Finals Anskey
Finals Anskey
Manila
1. Royal Mining is a VAT-registered domestic mining entity. One of its products is gold being sold to
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. It filed a claim with the BIR for tax refund on the ground that under
Section 106 of the NIRC, sales of precious metal to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas are considered export
sales subject to zero-rated VAT. Is Royal Mining’s claim for refund meritorious?
a. Yes, sale of precious gold to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas are deemed zero-rated transactions.
b. Yes, sale of precious gold to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is deemed an export sale
hence, input thereon may be credited or refunded.
c. No, sale of gold to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is exempt, hence, input is deemed
expense and cannot be refunded.
d. No, sale of gold to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is vatable hence inputs are creditable not refundable.
2. Congress enacts a law imposing a 5% tax on gross receipts of common carriers. The law does not
define the term “gross receipts”. Express Transport, Inc., bus company plying the Manila Baguio
route, has time deposits with ABC Bank. In 2005, Express Transport earned P1 million interest, after
deducting the 20% final withholding tax from its time deposits with the bank. The BIR wants to
collect a 5 % gross receipts tax on the interest income of Express Transport without deducting the 20
% final withholding tax. Is the BIR correct?
a. Yes, gross receipts mean cash collected whether actually or constructively without any deductions.
b. Yes, gross receipts mean all cash collection actually received without any deductions.
c. No, gross receipts mean actual receipts after deducting withholding tax.
d. No, gross receipts mean actual receipts derived from actual business operation.
3. Lily’s Fashion, Inc. is a VAT-registered garment manufacturer located and registered as a Subic
Bay Freeport Enterprise under Republic Act No. 7227 and an exclusive exporter. During its
operations, it purchased various supplies and materials necessary in the conduct of its
manufacturing business. The suppliers of these goods shifted to Lily’s Fashion, Inc. the 12% VAT
on the purchased items amounting to P500,000.00.
What is the proper remedy of Lily’s Fashion Inc.?
a. Lily’s Fashion Inc., may use the P500,000 as tax credit;
b. Lily’s Fashion Inc., may ask for a refund of the P500,000;
c. Lily’s Fashion Inc., may convert the P500,000 into tax warrants;
d. Lily’s Fashion Inc., may charge it to cost or expense.
4. The Commissioner or his authorized representative is empowered to suspend the business
operations and temporarily close the business establishment of any person for:
a. Failure to issue receipts or invoices of a VAT-registered entity.
b. Failure to file a VAT-return for VAT-registered person as required by the tax code.
c. Understatement of taxable sales or receipts by thirty percent (30%) or more of his correct
taxable sales or receipts for the taxable quarter
d. All of the above
5. 1st Statement: Excise taxes imposed and based on weight or volume capacity or any other
physical unit of measurement shall be referred to as ad valorem tax.
2nd Statement: Excise taxes imposed and based on selling price or other specified value of the good
shall be referred to as specific tax.
6. Mr. C is a manufacturer of fermented liquors. In making sales, all taxes on the products and
transactions are passed on to the buyers. For purposes of the value-added tax, which of the three
taxes mentioned here that forms part of the gross selling price?
7. DST corporation bought a land at P56,000,000 using its original shares of stock as payment
thereof. How much documentary stamp tax will DST corporation pay if it was agreed that
Documentary Stamp Tax will be shouldered by DST corporation?
a. P840,000
b. P560,000
c. P1,400,000
d. None of the above
8. Mr. Eugenio challenge the assessment of the BIR stating that he never received a copy of the
Letter of Authority from the BIR. The BIR proved that the security guard of Mr. Eugenio
received and acknowledged the receipt of the Letter of Authority by the BIR. Is the assessment
of the BIR valid?
a. No. The Letter of Authority must be served to Mr. Eugenio’s known business address and
in his absence to his clerk.
b. No. The Letter of Authority must be personally served to Mr. Eugenio.
c. Yes. The Letter of Authority is constructively served to Mr. Eugenio.
d. Yes. The Letter of Authority is properly served to Mr. Eugenio through his security guard.
