0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views11 pages

Can Criativity Can Be Developed

Dr. J.P. Guilford explores the potential for developing creativity in individuals, emphasizing its importance in addressing modern challenges and the cultural competition posed by the Soviet Union. He argues that creativity is not solely an innate gift but can be cultivated through education and personal effort, highlighting the need for imaginative thinking in various aspects of life. The document discusses the societal attitudes that hinder creative expression and the necessity of fostering an environment that encourages innovative problem-solving.

Uploaded by

Simone Neiva
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views11 pages

Can Criativity Can Be Developed

Dr. J.P. Guilford explores the potential for developing creativity in individuals, emphasizing its importance in addressing modern challenges and the cultural competition posed by the Soviet Union. He argues that creativity is not solely an innate gift but can be cultivated through education and personal effort, highlighting the need for imaginative thinking in various aspects of life. The document discusses the societal attitudes that hinder creative expression and the necessity of fostering an environment that encourages innovative problem-solving.

Uploaded by

Simone Neiva
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11
Can Creativity be Developed? Dr. J.P. Guilford (Professor of Psychology) ‘To cite this article: Dr. J. P, Guilford (Professor of Psychology) (1958) Can Creatity be Developed”, Art Education, 11:6, 318 To link to this artic 8) riches enn: 30 Dec2015, GF suvmit your article to this joumal La are ews 8 BB vewrssusansie /nttps//4o.org/10.1080/00043125,1958,11653715, ‘Almost exactly six months ago, the people of thove United States were mont rudely shaken by the news that communist Rusia had paced inte fotbit the Bist man-made satelite, By ll the ex: pectations that should follow from our suppowd Scietie and. technical superiority, sch a thing should not have happened. We, not Rusia, should hhave been the fist to. accomplish this torical event which propery aired the imagination and the admiration of the vehole work What had happened tous? Where wa our Yankee ingeity on which we had prided ourselves? Why did this imaginative achievement occur it politcal ee mate that should have dulled individeal thought And initiative and notin a democratic timate there the individual and not the sate is the center of human interest? [Needs for Creativity ‘Yow know aswell as Ido about the soul sarc ing and the sf critics that have engaged ou thinking. people following the Sputaik episodes There have heen a number of consequences ad conclusions, but to me, two things stand out. One ‘of these ie that we mist reali that the Resin soviet threat is not purely and simply 4 military And the days of television we have lost something that is of grea importance toa peoples important not only for ther survival ut alo for thee hap- Pines. Your recent ancestors and mine, who ers fo this continent to create new homes, faced a ‘multitude of probleme that demanded contin aletnes and ready adaptability 0 new ‘circum sanees, Bach day called for its measure of ine Drovising and each tomorow called foe vision And, if we an believe the everpresent westerns, tadventue ly just around the corner riseat-day living offers an interesting paradox, (On the one hand the satisfaction of our personal, daily needs has been reduced o the poine chat about all we have 10 do isto push buttons and tum Kaba IF rouble develop, the probleme thus created are beyond our rope of information and stil. We dial another gadget and call for an eee- tricia or repairman, Superficial, ths would seem to remove from ut sod of the needs for erative inking needed in the solution of probleme. But judging by the increasing dependence upon the Doychiatrist and upon tranquilizer pills for alaying Ansictis, one would think thatthe hazard of ve Fg were veater than ever before. What are the tne, wo be met by military measure So far as one fan tel the military race has reached a condition of stakemate which makes pen military conflict on a large sale unlikely The Rusia challenge is now clarly made on at ron; cultural and intelectual aswell x pol fal and economic. At whatever point the Sov Union can show auperoriy, i here by them ana victory for the cormuniaie way of Hl, We Should welcome the challenge of competion on the eukual and ineiectual level. Acceptance of the challenge will be oe of cur strongest ures af motivation for sme tne to come, Tt may be Argued that thee are better and. more worthy sources of motivation for sting for excellence, But the tewth ser to be that we have been in short supply of other sources, and none could te as urgent a the need for the survival of out ration and our way of ile, ‘The other thing that stands out is our lack of preparedness to sneet the intellectual challenge that Russia has thrown in our direction. Some where between the days of the American pincer pace of modem life taxes the individual, often be Yond his eapacity. While che intricate social na Chine solver