Evaluation of Water Supply Distribution System and Hydraulic Performance of Hosanna Town
Evaluation of Water Supply Distribution System and Hydraulic Performance of Hosanna Town
ABSTRACT
This study is conducted to evaluate existing water supply distribution system of the town. The town gets
water by classifying supply system into three pressure zones. About 66% of the town is categorized under
pressure zone two and pressure zone one and three have no major problem hence, this study emphasizes on
pressure zone two. Data for distribution system was evaluated by using WaterCADv6.5 software. The per
capita domestic water consumption of Hosanna Town was found to be 42.9 l/c/d in the year 2020. The
average water loss in Hosanna Town was 40%, which shows as it needs a matter of concern. During steady
state analysis, 24% of the higher pressures in pressure zone two were observed due to low elevation and
3.96% of the lowest pressure recorded was due to high elevation. 72% of pressure zone two has pressure
within the optimum range during steady state analysis. After hydraulic analysis, 15.53% of the identified
nodes have pressure below 15m and 7.77% of nodes have pressure above 70m. Only 76.7% of the areas
have pressure within the recommended limit during peak hour consumption. During minimum hour
consumption, 1.98% of residents get water at low pressure due to high elevation of the area. 38% of the
nodes have pressure above 70 m and only 59.41% of the area has pressure within the recommended limit.
For the parts of the system that are located far away from the sources, and areas with high elevation are
facing lack of water due to low pressure. The current water demand is found to be 2470 m3/day and at the
end of design period of 2040 years, it would be 17352m3/day. In order to achieve a 15m minimum and 70m
maximum pressure, it is necessary to provide pressure controlling valve and establishing boosting station.
Finding for additional water source is also a fundamental issue to meet the current and future water
demand.
Keywords: Hydraulic performance, Simulation, Water distribution system, Water losses.
The most common challenges in water system pressures are often introduced.
distribution networks include water quality (Petingeduld and Zdeneksvitak, 2006).
degradation, capacity shortages, infrastructure
aging and deterioration, and increasing demand MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
(Jalal, 2008). Description of Study Area
In water utility systems, significant amount of Hosanna Town is capital of Hadiya Zone which
water is lost as leakage while it transport from is found in Southern Nations and Nationalities
source up to consumers. Water loss represents Regional Government Administration Region of
inefficiency in water delivery and measurement Ethiopia. Hosanna town is located between
operations in rising main and distribution 833000N and 835000N latitudes and 373000E
networks. When the productivity increased, and 374000E longitudes in UTM coordinates.
investments in new infrastructure will lead to The town is located in between 2140m and
more effective and efficient water services 2380m elevated lands above mean sea level &
(Dighade et al., 2014). 230 km away from the Country's Capital city
Because of rapid population growth and high Addis Ababa to the southern direction via
water losses from the distribution network, the Alemgena&Butajira Road.
total water demand of the system in many Population
developing countries exceeds available
Based on CSA 2007 the population census
production capacity. To limit total demand and
result, the current population of the town is
provide an equitable distribution of available
projected to 116468 at the end of 2020.
water, intermittent water supplies with reduced
Water Losses Analysis functioning for 18 hours per day, which is 41.86
% of its capacity (3715.2m3/d) if pumps work
The total designed water production capacity of
for 24 hours. Additionally, the actual average
the system is 9417.6m3/day. However, the
production of the spring is 100% (7862.4m3/d).
actual production of water has been lower than
The volume of the water supplied and billed
the expected capacity. Production data
water (consumption) for seven consecutive
computed for five boreholes shows that actual
years was shown in Figure 2.
average production of water at present from the
system is 1555.2m3/day assuming pump
Figure 2: Water production, consumption and town were only five boreholes. In year 2011 the
Loss for Hosanna Town water supply service water production was about 800,000m3 and
Total water loss or unaccounted for water from this quantity only half of it was billed
(UFW) is the difference between the volume of appropriately. In year 2012 the water production
water produced, and the volume that is billed or was reduced to 49029m3 due to pump failure,
consumed. As it is shown in figure 2, for years power shortage, and decrease yield of
2011 and 2012, source of water supply for the borehole3. The springs were added to the water
supply system in year 2013 to fill the gap percentage of water loss in the town water
between increasing water consumption and distribution system is given in Figure 3. The
water production. In year 2014, bore borehole 6 average amount of water loss was 40% and only
was added to the system and once again water 60% water was actually reached the consumers.
