0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views11 pages

Week 2

Professor Chatterjee's Week 2 lectures cover consumer wants and quantitative analysis, focusing on concepts like need, want, desire, and demand, as well as methods for understanding customer preferences through surveys and conjoint analysis. Key findings highlight the importance of value for money in hotel ratings and the impact of co-traveler type and time distance on satisfaction. The lectures also introduce choice modeling techniques, including logistic regression and choice-based conjoint analysis, emphasizing their applications in predicting consumer behavior and market share.

Uploaded by

dushyant1209garg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views11 pages

Week 2

Professor Chatterjee's Week 2 lectures cover consumer wants and quantitative analysis, focusing on concepts like need, want, desire, and demand, as well as methods for understanding customer preferences through surveys and conjoint analysis. Key findings highlight the importance of value for money in hotel ratings and the impact of co-traveler type and time distance on satisfaction. The lectures also introduce choice modeling techniques, including logistic regression and choice-based conjoint analysis, emphasizing their applications in predicting consumer behavior and market share.

Uploaded by

dushyant1209garg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

WEEK 2

Here are the notes summarizing the key points from Professor Chatterjee's lecture (Week 2,
Session 1):

Topic: What Consumers Want - Introduction and Quantitative Analysis

Key Concepts:

Need, Want, Desire, Demand: Understanding the differences is crucial for marketers.
Need: Basic necessities for survival.
Want: Higher-level desires beyond basic needs.
Desire: A specific want.
Demand: Desire backed by willingness to pay.
Sources of Information on Customer Wants:
Directly asking customers: Surveys (qualitative and quantitative).
Review websites: (Amazon, TripAdvisor) - analyze customer reviews.
Complaint websites: (ConsumerComplaints.com) - understand negative feedback.
Online forums: (Salesforce.com, etc.) - user discussions and recommendations.
Tracking customer behavior: Choice models (binomial, multinomial).
Consumer experiments: Conjoint analysis (creating scenarios and asking for
preferences).

R Code and Analysis:

1. Data Preparation (Review from previous week):


Set working directory, load data ( read.csv() ).
Handle missing values and outliers.
2. Scaling Variables:
scale() : Standardizes the dependent (overall rating) and independent (aspect ratings)
variables. This makes them comparable in the regression.
3. Regression Analysis:
lm() : Linear regression to determine the relative importance of hotel aspects on overall
rating.
Example: fit <- lm(review_overall_rating ~ rating_value + rating_location +
..., data = Data)
Interpreting Results:
F-statistic and p-value: Assess overall model significance.
Adjusted R-squared: Explains the variance in the overall rating.
Coefficients: Show the impact of each aspect on the overall rating.
4. Impact of Co-traveler Type:
Include review_type in the regression model.
R automatically creates dummy variables.
Interpretation: The coefficients for different review_type levels (business, solo, family,
friends) are compared to the dropped level (as a couple).
5. Impact of Time Distance (between travel and review):
Convert date of review and month of visit to date format using as.Date() .
Handle different date formats (e.g., "dd-mm-yyyy" vs. "mm/dd/yyyy").
Calculate the time difference.
Include the time difference variable in the regression model.
Interpretation: A significant coefficient suggests that the time between travel and review
affects overall satisfaction.

Key Findings (from the example):

Value for Money is the most important factor influencing overall hotel rating.
Business and Family travelers tend to have lower satisfaction scores compared to
couples.
The time distance between travel and review can significantly impact the rating.

Future Topics (Mentioned):

Choice modeling (binomial, multinomial).


Conjoint analysis.
Text mining of reviews.

Important Note: The professor emphasizes the importance of understanding basic statistics,
marketing management, and introductory business analytics.

Here are the short and most important notes from Professor Chatterjee's lecture (Week 2,
Session 2):

Topic: What Consumers Want - Conjoint Analysis Introduction

Key Concept: Conjoint Analysis (or "Features CONsidered JOINTly")


Goal: Identify what attributes and attribute levels consumers value and how they make
trade-offs.
Principle: Break down offerings into combinations of multiple attributes and assess
customer preferences for these combinations.
Consumer Surplus: Customers aim to maximize the difference between the perceived
value (utility) of a product and its price (Value - Price).