many of our personal problems, i freates many others Tt takes some Hngensity to tse that machine wisely and advantageously. ‘The machine breaks dawn in is functioning st many Point and i in need of many improvements. It Functioning i never sai. It produces disco, such ar unemployment, It cteaer new desires. T. calls for changes in ways of living. Thus, problems of life are always with us: One unfortunate conse {quence ofthe availabilty fap any Kinds of ser fees may be that the habit of oversdependence pon others generalizes too broadly. I sup to us ta teach the child that there ae sill many areas of lite in which problems must be faced and in which creative thinking is needed. "The needs for creative thinking arise fom source in ation to those imposed ipo us by the Soviet challenge and the complexity and speed of modern Ising. We have become increasingly aware of the problem of monotony hrought ahovt by the machine age in industry. This problem has become intensified by the coming of automation Tn this nictre. human eines have been allowed reasons? Have we become so unaccustomed to ‘handling our own personal problems that we make big troubles out of little ones? Is our resourcefule ness withering from lack of exercite of our thinking apparatus? Or are there, after all, many new and ‘more difficult problems? Some truth lies in the affirmative answers to all of these questions. I have mentioned the technical problems that we customarily tum over to others to solve for us. The shifting of responsibility for solving personal problems docs not stop with tech- nical matters. In this age of specialization, services of all kinds are offered for a price. We need only consult the Yellow pages of the telephone direc- tony; we are encouraged more and more 10 do so. We have developed a social and economie ma- chine of enormous complexity and proportions. The use of that machine has not been an unmixed blessing. Te makes possible a fullness of living never before known by the average person. At the same time, it can be crippling to those who learn to de- pend too much upon i T have been giving just one side of the picture. We are often reminded that the complexity and to behave less and less like human beings. They have few decisions to make and they have litte or no opportunity for constructive and inventive thinking. By nature we like to make decisions and if we are normal we derive considerable satisfaction from the mastery of problems by productive think- ing. Wolfgang Koehler found that even anthro- pid apes are delighted with their own inventions, ‘modest though those inventions are. The ape that ‘mastered the stunt of making a long stick by put ting together two shorter ones in order to rake in food from outside his cage wat not content to accept the food as his only reward. In fact, at the ‘moment, it was not his chief source of satisfaction, He kept playing with his new tool, using it to rake in other things that were of no immediate use to him. The joy of mastery over problems seems to be a deep-seated kind of reward, not confined to humans, It is no wonder that the modern worker some- times feels frustrated and unhappy. To the extent that he is lacking the satisfactions that come from mastery over problems, there is a kind of solution, If he cannot find the opportunities for ereative thinking in his work, be shoald find them else- ‘where, Iti the whole man that needs to be sats- fied, Research has shown that if a man's work ‘does aot appeal to hie interests and satis his prychological needs he can tolerate this circum stance much better if his hobbies do bring the kinds of graifiations he seeks. Some of our thinkers in socal philosophy become alarmed occasionally when wondering how work- fers are going to use their increasing leinze time If workers could be given a good taste of the re- wards for creative effort and if they consequently fumed this Iesure time to constructive purposes, wwe should have little problem from this source Tis often sated thatthe ancient Greeks were able to experience a flowering of the arts, science, and philosophy beeause of their leisure time. Why can ‘hot our Heine tine be turned to similar uses? Perhaps the strongest force operating against this kind of development is an unfortunate atinude for climate that has been permitted to develop in ‘America; an attitade thar does not favor the arts for, in fact, anything intellecwal. Our national heroes have been cowboys, military leaders, base- and aptitude may seem unfair, and fair play may seem 10 call for handicapping those who cold excel. This is carrying a supposed ideal much too far, Democracy should mean centering atiention on the individual, his rights, and his opportunities, But it does not mean robbing the one to even up things for the other. The stubborn facts of life present us with great individual differences. In- stead of attempting to hide this fact, we should sive every individual the chance to make the most ‘of what he has and to become the best of which he 5s capable In part the antiintllectual astude can be laid at the door of us who teach, Perkape our own values are in some need of revision and perhape wwe also need more courage