd H m
3. Calculate Fs
cu
Fs
cd
88
How to use the previous chart?
Given: , H, , cu, HD (depth to hard stratum) Required: min. Fs
D = Distance from the top surface of slope to firm base
Height of the slope
m = 0.178
1. Calculate D = HD/H
2. Get m from the chart
3. Calculate cd from
cd H m
cu
4. Calculate Fs Fs
cd
Note that recent investigation put angle at 58o instead of the 53o value. 89
EXAMPLE
90
Rock layer
SOLUTION
D=1.5m
91
SOLUTION
92
Slopes in Homogeneous clay Soil with c 0 , = 0
The results of analytical solution to obtain critical circles was represented
graphically as the variation of stability number, m , with slope angle
Toe slope Toe, Midpoint or slope circles
Firm Stratum
m is obtained from this chart depending on angle
93
Method of Slice
Geometry of Ordinary Method of Slices. Example of dividing the failure mass in slices
Method of Slope Stability Analysis
Method of Slices
• Non-homogenous soils (mass procedure is not accurate)
• Soil mass is divided into several vertical Parallel slices
• The width of each slice need not be the same
• It is sometimes called the Swedish method
112
Method of Slices
• It is a general method that can be used for analyzing irregular slopes in
non-homogeneous slopes in which the values of c’ and ’ are not
constant.
• Because the SWEDISH GEOTECHNCIAL COMMISION used this method
extensively, it is sometimes referred to as the SWEDISH Method.
• In mass procedure only the moment equilibrium is satisfied. Here attempt
is made to satisfy force equilibrium.
1, c’1,
’1
2, c’2, , c’, ’
’2
3, c’3,
’3
Irregular Slope 113
Non-homogeneous Slope
Method of Slices
• The soil mass above the trial slip surface is divided into several vertical parallel
slices. The width of the slices need not to be the same (better to have it equal).
• The accuracy of calculation increases if the number of slices is increased.
• The base of each slice is assumed to be a straight line.
• The inclination of the base to the horizontal is .
• The height measured in the center line is h.
• The height measured in the center line is h.
• The procedure requires that a
series of trial circles are chosen
and analyzed in the quest for
the circle with the minimum
factor of safety.
Tr
114
Method of Slices
• Forces acting on each slice
• Total weight wi=hb
• Total normal force at the base Nr = *L
• Shear force at the base Tr=*L
• Total normal forces on the sides, Pn and Pn+1
• Shear forces on the sides, Tn and Tn+1
• 5 unknowns Tr ,Pn ,Pn+1 ,Tn ,Tn+1
• 3 equations Fx=0 , Fy=0 ,M=0
• System is statically indeterminate
• Assumptions must be made to solve the
problem
• Different assumptions yield different methods
• Two Methods:
• Ordinary Method of Slices (Fellenius Method)
• Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
115
Method of Slices
For the whole sliding mass
Mo 0
W *r*sin - T *r 0
W *sin T
f
T d *l *l
F
s
W *sin f *l
Fs
f *l
Fs
W *sin
(c*l *tan *l)
Fs n
W *sin 116
Method of Slices
(c*l *tan *l)
Fs n
W *sin
n *l N
Fs c*l tan *N
W *sin
Equation is exact but approximations are introduced in finding
the value of force N
Two Methods:
• Ordinary Method of Slices
• Bishop's Simplified Method of Slices
84
Ordinary Method of Slices
Fellenius’ Method
Assumption
For each slice, the resultant of the interslice forces is
zero.
The resultants of Pn and Tn are equal to the resultants
of Pn+1 and Tn+1, also their lines of actions coincide.
