Law On Nego
Law On Nego
Explanation
Checks
Credit cards
Counterfeit money
Unauthorized reproductions
SECTION 1. Form of negotiable instrument.— 4. subsection (c) to (d) – promissory notes and
An instrument to be negotiable must conform bill of exchange
to the following requirements:
Subsection (e) – bill of exchange
(a) It must be in writing and signed by the
maker or drawer; Formal Requirements explained
8. The drawee must be named – bills and 2. Payee – by name or office or title or may
checks be unspecified
(a) Example: check payable only to a specified - additional parties can also become
person involved
SEC. 2. Certainly as to sum ; what constitutes. Sum to be Paid by Stated Installments with
—The sum payable sum is a sum certain within Acceleration Clause
the meaning of this Act, although it is to be
paid— 1. Accelaration dependent on maker
SEC. 3. When promise is unconditional.—An 2. Reason for requisite – enhances the ability of
unqualified order or promise to pay is the instrument to circulate freely from one
unconditional within the meaning of this Act, person to another.
though coupled with— (a) No one would accept a paper for debt if the
(a) An indication of a particular fund out of right to recover were not absolute or
which reimbursement is to be made, or a unconditional in nature
particular account to be debited with the (b) Even if the condition or event is very likely to
amount; or occur, or indeed, even if it, in fact did occur
(b) A statement of the transaction which gives subsequently, the instrument remains non-
rise to the instrument. negotiable, although it would, of course,
become payable at that time.
But an order or promise to pay out of a
particular fund is not unconditional. 3. Terms not affecting unconditional liability
When Promissory Note Contains a Promise to Indication of a particular Fund Out of which
Pay Reimbursement is to be made
1. Implied promise to pay – unconditional - The drawee is not limited to the money
promise to pay in his hands belonging to the drawer
- The fund indicated is not the direct
2. Bare acknowledgement of indebtedness – source of payment but only the source
(like “I.O.U.” , “due P P1,000”, “for value of reimbursement which is act
received,” etc.) alone is not a negotiable subsequent to the payment
instrument. However, “due P or order”, or “dur
P or bearer”, “I.O.U. P10,000 to be paid on Sept. Indication of a Particular Fund Out of which
30”, the instrument is negotiable. Payment is to be made
(a) a recital of the consideration for which 3. Reasons why time must be certain – The
the paper was given; or time must be certain so that the holder will
know when he may enforce the instrument,
(b) a statement of the origin of the and the person liable – the maker, drawee,
transaction; or or acceptor – when he may be required to
pay, or the secondary parties – the drawer,
indorser, or accommodation party – when (a) Authorizes the sale of collateral
his obligation will arise. securities in case the instrument be not
paid at maturity; or
When Instrument Payable at Determinable
Future Time (b) Authorizes a confession of judgment if
the instrument be not paid at maturity; or
- An instrument which is only payable
upon a contingency is not negotiable (c) Waives the benefit of any law
because it does not appear on its face intended for the advantage or protection
whether or not it will be paid. of the obligor; or
(1) Payable at a fixed time (d) Gives the holder an election to require
something to be done in lieu of payment of
(2) Payable at a fixed period after date money.
(3) Payable at a fixed period after sight But nothing in this section shall validate
After sight means after the instrument is any provision or stipulation otherwise
seen by the drawee upon presentment for illegal.
acceptance or accepted by the drawee. Acts in Addition to Payment of Money
(4) Payable on or before a fixed time A negotiable instrument must be payable in
(5) Payable on or before a determinable “a sum certain in money”
future time 1. General Rule – the instrument is non-
(6) Payable on the occurrence of a negotiable if it contains a promise or order
specified event to do any act in addition to the payment of
money.