of our convictions, Re- cently T wat discusing with some fellow faculty members che relatively small recognition received by the superior student of science as compared with the football star. Their reaction was, “Well, the science student docs not fill the stadium on Sature cay afternoons.” T hope they were not serious Perhaps they only thought they were stating a fact. 1 do not know. My reply was to the effect that the science student may not fill the stadium but be ball players, and even desperadoes. ‘The arts and learning in general have been regarded as not quite masculine and not quite respectable, in some quar~ ters. We have begun to feel the full effects of the fantiintellectual atmosphere. It has gone s0 for that bright children sometimes feel compelled to conceal their brilliance. I have even heard of parents who have alo tried to conceal the brili= lance of their children. We hear of college students ‘who feel that they must study on the sly so as not to lose face with their fellows, for example a gist ‘who made Phi Beta Kappa by reading under her bedcovers after the lights in her socority had been tured out. The term “egghead” has become an epithet in recent years; added to the term “long- hain.” which is of longer standing. Incidentally, it is just a Title dificule o see how both terms ean be applied to the same person! Tn part, this attitude isa refletion of a general pressure toward conformity. In some instances the ‘democratic ideal has been misinterpreted to mean ‘equality of ability, as if it would be best for every fone if we could all be fitted to the same Procrus- tean standard of mediocrity. Differences of talent inventive. Such behavior can be found in clearest fori in the lives of certain peoplescientits who make new discoveries and construct new theories; artists, designers, writers, and composers; and architeés, designers, and builders. Many of the things that sch people produce have never been brought into existence before. We will not quibble cover the oftdebated question of whether = thing must never have existed belore in order to justify calling the production creative of whether it must he novel in every respect. So long as the person arsives at a produet that has novel aspects 40 far a8 he is concemed, to this extent I should say he has created. Note that T have only sai that there are certain clases of individuals from whom we expect more clearly creative behavior, It is my conception that creativity i not confined to sich people, but is shared to some degree by all human’ 195 if nat by other species as w T suspect that there are many people who believe that ereativity is a gift and that they do not want to attempt to understand it or do not believe that it ean be understood. This is probably one aspect fof a more general attitude that has been held for centuries regarding the pessibility of understanding will ill the rocket ships in the sky above us, Not the least of the problems that call for erea- tive thinking are those concerned with interper- sonal relationships. Imagination in dealing with ‘one's fellows is greatly needed at the personal level, in local and national polities, and on the interna tional seene. Technical progress has made posible 4 broader margin of survival The same amount fof inventive genius has not been shown in cor nection with the operations of living together. Un- til we somehow extend creative thinking in social directions, alo, there will continue to be confict and unnecessary unhappiness, What Creativity Means Enough has probably been said thus far to show that in many places in our lives more productive, inventive thinking would be most helpful, if it is not a clear necessity. Itis time that we considered creativity itself more closely before we ask whether there is anything we could do to help develop it and to promote its use, 1 think of creativity as being something that lies behind behavior; behavior that it imaginative and 1Q tests. One of the things that impressed me was the fact that nowhere among them was much place aiven to ereative performances. It seoms to me that intelligent individuals should. show their intelli- ‘gence by being inventive in some way. Some years later, a fellow faculty member from journalism ‘came t0 me to ask what the paychologists knew about creativity. He was trying to develop creative \writers among his students, With much ehagrin 1 had to tell him that there was almost nothing that wwe psychologists knew about the subject. It was to some extent these sources of frusteas tion that led me later to investigations in the area, of aptitude for eveative performance. For the past ten years, with financial support from the Navy and the Air Force, my students and T have de- voted considerable’ effort toward understanding intellectual abilities in general and among them the abilities in the area of ereative thinking.’ In approaching the subject from the standpoint of aptitudes or abilities we do not believe that abil ties alone will provide all the reasons why people are creative of not creative, Obviously, motivation, and temperamental qualities enter into the piewre, Our studies have just recently branched of in the human mind in any of its manifestations, There are people till today, who hold up a forbidding hand to the psychologist who attempts to undes stand homan nature and human behavior, just as centuries ago there was resistance to understanding the earth and the plants and uncovering the secrets of the winds, the tides, and the shooting stars. To the paychologist, erestive performances, Hike all behavior, are natural phenomena and we have the capability eventually to understand them, With- fut understanding them, there is Kittle chance of doing much, if anything, about them, except 10 accept them fatalistically when they oceur and t0 bemoan their absence when they do not occur, Ie is tue that psychological understanding of cre- ative activity has been slow in developing. Of all, behavior, i is one of the mest difficult types to investigate, which probably accounts for the slow start that has been made in that direction Creativity as An Aspect of Intellect ‘My own interest in the subject of creativity goes back many years. As a young psychologist, T one time administered to children some of the common time we have evidence for nearly 50 such dstinct= Jy different ineletsal abies, When we examine the different factors of intel Feet, we find that they fall logically into certain clases. They have ceriain sinlaritice and difler- ‘ences, depending upon the operations that are re- ‘quired of individuals who perform the asigned tasks, upon the kinds of material operated with, and upon the Rind of end prodict We might ay that there are three known kinds of intligence depending upon the kind of mae terial involved in the tasks or ust. One kind may be called eonerete intelligence because the material ‘dealt with is in the form of ehings that you can see or hear or fel. The object deat with nay be visual forms with the various properties that visual forms ean have oF they may be speech sounds or rusial sounds, to mention the mot common vat ies of concrete materials ‘A second class of abilities as to do with verbal seanings. We may say thatthe material is seman tic andthe general area of ability is semantic intelligence. Such abies are moet important in Ikarning to read and inthe verbal aspects of arith metic, so they have tended to dominate conven tional intelligence cess. So many school subjects those dircetions also. T should like to give you some general ideas of the nature of intelligence, as a general setting for the more clearly creative-thinking abilities, for the creative abilities find their natural place among the rest of the intellectual abilities, We discover the different kinds of abilities by a particular statistical ‘method known as factor analysis, which, as a med ‘x, will not concern us here. Very briefly and ‘enidely explained, we start out by asking ourselves what are all the different kinds of tasks of an in- tellectual nature that human beings do? We next ask how well each person can do in performing on ‘each kind of task. Everyone does well on some and poorly on others. No one does equally well on all kinds of tasks. Where the same individuals tend to do well on a small group of similar tasks, we conclude that underlying their performances on these tasks and in common to them is a unique kind of ability involved; a factor. At the present "Under Contract None 23810 between the Office of Naval Research andthe University of Southern California, lence ia one area could even be coupled with near idiocy in some other, beeause the factors of intel- Tigence are relatively independent There ean be inejalites of ability even within the same area for abilities aso depend upon the kinds of operations performed. There appear 10 be five classes of operations each of which applies to the four aveas just mentioned, One kind of op ‘eration it smply that of knowing information; dis covering information or redicovering oF recagni ing it. Abilis of another clas have to-do with memory; memory for the diferent kinds of ma terial and for diferent products resulting from the ase of tho materia “Two elases of abilities have to do with produc: sive thinking, By preduetive thinking T do. not necessarily mean creative thinking. I merely mean {hat from given information some new informs tion is produced or generated, Given certain in formation about weather conditions today we pre ict the weather for tomorrow. Given certain ‘numerial information we estimate the amount of ach ingredient needed in a fel Usa will take ws to the moon and back Tdo not mean to apy, of course, that sich ealelations are cemimon, evety day operations. T am only giving examples of pro depend upon reading that this is an understand- able bias, But such tests have been somewhat un- fair to those who excel much more in the concrete intellectual area or in the area to be mentioned next. A third intellectual area features material that ‘might be called symbolie. Tests that indicate abil- ties in this area are composed of material such as lecers, numbers, syllables, and words (where word meanings are of no importance; only spelling) Abilities 10 operate with these kinds of materials according to rules are of importance in the com- ‘mon subjects of language and mathematics, A