10.CDE Corporation filed its income tax return for the calendar year 2023 on April 10, 2024. The
return was not false or fraudulent, the last day for the BIR to assess is
a. April 10, 2027 c. April 10, 2029
b. April 15, 2027 d. April 15, 2029
11. Using the preceding number, if assessment was made on April 10, 2027, the last day to collect is
a. April 10, 2030 c. April 10, 2032
b. April 15, 2020 d. April 15, 2032
12.The Commissioner of Internal Revenue may compromise the payment of any internal
revenue tax when
I. A reasonable doubt as to the validity of the claim against the taxpayer exists
II. The tax or any portion thereof appears to be unjustly or excessively assessed.
III. The financial position of the taxpayer demonstrates a clear inability to pay the assessed tax.
13. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue may abate or cancel the tax liability when
I. The administration and collection costs involved do not justify the collection of the amount due
II. A reasonable doubt as to the validity of the claim against the taxpayer exists
III. The tax or any portion thereof appears to be unjustly or excessively assessed
IV. The financial position of the taxpayer demonstrates a clear inability to pay the assessed tax.
17.In filing a protest with the Bureau of Internal Revenue, what remedies may be availed by the taxpayer simultaneously?
a. Reinvestigation or abatement;
b. Reinvestigation or compromise;
c. Reinvestigation or reconsideration;
d. Reinvestigation or review.
19.Taxpayers are required to maintain records of its book of accounts from the time it filed its return pertaining to a taxable
period:
a. 3 years therefrom;
b. 5 years therefrom;
c. 10 years therefrom;
d. 15 years therefrom;
20.Which of the following is not a proper way to deliver a final assessment notice?
a. Registered Mail; c. Substituted Service;
c. Electronic messaging; d. Personal Service.
23.1st statement: Sale of shares of stock for less than adequate and full consideration may result in a donor’s tax and income tax.
2nd statement: A donation may be exempt from donor’s tax but not necessarily a deduction from the donor’s gross income.
a. Only the 1st statement is correct.
b. Only the second statement is correct.
c. Both statements are correct.
d. Both are incorrect.
26-28)
In 2023, Jerald Geneva, resident citizen, married, general manager of Atlasan Company, received the following from his employer –
(a) Form 2307 (1st and 2nd Q) from San Miguel Corporation
(b) Form 2316 from IKBI Enterprises
(c) Form 2316 from Nina Cao Company.
29.Compute her 1st Quarterly income tax payable/(overpayment) if she chooses the OSD.
a. ₱(43,500)
b. ₱553,597
c. ₱ 16,500
d. None of the above.
33.After showing her your computations, she asked you if she could avail of the 8% tax instead. What would be your response?
a. Yes she can because her total revenues from her professional services do not exceed ₱3,000,000.
b. No. She cannot because she is VAT-registered.
c. It depends on what option she chose in the 1st Quarterly ITR.
d. None of the above
34. Statement 1: Revenue regulations (RRs) are issuances signed by the Secretary of Finance upon recommendation of the CIR.
Statement 2:Revenue memorandum circulars (RMCs) and revenue memorandum orders (RMOs) are issuances
signed by the CIR.
a. All are true.
b. All are false.
c. Only Statement 1 is true.
d. Only Statement 2 is true.
35. The following are establishments which grant sales discounts to senior citizens and PWDs on their sale of goods and/or services. Which is/are the
EXCEPTION(s)?
a. A and C
b. B and C
c. B and E
d. E only
e. None of
the above
36-37) Sagrado Realty sold a residential lot on January 1, 2022 for ₱9,000,000 exclusive of VAT. Down payment of ₱1,200,000 was received in 2022.
The balance will be collected in 4 equal instalments of ₱1,950,000 each in 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026.The zonal value of the lot is ₱10,000,000 on
January 1, 2022.
38-39) The records of ABC Corporation, organized in 2007 showed the following data for 2017.
Gross Income P2,000,000
Less: Allowable business expenses (other than bad debts) P1,850,000
Bad debts written off 100,000 1,950,000
Taxable net income P 50,000
In 2018, 80% of the bad debts written off in 2017 was collected 100,000
40-41). Bobby, lessor, leased a lot to Christina, lessee, for 15 years beginning January 1, 2016, subject to the following terms of and conditions:
Monthly rental ₱ 20,000
Advance rental for 2 years 480,000
Security deposit 240,000
Annual RPT to be paid by lessee 10,000
40. Determine the taxable income of lessor Bobby for year 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
(a) Under the Outright Method.
