Enviromate 2000
Enviromate 2000
SECTION 1 Identification
Product Identifier
Product name ENVIROMATE® 2000
Other means of
UFI: 7KGS-VSX8-JG04-M60W
identification
Name, address, and telephone number of the chemical manufacturer, importer, or other responsible party
Registered company name Drew Marine
Address 400 Captain Neville Drive, Waterbury CT 06705 United States
Telephone +1-973-526-5700
Email info@drew-marine.com
Other emergency
CHEMWATCH: +613 9573 3188 +61 3 9573 3188
telephone number(s)
Label elements
Hazard pictogram(s)
Hazard statement(s)
Page 1 continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 2 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Supplementary statement(s)
Not Applicable
Substances
See section below for composition of Mixtures
Mixtures
CAS No %[weight] Name
68131-39-5 1-10 alcohols C12-15 ethoxylated
7758-29-4 1-5 sodium tripolyphosphate
532-32-1 <1 sodium benzoate
Not Available >60 Ingredients determined not to be hazardous
The specific chemical identity and/or exact percentage (concentration) of composition has been withheld as a trade secret.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 3 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Extinguishing media
The product contains a substantial proportion of water, therefore there are no restrictions on the type of extinguishing media which may be used. Choice of
extinguishing media should take into account surrounding areas.
Though the material is non-combustible, evaporation of water from the mixture, caused by the heat of nearby fire, may produce floating layers of combustible
substances.
In such an event consider:
foam.
dry chemical powder.
carbon dioxide.
Environmental precautions
See section 12
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 4 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Control parameters
INGREDIENT DATA
Not Available
Emergency Limits
Exposure controls
Appropriate engineering Engineering controls are used to remove a hazard or place a barrier between the worker and the hazard. Well-designed
controls engineering controls can be highly effective in protecting workers and will typically be independent of worker interactions to
provide this high level of protection.
The basic types of engineering controls are:
Process controls which involve changing the way a job activity or process is done to reduce the risk.
Enclosure and/or isolation of emission source which keeps a selected hazard "physically" away from the worker and ventilation
that strategically "adds" and "removes" air in the work environment. Ventilation can remove or dilute an air contaminant if
designed properly. The design of a ventilation system must match the particular process and chemical or contaminant in use.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 5 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Employers may need to use multiple types of controls to prevent employee overexposure.
General exhaust is adequate under normal operating conditions. Local exhaust ventilation may be required in specific
circumstances. If risk of overexposure exists, wear approved respirator. Correct fit is essential to obtain adequate protection.
Provide adequate ventilation in warehouse or closed storage areas. Air contaminants generated in the workplace possess
varying "escape" velocities which, in turn, determine the "capture velocities" of fresh circulating air required to effectively remove
the contaminant.
direct spray, spray painting in shallow booths, drum filling, conveyer loading, crusher dusts, gas 1-2.5 m/s (200-
discharge (active generation into zone of rapid air motion) 500 f/min.)
grinding, abrasive blasting, tumbling, high speed wheel generated dusts (released at high initial velocity 2.5-10 m/s (500-
into zone of very high rapid air motion). 2000 f/min.)
1: Room air currents minimal or favourable to capture 1: Disturbing room air currents
2: Contaminants of low toxicity or of nuisance value only. 2: Contaminants of high toxicity
Simple theory shows that air velocity falls rapidly with distance away from the opening of a simple extraction pipe. Velocity
generally decreases with the square of distance from the extraction point (in simple cases). Therefore the air speed at the
extraction point should be adjusted, accordingly, after reference to distance from the contaminating source. The air velocity at the
extraction fan, for example, should be a minimum of 1-2 m/s (200-400 f/min) for extraction of solvents generated in a tank 2
meters distant from the extraction point. Other mechanical considerations, producing performance deficits within the extraction
apparatus, make it essential that theoretical air velocities are multiplied by factors of 10 or more when extraction systems are
installed or used.
Individual protection
measures, such as
personal protective
equipment
Overalls.
P.V.C apron.