possible fourth area of intellect that can be predicted from what we know would deal with another kind of material, namely, the behavior of individuals. It would be known as social intlli- gence. Understanding one's fellows, being aware fof their desires, their thoughts, and their attitudes takes different abilities than thote pertaining to concrete objects, verbal meanings, or syinbolic ‘material. Different individuals would possibly excel Jn one or more of these areas but notin all, Excel 4 (CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT, jrors paze 7 around or changing direction. Tt does not neces: sarily mean fying in the faee of convention, but it frequently leads to unconventional results, It ie in the diveryentthinking category that oe find the abilities most pertinent to creative thinking. Tt ca rot be truthfully said that only divergent-thinking abilties contribute to ereative produetion, for other categories of intelleetual resources play their parts It can be said that ereative people are more likely to excel in the divergent-thinking abilities, Tefore discussing divergent-thinking abilities in any more detail and completing the general pi ture of intellect, I should say that a fifth class of abilities comes under the heading of evaluation. We evaluate much of what we do, at almost any step of the way. We evaluate our information, asking ourselves whether i is correct or complete We evaluate what we remember and recall, asking Whether it is a faithful reproduction and whether it is what we need in this particular situation. We evaluate the results of productive thinking, test- ing whether our answer is correct (in convergent thinking) or whether itis suitable or reasonable, fr good oF satisfying (in divergent thinking). Self criticism is with us always, whether we realize it ductive thinking “The last example represents one ofthe twa class ¢s of productive thinking; the one called “conver- gent” thinking. ‘The outcome is usually one or. rect answer. In a mathematical problem the rules of lie ate 20 precise and so binding that with certain given information there can be only one conchison. Other insiances of convergent tke ing are perhaps less binding, but if they lead to tore than one acceptable answer there is litle latitude for deviation. Tf 1 ask you "What is the ppesite of the word “good,” your first thought is "bad" which isthe conventional answer, and it would be scored as carec ina test. But there are other responses that we might regard at fulfilling the requirements of the ques- tion, Other words meaning neatly the opposite of “good” are “poor,” “wicked” or “faulty.” If your problems were to find out how many alternative "esponss you could think of in this connection, you would be indulging in oehat we call “divergent thinking” Divergent thinking involves searching turn to page 14 ‘can in a given time, being given only a few ele ments such as an angle, a curve, and a cixcle, Tt is true, of course, that the creative person. rarely ‘works under such time pressures as we apply in fluency tests. The time control is designed to pro vide equal opportunity forthe purposes of testing is assumed that the person who can produce most under these conditions has certain kind of advantage in terme of fertility of thinking also when he has more time. Whether or not thie is true ean of course be determined by experiment Another important aspect of ereativity is flex bility of thinking or freedom from rigidity. Our nvestigations have shown tbat there are two kinds of Mexbilty of thinking. One is called “xpontane- fous flexbilty”” since it represents automatic changes in direction of thinking even when itis not necessary, Actually, the person sho is high on the scale of spontaneous flexibility tends 10. be flighty and fanciful in his thinking habits. ‘This of changing the subject may be bothersome under some circumstances but i¢ ges the thinker around to unusual ideas, some of which may prove tbe valuable TThe other kind is called “adaptive flexibility,” since itis essential in dhe solution of many probs oF not. It helps us to guide our thinking to profit. able ends and co tell us when we have solved our problem and when we need 10 start over again, Useful as a more or less final step, evaluation is frequently inhibiting when applied too strongly oF too early Some Divergent-Thinking Abilities Several abilities aecount most dircetly for both the quantity and quality of our divergent thinking in creative performance. Quantity of output is dependent upon our fluency of thinking. Fluency is the facility with which thinking operations pro- ceed or flow. One person may be able to produce 50 ideas a minute while another has difficulty in producing 5. For example, we present to each examinee a plot for a short story and ask him to sive as many titles as he ean think of for the story jn a few minutes. In another test we ask him to ive ax many uses as be can think of for a com- ‘mon brick, In the form of a figural test, in which figural ideas are called for, we could ask examinees to present as many different border designs as they ing material Tn the creativethinkng area you would certain. Ty expect thar a tat of originality