a. 490,000; 10,000 ; 3,050,000 ; 250,000
b. 490,000; 490,000; 3,050,000; 250,000
c. 490,000; 10,000; 10,000; 250,000
d. None of the above
41. In number 40, determine the deductible expense of Cristina, lessee, for 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
a. 250,000; 250,000; 362,000; 474,000
b. 250,000; 350,000; 474,000; 474,000
c. 250,000; 250,000; 362,000; 362,000
d. None of the above
42. Daryllson, dedicated and honest employee of ABC Corp. for the past 20 years was advised that he is to be retrenched
as the company was losing heavily but that he would be given the separation pay provided by law. To avoid
implication of inefficiency. A was advised to file a letter of resignation instead of being retrenched. If A files a
letter of resignation and receives the separation pay, such amount is
a. Taxable in full
b. Partly taxable, partly exempt
c. Exempt from income tax
d. Subject to final tax
43. Using the preceding number, if Daryllson is retrenched and receives the separation pay, such amount is
a. Taxable in full
b. Partly taxable, partly exempt
c. Exempt from income tax
d. Subject to final tax
44. Oliver is engaged in the marketing of cars. When Oliver’s son got married to the daughter of a senator, he gave the newly-wedded couple a brand
new car worth P800,000 as a wedding gift. The value of the car is
a. taxable income to the newly-wedded couple
b. Deductible expense of A
c. Not taxable income to the newly-wedded couple
d. Taxable income to the couple and deductible expense of A
45. Statement 1: Income derived from investments in the Philippines in loans, stocks, bonds or other domestic securities, or from interest on deposits in
banks in the Philippines, including sale of investments, by foreign governments and financial institution wholly-owned, controlled, or enjoying
financing from foreign government, shall be exempt from income tax, and consequently from withholding tax.
Statement 2: Gains realized from the sale or exchange or retirement of bonds, debentures, or other
certificates of indebtedness with a maturity of at least 5 years, shall not be taxable to the investor-seller.
46. Mike Reyes has been an employee of Matatag Steelworks Inc for the last 25 years. His employer set up a BIR
approved private benefit plan primarily for retirement payments to its retiring employees. His employer also set up a trust fund for the exclusive
benefit of its employees and to which the employees can make contributions. So far, Mike has contributed a total of P40,000 to this trust fund. When
he retired at age 55, he received the following amounts from his employer:
(1) P125,000 representing his retirement benefits and which was paid out of the BIR approved benefit plan, and
(2) a dividend of P140,000 from the trust fund.
47. In its first year, a domestic corporation did not derive any income nor any gain as it had not yet started commercial operations in said year.
However, it was assessed a deficiency tax by the BIR. The BIR found that the corporation overstated its pre-operating expenses, some of which were
unsubstantiated. Should such disallowed expenses give rise to income tax?
a. Yes. The fact that pre-operating expenses were overstated should give rise to a penalty in the form of income tax thereon.
b. No. Income tax cannot be imposed in the absence of any gain or profit which is realized or received, actually or constructively.
c. No. Assuming that the disallowance of the pre-operating expenses was proper, no income tax may result therefrom because the taxpayer did
not benefit from the deduction of the disallowed expenses.
d. (B) and (C)
48. Mr. Allan Bautista is engaged in the business of buying and selling of used cars. In the taxable year, he sold a used car to his first cousin thereby
incurring a loss of ₱50,000. Allan’s acquisition cost of the car was ₱100,000. Can Allan deduct the loss in his ITR in computing his income tax
payable?
a) No. The loss is a personal, and not connected with his business.
b) No. The loss is connected with his business, but the loss is between related parties under Section 36 (B) of the Tax Code.
c) Yes. The loss is a capital loss which can be offset against capital gains that are includible in the ITR.
d) Yes. The loss is connected with his business, and is not between related parties.
49. ABC is a domestic corporation engaged in the merchandising business. For the calendar year 2021, it had a net income per books of
P500,000, after considering, among others, the following:
50. Statement 1: Under Sec. 34(L) of the Tax Code, as amended by R.A. No. 10963 (TRAIN), a general professional partnership
and the partners comprising such partnership may avail of the OSD only once, either by the GPP or the partners comprising the
partnership.
Statement 2: The partners of a GPP may avail either the Itemized Deductions or the OSD against their distributive shares IF the
basis of such distributive share is the GPP’s gross income, and not its net income. This means that the GPP does not avail either of
the Itemized Deductions nor of the OSD in computing the basis of the distributive shares of the partners.