Other protection Barrier cream.
Skin cleansing cream.
Eye wash unit.
Glove — In order of recommendation Cartridge respirators should never be used for emergency ingress or in
AlphaTec® 15-554 areas of unknown vapour concentrations or oxygen content.
The wearer must be warned to leave the contaminated area immediately
AlphaTec® Solvex® 37-185
on detecting any odours through the respirator. The odour may indicate that
AlphaTec® 38-612 the mask is not functioning properly, that the vapour concentration is too
AlphaTec® 58-008 high, or that the mask is not properly fitted. Because of these limitations,
only restricted use of cartridge respirators is considered appropriate.
AlphaTec® 58-530B
Cartridge performance is affected by humidity. Cartridges should be
AlphaTec® 58-530W changed after 2 hr of continuous use unless it is determined that the
AlphaTec® 58-735 humidity is less than 75%, in which case, cartridges can be used for 4 hr.
Used cartridges should be discarded daily, regardless of the length of time
AlphaTec® 79-700
used
AlphaTec® Solvex® 37-675
DermaShield™ 73-711
The suggested gloves for use should be confirmed with the glove supplier.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 7 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Partition coefficient n-
Odour Not Available Not Available
octanol / water
Auto-ignition temperature
Odour threshold Not Available Not Available
(°C)
Decomposition
pH (as supplied) 8.6 Not Available
temperature (°C)
Lower Explosive Limit (%) Not Available Volatile Component (%vol) Not Available
Vapour pressure (kPa) 2.3 Gas group Not Available
Heat of Combustion (kJ/g) Not Available Ignition Distance (cm) Not Available
Flame Height (cm) Not Available Flame Duration (s) Not Available
Nanoform Particle
Nanoform Solubility Not Available Not Available
Characteristics
Possibility of hazardous
See section 7
reactions
Hazardous decomposition
See section 5
products
b) Skin Irritation/Corrosion Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met.
c) Serious Eye
There is sufficient evidence to classify this material as eye damaging or irritating
Damage/Irritation
d) Respiratory or Skin
There is sufficient evidence to classify this material as sensitising to skin or the respiratory system
sensitisation
e) Mutagenicity Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met.
f) Carcinogenicity Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met.
g) Reproductivity Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met.
h) STOT - Single Exposure Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met.
i) STOT - Repeated Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 8 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Exposure
j) Aspiration Hazard Based on available data, the classification criteria are not met.
The material is not thought to produce adverse health effects or irritation of the respiratory tract (as classified by EC Directives
using animal models). Nevertheless, good hygiene practice requires that exposure be kept to a minimum and that suitable
Inhaled
control measures be used in an occupational setting.
Not normally a hazard due to non-volatile nature of product
The material has NOT been classified by EC Directives or other classification systems as "harmful by ingestion". This is because
Ingestion
of the lack of corroborating animal or human evidence.
There is some evidence to suggest that this material can cause inflammation of the skin on contact in some persons.
Open cuts, abraded or irritated skin should not be exposed to this material
Skin Contact
Entry into the blood-stream, through, for example, cuts, abrasions or lesions, may produce systemic injury with harmful effects.
Examine the skin prior to the use of the material and ensure that any external damage is suitably protected.
Eye This material can cause eye irritation and damage in some persons.
Skin contact with the material is more likely to cause a sensitisation reaction in some persons compared to the general
Chronic
population.
TOXICITY IRRITATION
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Not Available Not Available
TOXICITY IRRITATION
alcohols C12-15 [2]
Dermal (rabbit) LD50: >2000 mg/kg Eye: no adverse effect observed (not irritating)[1]
ethoxylated
Oral (Rat) LD50: 1600 mg/kg[2] Skin: no adverse effect observed (not irritating)[1]
TOXICITY IRRITATION
Dermal (rabbit) LD50: >3160 mg/kg[2] Eye: no adverse effect observed (not irritating)[1]
sodium tripolyphosphate
Inhalation (Rat) LC50: >0.39 mg/l4h[1] Skin (Rodent - rabbit): 500mg/24H - Moderate
Oral (Rat) LD50: >2000 mg/kg[1] Skin: no adverse effect observed (not irritating)[1]
TOXICITY IRRITATION
[1]
Dermal (rabbit) LD50: >2000 mg/kg Eye: adverse effect observed (irritating)[1]
sodium benzoate Inhalation (Rat) LC50: >12.2 mg/L4h[1] Skin (Human): 0.5%/20M
Legend: 1. Value obtained from Europe ECHA Registered Substances - Acute toxicity 2. Value obtained from manufacturer's SDS.