Challenges in Understanding Customer Value & Pricing:

Increasing Value vs. Increasing Price: Higher value often means higher cost, potentially
leading to higher prices and lower demand.
Finding the "Right Price": Balancing customer willingness to pay with profitability.

Limitations of Classical Market Research:

Direct Questions: Can yield vague and non-actionable answers.


Importance Ratings/Rankings: Don't reveal how consumers make trade-offs between
different attribute levels.

Conjoint Analysis Steps:

1. Define the Product/Service: The focus of the analysis (e.g., laptop, smartphone).
2. Select Attributes and Levels:
Independent Attributes: Attributes should not be highly correlated.
Varying Levels: Each attribute must have multiple distinct levels.
Unambiguous Levels: Levels should be clear and specific (e.g., brand names, specific
RAM sizes, concrete prices).
Mutually Exclusive Levels: A single option cannot possess multiple levels of the same
attribute simultaneously.
Balanced Levels (Ideally): Similar number of levels across attributes.
3. Create Combinations (Profiles): Generate meaningful combinations of the attribute levels.
The number of combinations increases rapidly with more attributes and levels.
4. Collect Preference Data:
Ranking-based: Respondents rank the combinations from most to least preferred.
Rating-based: Respondents rate each combination on a scale.
Choice-based: Respondents choose their most preferred option from a set of
combinations.
5. Analyze Data: Use statistical techniques (to be discussed in the next video) to determine
the part-worth utilities (value) of each attribute level.
6. Interpret Results: Understand customer preferences, estimate willingness to pay, predict
market share for new products, and optimize product positioning.

Example (Laptop):

Attributes: Brand, Processor, RAM Size, Monitor Size, Price.


Levels: Specific brand names (HP, Lenovo, Dell), processor speeds (e.g., 2 GHz, 3 GHz),
RAM (e.g., 8GB, 16GB), screen sizes (e.g., 14 inch, 15.6 inch), prices (e.g., $500, $700).

Key Takeaway: Conjoint analysis is a powerful technique to understand how consumers value
different product features jointly and make trade-offs, providing more actionable insights than
traditional methods. The next session will focus on the analysis techniques.

Here are the short and most important notes from Professor Chatterjee's lecture (Week 2,
Session 3):

Topic: What Consumers Want - Conjoint Analysis Hands-on

Key Concepts:

Orthogonal Design: A subset of all possible combinations (full factorial design) used to
reduce the number of choices presented to respondents. In an orthogonal design, the
attributes are uncorrelated.
Rating-based Conjoint Analysis: Respondents rate each product profile (combination of
attribute levels) on a scale.
Ranking-based Conjoint Analysis: Respondents rank the product profiles in order of
preference.
Choice-based Conjoint Analysis: Respondents choose their most preferred product
profile from a set of options.
Reverse Coding: In ranking-based conjoint analysis, ranks are reversed (e.g., 1 becomes
the highest rating, and the highest rank becomes the lowest rating).
Part-worth Utilities (Inferred Preferences): The relative value a consumer places on each
level of each attribute, derived from the conjoint analysis.
Importance Scores: The relative importance of each attribute, calculated from the range of
part-worth utilities for that attribute.

R Code and Analysis:

1. Data Preparation:
Load the data ( read.csv() ).
Convert the categorical variables (fuel, capacity, price) to factors ( factor() ).
2. Regression Analysis:
Use linear regression ( lm() ) to model the relationship between the product profile
attributes and the rating.
The regression coefficients indicate the part-worth utilities.
3. Interpreting Regression Results:
Assess model fit (F-statistic, p-value, adjusted R-squared).
The coefficients show how each attribute level affects the rating.
4. Calculating Attribute Importance:
For each attribute, calculate the range between the highest and lowest part-worth
utilities.
Normalize these ranges to sum to 1 (or 100%) to get the relative importance scores.

Applications of Conjoint Analysis:

Pricing Decisions:
Estimate the impact of attribute level changes on preference.
Use the regression coefficients to determine the price that compensates for a change
in an attribute level.
Alternatively, directly ask for willingness to pay.

Example (Car):

Attributes: Fuel Type (Diesel, Petrol, CNG), Capacity (8-seater, 6-seater, 4-seater), Price
(12 lakhs, 8 lakhs, 4 lakhs).
The analysis determines the relative importance of these attributes, the part-worth utilities
for each level, and how price changes might compensate for changes in other attributes.