(7) Payable after the occurrence of a
specified event 2. Exceptions –
SEC. 6. Omissions; seal; particular money. “value received” – does not even necessary
—The validity and negotiable character of to state that value has been received for
an instrument are not affected by the fact the instrument because consideration is
that— presumed
(b) Does not specify the value given, or - Does not require a negotiable
that any value has been given therefor; or instrument to specify the place where it
is made or drawn or where it is payable
(c) Does not specify the place where it is
drawn or the place where it is payable; or Effect of Presence of Seal
(d) Bears a seal; or 1. The fact that the instrument bears a seal
does not destroy its negotiability
(e) Designates a particular kind of current
money in which payment is to be made. 2. It is advisable, however, to have a bill or
note appear in a public instrument so that it
But nothing in this section shall alter or will be included among the preferred
repeal any statute requiring in certain credits with respect to other property of
cases the nature of the consideration to be the debtor.
stated in the instrument.
Effect of designation of particular kind of
Effect of Omission Date current money payable
1. Date of instrument generally not Money – not necessarily limited to “legal
necessary – the omission of the date will tender”
not make the instrument non-negotiable.
- Current money or foreign money
SEC. 7. When payable on demand.—An (e) One or some of several payees; or
instrument is payable on demand—
(f) The holder of an office for the time being.
(a) Where it is expressed to be payable on
demand, or at sight, or on presentation; or Where the instrument is payable to order the
payee must be named or otherwise indicated
(b) In which no time for payment is expressed. therein with reasonable certainty.
Instruments that are not payable on demand, 1. (a) to the order of specified person
called “time instruments”, are payable at a (b) to him or his order
definite time.
Note: An instrument payable to specified
1. Expressed to be payable on demand person is not an order instrument- non-
“on demand” – promissory note negotiable as a promise or order is limited to
paying one person
“at sight” - bill of exchange
2. “to P and assign” have been equivalent word
2. No time for payment is expressed
Person to whom order instrument may be
3. Payable on demand as regards the maker drawn
4. Payable on demand as regards the acceptor 1. to order of payee who is not the maker
5. Payable on demand as regards the indorser 2. to order of payee who is not the drawer
SEC. 8. When payable to order.—The 3. to order of payee who is not the drawee
instrument is payable to order where it is
drawn payable to the order of a specified 4. to order of drawer
person or to him or his order. It may be “Pay to cash” – draw a check
drawn payable to the order of—
5. to order of maker
(a) A payee who is not maker, drawer, or
drawee; or 6. to order a drawee
(d) Two or more payees jointly; or 9. to order a holder of an office for the time
being
“Pay to the order of the Commissioner of Fictitious Person – Meant to be one who,
Internal Revenue” or “Pay to the order of the though named as payee in an instrument, has
Treasurer, Philippines National Bank” no right to it
Effect where payee not named a described 4. Payable to order of a non-existing person
(a) When it is expressed to be so payable; or The blank indorsement makes the instrument
payable to bearer
(b) When it is payable to a person named
therein or bearer; or (c) When it is payable to 7. last indorsement in blank
the order of a fictitious or person, and such A blank indorsement cannot make a non-
fact was known to the person making it so negotiable instrument
payable; or
Indorsement – refers only to negotiable
(d) When the name of the payee does not instrument
purport to be the name of any person; or
SEC. 10. Terms, when sufficient.—The
(e) When the only or last indorsement is an instrument need not follow the language of
indorsement in blank, sufficient terms. this Act, but any terms are sufficient which
When instrument payable to bearer clearly indicate an intention to conform to the
requirements hereof.
Bearer – the person in possession of a bill or
note which is payable to bearer or legally Criterion of negotiability
qualifies as a bearer instrument. 1. Clear intention of the parties – the substance
- Good faith of the transaction rather than its form is the
- Without notice that his title is defective criterion of negotiability
at or after maturity, discharges the 2. Use of foreign language – written
instrument
3. Mere defect in language or grammatical
1. Expressed to be payable to bearer error – this not render an instrument non-
“bearer, P” – not negotiable – payable to negotiable
definite person only
Date in instrument payable at a fixed future Postdated – date later than the true date of its
date issuance
(a) Where the sum payable is expressed in 2. Words ambiguous or uncertain – the figures
words and also in figures and there is a control
discrepancy between the two, the sum 3. Date when stipulated interest to run not
denoted by the words is the sum payable; but specified – If no rate of interest is mentioned, it
if the words are ambiguous or uncertain, will draw interest at the legal rate
reference may be had to the figures to fix the
amount; 4. instrument undated – considered dated as of
the date of issuance
(b) Where the instrument provides for the
payment of interest, without specifying the 5. Written and printed words in conflict –
date from which interest is to run, the interest WRITTEN > PRINTED
runs from the date of the instrument, and if
6. Whether instrument bill or note in doubt –
the instrument is undated, from the issue
the holder may treat either at his election
thereof;
7. Capacity in which person signed in doubt –
(c) Where the instrument is not dated, it will
he is to be deemed an indorser
be considered to be dated as of the time it was
issued; a. signature of the maker or drawer usually
affixed at the lower right-hand corner of the
(d) Where there is a conflict between the
instrument. Drawee’s name is usually placed at
written and printed provisions of the
the lower left-hand corner. Holder signs at the
instrument, the written provisions prevail;
back of it.