production was increased. After bore hole 6 According to Mckenzie et al (2006), the system
there was no additional source to the system, but efficiency is good (acceptable) if above 75% of
the pumps have been kept maintained to water produced reaches the consumer. Thus,
increase water production for the town. The Hosanna Town water supply system is not good.
In terms of material type, UPVC is the major table 4.3, 48.93% is UPVC and GI pipe is used
pipe type in distribution system. As shown in in smaller percentage 45.45%.
Table5. Distribution of pipe material types at Hosanna Town
Pipe Type Length %
HDPE 21450 45.45
UPVC 71955 48.93
DCI 32000 0.61
Water Distribution Network Simulation namely; Pressure Zone One, Pressure Zone Two
and Pressure Zone Three due to the elevation
In this study, the distribution network of the
differences in each Pressure Zones. From these
town is put in three different pressure zones,
Pressure zones, pressure Zone Two covers the
largest area of the Town’s distribution networks reservoir volume of 2000m3 from which
where it accounts about 66% of the area. In this distribution work starts.
zone water from two springs is collected to the
Figure4. Water distribution network map of Hosanna Town for pressure zone.
Pressure Distribution During Steady State low elevation and 3.96% of the lowest pressure
Simulation recorded was junction (23, 24, 27, and 87) due
to high elevation. Majority of this zone has
During steady state analysis 24% of the higher
pressure within the optimum range during
pressures in pressure zone two of town >70
steady state analysis which is 72%.
were observed at the different junctions due to
Table6. Distribution of pressure at steady state analysis
Pressure(m) Nodes %
>70 25 24
60-70 17 16.83
50-60 8 7.92
40-50 8 7.92
30-40 21 20.79
20-30 15 14.85
15-20 3 2.97
<15 4 3.96
Total 101 100
Pressure Distribution During Peak Hour consumption. The ranges of lowest pressures
Consumption recorded were from -16.937m to 13.93m during
peak hour consumption. 7.77% of nodes have
After hydraulic analysis, 15.53% of the
pressure above 70mand only 76.7% of the areas
identified nodes have pressure below 15m.
have pressure within the recommended limit (15
Particularly junctions 106, 121,104, 128, 110,
to70 m) during peak hour consumption. The
100, 44 and 103 were having negative pressures
above discussions are also summarized in table
of -28.6m, -25.3m,-21.5m, 19.7m, 12.8m, 8.7m,
7 below.
7.92m and-3.99m respectively at peak time
Table7. Distribution of pressure at peak hour consumption.
Pressure (m) Nodes %
>70 8 7.77
60-70 10 9.71
50-60 15 14.56
40-50 11 10.68
30-40 17 16.50
20-30 17 16.50
15-20 9 8.74
<15 16 15.53
Total 103 100
The pressure distribution of nodes with negative pressure at peak hour consumption is given in Figure
5 below.
Pressure Junction: J128
Pressure versus Time
70.0 J 1 04 \ P H D
65.0 J 1 06 \ P H D
J 1 21 \ P H D
60.0 J 1 28 \ P H D
55.0
50.0
45.0
40.0
35.0
Pr e s s u r e
(m H 2O )
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0
Ti me
(hr)
Figure 5:- Pressure distribution of selected their water taps. Most of residents far away from
nodes with negative pressure at peak hour reservoir site in pressure zone two cannot get
consumption. water with the required pressure head even
Households located on higher elevations site during night where maximum pressure is
gets water at low water pressure. Variations of expected in the network. The total area of low-
pressure during day and night create operational pressure head is 15.53% during peak hour
problems, resulting in increased leakage and consumption and 1.98% during minimum time
malfunctioning of water usages. The water users consumption two. Effects of distance and
located in higher elevation relative to supply elevation in pressure distribution of selected
points get less water and they fetch after users nodes are shown in Figure 6.