Tax withheld by customers/clients during first 3 quarters (BIR Form 2307) 90,000
Tax withheld by customers/clients in 4th Quarter (BIR Form 2307) 30,000
(b) How much is the corporation’s total gross sales, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱25,550,000; Part IV, Item 27
(B) ₱12,100,000; Part IV, Item 33
(C) ₱8,187,000; Part IV, Item 37
(D) ₱242,000; Part IV, Item 42
(c) How much is the corporation’s total gross taxable income, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱25,550,000; Part IV, Item 27
(B) ₱12,100,000; Part IV, Item 33
(C) ₱8,187,000; Part IV, Item 37
(D) ₱242,000; Part IV, Item 42
(d) How much is the corporation’s total allowable deductions, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱25,550,000; Part IV, Item 27
(B) ₱12,100,000; Part IV, Item 33
(C) ₱8,187,000; Part IV, Item 37
(D) ₱242,000; Part IV, Item 42
(e) How much is the corporation’s net taxable income, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱3,913,000; Part IV, Item 39
(B) ₱1,173,900; Part IV, Items 41 and 43; Part II, Item 14
(C) ₱1,104,900; Part IV, Item 55; Part II, Item 15
(D) ₱69,000; Part IV, Item 56; Part II, Item 16
(f) How much is the corporation’s RCIT, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱3,913,000; Part IV, Item 39
(B) ₱978,250; Part IV, Items 41 and 43; Part II, Item 14
(C) ₱1,104,900; Part IV, Item 55; Part II, Item 15
(D) ₱69,000; Part IV, Item 56; Part II, Item 16
(g) How much is the corporation’s MCIT, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱25,550,000; Part IV, Item 27
(B) ₱12,100,000; Part IV, Item 33
(C) ₱8,187,000; Part IV, Item 37
(D) ₱121,000; Part IV, Item 42
(h) How much is the corporation’s total available credits, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱3,913,000; Part IV, Item 39
(B) ₱1,173,900; Part IV, Items 41 and 43; Part II, Item 14
(C) ₱809,250; Part IV, Item 55; Part II, Item 15
(D) ₱69,000; Part IV, Item 56; Part II, Item 16
(i) How much is the corporation’s income tax payable, and where will it be indicated in the annual ITR?
(A) ₱3,913,000; Part IV, Item 39
(B) ₱1,173,900; Part IV, Items 41 and 43; Part II, Item 14
(C) ₱1,104,900; Part IV, Item 55; Part II, Item 15
(D) ₱169,000; Part IV, Item 56; Part II, Item 16
52. I. The point on which a tax is originally imposed is impact of taxation.
II. The point on which a tax burden finally rests or settles down is incidence of taxation.
III. Police power is superior to the non-impairment clause of the constitution.
IV. Power of taxation is not superior to the non-impairment clause of the constitution
a. All true
b. All false
c. Half true
d. None of the above
55. I. There can only be a tax if there is a law imposing the tax.
II. The power to tax includes the power to destroy.
a. True, true
b. True, false
c. False, true
d. False, false
56. I. Due process of law in taxation under the constitution is a grant of power.
II. Provisions in the Philippine constitution on taxation are grants of power.
III. There may be double taxation in the Philippines.
IV. Taxation may be used to implement the police power of the state.
58. A system of taxation where the amount of revenue from indirect taxes is more than the direct
taxes is
a. Progressive
b. Regressive
c. Proportional
d. Schedular
59. Which theory in taxation states that without taxes, a government would be paralyzed for lack of
power to activate and operate it, resulting in its destruction?
60. An example of a tax where the concept of progressivity finds application is the
a. Graduated income tax rates on individuals
b. Excise tax on petroleum products
c. Value-added tax on certain articles
d. Amusement tax on boxing exhibitions
61. The power to tax is the power to destroy. Is this always so?
a. No. The Executive Branch may decide not to enforce a tax law which it believes to be confiscatory.
b. Yes. The tax collectors should enforce a tax law even if it results to the destruction of the property rights of the taxpayer.
c. Yes. The tax laws should always be enforced because without taxes the very existence of the State is endangered.
d. No. The Supreme Court may nullify a tax law, hence, property rights are not affected.
68.Mr. Compton sells shoes in Makati through a retail store. He pays the VAT on his gross sales to the BIR, and the local business tax based
on the same gross sales to the City of Makati. He comes to you for advice because he thinks he is being subjected to double taxation which
he thinks is illegal.
a. There is double taxation and it is not allowed.
b. The City of Makati has no taxing power.
c. There is double taxation, and it is allowed.
d. All of the above.
69. D - convicted
70. The Municipality of Oslob in the Province of Cebu conducts Butanding Watching Activity operationsfor visiting tourists. It also
provides guides to assist the tourists. For such services, the municipalitycharges and collects fees from the tourists. Are these fees taxable?
(a) No. The municipality is a political subdivision of the National Government and thus exempt fromtaxes.
(b) Yes. The income derived by the municipality is not in the exercise of its essential governmentfunctions, but pursuant to its proprietary
function. The income derived therefrom is subject to bothincome tax and VAT. (BIR Ruling No. 471-2018, March 13, 2018).
(c) It depends whether the fees received shall be used for the benefit of the residents of the municipality.
(d) None of the above
The End!