b. ambiguous location of the signature - the SEC. 19. Signature by agent; authority; how
party who signs is considered as an indorser shown.—The signature of any party may be
who assumes the least liability, and not as a made by a duly authorized agent. No
maker or drawer. particular form of appointment is necessary for
this purpose; and the authority of the agent
8. Instruments signed by two or more persons may be established as in other cases of agency.
– Their liability may be either solidary or joint.
Signing by an authorized agent
“I promise to pay” – Solidary
The authority of the agent may be shown, as in
“We promise to pay” – Jointly other cases of agency, to have been given orally
SEC. 18. Liability of person signing in trade or or in writing subject to the provisions of the
assumed name.— No person is liable on the Statute of Frauds.
instrument whose signature does not appear SEC. 20. Liability of person signing as agent,
thereon, except as herein otherwise expressly and so forth.— Where the instrument
provided. But one who signs in a trade or contains or a person adds to his signature
assumed name will be liable to the same words indicating that he signs for or on behalf
extent as if he had signed in his own name. of a principal, or in a representative capacity,
Persons liable on an instrument he is not liable on the instrument if he was
duly authorized; but the mere addition of
1. General Rule – only persons whose words describing him as an agent, or as filling a
signatures appear on an instrument are liable representative character, without disclosing
thereon. his "principal, does not exempt him from
personal liability.
2. Exceptions –
When agent may escape personal liability
a. Where a person signs in a trade or assumed
name 1. He is duly authorized
b. The principal is liable if a duly authorized 2. He adds words to his signature indicating
agent signs on his own behalf that the signs as an agent, that is, for or on
behalf of a principal, or in a representative
c. In case of forgery, the forgery is liable even if
capacity; and
his signature does not appear on the
instrument. 3. He discloses his principal
d. Where the acceptor makes his acceptance of Disclosing the agent of principal
a bill on a separate paper
If the agent signs a note or bill in his own name
e. Where a person makes a written promise to and discloses no principal, he is personally
accept a bill before it is drawn bound, and evidence to the contrary may not be
admitted to relieve him from personal liability.
Signing in a trade or assumed name
The mere addition of descriptive words without b. Minority is not even a personal defense which
disclosing the principal will not relieve the may be set up by parties other than the minor;
signer from personal liability. but it is a real defense available to the minor.
SEC. 21. Signature by procuration; effect of.— c. A minor may be held bound by his signature
A signature by uration. "procuration" operates in an instrument where he is guilty of actual
as notice that the agent has but a limited fraud committed by specifically stating that he
authority to sign, and the principal is bound is of age when, in fact he is not.
only in ease the agent in so signing acted
within the actual limits of his authority. 2. Other incapacitated persons – insane or
demented persons and deaf-mutes who do not
Meaning of procuration know how to write
b. Forgery of the drawer’s signature, either: 2. Where note payable to bearer – the party
whose indorsement is forged is liable to a
b.1. with acceptance by the drawee; or holder in due course, but not to one who is not a
holder in due course.
b.2. without such acceptance but the
bill is paid by the drawee. 3. Where bill payable to order – the party
whose indorsement is forged is not liable to any
Extent of the effect of forgery holder, even holder in due course. – wholly
inoperative
- Not totally void but only the forged or
unauthorized signature that is declared 4. Where bill payable to bearer – drawee may
debit the drawer’s account
to be inoperative
CHAPTER 2 for value in respect to all parties who become
such prior to that time.