would readily appear under investigation. ‘This expectation is sound. Individuals show their originality in test performances of diferent kinds, by giving novel for unusual responses, by giving far-fetched of re- smotely connected responses, or by giving clever responses If we count only the elever responses to the plorttles test we have a score for originality Tf-we ask examinees to tell us wht the conte quences would be if beginning in 1960 only boy babies were born, and if we aceept only farreach ing effects, the score indicates originality, ‘To give examples closer to the graphic arts, I ‘can mention a couple of similar test. Tn one we ive a short sentence mich as “Ring the bell” and ak the examinee 1 expres by means of simple lines the word “ring” and the word “bell” In another text ofthis type we ask hitn to expres in single Lines the meanings of adjectives, sucht as “angry.” “quiet” and “playful” Many years ago T gave such atest to student in a course on design The teacher independently ranked her students in the order of what she regarded to be their stats in originality. The agreement between scores and Jems. It i alo an ease jn changing direction of thinking, but it sof a more positive type than that of spontaneous flexibility. In trying to salve a probe Jem, some thinkers doggedly pensst in following ‘one adopted approach in spite of failure. They are lacking in adaprive flexibility. Other thinkers une der the same circumstances get out of their old ruts, strike off on new approaches, and solve the problems, Being tradition bound is largely a matter ‘of low status with respect to adaptive esiility. We test for adaptive flexibility by giving prob: leans that Took as if all they need are old types of, solutions but that cannot be solved without new and unusual types. We test for spontaneous flexi= bility by offering the examinee the chance to re- main in a comfortable groove or to show a variety of responses. For example, in the test calling for uses of a common brick, the person with strong spontaneous flexibility offers several different kinds of uses, such as using the brick as a weight, a mis. sile, a building material, a filter, and so on. The person low on spontaneous flexibility rides a hobby. He may never get beyond using the brick as build 3 INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR [ART EDUCATION. Invitation extended to oll art educators, head ‘masters, school authortiee az well as to al Insitutions and federations concerned with the artistic edueation of youth in all coun ranks was quite good) Tn another divergent-thinking type of wat we sive a very few lines, which could be developed in to many different objects by the addition of more lines. When we score the test in terms of the degree ‘of complexity the examinee tended to show, we found that the scare measures a trait we call elaboration ability. The same ability is indicated by the extent to which a person can offer details to round out a plan when he is given only the out line of the plan, Some Motivotional and Temperemental Traits Involved Our analyses indicate that there are baie inter- ests in a number of different kinds of thinking Some of these ate found to be slightly related to performance cviginalty and they may also therefore play’ some parc in other creative performances. There are ‘other motivational and temperamental factors that we als find related to test performances, turn to page 16 tests of fluency, flexibility, and tries to toke part in the Tenth International Congress for Art Education in Bosle/Switz- feland, held from the 7th to the 12th of August 1958, With the allembracing theme: "Edueation in the Arts as an Essential and Necessary Part ‘of all Human Education” this Congress has st the following objectives: to convey an impression of the present state of art education in all participating —to put forth and to clarify the mest acute problems of art education —to investigate the possiblities of giving att tedueation its due seope in the framework of all types of schools; —to interest the public all over the world in aan adequate artistic education of youth For further information verte: Kongress-Sekretariat FEA ‘Auf dem Hummel 28, Basle, Switzerland. 16 ‘The person who is a more fluent thinker is ike- ly to be more impulsive, more self confident, and less inclined to be neurotic. He is likely to appreci- ate creativity and aesthetic expression and 10 lite to indulge in reflective thinking. ‘The flexible thinker is Tikely to feel a need for variety and to ce reflective thinking. The more original person clined to be self confident and tolerant of am- biguity, and he likes reflective and divergent think ing and aesthetic expression. The person wh fon originality is inclined to be oversmeticulous and to feel a strong need for discipline and for its enforcement, The more original person is not ec: cssrily low on a need for moral conformity, or on appreciation for moral values, in contradiction to commonly expressed, stereotyped belief. I should remind you that these conclusions come from re- lationships found with performance in psychologi= cal tests. In everyday life there may be somewhat different relaionships