Unless otherwise specified data extracted from RTECS - Register of Toxic Effect of chemical Substances
for Tergitol 25-L-9: Neodol 25-9 Neodol 25-7 *Shell Canada ** Huntsman (for Teric 12A9)
Polyethers (such as ethoxylated surfactants and polyethylene glycols) are highly susceptible to being oxidized in the air. They
then form complex mixtures of oxidation products.
Animal testing reveals that whole the pure, non-oxidised surfactant is non-sensitizing, many of the oxidation products are
sensitisers. The oxidization products also cause irritation.
Humans have regular contact with alcohol ethoxylates through a variety of industrial and consumer products such as soaps,
detergents and other cleaning products. Exposure to these chemicals can occur through swallowing, inhalation, or contact with
the skin or eyes. Studies of acute toxicity show that relatively high volumes would have to occur to produce any toxic response.
No death due to poisoning with alcohol ethoxylates has ever been reported. Studies show that alcohol ethoxylates have low
toxicity through swallowing and skin contact.
Animal studies show these chemicals may produce gastrointestinal irritation, stomach ulcers, hair standing up, diarrhea and
lethargy. Slight to severe irritation occurred when undiluted alcohol ethyoxylates were applied to the skin and eyes of animals.
ALCOHOLS C12-15 These chemicals show no indication of genetic toxicity or potential to cause mutations and cancers. Toxicity is thought to be
ETHOXYLATED substantially lower than that of nonylphenol ethoxylates.
Some of the oxidation products of this group of substances may have sensitizing properties.
As they cause less irritation, nonionic surfactants are often preferred to ionic surfactants in topical products. However, their
tendency to auto-oxidise also increases their irritation. Due to their irritating effect it is difficult to diagnose allergic contact
dermatitis (ACD) by patch testing.
Both laboratory and animal testing has shown that there is no evidence for alcohol ethoxylates (AEs) causing genetic damage,
mutations or cancer. No adverse reproductive or developmental effects were observed.
Tri-ethylene glycol ethers undergo enzymatic oxidation to toxic alkoxy acids. They may irritate the skin and the eyes. At high oral
doses, they may cause depressed reflexes, flaccid muscle tone, breathing difficulty and coma. Death may result in experimental
animal. However, repeated exposure may cause dose dependent damage to the kidneys as well as reproductive and
developmental defects.
The material may produce severe irritation to the eye causing pronounced inflammation. Repeated or prolonged exposure to
irritants may produce conjunctivitis.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 9 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Asthma-like symptoms may continue for months or even years after exposure to the material ends. This may be due to a non-
allergic condition known as reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS) which can occur after exposure to high levels of
highly irritating compound. Main criteria for diagnosing RADS include the absence of previous airways disease in a non-atopic
individual, with sudden onset of persistent asthma-like symptoms within minutes to hours of a documented exposure to the
SODIUM irritant. Other criteria for diagnosis of RADS include a reversible airflow pattern on lung function tests, moderate to severe
TRIPOLYPHOSPHATE bronchial hyperreactivity on methacholine challenge testing, and the lack of minimal lymphocytic inflammation, without
eosinophilia. RADS (or asthma) following an irritating inhalation is an infrequent disorder with rates related to the concentration of
and duration of exposure to the irritating substance. On the other hand, industrial bronchitis is a disorder that occurs as a result
of exposure due to high concentrations of irritating substance (often particles) and is completely reversible after exposure
ceases. The disorder is characterized by difficulty breathing, cough and mucus production.