CONSIDERATION
What constitute a holder for value
Sec. 24. Presumption of consideration. - Every
negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie Holder for value – one who is given a valuable
to have been issued for a valuable consideration for the instrument issued or
consideration; and every person whose negotiated to him
signature appears thereon to have become a
party thereto for value. 1. The holder is deemed as such not only as
regards the party to whom value has been given
Meaning of consideration by him but also in respect to all those who
became parties prior to the time when value
- Immediate, direct and essential reason was given.
which induces a party to enter into a
contract. 2. A holder of a negotiable instrument is
presumed to be a holder for value until the
Seller – price contrary be shown by any party who claims
otherwise.
Buyer – object
Sec. 27. When lien on instrument constitutes
Presumption of consideration
holder for value. — Where the holder has a
- it is not necessary, however that lien on the instrument arising either from
consideration be expressly stated in the contract or by implication of law, he is deemed
instrument a holder for value to the extent of his lien.
- Prima facie
Where a holder has lien on instrument
Sec. 25. Value, what constitutes. — Value is
One who has taken a negotiable instrument as
any consideration sufficient to support a
collateral security for a debt has a lien on the
simple contract. An antecedent or pre-existing
instrument.
debt constitutes value; and is deemed such
whether the instrument is payable on demand 1. Amount of instrument more than debt
or at a future time. secured – the pledgee is a holder for value to
the extent of his lien – he can collect the full
Adequacy of consideration
value of the instrument and apply the same to
A valuable consideration need not be adequate. the payment of debt but he must deliver the
It is sufficient if it is a valuable one. surplus to the pledger.
- Personal defense
- A total lack of any valid consideration
whether
for the contract, in consequence of
which the alleged contract must be fail.
failure is
- Something was agreed upon as
consideration but for some cause, such
agreed consideration failed to
materialize.
ed and
instrument to a holder for value,
notwithstanding such holder, at the time of
taking the instrument, knew him to be only an
accommodation party.
amount
the accommodation party has put his name,
without consideration, for the purpose of
accommodating some party who is to use it,
and is expected to pay it. In other words, it is a
otherwise
Sec. 28. Effect of want of consideration. -
indorser, without receiving value therefor and
for the purpose of lending his name to another
party.
Absence or failure of consideration is a matter a. He usually expects that not he, but the
of defense as against any person not a holder accommodation party, will pay the bill or note
in due course; and partial failure of when it falls due. He actually lends his credit to
consideration is a defense pro tanto, whether the party to whom the accommodation is made.
the failure is an ascertained and liquidated
amount or otherwise. b. He is classified according to the
accommodated party’s status. If the
accommodated party is a maker, for example, Classes of Holders:
he is liable on the instrument to subsequent 1. Holders simply
parties as if he were the maker. 2. Holders for value
3. Accommodated party – is one in whose favor 3. Holders in due course
a person, without receiving value therefor, signs 4. HDC subrogation
an instrument for the purpose of lending his
credit and enabling said party to raise money Ordinary or Mere Holder – a person who
upon it. He impliedly agrees to take up to qualifies as a holder but does not meet all the
instrument at maturity and to indemnify the conditions to qualify as a HDC
accommodation party against the
consequences of non-payment. (1) A holder who is not a holder in due course
but derives his title from a holder in due course
Liability of accommodation party to a holder is given the rights of such prior holder.
1. Absence of consideration not a defense – by (2) The holder of a negotiable instrument is not
clear mandate, makes the accommodation necessarily the owner thereof.
party “liable on the instrument to a holder for
value notwithstanding such holder at the time Right of transferee of unindorsed instrument
of taking the instrument knew him to be only an to sue
accommodation party.”
A transferee of unindorsed instrument is
certainly not a holder.