in the population, and cer- tain individuals may provide dramatic exceptions to any rules that apply in general Development of Creativity ‘The growing appreciation of the need for in- creasing the level of creative performance in ovr population has led to some attempts along educa- tional lines. No doubt many of you, as teachers, have also felt that something should be done in this direction. As teachers of art you occupy a unique place in this respect and you may feel that you have some responsibility that goes beyond that of contributing to the development of creative artists Of all the subjects taught in the schools, art sands out as the one area in which pupils and students not only have some freedom to he erea- tive but are expected to be creative. Those respon: sible for the teaching of art have a double ques- tion: (1) ean development of habits of creativity bbe encouraged in courses in art and (2) can such habits be made to transfer so they will be operative in other and effective areas of intelectual ‘endeavor? T confess that T am not informed concerning ‘what may have been done specifically with the in- tention of developing creativity in courses of art struction. But I might cal to your attention seme things that are being done outside that field. In scattered places, special courses designed ime prove creativity have been given, by teachers in various fields, The number of such courses has increased enormously during the past few yeats, until, as T have been told, there are about two thousand being offered; in’ universities, in indus tries, and in governmental agencies. Such courset have usally consisted of Jecuures on the nature of creativity and on exercises in ereative thinking and problem solving. ‘A special technique that has been used in this connection is the so-called “brain-storming session” fof which you have probably heard. It wat designed by Alex Osborn, of the firm of Batten, Barton, Durstine, and Osborn, more particularly for the eneration of new ideas for use in advertising. Typically, a small group of individuals comes to- gether for the purpose of thinking up new ideas o meet some need, which has heen announced in advance. The atmosphere is completely uncritical and permissive. Anything goes and it is expected that one person's remarks will stimulate ideas in others, so that the net effect is greater output than could be obtained if the same individuals were thinking in isolation. Rigorous experiments design- fd to evaluate the brainstorming technique have not been reported, but informal impresions are that it increases the production of Heas and trains the participants in useful thinking habits. Much better than special courses on creative thinking and special techniques would be increased attention to creativity incidental to common sub- Jeet matter. There are many fields of instruction in which there are opportunities to introduce the student to exercises in creative thinking, "This ‘would include courses in science, in the humanities, and in the social studies, a¢ well as in the arts, Some fields, of course, offer more opportunities than others. Bur in all of them the opportunities depend largely upon ow the subject matter is taught and upon the attitudes of the teacher. Un derstanding the nature of ereative performance in terms of the abilities and other traits that con twibate to it should be of considerable help in selecting the materials of instruction, the manner of presentation of that material, and the instillation of the appropriate attitudes on the part of the student, In large part, development of creativity on the part of students will depend upon changed atti= tudes of both teacher and student. It is reported that in a certain country the respect for texthook information is even greater than iti in the U.S.A The goal of the student i+ to memorize the text- book material in order to pass examinations that call for a demonstration of such knowledge. ‘The consequence is that the graduate knows what who said about what, but there is litle preparation for tackling new problems, especially where textbook information falls short or is even in error. I do not wish to disparage the goal of acquiring informa tion. Tt is not the acquisition of information, as such, that is harmful to creative performance, for invention revs upon prior information, Te is the attitude toward information that often gets in the way of creative thinking. A similar statement can be made regarding methods. ‘There can be an oversespect for the sscredness of methods. A woman tokd me recently ‘of an experience she had at a child in a school in England. The art teacher assigned an exercise and told the class exactly how she wanted it done, Our Title girl thought that she saw a much better way of doing the exercise and proceeded 0 do it in hher own way. The teacher caught her in the act of doing tne exercise and proceeded to do it in hher own way. The teacher caught her in the act and reprimanded her for it, Being stubborn, the lial girl proceeded to do the task in her own way while the teacher was not looking. Her end prod uct, incidentally, was later judged the best in the class. But apart from her