Rn
Rn+1
85
Ordinary Method of Slices
Fn 0 (to stay away from Tr )
N r Wn * cos n n
( c* l W * cos tan )
Fs n n n
Wn * sinn
For undrained condition:
c cu 0
cul
Fs
Wn * sinn
86
Ordinary Method of Slices
Steps for Ordinary Method of Slices
• Draw the slope to a scale
• Divide the sliding wedge to various slices
• Calculate wn and n for each slice
• n is taken at the middle of the slice wn
wn
• Calculate the terms in the equation
( c* l W * cos tan )
Fs n n n
n
Wn* sinn n
+ve
-ve
• Fill the following table
Slice# wn n sin n cos n ln wn sin n wn cos n
87
EXAMPLE
Find Fs against sliding
Use the ordinary method of slices
88
Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
Assumption
For each slice, the resultant of the interslice forces is
Horizontal.
i.e. Tn =Tn+1
89
Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
Fy 0 (to stay away from Pn and Pn1 )
y
Wn N r * cos n Tr * sin n
c n tan
Tr d * ln ln
Fs
cl n n l n tan
Tr
Fs Fs
cl n N r tan
Tr
Fs Fs
cln N tan
Wn N r * cos n sin n r sin n
Fs Fs
90
Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
cln
Wn sin n
Fs
Nr
tan sin n
cos n
Fs
cln
sin n
Wn Fs
cl n tan
cos tan sin n
n
Fs bn
Fs but l n
tan sin n cos n
cos n
Fs
Fs
1
W n sin n
cb n W n tan
tan sin n
cos n
Fs
Trail and error procedure
91
Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
Steps for Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
• Draw the slope to a scale
• Divide the sliding wedge to various slices
• Calculate wn and n for each slice
• n is taken at the middle of the slice
• Calculate the terms in the equation
cb n W n tan
Fs
1
W n sin n
tan sin n
cos n
Fs
• Fill the following table
Slice# wn n sin n cos n bn wn sin n
• Assume Fs and plug it in the right-hand term of the equation
then calculate Fs
• Repeat the previous step until the assumed Fs = the
calculated Fs.
92
Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
tan sin n
m ( n ) cos n
Fs
1
( cb n W n tan )
Fs W n sin n
m ( n )
c' bn Wn tan
Fs
1
( )
Wn sin n cos n
sin n tan
Fs
93
Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
• Example of specialized software:
– Geo-Slope,
– Geo5,
– SVSlope
– Many others
94
Final Exam Fall 36-37 QUESTION #4
Determine the safety factor for the given trial rupture surface shown in
Figure 3. Use Bishop's simplified method of slices with first trial factor of
safety Fs = 1.8 and make only one iteration. The following table can be
prepared; however, only needed cells can be generated “filled”.
95
SOLUTION
Fs = 1.8
Table 1. “Fill only necessary cell for this particular problem”
Width Height Height Area Weight
Slice Wn sin
bn hl h2 A Wn α(n) mα(n)
No. (kN/m)
(m) (m) (m) (m2) (kN/m) (7) (8)
(1) (9)
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
1 22.4 70
2 294.4 54
3 ? 38
4 435.2 24
5 390 12
6 268.8 0.0
7 66.58 -8
96
Remarks on Method of Slices
o Bishop’s simplified method is probably the most widely used (but it has
to be incorporated into computer programs).
o It yields satisfactory results in most cases.
o The Fs determined by this method is an underestimate (conservative) but
the error is unlikely to exceed 7% and in most cases is less than 2%.
o The ordinary method of slices is presented in this chapter as a learning
tool only. It is used rarely now because it is too conservative.
o The Bishop Simplified Method yields factors of safety which are higher
than those obtained with the Ordinary Method of Slices.
o The two methods do not lead to the same critical circle.
o Analyses by more refined methods involving consideration of the forces acting
on the sides of slices show that the Simplified Bishop Method yields answers
for factors of safety which are very close to the correct answer. 130
Remarks on Method of Slices
Two Methods:
Ordinary Method of Slices
• Underestimate Fs (too conservative)
• Error compared to accurate methods (5-20%)
• Rarely used
Bishop’s Simplified Method of Slices
• The most widely used method
• Yields satisfactory results when applying computer
program
131