NOTE: Oral doses of 8-10g may cause nausea and vomiting, though tolerance in human is 50 g/day. Use in food limited to 0.1%.
[ICI]
The following information refers to contact allergens as a group and may not be specific to this product.
Contact allergies quickly manifest themselves as contact eczema, more rarely as urticaria or Quincke's oedema. The
pathogenesis of contact eczema involves a cell-mediated (T lymphocytes) immune reaction of the delayed type. Other allergic
skin reactions, e.g. contact urticaria, involve antibody-mediated immune reactions. The significance of the contact allergen is not
simply determined by its sensitisation potential: the distribution of the substance and the opportunities for contact with it are
equally important. A weakly sensitising substance which is widely distributed can be a more important allergen than one with
SODIUM BENZOATE stronger sensitising potential with which few individuals come into contact. From a clinical point of view, substances are
noteworthy if they produce an allergic test reaction in more than 1% of the persons tested.
For benzoates:
Benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid and its sodium and potassium salt have a common metabolic and excretion pathway. All but benzyl
alcohol are considered to be unharmful and of low acute toxicity. They may cause slight irritation by oral, dermal or inhalation
exposure except sodium benzoate which doesn't irritate the skin. Studies showed increased mortality, reduced weight gain, liver
and kidney effects at higher doses, also, lesions of the brains, thymus and skeletal muscles may occur with benzyl alcohol.
However, they do not cause cancer, genetic or reproductive toxicity. Developmental toxicity may occur but only at maternal toxic
level.
Respiratory or Skin
STOT - Repeated Exposure
sensitisation
Legend: – Data either not available or does not fill the criteria for classification
– Data available to make classification
Toxicity
Legend: Extracted from 1. IUCLID Toxicity Data 2. Europe ECHA Registered Substances - Ecotoxicological Information - Aquatic Toxicity
4. US EPA, Ecotox database - Aquatic Toxicity Data 5. ECETOC Aquatic Hazard Assessment Data 6. NITE (Japan) -
Bioconcentration Data 7. METI (Japan) - Bioconcentration Data 8. Vendor Data
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 10 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
No Data available for all ingredients No Data available for all ingredients
Bioaccumulative potential
Ingredient Bioaccumulation
Mobility in soil
Ingredient Mobility
Labels Required
Marine Pollutant NO
Air transport (ICAO-IATA / DGR): NOT REGULATED FOR TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS
Sea transport (IMDG-Code / GGVSee): NOT REGULATED FOR TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 11 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
14.7.1. Transport in bulk according to Annex II of MARPOL and the IBC code
Not Applicable
14.7.2. Transport in bulk in accordance with MARPOL Annex V and the IMSBC Code
Product name Group
Safety, health and environmental regulations / legislation specific for the substance or mixture
Federal Regulations
Explosive No
Self-heating No
Pyrophoric (Liquid or Solid) No
Pyrophoric Gas No
Corrosive to metal No
Organic Peroxide No
Self-reactive No
Combustible Dust No
Carcinogenicity No
Acute toxicity (any route of exposure) No
Reproductive toxicity No
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 12 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
Aspiration Hazard No
Simple Asphyxiant No
US. EPA CERCLA Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities (40 CFR 302.4)
None Reported
US. EPCRA Section 313 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) (40 CFR 372)
None Reported
State Regulations
USA - TSCA All chemical substances in this product have been designated as TSCA Inventory ‘Active'
Other information
Classification of the preparation and its individual components has drawn on official and authoritative sources as well as independent review by the Chemwatch
Classification committee using available literature references.
The SDS is a Hazard Communication tool and should be used to assist in the Risk Assessment. Many factors determine whether the reported Hazards are Risks
in the workplace or other settings. Risks may be determined by reference to Exposures Scenarios. Scale of use, frequency of use and current or available
engineering controls must be considered.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 24-0192 Page 13 of 13 Issue Date: 30/11/2023
Version No: 10.1 Print Date: 03/04/2025
ENVIROMATE® 2000
end of SDS