located in lower elevation are satisfied or close
within the recommended limit (15m to70 m) summarized in Table 4.7 and its detail self-
during minimum consumption. The results for explanatory table is put in appendix A4 andA5
pressure during minimum hour consumption is
0 .8
V e lo city
(m /s)
0 .6
0 .4
0 .2
0 .0
0 .0 3 .0 6 .0 9 .0 1 2 .0 1 5 .0 1 8 .0 2 1 .0 2 4 .0
Time
(h r)
[20] Korkeakoski (2006) A guide to sanitation and [32] Rossman, Boulos & Altman (2003) The discrete
hygiene for those working in developing countries volume element method for modeling water quality
global dry toilet club. in pipe networks, journal of water resources
[21] Maher Abu-Madi &Trifunovic (2012) Impacts of planning and management. 119, 56-67.
supply duration on the design and performance of [33] Sharma, (2008) Performance indicators of water
intermittent distribution systems in West Bank. losses in distribution: Delft, the Netherlands.
journal of water international, 38, 263-282. [34] Tabesh & Dolatkhahi (2006) Effect of pressure
[22] Mckenzi, Hamilton & Seago (2006) A review of dependent analysis on water quality performance
performance indicators for real losses from water assessment of distribution network. Iranian Journal
supply systems. of Science & Technology.
[23] Misirdali (2003) A methodology for calculating [35] 30, 119-127.
hydraulic system reliability of water distribution [36] Tabesh, Jamasb & Moeini (2011) Calibration of
networks wtaer distribution hydraulic model. A comparation
[24] Motiee, Emcbean & Amotiei (2007) Estimating between pressure dependent and demand driven
physical unaccounted for water (UFW) in analaysis. Urban water journal, 8, 93-102.
distribution networks using simulation models and [37] Tamminen, Ramos & Covas (2008) water supply
GIS. Urban Water Journal, 4, 43-42. system performance for different pipe materials
[25] MOWE (2011) Urban Water Supply Universal part i. water quality analysis, 8.
Access Plan PART III (2011-2015), Addis Ababa, [38] Totsuka, Trifunovic & Vairavamoorthy (2004)
Ethiopia. intermittent urban water supply under water
[26] MOWIE (2015) Second Growth and starving situations.
Transformation National Plan for the Water [39] Utkarshnigam, kaoustubhtiwari & darshanmehta
Supply and Sanitation Sub-sector. (2015) water distribution network re-design for
[27] MOWR (2006a) Universal Access Program for Svnit Surat campus. International Journal of
Water Supply and Sanitation Services 2006 to Advance Research in Engineering, Science &
2012, International Calendar (1999 to 2005 Technolo2, 3.
Ethiopian Calendar). [40] Wallingford (2003) Hand book for assessment of
[28] MOWR (2006b) Urban Water Supply Design cachment water demand and use.
Criteria. Water Resources Administration Urban [41] Volume I statistical report of CSA, (1998)
Water Supply and Sanitation Department.
[42] (WHO (2002) Health systems: improving
[29] Muranho, Ferreira, Gomes & Marques (2013) performance. Geneva, Switzerland
Technical performance evaluation of water
[43] Wonduante (2013) Assessing the challenges of
distribution networks based on EPANET. 12th
sustainable water supply in Gonder Town. MSc
International Conference on Computing and
thesis, Addis Ababa University.
Control for the Water Industry.
[44] Zyoud (2003) Hydraulic performance of
[30] Petingeduld & Zdeneksvitak (2006) Modellng
Palestinian water distribution system. Nablus,
intermittent water supply systems with EPANET.
AnNajah National University.
[31] Rao (2002) A guide to sanitation and hygiene for
those working in developing countries global dry
toilet club.
Citation: Amanuel Adane Anore. “Evaluation of Water Supply Distribution System and Hydraulic
Performance of Hosanna Town” International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering and
Technology, 7(6), 2020, pp. 18-28.
Copyright: © 2020 Amanuel Adane Anore. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.