Key Takeaways:

Conjoint analysis provides valuable insights into customer preferences for different product
features.
It allows for the quantification of the value customers place on specific attribute levels.
The results can be used to inform product design, pricing, and marketing strategies.
R is used to run the analysis.

Here are the short and most important notes from Professor Chatterjee's lecture (Week 2,
Session 4):
Topic: What Consumers Want - Conjoint Analysis Applications Continued

Key Applications of Conjoint Analysis:

1. Brand Premium:
The extra amount consumers are willing to pay for a branded product over a non-
branded one, keeping all other attributes constant.
Can be directly estimated if "Brand" is included as an attribute in the conjoint study,
especially if willingness to pay is the response variable.
The difference in part-worth utilities (or willingness to pay) between different brand
levels represents the brand premium.
2. Market Share Modeling:
Predict the market share of different product configurations based on consumer
preferences derived from conjoint analysis.
Assumptions:
Utility is related to the rating (e.g., Utility = Rating^alpha).
Probability of choosing a product is the utility of that product divided by the sum of
utilities of all available products (for all i).
Steps:
Calculate the predicted utility (based on the regression equation from conjoint
analysis) for each competitive product.
Use an alpha parameter to transform utility (rating).
Calculate predicted market share based on the formula.
Optimize the alpha parameter (e.g., using Solver) to minimize the difference
between predicted and actual market shares (RMSE).
Once a good alpha is found, the model can be used to predict the market share of
new product introductions.
3. New Product Introduction:
Evaluate the potential market share of different new product configurations before
launch.
Calculate the predicted utility and market share for various potential product offerings
using the calibrated market share model.
This helps in deciding which new product configuration has the highest potential for
success (highest predicted demand).
Consider cost and profitability in addition to market share for the final decision.

Other Types of Conjoint Analysis (Briefly Mentioned):

Choice-Based Conjoint (CBC):


Respondents are presented with sets of product profiles (typically 3-4) and asked to
choose the one they prefer most.
The dependent variable is the choice made (categorical).
Analyzed using conditional logit or similar choice models (to be discussed in the next
video).
Adaptive/Hybrid Conjoint:
The product profiles presented to respondents are adapted based on their previous
responses.
Aims to efficiently identify the most important attributes and fine-tune preferences for
specific levels.
Particularly useful in online environments where the process can be automated.

Key Takeaways:

Conjoint analysis has diverse applications beyond just understanding feature preferences.
It can be used to quantify brand value and predict market outcomes.
Market share modeling involves an additional step of calibration using actual market data.
Different types of conjoint analysis cater to different research objectives and data collection
methods.

Here are the short and most important notes from Professor Chatterjee's lecture (Week 2,
Session 5):

Topic: Choice Modeling - Binomial Choice (Yes/No)

Key Concepts:

Choice Modeling: Quantitatively modeling how customers make choices. This session
focuses on binomial choice (buy/don't buy, switch/don't switch).
Mobile Number Porting: The example used in this session, where customers can switch
service providers while keeping their phone number.
Switching Barriers: Factors that hinder customers from switching service providers.
Economic: Financial costs associated with switching (e.g., losing prepaid balance).
Social and Psychological: Habit, loyalty, and relationships with other users on the
same network.
Procedural: Difficulty and complexity of the switching process.
Option-related: Availability and attractiveness of alternative service providers.
Generalized Linear Model (GLM): A flexible framework for modeling various types of
response variables. Here, it is used for logistic regression.
Logistic Regression: A statistical method used to model the probability of a binary
outcome (e.g., switch/don't switch).
Covariates: Control variables included in the model that are not the primary focus of the
analysis.
Model Objectives:
Explanation: Understanding the relationships between predictor variables (e.g., price,
service quality) and the outcome.
Prediction: Accurately predicting the outcome (e.g., whether a customer will switch).
Training and Testing Data: When the objective is prediction, the data is split into two sets:
Training Data: Used to build the model.
Testing Data: Used to evaluate the model's predictive performance.
Stepwise Regression: A method to select the best set of predictor variables for a model
(often used in prediction).
Confusion Matrix: A table that summarizes the performance of a classification model (e.g.,
predicted vs. actual switching behavior).
Overall Accuracy: The percentage of cases that the model correctly predicts.

