How is an agreement formed?

To form an agreement, the following ingredients are required:

• Parties: There need to be two or more parties to form an agreement

• Offer/ Proposal: When a person signifies to another his willingness of doing or omitting to
do something with a view to obtain other’s assent. [Section 2(a)]

• Acceptance: When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent for the
same thing in the same sense as proposed by the offeror. [Section 2(b)]

• Promise: When a proposal is accepted, it becomes a promise. [Section 2(b)]

• Consideration: It is the price for the promise. It is the return one gets for his act or omission.
[Section 2(d)]

An agreement is, therefore, a promise or set of promises forming consideration for all the parties.
[Section 2(e)]

Agreement = Promise or set of promises (offer + acceptance) + Consideration (for all the parties)

If a 7-year-old boy is buying an ice-cream from an ice-cream vendor and giving Rs. 10 in return, it
becomes an agreement. This is because the boy offers to buy ice-cream and the vendor accepts the
offer which makes it a promise. The consideration for both was ice-cream and money respectively.

How is a contract formed?

A contract is a lawful agreement. In other words, an agreement enforceable by law is a contract.

Contract = Agreement + Legal enforceability

Or

Contract = Legally enforceable Agreement

Now, the law says that any contract entered with a person below the age of 18 years is not
enforceable. In the above case, the deal between the boy and ice-cream vendor was an agreement
but it cannot be termed as a contract because it is not legally enforceable.

How does an agreement become a contract?

The parties must be competent to contract

The parties entering into the contract are competent to contract when they:

• Have attained the age of majority i.e. 18 years of age,

• Are of Sound mind, and

• Are not expressly disqualified from contracting by the law

At the time of entering into an agreement, if a person is of unsound mind or is disqualified by law;
the agreement is considered to be void. On the other hand, an agreement entered with a minor is
void-ab-initio i.e. void from the very beginning and thus cannot be enforced. For example, if a
seven-year-old boy is buying an ice-cream; although he is entering into an agreement with the
icecream vendor, it is not considered as a contract because being a minor; the party is not
competent to contract. (Minor)

Similarly, if Vidya Balan in the movie Bhool Bhulaiya is entering into an agreement at the time when
she is considering herself as Manjulika, the agreement becomes void because of her unsoundness of
mind at the time of entering into the agreement. (Unsound mind)

The consent must be free

The consent can be given expressly by words- oral or written or impliedly by gestures or surrounding
circumstances. (Section 13)

For example, A offered B to sell his car for Rs. 50,000. A asked him to come to the house in the
evening with cash if he is willing to buy the car. When B came to the house with cash in the evening,
it shows his implied consent to buy the car.

But, the consent so given by the person must be free and not influenced by any outside force. The
consent of a person is said to be free unless it is not caused by any of the acts mentioned below:
(Section 14)

• Coercion (Section 15)

• Undue Influence (Section 16)

• Misrepresentation (Section 18)

• Fraud (Section 17)

• Mistake (Section 20, 21, 22)

In the above-mentioned cases, the agreement becomes voidable on the part of the aggrieved party
because the consent was not free.

Some examples are given for a better understanding of the concept:

Coercion: If Mr Batman gets some property sale agreement signed by Mr Superman under a threat
that he will kill his mother, Mr Superman is on the discretion that he can enforce the agreement or
not because his consent was obtained under coercion.

Undue Influence: The teacher asked the students that whosoever pays her Rs. 200, that student will
get full marks in the viva. Now the teacher was in a fiduciary relationship with the students and was
taking undue advantage of such a position. Thus, any such contract made by the teacher to student is
voidable on the part of the students.

Misrepresentation: Mr Lal was willing to buy a car owned by Mr Peela. At the time he was buying the
car, he asked Mr Peela about the colour of the car and said that he wants a pearl grey car. Mr Peela
was an old and illiterate man who was not having much knowledge about colour differentiation. Mr
Peela believed that the car is pearl grey and answered in affirmative.

Later on, Mr Lal came to know that the car was Metallic grey and not pearl grey. Here, Mr Peela is
liable for misrepresentation and Mr Lal is free to continue the contract or not.