Payee as holder in due course (2) Negotiation after maturity or dishonor – may
still be negotiated either by indorsement or by
(1) Contrary view – The holder in due course delivery to the same extent before maturity
must have acquired the instrument through
negotiation and an instrument is issued and not Holder in good faith
negotiated to a payee
(1) Meaning of good faith – honesty in fact in
(2) Affirmative view – A holder in due course is a the transaction concerned – subjective
payee and indorsee who is in possession
- refer only to the good faith of the
Drawee as holder in due course indorsee or transferee
While a payee may be a holder in due course, a (2) Meaning of bad faith – have knowledge of
drawee does not, by paying a bill, become a facts which render it dishonest
holder in due course under this section.
(3) Proof of bad faith – sufficient that such
Instrument complete and regular upon its face knowledge tends to show that there was
something wrong with the transaction
(1) Wanting in any material particular
Holder for value
(2) Alteration apparent on face of instrument
Any consideration sufficient to support a simple
- void contract is value.
Holder before instrument is overdue Holder without notice of infirmity in
instrument or defect of title
(1) Date of instrument - overdue after the date
of maturity (1) Lack of bad faith – In order to constitute
notice, the holder must have had actual or
(a) fixed
chargeable knowledge of the infirmity or defect
(b) payable on demand or must have had acted in bad faith.
(c) payable on occurrence of a specified (2) Bad faith of agent – The agent’s knowledge
event is legally deemed his principal’s knowledge, and
thus, will render the principal not a holder in
(2) Acquisition of instrument after/on date of due course
maturity
SEC. 53. When person not deemed holder in
Holder without notice of dishonor due course.— Where course an instrument
payable on demand is negotiated an
(1) Ways and time of dishonor – either by non- unreasonable length of time after its issue, the
acceptance or non-payment holder is not deemed a holder in due course.
SEC. 54. Notice before full amount paid.— Actual knowledge is usually shown by the
Where the transferee receives notice of any instrument itself.
infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title
of the person negotiating the same before he (1) Mere negligence to make inquiries not
has paid the full amount agreed to be paid sufficient
therefor, he will be deemed a holder in due
(2) Knowledge amounting to bad faith
course only to the extent of the amount
theretofore paid by him. - If the holder had actual knowledge of
suspicious circumstances, coupled with the
Effect of notice before full payment
means of readily informing himself of the facts
(1) No amount has yet been paid – no and he willingly abstained from making
obligation; not entitled to the same protection inquiries, his intentional ignorance may amount
as a holder in due course to bad faith.
(2) An amount has been paid – he can be (3) Effect of notice of defect
considered a holder in due course only to the
SEC. 57. Rights of holder in due course.— A
extent of the amount theretofore paid by him
holder in due course holds the instrument free
SEC. 55. When title defective.— The title of a from any defect of title of prior parties, and
person who negotiates an instrument is free from defenses available to prior parties
defective within the meaning of this Act when among themselves and may enforce payment
he obtained the instrument, or any signature of the instrument for the full amount thereof
thereto, by fraud, duress, or force and fear, or against all parties liable thereon.
other unlawful means, or for an illegal
Rights of a holder in due course
consideration, or when he negotiates it in
breach of faith, or under such circumstances as (1) He may sue on the instrument in his own
amount to a fraud. name
When title of a person defective (2) He may receive payment and if the payment
is in due course, the instrument is discharged
(1) in the acquisition – instrument or signature
by fraud, duress, or force or fear or other (3) He holds the instrument free from any defect
unlawful means, ore for illegal consideration of title of prior parties
(2) in the negotiation – instrument in a breach (4) He holds the instrument free from defenses
of faith, or under such circumstances as amount available to prior parties among themselves;
of fraud and
SEC. 56. What constitutes notice of defect.— (5) He may enforce payment of the instrument
To constitute notice of an infirmity in. the for the full amount thereof against all parties
instrument or defect in the title of the person liable thereon.
negotiating the same, the person to whom it is
negotiated must have had actual knowledge of Real defenses available against a holder in due
the infirmity or defect, or knowledge of such course
facts that his action in taking the instrument
amounted to had faith. - The defenses referred to in Section 57
that cannot be set up against a holder
What constitutes notice of infirmity or defect in due course are so called “personal
defense”.