happier, eventual out- come, the important point is that she had been punished for being unconventional How many other children are similarly punished for showing originality? How often are conforming children rewarded for their conformity? According to the best information we have regarding the prychology of learning, there should be no surer way of de- veloping habits of conformity and of discouraging habits of creativity How against creative effort in the ny other kinds of blocks are built up average student? n which the ating a more permissive climate child learns, since li way of creative thinking he expeets little of himself in this direction is expected of him in the There seems t© be a popular opinion that ereative performance is the special prerogative of the gifted few who are capable of it Ifthe child classifies himself as belonging in the nnon-creative group he accepts his fate and makes "7 FOR REAL OIL PAINTING ON YOUR Tac torars) "Yara cn nee items) ate ce a a Strasse! aoe ete 7 Ne Se (Gero Dyey Toa porns el ert ar ‘Gk con be wate of hones, athe equpeen sh topy a Tous sr ont ple a tpl enn wee subscribe to SCHOOL THE EDITOR, D. Kenneth Winebrener, Pofestr of Au, Bafelo Teachers College, has been @ Teacher thoeghout his ‘dull ie. Asa teacher in public schools ond now ino «allege raining techer, he know om Rashand experience {ist the mateial you wat fr clesroom use—the stimulating, practical kind. Working wih th Etre on advisory board fait education leaden rom United States, Canad, ond cbrocd—a team of experienced Ywacheredion, onring You of editoilexcellnce ond voy tht wil ‘ereshing it wih each new ive Subseribe todey—ton issues, six dollars. SCHOOL ARTS, Printer Beilding, Worcener 8, Man. 18 little or no effort 1 be original or productive. The inuth of the matter sems to be that outstandingly creative people simply have in high degree the same abilities that all of us have to some extent. A realization of this fact should be a real stimulus to many youngsters who have been afraid try their ‘wings for laek of confidence. Granting that instruction in art offers numerous opportunities to teach habits of creativity, ean the evelopment of such habite karned in art courses have any effeet pon creative performance in other courses of in life in general? This is a special case of the old educational question of wansfer of train- ing. We are familia with the experimental findings that che Teaming of habits such as that of neatness in one course often fails to transer 10 work in another. We have also heen teaching under an educational bias stemming from the belief that learning is highly specific. The belief in the dis plinary value of learaing has been at a low ebb for some years, My own view is that we shall have to reccat from this extreme view, Learning docs xeneralize more than some specialists are willing fo admit. We shall have to continue t0 recognize that there aze limits to wansfer of habits, but dhere is much transfer. There is much evidence that the amount and ind of transfer depend largely upon the manner Jn which the learning takes place as well as upen the similacty of tasks between which the transfer isto occu. If similarity of tasks were the only bass for transfer, the learning of habits and skills of creativity in art would show little application 0 other areas, in scence, for example. Tt it large'y tip to the teacher, therefore, to help the student bridge the gap between art and other feds Tis unfortunate, but to the present time, art thas been considered by the average person 36 a thing apart; a rather solaced eld, Instead, att should be regarded as an aspect of living in gen: feral. Tt should help to embelish and to ench day- today activities There seems to be a growing ap- preciation of this principle, as demonstrated in the ereased attention paid to art in the architecture of buildings designed for business and industrial Durpores as well as of homes and public buildings and the attention paid to home decoration. We ‘ould go further in those directions, Acceptance of this principle, however, at well as the principle ‘hat individuals generally have something worthy of expression would help to bridge the gap between creativity in art and creativity in ether areas of lite. 1 will be largely up to the teacher of att to swateh for opportunites to help the student make the conneetions T should like to leave you with some questions to which T think you know the answers. Tt has heen sid that there are almost as many human beings living on this planet today as had lived in all historical time before the present population was born. Do we have our share of creative geniuses? Are we living too much on inherited capital? Is there anything we can do. about the siwation? OF one thing T feet reasonably sure. If we could somehow raise the level of creativity of the average person even by a small percentage, the social consequences would be very great PRATT INSTITUTE THE ART SCHOOL BS. In Art Teacher Education, BFA. in Adverts: Ing Design, Grophic Arte & Ilustration, and In terior Design. B. of Ind. Design, MS. in Art Edu cation and Master of Ind. Design. Director of Admissions, Brooklyn 5, N.Y.

You might also like