R Code and Analysis:

1. Data Preparation:
Load the data ( read.csv() ).
Convert relevant columns to appropriate data types (e.g., factors).
2. Model Building (Logistic Regression):
Use glm() with family = binomial(link = "logit") to perform logistic regression.
Specify the outcome variable (switching behavior) and predictor variables (service
quality, price, switching barriers, etc.).
Include covariates if necessary.
3. Model Interpretation (for Explanation):
Examine the coefficients of the predictor variables to understand their impact on the
probability of switching.
Consider the meaning of dummy variables for categorical predictors.
4. Model Evaluation (for Prediction):
Split the data into training and testing sets.
Build the model using the training data.
Use predict() to generate predictions on the testing data.
Create a confusion matrix to assess the model's accuracy.
Key Takeaways:

Choice modeling, specifically logistic regression, can be used to understand and predict
customer switching behavior.
Factors like price, service quality, and switching barriers influence switching decisions.
The approach differs depending on whether the goal is explanation or prediction.
The next video will discuss choice-based conjoint analysis.

Here are the short and most important notes from Professor Chatterjee's lecture (Week 2,
Session 6):

Topic: Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

Key Concepts:

Cognitive Load: Choice-based conjoint reduces the cognitive effort required from
respondents compared to ranking or rating many options.
Choice Sets: Respondents are presented with a limited set of product profiles (typically 3-
4) and asked to choose their most preferred option.
No Choice Option: Allowing respondents to indicate that they would not choose any of the
presented options.
Multiple Held-Constant Alternatives: Including certain fixed options across different
choice sets.
Mimics Real World: Choice-based conjoint mirrors the actual consumer decision-making
process involving awareness sets, consideration sets, and choice sets.
Investigates Interactions: Can capture how different attribute levels jointly influence
choice.
Alternative Specific Effects: Can account for unique preferences related to specific
alternatives.
Larger Sample Size: Requires more respondents compared to rating-based or ranking-
based conjoint to obtain sufficient data points.
Less Attribute Ideal: Too many attributes can lead to heuristic-based responses (shortcuts
in decision-making).
Complex Analysis: The analytical methods are more sophisticated than simple linear
regression (e.g., conditional logit).

Conditional Logit:

The primary analytical technique for choice-based conjoint.


Models the probability of choosing a specific option from a choice set, conditional on the
attributes of all options within that set.
Formula: (P(\text{choose } j | \text{choice set } k) = \frac{e^{Uj}}{\sum{m \in k} e^{U_m}}),
where (U) represents the utility of each option.
Mimics logistic regression when the choice set has only two options (choose vs. not
choose).

Case Study: Healthcare Choices of Urban Slum Dwellers:

Attributes and Levels: Distance (≤5km, >5km), Reputation (Low, High), Delivery Method
(Telemedicine, Face-to-face), Payment (Upfront, Non-upfront), Price (Low, High).
Data Collection: 303 respondents, each presented with 8 choice sets of 4 options.
Analysis: Conditional logit was used to determine the influence of each attribute level on
healthcare choices.
Key Findings (Direct Effects):
Shorter distance, higher reputation, telemedicine (slight preference), upfront payment,
and lower price increased the likelihood of choosing a healthcare option.
Reputation and price were the most influential factors.
Interaction Effects (with Gender and Health Insurance):
Male respondents were less sensitive to distance compared to female respondents.
Male respondents and those with health insurance were less sensitive to price.
The effect of health insurance on price sensitivity needs further investigation due to the
small sample size of insured individuals.
Other Findings (from the actual paper):
Individuals with bank accounts were less sensitive to price and distance and preferred
reputed doctors.
Availability of local ambulance facilities reduced price and distance sensitivity and
increased preference for face-to-face interactions and EMI payments.

Key Takeaways:

Choice-based conjoint provides a more realistic assessment of consumer preferences by


presenting choices as they occur in the real world.
Conditional logit is the primary statistical method for analyzing choice data.
Interaction effects can reveal how preferences for certain attribute levels vary across
different consumer segments.
Conjoint analysis can inform the design of new products and services, even for specific and
vulnerable populations.

You might also like