- Real defenses, which attach to the - they challenge the validity of the instrument
instrument itself, would be available itself
against all persons even as against a
holder in due course. - it is only unenforceable against the party
- A holder not a holder in due course entitled to set up the defense
acquires the instrument subject to all
(2) Personal defense – available to prior parties
defenses, whether personal or real,
among themselves but which are not good
because he is treated as mere assignee
against a holder in due course
of a non-negotiable paper.
- affects only the validity of the agreement
SEC. 58. When subject to original defenses.
— In the hands of any holder other than a Examples of defenses
holder in due course, a negotiable
instrument is subject to the same defenses 1. Real defense
as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder
who derives his title through a holder in (a) Incapacity
due course, and who is not himself a party
(b) Illegality of contract when declared
to any fraud or illegality affecting the
by law
instrument, has all the rights of such
former holder in respect of all parties prior (c) Want of delivery of incomplete
to the latter. instrument
Immediate, remote, and prior parties (d) Forgery
M P (e) Want of authority, apparent and real
A (f) Duress, force and fear
B (g) Fraud in factum or fraud in esse
contractus
Immediate – M & P ; P & A ; A & B
- "Fraud in factum" and "fraud in esse
Remote – M & B
contractus" are both legal terms
Prior To B – M, P and A referring to a type of fraud that occurs
during the formation of a contract, but
Meaning of defense "fraud in factum" specifically relates to
a situation where a party is completely
- grounds or reasons pleaded or offered unaware of the nature of the document
by the defendant in a case, showing they are signing due to a
why a plaintiff, as a matter of law or misrepresentation, while "fraud in esse
fact, should not be given the relief he contractus" is a broader term
seeks. encompassing any significant deception
that occurs during the contract's
Kinds of defenses
execution, including fraud in factum.
(1) Real defense – assertable against all parties,
(h) Fraudulent alteration by holder
both immediate and remote, including HDC or
holder through the latter (i) Prescription
(j) Other infirmities appearing on the 1. Fraud in the execution or fraud in factum – a
face of the instrument person, without negligence, has signed and
instrument – real defense
(k) Discharge at or after maturity
2. Fraud in inducement or simple fraud – relates
2. Personal defense to the quality, quantity, value, or character of
the consideration of the instrument
(a) Filling of wrong date
Rights of holder not in due course
(b) Filling up the blanks not in
accordance with the authority given and within (1) He may sue on the instrument in his own
reasonable time name
(c) Want of delivery of complete (2) He may receive payment and if the payment
instrument is in due course, the instrument is discharged
(d) Absence or failure of consideration (3) He is entitled to the instrument but holds it
subject to the same defenses as if it were non-
(e) Simple fraud or fraud in inducement
negotiable; and
(f) Acquisition of instrument (not
(4) He has all the rights of the holder in due
signature) by duress, or force and fear
course from whom he derives his title in respect
(g) Acquisition of instrument by of all parties prior to such holder, provided he is
unlawful means not himself a party to any fraud or illegality
affecting the instrument.
(h) Acquisition of instrument for an
illegal consideration Rights of purchaser from a holder in due
course
(i) Negotiation in breach of faith
(1) Rights of a mere transferee
(j) Negotiation under circumstances
that amount to fraud (2) Rights of transferee from a holder in due
course
(k) Innocent alteration or spoliation
SEC. 59. Who deemed holder in due course.—
Spoliation is an alteration made Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a
by a stranger to an instrument. holder in due course; but when it shown that
the title of any person who has negotiated the
(l) set-off between immediate parties instrument was defective, the burden is on the
holder to prove that he or some person under
(m) Discharge by payment or
whom he claims acquired the title as holder in
renunciation or release before maturity
due course. But the last-mentioned rule does
(n) Discharge of party secondarily liable not apply in favor of a party who became
by discharge of prior party bound on the instrument prior to the
acquisition of such defective title.
(o) Want of authority of the agent who
has apparent authority When holder presumed a holder in due course
(3) Exception (to no. 2) – the holder has no Classification of parties according to liability
burden of proving that he is a holder in due
course in favor of a party who become bound Liability – the obligation of a party to a
on the instrument prior to the acquisition of negotiable instrument to pay the same
such defective title according to its terms
Primarily liable:
Not liable:
Liability of maker