Fraud: If in the above case, Mr Peela was aware of the actual colour of the car but lied to Mr Lal;
than he would have been guilty of fraud and such agreement would have been voidable.

Mistake: If both the parties are under a mistake of fact, the agreement becomes void. But if any or
both of the parties are under a mistake of law, the agreement becomes void. For example, A and B
entered into an agreement of sale of a particular drug. They were not aware that such a drug is
illegal in India. Their agreement is void.

The consideration and the object needs to be lawful

The consideration and object of an agreement are unlawful if it is:

• Forbidden by law

• Of such a nature that if permitted, would defeat the provisions of any law

• Fraudulent

• Involves or implies injury to person or property

• Regarded as immoral or opposed to public policy by the law

If any of the agreement contains abovementioned consideration or object, the agreement becomes
void. For example, entering into an agreement of killing somebody for money is considered to be
void. A person cannot approach the court saying that I have given the money but the contract killer is
not doing the job because the object was something which is forbidden by law and thus the contract
is void.

Similarly, if you are bribing a public officer to get some official papers to you; the papers might be
legal but the consideration you are paying is not lawful as it would defeat the provisions of
Prevention of Corruption Act.

The agreement should not expressly be declared to be void

There are certain kinds of contracts which are expressly declared by The Indian Contract Act, 1872 to
be null and void. The following are some of the agreements which are not enforceable in the eyes of
law:

• Agreements without consideration except it is written and registered or is a promise to

compensate for something done or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation law.

• Agreements in restraint of marriage

 • Agreements in restraint of trade

• Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings

• Agreements void for uncertainty

• Agreements by way of wager

• Agreements contingent on an impossible event

• Agreements to do impossible act

Those agreements are void which are based on any of the subjects mentioned above. There is no
liability for not enforcing the contract and thus, the conditions of the contract are not binding upon
any of the party.

For example, if Devdas asks Paro not to get married for her entire life then he will give her new dress
and shoes in return; it cannot be considered as a valid contract because the agreement is made in
restraint of marriage.

Similarly, if the agreement is made to not to work for the entire life in exchange for a new flat, it will
not be considered as a valid contract as it is in restraint of trade.

Also, if a father enters into an agreement with his son that the father will get him a new bicycle if the
son scores 105% in his board exams. It will be considered a void agreement because it is an
agreement to do an impossible act.

The above-mentioned conditions are required to be fulfilled in order to make an agreement legally
enforceable. The agreement becomes void if any of the mentioned conditions are left unfulfilled
except in the case of free consent where the agreement becomes voidable instead of void and giving
the party, whose consent was not free at the time of entering into the contract, the discretion to
continue the contract or not.

Conclusion

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 can be interpreted to cover all kinds of possible agreements and
contracts. But, in several cases, it depends upon the facts and circumstances whether an agreement
is a contract or not. In a nutshell, all the agreements which are legally enforceable become contracts.
This concludes that there can be agreements which are not contract but there can be no contracts
which are not agreements.

Agreement and Contract: The difference

‘All contracts are agreements but all agreements are not contracts.’ This statement can be
understood from the above Venn diagram. The agreements which are enforceable under the law of
the land become contracts, which are denoted by the inner circle. The outer circle denotes the
agreements which are not contracts. The shaded part includes agreements which are not
enforceable by law and are known as void agreement.
The concept of Voidable contracts: There exist some agreements which are enforceable on the part
of one party but not on the option of other parties. It is on the discretion of that party if it is willing
to enforce the contract or make it non-enforceable i.e. void. The voidable agreements are therefore
both valid and void agreements. The dotted circle of voidable agreements denotes that they can be
termed as void or valid on the discretion of one party thus covers the area of both valid and void
agreements.

For example, if a person is buying a car which is just 3-4 years old and the owner lied about the year
of manufacturing of the car thereby committing fraud. Now, according to the Indian Contract Act,
1872 fraud makes a contract voidable. Therefore, the buyer is on the discretion that he can either
buy the car or not, whereas the seller is bound by the promise he made.